Thursday 9th April 2026
Blog Page 1384

Review: Laurence Clark: Moments of Instant Regret

0

We all have our inner demons. Or, in Laurence Clark’s case, just the one: a foul-mouthed cartoon monkey called Chip. Chip is projected onto the screen behind him during the show and springs to life to recreate moments when the angry, sweary or just downright obnoxious simian that lurks in us all takes over, advising Laurence (“like an evil Yoda”) to respond to ignorance and incompetence with aggression. Aggression such as, for example, heckling fellow comic Richard Herring with the age-old criticism ‘cunt!’, reducing a waiter to a sobbing wreck, biting a policeman… That sort of thing.

Why Chip? Not, as is pointed out, because he stands for the proverbial chip-on-the-shoulder, the nagging sense of inferiority that makes us all do stupid, self-assertive things from time to time. “He’s called Chip because I like chips,” Laurence says, by way of introduction. “His full name is Chip Lasagne Blowjob.”

But heaven knows Laurence has enough to be chippy about. He’s from Manchester. Married, possibly just for the purposes of our Liverpool venue and audience, to a scouser. Oh, and he has cerebral palsy which confines him to a wheelchair. The kind which prompts a flight-attendant, noting his slurred speech and erratic gestures, to reply “I think you’ve had enough already, sir,” when Laurence asks for his first beer of the journey.

As the act progresses, it becomes clear what Chip is really: he is the arch-nemesis of niceness. The scenarios discussed show the difficulties in knowing how to react in the face of faintly ignorant, patronising behaviour when the perpetrator is actually acting with the best of intentions. You know where you are with nastiness  – good, honest nastiness that doesn’t require a nuanced response of tolerance and tact. To demonstrate, Laurence asks us at the start to say so if we can’t understand what he’s on about and he’ll happily repeat himself. And when he deliberately descends into unintelligible mumbling, do any of us say a word? No – we sit in appalled silence, wondering what’s gone wrong, and are called to account for our kind dishonesty.

I’d be surprised if the entire audience caught every word, but it was less an unwillingness to risk embarrassment than a desire to not disturb the clever, coherent constructions of his comic sequences and to keep their non-stop delight rattling along. After all, aside from its sheer insightfulness, the show is a marvel of creative performance: tables are constantly and thought-provokingly turned on our perception of disability through videos, photos, animation, text and the spoken word. It’s this clever and artfully handled combination of media which Clark excels at, along with more traditional stand-up techniques – the ridiculously satisfying bit of ring-composition which returns us to Richard Herring makes me suppress a snort of laughter just thinking about it.

But don’t say: oh, he’s so brave. So inspirational. Don’t even say: this is a show which everyone should see to expand their empathy and appreciation of the capacities of the human spirit, no matter how true you think that may be. You’ll have missed the point of Moments of Instant Regret if you even remotely exaggerate Laurence’s brilliance on account of his cerebral palsy. Just take it for the dazzling and riotous performance of anger, wisdom and humour that it undoubtedly is.

By-election to be held for Carfax City Council seat

0

A by-election to replace a vacant seat on Oxford City Council in Carfax ward has been scheduled for Thursday 4 September 2014. The ward, of which approximately 70% of its residents are students, was previously represented by Labour city councillor Anne-Marie Canning, who announced her resignation from the seat last week citing personal reasons.

Each ward has two representatives on Oxford City Council, with half of the 48 seats in the City Council coming up for election every two years, meaning that councillors are elected on an alternate basis. Canning filled one of two council seats representing Carfax Ward on Oxford City Council, with the other being held by Green councillor Ruthi Brandt, who was elected in the May 2014 city elections.

Oxford City Council is currently Labour controlled, with the Labour group possessing 33 of the 48 seats. The other seats on the Council are held by the Liberal Democrats, who have eight seats, the Greens, who have six seats, and an independent councillor.

The by-election was triggered after a request for an election to fill the vacancy was submitted to Oxford City Council Returning Officer Jeremy Thomas by two local government electors from Carfax. Following the request an election to fill the vacant seat was required within 35 days, in accordance with the Local Government Act 1972.

The ward contains a large proportion of Oxford’s retail centre, as well as many Oxford colleges and Oxford University buildings. The 2011 Census found that Carfax had a total population of 6,361 people of which 4,236 were students living in communal establishments. Overall, the census found that 70% of the residents of Carfax ward were full time students.  

