Blog Page 1415

The Carfax by-election should concern us all

0

Last week, the ward of Carfax, in Oxford city centre, held an election. Or, it sort of did. To be precise, thirty percent of it held an election. Seventy percent of the electorate, the student population of Carfax, was out of town. The winning candidate – a member of the city’s ruling Labour Party – was eventually elected by a majority of those who turned up: 3.6% of the overall electorate.

It’s not clear exactly what happened behind the scenes when the decision was made to hold the by-election, but it’s probably not jumping the gun to say that these headline figures – the thinnest democratic mandate in British history, according to some sources – look very bad.

The situation surrounding the election is still somewhat unclear. The previous Labour councillor in that ward, Anne-Marie Canning – who, it should be mentioned, won her seat in 2012 in an entirely regular election – announced her resignation in July, citing personal circumstances. A by-election date was set for the 4th of September.

It may be that some of the backlash against the council’s decision to go ahead with the exercise is politically fuelled – the local Green Party would clearly like a second crack at the seat when the student demographic returns. It’s also true that Oxford students are out of town, in any case, for more than half the year. It’s a little hyperbolic to talk of students being “disenfranchised” – students who wanted to vote could have done so by postal ballot. The decision to go ahead with the by-election was not in any way illegal. But, having exhausted these few caveats, there is little else to be said in the council’s defense.

It would be reasonable to expect more from our elected representatives than a minimum standard of legality. The process of triggering the election appears to have been manipulated – known Labour supporters accounted for both of the two letters of petition which triggered the by-election. The local Labour branch would have known which date the ensuing contest would subsequently take place. They would also have known that the full, term-time electorate of the area returned a Green councillor the last time it voted, in May of this year.

It is saddening, at best, to see parties resort to this kind of cynical machine politics, in which this year’s electoral harvest trumps the need for any kind of authentic, long-term dialogue with voters. It’s saddening, too, to see a mainstream party of the centre-Left recoil from the student vote; any progressive party worth its salt should be engaging with the student movement, not trying to sideline it. The local party’s behaviour is all the more depressing to me personally, as I happen to be a Labour member.

As to what should happen next, it is surely clear that Alex Hollingsworth (the winning candidate) must submit himself to a fresh election during term time. Even setting aside the circumstances surrounding the planning of the election, there is a strong case to be made that accepting a seat won on 3.6% of the voting roll would be shabby behaviour.

While only two signatures were needed to trigger the original by-election, over one hundred have now been collected on a petition calling for a re-run. It is always awkward, of course, for an elected representative to stand down before the end of their term, but nothing must come between the voters and their rights. If observing those rights means leaving a seat vacant, or filling it with a temporary, caretaker councillor, then the council should do just that. Student voters – apathetic part-timers though we may be – deserve a chance.

 

Preview: OxfordOxford Festival

0

South Parks is famous for its views over the spires of the city (as well as being the bane of any cross-country runner) and later this month, from the 26th to the 28th of September, it will play host to a brand new festival: OxfordOxford, one that promises to be so good, they’ve named it twice. It’s the brainchild of E11E entertainment director and Oxford Brookes alumnus Owen Kent, who was inspired by the vibrancy of Reading and Electric Picnic festivals to work in the events industry. The key difference with OxfordOxford is that it hopes to celebrate the community of the city hand in hand with culture.

Like many students old and current, he is familiar with the Oxford music scene, recalling the highs of gigs at “Zodiac, Pub Oxford, Jericho Tavern, Bullingdon and Wheatsheaf” and the lows of “DJ Luck and MC Neat at Park End… and an incredibly awkward experimental music half hour on the Cowley Road”. He is thrilled to be finally going live with a project which has been years in the making: “I lived on Cowley Road while studying music at Brookes and became infatuated with Oxford and its music scene. As a student I wanted to develop an event for the City and after nearly 10 years of planning it’s amazing to have this opportunity”. As for the name, Kent explains that “my business partner, Anthony Norris, was the brain behind it, basing on the concept of New York, New York”. 

