Tuesday, May 20, 2025
Blog Page 1473

Review: Comedy Feeds

0

Released on the BBC3 and iPlayer websites as a series of pilot shows, the BBC Comedy Feeds are, most would agree, a worthy enterprise. The Office, the last truly great British comedy, is long gone. The Inbetweeners has finished, Peep Show is on its last legs and The Thick of It is all but dead. It’s about time there was another British comedy show worthy of the name. The shows are certainly a mixed bag, but there are four very good reasons to be hopeful for the future.

 The Failures:

Kerry – One Star

The sketch shows are only 15 minutes each, and in Kerry this proves to be very problematic. Star Kerry Howard plays four characters, and each appears three or four times, meaning not only that the set-ups are tediously predictable, but that each character manages to outstay its welcome. As they rely on the same punchlines, the sketches – for example, a perfectionist who goes on a destructive rampage at the slightest criticism – have an easily foreseeable shelf life. A series of such characters would be nigh-on tortuous.

The Committee Meeting  Two Stars

It’s filmed with a live audience, who are ostensibly members of the committee, chaired by Mr Chairman (Elis James), helped by his number two, health-and-safety conscious Rex (Chris Corcoran). The two chat, and after a while another local character or two arrives, and later a celebrity guest who they interview in character (a rather bemused Colin Baker). The atmosphere is very genial, and you could be quite content watching it for half an hour before realising that it hasn’t once inspired in you any greater reaction than a wry smile or two.

Nick Helm’s Heavy Entertainment – Two Stars

Nick Helm’s show is glorified stand-up: half an hour of mildly amusing jokes, one mildly amusing sketch, and three terrible songs. He has a winning dedication, and would doubtless win over a small comedy club, but I’m unsure why anyone thought his act would make for a good TV show.

Going Native – Two Stars

A hidden-camera show featuring Mona Yousefi, who plays three separate immigrants to the UK. Though the format works very well when it shows up British assumptions about other cultures (an elderly couple happily watch Yousefi rattle off an impressive number of euphemisms for ‘vagina’ without comment) it is spoiled by the scenes of childishly annoying people, such as playing up on community service with a clearly exasperated cleaner. Also, some of it borders on racism, particularly the “Japanese Youtube sensation”, who introduces herself to everyone with a shrill cry of “Herro prease!”.

The Successes:

The Cariad Show Three Stars

Though far from perfect, this show from Cariad Lloyd demonstrates that sketch comedy need not be a series of trudges to the same destination. The best sketches are characterised by touches of lovely originality; rival French parkour teams picnic together in playgrounds, and the impossibly sweet fantasy girl who plagues lonely men has cupcakes inexplicably falling from her hair. There is a creative silliness to the show, which suggests that a series would have many such moments.

 Fuzzbox – Three Stars

The script is disappointingly light on jokes, but Fuzzbox should be celebrated for its originality; it is set in a high school and uses puppets, with real teenagers providing the voices. This may seem unnecessarily gimmicky, but in fact adds a surprising realism to the conversations and the relationships, which feel immediately real. The only problem is the teenagers’ constant mumbling which often makes it quite difficult to follow.

Bamboo – Four Stars

Comedy duo Totally Tom (Tom Stourton and Tom Palmer) play two friends who open a nightclub, and they’re a send up of the oblivious, “Gap Yah-style” rich young man. Though the trailer describes them as “two douchebags united by a common dream”, the show works because their naïve idiocy makes them pretty lovable; they get a Buddha statue for luck because they think he’s the Prime Minister of Thailand. Their relationship drives the show, and the actors’ devotion to silly, over-the-top performances makes for a very watchable half hour.

C-Box – Four Stars

Rob Madin stars as Charlie, or “C-Bomb”, the “dubstep Da Vinci” unrecognised outside of his Sheffield suburb. Charlie is a great character; he lives with his mum, but he calls her by her first name and quickly corrects himself when he slips up in company. He’s brilliantly played, Madin giving him the perfect mix of impotence, bravado and honesty to make him instantly likeable. The stand-out moment is when, losing an argument, he fantasises about performing a dubstep hit that says exactly what he wants to say, but can’t. Charlie is a classic sitcom sap, and C-Bomb could be a sitcom with real legs.