However, the Oxford University term does not begin until Sunday, 12 October, meaning that many students will not be in Oxford when the by-election takes place on 4 September. 

The by-election follows the resignation of Labour Councillor Anne-Marie Canning, which created a vacancy in the ward. Canning told the Oxford Mail that the reason for her resignation was that her job as a head of department at a London university was becoming increasingly demanding. Canning was first elected to Oxford City Council in 2012, taking the seat for Labour from the Liberal Democrats. In that election Canning won the seat by a margin of 53 votes, with 288 votes, while the Green Party’s Adam Ramsay came second with 235 votes.

Canning is the third Labour city councillor to announce her intention to stand down from the City Council in the past two months.

In the May 2014 Oxford City Council election, for the other City Council seat in Carfax ward, Ruthi Brandt of the Green Party replaced incumbent Liberal Democrat councillor Tony Brett. Brandt won the ward by only 35 votes, receiving a total of 483 votes, while Labour Party candidate and former council leader Alex Hollingsworth came in second place with 448 votes.

The Deputy Leader of Oxford City Council Ed Turner said, “It is sad that Anne-Marie has had to resign, as she’s done a fantastic job, especially in campaigning on cuts to homeless services.  It would be completely unacceptable to leave students without a second ward councillor, especially at the crucial start of term period, and delaying the by-election would serve no useful purpose as the electoral register would be massively out of date until March.  It would include last year’s finalists who no longer live in Oxford, but exclude first years.  I would encourage any students keen to participate to apply for a postal vote.”

One student commented, “Students don’t often get to have their voice heard and often suffer as a result, so at opportunities like this – when 70% of the ward is made up of students – it’s really important that our voice is heard so that our needs can be met.”

Applications for postal votes, for the by-election, must reach the Electoral Registration Officer at Oxford Town Hall by 5pm on Tuesday 19 August 2014.

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%10089%%[/mm-hide-text] 

© Crown Copyright and database right 2011. Ordinance Survey 100019348

St. Cross extension gets green light

0

St. Cross College has successfully appealed Oxford City Council’s decision to reject the College’s planning application for a new extension. Work on the West Quad – designed to add 50 new bedrooms, three seminar rooms and a lecture theatre – will begin in the near future. 

Sir Mark Jones, Master of St. Cross, revealed, “I am absolutely delighted to hear we now have planning permission for the West Quad.” He added, “We can look forward to completing our 2015 50th Anniversary Campaign for the West Quad, and starting the build. This is wonderful news for St Cross.”

The planning application had earlier been rejected by Oxford City Council amidst objections from local residents. Concerns were voiced over the possible effects building might have on the surrounding area. 

The Oxford Civic Society has also previously registered its discontent at the proposals. The Society exists to, amongst other things, preserve Oxford’s heritage.

It is also believed that some Oxford academics have made objections to the building proposals in the past.

Wybo Wiersma, a current member of the College, told Cherwell he believed the changes would improve college life, but “when the design was chosen there were 3 short-listed contestants, and any of the other two would have fitted in their surroundings much better”.

He added, “the design as such probably has it’s aesthetic merits, but not here, not in the historic surroundings of central Oxford. They could just as well have built a London sky-scraper inside Magdalen main quad.”

Others contributed in a similar vein. Chairman of Oxford’s Victorian Society Peter Howell stated when the plans were first made public that “We object to the proposal to erect a new building on Pusey Street. St Cross College shares the site with Pusey House, which is a building of the highest architectural merit.”

One student told Cherwell, “I can see people’s concerns, but I suppose you’re not really a real Oxford college until you’ve got an ugly modern part of college that you’re ashamed for everyone else to see.”

Review: Utopia

0

★★★★★
Five Stars

I must admit, Im not the biggest fan of British TV drama. We make very good literary adaptations, detective series and dress-porn, but we have very little to rival the heavyweight American trinity of The Sopranos, The Wire and Mad Men. A lot of this is not really anybodys fault. Britain will never be able to compete with America budget-wise and series run for only six episodes, giving less space for story development and magnifying imperfections. The need to keep the taxpayer (who partially subsidises not only the BBC but also Channel 4) happy probably also serves to limit the sense of creative freedom — a problem American cable series dont face.

