Tuesday, May 6, 2025
Blog Page 1535

This is the way I live now

0

These last few months have seen me follow the quite remarkable journey of an old friend waiting desperately for a heart trans­plant. Will Pope is now 20 years old. I remember him clearly as a fresh-faced teenager: funny and immediately likeable, musically talented, and above all perfectly healthy. My most vivid memories are of his relentless guitar playing on the school bus which – despite being annoy­ingly good – was greeted with unanimous frus­tration by the number 854 faithful.

Will moved schools, at which point I sadly lost contact with him. However, my parents remained close with his and it was through them that I discovered the horrific news in March 2009 that Will – aged 16 – was suffering from catastrophic heart failure. His condition was thought to have been triggered by a vi­rus and was totally unexpected. Having com­plained of breathlessness and after visiting his doctor days earlier, Will had actually been sent home and told to pop back if he still felt unwell in a week or two. As his dad, Philip, put it, “‘Be­cause of his age and the fact he’d always been so healthy, I don’t think the doctor even con­sidered that he might be suffering from a con­dition normally seen in much older patients.” He was just extraordinarily unlucky.

It was the matron at Will’s school who first made the call to his mother Rosie, telling her that he needed to go to A&E immediately. After being rushed to hospital by ambulance and hav­ing his heart exam­ined, Rosie was told that Will was “very seriously” ill. In fact, one doctor lat­er noted he’d never seen anybody in that condition still able to walk.

Two days fol­lowing ad­mission, Will underwent open heart surgery in which a pump was inserted to sustain his blood flow and support his heart, allowing it to recover its function. To give some sense of the scale of the operation, the pump was driven by four batteries – each the size of VHS tape and weigh­ing considerably more – that had to be carried around in a bag at all times. The procedure was fortunately successful – in no small part due to the brilliant team at the Harefield Hospital. Combined with continued drug therapy, it al­lowed Will’s heart to recuperate sufficiently for the device to be removed later that year. Will and his family very much hoped that the worst was behind them; but in the long term, the prospect of a transplant always remained.

Will had dropped a year but went back and completed school, followed by his first year at Bristol University studying Classical Civilisa­tions. He kept fit, riding his bike around Bris­tol and rowing, and sang in a jazz band. He joined the Revunions, a Bristol comedy group. Life was good. Then, last summer, Will em­barked on the notoriously epic Mongol Rally; the stunning six week road trip from London to Ulaanbaatar that every slightly insane stu­dent – myself included – dreams of complet­ing. However, at the very end of the trip, Rosie received what must have been a terrifying call from her son, who, thousands of miles away, was feeling very ill. Will managed to make the long journey home and once again was imme­diately admitted to Harefield Hospital.

It was now clear beyond doubt that Will’s best option was a heart transplant. But in spite of being prioritised on the Urgent List, Will spent 122 days in hospital waiting for a do­nated heart, to no avail. This time was a deeply intense personal challenge for Will, as he laid bedbound, facing the agonisingly stark reality of his future without a transplant.

Yet, in a November documentary on ITV about Organ Donation, Will made a remark­able statement: “It’s a possibility that I won’t get a heart. It is a little bit terrifying, but at the same time I’ve managed to come to terms with the thought of loss, and that’s fine. I’ve made my peace with that. But for my fam­ily it’s very difficult.” Hearing someone my age calmly state that they are “at peace” with dying is something I found profoundly stirring. As Philip eloquently put it, “Will’s had to confront his mortality in a way most young people nev­er have to.”

These arduous months undoubtedly put immense strain on the Pope family, as they witnessed Will gradually weaken. Listening to his parents on the same programme made me realise how crippling powerlessness is on the psyche in such tragic scenarios. There is of course absolutely nothing you can do; only wait and hope that an appropriate heart becomes available. This is a bizarrely conflicting situation to find oneself in; as Rosie put it, “It is tragic that our son’s sur­vival depends on some­one else’s sad demise. But we would also feel incredibly grateful that our son had been given a second chance through someone else’s gen­erosity, because he has so much to offer.”