This year’s BBC Comedy Feeds are available to watch here.

Review: The Internship

0

One Star

Screen reunions can be tricky things. Vince Vaughn should know. Last year saw the release of The Watch, a film which was, perhaps unfairly, hyped as the second coming of Vaughn’s partnership with Ben Stiller. Unfortunately, the film, with a Rotten Tomatoes rating of 16% was, to put it mildly, certainly no Dodgeball. Despite this, I held out some hope for The Internship. It sees Vaughn starring alongside the third of that erstwhile trio, Owen Wilson, for the first time since Wedding Crashers.

Unfortunately, The Internship fails to live up to even these low expectations. For starters, it appears to be not so much a film as an extended advert for Google. There are less than ten minutes devoted to introducing the main characters before they are whisked to Google’s San Francisco headquarters, the premise being that Vaughn (Billy McMahon) and Wilson (Nick Campbell), sacked from their jobs as travelling salesmen, are accepted onto the summer internship programme.

Most of the screen time is then aken up by their wide-eyed gazing at the wonders of working for the internet giant (slides! relaxation pods! free bagels!), while the backdrops seem to consist entirely of hotel-standard accommodation, and idyllic, forever-sunny grounds. There is repeated, un-mocking use of the term “Googly-ness” to describe the sought-after attribute of successful candidates, and the tasks the interns perform are the sort of thing that people at summer camps pay good money for. The praise is relentless and the effect is quite bizarre; a bit like watching a version of Charlie and the Chocolate Factory where Willy Wonka has been replaced by Mr Cadbury.

Even judged on its merits, the film is still a disappointment. Over-long, predictable, and low on laughs, it bores and frustrates in equal measure. The plot adheres to a well-worn formula. The interns are put into teams, and compete over a series of tasks with the winning team getting jobs; a premise at once too convenient to be realistic, and too dull to successfully hold interest. Nick and Billy are mocked by the other, vastly younger, candidates, and not without reason; they quickly prove to be almost entirely unfamiliar with computers (a skill which would seem to be the only necessary qualification for pursuing a career at Google).

In a shocking twist, however, they start to show these technologically-competent brats how it’s done, through pure old-fashioned hard work and chutzpah. They even show them a thing or two about partying, because the only thing that’s changed since the 80s is the clothes, daddio. There is, of course, a love story thrown in for good measure, which sees Nick attempting to woo a character so woefully under-developed I had to look up her name (Dana, played by Rose Byrne).

What grates most of all isn’t the fact that the film is so predictable, but that it goes through the motions of the story so lazily. The scenes whip by at a fair rate of knots, with very little energy expended on establishing either character or motive. For example, a section in which Billy drops out, gets another job, is hunted down by Nick and talked round to coming back plays out over less than five minutes of screen time. The film does this constantly, rushing you from one significant moment to the next without bothering to set the scene or provide more than a hint of motivation. The result is a rushed, unengaging end product, and it only adds to the sense that the entire thing is just a vehicle allowing Google to advertise on the silver screen.

This is a great shame in a way, because Wilson and Vaughn clearly have something still to offer as a partnership. Their presence is welcome in every scene, their interplay warm and easy, even producing some moments of surprising emotional import. They can’t, however, triumph over a script which stifles any jokes with its relentless pace, refuses to develop characters beyond a brief introduction, and, unforgivably, shows a quite astonishing deference to Google.

The Internship feels like the result of Sergey Brin threatening to kill Ben Stiller unless someone makes him a 90-minute recruitment video in two weeks. Which would probably make for a far better film; or at least one that didn’t feel quite so much like selling out.

The Internship is showing at Vue Cinema Oxford on 17th July and in Odeon Cinema Oxford until 18th July.