This makes the achievement of the series Im reviewing all the more impressive. A series clearly driven on every level by a strong creative vision that knows exactly how to utilise its medium — a shining beacon of what can be achieved in British TV called, appropriately enough, Utopia. A blend of, among other things, conspiracy thriller, David Lynch movie and moral thought experiment; it manages to seem original and unique in style and content while remaining rigorously well thought out and put together. In fact it’s so good that HBO now want to make an American remake with David Fincher at the helm.

But what exactly is Utopia? Let me give you a brief synopsis — the series’motivating tensions are very real problems that overpopulation will wreak upon our planet and civilisation in the relatively near future. The series conceit is that in the 70s a scientist manufactured a protein which when injected, say as a fake vaccine, would make people completely infertile, bar a random 7 to 8% of the population who would be immune. The scientist later went mad, hiding away all information on how to manufacture the protein and scrawling cryptic drawings related to his experiments, which were later collected in a shady underground comic book. The first series revolved around the protagonists, ordinary, racially-diverse, awkwardly-British people brought together by their interest in the comic book, becoming embroiled in the machinations of the sinister Networkwhich aimed to discover the make up of the protein so it could release it in the fake Russian flu vaccine.

The current series kicked off with a flashback episode (shot on cool 70s era 4:3 celluloid) focusing on the scientist, Philip Carvel. This sounds, of course, a lot like somebodys conspiracy theory — and the jump into pulpy fantasy may come off as unsophisticated to some people — but it allows the creation of an incredibly engaging series that takes you to places unimaginable in a realist narrative. That the villainsin the story really do have a point elevates the moral complexity of the series, injecting difficult questions into what could easily have been a simplistic thrill-ride. If the Networks methods — a host of bizarre Lynchian assassins, including chocolate-raisin loving, dentists-gas wielding psychopath Arby (Neil Maskell) — are uncondonable, its clear they have a point. In fact, by the current series, one of the protagonists, the bizarrely named Wilson Wilson (Adeel Akhtar), has defected to their side- despite having been tortured (with a spoon) at their hands.

Speaking of which the series has drawn a fair amount of criticism for its eye-watering levels of violence. This will, Im sure, be a turnoff for many. For what its worth, the world depicted is so surreal and the violence so stylised, it never feels aversive — at least not to my post-modern, desensitised sensibilities. Theres something deliciously subversive feeling about watching such a high quality series that does not seem to care about being deemed unacceptable by any established arbiters of culture; it’s hard to imagine the forty-something attendees of a stereotypical Islington dinner party waxing lyrical about Utopia the way they would Mad Men.

In this, and many other ways, the series seems closer to graphic novels like Watchmen than any TV series. It shares with Watchmen the ‘rag-tag group of misfits drawn into conflict with shadowy organisation who actually, hang on, maybe have a point after all’ plot and a love of a specific colour I’m going to call ‘Selfridges Yellow’ (which appears everywhere from the title screen to a bag Arby carries around everywhere). Indeed, Utopia feels closer to the feel of that graphic novel than the 2009 film adaptation ever did.

But its also a series which plots its own path. Despite all the dark themes and disturbing goings-on, the series still manages to be very funny, always prepared to point out the absurdity of whats going on or allow for some classic awkward-British-people comedy. Becky (Alexandra Roach) and Ian (Nathan Stewart-Jarrett) are normal, not very well coordinated people caught up in a mind bending and absurd conspiracy, and the actors mine this seam for all its comedic potential. Its to their credit (as well as, Dennis Kelly — series creator and writer) that they always convincingly act as a normal person would in their situation, never falling into the po-faced heroics often found in American fantasy series like Heroes or Lost.

If this werent achievement enough, each character also elicits a lot of pathos from the viewer. You are acutely aware of the emotional consequences of the series events, and these are tactfully depicted, never becoming melodramatic. Particularly affecting is Fiona O’Shaughnessy’s portrayal of Jessica Hyde, the slightly Aspergers daughter of Philip Cavell and a woman whose entire life has been spent on the run from the network. Beginning this series in the Networks maximum-security prison complex, where they are trying to extract Cavells secrets from her by any means necessary, she brings to the role a sense of the tragic emptiness of a life lived outside the norms of society.

On almost every level, Utopia is an exquisitely crafted and engaging piece of drama. Its the shining example of what can be achieved in British TV, and raises the bar for future productions.

