Thursday, May 15, 2025
Blog Page 1255

Being bisexual is not like being a unicorn

0

“Being bisexual is a bit like being a unicorn.” These words were taken from the contribution of a student to the “Bye Bi Prejudice” Facebook page, set up for the OUSU campaign of the same name. Whilst the statement is in itself light-hearted, the notion that a non-monosexual identity is somehow contradictory, illogical or simply non-existent is a persistent issue that bi/pan people both in this university and wider society face on a regular basis.

Often, people struggle to get beyond binaries of sexuality, as they sometimes struggle to get beyond the flawed concept of gender binaries. The result is that, a lot of the time, non-monosexual people are thought not quite to “belong” anywhere. On occasion, this can result in exclusion and erasure, whereby individuals don’t quite feel accepted by groups or people who identify as monosexual.

The issue of such exclusion and erasure can further lead to confusion, misunderstandings and damaging assumptions. The latter is something that I personally have found a particular struggle, both at home and in Oxford.

On being elected as the LGBTQ rep for Univ, I was asked by someone whether they thought it was appropriate for a straight woman to hold the position. The fact that I currently have a boyfriend apparently, in itself, defines my sexuality. I have been told that I “look too straight” to be bisexual, and I have also been asked uncomfortable and invasive questions about my sexual preferences.

When these comments are directed at me, I often instinctively feel the need to defend myself, as if I am some kind of fraud or a curious specimen. Whilst I cannot and do not wish to speak for all people who identify as non-monosexual, I know, from my own experiences and from the experiences shared by other students on the campaign page, that the issues raised here are real and crop up time and time again.

We need this campaign because it empowers a group of people within Oxford whose voices are very often erased. It’s frustrating and upsetting to hear that others face these issues, but also extremely comforting to know that there are others who feel the same as I do.

Through raising the profile of the problems and of non-monosexual identities themselves, and through providing a platform for students to celebrate their identities and dispel damaging stereotypes, I hope that this campaign can help to reduce significantly the prejudice that is faced by bi/pan students. In many cases, we see that uncomfortable comments and assumptions arise not out of malice, but rather from a lack of awareness or information. Ultimately, I hope that people will become more open minded about identities which often don’t fit neatly into the categories laid out by society. No one has to explain, justify, or choose their identity. 

News: Cherwell reports on OUSU’s “Bye Bi Prejudice” campaign

Union rules changes overturned a week before elections

0

Following a complaint made against Union President Mayank Banerjee’s decision to hold a Poll on electoral rules changes, which were passed by a large majority, the Returning Officer has issued an interpretation which overturns the Poll and reverses the electoral changes.

The rules changes included the introduction of a ‘Re-Open Nominations’ option on ballot papers, as well as legalizing many forms of campaigning and slates.

Explaining his actions, the Returning Officer Thomas Reynolds wrote, “it has become apparent to me that the interpretations issued by the President regarding the processes for changing the Rules are wrong.” He further stated that under the current conditions, “it is insupportable for me to run these Elections in a transparent and correct manner.”

Reynolds continued, “the validity of this Poll has been called into question and is currently the subject of an SDC [Senior Disciplinary Complaint]. The SDC cannot now meet until after the printing of ballot papers, which must either contain an option for Re-Open Nominations, or not.

“As the Returning Officer I cannot allow the integrity of the Society’s elections to be called into question when I am able to ensure an increased degree of legitimacy.”

Reynolds explained that under the Union Rules a Poll can only be held after a debate and motion at one of the Union’s Thursday debates.

He added that the decision to proceed with a Poll  “removes the right of the Members to debate any motion, to bring amendments, or otherwise to alter the motion that could then be put to a Poll if requisitioned properly.”

In the nine-page document, the Returning Officer includes annotated versions of interpretations issued by the President, declaring these interpretations variously “relying on fallacious suppositions”, “at best wrong and at worst misleadingly so” and “false.”

The interpretation concluded, “The Rules have therefore not been changed or otherwise amended, nor has any new Rule been enacted, or any old Rule repealed. The alleged Poll of Thursday 13 November has had no effect on the Society’s Rules.”

The interpretation means that all four of the Union’s senior positions will be automatically elected unopposed.

