Monday 18th August 2025
Blog Page 1454

Interview: Albert Alla

0

Debut novelists are rarely this well-travelled. Albert Alla, who has just published his first novel Black Chalk, has lived everywhere from St Tropez to Sydney, England to France, finally settling on the Pacific Island of New Caledonia.

Yet it’s Oxford that provides the setting for his first book. Following in the footsteps of Jennifer Brown’s Hate List, Jodi Picoult’s Nineteen Minutes, and Lionel Shriver’s We Need to Talk About Kevin, the story centres on Nate, a 17-year-old who finds that his friend has committed a school shooting. The focus, however, is less on the perpetator than on the effects of the killing on Nate. I ask Alla why he chose to concentrate on the character of the friend, and not the shooter.

He tells me that a teenage shooter is relatively unintresting. “What you have with a shooter is someone who is highly bullied, and the way you would make such a book interesting is by taking an anti-moral stance; you would do something like American Psycho. To make that work you would have to aim for sympathy or empathy towards horror. In books like Ameri- can Psycho, or certain TV shows, there is an anti-hero glamour that I didn’t want. Shows like Dexter or The Wire have some horrible characters, and we develop a lot of sympathy for these characters, even though their actions are des- picable.”

Instead, Black Chalk is a book about moral ambivalence. Alla tells me that this has been a lifelong obsession. “When we were growing up, and watching a movie, my father would say ‘The contrasts are tuned in too strongly’. The standard American movie has a baddie and goodie. This concept was something that was always looked on distastefully in my household. We looked for something greyer.”

But, I argue, Dexter or The Wire are centred in moral ambivalence. You want to reject those characters’ actions, and yet you’re still interested. Alla disagrees.

“The actions in those shows are still clearly wrong. Moral ambivalence exists there because the author is willing to let you understand the characters. It’s important to understand how someone sees themselves. But it is still not morally ambivalent.” In his book, Nate must remain friends with everyone, including both the victims and perpetrator of the shooting, and there is an uneasy sense of complicity in that friendship.

For someone who has evidently had such a global existence, from writing in Paris to ‘running a small telecommunications firm on an island of two thousand people and twice as many pigs’, it is interesting that he chose Oxford as the setting for his story. Alla studied here as an undergraduate and tells me, “It’s a place that grips you and it takes time before it lets go. When I wrote the book I was still in its grip. I’m not anymore, and it’s strange – when I come back I feel like a stranger.” (The TSK where we meet, for example, was, according to Alla, formerly a QI themed cafe. The more you know.) Though he started off doing Engineering and soon switched to Economics, the only thing he enjoyed was writing. “Most teenage books are really bad, and we try to hide them. But I sweated so much over it that after Oxford, there wasn’t much else I was good at. The only thing I had was writing.”

Alla is currently based in New Caledonia, another island in the Pacific, and the setting for his next book. “It’s a captivating place because it went through an independence struggle but stayed part of France simply because there was a majority of people that wanted to remain. But this was on the wave of massive decolonisation. So now it has 40 per cent who are Caracs and favour independence, 40 per cent of Europeans who are mainly against, and the remainder who are Pacific islanders who are against inde- pendence, fearing that if that happened they would get kicked out. The place is fascinating and the dynamics are fascinating. It’s the sort of place you would imagine Graham Greene setting a novel.”

Before we meet, Alla’s publicist sent me the press release for his novel, which emphasises that its themes are ‘current’. Alla isn’t sure about this description. “When does a book about a shooting become relevant? School shootings are relevant, but so are many things. But we haven’t yet become numb about them. What’s interesting about school shootings is that, in our lives, we’ve seen them become a social phenomenon. You can be certain that angry kids are considering it as we speak. But so many things are ‘current’ – to be current is to be cheap.”

Black Chalk is published by Garne Publishing and available here

Interview: Jim Crace

0

Jim Crace’s hypnotic prose and passionately gentle political agenda has fascinated me ever since I read The Pesthouse – a vivid tale of post-apocalyptic America – when I was thirteen, and went to hear him speak afterwards at a book-signing, where I plucked up all my courage to stutter out a slightly nonsensical question.

