Wednesday 20th August 2025
Blog Page 1194

Fashion Matters

0

At the 2014 Vogue Festival, Alexa Chung said that “clothes are about manipulations: How I feel, how I want to feel and how I want others to feel about me”. Such a statement proves that fashion is more than just clothes. It is about your own feelings and about shaping other people’s perceptions of you. Clothes act as an escape; a way of expressing yourself outside the boundaries set by society. But Alexa’s statement seems to keep fashion within society: fashion is based on what other people think of you.

How much is fashion about the clothes or the person wearing the clothes? Alexa ticks all the stereotypical boxes for being pinned as a style icon, but I ask this: if someone wore the exact same clothes as she did, but was a an older, slightly larger woman, would she receive the same stylish accreditation, as it were?

Fashion is interconnected with the person. Fashion is, after all, about what we see and so it might be argued that to have someone attractive wearing the clothes enhances the overall impact those clothes have. But it’s not just about looks. Age is a factor too. A Google search of fashion ‘icons’ comes upwith the following: Blake Lively, Zoe Saldana, Rhianna, Cara Delevingne and so on. In other words, women who tend to be young. Even Victoria Beckham, who in her 40s and is often cited as one of the most stylish celebri- ties, looks considerably younger for her age. The ‘classic’ style icons from the past – think Audrey Hepburn, Marilyn Monroe, Elizabeth Taylor – all reached the pinnacle of fashion fame during their youth.

It is perhaps worrying that the first call for becoming a fashion icon is dependent on three criteria; slimness, attractiveness and youth. Without these, it is becoming more and more the case that the clothes them- selves are not enough.

There are exceptions, like Vivienne Westwood. Now in her 70s, she is still very much in the public eye for the clothes she wears. Then again, how much of this is because of her outspoken ideas and controversial views, as opposed to what she wears? Although talking about her personality rather than her looks, we are still back to the person, not the clothes.

If fashion is part of what makes someone’s identity then the clothes and the person can- not really be separated. The problem is when the media creates a certain ‘template’ for what a ‘stylish woman’ should be, typically listing only young, attractive women in their ‘The top 10 fashionable women of the year’ columns. There needs to be more diversity in how we showcase clothes and in who the media decides to pick out as stylish.

Alexa talks about clothes having the power to manipulate, but the media has also manipulated our perceptions of what fashionable ‘should’ look like. The answer to this is to make fashion more inclusive. Let’s take things back to basics by looking at the clothes themselves, not the person. By having more fashion icons who are larger, less flawless and older, we can make fashion something truly open to all.

A runner’s perspective on the Town & Gown 10k

0

It is the day of Town and Gown 2k15 (well, 10k-15 to be accurate), and an early start. I awoke at 1.45 AM, less than an hour after I had gone to sleep, reading my alarm-clock as 7.45AM. Misleadingly refreshed from my rather effective power nap, my usual nocturnal lifestyle failed to acknowledge that it isn’t pitch black at 7.45am. Two days earlier my sister had instructed me to ‘carb-load’, a technique which she said was supported not by her Biomedical Science degree, but by knowledge obtained from her GCSE PE Double award. I hence decided to down a bottle of Lucozade- raspberry flavoured- which catalysed a sugar rush that I’d regret when it woke me up four hours later.

At 8.00AM, after a night of intermittent sleep, I managed to force myself up, renouncing the thought that whilst going the whole 9 yards may be a lot of effort, running the whole 10936 yards of the 10 kilometers was probably going to be too. For breakfast, I discovered I only had bread crusts- a tragedy. My only option was pilfering. They say theft tarnishes a man, but I think it also tarnished said bread, because the stolen white slices, failed to live up to the goodness of my usual seeded wholemeal. Even a cup of peppermint tea couldn’t redeem such a meal- it was a middle class nightmare of undue proportions. I left a note of apology to my flatmate, informing them that they could help themselves to ‘any amount of my milk that they wanted’, signing off with ‘#thatsoundsweird’. If you can’t cross, and subvert communication platforms at 8.32AM on a Sunday morning with a handwritten hashtag, I don’t know when you can.

