Tuesday, May 20, 2025
Blog Page 1269

Oxford faces affordable housing crisis

0

A recent report by the Centre for Cities has ranked Oxford the least affordable city to live in and recommended expansion onto the city’s green belt.

The average home price in Oxford is now 5.8 times the typical local salary and Oxford topped the ranking for unaffordable housing, beating Cambridge and London to first place.

The report urged Oxford to prioritise building on brownfield sites, which could provide 1,500 new homes, but also to develop green belt land to provide 9,500 new homes within a 25 minutes’ walk from the train station.

Significant areas of west Oxford were highlighted by the report for possible development of green belt sites. Such a solution has created controversy among members of Oxford’s student body, who stress the environmental concerns of building on the countryside that surrounds the city.

OUSU Environment & Ethics Officer Xavier Cohen told Cherwell, “We do not need to build on the green belt. We are not facing a housing crisis. We are facing a housing allocation crisis. There are over double more long term empty homes than homeless families in Britain.”

“We need to allocate houses to those who need them rather than to those who can afford to buy them.”

Cohen said, “The environment should not suffer; landlords and the increasingly wealthy rentier class should”.

However the report maintains that, in light of the housing crisis, a review of the use of green belt land is necessary. A Centre for Cities spokesman told the Oxford Mail, “The shortage of housing in Oxford has pushed up house prices, forcing residents and workers to spend more of their earnings on housing, or pricing them out of the city altogether.”

“This in turn limits the ability of Oxford’s businesses to recruit the best workers.”

The report stressed that local businesses had identified the “expansion of the city essential to support their growth”, with increased opportunities for recruitment.

Citing Oxford’s strong economic links with neighbouring local authorities, it claimed that with “well-connected land in these authorities” there would be 98,770 homes and “considerable” contributions to the wider area’s economy. Yet, the report explained that “poor co-operation of local authorities” is “a significant hindrance to economic growth” in the city.

It also noted that, “neighbouring authorities have frequently opposed the city wide Strategic Housing Market Assessment [SHMA], despite recognising the need for more housing in the area.”

The assessment stresses the focus of development on housing with strong urban transport links. In a comparative section, the report argued that Cambridge have taken on the guidance of the SHMA more successfully in growing the city.

This latest news comes a month after a group of squatters occupied the Old Power Station in Arthur Street, in West Oxford in order to host a series of events to draw attention to Oxford’s housing crisis.The squat was ended by the threat of a legal injunction from the University.

A golden opportunity for the Church of England

0

For most students, the controversies plaguing the Church of England seem absurd. In a country that has had both female monarchs and a female prime minister, it is bizarre that, until this year, one of our foremost institutions legally barred women from reaching its top ranks. Looked at in that light, it seems obvious that the Church should appoint a female bishop straight away, so that the process of reversing years of inequality and oppression can begin as quickly as possible. This is certainly the position I hold, and one I expect most readers do too.

Yet, the Church of England is curiously adverse to sudden change and there is a feeling in certain parts of it that appointing a woman to one of the top episcopal posts, namely the bishopric of Oxford, would be too far, too fast.

A better solution, they might argue, would be to appoint a woman to a more junior episcopal post and take things from there. This uneasiness at the speed with which things are happening is shown by an online poll on The Oxford Times website. At the time of writing, as many as 37% of respondents think that the next Bishop of Oxford should not be a woman.

However, this softly-softly approach is exactly the reason why the Church of England is seen as increasingly irrelevant in the modern world. At best, their fear of offending anyone and subsequent dithering has led to them being seen as an impotent force, standing for nothing, contributing nothing to contemporary debate.

At worst, it has made them look like reactionaries of the most bigoted sort, supporting all kinds of discrimination, whether against women or members of the LGBTQ community.

It is time for the Church of England to wake up, to realise that they need to take the lead and make bold statements. Appointing a woman to one of England’s top bishoprics would be one such statement; it would show the public that the church stood for progress and equality, and would undo some of the damage caused by the rejection of woman bishops the first time round.

