Monday 2nd June 2025
Blog Page 1243

Interview: Robert Nisbet

0

When Stephen ‘Red Badge’ Crane questioned his secondment to a peaceful Cuba to cover a non-existent war, the legendary newspaper proprietor William Randolph Hearst reputedly told him by telegraph, “You provide story. I’ll provide war.” Sky News’ Europe Correspondent, Robert Nisbet, has fortunately needed no such interventions, his appointment coinciding with a series of events that has once again placed Europe at the heart of world news.

The most recent of those events was the Paris terror attacks. The response to the attacks were “fascinating,” he said. “I’ve seen other campaigns move much more slowly, this exploded in a few hours… You got the sense that the protesters were fighting for the French way of life.”

In contrast, Nisbet talks about the relative lack of coverage on the simmering war between Russia and Ukraine – the first major seizure of another country’s territory in Europe since the Second World War. Nisbet was frank about the frustrations of his job. “This is,” he responds resignedly, “the nature of modern news. The news cycle has sped up, stories that used to linger in bulletins when I was young are being used up and spat out. As for Ukraine, I am not sure that either side will back down. When I was reporting in the Crimea it very much felt like Russia… Any effective response is a long way off.”

I ask him whether he has any ethical qualms about reporting on events when there is little he can do to help. He talks about reporting in Haiti. “When we arrived we went to a collapsed school to make our report. As soon as we got out of the car my cameraman tripped over the corpse of a child in the rubble.

“At that moment you have to check yourself, calm down and get on with your job… but there is always something useful in shining a light on these stories. It can produce positive results.”

Recalling one particular experience in Haiti, Nisbet says, “[We] were stood on the roof of an airport, on our right lay piles and piles of aid, and behind the fence on our left were thousands of desperate people. We thought there was something seriously wrong, and so we reported on it. Within a few days, the aid was getting to the people who needed it. The story had a purpose and made a difference.”

And his best news story? “A story that I’ll remember was the Chilean miners because it was so unexpected. I was with a group of families watching round a television when the first miner walked out of the rock. I am usually quite cynical about this sort of thing; what heartened me was that our audiences went through the roof. News stories don’t always have to be about death and destruction, the best news can be a heart-warming story where you need only point a camera at it and it speaks for itself.”

Nisbet clearly enjoys the journalistic lifestyle. When we spoke, he was just about to fly out from his home in Brussels to Greece to report on a possible ‘Grexit’. His career has embraced reporting on the Amanda Knox trials, Obama’s 2008 election campaign, and interviews with icons such as Robin Williams, George Clooney and even Gorbachev.

I ask him about the US election campaign, and he laughs wryly. “Obama was at a fair, and I, in a clump of reporters yelled at him above the clamour, ‘What do you hope to achieve in the future?’ He replied ‘I just want to eat this corndog,’ and ran away. As my father said, it was hardly Frost and Nixon.”

While the immediate
 concern may be with 
a ‘Grexit’, the shadow of 
a ‘Brexit’ must also loom large for a European correspondent. How does Nisbet think the story will play out? “In 2011 when everything was going to pot with the debt crisis, even then talking to European diplomats the response they gave was ‘Britain always threatens to leave, always nothing comes of it.’ Now there is a change in the air. The contempt felt by the British people for the EU is strengthening.”

Nisbet claims that some diplomats think David Cameron actually wants Britain to leave as a ploy to win short term political gain, “though that’s not my opinion,” he qualifies. “It all comes down to a fundamental difference between Britain and the rest of the countries in the EU… there is an emotional attachment to a united Europe that British people just do not share.”

“People like Farage take advantage by stripping it of its nuance. He knows that if you mention facts and details you sound boring. Take the debate between Farage and Clegg. Clegg gave facts and figures, Farage gave emotive rhetoric. He knows that you can win on the broad brush strokes but lose on the detail.”

