Blog Page 1475

Most graduates to be repaying debt in their 50s

0

A majority of students will be repaying their student loans in their 50s, and nearly three-quarters may never earn enough to pay their entire debt off, according to a new study commissioned by the Sutton Trust.

The study, entitled ‘Payback Time?’ was conducted by the Institute for Fiscal Studies and published yesterday. It found that only 5% of graduates will have cleared their student debt by age 40, and that 73% will not be able to repay their debt by the end of the 30-year repayment period.

It found that because many more graduates will still be paying off their student loan in their 40s and 50s, they will be subject to far higher yearly repayments. That is, under the new system, between the ages of 22 and 30, graduates will pay on average £198 less per year as compared to the old system, but £1087 more per year between the ages of 41 and 51 (2014 prices).

Allowing for inflation and anticipated earnings growth, the report shows that under the post-2012 system graduates will on average pay an additional £14,510. In cash terms, the average graduate will repay more than twice what they would under the prior system.

Conor Ryan, Director of Research at the Sutton Trust, said, “There has been a lot said about the lower repayments that graduates make in their twenties under the new loan system, but very little about the fact that many graduates will face significant repayments through their forties, whereas many would previously have repaid their loans by then”.

He continued, “The new system will benefit graduates who earn very little in their lifetime. But for many professionals, such as teachers, this will mean having to find up to £2,500 extra a year to service loans at a time when their children are still at school and family and mortgage costs are at their most pressing. With recent revelations about the proportion of loans unlikely to be repaid, it seems middle income earners pay back a lot more but the Exchequer gains little in return. We believe that the Government needs to look again at fees, loans and teaching grants to get a fairer balance”.

Claire Crawford, of the University of Warwick, who co-authored the study, said, “The new higher education finance system will leave graduates with much more debt than before. But the effects of the changes will be quite different for different people and at different parts of their lives. Graduates who do less well in the labour market will actually end up paying back less than before, while middle and high earners will pay back much more”.

She continued, “In that sense, the system is more progressive and looks in many ways rather like a graduate tax. The size of the repayment threshold also means that graduates will generally pay back less during their twenties but much more later in their careers, especially when they are in their forties. Remarkably, almost three-quarters will have some debt written off 30 years after graduating”.

Review: SOHN – Tremors

0

★★★☆☆
Three Stars

SOHN – real name Christopher Taylor – is a British musician, but his work is immersed in the traditions and atmosphere of his home in Vienna. His debut album Tremors draws influences from the burgeoning electronic scene in the city while also drawing inspiration from British and American artists. First and foremost, he’s from the James Blake school of electronic crooning, but influences from Frank Ocean and The Weeknd are evident in his soulful musings.

Initial tracks ‘Oscillate’ and ‘Warnings’, released back in August 2012, were impressive, filled with an emotional and a musical maturity that announced SOHN as a future big-game player. Both these tracks are, disappointingly, missing from Tremors. Last year’s ‘Bloodflows’, SOHN’s first release on 4AD, raised him to a whole new level. Where previously the electro had carried his singing, lyrical proficiency now reared its head. Naturally, this huge single couldn’t stay off his debut album, but unfortunately it feels somewhat isolated.

No other track on Tremors has the same lyrical depth, nor is any other track as deftly and subtly put together. One gets the feeling that, overcome by his own brilliance with ‘Bloodflows’, SOHN decided that anything else he did would turn out equally well. But the standard has dropped. Lead single ‘Artifice’ has some excitingly energetic beats, but all of SOHN’s beauty was in his subtlety, and it’s difficult to be subtle when you’re belting out “somebody better let me know my name/before I give myself away” (as cheesy a chorus as you will find anywhere this year) over a made-for-club electro riff. In fact, ‘Artifice’ perfectly exemplifies the main problem with this album. Interesting musical threads are weaved together to form a  coherent and intriguing pattern; the tapestry becomes slightly more complex as the vocals are introduced… and then the H&M-advert-hook ruins everything. And when SOHN does slow down on ‘Paralysed’, he’s forgotten that he’s an electro artist and makes do with a plodding piano accompaniment.