Eventually after waiting for two months, the surgeon told Will that he was “head­ing for a cliff.” His other organs were failing and he was now becoming too un­well to undergo a transplant. Some­thing needed to be done, and fast. A new­er, smaller pump had recently been tested and was proposed by the surgeon, in order to buy Will some time. But once he had the pump, he would no longer be on the urgent’ list, so the prospect of him getting a transplant would be greatly reduced. The operation was scheduled and performed, yet despite a long time trying, the pump failed to work properly. Another bout of surgery and another pump also failed. With Will extremely ill, the final decision was made to use a temporary external pump in the hope he’d recover enough to allow a transplant. But this would be if – and only if – a heart became available. Christmas Day was spent in hospital. This was an excruciating phase to watch at a distance; one can barely begin to imagine the stress placed upon Will and his family during this time.

Then, on New Year’s Eve, Will’s family were told that a heart had been found; it was time. The window for using a donated organ is des­perately short; not much longer than three hours. It’s amazing that any successful trans­plants are performed at all. After an extremely complicated operation and ten days spent un­conscious, Will woke to discover he had a new heart.

One in five people on the transplant list die waiting for organs. A recent survey suggests 70 per cent of us would accept a transplant – un­surprisingly so – yet roughly 60 per cent have not put themselves on the organ register. This raises the question, “if we’re prepared to receive an organ for ourselves or a loved one, then why are we not prepared to donate one?”

Writing this account has one very simple purpose: to make more people consider or­gan donation. It’s been absolutely terrifying watching someone I know – someone young, fit and healthy – be struck down and almost die, completely out of the blue. By contrast, how­ever, I have found it indescribably uplifting to watch this same person emerge from the very depths of illness because of the amazing gift of a donated heart. More so, I have found it truly inspiring to observe Will’s family con­duct themselves with such grace and courage throughout a time of utter desperation. They have campaigned tirelessly to promote aware­ness for Will and others like him, showing that simply signing the Organ Register can save someone’s life.

This is not a case of greedily desiring some­one else’s demise. I know for a fact that families on the receiving end of a donation find it both confusing and saddening to know the cost at which it has come, especially considering their conflicting joy at its arrival. This is a mat­ter of offering your organs as a free gift in the unfortunate circumstance of your own death. You won’t be using them any more. So what a wonderful blessing it would be to maybe spare another person’s life: as one life extinguishes, another can be reborn.

Statistics suggest that roughly 90 per cent of people are happy with the idea of organ dona­tion, but only 30 per cent actually sign up. This is absurd. Around 1000 people die every year waiting hopelessly for a transplant; but many of them could be saved.

It really is unbelievably easy to register – just pop on the Register link below, and you’ll be done in five minutes. And if you do so, please remember one thing: tell your family. Approxi­mately 40 per cent of families refuse permis­sion for their loved one’s organs to be used even if they are already on the register.

Will was very lucky to receive a heart trans­plant; he had very little time left. His post-op­eration journey to recovery has been fraught with serious complications; a telling reminder of just how desperate his condition was prior to the transplant, because of his long wait. He suffered a life-threatening cardiac arrest and for weeks his motor nervous system shut down, leaving him totally paralysed. He was trapped, unable to communicate, connected to a ventilator and unable to move. This must have been terrifying. Having been critically ill and sedated for so long, Will has “neuropa­thy,” meaning that he now has to re-learn how to move his muscles. He is incredibly thin and weak, a mere shadow of his former self.

Slowly but surely, Will is on the mend. He has a long and difficult road to recovery ahead of him, but each day, his strength grows. He recently made a huge breakthrough; for the first time since the operation six weeks ago, he walked with an aide. Yet undoubtedly, the best news of all is that he now has hope for a future life.

Will appeared in the ITV documentaries “Waiting for a Heart” and “From the Heart”, the focused on his story and the current sad state of organ donation in the UK. Will and his family agreed to participate in these programmes in order to raise awareness for organ donation. His friends at Bristol have been campaigning for Will and others in position.

