Sunday, May 18, 2025
Blog Page 13

Youth and Spares complete, time for the Boat Race

0

The stage is set for the Boat Race on Sunday 13th April. Last week, the Youth Boat Race returned for its second ever outing, after enjoying successful participation in 2024. Hosted at the Fulham Reach Boat Club, 64 state schools contributed rowers to form the teams that competed over the course of the sunny Saturday morning and afternoon. While some schools formed composite crews to ensure maximised access, others put their own out. After preliminary time trial races in the morning, four side-by-side races took place with friends and family lining the banks to support. 

Adam Freeman-Pask, the CEO of Fulham Reach Boat Club offered a positive comment: “Today isn’t just about racing—it’s about the opportunity to take part, make friends, build a community, and share the journey of these incredible young athletes taking to the water. This event, inspired by the iconic Boat Race, shows that rowing belongs to everyone. Whether you’re racing, supporting, or volunteering—thank you for being part of this journey.”

Mayor Patricia Quigley also praised the growth the event had seen in just one year: “This is about more than sport. It’s about creating opportunities for young people to support one another, to build confidence, and to be part of something bigger than themselves. It’s inspiring to see how far this event has come.”

All participants were given medals in the spirit of widening participation and access.

Moving on to Wednesday, the spare pairs raced in a day that’s slightly less positive if you’re on the Oxford side. Both the men’s openweight and lightweight pairs were beaten by their Cambridge counterparts. In fact the only time Cambridge lost was when they raced themselves. After Oxford pulled out of the women’s lightweight pair in opposition of Lucy Harvard’s – the CUBC’s women’s president’s – eligibility, the Cambridge lightweight pair rowed against their openweights. Harvard had already been declared ineligible for any Blue, reserve (Blondie) or lightweight crew due to the twelve year rule – in order to be eligible, you must have matriculated twelve years ago or earlier. Oxford also wanted to race in a coxed four, rather than pairs but Cambridge insisted that while they might bend to a four, Harvard would race either way.

As squabbling continues and tensions rise, all eyes now turn to the lightweight races on Saturday, and the Blues and reserve races, set to take place on Sunday.

The schedule is as follows: 

Lightweight races on Saturday 12th April:

Women’s: 12:51

Women’s Vets: 13:11

Men’s Vets: 13:31

Men’s: 13:51

Race-day on Sunday 13th April:

Women’s Blues: 13:21

Osiris vs. Blondie: 13:36

Isis vs. Goldie: 13:51

Men’s Blues: 14:21

Find coverage on BBC One, BBC iPlayer or on the Boat Race Official YouTube channel.

Men’s Blues Hockey survive back-to-back relegation playoffs

0

The heights of the BUCS Premiership are that which most university sports clubs around the country can only dream of. These leagues are often dominated by the usual suspects – Loughborough, Nottingham, Birmingham, et cetera. So it’s always exciting to have an Oxford team competing at the same level, despite the apparent academic rigour. On Wednesday 9th April, the hockey Men’s Blues beat Cardiff Met 4-2 in the BUCS Premier playoff to stay up for another year thanks to a hat-trick from second-year Alex Adair and yet another goal in ‘Blue’s Performance Athlete’ Caspar Beyer’s debut season for OUHC. 

The Men’s Blues first achieved promotion to BUCS Prem in 2022, and the 2024-25 season marked their third year at the level. For all three seasons, they’ve come 8th out of nine teams. The BUCS Prem format means that the last-placed team gets automatically relegated, whereas the second-to-last team plays a playoff match for the chance to stay up. In 2022-23 this didn’t happen, but last year it was the narrowest of margins that saw them survive after their 2-2 draw with Cardiff Uni was sent to shuffles. This year, while the scoreline was more comfortable, the game itself was far from it. 

