Monday, May 19, 2025
Blog Page 1478

Spotlight on…OUDS 24-Hour Play

0

At 8pm on Saturday, a motley crew of thesps, budding directors and writers, met up in the White Rabbit pub to begin their mission: crafting, rehearsing and putting on a play, all in twenty-four hours. The brainstorming began with thoughts of a Shakespeare medley – but this seemed to carry on too much from last year’s expedited version of the Comedy of Errors. Eventually discussions turned to the idea of villains, getting under their skin and seeing stories from their point of view for a change. Rehearsals started in the morning on Sunday and the result was performed in Brasenose College at 8pm the next day.

I’m told the play, in its initial stages, was meant to be “a lot darker”; this surprises me as the whole thing was laugh-out-loud funny. Cruella DeVille (Ella Waldman) is first introduced on video, adding a high-tech edge to the production. She explains the main premise of the plot: villains are invited to join De Ville’s Villain Rehabilitation Centre, learning what they had done wrong in order to get killed the first time round. Invited to rehab sessions at “The Satanic Mill, Gingerbread Street, Mordor”, classic Gaston, Captain Hook, Ursula, the Evil Queen and Scar congregate in an Alcoholics-Anonymous-style circle of chairs, and hilarity ensues as each of them tells their story of failed villainy.

Twenty-four hours – “more like 5 hours” of rehearsing proper, retorts Waldman – is clearly long enough for this improvised team of thesps to produce some seriously funny parodies. Captain Hook (Tim Gibson) is made incredibly camp and excitable, Gaston (Nick Lyons) is hugely confident with a tendency to burst into song at several intervals, and Scar is delightfully bitter and twisted about his failure to “kill the kid!” Cruella’s advice to them is to avoid high places (this is especially relevant to the Evil Queen, played by Ellie Page, from Snow White) and never trust anyone.

Katie Ebner-Landy, president of OUDS, said this year was the first time video was incorporated. The technological element is likely to develop more year by year, and special effects are surely not that far off in the future.
Griffith Rees doubles up as director and the charming and frighteningly accurate voice-over of Mickey Mouse, whom Cruella phones during a break to consider the villains’ propensities to appear in a sequel. The more profound element of the play is discovered here: a commentary on two-faced corporatism and how it uses personalities for the entertainment of the masses. This comes back to bite Cruella as her rehab patients rebel at the end, refusing to sign contracts for Disney sequels, following her very own villain lessons: number 2 “Don’t trust anyone”.

The writing was fresh, perhaps because of its immediacy and rapid inception, and the stock characters provided by Disney provided a good base for original comedy. In a drama scene where improvisation is the realm of just one comedy group – the Imps – fast-paced improvisational initiatives such as the 24-hour play should be encouraged and rewarded.

Review: The Oxford Revue

0

The Oxford Revue made their first steps on the way to the Ed­inburgh Free Fringe with a lo­cal showcase of their material.

The Oxford Revue is well known for its witty works and its latest concoction, Desperate Liaisons, did not disappoint. The audience was primed by the skilful self-depreca­tion of compère Alex Fox. Although the act began with two somewhat stock sketches, involving superhe­roes and sexual health issues, these were a gateway to their distinctive brand of comedy, with increasingly nuanced sketches. The group incor­porated ingredients of deadpan, farce and parody to produce a come­dy cocktail that goes down a treat for even the most implacable audience. Garnished with self-conscious melo­drama and risky boundary-pushing, the pieces were served with a char­acteristic kick. The group was apt at contrasting the subject matter of their sketches with the responses of their characters, particularly effec­tively in the deliciously inappropri­ate ‘parents’ evening’ scene.

What was especially striking about this act was their abil­ity to exploit the audience’s expectations to their co­medic ends. Again and again they would lull the crowd into assump­tions, only to masterfully subvert them and instead lead them down the absurd passages of their alterna­tives. This was combined with mim­icry of generic dramatic narratives, such as picking up a street-walker, whereby they played on the phrase ‘it’s my birthday’, taking it literally.

The attention to detail was like­wise impressive. They made innova­tive use of the curtain, transforming it into bed clothes at one moment and encasing themselves within it at the next to become ‘floating’ heads. The underground of the stage was used to create portals through which characters could pop up, cre­ating a sense of off-stage action.

The movement of the actors them­selves was similarly impressive, as they managed to differentiate their characters between sketches alter­ing their posture and gestures, as well as their voices. They made equal­ly inventive use of sound in their performance, using it to introduce transitions of mood. It was clear that there was a structure to the perfor­mance as a whole, as a short scene in­volving hats recurred several times forming a recognisable motif which was exploited in the closing scene to make a hilarious ending. Such origi­nality and ingenuity certainly left me tempted to make a trip to Edin­burgh this summer.