However, in all this excitement, we are at risk of forgetting the other battles that need to be won in the Church of England and, in particular, the failure of the Church of England to appoint an openly gay bishop.

This issue has been sidelined by the issue of women bishops, but is just as important, and has just as controversial a history. Jeffrey John, after all, was on track to be the first gay bishop in 2003, when he was appointed to the Bishopric of Reading, but withdrew his acceptance after controversy.

It doesn’t matter too much whether the Church appoints a gay bishop, or a female bishop, or indeed a gay female bishop. But whomever they appoint, the message they send should be clear: We have changed, the old prejudices are gone and we have arrived in the Twenty First Century.

page1image65496

 

Is F1 about to hit the barriers?

0

To the eye of an unsuspecting student, Formula One is a sport that — with its glitz and glamour — is the very epitome of wealth and excess. Take more than a cursory glance though, and the picture becomes far murkier. In the last month two teams, Marussia and Caterham, have found themselves unable to fund the travel and the high-tech engineering that characterizes the pursuit, whilst the future is uncertain for several more teams, including Force India and Lotus. This turmoil of course comes on the back of what was perhaps F1’s darkest moment in 20 years — Jules Bianchi’s life-threatening crash in Japan — and this reminder of the sport’s proximity to mortality couldn’t have come at a worse time. If teams are bankrupting themselves to risk their lives in a sport that can barely call itself competitive any more, can we really support it continuing in its current form?

Thinking about the ownership structure of the two teams in dire straits is also illustrative of the structural issues which plague the so-called “pinnacle of motorsport”: Caterham were, until last summer, owned by the Malaysian tycoon Tony Fernandes; whilst Marussia were similarly beholden to the now-defunct Russian carmaker of the same name. Both teams attempted to use top level auto-racing as a marketing tool for a supposedly growing car manufacturer, and both teams came up short. F1 is no longer a profitable or successful tool unless you are able to pump hundreds of millions of pounds into your team as the likes of Ferrari, Red Bull, and Mercedes do.

The reality is simple: the competition has been distorted irretrievably by money. This year’s title race has been a problematic example of the fact that unlimited spending is not a guarantee of a competitive championship. Although Lewis Hamilton and his German teammate Nico Rosberg have been relatively closely matched, the Mercedes car they share has been head and shoulders  above the competition.

Whilst their Mercedes is no doubt a technical marvel, this season has hammered home the fact that unparalleled technical excellence alone is not enough to make a sport compelling. (Although, arbitrary ‘entertainment- focused’ rules such as awarding double points to the victor of the year’s final race leave a sour taste in the mouth, too.)

Where now? As this season draws to a close there is a very real danger of there being less than 16 cars on the starting line come March 2015. If this were to be the case, the contracts between the FIA, Bernie Ecclestone’s Formula One Management, the remaining teams, and the circuits would start to creak. Three car teams are a very real possibility, but it seems as though that would only exacerbate the funding chasms at the top table of F1, as only the richest teams able to run a third car and to reap the benefits that would bring.

As it stands then, the now long-deposed Max Mosley — the former head of the FIA who attempted to bring in massive cost-saving measures including a budget cap — might be forgiven for feeling a little smug. This sport, the purest form of sporting capitalism, is out of control, and has further to fall.

A year that started promisingly with new eco-conscious regulations and the announcement that Japanese behemoth Honda would restart its involve- ment has turned into something of an annus horriblis. The only real option requires the likes of Ecclestone, and Mosley’s successor Jean Todt to take decisive action: costs need to come down and stay down; double points style gimmicks need to be eliminated; and starting from the bottom — whether as a team, driver, or even a mechanic — needs to become possible once more. And, it goes without saying, the Jules Bianchi crash needs to prompt some serious soul-searching.