I finish by asking for advice for aspiring journalists. “Inhale information. Read everything. I read everything from the Financial Times to Buzzfeed… You must remember
that the media isn’t dying, it’s changing. Your generation has
 to adapt and find your place in it. 
As consumers and maybe as reporters, it is up to you to adapt our news, whilst keeping its integrity.”

We need to look at the stigma around eating disorders

I have anorexia. I have done for quite a long time. I go to therapy. I take anti-depressants. I am mentally ill. What’s your reaction? Shock? Embarrassment? Disgust? What do you think of me? Am I vain? Am I an attention seeker? A liar even?

I wouldn’t be surprised if your mind immediately jumped to any of these conclusions; they’re all responses I’ve come across on multiple occasions since I started speaking openly about my condition.

For a long time I was ashamed of my eating disorder. I had an intense fear of how people might react, so I kept quiet about it and made up excuses as to why I wasn’t in school. I’d rather say I had a stomach bug than admit I had anorexia. 

When push comes to shove, no one will criticise you for having a physical ailment, you might even get a bit of sympathy if you’re lucky. When, however, it comes to an illness of the mind, that’s a whole different kettle of fish.

I’d heard the way people spoke about others with my condition. I’d sat and listened to the comments that they were attention seeking by “ramming their illness down our throats”, the remarks that, “if she were genuinely ill, she wouldn’t want us to know” and the claims of both vanity and weakness. Knowing this was the case, how could I have dared to speak out, even if I knew that would make things better for me in the long run?

Then, one day, I had a realisation. By staying quiet I was letting them win. I was allowing their ignorance to get the better of me and in doing that, I was almost saying people were right to stigmatise sufferers of the illness. And that was something I knew I just could not do.

I believe that this stigmatisation of anorexia and other eating disorders is mostly due to ignorance, primarily caused by the way we portray anorexia. By glamourising the condition in the media, we make people see it is as something ‘special’ and ‘exclusive’, something from which only beautiful, rich, popular girls and women suffer. Admitting to having the illness starts to be perceived as vanity.

Equally, the way the illness is taught in school plays a role in leading to stigma. In my experience, lessons on anorexia primarily consisted of showing students images of highly underweight models, leading people to believe that you can only be ‘anorexic’ if you resemble this. Thus, when someone with a slightly healthier BMI opens up, they’re accused of being a liar.

I truly believe that we can defeat the stigma surrounding anorexia. No one passes judgement because they are a bad person, but simply because they don’t understand. If they knew the reality of what anorexia is, most people wouldn’t react in the way they do. And that’s why it’s so important to speak out. Being vocal about your illness and your experiences is not begging for sympathy or attention seeking, you’re showing people what eating disorders truly are. You’re showing them that sufferers are just normal people who are going through the hardest battle of their lives. And above all, you’re showing other sufferers that it’s okay; their problems are legitimate, they are not alone, and people will recognise their suffering and help them.

And what if you’re not a sufferer? What can you do? Well, that’s simple: just don’t judge. Rather than criticising them, acknowledge the courage it’s taking the person who’s just told you they have anorexia to fight their demons, and try your best to support them.

Don’t make it harder than it already is. You wouldn’t be critical of someone with a physical illness – mental illness sufferers deserve exactly the same. 

OxStew: Investigation reveals underage drinking culture

0

A report into Oxford’s underage drinking culture was released yesterday by OUSU, following a month-long investigation into Oxford’s social scene. The investigation was conducted in light of the recent underage drinking scandal at OULC, where a 17 year old was found to have consumed several alcoholic beverages at one of their drinks events.

The report highlights the many places where ID-checking needs to be introduced, and discusses the impact of Oxford’s underage drinking culture on wider society. It ends by recommending that ID checks are performed in all college bars, even if the bar staff think they ‘know’ the people they’re serving, and for all underage students to be made to wear brightly coloured bibs at society events.