In its inaugural year, the ambitious programming promises a soaring start to what might, with support from the people of Oxford, become a regular feature in the city’s already hectic schedule. Of course, to stand out among the many events already out there, something new has to be introduced to the stage, and this festival promises to uniquely dedicate each of its three days to film, music and community.

The flavour of the festival’s Film Friday is indiscriminate interactivity, with the programme headed up by a sing-along version of Grease and a dance-along version of Dirty Dancing (it hasn’t been confirmed whether fancy dress is recommended in order to add to the effect). Some will jump at the chance of singing along to the lyrics of ‘Grease Lightning’, and for those who are apprehensive that any attempt to emulate the moves of Patrick Swayze will result in nothing but embarrassment, the screenings of Tim Burton’s Alice In Wonderland, or of 80s classics Top Gun and The Goonies might make preferable viewing on the 32-foot cinema screen. 

Electonic groups Tuung and Pixel Fix (an act tipped for great things by the festival’s directors) are amongst the healthy line up of acts with Oxfordshire links set to make an appearance on the music Saturday, and in the spirit of this, the BBC’s Introducing stage will host local acts and Oxford circuit regulars Flights of Helios, Balloon Ascents and pop rock trio Robot Swans. Well established names from beyond the county make an appearance too, having been won over by the concept behind the festival. Klaxons, fresh from the release of album Love Frequency and making an Oxford exclusive appearance for 2014 will headline the Saturday, with support from Katy B and Gaz Coombes (the former Supergrass frontman and Oxford local, with a host of solo accolades under his belt). There’s also a set presented by Movement Records, featuring Michael Kiwanuka and Celeste in what the directors hope will be a “house-band style showcase of the label’s talents”.

A cornerstone of the festival is its important partnerships: official charity partner, Oxfam, Oxford City Council and of course the local community and small businesses (residents of the city and beyond with an OX postcode get a special discount for the entire weekend). As an all-encompassing festival, its organisers promise it will bring out the best of Oxford’s cultural pedigree (G&Ds, Missing Bean and the Oxford University Quiddich team all make an appearance on Sunday) within a line up worthy of larger festivals in even larger fields, but brought alive in the surroundings of a unique city (without the camping). And while it has been a event which has remained relatively under the radar until recently, the entire billing, from Film Friday to “something-for-everyone Sunday”, is definitely something to get very excited about before the start of term. 

Prince William opens new China Centre building at St Hugh’s

0

The Duke of Cambridge was at St Hugh’s College this afternoon to open a new £21m China Centre library, hours after Kensington Palace announced that the Duchess is expecting their second child.

The Duchess was due to join her husband in the traditional Chinese ribbon cutting ceremony, but had to withdraw as a result of severe morning sickness.

Prince William arrived at the college around 1.30pm, greeted by a large crowd that had started gathering an hour before.

The Duke abated the curiosity and concerns of well-wishers with a few words about his pregnant wife, explaining, “she is feeling ok. It has been a tricky few weeks or so but we basically are thrilled. It is great news. It is early days, we are hoping things settle down and she is feeling better.”

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG%%10163%%[/mm-hide-text]

After meeting benefactors and friends and supporters of the college, he was given a tour of the new library during which he was shown the Selden Map of China. Recognised as the earliest map to show shipping routes linking Ming-era China to markets in South Asia and beyond, it underwent major conservation work in 2008 and was exhibited in China earlier this year.

A plaque was then unveiled, which bore the name of the Duke and Duchess, despite the absence of the latter.

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG%%10160%%[/mm-hide-text]

Prince William then cut the ribbon in a traditional Chinese ceremony, before departing just after 4pm.

The Dickson Poon University of Oxford China Centre Building – the library’s full title – cost a total of £21m, and was named after Hong Kong philanthropist Mr Dickson Poon CBE, who donated £10m towards the cost of the building.

A statement on the College website explains, “This building will, for the first time, bring together academics drawn from across a range of disciplines, who have in common research and teaching interests related to China.