Even the wonderful voice distortion on ‘Bloodflows’ and ‘Oscillate’, which had Taylor’s vocals blend into the sound of a repeating synth in a confusing and wonderful way, is overused to the point of exhaustion. This is not to say that the album is a complete disaster. Most of the tracks have something interesting about them. SOHN’s use of digital effects and distortion is still excellent, and Tremors might even make a fine instrumental album. ‘Lessons’ and ‘Bloodflows’ are still great, and title track ‘Tremors’ makes an impressive ending to the album, epic but understated. However, the lack of imagination in the lyrics and the incredible overkill of Taylor’s ‘haunting’ tone makes for a disappointing overall effect, which is a real pity considering the quality of his early work.

Review: The Quiet Ones

0

★☆☆☆☆
One Star

The words “Based on a True Story” have often prefixed movies to great effect. In many ways, the awareness of historical counterparts encourages directors and viewers alike to consider not only what happened but to interrogate the how and why behind the narrative, introducing a level of social psychology which made movies like Zodiac, Snowtown and The Imposter so genuinely unsettling. Unfortunately, as in the case of the The Quiet Ones, it seems that the ‘this actually happened’ marketing strategy is increasingly being used to justify lazy film-making.

The movie follows a physics professor Joseph Coupland (Jarred Harris) in 1974 who assembles a team of three students to channel the energy of a poltergeist which seems to be possessing a young girl. The film’s opening sequences at Oxford University are relatively intriguing, with Coupland espousing his theories to sceptical students in lectures before his funds are cut off entirely by the university administration. Harris’ performance begins to touch on a kind of scholarly neurosis and academic hysteria which would make for an interesting playing-field in this genre but, alas, the production company evidently ran out of money to film in Oxford and so our intrepid foursome relocate their supernatural experiments to – that’ right – an abandoned house in the country.

1974 is the same year The Texas Chainsaw Massacre was released. The characters clearly didn’t make an effort to see it, otherwise they’d have thought twice about making camp in an old homestead.

And thus we have the set-up: a creepy child, playing with a creepy doll, in a creepy building – all being caught on camera by main character Brian (Sam Claflin) much of which is relayed to the audience as grainy, hand-held 8mm footage. The extent to which these same plots are recycled nowadays is infuriating, and it comes as a relief for movie-goers when surprisingly original horror movies like last year’s In Fear (A home invasion film but in a car and in real time) grace our screens.

Admittedly however, there is a voracious appetite for these films which shouldn’t necessarily be scorned. The issue with The Quiet Ones, then, doesn’t lie with unoriginality per se but with the general mind-numbing awfulness of its execution. Films like Insidious, The Woman in Black and The Conjuring were very predictable, exploiting obvious horror movie tropes at every possible turn, yet the scripts were fleshed out to be ultimately quite engaging stories. Here, the dialogue is purely expository, and the lacklustre visuals fail to be disguised under the façade of ‘found footage’.

Claflin is a one-note charisma vacuum, Kristina (Erin Richards) is the token beautiful blonde given nothing to say but placed centre stage for pubescent 15 year olds to gawp at, and even Harris (a reliably brilliant actor) struggles to make anything substantial out of his pantomime ‘mad scientist’ role. The only actor I found in any way engaging was Rory Fleck-Byrne, in that he was head-thumpingly annoying. Personally speaking, I couldn’t wait for him to be killed off by a demonic poltergeist. 

The audience I was with seemed collectively irritated. People were checking their phones and, at other moments, there were inappropriate howls of laughter, as when Kristina reaches the end of her tether with the supernatural occurrences and vows to return to Oxford, exclaiming (with no hint of irony) “We’ve already missed loads of lectures!” Every jump could be anticipated by the routine sound design (Quiet -> Silence -> 1, 2, 3 -> BANG), and the repetitive tense/reliefs induced for the viewer felt less like scares and more like an abdominal workout.

As the screening ended, chatter resumed, and the person sat behind me asked her partner about their evening’s dining options. Indeed, not one person seemed to be talking about the movie – as if The Quiet Ones had rudely interrupted their previous conversation. The film made me long for a viewing experience like last year’s Stoker – a head-scratching horror film made chilling not through artificial loud bangs but through aesthetically arresting cinematography and tantalising lead performances.