He made my day by dedicating my copy of the novel to the girl with ‘the smartest question in Cambridge’ – I hope I don’t disappoint him six years down the line. 

 ‘It was June 1963, I was seventeen, and I guessed correctly I’d done badly in my A levels. I reckoned I could be like Jack Kerouac.’ Crace is explaining how he ended up taking what we students might nowadays call a ‘gap year’.

‘I’d wear a lumberjack shirt, smoke a lot of dope, knock out three weeks of “continuous bop prosody” and become a famous novelist before the summer was over. It didn’t happen.’ Instead, Crace returned to England, where he studied English Literature in Birmingham and ‘loved it.’

But the best-selling novels, Whitbread Awards and Man Booker shortlists were still many years away. Jim Crace has always been a stalwart socialist, and wanted to shake up the status quo. He worked for the VSO (Voluntary Services Overseas) in Sudan and became a freelance journalist which he counts as ‘more important than fiction’. I ask him to explain.

‘When I spot people reading one of my novels, I can pretty accurately predict how they vote, what newspaper they read and how they feel about red meat. They are all versions of me. So what’s the point of preaching to them? They’re already on my side. But when I was a journalist, my articles would be seen by more than a million people every Sunday. Few of them were clones of me. Good journalism can make converts.’ So what should a young activist do to make a difference? ‘Take to the streets and not to the word processor… I want that to be true even if it isn’t.’

Journalism was also ‘a lot more fun – it dangled me from a helicopter over the Atlantic; it took me running with Daley Thompson; it lost me in the desert several times; it put me in the Ritz with a Bond Girl; it had me tip-toeing through land-mines in remote Cambodia… Plus, it taught me how to make every word count.’

There would have to be a really good reason to quit, and there was – a sinister dispute with the Sunday Times. ‘In 1986 I had a long story spiked for what the gossip columns called “quasi-political reasons” by the then-editor. It concerned the Broadwater Farm riots where PC Blakelock had been murdered the year before. I dug up some uncomfortable details about any number of prejudices.

My discoveries were subsequently vindicated – but too late to save the article (and too late to block the prejudices of the editor). As it happens, the spiking coincided with the sale in America of my first book, Continent. I could afford to be principled, so I left journalism.’

 Crace’s novels retain his political convictions, albeit tacitly. Take his second book, The Gift of Stones, a political allegory for Thatcherite Britain but set in the Stone Age. I wonder if Crace’s latest novel, Harvest (shortlisted for the Man Booker and currently up for the Goldsmiths Award), is political too?

‘Yes, but subtly, hesitantly, furtively so. The message of the book is all smoke and mirrors. It’s not a placard or a slogan or a leaflet, though its subject matters – dispossession, xenophobia – would readily lead themselves to some sloganeering.’

 The riveting novel revolves around an isolated village of farmers in medieval England, forced from their land to make way for sheep. The protagonist of Harvest shares Crace’s fascination with nature – I wonder if he is similar to him in any other ways.

‘None of the characters in my novels are self-portraits. My narrator, Walter Thirsk, is an uneducated man with great sensibilities and an ability to express himself well. Critics have said such a man could not display such narrative gifts. These are the same people who say a glove maker’s son from Stratford-upon-Avon with “small Latin and less Greek” could not have written the Shakespeare plays. It’s a class judgement and it’s snobbery. I used Walter to contest that attitude.’

I ask if Crace thinks Oxford should do more to contest the state/private school imbalance. ‘Personally, I’d like every fee-paying and selective school in the country to close because no-one any longer saw any benefit in them.’ Crace was opposed to the Man Booker opening its doors to American novelists, worrying the prize would lose its Commonwealth ‘focus’. So is an institution like Oxford valuable in upholding British tradition, or archaic?