“The building will also provide 63 en-suite student bedrooms, a 100 seat lecture theatre, dining area and a range of conference and seminar facilities.  It will also contain a dedicated library with study carrels and a reading room, which will provide a permanent home for books from the Bodleian Library’s China Collection.”

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG%%10161%%[/mm-hide-text]

St Hugh’s principal Dame Elish Angiolini announced, “St Hugh’s is extremely proud to have raised £20 million for this new development, and we are confident that through continued fundraising we will soon have the total amount needed. We are immensely grateful to our donors for helping us to provide such attractive, modern facilities for the students, Fellows and wider community at St Hugh’s.”

Media attention was understandably far greater than anticipated following the announcement of the royal baby. The college’s Head of Communications and Marketing, Kate Pritchard, tweeted, “A pleasure to meet HRH The Duke of Cambridge today @StHughsCollege #Oxford. He spent so much time speaking to staff, students and visitors.”

The delights of being a Buda-guest

0

I’m more than a bit worried for Budapest. After visiting the city for just 4 days I can see that its defences are down, and it is totally unaware of its impending fate. Because the thing about Budapest is, it’s just so bloody nice. Either you’ve been there yourself, and so have been carelessly spreading the word about it for a couple of years already, or you’ve already heard from your friends in their post-interrailing loose-tongued state. Just like planet earth and global warming, Budapest is at a crucial tipping point: the British tourism tipping point.

So many people are catching on to the secret that it is basically a warmer, cheaper, friendlier, funner Paris, that eventually it will be the next Paris. There’ll be British people scurrying across the Chain bridge like a blight of red ants in no time. The restaurants will start cooking up batches of chips, bars will serve drinks out of fish bowls to inbetweenerslook-a-likes, and the locals’ Hungarian hospitality willundoubtedly wear thin.

But I have a dirty secret to tell. I think I might have just helped to push it over the edge. My trip wasn’t just some city-break with friends, or mad last minute dash with the work-weary family – I went to Budapest with a guy who was looking to latch on to the Eastern European hype while there still remains a dearth of travel journalism on the place. Collecting research for a national newspaper, he got a free few nights’ stay in the Four Seasons, and who am I but a poor little student who is certainly not going to say no to tagging along on a trip like that?

I wasn’t going to play it cool either. This being my only holiday this year, my mentality was ‘go hard or go home’. It started in the airport – I couldn’t help myself. I went straight to Smiths and bought the most comprehensive travel guide I could find on the city. Completely ignoring my friend on the plane, I devoured that book cover to cover, pen at hand, annotating a great unfurled map at my side. I didn’t stop till the job was done.

Once we were at the hotel, I discovered something even more deliciously satiating than that. Coming from a family who believes that your own room in the tent in Wales is travel luxury, I had never before encountered the joys of a concierge. That lovely man standing at his desk all day long, just waiting to impart his wealth of wisdom on the secrets of the city to you. There’s even a little button on the phone in the room that connects you straight through to him.

Safe to say then that I was the best, most informative little travel writer’s helper for those four days, and as a consequence, we visited everything that Budapest had to offer.We went to the Schenzyi Baths at night, when DJs played to throngs of bikini clad party goers in the sulphurous waters. We marvelled at the beauty of secessionist painting and architecture in the Castle District. We ate delicious goulash and feasted on traditionally cooked duck breast in restaurants ranging from the delightfully kitsch to the imposingly beautiful. We whiled away the hours exploring the multifarious rooms of the eclectically furnished ruin pubs and clubs of the Jewish district.

It was the perfect holiday, and it makes me feel all the worse for it. Because Budapest doesn’t deserve the wrath of a million drunk Englishmen who just want to chew it up and spit it out after a 7 day bender. So, don’t believe what my friend tells you when the news hits the stands. Don’t book your ticket, put your bucket hat back on the shelf, and let’s all just leave that smiling Hungarian city alone.

 

Review: Two Days, One Night

0

★★★★☆
Four Stars

Marion Cotillard stuns as a woman fighting for her job, her mortgage and her sanity in the Dardenne brothers’ latest, Two Days, One Night,  a socially conscious drama of one woman’s struggle to return to work after a bout of depression. The film is terrifically acted and astutely observed, a morality tale pitting empathy and human connections against the pursuit of profit in a tidily constructed capitalist critique.