As a result of this campaigning over the course of just a few months, the number of registrations has almost doubled in a year. The aim of the campaign is to make organ donation normal, so that others in Will’s position can have that second chance. It would be fantastic to help them make a real difference. Whilst still very weak in bed, Will was asked to describe what it feels like to have a new heart. Slowly and quietly, yet full of purpose, Will responded, “it feels better than anything in the world. I didn’t know I’d had it for ten days after the operation and then it came as such a shock, in such a good way. I can’t wait to go home and sit by the fire and have homemade food and see my brothers…and be normal”. He was asked what he’d say to the family of the donor of his heart: “I’d like to say thank you so much- its such a wonderful gift and you have no idea how much it means to me. And that anyone could be so generous is fantastic”.

Follow Will’s progress on www.willpope.co.uk and on YouTube.

Become a doner yourself, at www.organdonation.

Preview: Phèdre

0

Cherwell’s verdict: “drawn-out drama of trauma and death”

In the strikingly dramatic atmosphere of Merton College chapel, Jean Racine’s Phèdre is to be played out (in translation) next week. The script is highly stylised and comes across as a mixture of Greek tragedy and Shakespeare; a tricky combination pulled off by the majority of the cast with style with only the occasional slip into modern intonation in the more highly-wrung phrases, (a slightly wooden declaration at one point that “such unexpected terrors choke my soul” seemed delightfully comic more than anything).

The director successfully exploits the stark bareness of the chapel as an acting space so that the only props are two wooden chairs and a table: the audience sit either side of the actors creating an intimate atmosphere which works well to balance the overtly formalised acting style. At one point the young lovers Hippolytus (Hugh Johnson) and Aricia (Clara-Laeila Laudette) play out a love scene up in the organ box. This proved extremely effective in bringing to mind a Romeo-and-Juliet-esque balcony scene, although the less flexible members of the audience should be advised to sit as far away as possible to save them from the possibility of neck injuries obtained from craning up at strange angles.

The heroine herself, Phèdre, is played by the beautiful and youthful Bridget Dru, a far cry from our conception of an old and twisted step-mother (although admittedly incestuous love didn’t quite make it into most of our childhood renditions of Cinderella and Snow White). The result is a quasi-maternal relationship between Phèdre and Oenone the ‘nurse’ (Grace Brockway), and an audience that is much more likely to turn away from the brilliantly stubborn and narrow-minded King Theseus (Jonathon Oakman) to sympathise with his inherently traumatised wife.

The only quibble that springs to mind as I watch this play is that, in the depths of a freezing chapel, the tendency for elongated speeches becomes a test of our concentration as well as our circulation. However clearly this is a fault of a speech rather than the casts who deliver the lines well, apart from an occasional lack of the utter articulatedness which is required in the echoing chapel from Theseus. But fear not – I am later informed that there will be heating! Perhaps bring eskimo suits just in case… and brace yourself for some intense but well-acted tragedy. 

Focus on… Oxford Acapella

0

The Oxford a cappella scene is one of the oldest and most developed in the country – and so even if the idea of a bunch of well tuned and ferociously cheerful young men and/or women slamming out a mashup of Katy Perry hits is your idea of hell, it’s unlikely that you will have been able to avoid it. With the jazz-fuelled Oxford Gargoyles recently making it onto BBC Choir of the  Year and all-male sensation Out Of The Blue gracing the semi-finals of Britain’s Got Talent back in 2011, it seems that a cappella in Oxford is going strong and here to stay. Its strength is due not only the abundance of musically minded and vocally-acrobatic participants, but also to the spirit of friendly competition between the groups which comes to a head at the end of Hilary as the ‘Voice Festival UK’, affectionately termed ‘V-FUK’, arrives in town. For the uninitiated, V-FUK is as close as it gets to Glee, with regional rounds pitting local groups against each other before the cream of the crop head to London to compete in the national final. I had the privilege of being welcomed into a rehearsal with Oxford’s oldest group, the mixed-voice Alternotives, to find out how they were preparing for the a cappella event of the term.

Witnessing an a cappella rehearsal from the outside is an experience like no other; the buzz-words, injokes and “technical” terms come thick and fast and there is a lot of debate and collaboration. It would perhaps be cruel of me to repeat all the best quotes from this rehearsal verbatim, but a few favourites include “No, it’s Italian vowels for this one”; “And when the sopranos come in, they can just be… you know… ethereal”; and finally, whilst Musical Director  Jessie and song arranger Slade make a final few edits to their opening song, “Oh no, they just cut the bit we can sing”.