Robert Weeden-Sanz, Stuart Webber, Antonia Trent and Robert Harris were the only members to nominate for President, Librarian, Treasurer and Secretary respectively. However voters will now no longer have a chance to select ‘Re-Open Nominations’ in the election.

President Mayank Banerjee was unavailable for comment when contacted by Cherwell.

However Cherwell understands that the Senior Disciplinary Complaint against him has now been withdrawn following the interpretation.

Preview: Ridley’s Choice

0

The title of James P Mannion’s new play Ridley’s Choice is somewhat deceptive. Because in reality Ridley makes a whole multitude of choices. George Ridley is a failed playwright and a failing father. When an eminent critic slates his latest play he chooses to up sticks and live in the woods, renouncing technology and the ‘material world’. One day a young local boy films him ranting about modern society and reciting the beginning of his pseudo-philosophical new book — also called Ridley’s Choice — making him into a minor Youtube sensation. When the media hunt him down, he chooses to let them interview him. Getting more and more caught up in his illusory fame, he makes one last fateful choice….

George Varley as Ridley has all the traits of a tortured writer experiencing an extreme form of mid-life crisis, while Archie Thomson gives an energetic performance in his role as Ridley’s mysterious friend, Clive. Although this play undoubtedly revolves around these two characters (or are they really two separate characters?), the supporting roles are equally strong: for example, Ali Ackland-Snow is by turn seductive and unnerving as the journalist who never strays from her industry speak, and James P Mannion is wonderfully irritating as the local youth who takes a video of Ridley — “mate” — on his iPhone.

The script intermingles the existential with the mundane — “Do bears shit in the woods? And if so, will they respect that this is a residential area?”, Ridley humorously ponders. It raises bold issues about our age: the inescapability of technology, the shallowness of the press, the dangerous allure of fame. This story, in which almost every character is a divorcé, also makes a profound comment on the viability of lasting marriage in modern society.

The themes and tropes are familiar but knowingly so: during the relentlessly fast-paced interview scene Ridley is accused of acting out a Walden-esque fantasy, and the character of Polly is an obvious nod to hacky Murdochian style of journalism. It is satirical without being moralistic and there are no real goodies or baddies. In addition, the fourth wall is well and truly broken when Ridley starts a rant about how in his play ‘characters come in when you least expect them to just to drive the plot along’ and is interrupted by the timely entrance of his daughter.

The play will be set in the intimate Burton Taylor theatre with a semi-thrust stage, which will create a claustrophobic space, evocative of the small woodland enclave. The experimental lighting will create a fluid sense of time, which will make it impossible to gage how long Ridley has been in his forest hideout and establish the all-important dissonance between fantasy and reality. The bathetic ending leaves the audience with plenty of questions, including the extent to which the drama has merely been playing out in Ridley’s imagination.

With tickets at just a fiver, this play is definitely worth a see. Not only because original student writing deserves support, but also because it looks bloody good.

Ridley’s Choice will be on at the BT from November 25-29 at 7.30. 

Emily Russell: colours of Matisse and shapes of Malevich

0

Apastel green quadrilateral leads into a murky grey triangle, which in its turn lies next to a sombre pink hexagon. This is the complex world of ‘House’, a canvas by the young artist from Oxford, Emily Russell. The vibrant colours in her paintings are like those of Matisse and the geometric shapes, suspended on the canvas in perfect unison, are reminiscent of Malevich. However, her style is unique and exciting.

When I meet Emily Russell at the Quarter Horse café on Cowley Road, the setting for her exhibition of her artworks, she is dressed in an understatedly cool fashion. Her maroon trousers match some of the colours in her paintings. She is modest and softly-spoken.

This is the first exhibition of the young artist and the setting of a café is completely organic. The series of canvases and boards, all share the same theme of coloured geometric shapes, but are divergent in their interpretations of it: the shapes in ‘Abstract’ are less defined and slightly blurred, in another unnamed canvas the shapes are separated by thick black borders. The works are just as interesting for their differences as for their similarities and as a series they possess an over-arching architecture, which characterises her work.