Cotillard has always excelled at playing characters caught between extremes – the professional highs and personal lows of Edith Piaf in La Vie en Rose, the loss and recovery of her amputee whale trainer, Stéphanie in Rust and Bone – and here she excels herself, her Sandra capable of summoning a fierce determination which can collapse into a hopeless abyss without hitting a false note. It is a testament to Cotillard that Sandra’s polarised emotions never feel like two separate characters, with the performance anchored in a captivating brittleness. She holds the screen with every flicker of the eye, every twitch of a finger. We watch for any indicator that she’s about to break. It’s an incredibly restrained performance which somehow manages to tell us everything.

The film’s repetitive structure – Sandra must see her 16 co-workers individually throughout the weekend to convince them to sacrifice their bonus for her job – is systematic, designed to subject our protagonist to the same cruelties and social humiliations over and over again. Whilst this could have easily made for an unengaging narrative, the Dardennes turn the repetition into a virtue, with the film’s tapestry of repeated phrases and familiar arguments reappearing in new ways, showing us the gathering strength of our protagonist through their different applications.

Furthermore, the structure rarely feels too forced, as the richly drawn characters and human stories at the forefront of each interaction are so believable and engaging. Unfortunately, the truthfulness of the human stories fails to save the plot’s final twist from proving a contrivance too far. Whilst the twist engineers a satisfying resolution to Sandra’s emotional journey, its tidiness undermines a certain amount of the previously created realism by laying bare the machinations of the script.

The Dardennes wisely keep these blue collar character’s arguments pragmatic; the immorality of their decision is almost never debated, with the characters instead attempting only to weigh their needs against Sandra’s.The film’s naturalistic style, lacking a musical score or elaborate camerawork, provides little insight into Sandra’s internal life, instead offering us only the emotions Sandra allows to play across her face.

The depth of her emotional concealment often wrong foots the viewer, whose connection with her can be easily upended by an erratic turn in her behaviour, and yet the Dardenne brothers offer just enough to make Sandra engaging – she loves her children, needs to keep her house and wants to stay off the dole. This combination of distance and intimacy allow us to empathise with Sandra without viewing her bonus favouring colleagues as adversaries.

The almost faultless supporting cast use their scenes to flesh out the multitude of responsibilities pulling at their characters, even if a few actors fail to take us on a believable emotional journey.Through these people we experience the constant distractions of modern life. Everyone’s existence  is divided, their loyalties, their multiple jobs, their families. It’s there in the constantly ringing phone, in the blaring traffic, in the bass line of a distant radio, in a car’s wailing seat belt alarm. We feel these people’s exhaustion, even as we will them to endure more hardship.

The film is ultimately an examination of the human costs of a financial system which doesn’t account for them. It’s a hopeful portrait of a bleak situation. It’s wonderfully acted and delicately told. It’s a simple film about big things. It’s a film of highs and lows, and it’s absolutely worth the journey.

Another modernised Othello, why not?

0

News that a touring production of Othello will usher in this year’s winter programme at the Oxford Playhouse is hardly a bolt out of the blue. Shakespeare’s verses gracing our stage once more is about as predictable as death at the end of a tragedy, while any buzz surrounding this performance’s ‘unique’ selling point – lo and behold, it’s a modern adaptation! – is likely to be the portentous murmur of disgruntled audiences, threatening,Oth “So bloody help me if it’s another all-female cast!”

Of course, it wouldn’t be the Playhouse, or perhaps any other self-respecting UK theatre for that matter, if a slice of Shakespeare weren’t on the menu from time to time. Despite the debates and dissertations about the ethics of adaptation, it appears as if our favourite tragedies and comedies without all that Elizabethan malarkey, are as much part of our staple diet as they are in their original performance conditions. But, in the case of Frantic Assembly’s six-year-old production, is our bellyaching about a surfeit of Shakespeare truly warranted? 