Malala Yousafzai: 16-year-old takes on the Taliban

0

Roughly nine months ago, I wrote a piece about the attempted murder of Pakistani schoolgirl Malala Yousafzai. She was shot at on her way to school by Taliban militants because of her campaign for girls’ education and was subsequently flown to Britain for emergency surgery and rehabilitation. Despite her undisputed bravery and dedicated fight for social justice, Malala’s future was uncertain. Unable to return to Pakistan for fear of a repeated attack but unlikely to give up her battle, the question remained – could Malala change a nation?

Yesterday, on her 16th birthday, Malala gave a speech at the United Nations that firmly answered that question. “The terrorists thought that they would change my aims and stop my ambitions,” she said, “but nothing changed in my life, except this: weakness, fear and hopelessness died. Strength, power and courage was born.” Less than a year after undergoing brain surgery, relocating to the United Kingdom and dealing with the repercussions of an assassination attempt, Malala stood amongst world leaders and her peers to let them know that her campaign was not over, and that just as before, education is her chief concern. “One child, one teacher, one pen and one book can change the world. Education is the only solution. Education first.”

Schools in Pakistan continue to exist in peril; establishments all over the country are under constant pressure from the Taliban – the threat of violence then discourages parents from sending their children to school, which perpetuates the association of education with fear. Just under a month ago in Quetta, 14 girls were killed by a bus explosion on their way to university, with militants then laying siege to the hospital that the wounded were being treated in. Though Malala has become the face of Pakistani female education rights, it is clear now that her story is one of many incidents of terror and murder throughout the country. The culture of fear is so strong that it has even forced some members of Malala’s own community to distance themselves from the girl, out of concern that their children will suffer from similar attacks. However, Malala herself aspires to be the voice for those who do not have one, and it appears that no amount of adversity or threat will change that.

In her address at the UN, Malala focused not only on education in Pakistan, but the provision and implementation of educational policy worldwide. A Unesco and Save the Children study released to coincide with the speech shows that 57 million children are currently out of school, and that attempts to rectify this incredible number have come to a “virtual standstill.” Unsurprisingly, half of the primary school aged children out of school live in conflict affected countries. This correlation was noted by Malala in her speech, as she stated, “We are really tired of these wars.” The simple collective pronoun spoke for every child forced to grow up in a war zone, every girl denied rights because of her gender, and every child facing hundreds of different wars on a daily basis. This wasn’t just a speech about free education for all, but rather a message to all world leaders – strategic policies must change if we are ever to protect children against violence and conflict, let alone offer them the education they are entitled to.

The battle for a basic right to education is a simple wish made daunting by the prospect of cultural, financial and political opposition. Despite this, Malala’s petition to UN Secretary General Ban-Ki Moon asks that “the United Nations General Assembly fund new teachers, schools, books and recommit to getting every girl and boy in school by December 2015.” It’s an ambitious goal – 44% of the uneducated children in conflict zones are from sub-Saharan Africa, and 14% are from the Arab states. If the recent incidents in Egypt, Libya and Syria, and the ongoing conflict in the Middle East are anything to go by, Malala and her supporters will be facing an uphill struggle. In addition to the political issues, there is also the cultural opposition which is arguably far more difficult to remedy. Practices such as early-marriage and frequent gender violence are some of the key preventatives to women receiving an education – it is estimated that women represent two thirds of the 775 million illiterates in the world.

These numbers are intimidating, the task seemingly impossible, but at the helm of the campaign we have a 16 year old girl whose experiences speak of both intimidation and impossibility. This is just the beginning of one of the most important worldwide campaigns at present. In my first article on Malala, I questioned whether the attack would “spur her on”, or whether it would convince her of the danger in her task. The following words taken from her speech are perhaps the only way to answer that question: “The Taliban thought the bullet would silence us, but they failed.”

Gift Cannon: “Closed For Business — Sorry!”

