A motion has passed to subsidise the purchase of Mooncups by members of Hertford JCR.

The motion stated, “Re-usable menstrual cups, such as the Mooncup, are better for the environment, pose fewer health risks and are cheaper for their users in the long run than tampons and pads.” It went on to note that JCR members might be put off from buying them due to their initial high fixed-cost, and that, “Subsidising the cost of menstrual cups would be a sustainable way for the JCR to support its female members and encourage members to consider the environmental consequences of other sanitary products.”

Ayla Ansari, who proposed the motion, said, “I proposed the motion in order to get people using Mooncups because I know that many people haven’t heard of them or might think they’re just a bit gross and excessively hippy but this really isn’t true.

They’re far, far more environmentally friendly – the average woman uses 11,000 pads or tampons in her lifetime which all go to landfill or are incinerated. One menstrual cup, on the other hand, can last for 10 years.”

She added, “Talking about menstruation shouldn’t be considered a social taboo, especially when at the same time women are expected to shell out money every month which does add up and there is no equivalent necessary expenditure for men which women do not buy.”

Kate Guariento, a member of the Hertford Feminists group, seconded the motion, and she explained why she had chosen to do so. She told Cherwell, “I decided to second the Mooncup motion because I think that more women should be encouraged to opt for sanitary products that are less harmful not only to the environment, but also to their bodies. We hoped that a JCR subsidy would encourage people who might otherwise be put off by the expensive upfront cost – about £20, though it’s far cheaper in the long run!”

However, the motion was not passed without controversy. Having originally requested full subsidy for any Mooncups bought within the JCR, it was eventually passed in an amended form which stated that members would be subsidised half the cost of any Mooncups bought, with an annual cap of £500 on JCR money spent on Mooncups.

Arguments raised against the motion included the point that if Mooncups were such good value for money, they should not have to be subsidised. Another concern was that JCR members may purchase Mooncups to try them out, then stop using them, thus wasting JCR money.

However, Josh Platt, Hertford JCR President, was pleased that the motion eventually passed. He said, “The motion to subsidise Mooncups was brought forward as a way for the JCR to show it support towards our female members and towards the environment.

“Originally, the proposers of the motion asked for a full reimbursement, but after a healthy debate in our meeting, everyone was agreed that a 50% subsidy, capped at a total cost of £500 for the year, was the fairest way to settle things. I’m glad that the JCR is now able to help women with the costs of purchasing a Mooncup and I am sure that the cap of £500 will not stop anyone who wants to take up this offer from doing so. I know that other JCRs have already passed motions to a similar effect, and I hope that many more will continue to champion green policies in any way that they see fit.”

The Mooncup, a silicone menstrual cup which can be used as an alternative to tampons and sanitary towels, is reusable and retails at between £15 to £20.

Only one percent of students give money on a weekly basis to people who are begging on the street, a new survey by OUSU has revealed.

The survey, part of OUSU’s On Your Doorstep campaign, asked 1192 students about their attitudes towards homeless people in Oxford.
Ninety-four per cent of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that homelessness was a big problem in Oxford.

However, the survey has revealed an alarming lack of awareness about what students should do if they see someone sleeping rough; ninety-four per cent of respondents said they were unsure or didn’t know who to contact if they saw someone who was sleeping rough.

OUSU advice currently states that students should contact the charity StreetLink if they see someone sleeping rough.

Accepting that there was a problem with student awareness, OUSU’s Community and Charity rep Emily Silcock told Cherwell that the survey “seems to show that homelessness is really something that students are concerned about, but we’re often not very sure what to do about it.

“The aim of OUSU’s ‘On Your Doorstep’ campaign is to allow students to become informed and act on these issues. We aim to ensure that every student in Oxford knows who to contact if they see someone rough sleeping.

“We are planning on making this information very obvious to next year’s freshers, as well as organising awareness events and hopefully getting exposure in the student press.”