The young artist has had a complicated relationship with art. She completed an Art Foundation course, but was quickly disillusioned by the fine art world, which she describes as “inward-looking and vain”. After a couple of years without any particular direction, she decided to read Theology at Harris Manchester College. She realised that this was also not how she wanted to spend her time. She says, “It was a lot of will power rather than enjoyment get- ting me through it by the end of it.”

After graduating she decided to explore art again, and currently has a part-time job as a nanny to support her real passion: painting. She is currently in the process of applying to the Royal Academy, returning to traditional art teaching in the hope that she will be “guided” and “challenged” by tutors.

Russell’s approach towards the creative process is to avoid making a “chore of what you love”, so that it “ceases to be enjoyable”. This is not to say that she does not have a structured way of going about creating her work. She tells me that she tries to paint for three to four hours each morning. “I view it a bit like practicing an instrument — even if you don’t want to do it, you do it and you do it almost without thinking about it.” When she creates she does not focus on just one painting, but normally has five or six being painted in tandem. She tends to have one canvas which she uses simply to get rid of extra paint from her brush. Bizarrely, this purely functional canvas sometimes produces the most interesting results.

It seems that the development of her particular style occurred quite naturally. She tells me, “I started painting and just discovered that I was producing geometric shapes over and over again.” Her works have progressed from small- scale paintings in acrylic to much larger-scale ones in oil. Her response to my question about her future artistic direction is surprising. She wants to turn towards more traditional forms of art, such as portraiture and more representational works. However, she assures me that she will not turn completely away from abstraction.

So why did she choose a bustling coffee shop as her exhibition space? “I always feel fairly intimidated when in I’m in a white space and just going from picture to picture and I thought it would be better if they were adding to a place, rather than being its sole attraction.” When I ask her about the names of the canvases, which have been eclectically titled, some abstractedly — ‘Space’, ‘Abstract Gerard’ — some rather figu- ratively — ‘Turtle’, ‘Fish’, ‘Stairs’, Emily explains that she uses second-hand canvases and bases the names of her paintings on what was on the canvases before she uses them.

Have her stud“ies of theology had any influence on her art? “Not evidently,” she chuckles. However, perhaps on an even broader level, her knowledge of Buddhism has informed her approach towards life: that is, to do something which she enjoys. “It was very tempting to compromise even from the outset and have the attitude that it’s impossible to make a career in art, so therefore I should go into some related field. But I was conscious that that wasn’t what I wanted to do first and foremost. We are living in one of the most affluent, privileged nations in the world. If you can’t do what you want to do here, then where can you do it?” Her words resonate far beyond this particular case and should act as inspiration for any young person trying to forge a creative career. 

Review: Red Red Meat – There’s A Star Above The Manger…

0

★★★★☆
Four Stars

There’s A Star Above The Manger Tonight becomes Red Red Meat’s first vinyl reissue this week. ‘Experimental rock’ would not do this album justice — a more accurate description would be the incredibly catchy ‘ambient post-bluegrass slide alternative boogeyblues’.

It is essentially a series of fragments, a broken picture with no directions for reassembly. The Meatheads dismantle their grooves as soon as they’ve built them, dragging you kicking and screaming through the resulting sonic mess.

But don’t get me wrong, that’s exactly what works so well with this album. It feels like the Meatheads, in a break from washing out meat trucks, ran inside — blood still dripping from their hands — and just happened to bung together whatever they found into an abyss of distorted ambience.

It’s almost impossible to pin down a top track, but ‘Chinese Balls’ comes pretty close. Starting off with a groove that seems to mould 1987 Rick Rubin/Russell Simmons Def Jam into a redo of the Baywatch theme song, you’d be forgiven for thinking you had the wrong disc, before a guitar track that sounds like it’s been strung with spools of worn-out, dirty audio tape comes in. The bridge almost breaks down into an early Pink Floyd psychedelic ramble.

For someone not usually a fan of reissues, this album really is worth the hassle.

Review: The Oxford Revue’s Christmas Party

0

★★★★☆

Four Stars

Christmas came early last night in the Simpkins Lee theatre, delivered in all its sleigh bell goodness by the Oxford Revue at the top of their game. My previous experiences of the Revue in the sweatbox that is the Wheatsheaf had given me high hopes for the evening, but this Christmas stocking of comedy went above and beyond my expectations. The performers seemed to revel in the freedom of the larger space and longer time slot, imbuing the evening with an infectious absurdity that had the audience spellbound throughout.