Preview: Dealer’s Choice

0

★★★★☆
Four Stars

According to Cameron Cook, who directs Dealer’s Choice as well as playing Mugsy, the bril­liance of the script is that “the words are very funny”. This sums up the ap­peal of the play, which is being per­formed at the Burton Taylor in 8th week.

There is something ineffably pleas­ing about the dialogue Patrick Mar­ber has written. Marber is, like Cook, an ex-Revue man, and the script is clearly the product of a mind used to fast-paced sketch humour. The scenes I saw did not contain con­trived set pieces, absurd slapstick or even many laugh-out-loud lines. Rather, as a motley crowd of huck­sters, shysters and gamblers gather in London’s East End for a poker game, there is a constant flow of con­versation as the cast rattle through a script which doesn’t waste its words.

As an audience member, it is a strangely soothing experience. We are privy to the private conversa­tions of characters who are clearly very close, exchanging insults and one-liners in (often questionable) Cockney accents. It is like being amongst friends; the experience is curiously restful whilst also provid­ing a chuckle on almost every line. That said, the actors face an uphill struggle to make a low-key play set around kitchen tables and bat­tered sofas visually engaging, and the scenes I saw would benefit from stronger direction.

A delightfully sardonic vocal performance from Markian Mysko von Schultze as Sweeney, for exam­ple, was marred by weak physical interpretation — despite playing a chef, there was no need for him to mime vegetable preparation for ten minutes. Cook himself sometimes slipped into clichéd use of gesture. In general, the onus is on the di­rector to add dynamism to scenes which are currently well-rehearsed but lack vitality.

The action develops significantly from the relatively light-hearted opening, as themes of gambling, avarice and sexual tension come up throughout the play. Of the three ac­tors I saw perform, Andy Laithwaite as Frankie appears to have best in­corporated these subtleties into his character, with his wisecracks tem­pered by an undercurrent of brood­ing arrogance. The well-delivered lines with Cook attempting to co­erce von Schultze into playing in the pivotal poker game exposed themes of addiction, and showcased the complex emotions in the play.

The play hinges on quick-fire hu­mour but also on relationships, as we realise these men are “all losers” in life, not just at the poker table. Cook has done well to assemble a competent and engaging cast who can handle the darker side of this blackly comic piece as well as the jokes.

Cook described the script as “tight” in its quickfire humour. What is required now is innovative and assertive direction to ensure the play is equally tight in perfor­mance. I am confident this impres­sive cast will, come opening night, find the effervescence and pace the play needs to come alive.

Review: Dealer’s Choice

0

★★★★☆
Four Stars

Dealer’s Choice is a witty and blackly comic production. In the basement of an empty London restaurant, a weekly staff poker game is in full swing; quick-handed, straight-faced, keen to gain the upper hand, the play is fuelled not only by shifting money but shifting power in the midst of a tangled web of relationships.

Mugsy, a cockney geezer addicted to losing, has big plans for converting a supposedly ‘spacious’ public toilet block into a fancy French restaurant. Played by Cameron Cook, who skilfully negotiates both actor and director of the play, Mugsy’s character provides the laughs. Playfully mocked and belittled by his sardonic boss Steven (Alexander Stutt) a ‘semi’ successful owner of the restaurant, is skeptical of Mugsey’s pursuits as well as those of his son Carl, who is heavily in debt and to his mind a grave disappointment. The cast displayed cohesion and the ability to rebound effortlessly off one another, creating the comfortable, family-like relationship where insults are interlaced with sarcasm: these were well-received on the night by the audience.

Patrick Marber’s writing has elements of light-hearted banter, which suddenly escalate into scenes of tension and rage. The actors hone in on the precariousness of this balance. Kitchen scenes were particularly effective in providing rapid exchanges strewn with a wit: Markian Mysko von Schultze’s performance of Sweeny was particularly memorable.

The intimate space of the Burton Taylor theatre was split in two but the set lacked a keen attention to aesthetics. Lighting distinguished conversations carried out in the cluttered kitchen from those in the slick front of house. 

The second half saw a transformation in the set and a turn in events as the poker game played out. When executed well, the fast-paced passages of the game reached their peak as the stakes were upped, only to be brought down with flashes of bathos injected by Mugsy. Occasionally, timing was off and the performance lacked direction.

Dealer’s Choice is an engaging production with a wicked sense of humour. It had the audience in stitches and successfully handled the themes of power, manipulation and fate underpinned by a masculine obsession for the game of poker. It is a sure bet that we will see much more of Cook in future, since he dealt the audience a very good hand indeed. 

