Thursday 9th April 2026
Blog Page 1250

PC Music: why the hype?

0

“Last week, PC Music launched their fake social media outlet Pop Cube.” If that sentence means nothing to you then congratulations, you probably go to Merton. Let me fill you in. PC Music is a much-hyped music label that rose from tumblr fanboy dungeons to the dazzling heights of The Guardian Film and Music supplement over the course of 2014. Their music, if you haven’t heard it, sounds like 90s pop that’s been genetically fused with a heart emoji. Some people say it’s great. Some people say it’s shit. But everyone’s saying something.

The rise of PC Music was unstoppable. High-concept acts like GFOTY (which stands for Girl- friend Of The Year) and QT caught the attention of journalists early on. Interviews were few and far between, but when they came they revealed bizarre figures that spoke more like teenagers’ text messages than humans.

When the Guardian interviewed GFOTY she was in bed next to a naked man. QT’s first single was framed as the promotion for a fictional fizzy drink. I don’t know if there’s a Guinness world record for ‘highest think piece
to music ratio’, but PC Music are absolutely smashing it if there is.

A vast proportion of the increasingly voluminous discourse surrounding PC Music portrays its over-sugared sonic and lyrical content as some kind of a critique, predominantly of this world where exploitative brands want to be your friend, and Buzzfeed interns want to manipulate your emotions for clicks.

This line of thought runs something along the lines, ‘PC Music is the only relevant musical reaction to the alienated subject in late capitalism,’ and it’s currently being espoused from behind a roll-up and a douche snapback all over the country. If you ever hear it be on your guard: once you hear the word ‘accelerationist’ it is your stern duty to take off your shirt and fight them. However, the idea that PC Music is in some way a criticism of hyper-branded personhood is tempting. “Look,” said PC Music, “we’re launching a social media like we all use, us young people.”

“It doesn’t exist,” they say, “but you can come to our exclusive party and watch us perform from behind a glass wall.” That’s not a metaphor, by the way. They actually performed from behind a glass wall. “Read into it,” they whisper leaning in, “whatever you will.” Equally tempting is the larger idea behind all of this – behind the fake soft drinks, the strange puppet-personas, the non-existent business – which is simply that PC Music is in some way the future. They are unquestionably the most hyped act in music right now. In fact, the bubble of hype surrounding the label is so large, you might begin to worry that if it burst there would be a depression. And what would we do then? Simply wander around in a dustbowl populated only by Sam Smith, Marcus Mumford and Tupac’s hologram, which flickers fainter, ever fainter…

Well, no. I like PC Music (well, I like some of it – I’m looking at you GFOTY). However, these two ideas both seem false to me. Last week they launched Popcube, a fictional multimedia company. “Best thing ever to happen, happens in New York!” said some people. “UK label formed by ex-private school kids throws party in New York with corporate money,” said no one. This is because behind PC music, in the form of Red Bull sponsorship, there is big, scary money.

At which point I ask of PC Music’s roll-up smoking philoso-fans, if they are now in a strict sense branded content, are they in any position to be commenting on the place of branded content? Does doing the shitty thing that you attempt to criticise actually amount to a critique of the shitty thing?

And as for the hype-tsunami? Well, the sad truth is that even with Red Bull’s backing, PC Music is a minnow compared to corporate giants like Sony. Their in-house producers will mimic the label’s trademark sound, and eventually, pop will eat PC Music, and students all over Oxford will listen to the results at bops, blissfully unaware.

Top 5 songs to mourn/celebrate the election result

0

1. ‘I’m Blue’ – Eiffel 65

“Yo listen up, here’s a story about a little guy who lives in a blue world.” Perhaps that explains their policies.

2. ‘Red’ – Taylor Swift

However sad you are about the sudden death of the Milifandom, I’m sure Ed is sadder.

3. ‘Yellow Submarine’ – The Beatles

Pretty sure Clegg would like to get into a submarine right now.

4. ‘Boulevard of Broken Dreams’ – Green Day

I don’t think this really needs explaining.

5. ‘Scotland’ – The Lumineers

Bad luck with the referendum #sorrynot- sorry. 

Review: Hop Along – Painted Shut

0

★★★★★

Five Stars

Hop Along is a remarkable find. Described as many things, varying from grunge folk to punk rock, they are unlikely to be a band you’ve heard of before. However, this Philadelphian group is driven by an entrancing energy, and their latest album, Painted Shut, is no exception. Lead singer Frances Quinlan has a powerful, rock voice, and this dominates the majority of their tracks. Their style is vaguely recognisable as punk, but taken in a different, whimsical direction.

