Monday, May 19, 2025
Blog Page 1477

Bubble Vision: House of Lords

0

Visiting the House of Lords is a stark reminder of the sort of society we still live in. My photo was taken, my body was scanned for hidden metal, my possessions were x-rayed. And for what? So that I don’t kill a crusty old man with a pair of nailclippers, or pull a Guy Fawkes and bring down this bastion of ‘old democracy’? 

There are 755 seats in the Lords, of which only 180 are crossbenchers and a meagre 21 are non-affiliated. The chamber is undeniably political- it’s a seething mass of donors, campaigners and high-flyers with a partisan inclination. 15 of these seats are still held by hereditary peers, one of whom, Lord Willoughby de Broke, has now aligned himself with UKIP. Of course, they aren’t really to blame for their part in this masquerade. They’re the out-dated relics; the standard bearers for absolute monarchy, serfdom and afternoon tea. It’s not for them to reform themselves.

But unlike the Queen and her family, the Lords still have a political purpose. Elizabeth II’s role in our constitution is incontrovertibly undemocratic, but, at the same time, we’ve come to accept that she’s really there to sell stamps and bring in the floods of Japanese tourists with their Yen that props up our ailing services economy. She’s the ultimate tour-guide and she’s handsomely rewarded for it.

The Lords has none of that purpose or charm, but, instead, serves a political function as part of our ludicrous bicameral parliament. Where the US’s bicameral system is represented by two elected bodies (the Senate and the House of Representatives), the country that gave birth to American democracy still harbours the fugitive anachronism of an unelected chamber. Life peers have diluted public consciousness of the problem, but have exacerbated the reality. Who elected Baroness Warsi to sit in cabinet meetings and espouse her contemptible views on gay rights? Who gave this chamber authority to comment on, let alone shoot down, any bill it chooses?

Of course, these are old arguments that were addressed in the 1999 House of Lords Act. But the problem hasn’t been solved, it’s simply been pushed away from the media limelight. The antiquarian concept of the ‘House of Lords’, or of a ‘Lord’ in general, is at the heart of Britain’s indefatigable class problem. A fresh faced 18-year-old David Cameron, finally removing his Etonian smock, faces the challenging question of whether he should pursue his political career by seeking election to the House of Commons, or by rubbing his posh friends the right way until he trumps his Grand Daddy (a mere baronet, yuck!) and gets a seat in the Lords. That is the process by which we have inadvertently built our Tory cabinet, a process that many in Oxford are complicit with.

I’m not a revolutionary or particularly ardent about politics, but we are in danger of forgetting that an appointed chamber is not a democratic chamber. Democracy is not one of those fancy socialist ideas. Nigel Farage believes in the democratic process just as strongly as Red Ed, Caroline Lucas or Dennis Skinner. Radicalism is saying that we should blow up the Lords, gumption is saying we should stop allowing it to decide our laws. Whilst we protect and revere these institutions, we are creating an all-too-visible glass ceiling that, for any number of reasons, isn’t being smashed to pieces.

When I visited the House of Lords with a sea of other Oxonians, I found myself awash with, not abstract repulsion, but idolising stares. The gilded interior of the Union, or the crystal port glasses of OUCA, have caused a collective amnesia about what we should aspire towards. If we wish, in the generation to come, to continue to be at the forefront of the international democratic process, then we need to consign all 755 mummified seats to the graveyard that holds slavery, partial suffrage and those poor, unemployed hereditary peers.

The Oxford Union must be fixed

0

The Oxford Union is more than just an acquaintance of scandal, they are close and personal friends it appears, and so news of another has probably come as no surprise. That some of the actions committed are possibly illegal is, however, a new low. The influence and advantages offered by joining the upper echelons of the Union cannot be doubted, but that does not excuse the actions that a minority of Committee members have taken in order to get to the top. The malicious and possibly illegal actions of the few should not infringe upon the good work the Union and its members actually do, and we should seek to prevent such controversies occurring again.

The Union offers an opportunity for those interested in competitive debating to train and hone their skills, and to compete to an international level. Repeatedly, debate teams from Oxford succeed at a national and international level, highlighting the position of Oxford as a world-class University.