Real Tennis: Tennis, but not as you know it…

0

The game we now generally call tennis or ‘Lawn Tennis’ is actually a late Victorian creation, a variation on the much older game now known as ‘Real Tennis’ (that is, ‘genuine’ or ‘original’) to distinguish it from the newer game. Real Tennis is approximately 1000 years old and probably started in Tuscany in the Eleventh Century.
Real Tennis was hugely popular in England, and all over Europe, in the Middle Ages, and played throughout society. It began as an outdoor game, using streets and courtyards. When enclosed courts were built from the thir- teenth century, some of these architectural features were incorporated.
For the first 500 years, tennis was played with the hand, but wooden racquets became the norm from the mid-Sixteenth Century. Racquets are still wooden and balls are handmade.
Real Tennis is notable for having the first World Championship of any sport, dating from the 1740s. The current Men’s World Champion, Rob Fahey, is Australian, and the Women’s World Champion, Claire Vigrass, is English. To see professionals play, look at the Real Tennis World Championship, Melbourne, 2014, Day 4, on YouTube. As in boxing, contenders play each other for the right to challenge the incumbent World Champion.
The Oxford University Tennis Club is based at Merton College. The Oxford court, England’s second oldest, dates from 1798 and is the sole survivor of the many that existed in the city. Of the thousands of medieval courts across Europe, few remain. Currently, there are only 26 courts still ‘in play’ in the UK, and others in Australia, France and the USA bring the world total to just 45. Renovation and construction continues. The court in Chicago (built 1922, closed 1933) re-opened in the summer of 2012 and Radley College’s 2008 court, just outside Oxford, is the world’s newest. Today, the game is thriving and more courts are needed.
No two Real Tennis courts are exactly alike, although almost all have common features. The court is divided by a net, forming the ‘service’ side and the ‘hazard’ (receiving) side. Serving only ever takes place from one end, the serve must be earned and the game has a significant server’s advantage. A serve, which may be hit over-arm, under-arm, forehand or backhand, is indirect, and must bounce at least once on the sloping roof of the hazard penthouse to be valid.
As in Lawn Tennis, players can lose points by hitting the ball into the net or out of court, but points can be won by hitting the ball into specific areas of the court too. The scoring system of Lawn Tennis was adapted from Real Tennis, but simplified.
Although the rules of Real Tennis are complicated, they are part of this historic game’s appeal. Both singles and doubles matches are played and may be contested by men, women or both. Every player has a handicap (like golf) and there is an effective system for ensuring that players of different standards can play competitive games.
The Oxford University Tennis Club is thriv- ing and friendly and new players are most welcome. Playing and membership are not restricted to Oxford University students and staff, and Brookes students, local enthusiasts and visitors use the court, which is open seven days a week from 08.00-22.30. 

All in the timing: heat turned up on Qatar 2022

0

That the upcoming 2022 Qatar World Cup is controversial goes without saying. The method by which Qatar won the bid and its treatment of migrant workers in particular have raised troubling questions. It seems, however, that the sheer popularity of the event will trump all ethical concerns in determining its success: in the recent World Travel Market 2014 Industry Report, roughly two-thirds of the travel industry believes that tourists will flock to the competition in eight years’ time. 

The biggest challenge to the success of the World Cup remains the timing of the competition. During the bidding process, Qatar promised that its research into stadium-cooling techniques would prove fruitful come 2022, and the tournament could go ahead during the traditional summer months, despite an average daily high June temperature of forty one degrees Celsius. This flew in the face of FIFA’s own technical report, which warned that the summer period would be too warm to host an international event such as this; the high temperatures have also partly been responsible for the deaths of many migrant workers.

FIFA have announced that they are considering two options for the timing of the World Cup — January/February or November/December — after Sepp Blatter, President of FIFA, was forced to investigate alternatives following outcries from UEFA, top European clubs, and leading national leagues. Moreover, one of the biggest concerns is that the revised World Cup will clash directly with the Winter Olympics. The dates for this tournament have not been finalised; however, with the Sochi Olympics running from 7th-23rd February there is a strong chance of a clash between the tournaments. This is despite Blatter promising his counterpart at the International Olympic Committee, Thomas Bach, that no such thing would happen. The other option being considered would also clash with club fixtures, such as the Champions’ League and all European football leagues.