‘Oxford University is certainly archaic. The past is replayed there every day. Traditions are rehearsed and upheld. But ruling class traditions aren’t the only ones in Britain. Ask yourself the question, is an institution like Oxford University valuable in upholding immigrant tradition, or working class tradition, or Northern tradition, or Socialist tradition, or (add to the list yourself) tradition – and the answer is clearly No. That is not a condemnation of OU (or not entirely); it is merely what you see reflected if you hold up a mirror to the place.’

My final question to Crace is why he has decided Harvest will be his last novel. His answer is typical of the man who has made time to be interviewed by a persistent fresher during the drama of two major award nominations: ‘Because I’d like to be more useful – for a while, at least.’

Harvest is published by Picador and is available here

"Sexist embarrassment" condemned

0

A drinking society at St Hugh’s has offered its “most sincere apologies” for invitations it sent out inviting students to a ‘fox hunt’, which had been due to take place this evening. The letter of apology from the Black Cygnets was emailed to the JCR mailing list and addressed to Dame Angiolini, Principal of St Hugh’s College, and college students. It said that the event “will not take place this year or ever again.”

The letter was sent following an emergency JCR meeting at the college on Wednesday evening in which a motion pertaining to the condemnation of the Black Cygnets was passed by a significant show of hands. The motion mandated the JCR to issue “a formal statement of dissociation from, and condemnation of, the Black Cygnets.”

Invitations to the fox hunt were pidged to selected students earlier this week. Women taking part in even were instructed to “pass the following obstacles”, including a set drink to consume at a number of different pubs, with “huntsmen in pursuit”, in order to “evade mauling”, according to the invite.

The letter of apology acknowledged the negative reaction to the invitations by many students at the college and across the University. It stated, “Whilst the theme of the event and the language used in the invitations was clearly in poor taste and could reasonably be interpreted as aggressive, sexually or otherwise, this was not at all reflective either of the intentions of anyone involved or the actual tone of the event itself. The event was wholeheartedly intended to be humorous for all involved and not as a trivialisation of women.”

The letter continued, “Given the grave offense and disgust this year’s fox hunt invitations have caused and in recognition of the role such an event could be seen to play, though unintentionally, in the perpetuation of male privilege, rape culture and hetero-normativity, we have decided to cancel this year’s event and bring an end to this misguided tradition permanently.”

The writers of the letter also alleged, “The rendering of the event, both by the JCR and the student press, presents it as being far more sinister than it is in reality. Although conventionally the two groups in the pub crawl have generally complied with gender division, this is not enforced at the event itself, with male members of the society having run as foxes in previous years and vice versa.

“Additionally, the non-members invited are equally spread across both gender and year group, not selected from amongst first year women. Furthermore the invitation process involves consultation with our friends of both genders, and guests are invited according to whether they would enjoy the pub crawl and not on the basis of sexual attractiveness.”

A statement from the JCR said, “The JCR condemns the Black Cygnets and disassociates itself entirely from this society and its actions. The JCR supports the enquiries of St Hugh’s College to render effective the ban on the Black Cygnets and will support any JCR member who wishes to assist this process in their personal capacity.”

Carenza Harvey, the fresher who proposed the JCR motion, told Cherwell, “I definitely think that similar societies have been allowed to exist and get away with their actions for too long. It is appalling that this sort of behaviour can still take place in a university which is supposed to be a centre of learning and progression – it is this sort of conduct which perpetuates the negative stereotypes already surrounding Oxford.”

A university-wide initiative across JCRs has been proposed by some to tackle the unacceptable sexism present in some of these societies. Some JCR presidents contacted by Cherwell said that their colleges were absent of such societies. Navjeev Singh, President of St Peter’s JCR, said, “St Peter’s prides itself on being inclusive and welcoming. There is absolutely no space for misogyny in this college.” He added, “JCR presidents have been speaking to each other to pool ideas to ensure that these things are eliminated. It should not be an inevitable part of life in Oxford.”