After a goalless and cagy first half, Adair smashed home the opener with a volley that resembled a front-foot jab, straight out of the cricketing textbook. Beyer, desperate not to be outdone, slotted home a drag-flick not long later to double Oxford’s lead – a demoralising goal for Met summarised by the frustration on their Instagram story: ‘Oxford taking their minimal chances’ was the caption. Supposedly cruising at 2-0, the jubilation was cut short when a tidy routine from Cardiff Met at a short corner saw a reverse deflection sent flying into the roof of the net to reduce the lead back to one. 

Adair would step up once again as the ball would drop to him with a yard or so of space near the edge of the circle, and he pushed it neatly into the corner past the keeper’s outstretched, last-ditch effort. There would be another twist in the tale, as Met would dispatch another corner, this time shifting the ball onto the main threat’s reverse and thumping into the far corner past keeper and postman. At 3-2, with just minutes remaining, Met pull their keeper, aiming to take advantage of having an extra man. Ultimately this would prove futile, and as Oxford latch onto the ball in midfield, Adair is slotted through for what would be his most simple goal of the afternoon, finding the empty backboard and wheeling away to celebrate the now certain victory.

A comparison in facilities between Oxford and their competitors in BUCS Prem is testament to the achievement of staying up for another year, even missing last year’s captain Archie Vaughan for the final all-important match. As Edinburgh come up to fill the last remaining spot for BUCS Prem 2025-26, Oxford will be hopeful to continue the streak of seasons spent at the top level, having survived ahead of them just a few years ago in 2022-23.

Varsity a knockout for Oxford Boxing

0

After turning the bastion of free speech into the bastion of free-flowing punches, Oxford University Amateur Boxing Club took over the Oxford Town Hall triumphantly on Friday of Week 8, only a few short weeks after Town vs Gown. Whereas town had gotten the best of gown in that particular showdown, OUABC bounced straight back to a resounding 10-4 victory over Cambridge in ruthless fashion. Ruthless not only in the margin of victory, but the manner too, as Ciaran O’Loan’s absolutely brutal knockout came just seconds after the bout began, and men’s captain Ade Olugboji had his fight stopped after raining blow after raining blow cascaded down onto the head of his Tab opposite number, until the referee had finally seen enough. In fairness, I’m not sure what else you would expect when lining up against the BUCS Championship gold medallist…

With almost 500 attendees piling into the chamber, it was an event of great numerical and historical magnitude, as it saw the first instance of four women’s fights on the main card in the 117 years that the varsity boxing match has been held. Amongst those were four included Alice Ledzion, who waltzed round her opponent almost untouched, picking her off to such a calculated degree that the judges were faced with little choice but to announce her unanimously victorious. Jasmine Guo also won her bout, bouncing back from defeat at the Town vs Gown event to pull through a fierce contest between her and Ka Ching Shelly Lee that featured some close-quarters-combat in the second round, with Shelly Lee pinned with her back to the ropes. 

While some fighters like Guo bounced back after an earlier Town vs Gown loss, Michael Cheng was one of only two boxers to win at both after beating Rhys Honey-Jones. His relentless pressure was too much for his Cambridge counterpart, as Honey-Jones simply couldn’t get anything to stick. Just like Ledzion who started off the evening, the decision was ultimately unanimous. Yet trawling through the footage of the bouts, I noticed that in the sea of 6-7GB files, two stood out as shorter than the others. I have already mentioned Ade Olugboji and Ciaran O’Loan, but the ferocity on show from those two is worth a second mention. Olugboji’s electric movement (both head and body) and vicious combinations are enough to make a second-hand viewer nervous – the standing count spelling the end of the night for his opponent. 

Ciaran O’Loan’s devastating left meant that not only was he the second boxer to win at both Town vs Gown and varsity, but he was also left without an opponent after merely ten seconds – a time so short that by the laws of Cherwell style guide, I have to write out in full. This clip has garnered serious attention, and at the time of writing, a reposted edition of the clip on Overtime Boxing’s TikTok account has 42,000 likes and 427,000 views in just three days. As user _Frank_the_Duck_ rightly points out in the comment section of the post: ‘Man said “hold this comma”.’ Although I’m more inclined to agree with Vinnie the Chinchilla: ‘Why would anyone want to risk brain damage when they are ALREADY AT OXFORD OR CAMBRIDGE?’ I suppose if you’re Ciaran O’Loan, you’re not the one at risk.