The two options revealed do not include the proposed compromise offered by the Euro- pean Club Association: April/ May 2022. This would offer minimal disruption to the current footballing calendar, with leagues starting two weeks earlier than usual, more midweek games, and fewer international breaks. FIFA argued that this would not avoid health and safety issues related to the heat, but the average temperature during this time period, thirty-two degrees Celsius, is not too far off the temperatures witnessed in Brazil earlier this year. 

The most worrying factor against this proposal would be that it would clash with the start of Ramadan on the third of April, ending on the second of May. As Sharia law is the main source of legislation in Qatar, eating and drinking in public is illegal during this month, making the prospect of hundreds of thousands of rowdy football fans gathering in the country for the month unappealing to say the least. 

The taskforce convening on this issue will make its recommendation by March 2015. What is clear by now is that the best possible option — not holding the World Cup in Qatar at all — is off the table, barring conclusive, irrefutable proof that the bid was bought and paid for by the Qatari bid team. 

Memorial to former Czech president unveiled in Oxford

0

A memorial to the former Czech President, Václav Havel, was yesterday unveiled at Oxford University Parks. The ceremony coincides with this month’s 25th anniversary of the 1989 Velvet Revolution, which brought an end to over four decades of communism in what was then Czechoslovakia.

Dignitaries from the Slovak and Czech Republics, including the two nations’ ambassadors to the United Kingdom, were present at the unveiling of ‘Havel’s Place’, as were four current Czech cabinet ministers.

Commemorating the first democratically elected leader of his nation following the communist era, ‘Havel’s Place’ at Oxford is an initiative of the Oxford University Czech and Slovak Society (OUCSS), and supported by the Czech and Slovak embassies. Funding was provided by Mr LudÄ›k Sekyra, a Czech businessman and Foundation Fellow of Harris Manchester College.

In a nod to the spirit of free discussion and debate that Havel championed, the memorial takes the form of two seats linked by a round table through which grows a Linden Tree, the national tree of Havel’s homeland. It is the work of Czech designer, BoÅ™ek Šípek.

The table is inscribed with Havel’s 1989 campaign slogan, ‘Truth and love must prevail over lies and hatred’.

Czech ambassador to the UK, Michael Žantovský, served as an advisor to Havel and is the author of a new biography of the former President. He told Cherwell that the “very modest” monument would be “a place of meditation, of reflection.”

He added, “It symbolises Havel’s devotion to the reflective process — the process of concentrating on our inner identity and our inner responsibility. It’s for everyone to draw conclusions for himself. There is no prescription in ‘Havel’s Place’ for what one should think about there.”

Walter Sawyer, Superintendent of the University Parks, said, “The parks’ Curators rarely agree to erecting any kind of structure to mark the life or work of an individual”. However they felt Šípek’s structure, entitled ‘Democracy Talks’, was “an inspired format.”

Sawyer added, “We chose a space near to the pond in the Parks as it is a quieter, more reflective area. One can sit overlooking the pond and river, but similarly the memorial can be turned to look into the adjoining copse of trees, or across the Parks to the city.

“The seats can be swivelled for the sitters to look inwards at each other, or to look outwards. The permutations are almost endless and the Curators hope that the seat will be used in the spirit that it was gifted to us for discussion and debate.”

With this week’s unveiling, Oxford joins Washington DC, Dublin, Prague, Barcelona and Venice as one of a network of cities to host a ‘Havel’s Place’ in memory of the former Czech president who died in 2011. The network was kick-started by Petr Gandalovič, Czech ambassador to the United States.

Hailed by former US Secretary of State, Madeleine Albright, as “one of the most important figures of the 20th century”, Havel was instrumental in the toppling of communism in his country.

Ambassador Žantovský said, “Havel’s historic significance is enormous, as both a leader of the resistance to the communist regime and as leader of the Velvet Revolution. And after that as leader of the country, who oversaw its enormous changes to liberal democracy, a market economy, the rule of law and Czech integration into Western international institutions, be it NATO or the European Union.”

The Ambassador also highlighted Havel’s ties to Oxford, saying, “There are faculty in Oxford whom he knew very well and for whom he had a very high regard.”