Despite the rigours of their preparation, the Alts still found time for some one-on-one chats. Group veteran Dom Burrell, now in his third year of a cappella, gave an insight into his time in the group: “It’s changed a lot in three years, and I’ve been lucky to be a part of that.” The Alts have definitely branched out in recent years. When I first saw them they were clad in “black with a splash” and had a sort of geek chic charm. Last year they jetted off to the USA in their now signature hand-dyed purple, and they’ve developed a gutsy, soul-tinged sound without losing their sense of fun and comedy which sets them apart from the rest of the Oxford crowd. Dom’s attitude to voice festival is pragmatic but optimistic: the group as a whole, he says, is looking forward to having three songs perfected and also seeing the others at the top of their  game.

On the whole, the group seems reluctant to rate their chances in the coming competition, but the atmosphere at the end of the rehearsal was definitely one of quiet confidence – and rightly so. When asked for one word to sum up how they were feeling about the impending challenge, answers ranged from “pumped” to “intrigued”.

Ed Crawford, however, who will deliver the solo for the set finale, was unable to confine his feelings to one word. Tasked with delivering the sexy, seductive ‘Can’t Take My Eyes Off Of You’, his thoughts on the challenge he faces to help propel his group to success were concluded thus: “I hope there is a female judge… or at least a gay man.”

The alts set promises to be musically impressive, wittily delivered, beautifully sung and of course outrageously flirtatious. You won’t want to miss them. They take to the stage this Sunday in the Oxford Town Hall.

Fear of Flipping Burgers

After studying at Keble from 2006-09, Barney Norris returns to the Burton Taylor and Oxford in 9th week with his touring play Fear of Music. Now working for a professional company, Norris’s interest in drama was ignited by the Keble O’Reilly, which he believes is a great opportunity for Oxford students. “It allows you to programme a space 20 years before you’d usually get the opportunity to do so, as well as being a place where you can take full creative control.”

Despite being threatened with removal from the university for poor academic performance, Norris was already writing plays during his degree, including Fear of Music. It was during his tenure as Drama Officer in 2010 that the first reading of this play was performed at the Playhouse, but Norris himself admits, “It was not very good; more of an interesting relationship between two boys than a story. But I continued to improve it.” 

Fear of Music has been a long-term project for Norris, his initial exploration into the relationship between two boys later developing into a plot about two brothers, one of whom is leaving in the near future to go to university and trying to prevent his younger brother from joining the army like their absent father. Norris included the army in Fear of Music after seeing an MoD advertising campaign with the slogan, “I want to do more with my life than flip burgers.” He says, “It seemed pretty rough to me because the army marketing department targets areas of least social engagement, where people are unlikely to find great jobs. It belittles people into joining the armed forces.”

The play is set in 1988 Andover, chosen because of its many parallels with today. “Just like then, education’s getting more expensive, jobs are getting harder to get hold of, benefits are being cut, and social isolation for those not born into happy, middle-class families is a big problem. Most theatre now is boringly irrelevant as it is about people who own their own flats at 25. We’re in a middle ground which nearly everybody inhabits but isn’t talked about – where people are fine but when political waves wash over them their lives change.” 

The most important topic the play deals with is social isolation. “We make ourselves lonely through a need for security – isolation is safe. There’s nothing to disrupt you on an island. The need to connect with another person requires, at some point, overcoming shyness. In Fear of Music, they can’t speak about their dad, they can’t speak about their mum, and they can’t even talk to each other. 

And then one of them has got to leave as he’s got a place at university, and that is what the play is. Most of us live our lives feeling shy and insecure. These brothers are people who want to engage with life and music, but can’t quite.”

Norris goes on, “I hope people can connect with it in the same way I do with good theatre. It is a room which I am able to go into, and if it is a good play I feel the need to call someone. When I enter, I am quiet for an hour and consequently I can engage with my own life through the medium of someone else’s. That is it.”