The work individual committee members put into organizing events, debates, and especially speakers is phenomenal – the appearance of John McCain and Nancy Pelosi are impressive victories that must be recognized, especially when one considers that for many it is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to meet such figures. I for one was beside myself when I saw Dambisa Moyo speak in Michaelmas.

Each weekly debate is thought-provoking and educational – recent debates over adoption by same-sex parents, the use of drones in warfare, and the ethics of financial services, are all highly relevant and have been used to expose students to different opinions and points of view. The work of those within the Union is brilliant, and it is a shame that the actions of a few diminish this.

We must all recognize, that despite the Union’s flaws, it is undoubtedly an Oxford institution. The Oxford Union is as much a part of Oxford as punting, subfusc and sunny days in the quad – we cannot deny that. To those outside of the Oxford Bubble, Oxford University and the Union are synonymous. And so, the reputation and prestige of both are interlinked. The recent scandal eventually leaked into the national press, like all Union scandals, once again reinforcing the image that Oxford University is a place of dirty politics.

It is not conducive to condemn it externally, no amount of comment pieces will permanently prevent those seeking elected Union positions from hacking and playing politics. It will be said that the Union needs to change: that it’s committee members should be forced to comply to rules more effectively, that hacking should be cracked down upon, and so on; but the Union cannot change itself over night.

Instead it is we Oxford students who should change the Union from within. The Union needs more people to be active within it, more people to run for election, and more people willing to discipline those who act in a negative fashion. The more decent people who are a part of the Union, the less likely it is that a very small minority will be able to besmirch it’s name, and by extension Oxford’s.

It will be hard to do, undoubtedly – the Union’s reputation of ‘hacking’ is deeply ingrained, students already have an action-packed term without adding Union responsibilities on top, and it can be difficult to operate in such a political atmosphere without succumbing to it, difficult to avoid fighting fire with fire.

Yet it is imperative that we at least try. We cannot stand by and simply bash the Union from afar, as the Union’s reputation can survive and outlast such sniping. We must be responsible for the institution that is an essential part of Oxford, and we can only do this through being active within it. To those who claim it is a dirty place, I ask that you get involved and help to clean it up!

The Union does have its flaws, like any association – in such a politically-charged place, there will undoubtedly be some controversies and scandals. But the flaws are not institutional, they can be fixed, and it is our responsibility to fix them.  

The Oxford clubber’s festival guide

0

Deciding precisely where you want to squander £200 on the right to listen to a Pink Floyd tribute act whilst lying comatose in a pool of your own vomit can be a painful process. Basing your pick of summer festival on which of Oxford’s discothèques you frequent makes this difficult decision a little easier.

If you like Junction, try… V

V is as simple as festivals come. It offers a no-nonsense split between rock and pop royalty, with artists of such regal magnitude as the Kings of Leon and Beyoncé ‘Queen B’ Knowles gracing the main stage. Head to Staffordshire for a weekend of debauchery, albeit debauchery liberally plastered with advertising for Virgin Media, if you frequent Junction. Or indeed Bridge. Or Park End. 

If you like Babylove, try… Latitude

If to you ‘clubbing’ means ‘standing round looking cool with an edgy haircut smoking rollies and talking about photography’, the laid-back atmosphere of the achingly cool music-comedy-poetry-cabaret-dance melting-pot in Suffolk will suit you perfectly. From Kraftwerk to Eddie Izzard, from Bloc Party to the Ballet Boyz, this is the festival for Oxford’s abundance of hipsters to enjoy sneering at. 

If you like Purple Turtle, try… Tramlines

Purple Turtle costs nothing to enter, and with good reason. The previously free Tramlines festival now costs a mere £6 for a day pass, but whereas at PT you will only hear Rebecca Black and moans of despair, you can catch Lianne Le Havas, Toddla T and more at Sheffield’s 3-day shindig. 

If you like Mutiny at Purple Turtle on Sundays, try… Download

To the best of my knowledge, Oxford offers only a solitary metal night. Likewise, Download is more or less the default option as far as hard rock festivals are concerned, offering Slipknot, Iron Maiden and Rammstein amongst others. If you like your guitars thrashed, your pits moshed and your crowds predominantly male and dressed in black, look no further. 