Both the qualms about too much Shakespeare and those protesting his disappearance into the mists of 21st century re-workings are shortly to be silenced. Bringing to the fore both adapted and original scripts, Frantic Assembly is a leading physical theatre company whose founding directors and choreographers, Graham and Hoggett, are devoted to a practice that incorporates movement, design, visuals and storytelling, pushing each element to its limit. I first saw Frantic’s Othello when it toured in 2008, and the stubborn purist in me was seduced by this dynamic style of theatre from the word, ‘Tush!’

It would be no great feat to gush about the visual compulsion of the performance, the intensity and brutality of the conflict that unfolds amidst the warmth and vibrancy of a northern English pub, as top-dog Moor (a not so subtle nod to the Moor of Venice) takes on his rivals, the Turks. High-paced bar-room brawls are punctured by moments of balletic tenderness, underscored by streams of electronic dance music and the spinning lights of a slot machine. The production is a hot-blooded feast for the eyes, ears and heart, but what else would you expect when a dance-based company takes on a drama that pulsates as much in verse as in raw emotion?

Those who recoil from the likes of Hamlet, Macbeth, and Julius Caesar will be comforted to learn that Frantic’s Othello has an Iago-like mastery of deception in its manipulation of the original text.  Trickery and deception is there in every touch, every shape, every push and pull: seduced by the sheer immaculacy of the piece, enamoured by death and tragedy, against our will brutality becomes beauty. This is an attraction that disturbs our moral compass, and one that Shakespeare knew well to play with. His original wit and insight is still there, and somehow in action speaks louder than words.

Maybe Frantic’s modern adaptation isn’t all it’s predicted to be. Of course, surprises in Shakespeare are somewhat hard to come by, and debates surrounding his theatrical dominance are customarily heated. However, this October’s Othello has the potential to remind us of that blind passion from which ignorance is born. 

Frantic Assembly’s Othello will be performed at the Oxford Playhouse from the 21st to the 25th October.

Sziget 2014: Hungary’s answer to Glastonbury?

0

When a friend first suggested trying out an international festival, and one in Hungary at that, I was more than a little skeptical. However, the impressive line-up, its location on an island in the Danube and critics’ claims that Sziget was an “European Glastonbury” soon had us parting with our money and scouring for cheap flights.

Sziget did not disappoint. A week long fusion of arts and culture, it featured headliners such as Blink-182 and Queens of The Stone Age (the sheer energy of the former rivalling the slick riffs of the latter), as well as The Prodigy, Imagine Dragons, and Outkast. These bands were interspersed with DJ sets from Skrillex and Calvin Harris, whilst The Kooks, Bastille and Jake Bugg performed more relaxed sets earlier on in the day

.

The dominance of British and American bands on the main stage was a little bittersweet at first. Although the line up was fantastic, it did seem somewhat pointless to travel to Hungary to see bands that also graced the line-ups of British festivals.

However, the main stage did hold a few unexpected musical gems. Ska-P drew us in with an intriguing, but funky, blend of ska and punk. Their set further verged on the bizarre when serious political videos were set to crazy brass solos and a series of satirical characters began to populate the stage.

We could easily have spent the entire week at the main stage. Yet it was when we ventured further afield that we found the most exciting and alternative bands. Sziget’s World Village Stage lived up to its name, playing host to a range of bands hailing from Mali, Argentina and Jamaica amongst many others. Here, the standard nod and bob of the main stage turned into an impromptu conga, whilst mosh pits became circles of something which may have been Romanian folk dancing (either way it involved a lot of kicking).

The fantastic music was offset by a variety of art stalls and cultural events that took place throughout the week. The island was littered with art installations, meaning that a walk back to the tent often involved an encounter with some sculpture or another; the camping areas themselves had been decorated with fairy lights, paper jellyfish, flags and balloons.

Sziget represents an explosion of musical and artistic freedom following years of paranoia and repression under communist rule. It has it’s own dedicated LGBTQ area hosting talks, films, and music dedicated to queer culture, as well as an Afro-Latin area, where we learned an African dance before heading over to the Hungarian tent to try our hands at traditional crafts.