0

Plenty of people have ideas for businesses, but few have the guts to start one from scratch. Jordan Schlipf launched Gift Cannon in October last year, firing thousands of free pints around Oxford to promote a novel way to send physical gifts over the web.

However in just seven months the company ceased trading, having exhausted its £50,000 of start-up funding. It became one of thousands of now forgotten start-ups that might have made it to the mainstream, but did not.

Gift Cannon was an instant voucher service for mobiles that let you send and redeem treats at local shops. A doting parent for example could buy an ice cream, and make it instantly available to their offspring at G&Ds. Over 900 people tried the system, heavily promoted on launch, to prove the technology worked well, and over two dozen shops signed up in Oxford, the guinea pig town.

Every step in the chain was profitable to some extent, and many cafés put up free treats like cakes, in the knowledge that customers usually bought other things too. Gift Cannon negotiated discounts meaning that a gift sometimes ended up cheaper online than if bought in-store.

Rage against the machine (code)

According to its co-founder, the project was scuppered mainly due to a dispute with two developers in Germany, who drifted away from the project just when funding had been secured. It left the other directors facing a tough decision in April this year: either to access a guaranteed £200,000 further investment, and commit the company to rapid expansion, or to kill their own creation. They chose the latter.

On a personal recommendation, Gift Cannon’s core technology was developed in Berlin by two techies. They promised to come to London to join Gift Cannon’s team full time, but in the event after funding was delayed “a highly personal fight” ensued. Jordan and co-founder Henry were left with a half-finished system, unable to track if customers were spending enough to make the business sustainable in the long-term.

“If this number isn’t actually what we think it is, then the business model isn’t working,” were Jordan’s thoughts. He admits that the lack of hard evidence on their profitability shook even his own confidence.

Struggling for cash was a perennial issue. “(We were) structurally stupid,” says Jordan, with too many shareholders to keep happy. Having to “tranche” 80% of the money, and make do with only 20% of what was required initially, was also deeply unhelpful, but grimly unavoidable for Gift Cannon.

“(It got to the point where) if we didn’t manage to close the (funding) round before we ran out of money, we’d have to have got a real job.”

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG%%7936%%[/mm-hide-text]
Henry (left) and Jordan (right) give away an iPad  Source: Gift Cannon

Free, as in ‘free beer’

Despite the impression left on many Oxford students that Gift Cannon was profligate with its freebies, the firm was more thoughful than at first glance. The cost of an iPad giveaway and £3000 of promotional spending was dwarfed by the costs of paying developers for work that didn’t meet expectations. Practically half the budget went to Berlin, to little effect in later stages.

Gift Cannon’s intentions were enormously ambitious from the start. Along with several direct clones to compete with, the app was involved in a land-grab to become the accepted platform for gift sending. As PayPal and VISA can attest, handling money on a large scale can be very profitable indeed for those that become established.

Particularly worrying for Jordan and Henry was an announcement only weeks after their funding that Facebook were launching a service of their own.

“Suddenly you’re in a space going head-to-head with Facebook, a $100bn company… I think they’re going to win.”

At a fancy press launch in New York, while Jordan and Henry were still funding Gift Cannon from their personal savings, Mark Zuckerburg announced that online gifting would become a key revenue stream for Facebook, and that with its scale it could potentially leapfrog the early innovators.

Meanwhile back in Oxford, chain stores refused to participate, while the firms controlling cash registers were not interested in integrating gifting onto their payment terminals. Intermittent Internet access complicated the clearing system for vouchers, and a bad taste from Groupon, who “kicked (independent retailers) in the nuts,” made it difficult to find the ear of some small businesses. That Gift Cannon made the progress it did seems more impressive with all these considered.

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%7937%%[/mm-hide-text]
Jordan Schlipf, ex-Oxford student and entrepreneur (30)

Onwards and upwards

Far from being downbeat after seeing his company dissolve so quickly, Jordan Schlipf says he has learnt much from the collapse. He is now entrepreneur in residence at #1seed in London, helping other businesses find their funding. The £50,000 loss from Gift Cannon is peanuts in the risky world of start-ups, and will soon be forgiven.