EDI report reveals less than one in ten Oxford professors are BME

0

Just 9% of professors at the University of Oxford identify as BME (Black and Minority Ethnic), according to a recent report. The Equality, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) Report provides an insight into the diversity data held by the University.

The report additionally reveals gender disparities at the top level of the University, with women making up just 22% of statutory professors, a figure that has remained stable since last year. Statutory Professors are the most senior level of academic appointment at Oxford, providing academic leadership within departments and in the wider University.

Diversity statistics on the attainment of first-class honours also feature. It shows that the first-class attainment rate for white men is 19% higher than that of BME women. Across the board, the University aims to reduce the attainment gap between all men and women to 4.4% by 2025 – the current figure stands at 10.2%, higher than the University of Cambridge’s gap of 7.0%.

On the shortcomings represented by the data, the Student Union (SU) told Cherwell: “While gaps, such as the gender attainment disparity, remain concerning, we will continue to work with the University – through initiatives like the Access and Participation Plan – to ensure meaningful action follows.”

The EDI Report is part of the University’s long-term commitment to meeting its Equality Objectives. Oxford launched its EDI Strategic Plan in October 2024, as a roadmap to improve representation and inclusivity at the University. The plan was drawn up on recommendations from staff, internal research, and other institutional change programmes.

Dr Mahima Mitra co-authored the Breaking Barriers report, which has proposed recommendations to the EDI approach taken by Oxford. Mitra told Cherwell that one area of notable progress has been “improved reporting and support in relation to bullying and harassment,” as well as perceived improvements in gender representation.

The report reveals disparities in representation across departments, with BME academics making up just 12% of humanities staff, yet constituting 24% of those in the medical sciences. Additionally, the representation of women is inconsistent across divisions. For instance, women make up just 18% of associate professor applicants in the Mathematical, Physical and Life Sciences Division (MPLS), whereas they constitute 39% in the Humanities Division. 

On the need to achieve better representation at top levels, Mitra explained: “One of the biggest challenges is a narrow diversity pipeline – insufficient representation in the talent pool and on the early and mid-career pathways that feed into the top level roles at Oxford”. The act of “hiring in your own image,” even if unconsciously, perpetuates the lack of representation on the career ladder, according to Mitra.

Mitra and her co-author Sue Dopson’s research expressed a need for better accommodation of individual needs in the workplace, specifically in relation to adjustments, support services and signposting – this is an area in need of “further attention”, she explained.

Age is another characteristic where representation gaps persist. Just 3% of all staff are aged 65 and over, with 1% of all women belonging to this age group, and 2% of men. The 65+ age group made up 0.3% of academic and research staff applications, with an offer rate of just 6%. Under 30s, by contrast, had an offer rate of 21% – over three times higher.

Oxford has previously been scrutinised for its Employer Justified Retirement Age Policy (EJRA), which had set a mandatory retirement age for academic staff. A tribunal in March 2023 ruled against the University, finding that the dismissal of four professors was unfair and showed evidence of age discrimination. The policy was later revised, though at the time, one of the four professors told Cherwell that the lengthy process had made his research prior to the ordeal difficult to restart.

The report comes amid debates over the importance of EDI initiatives in the US, where Trump has scrapped existing policies, threatening funding cuts to universities enforcing them. Drawing on the situation across the pond, the SU told Cherwell: “Now more than ever, we want to see EDI remain a clear priority at Oxford, especially at a time when such commitments are being rolled back at our American counterparts.”