It continues to baffle me how commercially successful films like The Quiet Ones are. I suppose it’s largely due to how cheaply they can be made. But considering the inflated price of cinema tickets, I’d recommend going to see a movie where the film-maker has put in slightly more effort, and not explained away a poorly conceived narrative by ostentatiously publicising the fact it is “a true story.”

Which it’s not. Obviously.

Review: The Unknown Known

0

★★★★★
Five Stars

As interview subjects go, Donald Rumsfeld is a pretty big fish. Holder of the dubious honour of having been both the youngest and oldest Defence Secretary in US history, he has presided over many of the decisions that have shaped our political landscape, perhaps most significantly the Iraq war.

The director, Errol Morris, is also a pretty big deal. His documentary ‘The Thin Blue Line’ is often called the greatest documentary of all time. About two suspects in a murder case, it famously ends with a shot of a Dictaphone playing what amounts to a confession, which Morris had managed to coax out of the guilty party 10 years after the other suspect was sentenced to life imprisonment. It is the only film in history to have altered the course of justice, resulting in the innocent man being freed.

Many came to “The Unknown Known” expecting Morris to pull off a similar feat with Rumsfeld and coax out an Iraq-based confession. But this in not the case. In an ironic twist, we hear that while he was serving in the Nixon administration, Rumsfeld was considered a persona non grata and so sent to work on foreign shores, a move that saved Rumsfeld’s career from the fallout of the Watergate scandal. Unlike Nixon in the famous post-Watergate Frost/Nixon interview, never once does Rumsfeld break down in tears or confess to any possible wrongdoing. In fact, he seems to actively enjoy justifying himself, and not once does his grinning visage betray even the slightest hint of remorse. He tells Morris “I’ll chalk that one up” with palpable glee on its face, after spieling his way out of Morris’ accusation of “all those torture memos”.

Yet, rather than be the film’s shortcoming, Morris turns Rumsfeld’s unfazed performance to his advantage. As Rumsfeld spins his self-justificatory rhetoric, Morris often intercuts imagery or footage that undermines it. At one point, Rumsfeld denies that the US public were ever led to believe Al Qaeda and Saddam Hussein were connected, just before cutting to footage from a 2003 press conference where Rumsfeld responds to Saddam Hussein’s claim that Iraq had no WMD’s or links with Al Qaeda with the laconic, “and Abraham Lincoln was short.”

More subtly, Morris gets Rumsfeld to read out some of the hundreds of memos, nicknamed “snowflakes”, he recorded during his lengthy career. These snowflakes are then realised in the repeated image of a snow globe containing a miniature Washington monument. Throughout, the monument remains obscured by the snowflakes, only clearing when we reach his final memo that simply states, “the blizzard is over”. This powerful image of language being used to obscure rather than clarify, to bring us further away not closer to the truth, highlights exactly what Rumsfeld and his rhetoric are trying to accomplish.

The extraordinary thing about the film is that it takes this analysis to another level, by suggesting that Rumsfeld himself is caught in this blizzard. The title “The Unknown Known” is the fourth variation on the series of “known knowns, known unknowns and unknown unknowns” Rumsfeld described in a 2002 press conference about the lack of evidence of WMDs in Iraq.

In their original incarnation, the first three were intended to provide rhetorical support for a potential invasion. At the start of the film, Rumsfeld reads out a memo from 2004 that gives his definition of the “unknown known” as, “things that you think you know, that it turns out you did not”. This pretty clearly refers to the faulty evidence they had for the invasion, and seems like a strategy for avoiding blame. But at the end of the film, Rumsfeld admits he got his definition of “unknown known” wrong. Really, it should have been, “things that you may know, that you don’t think you know”. Another way to put this would be, ‘things you knew deep down, but had refused to consciously acknowledge’. The redefinition makes you think once again about the lack of remorse Rumsfeld displays throughout the film, whilst also reinforcing the idea that he really believes the rhetoric he’s spinning.