Before leaving, I managed to salvage one safety pin from a draw to secure my race number, and for the vital second one, was left only with the option of a black and white badge of Kurt Cobain’s face. It is times like this that I chastise myself for trying to be so edgy. Using seamstress skills, gained from my 100% homemade fancy dress record at bops, I took the route of stapling my number to myself instead. If that wasn’t ingenuity I don’t know what is. Forget the wheel, or even the bendy bus, this was true resourcefulness.

By 9.55AM, I had started bonding with fellow runners at the start line, befriending a middle-aged man, who stated he ‘just wanted to finish’. I questioned the truth in this, given his anticipation to press his expensive sports watch as we neared 10AM. I concluded however that humility is customary in such settings, especially when faced with a girl whose number is held on by staples. We waited in anticipation for the start, entertained by the visual fall out of Keble Ball which had happened the night before. Nothing is more amusing than seeing people who thought they could get away with a cheeky walk of shame, being met with 4000 runners as they creep out of Keble lodge. One girl’s ‘statement dress’, was presumably great for a dramatic entrance the previous night, but from the sheepish look on her face, she definitely hadn’t intended for it to be seen by thousands of fun-runners the next morning.  

At 10AM we began, and I took the ‘wise’ decision to find someone to appoint as my pace-keeper. Two muscly rugby players fitted the bill for a period of time, until I had to concede that my desire to run a good time was more important than my subconscious desire to objectify attractive men. By the 4km water station I was doing well, and although I managed to drench myself with water, I reasoned I was mostly seeking the thrill of throwing the cup to the pavement like a marathon runner anyway. The feeling of superiority you get through being able to litter in a park without fear of penalty, or dented morality, is frankly exhilarating.

I managed to finish the race in a good time, and post-race I was left on a high. I’m not sure whether it was the endorphins or the champagne from the Principal’s brunch, but I felt amazing. Considering bets were being had on whether I would a) vomit, or b) cry, and that I had received six text messages asking if I had in fact managed to get up in time, I felt that the race really was a success. Compared to the stress of essay writing, and wrestling over confined books in the SSL (largely in a metaphorical sense, but not always), putting one foot in front of the other was quite simple. I challenge anyone to give it a go next year, or at least sponsor such a good cause.

Tempers flare as Trinity five-a-side heats up

0

Halfway through this year’s five-a-side season, it’s easy to remember why it is so loved. It’s college football stripped to the core; any pretence which may have been established in the regular season, any tentative attempts to adopt a ‘strategy’ or ‘game plan’ is utterly blown away by the chaotic mediocrity of teams composed of players normally languishing on the bench of their college thirds.

Group 11 has already emerged as a powerhouse of talent, with Lincoln firsts and Worcester seconds tied for fi rst position and offering the possibility of a tantalising decider. The honour of the most impressive loss undoubtedly goes to captain Michael Bentham’s 11-0 defeat as head of Hertford seconds, which comes in at an impressive goal conceded every 54 seconds.

Hertford overall has had a “very mixed bag” according to captain of the first team, Alexander McAleavy, with a roughly equal mix of wins and losses across all of their teams and mid-table locations in their respective divisions. Hertford right back Toby Chelton has returned from a frustrating Hilary plagued with injury to become the college top scorer, making up somewhat for what is conceivably a porous Hertford back line.

The condensed nature of five-a-side makes for lots of these small success stories. Captain Mark Hattersley of the Merton seconds particularly praised James Zhou, who was expertly scouted as he walked to the gym after the team found themselves in need of an extra player last minute. Despite never playing before, and with the Guardiola-esque tactical advice of ‘go up front and everyone else defend,’ Zhou managed to score a late screamer to steal victory from a dogged St Antony’s side. Group 6 has emerged as one of the most balanced divisions, Merton seconds, St Antony, Oriel seconds and Pembroke thirds all thoroughly in contention, with the only true weak link invariably Wadham seconds, who according to captain Ben Zaranko are keeping up with the proud tradition of “losing every match where the other team have bothered to turn up”.

In contrast, Wadham 1Bs and St Catz seconds are separated by a single point at the top of Group 4, chased by a Univ thirds team steadily gaining momentum. Both teams have managed to achieve the rare five-a-side feat of defensive solidity and attacking intent, similar to this season’s most impressive team, St Catz firsts. Sitting at the summit of Group 3 with a goal difference of +20, it is difficult to see second place Wadham 1As finding a way past Peter Woods’ side.