Despite a clear failure this time he believes the experience puts him in a good position to try again, with a new idea, older and wiser.

Jordan Schlipf (30) studied Engineering Science at St Peter’s College. He conceived of Gift Cannon with a business partner in late-2011 and launched it first in London, then in Oxford, before it closed in April this year. He is now entrepreneur in residence at investment house #1seed in London.

Review: Magna Carta Holy Grail

0

★★★☆☆

Three Stars

On ‘Nickels and Dimes’, a lyrical consideration of his own lasting commitments to the scene and his fans which closes Magna Carta Holy Grail, Jay-Z announces that “I’d die for my niggas”. Kanye West drops the exact same line on Yeezus. This bar is startling, even amusing, in its hollowness; as per the mission statement of 2011’s Watch the Throne collaboration, neither have any opposition worth speaking of that would ever put their positions at such risk. On ‘Crown’ Jigga notes that “best friends become your enemies”, but nowadays this transition is reversed. His old rival Nas now has guest spots on his records, and the only shots he sees taken are on the basket-ball court with Obama or administrated during a guest appearance at the the local children’s hospital.

The difference between Carter and West is that while any (admittedly reasonable) objections to Yeezus relate to certain memorable, racially problematic lines studding Kanye’s work, Magna Carta sags under the weight of volumes of forgettable material. Lack of adversity is killing Jay-Z artistically, and his work here suffers accordingly.

Collaborations with Rick Ross and Frank Ocean are both uninspired; in fact, minus the fleetingly fun ‘BBC’, the entire back straight of this album is pretty disposable. When the absence of risk and danger becomes painfully noticeable, Jay simply resorts to inventing it, but ‘Part II (On the Run)’, his duet with Beyonce about an imaginary, Badlands-esque flight from the law, also ends up striking a fairly false note given their status as one of the most visible celebrity couples in history.

Magna Carta Holy Grail doesn’t even properly sustain Jay-Z’s self-mythologisation as the disdainful father of hip-hop, rising above trends and transient culture. Sure, cheap gags like “When I was talkin’ Instagram / Last thing you wanted was your picture snapped” on the enjoyable “Somewhere in America” work in and of themselves. However, the distance Carter wants to suggest between himself and these fads with the lines is given the lie by the straight-faced delivery of lines such as “might crash your internet / And I ain’t even into that”, as if this record wasn’t released via a mobile app.

Jay-Z raps “I don’t pop molly / I rock Tom Ford”, suggesting that the currents moving through underground hip-hop are no longer relevant to him. However, replacing a fashionable drug with a symbol of wealth only serves to suggest artistic irrelevance on his part, and not the other way around.

With Magna Carta Holy Grail, Jay-Z wants you to believe that he has crafted an essential, lasting document, but is seemingly unaware of the irony inherent in releasing such an LP as the first primarily digital, corporate app-album. Here, as in many places, it feels like the metaphor he strives for is wholly unsustainable.

Download: Yeezus

Review: Blissfields Festival

★★★★☆
Four Stars

It might be a truism, but sometimes we need reminding that there’s more to the British festival season than the Big G. Take Blissfields; with a capacity of 3500 it’s literally a hundred times smaller than Glasto. A moderately stellar line-up featuring Mystery Jets, Bastille, Fenech Soler, Theme Park and The Staves might initially appear to venture into dubious Radio 1 territory. However, this shouldn’t detract from the fact that as far as British festivals go, Blissfields is the real McCoy, the cat’s pyjamas, the bee’s knees — take your pick.

It all took place on a blisteringly sun-drenched Winchester farm from the 5th to the 7th of July. The weekend’s highlight was London synth-dance four-piece Post War Years, although a clash with Mystery Jets meant their set in the Bradley Bubble on Friday was unfortunately sparse in spectators.