If you like Switch, try… Wakestock

The mid-range acts of the O2’s new EDM night are best mirrored in the convivial atmosphere of Wales’ mid-range music-cum-wakeboarding festival. However, the names at Wakestock are slightly bigger (Bastille, Rudimental, Magnetic Man), and whilst the O2 is essentially a dirty box with some speakers in, the festival on the LlÅ·n Peninsula promises golden sands, roaring surf and (potentially) blue skies.

If you like Cellar, try… Womad

This is perhaps one of the more stretched comparisons on the list. Nonetheless, Cellar’s intermittent Balkan electro-gypsy and reggaeton-dancehall fusion nights come closest to an Oxford approximation of Womad’s globe-spanning eclecticism.  Rokia Traoré and former Brazilian government minister Gilberto Gil spearhead a cosmopolitan line-up.

If you like Carbon, try… Glastonbury

There’s no point of comparison here at all, but nothing Oxford has to offer can compete with Glasto, and this article couldn’t go by without mentioning the almighty grandfather of the UK festival scene. It’s less about the headliners (though the Arctic Monkeys and the Rolling Stones are not to be sneezed at) and more about the vast variety of acts, the eccentricity of the crowd and the sheer scale of it all. If you can, go.

Cherwell’s summer reading: part 1

0

And so, with a frantic denouement of suitcase shovelling and traffic hangovers, the academic year that was 2012-13 has hastily ceased to be. The next fortnight may have been strictly reserved for renewing acquaintances with the family fridge, but few Oxonians can repress that bookish itch for long. Whether basking in the sun, or pressing your nose against wet English windows,  you will want a trusty paperback tucked in your back pocket – and preferably something that isn’t in the Gladstone Link. Here are a few of our choices for any summery circumstances:

 

Ernest Hemingway – The Sun Also Rises

 

Hemingway meets interrailing. Young folks have been tearing up the noble cities of Europe in pursuit of The Great Hedonistic Summer for aeons; and if you are planning to party your way through the continent in the coming weeks, you will be glad to know that you are in fine literary company (see also Fitzgerald’s Tender is the Night). Hemingway’s first novel pithily follows the Lost Generation from Paris to Pamplona to San Sebastian, with just the right mix of cocktails, culture, and existential tourist guilt (largely about the alcohol trumping the appreciation) to appeal to your average Oxford interrailer.

 

P. G. Wodehouse – Summer Lightning

 

Of course, you may just be pottering around at home for a while; and in the (quite likely) event that your domestic life lacks the thrills of a pig-theft mystery, conniving servants or affairs with chorus girls, you can always dip into the splendidly silly world of Blandings Castle. Lord Emsworth’s farcical family and friends make great company on a rainy Thursday morning – if Wodehouse’s playfulness can’t cheer you up, nothing will – and Jeremy Kyle re-runs have nothing on Uncle Galahad’s tale of Sir Gregory Parlsoe-Parsloe and the prawns.

 

Raymond Carver – Cathedral

 

Alternatively, give in to the navel-gazing ennui of the endless empty afternoons, and get Raymond Carver to show you just how petrifyingly inane a day in the life can be. With an acute minimalism that cuts right to the core, Carver’s short stories trace their protagonists through their dead-end jobs, loveless relationships, alcohol problems and stilted conversations with the sort of nihilist coldness that makes Hemingway look like a travelling Punch and Judy showman. Consequently, the occasional touch of human warmth makes for a worthwhile emotional pay-off – and might put the various dolours of sofa-lounging into perspective.

 

Virginia Woolf – To the Lighthouse

 

Family holidays are never smooth affairs, and the Ramsay clan’s trip to their summer cottage is no exception. The presence of eight children and a number of guests is perhaps slightly atypical, but bickering about making a group trip, worrying about whether the dinner is any good, and messing around in the garden and on the beach are all part of the family holiday experience. The editors can only hope that your favourite vacation is never retold with all the Freudian framework, and the nasty bits about the ravishing destruction of time and war.

 

W. E. Bowman – The Ascent of the Rum Doodle

 

One of the classics in the (as yet underappreciated) mountaineering-burlesque genre – and a must-read for anyone setting out on any kind of outward bound holiday. Bowman’s book is a blatant parody of the high seriousness of the major expedition chronicles of the early twentieth century, and brilliantly undercuts the boisterous bravado of the great British orienteers. This is the Catch-22 of adventure writing, and the tale of the crew – “Humphrey Jungle, radio expert and route-finder”, “Ridley Prone, doctor”, and so on – is certain to amuse.