St Hugh’s captain Christopher Putman, despite beating Univ seconds 4-1 and drawing 1-1 with New seconds and Wadham 1A, came up thoroughly short against Woods’ experienced squad, losing a potentially pivotal game 3-0. Blaming the ‘long trek from St Hugh’s down Iffley, which played havoc with our fitness levels’, St Hugh’s has made a positive if inconsistent start to the season, with all three teams well placed but not exactly blowing the opposition away.

While it might be a stretch to say that this year’s season has been of a high standard, with 85 teams playing across 12 groups, it is fair to say that the unique allure of summer football has not been lost. With very few clear leaders, the only thing we can definitely look forward to in the last half of the season is even more of the defensive howlers, last minute winners and hastily cobbled together teams playing games with double-digit scorelines. 

Oxford University divests from coal and tar sands

0

The University of Oxford has made a decision based on ethical grounds to exclude companies involved in the extraction of coal and tar-sands from its direct investments.

Students, academics and alumni have been campaigning for the university and its colleges to divest from the fossil fuel industry for over a year, with 41 college common rooms, representing over 12,500 students, passing motions to support the OUSU led campaign.

The University released a statement on Monday 18th March, saying, “given the risk of climate change to the environment and society, Council [the University’s executive governing body] has decided to strengthen further Oxford University Endowment Management’s [OUem] engagement with and reporting of the issue.”

Council agreed “to avoid investment in sectors with the highest environmental and social risks, leading to its present situation of no direct holdings in coal and oil sand companies”. Council has also requested OUem “to avoid any future investments in coal and oil sands.”

As of 31 December 2014, the Oxford Endowment Fund consists of £1.7 billion, with an estimated three per cent invested in the wider energy sector. 

The Investment Committee of the University will report annually on its voting decisions, and Council’s Environment Sustainability team is to release a yearly report on the carbon usage of sample groups of university members and on the progress towards institutional carbon emissions targets.

Bill McKibbon, founder of 350.org, a global grassroots movement with the aim of reducing global warming, commented, “Oxford may be the greatest University on our planet, and if anyone thought its great age might keep it from shaping the future, this decision should prove them wrong. Today it has offered great leadership on the crisis of our time.”

Andrew Taylor, the Fossil Free Campaigns Manager at People & Planet, said, “Many world leaders have studied under Oxford University’s spires. They should be taking notes today. The lesson is: it’s time to phase out coal and axe tar sands.”

Oxford academics have also spoken out in support of divestment, with over 100 academics signing an open letter requesting the University divest from fossil fuels. Dr. Felix Pinkert, a Lecturer of Philosophy at the University of Oxford, commented, “By excluding investments in coal and tar-sands extraction, the University of Oxford demonstrates that universities can carry out their academic missio while also acting with moral integrity in their investment choices.”

However, the university can still invest in large energy companies that own significant tar sands projects, if coal and tar sands contribute under ten percent of the company’s total production. This has led to continued criticism from some activists, who will continue to campaign for the university to commit to divestment from all fossil fuels.

Fossil Free UK stated, “Rather than the end of the campaign, activists see this as an important victory and the first step towards a fully sustainable investment policy that would include divestment from all fossil fuel companies.”

Student campaigner Cara Turton-Chambers commented, “While we are pleased with today’s results, we as students feel that transparency is an issue within the university structures. Full disclosure of the university’s investments should only confirm what they have told us today.”

Seventy alumni will be handing back their degrees from Oxford University on Saturday 23rd May, as the University has not fully committed to divestment from all fossil fuel companies. 

In addition to the University of Oxford, four other UK universities have committed to divesting from fossil fuels: Glasgow University, Bedfordshire University, the University of London SOAS, and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.

Profile: David Abraham

0

When David Abraham was turned down by Middlesex Polytechnic for a documentary-making course, after he completed his degree in History at Magdalen, he thought he would never make it in the world of television. Now the CEO of Channel 4, he keeps a copy of the rejection letter framed in his bathroom.