You come away with the conclusion that this is a man caught up in his own sophistry; in a blizzard so thick, that he will never have to properly consider the consequences of his actions or feel the guilt that would come from an honest introspection. In its own warped way, this is his genius; and in revealing this to the public, Morris has produced an astounding piece of work. 

NUS National Conference: Vote against UKIP passed

2

This week, the NUS National Conference 2014 meets in Liverpool, where hundreds of delegates from universities across the UK discuss and vote on official NUS policy for the year ahead, as well as choosing a new president and senior officials.

Day one of the conference saw the following motions pass:

●  Motion in favour of a campaigning partnership with the Trades Union Congress

●  Motion opposing all fees associated with exam resits

●  Motion in favour of setting up of a legal fund to support arrested student protesters

●  Motion opposing UKIP

●  Motion opposing the privatisation of student loans

●  Motion supporting a 5:1 pay ratio for all university staff, whereby the highest-paid employees could not be given a salary more than five times higher than that of the lowest-paid employees.

There was controversy over a proposal for a national demonstration, with critics pointing out the lack of clarity over the aims of such a protest. A delegate from Liverpool said, “I love a demo, but the proposers of this amendment don’t care what this demo is for. It’s a demo for demo’s sake.” The motion failed by 285 votes to 341.

There was further debate over the #copsoffcampus campaign, which advocates a system similar to that in other countries, whereby police require the permission of both student unions and university management before they can enter a university campus. Daniel Cooper, vice president of the University of London Union, said, “In many countries it’s taken for granted that police do not walk onto campus whenever they like. NUS should campaign for laws that police cannot come onto campus without permission. In the last year in the majority of cases police have not acted in students’ interest, they have made students’ life more difficult.”

Others questioned the practicality of the motion. “Police can’t have to go through the student union every time they want to go on campus, what about victims of harassment who don’t want to go through the student unions?” one delegate said.

The motion to oppose UKIP attracted further controversy. Daniel Cooper, speaking in favour of the motion, said, “We should be alarmed by the rise of UKIP, a party that represents the worst of UK society, racism, xenophobia and a narrow minded approach that could cut us off from Europe. UKIP voters are looking for answers, but UKIP have no answers. Immigration is not the cause of job losses and lower wages. Business and politicians are. Let us tell UKIP that their politics are not welcome in our movement.”

Members of the party have objected to the decision. Jack Duffin, chairman of UKIP’s youth wing, Youth Independence, and one of the four NUS presidential candidates, said, “I am very disappointed that NUS has voted to oppose UKIP on a national level at its conference.

“This will alienate many students who are involved in UKIP but also people who hold a different view to the handful of students at NUS Conference.

“This shows their disregard for democracy and disdain for alternative, mainstream political views. We as a movement do not believe NUS should not be marginalising thousands of students and societies across their campuses. This is bizarre, pathetic posturing once again demonstrates how the NUS lacks focus on the issue that students really care about: education.”

Among the OUSU delegates were OUSU President Tom Rutland, President-elect Louis Trup and Nathan Akehurst, who headed the “Reclaim OUSU” presidential campaign in 2013. Akehurst is a candidate for the NUS Block of 15, a group of 15 individually elected officials. His manifesto promises, “A democratic, campaigning and transparent national union that integrates liberation with all its work”. 

OUSU will be holding an all-student referendum in the fourth week of Trinity Term, where they will ask students to vote on their affiliation with the NUS. What happens with this conference will undoubtedly be taken into consideration by students deciding which way to vote. 

Introduction to… Electro-Swing

0

You may have heard its jazzy rhythms and techno beats reverberating through the stony subterreanea of Babylove or the ecclesiastical expanse of Freud’s. If you were lucky enough to spend Valentine’s weekend at Catz Ball (and if the unlimited free booze didn’t completely rob you of your consciousness) you may have seen one of this genre’s main players, Swing Republic, taking headline stage. It is electro-swing, the latest music craze to hit the world and, a few months later – Oxford. 

Electro swing fuses the fluid sounds of 20s and 30s jazz and swing with the heavy beats of house, hip-hop and electronic dance music. It’s Louis Armstrong meets Swedish House Mafia. It’s Etta meets Guetta.