Among them were the late philosopher, Isaiah Berlin, as well as Timothy Garton Ash, Professor of European studies, “who was a witness of the revolutionary events in 1989 and became a friend and confidant of Havel.”

In October 1998, the President received an honorary Doctorate of Civil Law from the University.

At that time the playwright-statesman also attended a ceremony at Magdalen College and conferred honours on a number of Oxford academics for their work in establishing an underground education network in Czechoslovakia, facilitating the study of material considered subversive by the communist regime.

Roger Scruton, Visiting Professor at the Department of Philosophy and Fellow of Blackfriars Hall, was awarded the Medal of Merit (First Class) of the Czech Republic. In the mid-1980s, he had been arrested by communist authorities and placed on the ‘Index of Undesirable Persons’.

Prof Scruton told Cherwell, “Havel is one of the few examples of somebody who emerged as a leader of his nation without having that ambition and without having any desire for power at all. He is a symbol of another type of politics.

“He was an ordinary, decent person motivated by conscience rather than a desire to control things. He stands as a symbol of an honourable politics that the Czechs wish their country to represent.”

Former President of Magdalen and Chairman of the Jan Hus Educational Foundation that established the underground university, Anthony Smith, was “delighted to know that Oxford is commemorating Havel.”

Kryštof Vosátka, President of OUCSS, commented, “The lessons of Václav Havel continue to resonate even as many countries, including ours, often turn a blind eye to the transgression of human rights in seeking economic advantage.

“His legacy is that of firmness in the face of blatant injustice and oppression, a firmness which never resorts to violence yet remains vocal and persistent.”

Mr Vosátka also sees a wider significance in having a monument to Havel at Oxford. He added, “The freedom to study anywhere in the world, including the famous English universities, is one of the important outcomes of the Velvet Revolution.

“Among other things, Havel’s Place is thus an expression of the right to pursue good education, which Havel recognised as the necessary part of any society.

“Its significance in Oxford derives also from Havel’s unfaltering defence of the principle of human rights, along with his personal example of intelligent, non-violent political dissent against authoritarian interests: Oxford being one of the global centres of studying and debating politics, we believe that this modest memorial is more than suitable here.”

The Chancellor of the University, Lord Patten, said, “I was delighted to hear about the unveiling of “Havel’s Place” in Oxford. Vaclav Havel was one of the bravest champions of pluralism and democracy in Europe in the second half of the last century. The triumph of liberal pluralism over authoritarianism was the result of the courageous actions of Havel and others like him.

“When I say that, however, I should also add that there were not many like him because, as well as his political actions, he wrote brilliantly about his ideals. Wherever people campaign and fight for freedom Havel offers inspiration and encouragement – and that includes Hong Kong today.”

More free Wi-Fi hotspots to be introduced in Oxford

0

Over 40 public buildings in Oxford are set to transform into free Wi-Fi hotspots for tourists, residents and students by March of next year in plans unveiled last Thursday.

The proposal to introduce free Wi-Fi into institutions like Modern Art Oxford, Park and Ride sites and the County Hall, come as part of a planned £150m government investment across the UK.

This new Wi-Fi will not only benefit the tourists who visit Oxford’s world-famous museums and institutions, but Oxford University students themselves.

Leader of the City Council Bob Price explained how this new wider Wi-Fi coverage would directly advantage the student population.

He said, “Free City Centre Wi-Fi will mean that students can use all personal devices in the main facilities in the central area and have access to all web enabled systems.”

He continued to describe how these networks would also be extended further across the city to ensure that other areas are equally enabled for all- not just students and visitors, but residents and businesses also.

This could resolve the issues with Eduroam that plague some Oxford students, particularly when connecting to this cross-campus network via their mobile phones.

Fresher Pascal Foster complained of the unreliability of the current Wi-Fi network outside of college for him, saying, “Since I arrived here, Eduroam has been temperamental at vital moments when I needed to contact tutors, mainly when trying to access my emails through my mobile whilst walking between lectures or classes. It either refuses to connect or quickly loses connection.”