Channel 4 is famously irreverent in its output, and has courted controversy from broadcasting the first lesbian kiss on primetime British TV in 1993, to the debate surrounding the documentary Big Fat Gypsy Weddings, which was dropped in April this year. Publically owned but financially self-sufficient, the 2003 Communications Act states that Channel 4 should “demonstrate innovation, experiment and creativity in the form and content of programs”, “appeal to the tastes and interests of a culturally diverse society” and “include programs of an educational nature”. The most popular shows since the channel’s inception are Big Brother, Friends, Big Fat Gypsy Weddings and The Grand National. I asked Abraham whether this “tabloid television” was sticking to the Channel’s remit. Abraham strongly challenged this view:  “I would refute the suggestion that there is any ‘tabloid television’ on Channel 4. Big Brother ended on the show four years ago, and we’ve rebuilt our channel with brilliant shows like Educating Yorkshire, Educating Essex and fantastic drama like Babylon and Indian Summers. Some people like to come up with that comment but it’s absolutely not the case about our schedule currently”. But, he concedes “we must do shows that are appealing to a broad audience, so that they can generate significant advertising revenue to then pay for things like Dispatches, investigative pieces, or arts shows”.

He cites Channel 4‘s considerable educative output – like Grayson Perry’s BAFTA Award Winning Who are You?(“Two words sum this up – original and outstanding.”- RTS website), or Life From Space (“Probably one of the most ambitious live programs ever made.”- RTS website) that won a Royal Television Society Award for Excellence. Channel 4, Abraham argues, is unfairly criticised, “There’s a balance in the schedule, but often critics want to have it both ways”. They “demand that we should be running wall to wall Open University programmes, but they also want us to be commercially self-sufficient”.  

Anyone paying attention to the debacles and controversies of the management of the BBC in the last five years will understand the mire that can surround Public Service Broadcasters and their funding. When it was suggested that BBC should share license fee proceeds with other broadcasters, Abraham was reported as saying he would rather act “with utter impunity” than receive the money. I asked him why Channel 4 turned down this possibility of public funding, and whether he thought the BBC was constrained with what it could produce/report on: “I’m not suggesting that the BBC allows itself to be directly influenced by the government, but it must constantly justify itself to parliament (…) we (a) are smaller and (b) we have a remit that encourages risk taking and are expected to be iconoclastic, that is part of our tradition. By the time I got here that idea (receiving “top slice” funding from the BBC) had run its course: we decided that we had to cut our cloth according to our means”.  

Abraham eschews public funding, but believes that private pay platforms (Sky, Virgin etc) should pay Channel 4 for including 4’s channels as part of their service. He first made this argument last year in the James McTaggert Memorial Lecture, a speech delivered annually at the Edinburgh International Television Festival. The speech provoked much furore. Sky spokesman Graham McWilliam, claimed that Channel 4 was calling for a subsidy to compensate for the channel’s “declining performance” and “this would amount to a discriminatory tax on millions of licence fee paying viewers to watch public service content that should be free”.

I put McWilliam’s criticisms to Abraham. He replied that McWilliam was Sky’s “corporate spin-meister” and that Channel 4 was only asking for a fair deal. “It’s a pretty outrageous thing to say….our revenues are approaching record levels last year and this year. We’re spending more on UK originating content than we’ve ever done before, winning more awards and more Oscars…. So I won’t take that too seriously.” “The more substantive point” Abraham continues, is that “more than half the viewing on pay platforms is to public service channels, so if one imagined a world where the public channels were not available on pay platforms, the subscribers would be hugely inconvenienced …. Indeed it’s easy to demonstrate that a number of them would not be willing to pay £40/50 per month without the public channels.” He believes that the value that Channel 4, BBC and other PSBs provide to private pay platforms should be recognised, as it is in other countries: “it’s an argument about fair value exchange between public broadcasters and private companies that are profiting from the availability of these channels for free.”

Channel 4’s content is diverse, ranging from Indian Summers (a show in the finest traditions of BBC Sunday Night Drama) to its Alternative Christmas Message. Given the number of its shows aimed at a younger demographic, and its recent ethnic minorities election debate in the wake of UKIP’s rising popularity, I asked Abraham if Channel 4 saw itself as catering to a more diverse audience than other PSBs. “With regards to young people, E4 has by far the biggest share of 16-24 year olds of digital channels, and a serious documentary on Channel 4 will typically get more views among young people than on BBC and ITV.” In terms of ethnicity Abraham argues that “Channel 4 News has a higher proportion of BAME views than other channels.” Channel 4 traditionally sees itself as the channel of diversity, broadcasting the first black sitcom, the first lesbian kiss, the first disabled and transgender mainstream entertainment shows, and in 2012 it broadcast the Paralympics. The comedian and activist Lenny Henry has argued that a separate fund should be set aside to boost the presence of BAME participants in broadcasting (in a 2014 BAFTA lecture).