On the SU’s role in advancing equality, diversity and inclusion, they added: “We will continue to champion student voice in EDI, with our VP for UG Education and Access, Eleanor Miller, being featured on the panel of the next University EDI roundtable. We also look forward to introducing dedicated Community and Equity Officers to support this important representative work in Trinity Term, as well as a Welfare, Equity & Inclusion Officer being reintroduced in July 2025.”

Helping the homeless: Volunteering or voyeurism?

In the depths of the spring vacation, with Finals and the looming emptiness of What Comes After staring at me from the near future, I decided to do some volunteering. The brilliant Turl Street Homeless Action had been a place of emotional refuge for me, so I sought a way to get involved in a similar charity helping the homeless in Milan, my hometown. 

I get there at 8.30pm and am immediately recruited to load water bottle cases off a van. ‘There’ is a glamorous covered shopping avenue one street away from Piazza Duomo, Milan’s one architectural wonder and tourist hotspot. Shops closed, the street has been turned into a makeshift food kitchen, with stations where water, snacks, and warm clothes are being handed out to a gaggle of regulars. 

The group, who have been meeting once a week for years, is a well-oiled machine. Within minutes we’re packing up, moving supplies to shopping trailers and Ikea bags to bring to those who can’t – or won’t – move from their makeshift shelters scattered around the streets of Italy’s fashion and luxury capital. A gaggle of Boy Scouts, formerly middle-aged women (the sciure, often stay-at-home wives or newly retired professionals, who keep Italy’s non-profit sector running), and retired professional football players, we move between the covered walkways that by day serve as the open-air runways of aspiring models and gallery walls of fashion connoisseurs. 

On our way to a bakery, which has kindly donated its leftover pastries to us to supplement the hot drinks and sandwiches, we pass one of the city’s oldest, poshest restaurants. In the glass-enclosed patio, a couple in black tie are picking at a thimble-sized portion of what looks like truffle pasta. I wonder if I should offer the woman, at least 20 years her dining partner’s junior, one of our sandwiches instead. Past the restaurant and the bakery, a village has sprung up. 

The picture is striking. Milan’s portici, long a symbol of unattainable luxury, of slender bodies and fine fabrics inaccessible to the masses, has been reclaimed and transformed into a scattering of tents, cardboard shacks, and shopping carts holding all the earthly possessions of their owners. As we move between these elaborate makeshift homes and chat to their inhabitants, I recognise a few from the food kitchen I sometimes work at during the day. There’s the handsome, freakishly tall, shamelessly flirty young man, probably a victim of Milan’s ruthless modeling industry (which relies on undocumented immigrants and sub-human wages); the impeccably dressed elderly couple; the group of men charging their phones outside a high-end perfume store. One of them is on a video call with a woman and a small army of young children, speaking in a foreign language. 

I want to ask about their stories, and I want to write about them – and photograph them. The brutal contrast – of high fashion and extreme poverty, of precariously built structures in front of boutiques charging a month’s rent for a belt, of mannequins wearing ‘distressed’ fabric staring impassively at tents heavy with wear – would make for a brilliant photo essay. How such an enormous number of people – over 2,600 according to the latest census, nearly 1 in 500 people in Milan – slipped through the social safety net in one of Europe’s wealthiest cities is something that should be investigated. Asking the people themselves seems like the fairest way to do that, and to refute the Italian right-wing’s narrative that the vast majority of the homeless problem is caused by illegal immigrants newly arrived from Africa. Most of the people we meet speak Italian flawlessly, and many of them have gone to school in Milan; one used to be a primary school teacher in the suburbs nearby. 

Some people would speak to me, I’m sure. More would if I became a regular at these Monday-evening volunteering outings; some might even let me take their picture in front of their makeshift shelters. But I can’t help but feel that by taking my camera with me – even by asking for an interview – I’m stepping out of the shoes of a community member trying to help and walking into a territory that is much more predatory. Ultimately, I’m a student trying to go into journalism: I need a portfolio, and an investigation into Milan’s homeless population would be a hit with papers while ticking some nifty virtue-signaling boxes in the process.