Jesus college student, Aida Alonzo, agreed with the need for more student awareness ofhow to tackle homelessness, “I think it would be good to see information on how to help the homeless made accessible to students. From talking to peers and trying to get them involved in homeless action I get the sense that in a lot of cases the enthusiasm is there but students just don’t know how they should help. I myself remain unsure!”

The findings demonstrate an overwhelming discrepancy between reality and students’ perceptions of the causes of homelessness, with thirty-six per cent of students believing drug and alcohol addiction to be the highest factor in causing someone to be on the street. In reality, relationship breakdown was the most common cause at forty-one per cent, which only ten per cent of students assumed to be the largest factor.

Meanwhile, only two per cent of respondents thought that leaving prison was the most common cause of homelessness, when in reality it is responsible for a quarter of homeless people living on Oxford’s streets.

Former coordinator of the Homeless Action Group Amy Ertan told Cherwell that she is “not too surprised by these discrepancies on the believed causes of homelessness. The fact is homelessness is usually the result of several things going wrong, often out of the control of the person in question. Factors such as poor mental health and relationship isolation are huge contributors to the insecurity that can lead to someone sleeping rough or sleeping without stable housing.”

Sixty-five per cent of students thought that at least half of all homeless people were suffering from mental health problems, yet the real figure is closer to one in four. Similarly, sixty-nine per cent of respondents thought that at least half of all homeless people had some sort of addiction problem, while statistics from the charity Homeless Link claim that under two-fifths of homeless people have drug problems.

The survey also brought up the issue of giving money to people begging on the street. Forty-five per cent of respondents “never give money to people who are begging”, while thirty-five per cent were “unsure as to whether giving money directly to people who are begging is a good thing.”

Almost all of the services in Oxford currently support the campaign ‘Your Kindness Can Kill,’ which advises against giving money, food, or anything else to people who are on the streets. Homeless charity Broadway has said that the biggest thing that students could do to help people who are rough sleeping is to stop giving money to people who are begging.

St Hugh’s student Amy Ertan told Cherwell that while ‘Your Kindness Can Kill’ has great intentions, “there needs to be more emphasis on other ways to help… for example, buying a Big Issue from a registered seller is supporting a long-term solution that helps someone stand on their own two feet.”

Meanwhile, the survey suggested that more students are volunteering for homeless charities than regularly give money to people begging. Three per cent of students are said to volunteer at least “once a week”, while sixteen per cent volunteer less than once a month.

Students around Oxford have been wearing white ribbons this week to protest against violence against women.

Starting this Monday, the OUSU Women’s Campaign is encouraging students to wear white ribbons on their exam subfusc along with a carnation, and to post a selfie on Facebook with the caption, “Wearing this white ribbon, I pledge never to commit, condone, or remain silent about violence against women. The damage that gender-based violence can do should never be underestimated yet frequently is.”

Sarah Pine, OUSU VP for Women and one of the organisers of the campaign in Oxford, told Cherwell, “We’ve got through about 350 ribbons since Monday. Some JCR presidents have been particularly keen and have picked up lots for their finalists.”

She continued, “The feedback has been great; people seem really keen. Lots of people recognise how prevalent sexual violence is; one in four women experience sexual assault during their time at university. However, survivors can feel isolated because of the broader culture of stigma and silence around sexual violence. By wearing a ribbon, students show that they support survivors, even those who have never spoken out. The message of the white ribbon is powerful: never commit, condone or remain silent around violence against women.”

Susannah Moody, a second-year at St Anne’s supporting the campaign, explained why she is supporting the campaign, “the damage inflicted by gender-based violence often lasts long after any physical signs have faded. I’m wearing this ribbon in the hope that those who go through this know that they are not alone and that there are many out there who are working to raise awareness and are willing to listen.”

Moody’s views were echoed by Lucy McCann, an Exeter fresher who is planning to wear her ribbon during prelims, “This is an important symbolic act of solidarity on behalf of Oxford students and students elsewhere who have suffered gendered violence. “

The Oxford campaign was inspired by the ‘red tape’ protest at the University of Columbia in the US. Last week, students at Columbia wore red tape on their caps during graduation in protest against the University’s “woefully inadequate” response to sexual violence on campus.