Sziget certainly lived up to the critical hype that surrounded it. I can’t wait to go back.

Labour hold Carfax ward in controversial by-election

0

The Labour party has won a by-election in Oxford’s Carfax ward, which is largely populated by students. Labour’s Alex Hollingsworth, a past City Councillor who ran unsuccessfully for the seat this May, won with 168 votes. The Liberal Democrats were second on 101 and the Green party third on 63 votes.

The by-election was triggered following the resignation of Labour city councillor Anne-Marie Canning in July, who cited personal reasons for her decision. Approximately 70% of Carfax Ward residents are students.

Each ward has two representatives on Oxford City Council and they are elected on an alternate basis, meaning that every two years there is an election for one seat. Anne-Marie Canning had won her seat in 2012, while the other seat was won by the Green party in May 2014.

Although students were allowed to register for postal votes overall turnout at the election was low, at around 8.6%. This is compared to a 37% turnout in the same ward last May. The May election saw a Green party candidate elected.

When previously asked about the timing of the by-election, Deputy Leader of Oxford City Council Ed Turner told Cherwell, “It would be completely unacceptable to leave students without a second ward councillor, especially at the crucial start of term period, and delaying the by-election would serve no useful purpose as the electoral register would be massively out of date until March.  It would include last year’s finalists who no longer live in Oxford, but exclude first years. I would encourage any students keen to participate to apply for a postal vote.”

Nevertheless, the holding of the election outside of term-time has seen hostile reaction.

Tony Brett, a past Liberal Democrat councillor, commented, “I thank Anne-Marie Canning for her work for the people of Carfax and point out that her resignation did not automatically trigger a by-election – that requires a request from two voters anywhere in the City.  That request came just days later from two known Labour supporters and Labour will have known exactly on which date that would cause the-by-election to happen…  I believe Labour’s actions were a cynical way to disenfranchise the huge numbers of students (who I imagine they think all vote Green) who are registered to vote in Carfax ward but are away on long vacation.”

Adam Ramsay, Co-Editor of OurKingdom on Open Democracy and past full time campaigner with People & Planet, wrote “a ‘rotten borough’ election in Oxford has won Labour a councillor on the lowest turnout in British electoral history – robbing the Greens of a winnable seat. The by-election in a mainly student ward was timed for the summer vacation – disenfranchising 60% of voters.”

He also added “8.6% is apparently the lowest turnout in British electoral history. It provides no mandate at all.”

Student campaigner Nathan Akehurst has created a petition to ‘acknowledge that the Carfax by-election was against the spirit of democracy and step down.’  The petition calls for Alex Hollingsworth to stand down and run in a by-election during term term, and currently has almost a hundred supporters as well as the Oxford University Liberal Democrats. Nathan Akehurst told Cherwell “turnout and presence issues aside, big parties often use snap by-elections to concentrate resources and crowd out popular smaller parties and independents- this summer Oxford Labour alone have used the tactic three times.”

Green Group Leader and councillor Sam Hollick commented on the party’s website, “this was a ‘sham election’ engineered by Labour to maximise their  chances of retaining their remaining seat in Carfax ward following their defeat by the full electorate in May. I feel most sorry for the disenfranchised majority of electors.”

However, OULC has defended the decision. It stated “the turnout was disappointing, but in order for all the new freshers and students returning to live in college after living out to be able to vote, the election would have had to have been held in December when the new electoral register is published. This would have deprived Carfax of representation for too long, and it is unfair to suggest that Anne-Marie Canning, Alex’s predecessor, should have continued for several months in a job she felt unable to fulfil to the best of her ability after moving to London.  It is also good to have a councillor in place, rather than a vacancy, at the start of a new academic year so students have the most effective representation at this busy time.”

What film/TV programme is your college?