Others emphasised the importance of the role in JCRs in abolishing unacceptable conduct at drinking events. Magdalen JCR President Amelia Ross told Cherwell, “It’s really great to see the JCR coming together to condemn the group. It’s through decisive collective action that demonstrates that these societies, and their behaviour, are seen as unacceptable by a large majority that eventually they will dwindle and disappear.”

However, mixed views were expressed on the possibility of action by OUSU to try to eliminate misogynist drinking events. Jane Cahill, one of the candidates for the OUSU presidency, was doubtful about whether the student union should intervene. She said, “These things aren’t inevitable and students shouldn’t have to put up with it. However, I don’t think the student union should be intervening in cases regarding JCRs and colleges… àJCR Presidents should work together on strategies to tackle these problems, but ultimately it is the colleges who are responsible for the actions of their students and should be disciplining people involved where necessary.”

Sarah Pine, OUSU Vice President for Women, said, “I’m sure the decision to condemn the society was a simple one. Reports of preying on young women, using language of hunting around sex, and rating women through oppressive standards of beauty is oppressive. Some of this behaviour feeds into sexual violence – women’s choices don’t fit into a framework of being ‘caught’ by men.”

She added, “We all have the capacity to act in ways that challenge misogyny. There are OUSU initiatives on sexual violence. We encourage a healthy understanding of sexual consent through the sexual consent discussion groups, which any common room can request.”

OUSU candidates in website controversy

0

The OUSU presidential election had a turbulent first week with all three main contenders involved in website controversy.

After Reclaim OUSU came under fire for an unfortunate website gaffe last week, with Nathan Akehurst’s page telling viewers that “Nathan sucks really bad”, Jane4Change has been accused of “stealing” from the website of design company Mixd. The Jane4Change website has since been taken down.

The remarkable similarity of the two sites prompted Mike Danford, the creative director of Mixd, to claim that Jane4Change had “stolen” from their website and that Will Neaverson, who designed the website, “shouldn’t have done it”. He also commented that some of the Jane4Change website was still drawing on the hosting resources of the original design, consuming some of their bandwidth.

Danford stressed that the code had been carefully adapted in a process that obviously required some skill.

Jane Cahill was quick to distance herself from the process of the website design, commenting to Cherwell, “Our team were not aware of the technicalities of website, we didn’t have a huge number of resources to put together a sophisticated software for this election. The website editor has apologised to the company involved which is right and we have taken down the design.”

Rival president candidate Alex Bartram, however, felt it cast doubts on the efficacy of Cahill as a potential president commenting, “Jane4Change haven’t been able to put a website up for their campaign on a budget of over £200 without using somebody else’s. How they’ll manage to run a Student Union and get a whole new building with an uncosted plan is entirely unclear.”

Nathan Akehurst was equally dismissive, saying, “It’s surprising that such a carefully planned political machine is capable of such a basic mistake. I would just sincerely like to express my hope their policies are more original than their website and their team name.”

Alex Bartram has also been criticised this week for his use of ‘NationBuilder’, an advanced tool for political campaigns utilised by major political parties for national elections. The tool allows users to accumulate large amounts of data in order to conduct more targeted campaigning, for example by sending specific policies to specific groups of people.

Bartram said that he was excited by using the tool for the campaign, commenting, “We think its capacity for information storage is incredibly useful even for a (relatively) small-scale campaign like the OUSU elections.

What it means is we can match up a huge amount of different people with the specific policies, areas, or interests that we’re addressing, and really target our campaign on the basis of that.”

The other, candidates, however, expressed bewilderment at using such a sophisticated piece of software for a student election.

Jane Cahill of Jane4Change commented, “We find it amusing that a candidate who claims he is not a typical student politician is using an invasive technology which the Labour party uses to stuff people’s inboxes with targeted mailings and to manipulate Facebook newsfeeds.

Firstly, it’s weird to use that in a student union election, and secondly I don’t want to see elections decided by the quality of software over the quality ideas and experience. More broadly, we wouldn’t be comfortably holding as much information on students as it required to, say, target an email on a sports policy, or an academic policy.”

