Thursday 26th June 2025
Blog Page 1346

Union President writes open letter to speakers

0

Union President Ben Sullivan has sent an open letter to this term’s speakers encouraging them to appear at their agreed events. 

In the letter addressed to General Petreaus and Paloma Faith amongst others, Sullivan said, “The Union was founded on the principles of free speech and debate. This core belief in the opportunity for everyone to put forward their point of view still represents the ultimate purpose of the institution. This overarching principle remains more important than any individual speaker, any debate, and any President.” 

Sullivan pointed out, “Acting upon legal advice, I am not yet able to give my side of the story. As such I currently do not even have the ability to defend myself from these allegations which I deny”

He continued, “Under British law, a person is innocent until proven guilty. This principle governs British society and for the President of the Union to subvert it would be to act against everything the institution stands for. If there is one place where an allegation must be treated as just an allegation, then it is in this Society.”

In reference to this Thursday’s no-confidence motion, which was proposed by over 30 Union members and will be debated in front of the House, Sullivan said, “I feel the calls for my resignation are premature”. However, he did state, “Should the situation change I will of course review my position” 

The letter comes after an open letter from OUSU Vice President for Women Sarah Pine and Helena Dollimore, which called on this term’s speakers to consider withdraw from planned Union events. Human rights activist and nobel Prize-winner Tawakkol Karman subsequently announced on Channel 4 that she was pulling out of the Union’s term card.

In turn, A.C. Grayling wrote an open letter to Pine defending his decision to speak on 22nd May, stating “I simply cannot, in all conscience, allow myself to act only on the basis of allegations and suspicions, or of conviction by the kangaroo court of opinion, or trial by the press.” 

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%9802%%[/mm-hide-text] 

OUSU Returning Officer resigns over NUS controversy

0

The Returning Officer of OUSU has resigned after “serious irregularities” were revealed to have taken place in the recent NUS referendum. 

Alexander Walker, a second year chemist at Wadham, posted his resignation on the board at the union last night.

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%9801%%[/mm-hide-text]

In the letter he states, “I have been the returning officer of OUSU since January and I believe that I have contributed by working with the sabbatical officers and by organising the RAG ballot and other council elections.

“However, in light of the recent events concerning the NUS referendum, I have come to the decision that my position is no longer tenable. The grave situation with the NUS referendum happened under my watch. Although we do not currently understand how this happened, I do not believe that I should continue in this position as with my academic pressures as a second year chemist, I am unable to fulfil my duties. 

He continues, “I understand that many people have had a great deal invested in this referndum and I feel for them in this turbulent time. I wish the Junior Tribunal the best of luck in finding out how this happened and I am happy to continue to contribute to the investigation.” 

The investigation follows a formal complaint put forward by Jack Matthews, leader of the ‘Believe in Oxford’ campaign following irregularities with the voting process. The official result of the referendum was announced at the King Arms pub at 7.30 on Wednesday with a 1780 to 1652 vote to disaffiliate from the NUS for the academic year 2014-2015 announced. However, there were a large number of ‘No’ votes which appeared to have been cast at the same time, from the same location. Cherwell understands that a large number of Unique Voter Codes (UVCs) were used in the last hour of the election process in order to give the ‘No’ vote a wide margin of victory. This has raised major concerns with the validity of the referendum and a Junior Tribunal is meeting today to investigate the issue.

OUSU President and leader of the YES campaign, Tom Rutland, told Cherwell, “A Junior Tribunal is meeting today to consider the complaint issued regarding the voting irregularities in the referendum.”

Country Diary: Shotover

0

We cross South Park when it is already getting dark. It’s been raining for the past two days, but tonight the view is clear and stars are beginning to pockmark the sky, presided by a lamp of a moon.

The grass is still wet, soggy, puddled; if you stand quietly enough, you can hear the water trickling downhill in a series of miniature channels over which our boots slip and sludge clumsily.

At the top of the park we sit beneath a Sycamore overlooking the city. Only a few spires remain illuminated now, shedding light on weathered rock, alone; exposed.

Soon we’re off again, walking along dimly illuminated streets, passing the dilapidated Thistle and Crown. We cross the ring-road and soon the real climb begins. The road loses its pavement and the banks become steeper and lined with tall trees. Eventually the walker is exposed to a long, open ridge.