In a very different vein, other than headliners Bastille’s crowd-pleasing set culminating in a riot of drum-thumping and fireworks on the main stage, Saturday presented some strong folky offerings. The ‘Hard Acoustic Café’, replete with armchairs and woollen blankets, showcased a soul-purifying set from L.A. Salami (so chilled some of the audience were comatose), rousing South London ska-gypsy folk group Gorgeous George, and a typically hilarious and irreverent set from Beans on Toast. Part Billy Bragg, part Frank Turner and part Del Boy, Beans on Toast reeled out versions of songs about hating war, loving MDMA and being rejected from (but subsequently booked by) Glastonbury.

DJ sets in the Bradley Bubble from Bondax, the Artful Dodger and The D.O.T kept the atmosphere buzzing into the early hours across the weekend. It must be said, the much hyped Blisscoteque (it’s like, a disco-on-a-bus?!) complete with disco ball didn’t really live up to expectations, not helped by a downwards slope to the dancefloor and the fact that security didn’t take kindly to attempts to board the bus. 

While most catch-all festivals aim to market themselves as ‘family friendly’ Blissfields did indeed attract most age demographics. Half-naked, hyperactive and unsteady on their feet, swarms of prepubescent teenagers happily rubbed shoulders with a sizeable cohort of infants and the grey-haired; the festival even held its first marriage ceremony on Saturday.

Blissfields might be too small, too cutesy and too gentle for some, but one really shouldn’t underestimate the value of ambling from the main stage to one’s tent in under two minutes, nor dismiss the importance of the portaloo queues never exceeding ten minutes. (And the press tent had free beer.)

Super Earlybird tickets for Blissfields 2014 are available here.

Oxford MP opposes unpaid internships

0

Smith affirmed his support for the Intern Aware campaign in a letter to Brasenose JCR, which states, “The consequences for social mobility of allowing unpaid internships to continue as a normal or quasi-normal part of career development are obvious.”

In the letter, Smith also said that he had raised the issue with the government in the past, and that he had written to the Chief Executive of HM Revenue & Customs and the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills for a second time, asking them to take action on the matter.

Brasenose JCR mandated its President, James Blythe, to write to Andrew Smith at the beginning of Trinity term. The letter asked the MP to back the campaign by Intern Aware.

It stated, “Unpaid internships are damaging to both young people and society as a whole. They exclude those who cannot afford to work for free and entrench regional and class inequalities.

“We would like to see you supporting young people by taking a stand on this important issue.”

In his reply, Andrew Smith wrote, “I strongly share your concerns, and am one of the Parliamentary supporters of the Intern Aware campaign. The issues you raise are ones I have pressed with the government.”

Smith’s reply was well received by Brasenose JCR. Blythe told Cherwell, “I am delighted by Andrew Smith’s prompt and positive response to the JCR’s letter and by his support for the Intern Aware campaign. It is fantastic that Brasenose students have an MP who is on their side on this issue.”

Blythe also condemned unpaid internships as “a major problem for lots of students, and a substantial barrier to social mobility in general.”

Intern Aware campaigns “for interns to be paid at least the national minimum wage”, and considers unpaid internships to “exclude those who can’t afford to work for free.” A poll carried out for the organisation found that 84% of over-35s believed that young family members were unable to afford to take up an unpaid internship.

Intern Aware works with lawyers to win back wages denied to interns. According to Intern Aware’s website, “most interns who are working are entitled to be paid at least the national minimum wage.” It goes on to say, “every time an intern has taken their employer to court for not being paid the minimum wage, they have won.”

One Hertford Geographer told Cherwell, “I for one am glad to hear that an MP has taken this action on behalf of Oxford students. It is good to know that we still have some voices in Parliament, willing to respond to our concerns.”

Review: The Complete Works of William Shakespeare (Abridged)

0

★★★☆☆

Three Stars

Evidently, the three-man cast of The Complete Works of William Shakespeare Abridged are exceptionally comfortable and well-rehearsed in their roles. However, this self-assurance and familiarity with the script is at once the play’s strength and its greatest weakness.