An open letter about the Oxford Union

0

First of all, I’d like to apologise to Union members. There has been wrongdoing and immaturity on all sides in this term’s elections, and the society’s members deserve better. I don’t deny that I played a part in this, and for that I am sorry. The internet memes I had a hand in creating were in bad taste, but it’s worth saying that they were taken out of context, and were motivated by personal (admittedly petty) rivalry with one individual, and not remotely by sexism. While some of my behaviour may have been immature and tasteless, the actions of others against me have been far more malicious and at times illegal.

Much of the wrongdoing of the past few weeks has gone unreported. In the week prior to the election, my computer was hacked into, and then wiped. The evidence illegally obtained from my computer was then used as blackmail to stop me from taking up my position, and to stop Crawford Jamieson from taking part in the upcoming election. Crawford, though in no way implicated in the allegations levelled against me, decided to submit to the demands of the blackmailers in order to help save my reputation. What Crawford did for me, as a friend, was an honourable act which shows the best facets of Union politics. The evidence against me, having already been used for intimidation and blackmail, was then leaked to the press in an attempt by others to ruin my character. Here is my side of the story.

On 30th May, I left my laptop locked in one of the Union’s offices after speaking in a debate about banking. I didn’t take it back to college with me, and instead returned the morning after to submit my nomination for Secretary of the Union. I opened my laptop to a blank, white screen. In the middle of the screen, there was a flashing question mark. This symbol, it transpired, meant that my laptop and all its contents had been wiped. I lost an entire year of work, along with pictures, music, and all my other files. I have no way of proving exactly who it was that hacked my computer, blackmailed me, and spread malicious rumours.

In the days following, screenshots of my laptop were shown to various senior members of the Oxford Union committee, all dated to the night of the debate, between 02:55 and 05:58 in the early morning. From the evidence that was subsequently leaked to Cherwell, it is clear that whoever hacked my computer did so with the sole aim of discovering something — anything — that could be used against me and Crawford in the Union election. With the threat of press involvement growing, both Crawford and I decided it would be easiest to give in to these tactics. We felt that such a furore over a student society election was not worth the weeks of worry that would follow.

Though there has been wrongdoing on both sides, the treatment I have endured has been much worse than any student deserves. I never expected for my hard drive to be wiped, my personal emails to be used for blackmail and intimidation, and for my political opponents to use this illegally obtained evidence to spread malicious rumours about me amongst the student population. In the last two weeks, I received many texts from friends around Oxford who had been told that I was sent down as a result of the allegations against me — entirely false. Whatever immature jokes I have been responsible for pale in comparison to the personally damaging allegations that I know were circulated against me, not to mention the vicious way I have been treated by those who wished to ruin my reputation.

Oxford Access schemes: are they working?

0

In a report published by the government’s social mobility adviser on Monday, the number of working class entrants to prestigious universities is said to be dwindling. Interest about admissions to top universities is no new thing; even as early as 1852, the Royal Commissions listed access to students from disadvantaged backgrounds to Oxford and Cambridge as a key issue. 

Oxford is often cited as having one of the better funded access and outreach programmes in the UK, with time and resources dedicated to organising events in and outside of the city targeting students from state schools. In some respects, the outcomes appear very positive. There were over 1000 more applications from the maintained sector in 2012 than in 2006.

Despite the rise in admissions from the sector, acceptance rates for students from this sector remain virtually constant, with about 47% of students (46.8% in 2007) coming from the maintained sector. Indeed, even with the enormous increase in applications, only 39 more students from a maintained school were accepted in 2012 than five years earlier.

The most striking change in maintained applications, however, lies in the rate of success at application. This has dropped over the course of the last five years. In 2006, a student from the maintained sector would have almost a one in four chance of being accepted to the University (25.2%). Yet in 2011, this had dropped to one in five (19.9%).

This information has greater significance when considered in light of the two studies released to the Observer this week. These, produced by the universities of Cardiff and Oxford Brookes, indicate that once at university, state school pupils achieve well beyond their privately educated counterparts.