The report further recommends that underage students be breathalysed nightly by porters, just to be on the safe side, and be paired with an older student on trips after dark to ensure they’re not going anywhere near alcohol. When questioned as to whether these measures match up to how significant the problem is, OUSU officer Martin Goring, who was in charge of the report, argued, “Although there are in fact only seven students at Oxford that are under 18, we think we are more than justified in calling this an underage drinking culture. This insidious culture is poisoning Oxford life and destroying its prized reputation for sobriety.”

The national media was quick to agree with the report, and to condemn the underage drinking epidemic at Oxford. The OxStew contacted Guardian editor Paul Elder, who said, “We were going to do a double page spread with new information on the threat to the UK from militant Islamists, but decided that there was a far greater public interest in a 17 year old Oxford student consuming too many alcoholic drinks. The public has a right to know that the leaders of tomorrow are consuming alcohol before their 18th birthday, which we can all agree suggests a tendency to disregard the law that they will one day be required to uphold.”

Buzzfeed editor Stacey Lister agreed, adding, “Everyone has an interest in how Oxford students behave, and it’s simply unacceptable for them to be drinking underage. Oxford is now number one of our ‘Top Ten Unis To Drink At When You’re 17’, and frankly it’s pretty disgraceful.”

It has been noted by several think tanks that media interest in Oxford stories has increased lately, with several Oxford stories such as the underage drinking scandal making it into national newspapers. Aside from covering Oxford’s teen drinking crisis, papers have also included articles on various subjects such as the Law Society’s elections; inequality in punting abilities; an argument at a college bop over inappropriate outfits; and one drunk student smashing two glasses at dinner.

When asked why this might be, Derek Cox of The Media Observatory suggested that it was to do with matters of national importance, “From interviewing several editors of national publications,” he said, “we have ascertained that the media disproportionately features Oxford stories because of the overwhelming public interest in them. It is certainly nothing to do with needing to fill space, or it being easier to write stories that compound stereotypes rather than contradict them, or that the underage drinking problem in the rest of the country being frankly too large and obvious to bother reporting on. Oxford is a national treasure that everyone loves to hear about – especially when it’s good news. By chance, it just so happens that it hasn’t been recently”

Review: The Woman in Black

0

★★★★☆

Four Stars

December 1987. The Stephen Joseph The­atre in Scarborough. Artistic director Robin Hertford, working with a crip­plingly low budget, commissions playwright Stephen Mallatratt to fill a gap in the theatre’s schedule. The result is The Woman In Black, a tense, elegant two-hander based on the Susan Hill novel of the same name.

June 1989. The Woman In Black, still directed by Robin Hertford, is transferred from West­minster’s Playhouse Theatre to the Fortune on Russell Street, where it is to remain for the next 27 years, becoming the second longest-running non-musical in the history of London theatres.

January 2015. Mallatratt’s play arrives at the Oxford Playhouse as part of a national tour, still directed by Robin Hertford, and still essen­tially the same production that was performed in Scarborough almost three decades ago.

The plot revolves around the young Arthur Kipps’ ill-fated visit to Eel Marsh House, an isolated mansion in rural England with a dark history. Classic horror motifs abound: scared locals reticent to divulge any information, eerie noises echoing from supposedly empty rooms, and the occasional hair-raising sight of the epony­mous ghost.

Malcolm James and Matt Connor star respectively as the elderly Arthur Kipps, a timid gentleman frightened by the spotlight, and The Actor, the man entrusted with helping Kipps’ de­liver his chilling story to the world on stage. Connor, as The Actor, portrays the young Kipps, whilst James, as Kipps, provides a host of support­ing charac­ters.

It is packed full of meta-theatricality; we see Kipps and The Actor slip in and out of charac­ter before the audience, delving in and out of Kipps’ story. It is a tremendously effective device, as the audi­ence is periodically thrown into the terrifying world of Eel Marsh House, then dragged back to ‘reality’ for a comforting few minutes before the next breathless plunge.

The Woman In Black’s power to scare derives from this device. The audience is under no illu­sions as to the pretence, but far from denying the performance any realism, it establishes a firm complicity between performer and viewer, which paradoxically augments the ten­sion, rather than diminishing it.