Each song is an example of refreshingly well-done storytelling, which deflects the attention away from the singer and turns the perspective onto the subject of her tale. For the severity of the themes, which include abuse, poverty and greed, the songs are not desolate, but strangely jubilant. Quinlan’s captivating voice, which can switch between soft and raw in seconds, can lead you through a story of despair, like in ‘Well-dressed’, but leave you with a feeling of hope.

The tracks are full of intriguing but fleeting characters, spread across an unequal land- scape, where “there is nothing more danger- ous than a defeated army heading home”. It is no by means easy listening, demanding your full attention with its intricate stories and cogent emotions. However, if you’re looking for a female vocalist with the intrigue of Courtney Barnett, then Hop Along is an exhilarating choice. 

Review: Tallest Man on Earth – Dark Bird is Home

0

★★★★☆

Four stars

Tallest Man On Earth, also known as Kristian Matsoon, is the most earnest and Swedish man in the world. His new album Dark Bird is Home is a reflection of his difficult personal life over the last year, during which he lost a close friend. The album, written during his travels after his album release in 2012, is introspective, but also larger in scale than his previous work, which relied on lyrical tropes for its material.

In the title song, he sings, “There are many ways of sorrow,” and this is certainly an album concerned with sorrow, recuperation and redemption in a way that is reminiscent of the music of Fiorella, maybe even Bon Iver. However, it is also an album about connecting with people, and this is reflected musically. It is the first of his albums to employ instrumentation from other people. Until now, he has simply employed an acoustic guitar and his soulful voice, but don’t worry, the new album is no less direct and moving.

The ‘Dark Bird’ of Tallest Man On Earth has finally spread his wings, and flown gloriously away. This new album will ensure success with old fans, as well as a number of new fans too, and is an excellent addition to the discography of this particularly Swedish, particularly earnest man. 

Presidential hopes punctured

0

Candidate for the Merton JCR presidency has been released from hospital after accidentally impaling himself on a spike in the College gardens during a challenge issued by the current Vice-President during his hustings.

The two candidates competing for the post, William Tilston and Ben Holden, were blindfolded and asked to race a distance of approximately 150m through the Fellows’ Garden. The challenge was issued on the grounds that the President should know the college “like the back of their hand”.

Holden became impaled on a metal spike approximately five inches long, which was jutting out horizontally from a low wall. He told Cherwell, “It [the spike] had punctured my leg about an inch above the kneecap and gone in quite deep. The porter later told me he only realised I had impaled myself when he noticed some of my flesh… still on the bolt.”

Holden was subsequently rushed to the A&E unit at the John Radcliffe Hospital. X-rays revealed that the bolt had gone an inch and a half into his femur, dislodging a section of bone. He underwent surgery on Thursday to apply around 40 stitches so as to reduce the risk of infection.

Holden praised the College’s response to the accident, reporting how the porter on duty at the time administered first aid, and oversaw his transfer to the John Radcliffe. Additionally, the Welfare Dean and the student Welfare Reps took clothes from Merton to the hospital. On returning to College, Holden was given a ground floor room.

Holden sees the accident as being blameless, commenting, “It’s one of those things that sounds fairly perilous in retrospect considering the accident but 99 times out of 100 would have been completely fine and good fun. The blame lies with my idiocy in trying to run in a blind- fold and with sheer bad luck.”

William Tilston, the other candidate running for presidency, added, “To be honest, I felt little apprehension about the task, apart from making a conscious thought to be very careful on the few stairs there were and in general not to go too quickly. I had no qualms about the challenge then and none now. It was highly unlucky and I’m pretty sure it won’t be done again, but for things to end as they did was completely unforeseeable. I don’t think anyone was to blame, and that is the consensus around College.” 

Ruskin cuts anger students

0

Last Friday Ruskin College students held an occupation following its Governing Executive’s curriculum review in which it decided to discontinue a large proportion of its humanities department without adequately consulting them.

The Curriculum Review concluded earlier this year to reduce BA History and BA English Studies to single-year Certificates of Higher Education, after reducing its staff budget because of the “inadequate” financial situation of its main funding body, the Skills Funding Agency.

Last October, it was decided that a report by a group of students would contribute to the decisions of the curriculum review.