To obtain a white ribbon, students can email Sarah Pine at [email protected]

Anna Bazley, a member of Standing Committee, has handed in her resignation due to “an irreconcilable conflict in personal loyalties and priorities.”

In her resignation letter sent to President Ben Sullivan, the Returning Officer and other members of Standing Committee, among others, Bazley said, “It is with regret and relief that I write to tender my resignation as a member of Standing Committee. Unfortunately, due to an irreconcilable conflict in personal loyalties and priorities, I am unable to continue in my role on committee.

“I’m sorry this communication comes at such a delicate time, but as many of you are aware this is a decision I have been contemplating for a while, and having made up my mind thought it best to inform committee as soon as possible, to ensure that my successor can have a smooth transition into their new role.”

Bazley continued, “I wish the committee and the Union all the best.”

Ben Sullivan, President of the Union, commented, “We are very sad to hear of Anna’s resignation. She made a great contribution to the Society while on Standing Committee and helped to organise an excellent debate earlier this term. We wish her all the best for the future.”

Leading cyber-safety activist Jennifer Perry has condemned OUSU VP for Women Sarah Pine’s campaign for speakers to boycott the Oxford Union as “intimidating” and “threatening”.

Perry’s remarks came shortly before the cancellation of her own planned Oxford Union engagement today, a panel discussion on stalking and harassment, after only one audience member showed up to the Tuesday event.

Perry was to be part of a panel including Dr. Emma Short, co-founder of the National Centre for Cyberstalking Research, Alexis Bowater, a campaigner against violence against women, and Harry Fletcher, a criminal justice expert and parliamentary campaigner. She told Cherwell that the event would be rescheduled for Michaelmas.

Yesterday, Perry publicly expressed her disappointment in the Oxford Union boycott campaign organised by Sarah Pine and Helena Dollimore. The campaign calls for invited speakers to withdraw from Union commitments due to President Ben Sullivan’s arrest and subsequent release on bail on suspicion of rape and attempted rape.

Perry told The Telegraph that she was subject to “an enormous amount of pressure” from Pine to cancel Tuesday’s panel, which Perry described as “directed at keeping primarily women safe”.

Addressing Pine directly in her statement, Perry continued, “We simply do not understand why you believe it is in the interest of the students to stop them from hearing safety messages about stalking.”

“It became apparent that [Sarah Pine’s] agenda wasn’t about keeping women safe and comfortable and coming to the talk. It was more that they wanted another speaker not attending the Union. I don’t want to be hijacked by someone else’s political campaign.”

Perry’s condemnation of the boycott campaign comes just days after prominent philosopher A.C. Grayling defended his decision to speak at the Union.

“I simply cannot, in all conscience, allow myself to act only on the basis of allegations and suspicions, or of conviction by the kangaroo court of opinion, or trial by press,” Grayling wrote in an open letter last week.

Planned speakers Tawakkol Karman, Julie Meyer, Eric Whitacre, and the Secretary General of Interpol have nevertheless all pulled out of Union events in reaction to Pine and Dollimore’s campaign for a boycott.

Responding to Perry’s denouncement of her campaign, Pine told The Telegraph, “It is regrettable that Jennifer turned down our request for an alternative venue that was bigger and wheelchair accessible which was at the same time and could have reached more people.”

“However, we have a OUSU women’s campaign harassment and stalking working group which is meeting this week and I am proud to be a part of.”

“I think Jennifer is right when she stresses the importance opening up discussions around stalking.”

Oxford Union President Ben Sullivan told Cherwell, “I am glad that Ms Perry agrees that Ms Pine’s campaign to force speakers to boycott the Union is counterproductive and unnecessary. At this point no charges have been laid against me. I feel it would undermine the Union’s core values for a President to resign because of allegations.

“This practice has precedence in the House of Commons. Last year the former Deputy Speaker Nigel Evans was arrested after similar allegations but did not step down after his arrest. I can confirm that if I am charged however, like Mr Evans, I will resign immediately.”