Preview: Eight

0

If someone had chanced by the room where Eight’s press preview was taking place and peered through the windows, they would have seen a very puzzling scene – five people paying rapt attention to a single actor, unadorned, in the centre of a nondescript room. I had the pleasure of being inside that room,
and knowing what all the fuss was about. Eight combines a brilliant script,  ambitious directorial pair, and a crack team of first-class performers. Even in its present infancy, it could take to the stage tomorrow and put on a hell of a show.

The focus of this inspired piece is crisis, and directors Jessica Lazar and  Tommo Fowler have designed their production to bring out the universality
of panic. A total of eight monologues make up the play, with the script flitting between different locales and personalities: from the brash American Wall Street asshole who is the sole survivor of a London bomb blast, to the Scottish mother who cannot afford to give her children a memorable Christmas. The five night run will be split into halves – four of the monologues will take place on the first two nights, and the other two nights will showcase
the other half of the show.

Audience votes will dictate the four speeches that make it to the final night. Lazar and Fowler have assured me that the monologues will be carefully arranged for thematic purposes, and if the preview is to be any indication, their curative decisions are something to look forward to. Convincing accents add to the work’s global feel, and Hickson’s writing zooms from place to place with remarkable confidence and precision – when Miles (David Shields) talks about the snack stand at Kings’ Cross station, I thought of the time I bought cigarettes from that exact shop, and when Bobby (Phoebe Hames) describes a plush Christmas party, I could’ve sworn the room got noticeably warmer. Assured directorial hands milk a preternaturally accomplished script for all it is worth.

Monologue-driven performances are difficult because they give actors so little to work with, but I have full confidence that the cast will be able to spin straw into gold come opening night. The odds were stacked against them in this press preview: both actors were not off book, and to make things worse, the Worcester college geese were having a noisy and raucous party outside the room. The moment that Hames let loose her character’s energetic Scottish brogue, however, I instantly forgot all those distractions. Shields is just as good, keeping up a quintessential American brashness while subtly showing the cracks in his character’s traumatised psyche. Both actors possess a powerful magnetism that works well with the script’s uncomfortable intensity; it was difficult to watch them perform, but it was downright impossible to look away.

Any criticism I can make can be put down to minor instances of a lack of polish, wholly understandable for a preview held this early. For example, Shields’ relentless manic energy is every bit the coked-up banker, but he could vary it a bit more to suit the complexity of his character. I have complete confidence, however, that Lazar and Fowler will tweak every detail until they are satisfied. This is already a work that leaves most student productions in the dust. I’ll be making the trip to see Eight, and you’d be a fool not to do likewise.

Criticism of Castle Mill development continues

0

Criticism has continued regarding the Castle Mill development in Jericho, a complex of graduate accommodation for Oxford University students.

Members of the Campaign to Protect Port Meadow from Oxford University (CPPMOU) condemned the lack of response to letters sent to the University, in an open letter published in the Oxford Mail last Thursday.

Toby Porter, a representative of the CPPMOU, claimed, “The campaign has grown in strength due to people’s dismay at the buildings, but also an implacable anger at how the University and City Council managed to between them so mismanage the consultation process that it is almost impossible to find anyone who was aware of the proposed development at a time when the consultation process was open and complaints could still be made.”

The University’s position on the Castle Mill development has also been criticised by Professor Diarmaid MacCulloch, fellow of St Cross College, who alleged, “The total silence from any senior representative of the University above the level of a hapless and relatively junior employee in the University Press Office is very telling: everyone knows that the buildings are a ghastly error.”

MacCulloch also claimed, “I have had a significant number of very senior members of the University privately support me and say that they would like to express their horror at the scheme, but are constrained by the offices that they hold.”

In a statement to Cherwell, an Oxford University spokesperson commented, “It is absolutely not the case that holding a university position prevents University members from expressing their views on these matters – they are free to say whatever they feel, as shown by Professor McCulloch’s comments, and the University values open and free discussion among its members.”

She added, “Concerns about the view of the buildings from Port Meadow have been and continue to be reflected in discussions with planning officers. We have already met planning officers for the first of what will probably be several conversations and we do not have anything further to add until these discussions have been concluded.”