Seven sporting disasters

0

Unless you have been living in a cave you probably heard about that World Cup Semi-Final, you know the one – the most catastrophic World Cup defeat in the history of the competition. Brazil (5 times world champions) were trounced 7-1 in Belo Horizonte by a German team described by leading world experts (aka the BBC’s Match of the Day team) as “a ruthless well oiled machine”. Some described it as a “national humiliation”, others an “unfortunate game of football”. Within seconds of the game ending there were memes, tweets and posts mocking what had been a disaster for Brazilian football. Reports of Christ the Redeemer shaking his fists in rage were unconfirmed.

So that got Cherwell Sport to thinking; was this really the most embarrassing sporting defeat ever? Or have there been worse disasters? In our infinite wisdom, through meticulous research and debate, we have compiled a list of some of the most embarrassing sporting shocks.

1. Lindsey Jacobellis, Winter Olympics 2006.

The name may not be familiar. The incident probably is. Lindsey was cruising the final of the snowboard cross at the 2006 Turin Winter Olympics, with a 3 second, 47 meter lead over her opponent. The US competitor, in approaching the second jump decided to indulge in a bit of showboating. Attempting a celebratory “method grab” Lindsey managed to unbalance herself and fall, letting her opponent pass her, which meant she had to settle for a silver medal. Embarrassing? Yes. A national humiliation? You decide.

2. Rafael Nadal v Lukas Rosol/ Steve Darcis, Wimbledon 2012 & 2013

Tennis stars frequently lose. With 4 grand slams, a WTP championships and sometimes a bonus Olympic Games to play for, it is truly rare to find someone who wins everything each year. But nobody seems to know how to slip up quite as well as Rafael Nadal. In 2012, Nadal lost to someone who had not advanced beyond the first qualifying round of Wimbledon in 5 years. Lukas Rosol, ranked 100 in the world, dispatched the 14 time grand slam champion in a five set thriller. Reports that tendinitis had affected Nadal’s performance were unconfirmed (although the injury did make him pull out of the London Olympics later that summer). One year later he repeated the feat by losing in the 2013 version of Wimbledon to No 135 Steve Darcis, but this time in straight sets.  

3. England v Australia, 2013-14 Ashes series  

2013-14 was an odd time for English cricket. Managing to become the number one test team in the world in 2011 and having beaten Australia in the summer of 2013 3-0 at home, everyone was looking forward to another classic winter series. The Aussies had failed to win the ashes since 2007. What followed was not ideal. England lost the series 5-0, only the third Ashes clean sweep in history. The aftermath of the series saw a revamp of the England team – Swann retired, Pietersen was forced out- and now England have dropped to 5th in the world test rankings.

4. Garry Kasparov v Deep Blue, 1997

For those of you who are frightened of a post-apocalyptic society run by robots – this must have seemed like a bit of a watershed moment. Garry Kasparov was the world champion of chess, Deep Blue a supercomputer designed by boffins at IBM. A first game was played in Philedelphia in 1996 which Kasperov won 4-2. In a rematch the next year the computer won 3.5-2.5 although the game was tainted by Kasperov’s claim that the computer cheated. To the amazement of all Kasperov, considered the greatest chess player of all time, had lost to a machine.

5. Man City 6 v 1 Man Utd

If the World Cup has taught us anything, it is that we like to laugh at successful teams losing. Luckily for them, Brazil can take solace in the fact that this has happened before. Take the Premier League’s 2011 match between Man United and Man City. Nothing could have symbolised the rise of City over their historically successful rivals than a 6-1 thrashing at Old Trafford which signalled the beginning of the end of the Fergie era. Other Football shocks include the 2004 European Championships where a little known country called Greece managed to beat Portugal in their own tournament 1-0 to win the final- causing a 140-1 shock that will hopefully be repeated by England at the next tournament. Brazil have also been there before. In 1950, before Brazil had won a tournament, they lost 2-1 in the final to Uruguay in Rio, where only a draw would have seen them win the world cup.

6. Germany v Austria, 1982 World Cup

National humiliations come in all shapes and sizes. This one was embarrassing from an ethical perspective. Algeria had been the surprise of the tournament, beating Germany in the first game, and earning 6 points. They had beaten Chile earlier in the day. A win by one or two goals from Germany would see both them and Austria through. What followed was a national disgrace. Amid strong accusations of collusion- after Germany scored 1 goal within ten minutes neither side made any attempt to try to play football and instead opted for a boring version of keep ball for 80 minutes. Algerian fans were rightly outraged, throwing money onto the pitch. This year when they got their chance for revenge in the World Cup’s second round against the Germans. Algeria lost 2-1, but only after a heroic display that took them into extra time.    