Students of the College were invited to meet three governors prior to the meetings with the Academic Quality and Standards Committee and the Governing Executive on Friday in order to discuss the concerns of the students.

However Matt Bevington, a student at Ruskin, told Cherwell, “We felt that it was just a box-ticking exercise and that we weren’t listened to earnestly. Therefore, we decided to enter the meeting and silently observe. We entered the meeting and were told by three different people that we were not permitted to be there and had to leave. We refused. The meeting was then moved to a different room but we were unable to gain access before security was placed on the door to keep us out. We continued our protest outside – we banged on the door and windows, put up posters, stood in front of the window. The Curriculum Review was passed without contest.”

A spokesperson for Ruskin College said, “The College went through a comprehensive curriculum review process from September. In this process we consulted with stakeholders through our committee structure, working groups and focus groups. This is a review of our curriculum for 2015/2016 to ensure that our programmes meet the on-going needs of prospective students.” 

Port and Policy conduct angers Somerville finalists

0

Loud singing after the weekly OUCA event Port and Policy has sparked two incidents in the aftermath of the General Election.

Somerville English finalists have expressed frustration over noise levels at this week’s Port and Policy after being assured that steps would be taken to keep the noise down. The previous week, a first year Port and Policy attendee was allegedly attacked after the event following a political dispute and provocative singing.

An English finalist from Somerville, who began final exams on Monday, emailed the OUCA President last week to express concerns about noise levels in advance of Port and Policy, which takes place in St Giles’ Church, across the road from his accommodation.

The President of OUCA, Maryam Ahmed, acknowledged the importance of sleep ahead of exams and promised to propose to OUCA Council that there be limits on alcohol, an outright ban on singing at the end of the meeting, limits on attendance and an announcement at the start of each event stating that shouts of ‘Shame’ disturb other students. She also said that she would propose that anyone seen exhibiting rowdy behaviour would be sanctioned by the association.

According to the students, however, noise levels this week were comparable to previous weeks.

One English finalist at Somerville, who wished to remain anonymous, told Cherwell, “At 11 o’clock last Sunday I was asleep before my first final  examination at 9.30am the next morning.

“I was awoken by a loud group singing pa- triotic songs and kept up until 11.30. It was unnecessary and added extra stress before my finals. My housemate was also woken up who also had finals at 9:30am.”

Cherwell understands that none of the proposed measures were enacted.

OUCA President Maryam Ahmed declined to comment on this issue.

This is not the first time this term that singing after Port and Policy has been contentious. According to first year student Shane Finn, he was attacked after 3rd week Port and Policy.

He claims to have been approached by two people singing ‘The Red Flag’, a traditional socialist song and the unofficial anthem of the Labour Party, just before 1am.

OUCA members, he claims, responded by singing ‘I Vow to Thee My Country’. Finn claims that he was then seized by the throat and when the attacker was pulled away, he called Finn a “traitor” to his country for being an Irish Conservative. Finn has since brought a complaint to the police.

The wake of the General Election has seen an increase in political tensions in Oxford. A number of Conservative voters have complained about the treatment they have received, especially over social media.

Some members of the Oxford Left have defended their stance, however.

NUS Disabled Students’ National Executive Committee representative James Elliott told Cherwell, “There’s a reason some Tories are shy, and that’s because voting for a government who have explicitly committed to cut benefits for disabled people isn’t something to shout about.

“I think it’s good that left-wingers in Oxford engage and debate the reactionary views of some right-wing students, who don’t make the connection that their politics has an impact on the lives of those less fortunate”. 

University pledges partial fossil fuel divestment

1

Oxford students and environmental campaigners have welcomed the University’s commitment this week to rule out any future direct investments in coal and tar sands.

In a decision on Monday by Council, the University’s executive governing body, it was revealed for the first time that Oxford currently has no direct investments in coal and tar sands, and has pledged to maintain this position in any future investment decisions.

Bill McKibben, founder of the climate campaign website 350.org, commented, “Oxford may be the greatest university on our planet, and if anyone thought its great age might keep it from shaping the future, this decision should prove them wrong. Today it has offered great leadership on the crisis of our time.”

The decision follows years of campaigning on the issue by Oxford students, academics and campaigners, with OUSU creating an official divestment campaign in Trinity Term 2013. In March of this year, a group of Oxford alumni occupied the University’s Clarendon Building in protest at Council’s decision to defer its divestment statement until this week. 41 college common rooms, representing both graduate and undergraduate students, have passed motions supporting the divestment campaign, whilst students and academics have signed open letters calling for divestment.