The show’s greatest strength lay in its variety, blending classic stand-up routines with Wogan-infused radio plays alongside moments of the absolutely surreal (without going into too much detail, I never thought I’d see that much human hair grace the stage of Oxford’s finest comedy troupe). The range of sketches was an admirable achievement in a show that has presumably been put together in a very short space of time, and it was testament to the professionalism of the performers that it came off as a cohesive, and at times almost slick, production – though, granted, professional does feel an odd choice of word to use of a show combining postman-based erotic fiction with a Tinder-inspired rock opera.

The Revue played to their strengths, alternating longer sketches and running gags with short and surreal set-pieces that managed to get their audience crying with laughter at the pure ludicrousness of what was going on. The combination of styles meant there was never a real lull in laughter or moment when you found yourself wishing for a sketch to just wrap itself up and end. If there were nerves, the Revue certainly didn’t show it; their breezy confidence meant the audience (when they weren’t desperately trying to avoid being picked on) were eating out of the palm of their hand.

To avoid sounding too sycophantic, I will admit that there were moments of imperfection among the brilliance. There were slight technical issues towards the end and a sketch about the pint of milk was, ironically, wrong about the price of milk (or am I missing the irony?). However, these were eclipsed by its much greater strengths. I genuinely can’t emphasis enough how much this show made me laugh, something I’m all too grateful for as a work-heavy 6th week hobbles to its close; despite the lack of the rumoured mulled wine and mince pies – I still want answers – the Oxford Revue’s Christmas Party proved itself to be an unmissable night of student comedy.

Drama Cuppers 2014: A Judge’s View

0

30 shows, 4 days: yes, it was that time of year again. The time of year where aspiring thesps flock to the Burton Taylor Studio for a whirlwind week of drama and heated competition. It certainly did not disappoint. As the producer of the event, I was hugely impressed with what all of the groups came up with; shortlisting the winners was by no means an easy task. Nonetheless, here’s a flavour of some of our favourite shows from the week.

Colin and Katya – Univ (Best Of Cuppers, Best New Writing)

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%10608%%[/mm-hide-text] 

As we left the auditorium after this show, one of my fellow judges had nothing to say but “That can’t possible have been written by a student.”

He was wrong about that. Jack Clover has certainly exploded onto the drama scene with this superb piece of new writing – the plot is an exquisite balance of comedy with more serious matter, which questions the portrayal of women, the judgemental nature of society and the inner-workings of culture itself. Clover’s play shows an intense amount of consideration for the audience’s emotional journey; we instantly find ourselves rooting for the hero, Colin, and his journey becomes ours.

A great test of a piece of new writing is how effectively other theatrical components are used to showcase the story. Colin and Katya certainly withstands this test. The stage design was minimalistic yet incredibly powerful, drawing the focus sharply on the story itself. As far as acting goes, there was very little to fault. There was a profound depth to all of the characters, including the narrators; the actors had carefully considered every little detail and nuance. The onstage interaction between the characters was incredibly natural, and the more abstract, physical moments were incredibly sharp and well rehearsed. The role-switching was clear and effective and the narration was engaging and perfectly paced to suit the moment. The wonderfully subtle comedic moments were perfectly timed and powerfully executed.

In short, all of the elements were there. There was very little about this play that hadn’t been well planned and creatively executed, even down to the computer keys used for tickets. Look out for these guys – we’d have paid more than £1 to see this.

Eight – Brasenose (Best Director, Best Actress)

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%10609%%[/mm-hide-text] 

Most of us had previously heard of Ella Hickson’s play Eight; eight monologues which build up a chilling portrait of the distorted nation we live in. We walked into the auditorium believing that we had a good idea of what we were about to see, but Jess Ward’s unique handling of the material was outstanding, and made Eight a real front-runner from the start.