Nathan Akehurst of Reclaim OUSU was also sceptical about the use of the website, commenting “I don’t think using advanced software in a student union election is necessary, and if what I’ve heard about privacy issues is correct then it is worrying. At the end of the day, nothing beats a face to face conversation about what we want out of our union, and that’s what I hope these elections will be won on.”

Bartram, however, was keen to stress that NationBuilder would not allow Team Alex to access any private information from Facebook profiles.

One Wadham student commented on the election that they were “shocked” and “confused” about how “the dark games of politics had transcended into OUSU”.

Languages in decline

0

UK universities are witnessing a startling decline in the number of students studying modern foreign languages, recent government statistics show.

The figures, compiled by UCAS, indicate an overall drop of between 12 and 14 percent in the number of students accepted to study modern foreign languages at British universities between the 2011 and 2012 admissions cycles.

The marked drop in language students coincides with an overall decline of 210,670 in the total number of students applying to university, attributed by many to the implementation of the governments new tuition fee regime, which saw fees nearly triple in many cases from £3,290 to £9,000 per year. But the overall drop in applicants represents a change of only 7.4%, as compared with a 13.4% drop in language applicants.

The latest figures illustrate the continuation of a long-standing trend. Decreasing demand for language courses has led many universities to reduce the range of languages they teach, or to shutter their language departments entirely: last month, the Guardian reported that between 1998 and 2013, the number of universities offering single honours language degrees dropped from 93 to 56 a change of 40%.

Prof. Katrin Kohl, fellow in German at Jesus College and a founder of the Oxford German Network, explained why modern language courses in the UK are particularly vulnerable: Wherever English is spoken as a native language, there is a certain problem of motivation for students when it comes to foreign languages. English is now a global lingua franca, and most English speakers can get by quite happily in other countries just speaking English. Students dont see why studying other languages might be useful.

Institutional pressures may also be having an effect on studentsdecisions not to pursue languages. In 2004, the Blair government abolished the requirement that all pupils study at least one foreign language to GCSE level, which meant fewer pupils chose to pursue languages to A-level.

Yet even those students who do study languages at A-level can face especial difficulty. It is well-known that there is a problem of severe grading when it comes to language A-levels,Kohl said. The fact is that fewer A*s are awarded in languages than in other subjects.This disparity can discourage students from pursuing modern languages, which can seen to be risky or overly difficult subject choices.

Oxford itself seems to have escaped the broader trend of decline in demand. The university has not experienced a comparable long-term drop in language applicants, but instead has seen a very minor on-average increase (1.1%) in applications to language courses between 2007 and 2012, despite a 5% drop between 2011 and 2012. This may not be cause for celebration, however. Kohl told the Guardian, Were reaching the position where language competence is a privilege of the privately educated elite, and language degrees are restricted to Russell Group Universities.

This is troubling, she says, because studying languages confers important personal and social benefits: learning another language is intellectually enjoyable, but it also gives us first-hand awareness of cultural diversity, enhances our ability to use language more generally, and benefits us cognitively in particular ways, in the same way studying music or maths does.

Anna Berger, a first-year French and Philosophy student at Magdalen, echoed these sentiments, saying she chose to study French because it offers an alternative way to see the world.Not only that, studying a language allows one to explore a breadth of different topics: In languages you try to have an overview on one culture, so [you] have the possibility to work interdisciplinarily.This gives direct access to the best ingredients to a humanistic world view: literature, art, history, philosophy,Berger said.

Kohl suggested a number of possible ways to increase interest in language study. She underlined that the problem of severe grading ought to be addressed immediately, and that dullschool syllabi should be revisited. She also suggested that the government should proactively support and invest in language teaching, which can be especially expensive, both at school and university levels. Through the Oxford German Network, Kohl seeks to promote interest in German language and culture in the local community by establishing links between the University and local schools, organisations, and businesses.