However, the victory for the divestment movement was only partial, as the University failed to divest from fossil fuels completely. Currently, around three per cent of Oxford’s £1.7 billion Endowment Fund is invested in the energy sector, with more than half of that proportion invested in energy exploration and extraction industries.

Andrew Taylor, a campaign manager at People & Planet, added, “If you live in the shadow of tar sand extraction and your baby [has] been air lifted to hospital after drinking the water after a spill, it doesn’t matter if under ten per cent of the culprit’s production comes from tar sands.”

The University of Oxford has also promised to incorporate for the first time a full breakdown of its sector exposure in its annual investment report, the latest of which is due to be released next month.

Critics point out that this does not go far enough as it will not disclose the specific companies Oxford invests in. In protest at Oxford’s decision not to opt for total divestment, 70 alumni plan to hand back their degrees this Saturday.

One such alumnus, Sunniva Taylor, commented, “With the decision today the University has taken a step forward, but not a big enough one. I, with others, have decided to hand back my degree, in protest.”

Vice-Chancellor Andrew Hamilton told The Guardian, “We see the main purpose of our investment fund as generating the financial resources to support our academic purpose. However, our investment managers take a long-term view and take into account global risks, including climate change, when considering what investments to make. The University believes that approach to be the right one and today’s decision reinforces it by encouraging greater engagement and reporting on this crucial issue to the environment and all of society.”

OUSU President Louis Trup welcomed the University’s decision, telling Cherwell, “I’m delighted that the University has taken a step in the right direction by pledging not to invest in coal or tar sands in the future. In the meeting, it was clear that the students who have been campaigning for this through OUSU’s Environment and Ethics campaign have changed the minds of some major critics. The work the campaign has done alongside Dan Tomlinson and Ruth Meredith [OUSU’s previous and current VPs for Charities and Community] over the past two years should be applauded.

“However, this is only the first step. Now that the University has committed to some form of ethical investment, it must continue to take further steps to ensure that its wider investments are not funding devastating environmental disasters. But all in all, today is a good day.”

Interview: Lil Jon

To those acquainted with the Atlanta crunk scene of the 1990s, Lil Jon shines out like a star on its Walk of Fame: like the gold and diamonds adoring his trademark grill, it blinds you with its brightness. Like many subcultures, crunk has been left behind in the annals of the nineties. Crunk may have died, but Lil Jon’s career has evolved with the times and continued to be extremely successful. From his early days and hits with Lil Jon & the East Side Boyz through to his work with Usher and his international hit ‘Turn Down for What’, Lil Jon continues to be a musical tour de force. He has not only survived, he has thrived.

One plausible explanation for Lil Jon’s longevity in the business is his versatility. He is certainly no stranger to sticking his fingers in a few pies at the same time. Whether it be musically, or in an entrepreneurial capacity (see his two series on the American Apprentice), his interests and talents are diverse. Looking back, his approach to the game has always been the same. His signing to So So Def Records in 1993 forged the beginning of a career that continues to flourish with no end in sight. But despite jumping between DJ sets and his original productions, his journey to success has not always progressed as smoothly as one would perceive from looking at his large back catalogue of A-list collaborators. In his eyes, he has always been the outsider in the industry.

“Throughout my career I’ve been the underdog. I’ve used all that negative energy to fuel myself and show them that I was going to do better, to be successful. The first single I did, I remember taking it to the radio station and the DJ laughing at me for having no rap on it and for having a monotone sound. They were just dissing my beat. But I knew it was a hit. I made it for the club. This one DJ said, ‘Imma play this song five times a night.’ And he played in the hottest club in Atlanta at the time. And sure enough, his repeated playing in this one club made it a hit in Atlanta. My advice is always to use that negativity to work harder and to do the best job you can do. Make the haters your motivators. I’ve been using that as my motivation for my whole career.”


Whatever motivates him, there is no denying that the business in which Lil Jon operates in has evolved dramatically. Gone are the days when you had to hire studios, pay for tape and then find some way to get your music heard beyond a mixtape given to friends. However, Lil Jon remarks that such a development has both positives and negatives. Although the freeing of recording space and internet distribution has allowed budding musicians to be heard anywhere and by anyone, he remarks such
a move has resulted in a form of oversaturation of the business. But what continues to thrive is the Atlanta scene in which Lil Jon grew up and partook. Although now, over 20 years down the line, it perplexes him at points.