Volunteering has never seemed to me to be a transactional relationship: helping others is a fundamental part of belonging to a community and living with the understanding that, if I were ever in trouble, others would do the same for me. Doing the same as a journalist feels like fundamentally changing this relationship, placing myself as an outsider profiting off others’ misfortune.

Many of the people I would be photographing are young; photos of them at their lowest moment could haunt them online long after they’ve started a different life. Older people would have decades of life immortalized in a single, unrepresentative snapshot of abject misery, which may be their only online footprint. There seems to be something inherently exploitative or opportunistic in using others’ three-dimensional, complex lives and placing them in a 3:2 aspect ratio and a couple of sentences on why their plight supports my argument on Milan’s homeless problem. In a city built on capitalizing off photos of skeletal bodies and cheap labor, this feels even more pointed.

The National Press Photographers Association’s Code of Ethics helpfully advises journalists to “intrude on private moments of grief only when the public has an overriding and justifiable need to see.” Does a life spent at the fringes of society count as a “private moment of grief, if it is in the nature of homelessness for lives to play out entirely in the public, not private, sphere? Is even just asking for an interview ethical? Is writing this story itself, a meditation on the morality of (student) photojournalism just as predatory as it sounds, an effort to build the aforementioned portfolio?

Turning the corner to finish our round, we pass the restaurant, where the same couple is still staring morosely at the same plate of tagliatelle. A few metres away, a man is lying face down on a single layer of cardboard, his nose squashed against Milan’s cold marble. He is sheltering from the drizzle in the covered walkway of a high-end furniture store, where the cheapest chaise longue is on sale at €1699.99. As we move to offer him a bottle of water, all I can think is, this would make a great cover page.

Fences surrounding Radcliffe Camera removed

0

Fencing on the lawns of the Radcliffe Camera has been removed nearly nine months after it was initially put in place. The lawn areas outside the library had previously been blocked off with metal barriers following an encampment by Oxford Action for Palestine (OA4P) last year.

The encampment, which lasted from mid May through to early July, saw protestors set up tents on the grass outside the Rad Cam. This followed a first encampment in front of the Pitt Rivers Museum, which itself was dismantled by contractors using tractors and other vehicles in June 2024.

It is currently unclear precisely when the fencing around the Radcliffe Camera was removed.

OA4P last term established an occupation of the Rad Cam, dubbing it the “Khalida Jarrar Library” for the duration of their sit-in. Protestors positioned themselves on ledges outside windows, with police eventually arresting those involved after abseiling down the side of the library with specialist climbing equipment.

Oxford University had previously threatened to pursue a court order against the protestors if they did not disband their encampment. At the time, the University told Cherwell that they were “assessing the state of the lawn and what further action is required to clear and restore the site”.

Oxford University and OA4P were both approached for comment.

Varsity Summer Trip: What do we know?

0

The inaugural Varsity Summer Trip, a five-day trip for Oxford University and Cambridge University students to Malta in early July 2025, will be launching its first ticket release on Sunday, with ticket prices starting at £760. With recent speculation about its authenticity online, including from the Instagram account ‘Overheard at Oxford’, what do we really know about the initiative?

Co-founder Israr Khan, a DPhil Law student at Oxford and President of the Oxford Union in Hilary 2025, told Cherwell that the trip aims to fill the gap in “organised events catering specifically to Oxbridge students during the long summer break”. The event, which is unaffiliated with the more established winter Varsity Trip, promises “festival-style parties, themed summer balls, and iconic beach nights in historical locations”.

Concerns were raised over Varsity Summer Trip not being a registered company. As of 2nd April, it is a private limited company, incorporated some time after the Instagram account promoting it was established. An initial ‘coming soon’ post was published on 29th November 2024 in addition to a further ‘get ready’ post, including ticket information, on the 27th March. 