As a result he would be keen- like others who have found Eduroam can prove erratic- to find an alternative wireless solution when out and about in Oxford, however he doubted whether these particular new plans would impact him.

He added, “I’m not sure how far the Wi-Fi zone extends or how easily accessible it will be, but I’m unlikely to frequently visit the public places where it will be offered as I always seem to have so much on, so I’m not sure if t will improve my internet situation outside of college!”

However, History student Flora Raybould was quick to praise the new proposals, commenting, “I haven’t actually found Eduroam too problematic, but even so I think this new free Wi-Fi is a great way of encouraging students to visit different facilities in Oxford; either to work in or to look around.

“It’s also a great way of helping to integrate the student population into the Oxford community as it is something that will benefit all those who live, study and work in or are visiting here.”

The question of whether this new Wi-Fi will inspire students to visit more public institutions is definitely up for debate, as there are hopes that these proposals will not only positively impact those who connect to the new networks but the institutions that offer them.

Oxford Ice Rink, which already provides free Wi-Fi in its café, has said that the free network has played an important role in attracting more student customers and so has had a very important impact on their business.

Hopefully this will be the case for dozens of other institutions by this coming March, when their Wi-Fi networks are completely established.

Oriel has flooding problems in freshers’ accommodation

0

Freshers housed in newly refurbished Oriel accommodation have had problems with their water supply and sporadic flooding due to ongoing construction work,

A history undergraduate commented, “there was a burst water pipe yesterday as a result of construction work, cutting off all water in the Rhodes building for several hours. This followed several days when the water had been randomly switched off intermittently and one day when there was only cold water.”

Speaking on Wednesday 5th November, he said, “Yesterday things got especially bad. Basically for some unknown reason all the taps came back on in a bathroom, causing it to flood and water poured down on the floor below through the light fittings, which was a major health and safety hazard. As it’s such an old and creaky building it really exposed its structural weaknesses. The water was three or four inches thick”

Another first-year commenting on f looding problems last week, said, “My room wasn’t that bad but there was definitely an excess of water. There had been no hot water all day so someone had turned a tap on and not turned it off again so when the water came back on their room flooded and so my room flooded. We went from no water to too much water pretty quickly! Luckily I escaped anything major though.”

Matt Hull, a first year at Oriel said, “Lately the water supply has been disconnected on a periodic basis, owing to works being done on the third quad. While it was disconnected, someone tried turning on the tap, but forgot to turn it back off before the supply came back on… Cue flooded bathroom etc.”

The Grade II listed building is part of St Mary’s Quad in Oriel College and faces onto High Street opposite St Mary’s Church. The construction work started in June 2013 and was due to finish in September of this year. While the bedrooms have all been finished, work is ongoing on seminar rooms and a new cardio gym on the ground floor.

Oriel’s third quad is currently still a building site, while builders put down new stonework and grass, a project that includes the levelling out of the lawn where croquet is played in Trinity term. As a second year commented, “The sacrifice of a few freshers rooms is necessary so that our new croquet lawn can be pitch-perfect.”

The project is intended to conserve the Rhodes building for the Twenty First Century, providing more and better undergraduate rooms as well as wheelchair access to all three quads on the college’s main site. The construction work caused problems last year when a crane was p l a c e d and removed in the quad resu l t i ng in noise disruption for stud e n t s living in the surrounding acc o m modation

When contacted by Cherwell, both the JCR president and Oriel College declined t o comment.

Calls for the new bishop of Oxford to be a woman

0

Following a vote by the Church of England in July to allow female bishops, Rev Canon Rosie Harper has argued that after the forthcoming retirement of the current Bishop of Oxford, the Rt Rev John Pritchard, the post should be given a woman.

The Rev Harper explained “We’ve got to look to the future… Obviously, you look for the best person for the job but having made the decision to have women bishops, the Church has to enact it not just leave it on the back burner.

“Oxford is seen as one of the senior posts, and the pressure is to give women more junior bishop jobs, however there are some very experienced and talented women and I see no reason why one of them might not be found to be the best person for the role.”