I asked Abraham about representation of minorities in Channel 4. “We keep a very close eye on representation across the board, both on screen as well as behind the camera for the production”, he replied. Abraham tells me about the “joined up thinking” that goes on within broadcasters “If you want to change the whole industry, you have to look at it on a genre by genre basis. What matters in investigative journalism will differ from what matters in drama, so we have given ourselves fresh targets on what we can do with each of those genres every three to five years.” Abraham believes that it is equally important for Channel 4 to be diverse in terms of region- “in shows like Gogglebox you can see that we are around the country no particular bias to the south or the north- we represent all voices”.

I’m sure that many of you dear students are familiar with the channel’s online offering All Four, having spent too much of your time watching Raised by Wolves instead of doing that vital essay. You are not alone. According to Abraham, half of all 16-24 year olds in the UK are registered on All Four. All Four can be said to be part of Channel 4’s data strategy:  monitoring user profiles and looking at their preferences. In his McTaggert lecture Abraham claimed that “A TV channel without a data strategy is like a submarine without sonar”.  Abraham oversaw the introduction of “All Four”, which keeps track of the viewing experience. He explains “what was initially the catch up experience is now a whole range of experiences: live TV, catch up, ‘what’s next?’” What’s become clear in our interview is that for Abraham, innovation and creativity must always be supported by Channel 4’s independence and commercial viability.

There has been much concern in some quarters as to what a publically owned but commercially funded BBC might look like if the licence fee is abolished. The experience of Channel 4 might suggest we do not have too much to fear.

Here’s how to style your career in fashion

0

Founded in France in 1945, Elle is one of the largest and best selling fashion magazines in the world. I interviewed Elle’s fashion Director, the warm, friendly and straight-talking Anne-Marie Curtis. She has been working at the publication for over then years.

When I asked her if fashion was something she had always wanted to do, I was surprised to find that her journey to become Fashion Director didn’t start as one might think.

Curtis grew up in Essex. She attended a convent school and was cut off from all things fashion, At 15, she discovered a brochure for the Central School of St Martins and, to quote her exact words, “That was it, I just flipped.” On track to study English, she discovered that fashion was something she could do for a living. After studying Fashion at Trent Polytechnic she turned her attention to styling. From there she gained experience at smaller magazines and went on to become one of the founding members of Wallpaper magazine. In 2004, she joined Elle.

Envisioning a Devil Wears Prada-style office, I was curious to know what the average day is like working at Elle. Again, the reply wasn’t what I expected. Essentially, there is no average day. The variety of duties is immense – sometimes you’re in the office brainstorming mood boards, other days you’re being shown collections and other times you’re shooting the next editorial. Less than half the job is office-based.

When asking about where Curtis gets her inspiration from, again, it all came down to variety. The main source is, of course, the catwalk: taking the big trends and then “translating” them to the reader. Photography, art and film are all other sources of inspiration. The best shoots, she tells me, are those using influences outside the fashion world, stepping outside of the box. Talking about stepping outside the box brought me to think about the digital age and the relevance this has for fashion. It is, according to Curtis, a huge one. “Fashion is a reflection of the times we live in – we can’t just stand still and ignore the changes around us.” Nevertheless, she was firm in her belief that print magazines will continue to survive. “The magazine, she tells me, “is about the dream. It’s about having something tangible in your hands. It’s an experience. It’s magical.”

Hearing comments like this, it was impossible to miss Curtis’ enthusiasm for what she does. Here is a woman who loves her job. One can hardly be surprised; shooting celebrities, compiling a 30-page spread for Elle’s 25th anniversary and travelling to the most exotic places in the world isn’t exactly your everyday nine to five job.

I asked what advice she would give to any one interested in going into journalism more generally, including news, sport, and of course fashion. This time the answer was clear and could be summed up in one word: passion. Above all you need to be enthusiastic, willing to learn and driven in looking for as many opportunities and as much experience as you can get.