Gags were delivered with all the slickness you would expect from a company playing the final night of a three-month tour. However, the show now moves to a four-week residency at the Leicester Square Theatre, and the cast may well find London audiences less forgiving than the merrily shit-faced farmers, rambunctious school-children and affable pensioners who made up the audience for this performance in the grounds of Ludlow Castle in Shropshire. 

The knockabout slapstick humour of the script would benefit from a little less fluency and assurance, and a cast more willing to think on their feet. When I saw the riotous One Man, Two Guvnors over Easter, the lead role was taken by an understudy. He therefore approached the performance determined to wring every ounce of physical comedy out of the role, holding nothing back as he bounced around the stage like a madcap jester in a mustard-checked suit. It is this exuberance which was missing here from the performance of road-weary actors arguably stifled by their familiarity with the script.

Personally, though, I have an almost endless capacity to be amused by people falling over — and there were also moments of genuine wit amongst the pratfalls and funny walks. An opening monologue where a haplessly confused academic accidentally conflated Shakespeare’s biography with that of Hitler as he frantically shuffled his cue-cards worked well, as did the combination of all of Shakespeare’s comedies into a single scene full of frantic cliché. (“Enter stage left a heavy-handed metaphor for the colonial experience, pursued by two cross-dressing identical twins and a Jewish stereotype”.)

Utterly predictable pop-cultural references added nothing to this ‘revised’ version of the RSC’s original. Wikipedia is a little unreliable! Young people these days like Facebook! Justin Bieber’s fame is perhaps disproportional to his abilities! The show could have done without these moments of groundbreaking observational humour. Likewise, opportunities for audience interaction passed by as they have done in a thousand amateur pantomimes. A less formulaic and more laidback approach to this over-long section of the show would allow for the evident natural improvisational wit of the performers to shine through.

The much-vaunted idea that anyone can understand Shakespeare if it is well-performed is completely fallacious, and this show must be commended for its attempts to bring his work to audiences which would otherwise run a mile from Titus Andronicus or The Two Noble Kinsmen. A moment where one of the cast realises the true power of the Bard’s work as he delivers the ‘what a piece of work is a man’ speech from Hamlet genuinely reminded me of the beauty and clarity of the playwright’s best work.

In places, the script is very funny, and the actors’ physical humour keeps the audience ticking over well enough through lean patches. There is a sense, though, that they are going through the motions at the end of an arduous tour, and it is a shame their comedic talents are not given more room to breathe. Ultimately, this production is too professional for its own good.

The Complete Works of Shakespeare (Abridged, Revised) will be performed at the Leicester Square Theatre, London from 16th July to 11th August. Tickets can be bought from directly from the theatre, here.

Twin girls released from hostage situation

0

The girls had been involved in the situation since 3.40 BST this morning, when armed police were called to deal with a “domestic related incident”.

Although thought to be armed, the father, 38, made no threat to the girls. He has been in regular communication with police and one of the girls was released at 09.45. The second girl was released shortly before noon.

The man’s motive for holding the twins is unclear. He has made no demands and didn’t ask for anything in return for his daughters’ release, although he is thought to be estranged from the girls’ mother. He is not believed to be a threat to the public.

He remains inside the flat on Morton Avenue. He does not own the property. A cordon has been put in place around the building, and Thames Valley Police have closed Morton Avenue to “allow police operations to safely take place”. However, residents are assured that the situation is under control.

Up to fifty police officers are involved in the situation, some of them armed.

Superintendant Christian Blunt, who is involved with the police operation, said, “I’d like to provide reassurance to the public that we have this fully in hand, we have the area contained and we have firearms officers that are deployed and are currently dealing with this incident.”

A statement from Kidlington Neighbourhood Policing Team said: “This is a contained incident and neighbourhood officers will be carrying out patrols speaking to residents.”