A public meeting will be held in Christ Church Cathedral on 11th November for people to give their views to the Church of England’s Appointment Secretaries, though the new bishop is unlikely to be enthroned until the end of 2015.

Until then the role will be held temporarily by the Bishop of Dorchester, the Rt Rev Colin Fletcher, who looked after the post before the appointment of Bishop Pritchard in 2007.

The Rev Fletcher commented, “It is very exciting that for the first time in history the new Bishop of Oxford could be either a woman or a man, but as the Rev Canon Rosie Harper says the key is thing is to find the best person for the job and a great deal of thought and prayer will be going into that over the coming weeks and months”.

Hertford College Chaplain the Rev Gareth Hughes explained “There are six suffrage bishop posts also vacant (assistants to diocesan bishops), but there seems to be a will for the first woman bishop not to be appointed to one of these junior posts. The ‘stained-glass ceiling’ has left the Church of England with many talented women priests in the senior posts of archdeacons and cathedral deans and canons, and it is from among them that the first women bishops are likely to be appointed.

“The appointment process is complex, but there is desire among the bishops to have a woman among their number as quickly as possible, after the first vote for women bishops was an embarrassing failure. Oxford Diocese is well placed to get the first woman bishop in the church, but could be beaten to it.”

Chaplain Hughes added “Research shows that there are two main reasons why many people, and specially younger people find the Church of England distasteful. One is sexism and the other is homophobia. Saying that we are inclusive is not enough. We need to act in inclusive ways. This will mean actually making some women bishops.” The new bishop will be selected by the Church of England’s Oxford Vacancy in See committee, which includes both clergy and laity. Members of the public may suggest candidates by contacting the Appointment Secretaries.

Six members of the committee, at least three of them lay people will be voted onto the Crown Nominations Committee, alongside the Archbishops of Canterbury and York and members from the Houses of Laity and Clergy.

Apart from Oxford itself, the Oxford Diocese also spans Berkshire and Buckinghamshire.

Anger at proposed Campsfield expansion plans

0

Larry Sanders, Green Party parliamentary candidate for Oxford West and Abingdon has sent Cherwell a strongly worded statement about the proposed plans to expand the Campsfield House Immigration Removal Centre in Kidlington.

Proposing to more than double the capacity for incarceration, from 276 to around 600, expansion plans for Campsfield House would turn it into what Sanders calls a “mini-Guantanamo”. He also says that: “Locking up 300 more asylum seekers without charge or hearing or crime proved is contrary to British traditions of justice and meaningless in face of the total mess created by the Home Office.”

Striking out against the Conservative & Lib Dem government’s plan, Sanders says that it’s “an expensive part of its attempt to win votes back from UKIP” whilst Bill MacKeith, of the Campaign to Close Campsfield calls it “wrong, inhumane and unnecessary”.

Student societies such as Amnesty International also voice their condemnation of the plans. Paul Ostwald, Amnesty International Press Officer, said “Larry Sanders is right in proposing that the solution is not constructing more cells, but enabling a more effective judicial process for asylum seekers”. Whilst Vera Wriedt, on behalf of OMS (‘Oxford Migrant Solidarity’) believes that “the expansion of Campsfield means the expansion of a racist regime which excludes, incarcerates and even kills those who are deemed not to belong… Campsfield should be closed down, not expanded.”

Larry Sanders is not alone in the local political sphere in standing up and vocally opposing Campsfield and the plans for expansion. Conservative MP Nicola Blackwood clearly demarcates her position by posting on her website that “doubling the size of Campsfield would be wrong for Kidlington and wrong for detainees”.

Ending his letter sent to Cherwell last week, Larry Sanders said: “The Green Party wants all the Detention Centres closed and for the refugees to be with their families while waiting for speedy and fair hearing.” Concerning his constituency and voters as a whole, he believes that “taxpayers don’t want to waste tens of millions of pounds on the building plus tens of millions every year while the Government says there is no money for an adequate NHS or affordable housing or even food for the thousands queuing at Food Banks.”