These two seemingly disparate musical movements may have more in common than one might think. For example, the ‘Lindy Hop’, a staple dance in the swing era is, in fact, an early precursor of breakdance – both were invented as forms of street dance by young African Americans in New York.

Far from being the new kid on the music block, electro swing really traces its roots to the late nineties/early noughties, when there appeared sporadic hits such as Jurassic 5’s “Swing Set”, Gry & F.M. Einheit’s and “Princess Crocodile”. Mr. Scruff’s “Get A Move On” is a tune which I, personally, will always associate with the scene in ‘What a Girl Wants’ when Amanda Bynes inexplicably tumbles off a catwalk.

However, many will agree that the genre really hit the ground swinging with the 2006 album of record label G-Swing. With a self explanatory title, Swing for Modern Clubbing, the songs feature looped extracts of vintage swing intermingled with modern techno. For the first time, the modern clubber could dance to Nina Simone and Duke Ellington.

It was only a few years later – in 2009 – that the genre started to be defined and its name coined, with the appearance of compilation albums such as Freshly Squeezed Music’s “White Mink: Black Cotton (Electro Swing versus Speakeasy Jazz)” and Wagram’s ‘Electro swing’. London Time-Out was quick to sing electro swing’s praises, ecstatically stating: ‘Yes, this really is a new genre, and an exciting one at last!’ 

TOP TUNES:

  1. “Suzy” – Caravan Palace

The video for this song features a robot and a flapper having a boogie, which epitomizes electro swing’s fusion of the modern and the neo-vintage.

  1. “Kisskiss” – Parov Stelar

In this track the monotony of a looped swing sample is broken by some trumpeted interjections, jazzy riffs and electro beats.

  1. “I’ve Got That Tune” – Chinese Man

The opening tune of pure swing reoccurs throughout the track with different electro embellishments, running as an underscore to some 20s-style female vocals infused with contemporary influences.

  1. “Bang Bang” – Will.i.am

Arguably the best product of the Great Gatsby OST, this song is an upbeat mélange of jazz instrumentals and synthpop. It contains elements of the Charleston and Louis-Armstrong-inspired lead male vocals.

  1. “Swingy Mama” – DJ Farrapo

This track is something of a swing sandwich. It begins and ends with uninterrupted electro beats, which frame a melody of jazz, ragtime and rap.

 

 

A Response to Dear Harvard

0

I don’t know who you are, mystery woman from this now famous Crimson article (http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2014/3/31/Harvard-sexual-assault/) but I thank you. If we walked past each other in the street, we would not know each other but it is articles much like yours that changed my life for the better. Last year I was sexually assaulted here in Oxford by a fellow student. I’m not going into details. But while the Universities culture is not friendly to survivors, I received invaluable support and compassion by both my college and Oxford University’s administration. So I am writing this to tell women and men of Oxford who are survivors of sexual violence that you can come forward, and that contrary to popular perception, Oxford will not ignore or belittle your experiences.

One of the worst experiences any survivor can have is finding that some of those you once thought you trusted and could rely on don’t believe you, or worse, slander you to him and his friends. On finding that those I trusted didn’t believe me I started lying about it. Eventually lying to the outside world turned into lying to myself; my friends knew him as such a sweet, nice guy, so he couldn’t possibly have done this!

So I didn’t go to college administration at the time. But months down the line, I stumbled across an article about the definitions of rape & sexual assault, and something inside my head clicked. Some friends had recognised it for what it was at the time, but I could never bring myself to acknowledge it as assault before – but here it was in cold hard English. I was ashamed by what happened; it took me months, but eventually I felt as though I could emotionally stand the loneliness and isolation and pain no longer. 

Once I did reach out, I remember feeling so safe that I was able to really cry for the first time. I sat there in a wooden chair in someone’s office, so broken and covered in tears that I couldn’t even sit up or form a sentence. I previously had felt so unsafe, as if I couldn’t trust my friends and if I talked about it then he would somehow find out. I had no space of trust to really talk to someone – I grew, after all, to mistrust my friends due to the incident. I still feel distant and isolated from them, but talking with college gave me the courage and safe space to start accepting what had happened. 