7. USSR v USA, 1972 Olympic basketball, and 1980 Olympic ice hockey

There is nothing more embarrassing than when you lose to your superpower rival in the middle of a geo-political superpower conflict. The US had never lost an Olympic basketball game, the USSR were not really that well known for basketball. So when, during the 1972 Munich Summer Olympics the USSR won a last minute 81-80 victory, amid accusations of foul-play, there was national embarrassment aplenty. Fast-forward 8 year to New York- the cold war took another turn- this time in favour of the US. The “Miracle on Ice” (dubbed by the US media) saw a US team made up of amateur and collegiate players, defeat the USSR who had won 6 out of the last 7 winter Olympic ice hockey events. Both sides tried to take as much political capital as they could out of their respective victories.

Dawkins rape comments condemned

0

Oxford feminists have attacked tweets made by Richard Dawkins, in which he said that “stranger rape at knifepoint” was worse than “date rape”. He later tweeted similar comments comparing “mild date rape” and “violent date rape”.

He had earlier made tweets comparing the relative immorality of “mild paedophilia” and “violent pedophilia”.

Dawkins, a fellow of New College, and an internationally-renowned proponent of atheism, claimed to be attempting to illustrate a logical point on morality; namely, that by saying an action is worse than another, one does not automatically advocate the alternative action.

Oxford student and feminist campaigner Alice Nutting told Cherwell, “Dawkins’ tweets reveal his failure to grasp the severity of sexual violence. His abstract comparisons of ‘mild date rape’ to ‘violent date rape’ and ‘date rape’ to ‘stranger rape at knifepoint’ perpetuate myths about some forms of rape being worse than others.”

She continued, “The fact that he was making logical syllogisms does not absolve him of responsibility to approach these issues sensibly and sensitively; it was grossly insensitive and his refusal to recognise that is worrying.”

Likewise, former Wadham Students’ Union President Anya Metzer commented, “Dawkins’ decision to illustrate a point of logic with flippant and unnecessary references to ‘mild’ and ‘violent’ rape suggests he has more interest in garnering notoriety than teaching a lesson in argumentation. The idea of ranking forms of rape and the arbitrary and sweeping manner in which this was conducted belie a mind devoted for decades to scientific rigour.

“The deeply unsettling and provocative nature of his comments were clearly designed to bait the twitter audience and thus excite some attention around his frankly pedestrian point. It is greatly disheartening to see public figures and indeed scholars of our university contribute to the glib and insensitive treatment of rape found so commonly in the media.” 

Following widespread online criticism of his comments, Richard Dawkins has defended the tweets. Writing on his website, he said, “Actually, it’s rather plausible that some people might find date rape worse than being raped by a stranger – let’s leave the ‘at knifepoint’ out of it. Think of the disillusionment, the betrayal of trust in someone you thought was a friend. 

“But my logical point remains unchanged. It applies to any hypothetical X and Y, which could be reversed. Thus: ‘Being raped by a stranger is bad. Being raped by a formerly trusted friend is worse.’ If you think that hypothetical quotation is an endorsement of rape by strangers, go away and learn how to think.”

He added, “I wasn’t even saying it is right to rank one kind of rape as worse than another (that caused an immense amount of agony and a scarcely creditable level of vitriolic abuse in the Twittosphere). You may be one of those who thinks all forms of rape are equally bad, and should  not, in principle be ranked at all, ever.

“In that case my logical point won’t be relevant to you and you don’t need to take offence – although you might have trouble being a judge who is expected to give heavier sentences for worse versions of the same crime. All I was saying is that if you are one of those who is prepared to say that one kind of rape is worse than another (whichever particular kinds those might be), this doesn’t imply that you approve of the less bad one. It is still bad. Just not as bad.”

Cheltenham Music Festival: A page turner’s view

0

When I started work at the Cheltenham Music Festival on the 2nd July, I couldn’t have guessed that two days later I would be page turning in a headline concert. The evening was one of the centrepieces of the festival, featuring world-renowned violinist Nicola Benedetti, cellist Leonard Elschenbroich, pianist Alexei Grynyuk, violist Benjamin Gilmore, and violinist Alexander Sitkovetsky.