Few students make the trek out to Shotover, and those who do make it all the way out of town usually do so by means other than their own feet. And
yet, there’s something more fulfilling about leaving one’s doorstep, crossing the blurred boundary out of town and into a silent environment, before
returning by one’s own feet.

Shotover is one of Oxford’s truly liminal spaces – open, forested, liberating,
naked – yet still clearly undetached from the biref glimpses of Botley’s gridded housing. Shotover is part of a private estate, and the subject of a peculiar Daily Mail article from 2010 entitled, “Queen’s friend calls in police after his
estate is overrun with people having outdoor sex”.

On a warm sunny day, the sloping field to the South is fi lled with young children playing ball, and families barbecuing or sitting on rugs. On one such unique day, when sun, breeze and even weekend accomplished a stunning afternoon, I was offered chicken wings and a drink by a friendly Albanian couple before I set off to discover the endless minute valleys, grassy clearings and woods.

These small woods are surprising in their variety; one moment one is surrounded by tall oaks, the next by ash, birch, hazel or willow. All these trees, and the rich wildlife which surrounds them, is meticulously noted, recorded and published in leaflets by Shotover Wildlife, a small organisation run by local volunteers.

But right now it’s not sunny: it’s nearing midnight, and we’re not so concerned with the names of the trees or the wealth of the wildlife around us. Sitting in a comfortable oak, we look down into the valley to Botley, the lights a sea of gloworms.

Places are not the same by night. They are transformed. Shapes and forms take on different sizes, colours and shades. Perspective becomes
blurred, sounds sharper. When I first began going on nightwalks, making short outings to Addison’s walk, I was often scared, on edge, even in the safe surroundings of college walls. But soon I came to endorse the dark; I enjoyed noting the differences, appreciating my newly darkened, muted surroundings as a different place entirely.

I soon became fascinated by the shape of branches against the dimmed sky; sinewy black ink rivulets upon a pastel shade.

We walk down from Shotover and cross the bypass; the lights on the street glare and confuse our eyes, and I wish I had slept there.

Country Diary: The Water Meadow

0

The water meadow goes through an incredible transformation at this time of the year. Having spent months submerged by the rising waters, like a smaller version, isolated and walled, of Port Meadow, the grass blooms with purple Snakeshead fritillaries around the beginning of April. Such a display of purple bloom is not common – there are few places where the purple petals can be seen growing in such numbers, despite being recorded in this particular spot since 1785. 

These delicate, spotty, dangling violet cups, however, do not last long, and briefly the colour in the meadow recedes to a dull green for a few weeks.
Nevertheless, the yellow sparkle of wild buttercups slowly starts to adorn the field. The flowers rise at first tentatively out of the tall grass, forming isolated pockets of bright colour, before fully asserting themselves as a powdery sea of yellow.

In typical Oxford fashion, intruders are most unwelcome in this sacred patch of yellow and green, an untouched holy land into which very few are nevertheless not tempted to trample once or twice during their degrees.
“Under no circumstances should any students enter the Deer park. We will treat this extremely seriously.”

Permeated for half the year by the threatening bark of male deer, the field is suitably empty for the more adventurous undergraduates to trample into by the time it gives over to a yellow jungle.

After dark, the endeavour feels most like an adventure. On a warm night, “the warmest night of the decade”, we jump over the metal bars into the thick grass and walk across the field tentatively, listening to the scratching of a delicate claw on rough bark, or the flow of the Isis/Cherwell/Thames, ever reminiscent of the meadow’s purpose – to be covered by a shallow veil of water.

Walking back home on a summer’s night, one often bumps in to a group of tramps lighting a fire across the river – metres away – in a bizarre, tangible reminder of the Bubble.

But perhaps on a glazed summer’s day the magical reality of this most exceptional spot can be felt at its best. Pleasantly woozy, dazed by the brilliant Trinity sun, a frolic, a skip and a jump through this thickly threaded yellow tapestry is an experience like no other.

It’s a moment of blind delight, of timelessness in the face of the crunching passage of time; soon, the deer will be back, munching away at the tough grass; soon the waters will be back again, reflecting the tower in its shallow depths at night; soon the fritillaries will be emerging, to begin the cycle again, and the final stretch of academic entitlement will be laid bare.

But not now. At this specific fragment of time, delicate and fleeting as a sheet of glass, the yellow powder, flying from the buttercups as we run and dance and chase, has gathered on my trousers, giving them a golden wash. I brush off the fairy powder as we climb out into the open again, back into the (semi) real world.