Kebab van owner Ali becomes JCR honorary member

0

In a motion passed last week, Ali, owner of the kebab van opposite St Anne’s, has been made the second honorary member of their JCR. Following in Cher’s footsteps, Ali has now been welcomed into the bosom of the St Anne’s community.

The motion, proposed by student Jonny Adams, argued that Ali’s is an essential part of St Anne’s late-night culture and that the JCR should support Ali in his honourable mission to provide St Anne’s students with high quality grub.

Mr Adams went on to say that Ali is a “beacon of all of St Anne’s values: equality, inclusivity, and greasy kebab meat. Ali would never judge you, no matter how incapacitated you are, and that’s why we all feel he’s a part of our JCR. Last week we appointed Cher as our first honorary member, and I think that everyone wanted an honorary member a little closer to our homes, and our hearts.”

Ali was overjoyed by the news, although slightly distracted due to a night-time rush of inebriated students. Once convinced that it did not mean he would have to become a student and study at St Anne’s, he did express his delight in his honorary membership status: “I am very happy and feel included. It is good that they like my food. We have a lot of students coming here.”

Serving out quality nosh for over twenty five years, Ali’s certainly is a Woodstock Road institution. As St Anne’s ex-JCR President Oscar Boyd declared, “Ali is like the best parent a student could ever ask for, providing delicious food at any hour of night and offering words of advice that few would ever ignore. Apparently he’s one miracle from being canonised but we felt he needed to be honoured for all the great work he’s done already. “

The general St Anne’s consensus does seem to be overwhelmingly pro-Ali, with one second year stating,“I bloody love Ali’s. It’s the absolute highlight of my night”.

Wadham tortoise survives fire

0

Wadham’s tortoise was caught in a blaze on Monday  after a lamp which was left on overnight to keep him warm started a fire in his enclosure.

The beloved tortoise, Archibald Manshella, who is still in his first year at Wadham, escaped unscathed after four fire engines were called out to attend the scene.

Wadham’s tortoise officer, Joseph Williamson, explained how the tortoise survived the blaze. He told Cherwell, “The UV heat lamp got too close to the wooden side of the tortoise’s enclosure and it caused a very small fire. The vivarium that the tortoise lives in is large in size and so he simply snuggled up on the other side, well away from the fire. The UV lamp caused an area of burning around 10cm in diameter.”

He noted that Archibald has recovered well from the incident. He said, “The tortoise is absolutely fine, if anything his encounter has made him more active and excitable than ever and he was promptly eating a nice bit of watercress minutes after he was taken out of the enclosure.”

He added, “No person or tortoise was hurt in this incident and the response of both the college members, staff and fire department was rapid and efficient. I would personally like to thank the Oxford Fire Department particularly for their help in the incident.”

Williamson also said, “There won’t be any formal sanctions for this incident, as far as I know, due to its accidental nature. I and the SU President, Anya Metzer, are now working with the college to make sure this doesn’t happen again and how to maximise the welfare of the tortoise in the future.”

SU president, Anya Metzer, assured that plans are being made to ensure Archibald’s future safety: “I have met with the Senior Tutor and the Tortoise Officer to discuss the incident and future course of action.

“The Tortoise Officer is looking into ordering a fire-proof vivarium but since hibernation time is nearing the tortoise will soon be moving into a fridge, which is where they are left to hibernate.”

She commented that Archibald is an important member of the JCR because, “in the event of a tied vote in the SU the tortoise gets the deciding vote. The tortoise always votes in favour of the motion due to its ‘radical desire for change’.

“Everyone is very thankful that the tortoise is OK as his welfare is paramount and he is much loved in the SU.”

More Funny

0

No ifs, no buts, the ludicrously entertaining Buttless Chaps are back to take a second hit at the Oxford comedy scene. Made up of parody extraordinaires Will Hislop, Barney Fishwick, Kieran Ahern, and Phoebe Hames, the group that brought you Some Funny in Trinity is back for a little bit more in 6th week.