Oxford Brookes, like the University of Oxford, receives a higher proportion of applicants and entrants from private schools than the average. The findings from their study, however, have prompted the university to adjust their targets for state school entrants and to consider making lower offers to candidates from particularly deprived backgrounds.

These are not the first reports of their kind: earlier research from the University of Bristol published in 2010 is frequently used as an example to justify access measures. Reports of this nature have often been criticised by schools in the independent sector as being incomplete.

Though statistically overrepresented at Oxford, success rates for students from the independent sector have also dropped. In 2007, applicants from the independent sector could expect almost a one in three (30.3%) chance of being admitted to the university. This is now at one in four (25.0%). 

In 2012, there were over 100 fewer students from the state sector admitted to Oxford, with the acceptance rate moving from 43.4% (37.5%). Though the independent sector educates only 7% of the total UK school population, they account for 15% of all A-level entries, while 33% of students receiving three As are privately educated.

Five years on, there are fewer students from the independent sector. But if the number of successful state-educated applicants remains the same, what makes up the shortfall? 15.6% of successful applicants in 2012 are neither privately nor state educated, comprising the ‘Other’ category. These include independent or overseas applicants. This has increased by over 5% from 10.1% (11.4% post-qualification) in 2006.

It is difficult to draw decisive conclusions from all this information, though exciting to note significant increases in applications from the state sector. However, while Oxford’s target of 62% of applicants from state schools is easily being met, it remains to be seen precisely how the university intends to turn a high rate of state-educated Oxford applicants into an equivalent rate of state-educated Oxford students.

Playing the Game with Strauss

0

I‘ve really seen the face of darkness…. I’m not even going to have my name on this book because it’s so dark and dangerous; when you see the face of evil, stare into the abyss… I think I’ve come really close to the fire and if I get through this book and don’t get consumed alive I think I may be done with the dark side.” It was going to be an exciting interview when this was the answer to my first question, on why Neil Strauss professed to only be interested in exploring the dark side of human experience.

There are few people who’ve mined the well of human hedonism, fame and insanity as deeply as him; he’s shot guns with Ludacris, been kidnapped by Courtney Love, made Lady Gaga cry. He’s gone drinking with Bruce Springsteen, tried to prevent Motley Crue from getting arrested, received Scientology Lessons from Snoop Dogg, flown a helicopter with Madonna, been taught mind reading by the CIA and been soaked in a hot tub by Marilyn Manson. He’s also slept with more of the world’s most beautiful women than you can imagine, as chronicled in the his infamous “The Game”, which details how he became one of the world’s greatest pickup artists, an sobriquet that has earned him the ire of the majority of women and the burning jealousy of the majority of men.

He’s shot guns with Ludacris, been kidnapped by Courtney Love and made Lady Gaga cry

I put to him a proposition that many, from Rainer Maria Rilke to Christopher Hitchens to Robert Fisk have all advanced; if you want to be a writer it must not be a question of wanting to write; rather it is that you must write; it has to be the only thing you know you can do. He tells me “Yeah I think that’s very true; I was the kid in second grade who always had his nose in a book. When I was 11, I wrote my first book and earlier than that I made a magazine. In second grade I wrote this essay that said that when I grow up, I want to be a writer and own a million books.”

He goes on to say “I don’t think there’s any lifestyle more exciting than journalism. A rock star or a politician or whatever is stuck in their lifestyle; as a journalist you get to jump into whatever you want; it’s a roulette wheel. When I was writing for the New York Times I’d think ‘what would I like to explore?’ and then I’d get to go to Cuba and Iran and Uzbekistan and hang out with movie stars and religious leaders. You can enjoy whatever lifestyle you want and you don’t have to stay with it.”

His list of interviews surely dwarfs that of any other celebrity journalist. I ask him for his advice on what to do when an interview starts to go wrong. “The bad interviews sometimes make for the best articles; I had an interview with the Julian Casablancas of the Strokes where he just got wasted and kept turning off the tape recorder and tried to kiss me and then just rolled off in a wheelchair. At the time I thought the interview was a disaster, but it makes for a really funny article and it shows you who they are.”
As for a less interesting descent into madness, “African blues singer Ali Farka Toure just answered everything monosyllabically. It’s really funny because it just shows his personality.”