Les Holstead, local resident, informed the BBC that Morton Avenue was normally a quiet and peaceful area, but that police had told residents to stay indoors for their own safety, due to the fact that arms are involved.

Motorists are strongly advised to avoid roads surrounding Morton Avenue as there will be little or no access until the situation is resolved.

 

The Ultimate Tennis Style Icons

0

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%7916%%[/mm-hide-text]

Jean René  Lacoste, 1928 – Creator of the piqué polo shirt, Lacoste was the first tennis player to compete in short-sleeved knit shirts instead of the dress shirts that were seen as traditional tennis attire. The French tennis player earned his nickname “The Crocodile” as a result of his tenacious playing style: this nickname was to inspire the logo that is now recognized around the world as the Lacoste sports brand.

  

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%7917%%[/mm-hide-text]

Fred Perry, 1936 – Like Lacoste, Perry was a top tennis champion who contributed to the transformation of traditional tennis clothing. Whilst competing at Wimbledon in the 1930s, Perry would wrap medical gauze around his wrist so he could easily wipe the sweat from his brow during play. This was later developed into the sweatband, an innovation Perry’s company mass produced alongside piqué polo shirts similar to Lacoste’s.

   

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%7918%%[/mm-hide-text]

ALICE MARBLE AND KAY STAMMERS, 1938 – with Marble working her oversized box coat, and Stammers in her culotte-style shorts and neat preppy blazer, these two American tennis pros sure new how to make an entrance at Wimbledon.

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%7919%%[/mm-hide-text]

LEA PERICOLI, 1965 – Pericoli often collaborated with Teddy Tinling, a sought after designer who revolutionized female tennis apparel in the ’50s and ’60s. The success of her 1964 Tinling fur-trimmed tennis dress generated so much buzz, subsequent tennis outfits were kept top-secret right up until the start of each match. Above she is shown in her Tinling rose trimmed dress.

  

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%7920%%[/mm-hide-text]

MARIA BUENO, 1966 – three-time Wimbledon champion, Bueno was also a fan of Tinling’s designs. Here she rocks a futuristic flared tennis dress with PVC detailing at the midriff and hem.

  

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%7921%%[/mm-hide-text]

GURTRUDE “GUSSIE” MORAN, 1950 – Not everyone was crazy for Teddy Tinling though. In 1949 Moran was the target of much disapproval from the All England Lawn Lawn Tennis and Croquet Club after wearing a Tinling creation so short, her frilly knickers could be seen as she played. Ever since, she chose to wear fashionable shorts beneath her skirt instead, such as her leopard print pair pictured above.

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%7922%%[/mm-hide-text]

BILLIE JEAN KING, 1967 – As a six-time Wimbledon women’s singles champion, King had a reputation for being fierce on court. But that didn’t stop her from bringing style to her games. Her preppy Lacoste twin sets were always given an edge by her fashionable frames, as shown by her miu miu style cat-eye glasses above.

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%7923%%[/mm-hide-text]

CHRIS EVERT, 1974 – Evert was well known for her cute tennis dresses that matched her American sweetheart persona. Even in 1976, when she opted for plain tennis whites whilst playing at Wimbledon, she gave her look a twist with her frilly pink panties that could be seen poking out from beneath her skirt.

  

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%7924%%[/mm-hide-text]

MARIA SHARAPOVA, 2008 – If any player today can be labeled as fashion conscious as her predecessors, it’s Sharapova. In 2006, she collaborated with Nike to create her own Audrey Hepburn-inspired LBD to wear during night matches. Above she is pictured in her Nike Wimbledon tuxedo that she wore in 2008 with a pair of £2,500 diamond and platinum earrings.

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%7925%%[/mm-hide-text]

Laura Robson, 2013 – Robson was the 19-year old newbie who stole the hearts of the British nation this tournament. Kitted out in Stella McCartney for Adidas, she sported the latest in tennis fashion wearing pieces from McCartney’s debut tennis line.