OUSU has also become implicated in the debate. OUSU Vice-President for Graduates Christopher Gray’s view on the development of graduate accommodation near Port Meadow was quoted in last week’s Cherwell. He commented, “We understand the concerns over the aesthetic effect on the view from Port Meadow, but the time to raise them has unfortunately passed.”

In an open letter addressed to Gray, Stephen Ross, a graduate student at St John’s College, criticised Gray’s comments and alleged, “The time to raise these concerns has not passed — the plans for this development were approved in secret, with no real consultation with the community on which they will have such a large impact.”

Gray clarified his position in an open reply to Ross where he claimed, “This does not mean that I, or OUSU, necessarily oppose the objectives of your campaign, it simply means that based on the feedback we have had so far we cannot reasonably devote time to it over other campaigns such as those for graduate funding, better quality Masters courses, or the Living Wage.”

Gray added, “In no way have I ever intended to ‘silence dissenting voices’ nor to stifle any kind of debate. I spend much of my time in this role speaking to graduate students and their representatives, encouraging them to raise the issues that they care about and campaign on them.”

University blocks Google docs to fight phishing

0

There has been a rise in the number of phishing emails sent to Oxford students’ accounts, causing the University to temporarily block Google Docs.

Disabling Google Docs, a website for storing documents online, was a measure taken to prevent emails which appear to be from University officials. Students are increasingly targeted by hackers seeking their account details as university accounts can be used to send spam emails and appear legitimate.

In a blog post on their website, OxCERT (Oxford University Computing Service) explained the decision to block Google Docs, saying, “Over the past few weeks there has been a marked increase in phishing activity against our users. Now, we may be home to some of the brightest minds in the nation. Unfortunately, their expertise in their chosen academic field does not necessarily make them an expert in dealing with such mundane matters as emails…It only takes a small proportion to respond for the attacks to be worthwhile.”

The blog post continued, “Almost all the recent attacks have used Google Docs URLs…We considered these to be exceptional circumstances and felt that the impact on legitimate University business by temporarily suspending access to Google Docs was outweighed by the risks to University business by not taking such action.”

A Google spokesperson defended Google Docs, telling Cherwell, “Google actively works to protect our users from phishing attempts. Using Google Docs, or any of our products, for distribution or coordination of phishing is a violation of our product policies, and we will remove any forms or disable accounts discovered to be used for these purposes.”

Phishing through Google Docs is part of a wider increase in the practise within the University. In an email to Oxford students, Professor Paul Jeffreys, Oxford’s Director of IT Risk Management, warned, “You may recently have received fraudulent emails asking you to visit a website to supply your username and password, or requesting that you send them by email…There have been a very large number of such emails sent recently…Don’t be tricked into handing over your password as a result of these emails.”

Several undergraduates received phishing emails last week which claimed, “You will be unable to send and receive mails and your email account will be deleted from our server. To avoid this problem, you are advised to verify your email account by filling this maunal [sic.] information.” A link to a Google Doc for student usernames followed.

The amount of other spam emails reaching Oxford students has also increased. Undergraduates have received three emails from the websites ‘Lashzone’ and ‘Lashxone’, with the most recent being sent on Saturday 23rd February. Their website states, “We offer professional assistance on post-secondary homework, assignments, essays, lab reports, assignment revision…etc. You get the idea?”

A University spokesperson commented, “While Oxford University has extensive anti-spam defences in place, spammers are constantly adapting their tactics to evade our countermeasures.  IT Services have to balance the risks of spam attacks against the risks of disruption to legitimate email traffic.  Unfortunately this means that it is inevitable that some spam will get through the defences – this particular set of messages was just one of hundreds of spam runs that hit the University each day, and often many runs come from the same source.”

Regarding emails from Lashzone, the university stated, “IT Services have been in contact with the Proctors’ Office regarding the mails from Lashzone.  We are satisfied that reasonable technical countermeasures are in place, but these are continually reviewed in view of evolving threats.”

When pressed about criticism from universities, a Lashzone spokesperson commented, “We smile and walk on.” 