The company’s directors are Oxford alumni Adnan Rafiq and Ayyaz Mallick. Khan told Cherwell that the company also has five permanent employees, including a “Student Engagement Officer” and a “Finance and Compliance Officer”, though he declined to provide specific names, citing data protection and privacy laws. 

Cherwell can reveal that the Varsity Summer Trip Instagram page was repurposed from the Instagram page for the “#REVIVE” slate for Oxford Union elections during Khan’s unsuccessful campaign to be President in Hilary Term 2024. Prior to this, the same account was also used for Theo Sergiou’s campaign to be Sabbatical Officer of the Student Union in Hilary Term 2022. In addition, the account was briefly employed for the “Jan Royall for Oxford Chancellor” campaign in Michaelmas Term 2024.

Regarding the company’s funding sources, Khan said that it is “funded through a combination of startup loans, external funding, and personal investments from the founders”. When asked about concerns surrounding the event’s budget and capacity, he said that the trip “is designed for 300 participants” and in the event that this target is not met, the trip has a “comprehensive contingency plan in place, including a reserve fund to ensure financial security and an insurance policy to cover unforeseen circumstances”. 

In response to concerns about insurance, Khan told Cherwell they have “applied for membership with both ABTA and Trusted Travel”, though they do not yet have such cover. Khan also provided Cherwell with Employers’ Liability and Public Liability Insurance documents. 

Director Adnan Rafiq told Cherwell, in response to claims that they had sold tickets for the trip as early as December, that while an earlier timeframe for ticket sales was explored, “[n]o ticket sales were initiated, promoted, or posted on any of our official channels, and there has been no prior trip under this banner. More importantly, in December our website was live but in the testing phase.”

Rafiq added that criticism of the trip was related to “unfortunate political narratives (…) particularly in relation to past Oxford Union dynamics” and that “If [they] had launched this initiative without having people like Israr and Moosa as part of the initiative, there wouldn’t have been any reaction from those individuals.” 

Cherwell contacted two of the Oxford college representatives listed on the website, but both claimed to have little knowledge of the plans. They declined to comment.

Be more grateful

0

This term has been by far the hardest of my degree. Having chosen a slightly nightmarish paper combination, I have been forced to spend far more time in the library than ever before and to significantly cut down my extra-curricular activities. Combined with gloomy winter weather, and a seemingly ever-worsening disability, it has hardly been the most joyous seven weeks. 

But within that misery, there are always moments of joy and opportunities to be grateful. The point I wish to make here is simple: that regardless of how bad life gets, there is always something to be grateful for or to take solace in. This is especially pertinent in the Oxford context. When we arrive for our first open day, or offer holder day, or even our first day of our first Michaelmas, almost all of us are struck with something of a sense of awe. 

But as that first day gets further away, that sense of awe quickly fades. Bound up in endless essays, dinners and stressful tutorials, we start to forget just how lucky we are to be at this University at all – and to be afforded the opportunities that we have. We live in an ever-competitive world. There is always another rung to climb, another Committee position to apply for, another mark to be gained in an exam. Looking at the range of things I’ve achieved over the first half of my degree, I am confident that fresher me would have been extremely pleased – but second year me still wants to achieve more and more. 

If you choose to, you can always be looking to the future –  endlessly seeking some endpoint that you’re sure will satisfy you. But almost certainly once you get there, you’ll choose a new endpoint. Or, you can choose to be present and grateful – to acknowledge just how awesome a privilege it is to be at this University at this present moment. You can acknowledge how special it is to have access to the best academics, the best libraries, and the best classmates.

I would argue also that you have a responsibility to acknowledge the thousands of people who would want to be exactly where you are right now. In 2023, Oxford gave offers to 16% of those who applied for undergraduate courses, which means that every year thousands of students across the country are told that they can’t have what you have right now. This was brought home to me when I was discussing with my girlfriend whether we should go to watch the Union debate that night, and I realised that there were likely thousands of young people across the globe who would give so much to have the opportunity to sit in that chamber once – a privilege I enjoy on a weekly basis.