0

St Hugh’s – Journey to the Centre of the Earth

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%10147%%[/mm-hide-text] 

Two places that have never had human eyes laid on them: the Earth’s core and St Hugh’s. So seemingly close yet in reality so unbelievably far away, it’s almost certainly easier to bore through thirty miles of igneous rock than it is to travel that far down Banbury Road. But that won’t stop intrepid explorers from trying (and then realising it’s just not worth the hassle).

 

St. Hilda’s – Shutter Island

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%10148%%[/mm-hide-text] 

A strange, enclosed island where incredibly dangerous mad people are kept by equally sinister clipboard-wielding doctor types. But who are the patients and who are the doctors? No one enters, no one leaves, and no one is sure of its exact location. Reports of supernatural activity, cannibalism and loose satanic connections remain unconfirmed. 

 

University – Film

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%10150%%[/mm-hide-text] 

You may never have heard of Film, Samuel Beckett’s only screenplay, but even if that is the case you know instantly what you’re dealing with as a result of the most self-explanatory name in the history of self-explanatory names. Univ’s founder, William of Durham, was evidently a similar fan of self-referential post-modern piss-taking.

 

Exeter – The Hunger Games

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%10151%%[/mm-hide-text] 

A starved dystopia where legions of enslaved adolescents are forced to fight for the right to eat, Exeter is starting to resemble Suzanne Collins’ Panem a worrying amount after last year’s Hall price debacle. Let’s hope the revolution catches fire sooner rather than later.

 

St Catherine’s – The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%10152%%[/mm-hide-text] 

Dark and Danish, Catz could have been The Killing. Or The Bridge. Or literally any of the other Scandicrime media that your parents have enjoyed watching over the last eight years or so. With that in mind, what could be more appropriate than the most perverse of the lot, The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo? Everyone’s heard the rumoured horrors lurking in the dark basements of Arne Jacobsen’s industrial glass-and-concrete leviathan.

 

Balliol – The Thick of It

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%10153%%[/mm-hide-text] 

Filled with wannabe Margaret Thatchers and Alistair Campbells, the corridors bristle with barely concealed political subterfuge and conspiracies coated in an inescapable sense of ineptitude and an inclination to enormous cock-ups. ‘Catastrofuck’, ‘omnishambles’ and ‘as useful as a marzipan dildo’ are regularly heard echoing around the JCR. 

 

Christchurch – Titanic

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%10154%%[/mm-hide-text]

The flagship of the fleet; a decadently gleaming monument to human ingenuity/intellectual achievement. A tourist attraction like no other, it draws visitors from far and wide. From the outside, an awe-inspiring monolith. On the inside, spacious, luxuriously furnished and with an elite clientele. But the decadent façade eventually ruptures. And all it reveals is a wreck at the bottom of the Atlantic festooned with Leonardo Di Caprio’s frozen corpse. 

 

All Soul’s – Psycho

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%4275%%[/mm-hide-text]

Just like the Bates Motel, All Soul’s is somewhere you’d never want to find yourself: a perpetually deserted labyrinth of abandoned rooms and eerily quiet quads, run by a secretive and frankly unnerving set of owners/tutors. And then before you know it, you find yourself being stabbed in the shower by a psycho dressed up in their long-dead mother’s clothes. Probably best just to stay away. 

New domestic abuse laws are vital and long overdue

0

Warning: This article contains sensitive and potentially distressing discussion (including examples) of emotional abuse and domestic violence.

In 2013, the Home Office defined “domestic abuse” as “any incident or pattern of incidents of controlling, coercive, threatening behaviour, violence or abuse between those aged 16 or over who are, or have been, intimate partners or family members regardless of gender or sexuality. The abuse can encompass, but is not limited to: psychological, physical, sexual, financial and emotional.”