LMH tutor in Lib Dem harassment claims

0

Alison Smith, a Politics tutor at Lady Margaret Hall, is among one of a number of women who have spoken out against Lord Christopher Rennard in the latest sexual scandal to shake the country. Lord Rennard, former Liberal Democrat chief executive and currently a peer in the House of Lords, has been accused by various women of sexual harassment in a programme broadcast by Channel 4 news last week. 

Smith alleged in the programme that Lord Rennard had inappropriately touched her and a friend at a party six years ago at the peer’s home. She claims to have reported the incident to senior members of the party came to no avail. In particular, Rennard has been accused of taking advantage of his position of power in order to approach young women at training events for female political candidates. 

Citing one of her reasons for making her allegations public, Smith told Cherwell, “We had to think of the safety of future generations of women entering politics. I felt this very keenly as a politics lecturer, because some of the talented young women that I teach will hopefully stand for public office in the future, and they could find themselves at such events within a few years”.

The allegations, made by several women, refer to events which took place between five and ten years ago. They were reportedly brought up with senior Party leaders, including Paul Burstow, the Lib Dem Chief Whip, and the equalities spokesman Jo Swinson, now Minister for Women and Equalities. One woman claimed that when she informed senior party members about Lord Rennard’s advances on her, “they openly laughed and thought it was hilarious.”

The Liberal Democrat Party has launched two investigations into the allegations of sexual harassment, and how the party has dealt with these allegations in the past. In an interview with the BBC, Vince Cable insisted that these investigations will have an “independent element”, and denied that he or Nick Clegg had any knowledge of the allegations before they were made public. 

Speaking to Cherwell, Smith insisted, “We need to change the culture where people are prepared to turn a blind eye to such damaging behaviour. The ‘Rennard Issue’ is the main reason why the Liberal Democrats have one of the lowest percentages of female MPs of any mainstream political party in any Western democracy.  Hopefully that culture will now change.”

In a statement released on Sunday, the Lib Dem leader Nick Clegg maintained that “the allegations made on Channel 4 concerning Lord Rennard last Thursday were extremely serious and distressing to the women involved. It is critical they are investigated thoroughly and dealt with properly and they will be. In the meantime, I will not stand by and allow my party to be subject to a show trial of innuendo, half-truths and slurs. The important thing is that we respect the women who have come forward and do everything to get to the truth.”

Lord Rennard has announced that he will step down from his position in the Liberal Democrat group in the House of Lords, and has resigned from the Federal Policy Committee, the body in charge of writing party manifestos. Lord Rennard’s lawyers dismissed the allegations as a “total distortion of his character”, adding, “Not a single complaint of misconduct was made against him to his knowledge during the 27 years he worked for the Liberal Democrat party. Despite the claim made by one woman in the report, Lord Rennard continued working closely with her for 10 years after the alleged event described.”

Georgia Luscombe, Female Welfare Officer at Lady Margaret Hall, told Cherwell, “Allegations of sexual harassment against women in Parliament, particularly those in a subordinate role to their male counterparts and thus more vulnerable to exploitation, should be taken extremely seriously. Failure to do so would be damaging both to political parties’ reputation but also to women’s political aspirations.”

Magdalen student Elizabeth Brierley said, “In their own Constitution, the Liberal Democrats reject discrimination of any sort and ‘oppose all forms of entrenched privilege and inequality’, but this most recent scandal has shown that even the Liberal Democratic party tolerates misogyny. By covering up the situation and not dealing with the claims of abuse as they were made, the Lib Dem party has reinforced the prevalent male view that sexual abuse, and allegations thereof, are trivial. Furthermore, what has made this situation all the more tragic is that one of the women involved has said that she didn’t make a formal complaint because she didn’t want “any fuss”. It seems to me that it will only be when allegations of sexual abuse are no longer seen as a waste of time and a bit of a joke, that we might then be able to strive for real equality.”

“Fairer” pricing for Trinity rooms

0

Trinity College has announced in the last week their intentions to change their current accommodation system to introduce differential room pricing.

Currently, all rooms are the same price, regardless of size, location, en-suite or any other divergent factors. The College have now decided to introduce a more “fair” system, which colleges such as Exeter College employ, whereby rooms are priced on the basis of their individual merits. This would give students the opportunity to choose, to some extent, what facilities they want by deciding how much they are willing to pay.