The play relies substantially on the audi­ence’s imagination, stimulating it with the most subtle of technical direction. A slight change in light shifts a scene from present to past, a bubbling of recorded sound signals a change of location, and the mind of the viewer extrapolates from this a bustling London street, or a deserted marsh, or a wind­swept graveyard.

Both James and Connor are well cast. The former’s versatility is cap­tivating; he inhabits each idiosyn­cratic supporting character with a realism that truly delights. The latter, with his wide smile and commanding voice, is perhaps slightly too enthusias­tic, but both display an impressive physicality that is as engaging as it is appropriate.

Make no mistake, The Woman In Black is a scary play. Something of the atmospheric intimacy that characterises the productions’ per­formances at The Fortune is lost in the relatively wide expanse of the OP, but in truth, this matters little when the writing, the direction, and the acting is commendable to the point of eulogy.

The Woman In Black is on until Saturday at The Oxford Playhouse.

Review: Björk – Vulnicura

0
★★★★☆
Four Stars

On the cover art for her new album, Björk lays open the painful whirlpool of emotion that engulfs Vulnicura, by literally wearing her wounded and festering heart on the (album) sleeve. Forced to release the album two months ahead of schedule after an online leak, it has come about unexpectedly, like, I imagine, the breakup from artist Matthew Barney she details.

Drawing on the experimental electronic soundscapes of co-producers The Haxan Cloak and Arca, the 49 year old Icelandic songwriter and performer hasn’t compromised the typically Björkian vein of avant-garde musical experimentation to release a dreary series of emotion-laden breakup songs. The Haxan Cloak’s influence can be felt in the underlying bass thuds, whilst Arca stamps his identity on the album with his industrially tinged, glitchy shrapnel-like beats, felt on tracks like ‘Family’, on which Björk’s vocals are drawn out over deconstructed dance beats like a heart being wrenched.

In the album’s opening track, ‘Stonemilker’, which might also be the most melodically straightforward and accessible song of the album, her vocals soar over avant-garde string arrangements and the boom and crack of fragmented, electronic beats.

The coalescence of the personal with the universal is expressed in the raw ‘History of Touches’, with the lyrics, “Every single fuck/We had together/Is in a wondrous time lapse”, reflecting Björk fine tuning her soul to the universal wavelength, as she does over the shifting strings of ‘Atom Dance’. But like the fleshy slit on her chest as depicted on the album cover, there are moments where the music takes on a grotesque physicality, notably in ‘Mouth Mantra’ which unleashes the sudden gushing of the “thousands of sounds”. It feels like a reflection of Björk’s pent-up emotion and the experience of finding your voice again after a messy breakup as alluded to by, “My throat was stuffed/My mouth was sewn up/Banned from making noise”.

Although she sings, “Maybe he will come out of this loving me/Maybe he won’t/Somehow, I’m not too bothered” on ‘Lion Song’, the stretched-out agony of ten minute track ‘Black Lake’ suggests otherwise. Closing on the twitchy and clanging landscape of ‘Quicksand’, she seems to finally reject total recovery, singing, “When we’re whole, we’re broken”. It’s an intensely cathartic and emotionally draining album – a reverie of groaning strings, mutated beats and jarringly pitched echoes. But through the open wound, Björk’s unique sonic palette shines through, undefeated.

Review: Viet Cong – Viet Cong

0
★★★★☆
Four Stars
 

If albums are like nuts, then the self-titled debut LP from the Canadian group Viet Cong is without doubt a Brazil nut – tough to crack, but intensely rewarding with a bit of effort.

For one thing, it is very difficult to categorise or place an album that has so many sonic influences: from the intriguing, listenable noise of ‘Newspaper Spoons’, to the percussive energy of ‘Bunker buster’, and the throbbing, almost mechanical build and euphoric volta of ‘March of Progress’, the album is a mix of moods, sounding at times industrial and post-punk, at others almost like a product of the Australian psychedelic pop revival.