Country Diary: Fiddler’s Island

0

Port Meadow looks different before a swim. It is colder and wilder, perhaps because your whole consciousness is focussed on the river. The river is what frames the meadow – it is the point at which the land stops being Our Oxford and starts being “the wilderness” leading on to Binsey and the woods beyond. If you look at a map, you can see the way that the Cherwell encloses the city, creating pockets of land with names and personalities – meadows, allotments, and parks.

Just south of Port Meadow is an area of land called Fiddler’s Island, where the Medley Bridge leads to a fork in the river which separates the Thames from Castle Mill Stream and the Oxford Canal. Here you find an area of water which was authorised for public bathing in 1852. There are other places to swim in the city – Parson’s Pleasure, Tumbling Bay. Worcester Lake has been done by many, as has Uni Parks and the divided stream of the Cherwell under Magdalen Bridge. But there is something about Port Meadow, its simultaneous closeness and removed-ness from the city, which makes it a good place to start for prospective wild swimmers.

At college, we bundle up like children going to the seaside – towels, jumpers, flip-flops. But it’s only April, and it’s a grey day, and there’s an air of trepidation as well as excitement in the walk through Jericho and over the railway bridge. We have done this in January, February and March, in three jumpers and a coat, when the river was flooded and wild and even the ducks sat on the canal boats fearing the strength of the current. The water was a whirlpool – too dangerous to jump in, we lowered ourselves down, holding onto the bridge to avoid being swept downstream. This time though, we brace ourselves and jump, eyes closed and breath held.

There’s a wonderful feeling of freedom that comes from being in the water, especially here where it is deep enough to kick your legs out without touching river-bed. It’s not like swimming in the sea, where you feel like the waves are washing you clean. The water of the Thames is brown and murky, and we emerge with mud and scratches on our bodies from climbing out over the bank, skin raw and pink and hastily covered in towels and clothing. This is not a baptism in the sense of feeling cleansed and refreshed by the water – in fact you feel like you need a long bath and bed as soon as possible.

But it is a rite. This is how you become part of the Meadow – reclaim it as something human. Not in the way that destroys trees, and erects housing complexes and roads, but in the way that makes humans an intrinsic part of the landscape, and it a part of us. Swimming in summer, when the Meadow is buzzing with people, this feeling is more acute. People line up to watch the crazy students playing on the rope swing on Fiddler’s Island.
The river is a part of the personality of Oxford, where rowing and punting and crossing the Magdalen bridge are part of the daily fabric of life. These things are also what separate us from real life. This is what you feel when swimming – that nowhere else could being in the river mean quite so much.

Country Diary: Wytham Woods

0

Wytham Woods – pronounced “white-am” – lie at the northwestern edge of Port Meadow, on a hill which lies vigilant beyond the endless field.

The hand-drawn map supplied to passholders in itself fuels the natural imagination: Rough Common, Healing’s Copse, The Singing Way, My Lady’s Seat, Five Sisters, and Marley Wood are all pencilled in among the criss-crossing lines denoting woods, paths and fields.

These names all suggest familiarity and association; they hold in their very names decades of human exploration and attachment.

Wytham Woods, a Site of Special Scientific Interest, are used by the University for biological research, and are meant to be one of the most studied areas of woodland in the world.

It’s my birthday. We walk up to Wytham on a muted March evening, which wind and grey clouds threaten to damped. We pass Godstow Nunnery and make the slow climb to the wooden gates leading officially into the woods.
It’s unusual being in a wood which is also a scientific laboratory. The area covered by the protected forest is only a few square miles – enough for a refreshing stroll but not quite sufficient to challenge muscles or breath.

All around, birdhuts, used to monitor the great tit population, hang from old oaks, whilst in the open fields, nets are drawn over small patches of grass to measure their growth. Metal scaffolding stands skeleton-like among the upper branches of old trees.

There’s something comforting about being surrounded by trees. The perspective of looking through rows and rows of vertical boughs, sometimes, in the distance, matching up in a straight line, or otherwise opening up, allowing the eye to reach further, is cleansing.

In such a forest there is of course much more than visual pleasure; there’s the sound of wind bending and creaking age-old timber, or the whiff of damp leaves, the smell of air, damp, imbued with life.

The forest, as we walk along the Singing Way to the Great Wood, is quiet. All around us there is flourishing life, and yet a form of life which exists on a completely different timescale to the one we know. No wonder that forests have served as a source of contemplation and inspiration for so many centuries.