“Atlanta’s artists are always so different
from anywhere else. Some of the stuff is good. But as I’m getting older, I can’t digest some of it if I’m honest. But we’ve always made catchy records. Although even if you don’t like it, you still find yourself tapping your feet to a lot of the stuff: you know the lyrics, you know the chorus. But I think for me it’s that I’m older. This is a different generation creating this music. Some of it is cool, but some of it I don’t know what the hell is going on. Although the scene is still important, I think trap is turning into the real party music now, which is pretty cool; that a hybrid of EDM and southern hip-hop has turned into its own thing now. Trap has the energy in the EDM world right now. I thought that EDM had got too commercialised for a second. Then trap came and it was fresh and new and different. I think that’s my favourite stuff right now.”

But in the changing music scene, how does someone who started his career in a completely different musical environment continue to remain on trend? To Lil Jon, the answer comes in the form of constantly remaining open to new forms of inspiration. He may have been raised on funk by his mother at her house parties, but his mind has remained constantly open to new creative sources. “From the disco, to the funk, to the soul. Everything I’ve listened to has influenced me. That’s why I feel I can jump around so much with what I do.

“I’m going to keep going with the flow, going wherever it takes me. I’m doing all types of stuff. For example, I’m doing some Arabic fusion stuff right now. I’ve been in Morocco, Beirut – all over. And those influences have been hitting me. That’s how artists are. When some influences hit you, you take it. When you can work on it, you work on it and try and make something special. I’m just going to keep doing all types of stuff and see what happens.”

One facet of the industry which has been a constant source of controversy is its treatment of
women. Rap videos have
never shied away from
their sexualised depictions
of scantily clad women gyrating on camera. Lil Jon’s latest
music video for the track ‘Bend
Ova’ continues to propagate said “tradition” as women of all shapes and sizes dance as he raps, “Wiggle that ass like it’s shaped like a jello.” But as a co-director to most of his videos, Lil Jon argues that it is the media, and not the rap game, which has problems with depicting women in such a manner.

“I think it’s just the media. I mean nowadays, women like to express themselves, they like to show off their bodies. They work hard in the gym, they want to wear that sexy dress like Beyoncé, or the other girls did at the Met Gala. They’re showing off what they want to show off.

“It’s funny, I saw a meme and it says ‘This is a picture from the AVN [Adult Video News] Awards, the porn awards, and this is a picture from the Met Gala. And all of the girls were naked at the Met Gala. So it just shows you, you know, they know what they’re doing. This is how they make a living. They know their bodies, what their body looks like. They know that people will buy this stuff if they show a little bit more skin, that’ll keep people talking. I mean look at Kim Kardashian. They probably sold a lot of magazines or whatever.”

Talk of magazines brings us onto Lil Jon’s view of corporate America. To him, the “corporate” is a world to be treated with great care and caution, only entered into when absolutely necessary.

“I guess corporate is what you call corporate. Sometimes it’s too strict, by the book. I don’t really hate ‘corporate’ America. It’s just not for me all of the time. If you’re doing something in a major way, say if I sign a television deal, I’m going to have to deal with a corporate company. I guess what I was really talking about when I said I hated corporate America is in the sense of the record company business. Being independent, being free is a better way to go than being on a major label. Because a major label wouldn’t understand me. And also major labels don’t give time for artists to develop. Artist development is just gone. They want to a song out and for people to react and if they don’t, then they just move onto the next song and the next artist. Being independent and out of that corporate environment works better for me and a lot of other artists as we can move around the way we want. We don’t get caught up in all that scheduling and this corporate way of rolling stuff out.”

As well as his solo work on such independent labels, Lil Jon specialises in drawing big names to work with him. Next on his hit list? None other than Jay-Z and Kanye West. But after so long in the game, what is that Lil Jon looks for in a collaborator? Someone doesn’t get so successful by plucking names out of thin air and hoping they share the same vibe as his own music.

“Kanye just has this certain kind of energy and his flow is just crazy. He’s also a producer, so it’d be cool to make and maybe even produce a track with him. And Jay-Z is just… damn. His lyrical style is amazing and he just kills it on every track, not matter what kind of track it is. I just think creatively we could come together and just do something really good.”