As the interview was coming to a close there was one niggling question I still wanted to ask. As someone immersed in the world of fashion, who sees the most gorgeous and beautiful clothes on a daily basis, what is her number one fashion rule? As one might imagine, her open- minded approach gave me no rigid answer; as the old saying goes, fashion has no rules. “It’s about finding your own style, feeling confident and empowered. Being playful and fun and not taking things too seriously.” Clothes are something to be loved; they are your friends, she tells me.

Thanking her again for her time, I reflected upon how my new Topshop dress was indeed a much cherished friend of mine

Review: Beachcombing

0

Beachcombing review As an audience we knew we were in good hands from the opening thirty seconds of beachcombing. It was probably the violence of Pink Floyd’s interstellar overdrive that announced the control and self assurance of Jack Clover’s second directorial foray. As the young Syd Barret continued his LSD fuelled riffing, the wonderful Will Stanford swam and generally scrambled around in a sea of a tarpaulin. This introduced the two other distinguishing elements of beachcombing. The first is the excellent cast, a truly fantastic ensemble that, like few others, exceeds the sum of its well-oiled parts. The second is the sea. It’s prominence in creating both a thematic unity and a presence against which the actors react made it the lynchpin of the play . The north sea and the surrounding Essex coast has been a source of fascination for Clover having featured in his last (cuppers winning) piece of writing. In Beachcombing the sea is witness to a delicate and meditative story about a priest James (Will Stanford) and a girl Amy (Aoife Cantrill). But is not quite a boy meets girl story. In the first place the boy arrives on the scene having already lost the girl (his wife) . In the second place James is in his mid fiftees while Amy is seventeen. They meet one desolate evening as James stares out into the sea, praying or monologing to his dead wife. Amy who is running away from home for the evening, observes him from behind a pew. She asks him to stay the night. A request which for some reason James accepts. It’s a decision which the other characters in the play soon come to find unacceptable and one which indeed on paper sounds a little suspect. But that would be to miss the point. There is no suggestion of pedophilia or undue conduct. Yet in spite of this, Amy clearly has an affect on James . She has some bearing on the memory of his dead wife, but we are never entirely sure why. Shortly after they first meet, we see one of James’s memories of his wife played out, with Aoife playing the wife. The play thus becomes as much about unraveling James and Amy’s relationship as it does about James and his wife’s. The possible connections are left to us to ponder. Accompanying this central story we have several interludes set to music. These very beautiful moments straddle the line between dance and physical theatre to express something of James’s marriage. The best thing about these was the music, it was such a pleasure to hear something other than ‘edgy’ music at the BT for once. Parallel to the James and Amy story is Amy’s own backstory. From the minute we begin to wonder why she showed up at the church at the time, we become ever more curious about what led her there in the first place. To tell this story Clover has enlisted two other equally excellent actors Fred Weinand and Alethea Redfern. Both do an exceptional job in multi rolling the various personalities that James and Amy encounter. Together they really conjure a sense of the quaint pettiness of the small village it is Beacombing is set in. They’re performances (and script) show just how much depth and atmosphere can be created with so very little. This was indeed a very beautiful viewing experience. The craft involved in the staging, acting and writing was top notch. My only fault with the play is its ending. In the end I’m not sure the plays says much about anything beyond itself and its characters. While that’s not really a fault, it did leave me feeling that something was perhaps ever so slightly lacking. But it’s a minor quibble in an otherwise exemplary studio show.

Oxford runs this Town

0

Two weeks on from the London Mara­thon, Sunday 10th May was Oxford’s turn to capitalise on the running bug. Nearly 4,000 runners took to the streets for the Town and Gown 10k through the city centre, many more lining the streets to cheer on their friends, family and fellow students.

Starting outside Keble, runners got to en­joy a tour of the city’s most historic sites on traffic-free roads, looping round to Magdalen and back up to St Giles via Cornmarket Street, before finishing in the University Parks. At not quite a half marathon, it’s a challenging but far from overly gruelling trial for most runners, with costumes abounding.

Miles Unterreiner put in the fastest time of the day, with a highly impressive 31:23, a minute in front of his closest rival. Having taken BUCS 10k silver last week, Unterreiner seems to be enjoying an excellent run of form at the moment.