With this in mind, I ask him about the technique involved with coaxing important or revealing information about of an interviewee, as well as his favourite “gotcha moment,” for which he scolds me. “I never think of it as a gotcha moment – I’m never going in antagonistically. Most important of all, be non-judgemental; I’ve been on both sides of an interview many times, and I can say when people feel judged they shut down and maybe just tell you what you want to hear.”

“When I’m doing an interview, particularly if it’s something big like a Rolling Stone Profile, I’ll read every story ever written on this person and I’ll try to avoid anything they’ve already said. I want to push the public’s knowledge about this person further.”

“When I was 11, I wrote my first book and earlier than that I made a magazine”

He goes on to illustrate this with one of his most poignant anecdotes; “I remember when I first interviewed Christina Aguilera and she just kept looking out of the window of the car and spacing out. I said to myself ‘what kind of people just disconnect like that?’ People who are abused as children do that, because they can’t run away so just go somewhere in their heads.

“At this time she’d never talked about her past, so I asked her if she’d been around abuse and she opened up. She talked about growing up around domestic violence; when I first met her she was just this bubblegum teenage girl into shopping and I thought this would be the worst experience ever; but at the end we really grew close.”

He goes on to relate a similar story about his recent Rolling Stone profile of Skrillex. “When it was the last day after the interview he was saying that people make fun of his hair. The reason he shapes it like that is because he has acne scars. It’s to show that he’s not afraid to show who he is. It was a beautiful, vulnerable moment and that only came out after building that special kind of rapport.”

The conversation then turned to the more salacious part of his journalistic oeuvre – his expose of the world of Seduction community, a group of previous beta males turned wannabe Casanovas that topped the New York Times bestseller list and earned him scores of closet readers. I wish I could tell my readers that I read this book purely out of journalistic interest. One thing that struck me about the book was that its ending plays it out as a moral fable, with Strauss renouncing seduction for a girl he falls truly in love with.

Life itself tends to dislike simple happy endings and the relationship broke down shortly after the book’s publication. I ask him if he has any regrets about making the book’s moral hook something that turned out to be transient and fleeting: “Not a word, and I’ve never even thought about changing it. I ask you, if a relationship doesn’t last for ever, does that make it a failure?”

Rather put on the spot, I mumble a rather banal truism about how what is important about a relationship is what you learn from it and if it helps you grow. He replies, “I think there’s a funny idea in this culture that if a relationship doesn’t last forever then it’s a failure. What I wrote about Lisa, everything was true. It was a great relationship and it got me out of the dysfunctional Pick Up Artist world and taught me a lot about myself; she was and still is an awesome person.

“I think we have a lot of ideas in our culture like this – that love or a relationship has to be forever to make it worthwhile and I just don’t think that’s true.”

“The Game is a book about male insecurity much more than tactics to have sex with women” 

The Game, unsurprisingly, is often accused of being fervently misogynistic. It recounts a series of ploys and tactics that turn women into sexual objects worthy of conquest rather than value. Pick Up Artists claim that they are merely levelling the playing field for men, who Neil describes as “guys who are virgins at 30, guys who may have never even been on a date or held a girls hand” having lost natures lottery of looks, charm or attractiveness. I put forward Saul Bellow’s quip about the American dream to Neil. These men have ‘the universal eligibility to be noble.’

“I think that’s an interesting thought. It’s funny, because to me whenever someone criticizes ‘the game’, they think the book’s a giant endorsement of this lifestyle when it opens with the ‘world’s greatest pick up artist’ having a complete mental breakdown and preparing to kill himself. To me it’s a book about male insecurity much more than tactics to have sex with women.”

He continued, “I had to go through the dark side, losing authenticity, separating men and women in this odd way. If you take this journey with some self-awareness, I encourage guys to take control of an area of their lives that many men are particularly uncomfortable with and struggle with. There are loads of people who are living life and aren’t comfortable in their own skins. That’s the message I was trying to get across.”

Style Hunter Trinity 13

0

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%7860%%[/mm-hide-text]

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%7861%%[/mm-hide-text]

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%7862%%[/mm-hide-text]

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%7864%%[/mm-hide-text]

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%7866%%[/mm-hide-text]

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%7867%%[/mm-hide-text]

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%7868%%[/mm-hide-text]

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%7870%%[/mm-hide-text]

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%7871%%[/mm-hide-text]

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%7872%%[/mm-hide-text]