As we enter the Great Wood, the large trunks of oak and ash make way for younger sprouts of hazel. The path winds down into a small valley and a light rattling sound fills our ears. The sound rises and falls like an eerie natural composition. At first wonderfully inexplicable, we soon discover that the sound comes from thousands of small metal circles nailed on to individual trees to keep track of their growth and position. A deer crosses the increasingly winding path, takes a brief, striking look back, before springing away.

It’s getting dark now, and wearied limbs are calling for a much-needed rest. Soon boots hit tarmac again, and eventually we’re crossing Port Meadow’s deep mud, just as the rain, previously threatening and now lashing, drenches us to the bone.

Review: Vico

0

Watching a play in the dark, claustrophobic setting of the BT is never a light-hearted experience. Especially when said play deals with the psychopathic insanity of one protagonist and the gradual descent into insanity of the other. But then who said theatre had to be light-hearted?

Vico, written and directed by first-year undergraduate, Douglas Taylor, is the story of a highly intelligent sociopath who, through a variety of games and manipulations tries to drive her psychotherapist, Finn, mad.

At the very start of the play the over-confident, Vico strides in and makes the revelation that she killed her mother, by stabbing her in the face. Over the course of the next few therapy sessions, she skips, eats a banana, brings in dead birds, plays head and tales and relentlessly provokes and attacks her undeserving therapist, playing on her every insecurity: ‘You’re barren! It died….your child.’  

The play is well-paced to show how Finn slowly crumbles under the pressure from Vico. At one pivotal moment the two swap seats to show the reversal of roles and at the end of the play Finn finally submits to Vico’s demand that she should refer to her by her first name and not as ‘Miss Moretti’. Vico’s refrain that ‘nothing is original’ because of the ‘cycle of life’, the constant repetition of which itself emphasizes her point, turns out to be tragically accurate. Why both of the main female characters have male names, however, remains unexplained to the very end. 

Sarah Abdoo delivers an energetic and accomplished performance as Vico, but the star of the play is Kimberley Sadovich, who expertly embodies the uptight therapist with a gradually deteriorating grasp on reality. The hapless work experience boy (Jonas Hoersch), though he provides a few cheap chuckles when he repeatedly interrupts the emotionally fraught therapy sessions to ask for staples, is somewhat of a cliché.The brief but touching scenes between Finn and her husband (James Baird) provide some welcome punctuation in the tense environment of the play. 

The set is perfect. The black leather chairs are exactly the type one would expect to find in a swanky Harley St. Clinic. The hanging picture frames and mirrors create a slightly otherworldly feel, as does the eerie electronic sound backing, which is an interesting mix of extra-terrestrial tones and Southern American jingles.

This play is a mesmerising piece of theatre, by turn horribly tragic and darkly comic. For all its virtues, I’m glad it is no longer than an hour, because after a while the erratic behaviour of the central characters and ambiguous allusions of the script made me feel like I myself was starting to go a bit potty.  

Country Diary: Port Meadow

0

In his recent book of poetry inspired by Port Meadow, David Atwooll allows that “It’s a peopled place / of course: painted landscapes often need, somewhere, a red smudge”.

One would struggle to describe Port Meadow as a “wild” place. Flanked by a busy railway track and surrounded on all sides by the physical presence of city life, Port Meadow is hardly a remote natural spot; it acts rather as an oasis close to Oxford’s centre. But perhaps it’s this human element that adds to its sense of place.

Most students who feel the pull of natural places have soon exhausted the charm and tidiness of their college gardens or Christ Church meadows; often their first destination in search of a slightly more rugged, remote place is this seemingly endless expanse of grass and mud.

Port Meadow is steeped in myth; it’s the unploughed landscape, the land earned from resisting the Danes, a sacred spot where the Freemen graze their cattle.

It is, nevertheless, a changing landscape, an idea which is captured in Atwooll’s poetry, collected in his pamphlet Ground Work. Illustrated by Andrew Walton, the collection explores the various phases of Port Meadow, from “veiled in mist and frost” to an “archipelago of pools” as the flood which mantles the flat land for months on end begins to recede.

Ash, willow and Gerard Manley Hopkins’ Binsey Poplars (“All felled, felled, are all felled”) stand scatterred along along the grassy edges.