While the song titles seem somewhat bland and deadpan – think ‘Death’ and ‘Pointless Experience’ – the tracks are far from it. The roles of instruments are subverted, with the bass piercing through a six string growl, on top of drums so heavily filtered they sound sampled from a Perc album.

The value of this album, therefore, is very much rooted in its crafting. Without a political axe to grind, or romantic sentiments crying to be released, it is not an album with baggage – despite the death of an ex-band member from a former project.

What is quite clear, however, is an inner conviction and pleasure in the beauty of four people playing in a room. Give it the time, and the effort, and it is an album that will give great pleasure.

Wot Do u Call It: talking grime with the Originators

0

How would P Money describe grime to someone new to the genre? “Vibes. Great vibes.” The Oxford stop of the Originators tour was profuse with “vibes”, causing bygone dons to turn in their graves, reeling at the guttural basslines pounding through their historic city walls. I caught up with some of the scene’s makers and shapers to get their thoughts on grime’s growing mainstream appeal.

The presence of these grime heavyweights in a city more renowned for its dreaming spires than Sir Spyro(s) is a testament to grime’s changing audience since the days of its early beginnings on Fruity Loops Studio on old PCs. When grime first burst onto the scene in the form of clashes crackling on pirate radio and eski raves, the deadpan bars of Wiley and Dizzee, and Ruff Sqwad’s bone-chilling instrumentals were deemed fodder for violence and disorder. Now, it’s being steered into the mainstream by ‘German Whip’ and Skepta’s ‘That’s Not Me’, accruing a new following in the process. “This guy’s come to see me from Japan!” P Money exclaims to me, bemused by the dedication of a young fan who’d flown over just to see him perform in Oxford’s answer to Jammer’s basement.

“When I used to go raving as a kid, I had to go through metal detectors and stuff ,” Logan Sama tells me. “There’s none of that now, it’s all trendy kids and students.” I ask the DJ, who pioneered the scene in its early years when MCs like P Money were starting out, why he thinks this is. “They’re generally more open to things.” Although, as he points out, the original audience are also now in their thirties and probably have families. “I’m sure they still like grime, but they’re just not active.”

I ask P Money whether he thinks grime’s voyage into the mainstream is benefiting the genre. “It’s good for any genre. People confuse mainstream with selling out; mainstream just means popular. Like, how many people are singing along now?” he asks, turning to Oxford’s Out of the Blue-cum-More Fire crew. “People said grime was dead, but it’s never been dead. People just lost faith.”

Logan Sama sees the resurgence as part of the cyclical nature of UK’s electronic music. “Everything comes back around. Disclosure brought garage back and now all of a sudden, DJ EZ’s really cool and trendy. Unfortunately people in this country are very quick to be over something, after that initial honeymoon period,” and he suspects grime will have a cool-off period too. 

Not only have some of grime’s originators been re-energised after a period of lying low, but a new wave of fresh talent such as Stormzy and Novelist, grime’s new poster child, has emerged. “That generation’s really interesting to me because we’ve been doing this for twelve years, and they’re seventeen” Logan Sama tells me. “All of their conscious music-listening life, grime’s been in and around their ears.”

But the recent spotlight on producers like Darq E Freaker, whose Cherryade EP was one of label Oil Gang’s biggest hits, has reminded us that grime’s birthday suit is its instrumentals. I ask Freaker how he would define his sound, labelling everything from ‘technicolour’ to ‘chronic’ grime. “Define me as you perceive me,” he says coolly. Freaker tells me he grew up listening to Timbaland, Missy Elliot and Prodigy, and these eclectic influences are pronounced in his genre-blending, transatlantic music, having brought grime to a US audience via Danny Brown.

Despite this, Logan Sama is adamant that the MCs will remain at the forefront of grime’s changing landscape. “I don’t like to say one’s more important than the other. But the MCs are always going to be the focal point because of their personalities and character. They’re driving the culture too.” Big Narstie, who donned a first year’s mortar board at a Wadham after party and posted it on Instagram, is perhaps the best case in point.