For one thing, the monologues were not performed consecutively and in their entirety, but spliced up and woven in with one another, creating a gripping web of plot-lines and suspense. The emphasis on physical theatre was also hugely effective; the moments of ensemble were well rehearsed and created a powerful visual, using movement and subtle interaction to compliment each of the monologues. This had an incredibly disturbing effect and the heightened tension was only enhanced by the use of white masks, adding a new dimension to the play concerning the nature of identity. 

There were multiple contenders here for Best Actor/Actress. In a play 100% comprised of pieces of monologue, the finished product can only work if the actors have an in-depth understanding of the characters that they are portraying, and if these are developed well. However, there were no weak links in this cast; as individuals, each monologue was engaging and powerful. More importantly, as a group, they offered a colourful display of diversity, with each character bringing something different, and special, to the overriding story. The success of this show was a combination of innovative direction with incredibly skilled acting.

Down By Law – Wadham (Best Design, Best Actor)

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%10610%%[/mm-hide-text] 

What did we like about this one? It was daring. Any play which is dominated by space, time and silence is difficult to pull off. And luckily for these guys, we thought it worked.

Adapting a film for stage is incredibly different. Arguably, the most significant challenge is working with an entirely different visual framework. In a screenplay, you can change up the shots and angles; in a theatre you’re given a fixed space. These guys used this space extremely effectively. he set, for one thing, was magnificent. The crew had fashioned 2 sets of wooden jail bars, which were moved around the front of the stage to alter perceptions of enclosure, and to situate the audience within or without the cell – whichever fitted the moment best. The tech complimented this, utilising levels of light to mark changes in time, and culminating in an explosive finale whose staging provided a dynamic shift in atmosphere and pace.

The way the actors handled themselves really reflected the atmosphere onto the audience; time slowed right down. Ali Porteous was a worthy winner of our Best Actor award; he kept his character alive and delightfully colourful even in an environment where little interaction was offered to him. He offered a ray of hope, drawing out the best in the characters around him. He also played the audience well, with some well-timed moments of humour.

This was very ambitious yet well executed piece, which we really appreciated.

In Conclusion…

I would have liked to write a lot more. The standards were incredibly high, and just because only a handful of shows ended up winning prizes, it didn’t mean that we weren’t incredibly impressed with everyone. I just couldn’t afford to buy anymore trophies, really.

Despite what certain student publications have been telling you recently, I believe Oxford drama is worth your time and money. As I sat in the BT pretty much 24/7, it was heartening seeing the effort and care that had been invested into these half-hour slots; for me, it made all the chaos completely worth it. These students had been at Oxford for a few weeks, but amidst the subfusc and those first gruelling essay-crises they had taken the time out to assemble a team, put together a play and see it realised onstage. Their enthusiasm to integrate themselves into Oxford’s weird and wonderful world of theatre made them a joy to work with.

And watch this space; we’ve seen Macbeth and Banquo throwing shapes to Abba, we’ve had piano playing through a blackout and we’ve had a crazed director with a profound love for Barbara Streisand…

Who knows what these guys will come up with next?

Review: Mark McGuire – Noctilucence

0

★★★★☆
Four Stars

When asked to review Mark McGuire’s latest release, Noctilucence, I let out a sigh at the pretentious name. It required a concerted effort to fathom just what ‘noctilucence’ actually means (the phenomenon of clouds glowing at night — who knew?). My further discoveries of fourteen-minute songs did little to raise my hopes.

Yet Noctilucence surpassed all of my assumptions.

Its five tracks provide a stunning complexity of sound shrouded with an almost extraterrestrial undertone. Even if the weird and wonderful isn’t for you, it’s hard to deny the sheer complexity of the songs.

The album is also beautifully symmetrical. Opening track ‘Freedom of Spirit’ is reminiscent of a church choir, its ethereal vocals adding another layer to the song, ensuring that it constantly rushes up to full intensity before ebbing away. The album peaks with title track ‘Noctilucence’, which nevertheless frustrates with its long yet intense opening, before changing beautifully after four minutes into unadulterated electric guitar.

The album works incredibly well as a whole, let down only in the incredibly long introductions, which induce a sense of guilt for feeling frustrated at such beautiful music. If questioning the universe through instrumental music is for you, then McGuire’s Noctilucence comes highly recommended.