In his constant evolution, the wheels of Lil Jon’s well-trained and well-oiled music machine show no signs of stopping. His passion for music and his love of all things new suggest Lil Jon may continue producing, rapping and directing until the very end.

“Well, I look at it as God giving me this voice and this talent. And I should use it until I can’t use it no more. I mean I look at people like James Brown, who was performing until he couldn’t perform no more. I want to keep using my voice as long as I can talk. I think God put me here for the specific reason of helping people to forget about their problems for a while, to let loose and enjoy their lives a little. So that’s what my music is about. I don’t regret anything.

“This book has already been written. If something really bad happens, you pull out of it. You learn. And you keep moving forward.”

The most contentious exhibition in Britain?

0

The graceful figure of Aphrodite, crouching against the glare of the spotlight. Myron’s discus-thrower, radiantly white amongst the shadows of the room. Phidias’ marble torso of a river god, leaning against a flow of water turned to stone. The opening display at the British Museum’s Defining Beauty: The Body in Ancient Greek Art is spectacular. In one single room stand some of the most renowned and influential works of art the world has ever known. It is a room dedicated to the glorification of the human body, to the way the Ancient Greeks revolutionised the perception of nakedness and formed a new reverence for the nude. 

The room is in darkness, save for the spotlights focused on these masterpieces, and on the walls are projected quotations from some of the Western world’s most important figures; Socrates, Pythagoras, Plato, Homer, Sappho, Bacchylides, and Theognis. It reminds us that the Ancient Greeks have helped to form the society we now live in, not just through their art, but also through politics, literature, theatre, philosophy, mathematics and science. 

As the exhibition progresses, we are confronted with plaster casts of familiar statues painted and gilded in bright, patterned colours. Greek sculpture was not always a dazzling white. Traces of pigments have led experts to believe that they were brightly coloured and often heavily patterned. These modern reconstructions are shocking for those unfamiliar with this actuality. The Ashmolean Museum has had the very same display of painted ancient Greek sculpture in their Cast Gallery since January 2015. The problem with both displays remains the same nonetheless; we have no exact evidence of the colours, of the decorative designs or the way the ancient Greeks arranged these forms. The modern colour reconstructions, therefore, are no closer to the ancient reality than the commonly admired white marble.

The exhibition develops into a study of Greek society, ordinary day-to-day life, death, marriage and even the gender divide. There is an extravagant display of Greek ceramics and sculpted figurines. The exhibition exposes the influence of the Ancient Greeks not only on the Renaissance, but also on eastern art forms and the ancient kingdom of Gandhara, where it helped invent the third century AD image of Buddha.

The exhibition finishes with another two well-known sculptures; the Belvedere Torso from the Vatican Museum and the figure of Dionysus from the British Museum’s very own Elgin Marbles collection. With a range of collected sculpture from Croatia, Germany and Italy; it is noticeable that the Greeks themselves have not submitted any sculpture or artefacts for the exhibition. A large percentage of the exhibition already belongs to the British Museum, including several marble metopes and pediment sculptures from the notorious collection of Elgin’s marbles. These marbles in particular stand as examples of supreme artistic distinction amongst some of the finest samples in European art history. Yet there is the sense that this exhibition, focused on the defining of human beauty, is in fact politically
motivated. 

This rich display of Greek artefacts is a reminder to the world that the British Museum is not the only institution who owns large amounts of ancient sculpture. It professes its deep admiration and reverence for antiquity and attempts to show the way in which this ancient civilisation has shaped societies throughout the centuries, giving the entire Western world a rightful claim over its heritage. This stems from the 200 year old debate over the ownership of the Elgin Marbles, housed in the British Museum’s Duveen Gallery. 

The Elgin Marbles, hacked off the Parthenon and ‘legally’ sold to the government in 1816, have been at the centre of political tensions between Britain and Greece for almost two centuries. In the 1930s, they underwent a horrifying ‘cleaning’ causing Greek and international outrage. Ordinary housework acids were used on these 2500 year old sculptures, scraping off a layer of marble and damaging some of the detail. Despite a very frail legal claim and a newly built Acropolis museum in Athens waiting for the return of the marbles, the British government has refused to refute their ownership of these works. 

It is no great wonder then that the Greeks want nothing to do with this new exhibition. As spectacular as it is, Defining Beauty is the British Museum’s attempt to convince the world that the Elgin marbles, along with its vast collection of Greek sculpture, belongs and always will belong to them.