There’s an element of nostalgia to Logan Sama’s recollections of early grime. “Grime was really exciting because it had that punk ethos of getting the most out of a limited set of tools, making tunes using whatever sounds were in the keyboard” he tells me. “For me, whenever a new grime producer came out, be it Musical Mob or Terror Danjah, they all had their own sounds. I think that’s been lost a little bit.”

I ask Logan Sama what he thinks about some of instrumental grime’s more ambient sounds from producers like Murlo and Mr Mitch. “A lot of it doesn’t appeal to my aesthetic, but other people like it and I love that width of appeal. That’s why grime has kept going for twelve years.” With hits from fresh new talent like Novelist and Mumdance, and more exciting collaborations in the pipeline, grime continues to grow, ‘1 sec’ at a time.

Review: Mark Ronson – Uptown Special

0
★★★★☆
Four Stars
 
Mark Ronson’s multi-talented musical mind has produced, in Uptown Special, his best product yet. That’s saying a lot after the huge success of ‘Valerie’. 2010’s Record Collection lacked the same brilliance he’d previously demonstrated, but Ronson is back on form. The first single off the album, ‘Uptown Funk’, topped the charts in over seven countries and is a floor-filler with lasting value.
 
It seems Ronson’s phonebook is bursting at the seams. Uptown Special features the likes of Stevie Wonder, Bruno Mars and double Grammy award winning producer Jeff Bhasker. The first track, even preamble, ‘Uptown’s First Finale’, sets the eclectic tone for the album. This is largely thanks to Stevie Wonder and his deep jazz harmonica laid over a synthesised beat. The lyrical filth of the rap track, ‘Feel Right’, gives the album yet another edge, whilst ‘Summer Breaking’ is a jazz rock track reminiscent of the seventies.
 
With ‘Daffodils’ and ‘In the Case of Fire’, the album goes from strength to strength, especially given the latter’s immediately catchy opening rift. As the album progresses, ‘Crack in the Peal’ sees it at its most mellow, with a wonderfully chilling R&B feel. ‘Leaving Los Feliz’ and ‘Heavy and Rolling’ give the sense that you’re still on the dance floor but it’s nearing time, rounding up one hell of a night. 
 

Review: The Dumb Waiter

0

★★★☆☆

Three Stars

One room, two beds, two hitmen and, inexplicably, one dumb waiter – this is the seemingly impenetrable premise of Harold Pinter’s compact, one-act play, The Dumb Waiter, which is being staged at the BT Studio until Saturday of 2nd Week. The Dumb Waiter was first performed in January 1960 and, in the same way that Beckett’s Waiting For Godot did seven years earlier, it creates drama from pretty much nothing but the passive act of waiting.

Gus (Adam Leonard) and Ben (Tom Marshall) are our Vladimir and Estragon: two assassins waiting impatiently in a dilapidated flat for their orders, the latter attempting to distract himself with a paper, the former fidgeting restlessly. Their conversation meanders, occasionally tending towards something with hints of existentialism, but otherwise inanely innocuous, until the eponymous delivery device at the back of the stage suddenly begins to deliver food orders to the pair’s hesitant consternation.

The Dumb Waiter is recognisably Pinterian from the very beginning to the very end; it is packed full of tangible menace, dripping with those evocative Pinterian pauses, and underneath it all, a vague political comment shines through. Gus and Ben appear as two mice in a maze, being controlled, unwittingly, by forces beyond their comprehension. Filing the Godot role here is the pair’s mysterious employer, Wilson.

What is the significance of the dumb waiter? Who is the assassins’ target? Who is controlling their movements? And why? Above all else, this is the question the audience wants answered: why are they here, in this room, doing these things? These questions are the springboard to oblique, implicit philosophising upon the nature of authority, the limits of ability, and the state of the human condition itself. All this just broils beneath the implacable surface.