The first woman home was Sophie Carter, of Belgrave AC, who took her third victory in this race in the last five years, clocking in at 36:32.

Much as with the London Marathon, to look only at the frontrunners is to misjudge the nature of the event.

In fact, the race is organised by the char­ity Muscular Dystrophy UK, with all profits going to the charity which helps those with a variety of muscle-wasting conditions. The most common, Duchenne Muscular Dys­trophy, affects only males and has no cure, with a life expectancy for sufferers of around 20 years. From only this event last year, the charity managed to raise an incredible £155k, and, although final figures are not in, they hope to improve on this figure from this year’s event considerably given the surge in turn-out.

The race was started at 10am by the char­ity’s patron, author Christine Hamilton. There was also a junior 3km run beforehand. The youth event was not without incident though, after it had to be restarted after about ten minutes when the supporting motorcade took a wrong turn.

For the main event there was a late surge of interest as students and Oxford residents rushed to register on the morning of the race. One race organiser suggested to Cher­well that over 700 runners had registered on the day of the race itself.

A huge amount of credit is due to all finish­ers, both for raising funds and the training along the way. Following a record Oxford turnout at the London Marathon, it looks very much as though the Dark Blue momen­tum continues.

Brasenose brave the seas

1

When I finally decided to hang up my life jacket, five years ago now, I thought that it was for good. Oh buoy, how could I have been so wrong? When the call came in for any able-bodied volunteers, willing to take to the high seas (reservoir), in a desperate bid to defend our college’s pride and naval territories in this year’s sailing cuppers, I knew the time had come. As my old kit no longer fitted me, I donned my dad’s old life jacket, which had a retro and ‘hip’ (so I am told) style to it; it wouldn’t look amiss in Cellar. But in all seriousness, I did learn during the day that for yearly ‘initiations’, the Oxford Sailing Club goes out to Park End in their wetsuits and buoyancy aids.

So, early on Saturday 2nd May, we caught a bus over to Farmoor reservoir, a relatively large basin of water, split in two by a sizeable concrete wall. Whilst being initially confused as to why the reservoir had been divided in two, we wouldn’t have to wait long before our question was answered. As we stood in the clubhouse, staring at the great wall with confusion, we were called over to a dark corner of the bar by an old and mysterious man who we hadn’t noticed before.

“Beware ye who take to the waters on Farmoor reservoir. Beware ye of the killer shrimp! The only person to have encountered the killer shrimp and lived to tell the tale is old Mr MacPherson over there.”

But when we attempted ask this man more about his unfortunate encounter, we were met by screams of sheer terror.

Despite the warnings, we had come to sail and sail we would do. From the start, we knew we would be up against it, with only one of our team of four being an experienced regular Blues sailor. For Sailing Cuppers, as for regular training and inter-university competitions at the club, we were sailing the two-man Firefly dinghies. The Firefly has two sails, the mainsail and the jib, the smaller sail at the bow. Whilst the crew trims the jib and assists in ‘hiking out’, the helmsman steers the boat and controls the mainsail. In the morning, the group stages took place, in which we had eight races, which would decide which of the leagues we would start in for the afternoon’s racing, either bronze, silver or gold.

The short course made for some very close and exciting racing. Before the starting gun goes off, a three minute warning is given, during which time each boat strategically tries to determine if one end of the start line is favourable, and also time their approach to the line.

After a slow start, it was clear that my sailing prowess had gone somewhat rusty. The first leg of the course was up-wind, so you had to sail in a zig-zag pattern up towards the mark. After rounding the mark, there was a short reach (across the wind) to the second mark, followed by a long run (with the wind) down towards the bottom mark, then across to the last mark and up to the finish line.

Although we may not have fared too well according to the results, we brave few were definitely able to draw some personal satisfaction from not having capsized and avoiding an ugly death at the antennae of the killer shrimp.
After a fierce battle in the bronze league, we managed to scrape a respectable result with a nail-biting, yet very amateurish, finish to our last race.

But that’s enough about the minnows; in the Gold league some very strong boats from Lincoln (whose sailing stash was the envy of all the sailors there) and Brasenose battled it out for the coveted title of sailing cuppers champion. In the end, it was all smooth sailing for Brasenose, sinking their rivals and cruising to victory.