I didn’t take any action against the attacker; for fear that no one would believe me over him and fear that he would try to turn my friends against me. It was so bad at one point that I was on the verge of rustication. Many people told me that I was cowardly, that I was ‘protecting him’ – but honestly, I was only ever trying to protect myself from him. I only hope that they understand.

I have lost more friends than I could count on a single hand over what happened. I felt as though the ensuing ordeal was my fault, that it was my fault that it had gotten back to him, that I felt that I could no longer trust anyone. I became paranoid and depressed. I covered it up with drink, drugs and sex for a long time until I realised that I was spiralling out of control.

It was hard going to someone. It will always be hard to talk about what happened and wonder whether they believe you, whether they’re stacking up your character against his in their minds, whether they care or whether they really want to be working instead. But once I started crying that afternoon in that chair, I realised that I could not find fault with the administration who I spoke to regarding the assault. They encouraged me to come to them but never forced me – they simply were there for months, knowing but giving me space. They helped me seek out counselling, they talked it over with me for many, many hours over many, many cups of tea.

They assured me that should I feel it necessary, he could be banned from college.

They said that the Proctors would know about my circumstances so that the stress that I was overwhelmed with at the time would not have affected my exam results. Even though I never took any of those routes due to fear and an unwillingness to address the incident at the time, the fact that they were so supportive shocked me – and the fact that even though I never took action they are still supportive and caring and check up on me now, a year and a half on, has meant so much to me. Thank you if you are reading this.

That is why I am so grateful to the anonymous woman from Harvard. The authorities at Harvard may be against her, but the authorities at Oxford are not against us, despite what the media perception of Oxford may imply. I am grateful to her and those like her – without those kinds of articles I would never have been aware of what happened to me, I would never have spoken to my college and found the support that I never realised I needed, and I would have lived in a state of confusion for years.

These articles are written by strong, inspiring women who take on their attackers and universities and win and those help many others. This article is trying to help those women who have been assaulted here at Oxford to come forward – not necessarily publicly – but to come to something safe, to somewhere that you can get help and support. Addressing your assault doesn’t have to inspire you to change a system that works, and it will take your side in battles – aside from those you have with yourself. I was so proud and so scared for so long that I unnecessarily lived in fear for months. It’s hard to do, but I felt so much better once I had – and you will be surprised at how much is available for you. Good luck, and whatever you decide to do, however it feels at the moment, there is a safe space for you somewhere. So email a welfare officer and you might be surprised – there’s always at least one person rooting for you.

Oxford victorious in 160th University Boat Race

0

Umpire Richard Phelps was defiant: “If you want a nice, easy, clean boat race, go to Lucerne and race it in July.” Many of those huddled on the banks of the Thames under grey skies and drizzling rain wouldn’t exactly be averse to the suggestion.

Phelps, however, was referring not to the April showers but to the major talking point of the race: the clash of oars that saw Cambridge number two seat Luke Juckett briefly thrown from his seat. In the 160th BNY Mellon Boat Race, a contest in which Oxford were already overwhelming favourites, it was this incident – five minutes into the race – which finally put the contest beyond a valiant Cambridge crew. Oxford ultimately triumphed by the mammoth margin of eleven lengths, with a time of 18 minutes and 36 seconds – the most decisive Boat Race victory since 1973.

Cambridge faced an uphill battle from the start. Oxford, able to call on three Olympic rowers and the unmatched experience of coach Sean Bowden, presented a formidable opposition. Meanwhile, the Dark Blues’ dominant performances in pre-race contests against Molesey, Leander and the German U23 crew offered their opponents little in the way of encouragement. As if that were not enough, the Dark Blues won the toss, electing to take up their position on the Surrey station.

Nevertheless, the early stages of the race were tight and tense – Oxford initially took a marginal lead, only for Cambridge to claw back the lost ground, using their advantage around the Middlesex bend to good effect. Disaster, however, lay just around the corner for the Cambridge crew. Such was the intensity of competition in these early stages that a clash of oars was always a possibility – umpire Richard Phelps was forced to issue warnings to both boats. When the clash did come, in Phelps’ own words, “the contact was slight but the impact was great”; the Cambridge crew will feel its reverberations for weeks and months to come. The oar of Sam O’Connor, the Oxford 7-seat, clipped that of the unfortunate Luke Juckett. Juckett came off worse, catching a crab, as he was knocked out of his seat, his rigger badly damaged. From hereon in, there could be only one winner.