My role as page turner offered a rare snapshot into the behind the scenes lives of these musicians. While sitting in on the pre-concert rehearsal, it was comforting to realise that international professionals share many of the poor rehearsal habits that we normal folk have: while Grynyuk determinedly practised a tricky passage, Sitkovetsky and Elschenbroich argued over which of them would win in a fight against one another, and the amused Benedetti began to text a friend in the corner.

It is testament to the incredible talent of these performers that, during rehearsal, they were able to maintain a spellbinding level of musicianship while simultaneously sharing jokes and tips on each other’s playing. 

The atmosphere on the stage was electric. I was acutely aware of the intensity of the concert for audience and performers alike, yet felt oddly removed from the music itself. My part in all of it was as a cog: to carry out a function as quietly as possible, while the musical fireworks erupted all around me.

As an audience member, you forget the physical effort that goes into creating such a rousing performance. However, given my proximity to the artists, I was struck by the sheer visceral physicality of their performance, especially in the ‘rondo alla zingarese’, or ‘Gypsy rondo’ of the opening Brahms G minor piano quartet.

To see the tiny communicative glances and smiles between each performer gave me an impression of the power and spontaneity of each moment. All at once, I was acutely aware both of the mechanics of the performance itself and the incredible musicianship on display; the edges of all four musicians began to melt into one another to create one entity.

The most striking feature of the evening was the dynamically unbalanced nature of the programme. The last item, Shostakovich’s deeply introspective G minor piano quintet, could have felt anticlimactic; the explosive Brahms would arguably have suited the role of finale rather better. Yet the performers handled the immense emotional load born by the quintet very sensitively, leaving the crowd in stunned silence.

Cheltenham music festival has long been known as a cultivator of new music: the  concert included ‘Butterflies Remember a Mountain’, a new commission by female composer Arlene Sierra. Sandwiched between the Brahms and the Shostakovich, the piece complemented the programme’s focus on emotional transparency; its delicate scoring and use of fluttering extended techniques created a darkly wistful atmosphere.

The balance of emotion between this contemporary work and more standard repertoire felt entirely genuine. The overall effect of the concert was therefore one of reserved introspection, with the audience left spellbound after the final bars.

The opportunity to meet and work with such talented musicians was a privilege. Viewing the festival from a unique viewpoint was an experience that I will remember for a long time to come.

The tragedy of young suicide

0

Note: What follows touches upon sexual assault, eating disorders and suicide.

 

A family friend of mine took her own life last year.

Just writing that sentence, I can’t help but distance myself from the horrible enormity of it all by feeling as if I’ve just stepped into a slightly dark and melodramatic soap opera – but I haven’t. It’s real, and it happened. I don’t think I or anyone will ever fully understand how or why a fifteen year old girl could have ever reached a place so inescapably dark that she saw no other way out but to rid herself of her own existence not far from her childhood home.

However, whilst we must accept that it is impossible for anyone ever to comprehend the workings of her mind on that night, we can ask ourselves what could have been done, why the now-obvious triggers (a sexual assault at the age of fourteen, the onset of bulimia) that led to her death may not have been dealt with properly, and, most importantly, what can be done to raise awareness of the issue of young suicide, and to transform it from a hushed, taboo topic into something which is openly discussed. We must ensure that the mental health and emotional well-being of adolescents is taken completely seriously, that sufferers of mental health problems are neither overlooked nor stigmatised, and that their cries for help are not dismissed as selfish pleas for attention.

The most obvious changes which need to be made are those concerning mental health provisions. In this case, the girl in question wasn’t seen by a professional at the Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service (CAMHS) until a whole month after she was referred by a teacher whom she had approached to tell him of her bulimia. She saw a social worker from CAMHS – not a mental health specialist – the day before she died, and described the meeting as “horrible,” her father noting that the professional was “cold.” The school nurse in charge of her case was, at that time, dealing with 25 schools in a 26 hour working week. At this school alone, there were 40 active cases. Her school counsellor moved away just weeks after she had begun dealing with this case, resulting in an inadequate handover: in a meeting lasting fifteen minutes, plans for their futures of six children were discussed, according to evidence given by teachers at the case inquest.

It seems obvious that this young girl slipped through the net, that the severity of the consequences of her sexual assault and eating disorder were underestimated. While blame cannot be placed exclusively at anyone’s door, and mistakes were unfortunate rather than premeditated, it is clear that mental health and counselling services need to be drastically improved.