Reluctant to reveal their plans in too much detail, Hislop tantalisingly assures me that it will be “a veritable smorgasbord of comedy treats.” When I asked what will be on the menu, I’m told that they’ll be serving up a wide variety of new material, peppered with some ‘familiar faces.’

One of the new faces will be Jack Martin, a professional jazz pianist, who describes his musical style as “quite Elton-John-y,” going on to cite Andrew Lloyd Webber as a major influence. This may seem at odds with the group’s light-hearted sketches, but that’s the beauty of it. Hislop explains how the growing momentum of the Buttless Chaps is drawing in such helpless auxiliaries: “The family is definitely growing. We’re drawing on a broader pool of both material and writers, including Sam Mills”.

However, Kieran reminds us that the family has also shrunk. When asked if their fifth member didn’t make the cut for their Michelin standards, Fishwick stammers that “he’s on paternity leave.” Nobly powering through such artistic difficulties, Hames assures me that the new show will be a humorous tapestry: “We’re particularly excited about the five-minute musical and we’ve even thrown in a recorder solo.”

Barney takes me through the ideas behind of the show as a whole: “It’s going to have a much more coherent structure than our last show. We’ve worked a lot on creating links between sketches, creating over-arching plot lines.” Like a pointillist painting, the audience should find itself appreciating the accumulative artistry even more by stepping back from the work. Provided we don’t step out of the theatre…

Thankfully, the group have managed to stay grounded despite being exposed to the dizzy heights of the Edinburgh Fringe this summer. Hislop calls it “a great experience and a great bonding opportunity” and Barney agrees: “Yeah, it was really interesting to watch other acts and steal their ideas.” Anyone who was in Edinburgh this summer is thus warned to prepare themselves for an overwhelming and undeniable sense of déjà vu.

This Aristotelian musing on the nature and origin of comedy leads the group to indulge in a charming moment of nostalgia. They’ve come a long way since their inception; whereas Hislop and Fishwick have been giggling with each other since before they could gurgle, they met Hames and Ahern through auditions. The power of comedy turned Ahern’s life around: “I was sleeping under a bench at the time.” Hislop smiles paternally, relating how: “When I first met Kieran, I told him how impressed I was with his unrelenting jokes, to which he replied ‘I’m always on, I’m like an Aga.’ That was when I knew I’d found something special.”

And something special, they are. Ending with a plea that the show will be “£5 well spent,” Barney divulges, “the more people laugh, the less I cry at night…” So as if you needed any more reasons to head down to the Burton Taylor this 6th week, Ahern asks suggestively, addressing the Oxford community at large, whilst slurping his Doctor Pepper: “Come on, what’s the worst that could happen?”

More Funny will be playing at 9:30 pm at the Burton Taylor Studio from Tuesday 19th to Sat 23rd Nov. Tickets are £6 (£5)

Magdalen plans library renovation

0

Magdalen College library is to undergo a renovation due to the need for an increase in the amount of space available to students.

This will result in no student being able to use the library during the time it takes for the building work to be completed, starting in July 2014.  A replacement book service will be available instead, and a replacement library provided.

An email sent out to students of the college by the Fellow Librarian, Christine Ferdinand, said, “We will need an alternative library during the 18 to 24 months it will take to complete the project. Our aim is to continue to provide a high quality library service during that time.”

The email also noted the steps that would have to be taken regarding the books currently stored in the New Library.

It said, “The New Library collection will have to be decanted and the whole building cleared during June after final examinations. While the details have yet to be finalised, we will ensure that more heavily used books will be available here at Magdalen.”

It was also stated that the intention was to provide access to the less frequently used books within 24 hours’ notice using the automated system, used by the main Bodleian Library, to request books from closed stacks.

The library was originally a single hall school designed in 1851, and was extensively redesigned in 1930 by Giles Gilbert Scott, who converted it into a library with space for 12 readers and a librarian. The college now requires room for 120 readers and additional space for storage and staff facilities

It  also requires 3,000 linear metres of book space. Half of this will be on mobile oak storage in preparation for a less book-based future.