The Oxford crew, like all great sportsmen, were ruthless, never easing up, refusing to allow complacency to creep in. Cambridge battled on valiantly, cox Ian Middleton urging his men to believe the game was not up, but as the gap grew and grew – reaching five lengths by Chiswick Steps – his barking seemed ever more futile. When the triumphant Dark Blues did cross the finish line at Putney Bridge, they had extended their lead to eleven lengths. An immediate Cambridge appeal, claiming that Oxford were at fault for the clash, was quickly rejected by umpire Phelps, who maintained that “Oxford were on their proper station, quite clearly”. There was, then, to be no divine intervention for Cambridge.

Despite Bowden’s post-race claim that the outcome would most likely have been the same without Juckett’s crab-catching, the reality is that for all Oxford’s talent and experience, this looked to be a fairly tight encounter – albeit one in which Oxford looked on the verge of pulling away – until its course was irreversibly determined by the clash. The same cannot be said for the race between Oxford’s reserve boat, Isis, and their Cambridge opponents, Goldie. This, though admittedly bereft of summer Lucerne sunshine, was a contest as clean as straightforward as they come – and one from which Isis emerged with an incredible thirteen-length lead.  

Cambridge coach Steve Trapmore billed this as a “David versus Goliath” clash. However, he and his crew found out in the harshest possible way that for most would-be Davids there is no happy ending. At the end of a triumphant Varsity Boat Race series – with victories across the board for Oxford’s male and female rowers – “the river”, as Oxford stroke Constantine Louloudis put it, “is running dark blue”.  

For Cherwell’s coverage of the Boat Race as it happened, see here.

 

Zurich and Vaduz: A foray into last-minute travel

0

I have noticed a curious phenomenon as spring vacation unfolds. International students hanker after travel, while British students remain bemused. It makes sense. I’m from San Francisco and left famous tourist sites unvisited until I hosted friends from out of the state/country.

One such friend came to visit from the U.S. a few weeks ago. In a Skyping-frenzy before her arrival we searched the internet for last-minute plane tickets. We had the somewhat panicked attitude of two Americans faced with free time in Europe and the cultural imperative to Travel. With ten minutes left before my friend had to go to class we picked Zurich, solely because it was cheaper than the first destination we checked.

A week and a half after we had bought the tickets, we stood outside the airport, Zürich Flughafen, waiting for a shuttle bus that didn’t come. Instead, we took a taxi from the airport and got into the city by midnight. (The wiser among us might consider booking a flight that doesn’t arrive in the middle of the night, then opting for the far cheaper train). What do you do with Zurich, two days, and a student budget?

If you are travelling with a friend and want to be able to hold a civil conversation by the end of the trip, don’t stay out from eight a.m. to one a.m. without a nap. And embarrass yourselves with music only you two like. This is why I have re-enacted scenes from Lord of the Rings in Iceland, and why I have belted out Backstreet Boys across the globe.

We went to Uetliberg, a mountain offering a view of Zurich and the Alps within tram-ride distance from the city centre. We walked around the lake and across bridges, into churches and cafes, and down side streets. We ate at a place called Cakefriends.

Our sojourn into Lichtenstein was impromptu: we had meant to go to the Swiss history museum. The museum happened to be next to the train station, and a quick stop at the tourist information centre told us that the next train to Liechtenstein left in fifteen minutes. Or, more accurately, to the station nearest the Liechtenstein border, Sargans. In an hour we had wound our way through cows, snowy mountains and lakes, all the way to Sargans. A neon-yellow bus was the next victim of our One Direction recital. It took us to the capital of Liechtenstein, Vaduz, population: 5,000.

We did not spend a lot of time in Vaduz. We ate lunch (garlic cream soup and something involving bacon dumplings), bought some chapstick from a pharmacy, looked around a gift shop, and got back on the bus. My friend fell asleep while I watched the carousel of castles and cows from the window. Eight hours later, we touched down into London; my feet had stopped itching.