Director Tom White’s production addresses these themes in soft focus, however, seemingly more focussed on the nuanced relationship between the two hitmen than the external forces acting upon them. Leonard and Marshall are well-cast, finding a laudable realism for the most part, which renders their situation all the more absorbing. That said, their characters’ idiosyncrasies are occasionally too exaggerated and their interaction, particularly when in states of heightened emotion, a little too contrived.

White, Leonard and Marshall all deserve praise, however, for the way in which they uphold the play’s fundamental intrigue without losing the audience’s attention. Enough throwaway remarks are dropped, enough dark subjects are tentatively broached, and enough leading questions are thrown into the mix to maintain the audience’s curiosity without ever going too far and losing it entirely.

Frustratingly, but appropriately, this curiosity is never fully satisfied and the play’s surprising denouement provokes yet more questions. There is but a glimmer of realisation, quickly snuffed out by the curtain. Confusion, impatient confusion, is all that the audience is left with.

Pub closes after attracting far from a maddening crowd

0

A city-centre pub that had previously been awarded Oxford pub of the year three times by “CAMRA” is to closed on Saturday after “attempts to renegotiate the liaise” failed.

“Far from The Madding Crowd”, which describes itself as a “family run, independent free house in the heart of Oxford” declared last Saturday was to be the final day of serving customers since opening in 2002, making it one of Oxford’s youngest pubs.

In a statement to its customers, the pub said, “Following negotiations with the landlord, attempts to renegotiate were not possible” and that therefore they had been “told to vacate the premises by 31st of January”.

Landlord Charles Eld had previously told the Oxford Mail that running the pub was “no longer economically viable”, citing alcohol pricing in supermarkets and a change in the drinking culture as a fundamental reason.

Bartender John Burns, however, turned to the issue of local people not attending the pub so much, as opposed to a change in university drinking culture.

He told Cherwell, “When the students are back, we’re busy and our quiz attracts a fair few people, but when university students aren’t about we just don’t get enough customers.”

Despite having held cider festivals, quiz nights and “Open Mic” evenings, Burns did not believe customer numbers had risen outside of University Term time.  

The closure also raises questions about the future of the pub industry in a city notorious for a number of both historic and newer pubs.

Oxford Councillor Bob Price was quick to point out that Oxford has previously escaped the pub decline.

He commented, “There has been a long term national decline in the number of pubs but, thankfully, Oxford city centre has gone against this trend and retained most of its historic pubs as well as adding new places to drink and eat that are pleasant and interesting.”

“’Far from the Madding Crowd’ was set up fairly recently to provide a music venue, as well as a pub and has been a great success over the years it has been open, so we are sad to see it shut.”

He also emphasised that the Council has worked hard on its planning policies in order to protect pubs from conversion to housing as far as it can, but explained how the current Coalition Government’s “liberalisation of permitted development rights” has made this conversion of pubs for retail use very difficult to prevent.

He said, “We successfully resisted the conversion of the Chester Arms in Iffley Fields last year, but such successes are relatively rare.”

Chairman of Oxfordshire of Campaign for Real Ale (CAMRA) Tony Goulding was equally keen to point out that the Oxford Pub industry does not seem under any imminent threat. 

He told Cherwell, “It was a tragedy to lose ‘Far from the Madding Crowd’ (FFTMC), but I believe that the remaining city centre pubs are in good health with the occasional shock coming from the suburbs and outlying villages.

“In the brave venture of opening FFTMC, the rent and council taxes proved to be a never ending burden on the business. The cost of obtaining a city pub on purchase is almost beyond the pale due to extreme value of land and buildings; only the big pub companies or larger breweries having any resources and even they are reluctant to throw high 6 figure sums around.“

He went on to discuss the biggest threats to Oxford’s pub industry, remarking on companies like “Wetherspoon” who have chosen to convert shops into pubs with their “seemingly bottomless pit of money” and the competition from supermarkets.

It is not yet known whether the premises will remain a pub, or whether it could convert to housing.

Strathclyde Pension Fund owns the building in Friar’s entry, although they are unavailable for comment.