This comes at a time when austerity measures mean public services such as CAMHS are having their budgets cut dramatically; YoungMinds, a UK charity committed to improving the emotional wellbeing and mental health of children and young people, has found that two thirds of local authorities in England have reduced their CAMHS budget since 2010. One council reported to YoungMinds a drop of 41% in their CAMHS budget from 2010.

Why is it, then, that these essential services are being targeted by an out of touch government looking to reduce its deficit and expenditure? Why is it that campaigns seeking to improve mental health services for young people, led by charities such as YoungMinds and Papyrus, appear to be being perpetually ignored, when suicide remains the leading cause of death amongst young people?

Another important lesson to be taken from this case finds its basis in general societal attitudes towards suicide and mental health. Suicide is seldom discussed – understandably, due to its upsetting nature – but it is nevertheless an inescapable and pertinent truth. Around 4,400 people take their own lives every year in the UK – and this is a conservative estimate, as coroners are reluctant to give a verdict of suicide at an inquest, simply because the legal requirement – that all other possibilities are proven beyond reasonable doubt to be impossible – is so specific and difficult to reach.

Surely, by discussing this issue so reluctantly, we are doing a disservice to charities such as Papyrus which aim to combat the issue. Had discussion and training concerning mental health been more widespread, teachers and support staff would perhaps have been quicker to recognise the seriousness of the traumatic experiences and dark thoughts being relayed to them by this fifteen-year-old girl, and to label them as possible warning signs for self-harm or suicide, despite their perceptions of her as confident and well-adjusted.

By recognising the potentially devastating consequences of mental health issues, we can go some way to tackling them; as a society, we will be more able to spot warning signs, to develop preventative measures, and to provide bereaved relatives with the necessary support in the tragic case that a suicide cannot be prevented.

Attending the memorial service of a young girl who had her whole life ahead of her, as well as the subsequent inquest into the details of the events leading up to her suicide, was, from an entirely selfish point of view, emotionally draining. The suffering that her close family and friends have undergone is unimaginable – and made worse by the thought that things could have been different, that she could have been helped, that this tragedy could have been avoided. If there is one positive to be drawn from the incident, it is that it has exemplified a culture of fear, denial and ignorance surrounding the issue of suicide, and reinforces the need for change – in terms of mental health support and provisions on a practical level, and in terms of our own attitudes towards mental health and suicide emotionally and culturally.

Students and alumni compete in Commonwealth Games

0

Past and present students of the University have been competing in the 2014 Commonwealth Games in Glasgow. The Games began last week and will last until the 3rd of August, and there are six Oxford students or alumni involved. 

Daniel Hooker, 2013 Men’s Captain of Oxford University Athletics Club, has competed in the T37 100m race, which involves athletes with cerebral palsy. He won the British University & Colleges Sport’s disability 100m earlier this year.

Speaking to Cherwell, Daniel praised the University for helping develop his sporting abilities. He commented, “I guess the main thing Oxford gave me in terms of sport was a great club atmosphere, because the big event of the year (Varsity) is judged a success or failure based on the team result there is much more team spirit than you get at a lot of other athletics clubs, including other university clubs.

“Having those team-mates around you really motivates you to keep training and, especially if you’re one of the best athletes, you want to set an example for the group as a whole … I must also mention my former coach Mark Thomas who I met at Oxford, as well as jumps coach Paddy O’Shea.”

Hooker went on to add, “Overall, I am very proud to represent Oxford as well as England first and foremost at these Commonwealth Games and show that we can produce elite athletes as well as elite academics. I also look forward to seeing my former Dark Blue team-mate Luke Caldwell at the Games, even if he is representing Scotland!” Luke Caldwell is a 2012 Oxford Graduate who will be representing Scotland in the 5000m and 10,000m races.

Another Oxford competitor is Dan Fox, a Teddy Hall alumnus who was selected for England’s hockey team. He took part in England’s 6-1 victory over Trinidad & Tobago and the team is currently top of Pool B. During his time at Oxford he was also strongly involved in cricket, scoring 104 for Oxford in the 2004 Varsity Match.

Meanwhile backstroke swimmer James Jurkiewicz achieved a lifetime record with 1:00.51 in the 100m backstroke, which also won his heat. James graduated this year with a degree in Engineering from Hertford College and will compete in a total of six races.