Oxford domination not enough to prevent Tab varsity win

0

Cambridge edged to victory over Oxford in a penalty shootout in a game largely dominated by the dark blues. 90 minutes wasn’t enough for either team to hit the back of the net, leaving Cambridge to take the spoils 4-2 in spot kicks.

Oxford went into the match with only 3 returning blues compared to Cambridge’s 8, giving the tabs the advantage of experience.

This year’s varsity football match shared the spotlight with two other sporting spectacles that took place on the same day. The Cherwell Sport team found themselves covering both the boat race and goat race as well as the football on this cloudy Sunday afternoon.

In the first return for this fixture to Craven Cottage for five years, an impressive crowd of 3,341 saw a first half characterised by nervy play, with both teams struggling to retain possession, and neither team managing to fully find their feet. Cambridge showed the first real attack of the game, but the resulting shot was well blocked by Ben May.

Both teams struggled to get on the ball for extended periods of time, and only really settled into it after half an hour. Oxford’s Ezra Rubstein showed flashes of his potential that failed to materialise into any clear-cut opportunities, but still demonstrated why he is the most capped blues footballer of all time. The dark blues’ first chance of the game came after 18 minutes, with Toner hitting the post from a well delivered cross from Aidan Barry.

Eight minutes later, Barry was lucky not to receive a card after committing a foul that has been described as ‘Matt Nicol-esque’ after Nicol’s notorious challenge made in last year’s Varsity game.

The match remained fairly uneventful until the 34th minute, when Beck-Friis headed Rubenstein’s free kick over the bar. This triggered an upsurge in the performance of both teams, with a flurry of efforts towards the end of the first half. Rubstein’s bending shot was caught by Cambridge keeper Kent on 42 minutes, and Adriaenssens fired over the bar in the 44th to go into half time level pegging at 0-0.

Both sides went into the second half unchanged and Oxford had an early chance with Ben May heading over the bar from Essman’s long throw after 51 minutes. Cambridge began to show signs of fragility with their keeper juggling a cross and nearly letting Oxford’s forwards in on goal after 54 minutes. Cramp began to strike the tabs like wild fire as the second half went on, but they did begin to open up Oxford’s defence. Oxford’s keeper handled a long range shot well after 65 minutes.

With cries raining from the terraces of “Do something”, the game remained tame at 75 minutes.

Beck-Friis showed considerable skill by taking on players down the line and orchestrating an attack that led to a penalty shout for a Cambridge handball after 77 minutes. Referee Jon Moss instead waved the appeals, signalling a corner to Oxford.

Cambridge’s Chris Hutton was the second player to avoid a card after a double footed lunge on Tom Hobkinhson in the 79th minute. Oxford went on to dominate the closing stages of the match, offering Cambridge only one chance which Hutton failed to put away after Farmer blocked well in the 84 minute.

The game ended with a succession of Oxford corners, only for Beck-Friis to fire over at the near post. With Oxford failing to capitalise, the referee blew the whistle, consigning the game to a tense penalty shootout. Cambridge was first to step up, firing in to the bottom corner, but Rubenstein quickly pegged them back to 1-1. Hutton put the tabs ahead again with a shot straight down the middle, but Tozer fired his response over the bar allowing Cambridge to take the lead. The next two penalties were calmly put away by players from both sides, with Farmer coming close to saving. Gorringe put the Tabs 4-2 ahead, and then Heardman stepped up to keep Oxford in the game. His first touch of the game unfortunately sent the ball wide of the post, giving Cambridge their 50th Varsity win, level pegging with Oxford.

Both Oxford centre halves were deserving of the Man of the Match title, whose defensive displays shone in a game largely devoid of chances, but Mike Moneke took the official title over teammate Ben May. It was disappointing to see the performance put in by the dark blues not represented in a final scoreline which gave fair due to their dominance, especially in the second half in which Cambridge barely had a sniff at goal. Both sides will look forward to next year’s fixture with the overall scores now level at 50 wins apiece.