 

St Hugh’s ‘bomb’ destroyed in controlled explosions

0

The package after two controlled explosions

St Hugh’s College has been reopened after a bomb scare closed several buildings for 4 hours this afternoon.

Police sniffer dogs and a bomb disposal robot moved in to deal with the package, which looked like a car battery sized clear plastic box bound in tape, with wires taped to the side.

After two ‘pop’ tests and two controlled explosions, the device was made safe. It did not in fact contain explosives.

St Hugh’s said in a statement at 4.15pm:

“A package was found on college grounds this morning that, to be cautious, was treated as suspicious, but the police have confirmed that it is not an explosive device and poses no danger. As a precautionary measure certain college buildings had been evacuated, but the buildings are now operational again and the situation is returning to normal. We thank the police and we appreciate the calm response of everyone involved.”

The disruption caused panic among some finalists, who went to exam schools without their sub fusc. The college made efforts to help those with exams by ordering taxis and opening up offices so that finalists would have somewhere quiet to work.

Sounds of English Summer

0

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%7848%%[/mm-hide-text]

Image: Hobbes

Bomb scare at St Hugh’s

0

**Update – 16/06/13**

Thames Valley Police, investigating this incident since Wednesday, said this morning that “the package is not being treated as suspicious and the incident is closed.” A spokeswoman said “we cannot speculate why the package was left somewhere where it was mistaken as a threat.”

Police and St Hugh’s confirmed late on Wednesday that the package never posed any danger; today’s statement also plays down speculation of malicious intent.

St Hugh’s have also released a statement saying “there is no cause for concern,” without elaborating on what there is no cause to have been concerned by.

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%7849%%[/mm-hide-text]

Original article

Police and fire services have been called to St Hugh’s following the discovery of a “suspicious package”.

Large parts of the college have been cordoned off, and students evacuated, as a precuationary measure. A bomb disposal robot has now been seen entering the College grounds to deal with the suspect package, left outside the Maplethorpe Building in the centre of the grounds.

The Library, Kenyon and Wolfson buildings, as well as a number of houses on Woodstock Road have been evacuated.

A spokesperson for the college told Cherwell: ‘A suspect package was found on college grounds this morning and the police are dealing with the situation. As a precautionary measure we have taken this seriously and acted immediately to ensure people’s safety. Police and fire services were called and nearby buildings evacuated. When there is more information, we will provide it.’

William Golightly, a second year historian at St Hugh’s, told Cherwell: “At about 12.10pm I went out onto the lawns to play croquet with my friends. Suddenly I noticed several policemen appear on the lawns. For a minute I thought they were going to rugby tackle me, but they just shouted at us to ‘get back!’, and we evacuated elsewhere”.

In an email marked “Urgent”, the Academic registrar wrote:

“You may be aware that a suspect package is being investigated in College at the moment. A number of buildings have therefore been evacuated. If you have a University Examination this afternoon, and find yourself unable to return to your room to collect sub fusc, stationery etc, you should report to the College Office as soon as possible for advice.”

A member of staff said they suspected a hoax package rather than a genuine threat, but that the police attending were taking it serious as it looked very credible.

Thames Valley Police have released the following statement: “We were called at 11:32 am to St Hughs college after a member of staff reported a suspicious package on the lawn.”

The package was destroyed in two controlled explosions, which were accompanied by two ‘pop’ tests on site.

Thames Valley Police later released an updated statement saying: “There is no risk to the general public. College buildings have been evacuated, and a 100 metre radius has been cordoned off. Part of Woodstock Road is currently closed off  at this stage. It is likely to be closed off for some time. The Royal logistics corps are currently in attendance dealing with the situation.”

Responses on Twitter

@TPAdamsApparent bomb scare in St Hughs at the moment. Maplethorpe and Kenyon buildings evacuated.

@LadnyWilsonsuspicious package found on lawn. Bomb squad in attendance. Finalists not happy.

@moose_moose_Gmember of staff confirmed that a 2nd ‘controlled explosion’ will happen. Another hour at least before normality

@timrwilliams:Just heard what sounded like a controlled explosion from inside StHugh’s College, Oxford.

@janacahillhow big would the explosion have to be for a bomb-blast in St. Hugh’s to reach the rest of civilization?

Union Secretary resigns for "personal reasons"

0

Cai Wilshaw, who was elected unopposed to the position of Oxford Union Secretary, has decided not to take up his position for Michaelmas. The decision was made on the morning of Tuesday 11th June, and means that the member of standing committee with the highest number of votes in the last election, in this case Roberto Weeden-Sanz, succeeds Wilshaw as Secretary.