Of course, sometimes you must complain –  and rightfully so. The world is only made better when we challenge the status quo. But I would also challenge you to be a little more grateful. Next time you struggle with a paper, think about how incredible it is that you even get to study that paper. Next time you get rejected from a Committee, think about what a privilege it is to be eligible to be a member of that society in the first place. 

Life is hard, I don’t query this in the slightest. Nor do I query that for many of you reading this, it will seem hard to be grateful for the life that you currently lead, and I acknowledge that the challenges you have faced likely far outstrip mine. Put simply, however, to live in the modern western world means you are one of the luckiest humans ever to be alive; and to be at this University makes you even luckier. 

University set to adopt non-binary inclusive Latin in ceremonies

0

Oxford University is set to adopt gender-inclusive Latin in its official ceremonies. The move has been described as “necessary” to better represent those who identify as non-binary.

Members of the Congregation, the governing body of the University, will vote on the proposed changes in April. The modified Latin will apply to degree ceremonies, as well as the admission of University officers.

The gender-inclusive Latin will replace addresses such as “domini” and “magistri” with “vos”, the neuter plural pronoun for “you”. The gendered term “qui” will also be replaced by the neuter term “cum”. 

The Latin speeches date back 800 years, when the University was formally established in the 13th century and Latin was the language of learning across Europe. Though Latin has faded out of use, university conferrals and ceremonies still use the language as a traditional formality, in combination with spoken English.

Additionally, English used in the admission of University officers, such as the Chancellor and Vice-Chancellor, will also undergo changes, with all gendered language set to be eliminated.

A University spokesperson told Cherwell: “The proposed changes before Congregation create a single text for each ceremony, covering all options students now have for registering genders in line with legal reporting requirements for higher education.”

The proposed changes come amid accusations that the University recently undermined inclusivity during LGBTQ+ History Month. In a statement made in response to the invitation of various controversial speakers last month, Oxford University LGBTQ+ Society accused the University of “repeatedly elevating anti-trans campaigners without meaningful opposition” and requested that the University “enforce its [equality] policy”.

The proposed changes will come into place in October this year, subject to a vote by Congregation next month.

Oxford City Council passes Boycott Divestment and Sanctions motion

0

Oxford City Council passed a motion on 24th March in support of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel. The motion, which cited International Court of Justice (ICJ) rulings, passed with a unanimous vote by councillors across multiple political parties.

The motion called for “strengthening” the Council’s “ethical procurement and investment policies” to “reaffirm” its “commitment to human rights and international law”, as well as diverting funds from companies prolonging the use of fossil fuels.

Councillor Barbara Coyne, who proposed the motion said: “It is vital, in this moment, that Oxford City Council act to uphold international law and end local complicity in colonial genocide”. 

On the evening of the vote, dozens of protestors gathered outside the Town Hall on St Aldate’s to hold a silent vigil in support of the motion, holding signs reading “Divest now” and “Not in our name”.

The BDS movement, founded in 2005, works to “end international support for Israel’s oppression of Palestinians” through non-violently pressuring Israel to comply with its obligations under international law.

The motion cites ICJ rulings which underline UN member states’ obligation to actively avoid complicity in Israel’s illegal occupation of Palestine.The motion further emphasises that international legal norms that apply to states extend to local authorities. 

Councillor Hosnieh Djafari-Marbini, the seconder of the motion, said: “We have put forward this motion as we hear all those Oxford residents who have demonstrated, expressed disgust at the Israeli war crimes and boycotted Israeli goods.”

The decision comes after Oxford City Council’s unanimous vote for an immediate and permanent ceasefire in Gaza in November 2023, and the Council’s decision last year to oppose the Anti-Boycott Bill

The timeline for concrete changes by the council remains uncertain, as do any potential bureaucratic obstacles. However, Councillor Coyne remains optimistic, expressing hope that the motion “will be thoroughly implemented, and that its passage may pave the way for other councils to take decisive action.”