The University is running a webpage with daily updates on the progress of Oxford athletes. The page can be accessed here.

Review: Grand Central

0

★★★★☆
Four Stars

“See. You felt everything. Fear, worry, blurred vision, dizziness, shaky legs. That’s the full experience.” These are the words of Lea Seydoux’s Karole to Tahar Rahim’s Gary after their first romantic encounter, making explicit the central conceit of Grand Central, a French romantic drama which explores the toxicity of love through a forbidden affair forged in the shadow of a nuclear power plant. Gary is a migrant worker who joins a team of labourers led by Karole’s fiancé that works in the innermost sections of the reactor. Here, tensions mount as loyalties are tested and lives put in danger, lending the film an unexpected claustrophobia, even whilst the disparate tones of Rebecca Zlotowski’s film never entirely connect. 

Whilst the film’s title ostensibly refers to the name of its nuclear power plant setting, its ironic bent becomes clear within minutes of the film’s opening, as we observe that little about these character’s lives is either grand or centralised, with their time divided between minimum wage work at the plant and a mundane existence in an impoverished trailer park. It is here that the lovers’ secret affair occurs, but it is in the plant where it threatens to unravel tenuous but vital bonds of loyalty. Compounded by the divisions of class and gender inherent in the film’s setting, the film develops an escalating sense of peril which sustains into the film’s credits. Zlotowski’s interest in the peripheral existence of the cast of migrants, gypsies and criminals imbues the film with social realism and capitalist critique, as the disadvantaged characters sell their health, identity and futures to the plant’s toxic operation.

For all these poetic and academic ambitions that distance Zlotowski’s directorial voice from that of the characters, both are deeply preoccupied with the properties of skin, particularly how it is displayed and concealed. An early flirtation which sees our lovers’ bodies trapped behind white work overalls cuts to a later scene of his arm pressed tightly against her naked leg in a secretive and sexually charged exchange in the back of a car. These juxtapositions of concealment and exposure show how these lovers find comfort and sexuality in each others skin, even as they view their own with increasing paranoia.

Zlotowski’s camera lingers over the characters’ bare flesh as they go about their days, capturing glimpses of the eroticism they find in their forbidden liaisons. The recurring shots of manic scrubbing and relentless showering combine the tension of the plant with the tensions of the affair; the lovers struggle to scrub the traces of radiation from their bodies, but also traces of each other. This constant eroticism effectively foregrounds the simmering romance at the story’s core, even whilst the elements of social realist drama occasionally threaten to overwhelm it.

However, the film operates as a strange mix of genres and ideas, with the saturated blues and greens of the excruciatingly tense scenes inside the plant reminiscent of science fiction, whilst around the trailer park the film shifts between gritty drama and romanticised sex scenes which unfold in sun dappled fields. These varying tones capture the conflicting moods of the film, and illuminate the fractured relationships at the core of the narrative, but the shifts between them feel uneasy, and consequently the film never coalesces into an entirely satisfactory whole.

Furthermore, the film’s attempts to balance its lyricism with its realism results in several overwritten scenes that sacrifice consistency of character to the film’s larger points about the destructive power of love. This imbalance is also felt in the predictable ending, where the film’s poetic sensibilities overpower the narrative, leaving the emotional arcs of the characters feeling somewhat incomplete.

With regards to the film’s performances, Tahar Rahim makes for a likeable protagonist, playing his undereducated labourer with a sweet innocence even as he knowingly jeopardises the safety of himself and those around him for his own selfishness. Meanwhile Lea Seydoux brings her usual intensity to the part of Karole, filling the screen with a confidence and barely suppressed rage which is gradually stripped away to reveal some of the actresses’ most delicate and affecting work to date. Seydoux uses her aggressive femininity to challenge the male character’s dichotomous sexual identities and machismo, bringing an added dimension to the film’s social exploration. The ensemble cast also deliver affecting work in supporting roles, particularly Denis Ménochet as Karole’s fiancé, who adds shades of sadness and jealousy beneath his character’s macho facade.

Ultimately, Grand Central‘s themes and performances are interesting enough for the film to remain compelling even as it struggles to decide on its identity.  Rebecca Zlotowski has crafted a poetic examination of forbidden love which is grounded in a fascinating exploration of marginalized workers, and in which the potent setting creates a consistent tension that elevates the film over other contemporary romances.