In a statement to the Cherwell, Wilshaw confirmed that he had declined the role. Wilshaw said: ‘For personal reasons, I will not be taking up the position of Secretary next term. I have had a brilliant time in the Union and have made some fantastic friends. I wish all the best to my successor and everyone else on committee in Michaelmas.’

Outgoing President Joey D’Urso confirmed Wilshaw’s departure, stating that ‘In accordance with Rule 38(a)ii and 38(f), Cai has decided not to take up the position of Secretary in Michaelmas.’

Rule 38(a)ii states that ‘Resignations from Office or from the Standing Committee must be sent simultaneously by email to the President and to any person next in line to succeed’, whilst Rule 38(f) confirms that, as Secretary-designate, die or resign then ‘his death or resignation shall be deemed, for the purposes of this Rule only, to have taken place immediately after his succession to Office.’

D’Urso went on to say that ‘[he] would like to thank him very much for his hard work on Standing Committee, especially the Eurovision party he organised and his excellent speech in the sixth week banking debate. Roberto Weeden-Sanz is next in the line of succession and has thus been offered the position of Secretary, which he has accepted. I am confident Roberto and the rest of next term’s committee will do a fantastic job.’

A post in the Facebook group ‘Overheard at Oxford Uni’ recently described this as ‘the dirtiest Union election in living memory’, and, in the aftermath, a series of thirteen tribunals were launched, all of which were subsequently withdrawn.

Oxford fails in "Green" League Table

0

A Green League Table of UK universities published by The Guardian placed Oxford 132nd in the country for environmental standards, dropping 13 places since last year. 143 higher education institutions were analysed in the ranking, which was topped by Manchester Metropolitan University, followed closely by Plymouth.  

The ranking, compiled by environmentalist website “People and Planet”, took into account factors such as Environmental Policy, Energy, Waste and Ethical Investment. Oxford was given a “fail” for its efforts across a whole range of these areas.

In particular, Oxford fared poorly in the “Ethical procurement and Fair Trade”, “Waste and Recycling” and “Carbon Emissions” categories. Stronger points included “Ethical Investment” and “Student and staff engagement”. In total, Oxford Scored 22 points out of 70. 

A spokesperson for the University told Cherwell, “Although the University’s performance in the ‘green league’ is disappointing, this ranking omits some key environmental benchmarks. One of these is transport, which we have long prioritised with successful results. Fewer than 20% of staff and 5% of students working in the city centre now drive to work. Unlike many universities we also have a water management strategy to reduce water consumption and we are also devising strategies for biodiversity and sustainable purchasing.” 

“Nonetheless we recognise there is a lot of work to be done and we are looking very carefully at our sustainability impacts, dedicating up to £14 million to carbon reduction projects and annual grants of £100,000 to sustainable transport initiatives as well as £100,000 to other sustainability initiatives.”

The University of Cambridge was ranked slightly above, at 113th, whilst London Business School and Heythrop College trailed at the bottom of the table. 

Madeleine-Ellis Pietersen, a Magdalen student who launched the Hog Roast Café last weekened in Hogacre Common, commented, “I find it quite striking how little environmental activism there is amongst the student body given how many amazing and pioneering eco-projects there are in Oxford. Having said that, incredible projects like the OxCoop and Oxgrow were started predominantly by students. “

“Lots of colleges are run in a hugely environmentally unfriendly way, and there is a reticence to be innovative — for example, despite huge grounds, Magdalen is hugely reticent to allocate land for student allotments, and the plots available are tiny.”

A slight change in the employment of methodology might account for Oxford’s drop in the League Table over recent years. People and Planet explain on their website that “The methodology for People & Planet Green League 2013 is developed in close consultation with key sectoral stakeholders and has evolved gradually over the seven years since its first publication”. Criteria such as independence, transparency and uniform metrics are highlighted as particular areas of importance in the development of methodology. 

A spokesperson for People and Planet told Cherwell: “Oxford has some catching up to do with the rest of the higher education sector, particularly in actual performance and the areas of carbon management, ethical procurement and staff and student engagement.”

“However, we’re hopeful that Oxford will be able to reverse this downward trend with the aid of Harriet Waters, the new Head of Sustainability at Oxford University, who comes from Oxford Brookes where she drove forward huge institutional changes in sustainability.”

Chris Garrard, a postgraduate student commented that “Oxford is a hub for student campaigning alongside research that is having a powerful influence on international development and the environment. The trouble is, this positive activity becomes rather tainted when the Vice-Chancellor and others at the top set a tone of profit before people, and deals before ethics. Deals such as the one agreed with Shell, represent a conscious choice to invest in a more unjust and potentially unstable world that the current students will inherit. That’s enough to justify a fail.”