Despite this recognition of emotional abuse as a form of domestic abuse, it is not covered under domestic violence law. Now Theresa May is proposing a change in the law, a major step forward for victims of emotional abuse who are frightened to report their experiences or cannot obtain legal support. In ‘Legislating private relationships’, Nick Mutch argues, “This law is a way for the government to appear that it has victims’ best interests on side while continuing to deprive them of things that genuinely could help them improve their lives.” But he completely fails to grasp the true extent of the damage that emotional abuse can cause. This new law would be a significant step forward in protecting and empowering victims. Home Office statistics show that two women are killed every week in England and Wales through domestic abuse. Domestic violence often stems from, and goes hand in hand with, emotional abuse, which many victims – male and female – do not even recognise at the time. Emotional abuse can include destructive criticism, lying, humiliation, isolating someone from friends or family, monitoring their phone calls/emails/texts/letters, controlling their finances, stealing from them, withholding basic necessities, not allowing them to work or sabotaging their job, blaming and shaming, threats, and intimidation. The impact of emotional abuse can be even more devastating than physical assault, and can have much longer term effects.

Take this case study for example: one woman at a refuge in Bolton had a husband who would not allow her to have her hair cut and would monitor her whenever she left the house. If he felt she had been somewhere other than where he had approved, he would constantly question her during all hours of the night, preventing her from sleeping before work the next day. He tried to isolate her from her children, which caused constant arguments, in the course of which he would become violent. Until the physical abuse started, this woman had seen her husband’s controlling behaviour as “normal and acceptable”. She had only ever been in a relationship with him and so had nothing to compare it with.

Another woman at the refuge had escaped a partner who had not allowed her to nurture her severely autistic seven year old son. She was never allowed to show love to him, which she said was “breaking her heart”. In the refuge, she finally began to get to know her son, saying, “He makes me smile all the time.” Both these examples show the very real and extreme impact of emotional abuse. It’s rather difficult, then, to take Mutch seriously when he suggests that the occasional minor row such as the one he had with his then girlfriend could be classed as emotional abuse. In doing so he diminishes the real and frightening experiences of emotional abuse survivors.

According to the Home Office, types of behaviour that could be covered by the new law include threatening a partner with violence, cutting them off from friends or family or refusing them access to money in order to limit their freedom. (Under the current law, nonviolent coercive/controlling behaviour is covered by stalking and harassment legislation, but it does not apply to intimate relationships.) This type of behaviour far exceeds the occasional minor row Mutch describes. Mutch’s comparison of legislation designed to protect people from these forms of abuse with “the criminalization of homosexuality, or extraordinarily harsh penalties for women who commit adultery” is bizarre at best, and rather sinister at worst. Mutch also claims that, because emotional abuse is “virtually impossible to prove”, criminalising it would “lower public respect for the Justice system.” By that logic, surely we should also legalise rape, given the sub-10% attrition rate in the UK? He should also remember that anti-domestic violence law gives survivors of emotional abuse access to legal protections, even when it doesn’t result in a conviction.

Moreover, there are numerous things that we can do to help raise conviction rates, such as giving domestic abuse survivors the emotional and psychological support that they need or fighting victim-blaming tropes. Even without these other factors, a potentially low conviction rate is not an argument for keeping abuse legal. Another of Mutch’s claims deserving redress is his suggestion that, because the law could be abused, it would not be valuable. Perpetuating myths that false claims are rife or that people accused of abuse are automatically hung out to dry by the legal system is extremely damaging and not true. Mutch’s assertion that the new law “would become a tool in the abuser’s arsenal of psychological control and torment” goes against the judgement of experts who have worked with victims of emotional and physical abuse for years. This proposed law is heavily backed by numerous anti-domestic violence charities. Polly Neate, Chief Executive of Women’s Aid, said that treating emotional abuse as a crime could give victims greater confidence to speak out sooner as well as potentially boosting the conviction rate.

Neate said, “Prosecutions and convictions as a proportion of recorded domestic crime are falling. And over the last four years over 10,000 perpetrators of domestic violence have been handed only community resolutions, with many simply being asked to apologise to their victim.”

The justice system is currently heavily skewed in favour of abusers; thousands of victims suffer in silence each year. It is extraordinary that emotional abuse, a form of domestic abuse that frequently goes hand in hand with violence, has not yet been criminalised. Theresa May is right: it’s time to give victims the long-overdue legal protection and empowerment that they deserve. It’s a small start, but a start all the same.