To the West, the Isis soaks its banks on the meadow, tempting an intrepid swimmer to be carried gently down the water by a strong current as a sunny day comes to its lengthy close. 

Just across the thick grass, to the East, lies Burgess Field, a small forest which has regenerated on a reclaimed landfill site. The young forest stands immutable as a poignant reminder of the visitor’s transcience.

The meadow is alive. Birds rise in throngs or poke about alone — herons picking the puddled grass for small fish, dunlin with their long arched beaks, as well as geese, gulls, godwits, warblers and the occasional glide of a peregrine or a buzzard.

Horses and cattle share the flat, undulating land at alternating times of the year, allowed only when the creeping waters of the flood don’t leave them stranded.

Port meadow: a meadow turned habour by the winter floods; a field made jolly on sunny afternoons by sweet wine. At night, across the water, Wolvercote flickers in the distance like a seaside town.

And yet it remains, in Atwooll’s words, a “peopled place”. For this landscape is not all sunny walks and natural beauty. Open spaces like this have always attracted questionable activities after nightfall. Such sites are as often places of enjoyment and pleasure as they are sites of reflection, sorrow, despair.

Only the other day, a pink princess outfit, with white frills on the shoulders, glinting glitter, hung from a hawthorn on the edge of the railway track. As a train rushed past, the wind lifted the dress and it blew listelessly, light, to and fro on the tree’s side. The remnants of a moment, opaque, unfinished, vanished.

European election results for Oxford announced

0

Oxford has bucked the South East trend in the European Parliament elections, with Labour having come first in Oxford’s results, securing 13,015 votes (33%), followed by the Green Party, with 8337 votes (21.24%).

However, in the South East (the European Parliament constituency to which Oxfordshire belongs), UKIP have won four of the ten available seats, with the Conservative Party in second place with three. Labour, the Liberal Democrats and the Green Party each took one seat. UKIP leader Nigel Farage is among the candidates elected to the European Parliament for the South East.

Across the South East, UKIP secured 32.14% of the vote, seeing their share increase 13.29% from 2009; a win of two additional seats. In second place, the Conservatives won 30.95% of the vote; a decrease of 3.84%, and the loss of one seat. In third, Labour won 14.66%, an increase of 6.41%, but remained with one seat.

Despite their overall success in the South East, UKIP came fifth in the Oxford poll, with 4979 votes (12.63%). In Oxford, the Conservative Party came in at third place, having secured 5997 votes (15.21%), closely followed by the Liberal Democrats, with 5332 votes (13.52%).

Balliol student and Socialist Party candidate Claudia Hogg-Blake, the only Oxford student to run in the European elections, told Cherwell that she took some consolation in the fact that UKIP were knocked into fifth place in Oxford. Speaking on the success of UKIP on a national scale, Hogg-Blake commented, “I would rather people had voted for a non-racist party”.

Remarking on the performance of the Socialist Party in the elections, she added, “It’s good that we managed to increase our vote, but it’s not as good as we would have liked. That said, we didn’t expect to do that well”. In Oxford, the Socialist Party won 221 votes, or 0.56% of the vote.

Turnout in the Oxford area was 38.22%, up from 35.5% in the 2009 European elections, and greater than the 36.46% turnout for the South East. Europe-wide, turnout has marginally increased for the first time since elections to the European Parliament began in 1979, at 43.11%, up from 43% in 2009.

Speaking after the results were announced for the South East, Nigel Farage claimed that UKIP “have delivered just about the most extraordinary result that has been seen in British politics for 100 years.”

Farage continued, “In a way it is surprising it didn’t happen before, because we have had three parties in British politics that have lead us into a common market that has developed into a political union, who’ve twisted and turned with a variety of promises to give us a referendum that they’ve never actually kept. I think the penny’s really dropped, that as members of this union, we can’t run our own country, and crucially we can’t control our own borders”.

Nationally, UKIP have increased their vote by nearly 11%, so far securing an additional ten seats, bringing their total to twenty-three. This matches the European trend, as across Europe, anti-immigration and euroskeptic parties seem to have made significant gains. Nevertheless, in Britain the far-right BNP have seen their vote decrease by over 5%, losing all their seats in the European Parliament.

In elections to the European Parliament, Oxford is part of the South East constituency, which comprises Berkshire, Buckinghamshire, Hampshire, Kent, Oxfordshire, Surrey and Sussex. The constituency, which is the largest in the UK, returns ten members to the European Parliament, representing a population of around eight million.