The renovations will prove the solution to these as yet unfulfilled requirements, proposing to rework the original interior. A new L-shaped extension will also be added, which will stretch along the rear and continue at right angles to the original along the Longwall boundary, where the edge of the college grounds are marked by the 15th-century city wall.

There are also plans for new landscaping work to be done adjacent to the extension to create external seating in the quad within a ‘scented garden’. The work will be carried out by Wright & Wright Architects. The Fellow Librarian told Cherwell that college authorities were looking at options for temporary library accommodation and that no complete decision had been made yet.

She also said, “Magdalen Library staff are as pleased as anyone else that the project to renovate and expand our New Library is going ahead next July.” The Fellow Librarian has reportedly moved her office out of the New Library in order to create more space for library staff to work in. Despite this, the staff have still had to “endure cramped working conditions, share desks and computers, and take their coffee breaks on the New Library Porch (which is the main entrance to the library).”

Amelia Ross, the Magdalen College JCR President, said to Cherwell, “The New Library renovation and extension is absolutely essential to address issues that students at Magdalen have been raising with the work space for years.

“Whilst unfortunately it will inevitably affect students, we are confident that the college will do everything they can to help with both book availability and in providing an alternative workspace for the time that the work is being done, which will hopefully be as short as possible.”

The Home Bursar at Magdalen College  was unavailable for comment.

New votes against gambling JCR funds

0

Arieh Frosh, a second year Fine Art student at New College, presented a motion last Sunday to the JCR asking for a sum of £100-£300 for gambling purposes. The motion stated that Mr Frosh would pay double the amount back by the next meeting in two weeks’ time.

Initially, it was unclear whether the motion was entirely serious. However, when questioned, Mr Frosh was remarkably resolute:

“I can’t say too much about my strategy, but it definitely works. I’m so confident that I only really need around twenty pounds seed money, as then I’ll be able to keep ploughing my earnings back in- but I thought I should probably be on the safe side.”

The motion noted that, “The Michaelmas budget has decreased significantly in the first half of term. Money is good for the JCR.” It is indeed true that New College’s JCR has been low on funds due to a flurry of new sports kit requests.

In light of this, it seems that Mr Frosh’s intention was to raise money not just for himself but for the JCR, stating in the motion that, “giving Arieh some money for controlled gambling purposes would benefit the JCR as it’s [sic] money will be doubled in a short amount of time, which is worth the investment.”

The terms of the motion were:

“To give Arieh £100-£300 for gambling purposes, resulting in £300-£600 returning to the JCR in time for the next meeting. In the unlikely event that the money is lost, Arieh will pay back the loaned sum in monthly instalments over the course of his degree.”

During the short factual questions part of the policy discussion, in reply to whether he was a good gambler, Mr Frosh observed that, “I used to do scratch cards. It’s sort of up and down I suppose, but yes I’m fairly good.”

Moreover, after Mr Frosh revealed he would be primarily focussing on roulette, he admitted, “I have noticed that there aren’t really systems that work for roulette.”

Regarding the motion, JCR Treasurer Kara Verkroost remarked, “It’s all a load of testes.”

However there was considerable support for Mr Frosh’s motion. Anya Green, who seconded the motion, endorsed, “Arieh’s motion was a novel way to solve the JCR’s financial stress. I absolutely backed him to be able to win us some money.”

During the discussions, Mr Frosh requested, “Can I add an amendment that if I lose the money, I get more money to get myself out of it?” Subsequently, amidst the confusion of the somewhat unordered discussion, two more amendments were made: one to fly Mr Frosh out to Las Vegas in order to gamble there; and another to give Mr Frosh all the money in the JCR’s possession. Both of these amendments were however then withdrawn, upon Mr Frosh’s request to “unamend”.

After some considerable discussion, a move to vote was called, of which the outcome was 25-13 in opposition. Mr Frosh declined to comment on the failure of the motion. However a close friend of Mr Frosh’s commented, “it was probably for the best- he’d have been in a pickle if the motion had passed.”