JCR President, Andy Butler, sent around an email to students, stating, “The good news is that I have received confirmation that this change will make no difference to current students. So the first year housing ballot remains the same and you will all receive a flat rate.”

Currently this flat rate is £1,256.54 per term, but the College want to change this to offer a choice to students from lower income families. Although they will almost certainly introduce differential pricing, the final figures and bands have not yet been announced.

A general meeting was called on Monday 18th February where a resultant survey was held for all students to share their opinions on the room pricing issue. Butler told Cherwell, “Of the 139 students that answered the survey, 72% were against differential pricing, 22% were for it and 6% didn’t know.

“An even larger amount (77% of students) felt that differential pricing would cause social segregation. However, 19% of students said their financial situation would be significantly improved by differential pricing, which is quite a notable proportion.”

The survey asked for students’ thoughts on the principal of differential pricing, what gap should be enforced between highest and lowest priced rooms, what ideal features should determine the pricing, whether their own financial situation would be aided by differential pricing and what they thought about the prospect of “ghettoisation” caused by rich students in one block and poorer ones in another.

Estates Bursar Kevin Knott informed Cherwell that the issue of introducing differential pricing has been an ongoing process with the student body and that the College had had a presentation from the student governing body last February.

Nevertheless, the belief that the College has acted without the student body’s consent has caused some controversy within the College. Butler commented, “Most disappointing to the student body is the lack of consultation before this policy was implemented. It was discussed in the reserved section of the college’s governing body meeting which sees the JCR and MCR Presidents leave the room.

“Although the student body has been consulted in the previous two years about differential pricing (which measured 74% against two years ago and 68% against last year), this year’s student body and JCR committee were not consulted.”

Nevertheless, Butler agreed that the Estates Bursar had been forthcoming in listening to the students when the practicalities of room pricing and its implementation had been discussed.

Knott told Cherwell that the College were “not entirely clear” as to why the students did not support room pricing. He said, “The College has, for many years, charged differential rents on its outside properties. Given the variety of accommodation on the main site and the desirability of giving students the choice as to how they spend their funds, whether on accommodation or otherwise, the same approach is being adopted for the main Broad Street site.”

The implementation of this new approach is currently being settled with the student body.

Hertford drainage sewage overflows

0

‘Finalists Fling’ at Hertford had to be cancelled hours before it was due to take place onTuesday, after the drainage system under the college overflowed, forcing sewage into the  kitchen.

The black tie dinner, designed for Finalists to enjoy a stress-free evening before the ‘onslaught’ of exams, has been postponed until next week, following a decision by the Home Bursar to close the kitchen until it had been professionally cleaned.

The JCR Secretary sent out an urgent email to students which read, “I am incredibly sorry to report that I have just been called into a meeting with the home bursar and the head of catering who have told me that Finalists fling tonight will have to be CANCELLED.”

“Apparently the drainage system under college has overflowed forcing sewage into the kitchen, and Beau [the Home Bursar] has made the Health and Safety decision that the kitchen cannot be used until it has been professionally cleaned. I have provisionally rearranged it for NEXT TUESDAY. Beau has said he will talk to the bursar about getting us free wine for the rearranged fling to apologise for this catastrophe.”

It was later confirmed that, to compense for the cancelled dinner, attendees at the rescheduled event will be given half a bottle of wine each.

The ‘@whatisinhall’ Twitter account later tweeted, “For those of you who haven’t heard, Finalist’s Fling has been cancelled due to flooded drains in the kitchens.”

Students were able to observe through the kitchen windows that the floor was indeed awash.

Andy Turner, a third-year mathmetician who organised the dinner, told Cherwell, “Finalists Fling being cancelled was a real waste. The whole mishap was a huge drain on everyone’s time and enthusiasm.”

“The incident stinks of a conspiracy planned by the college’s main rival in food provision, the ATS. The meal has been rearranged to next week, when hopefully the funnel continue unabated, with the addition of complementary wine flushing any hopes of a quiet night down the toilet,” Turner explained.

Some students questioned when the incident had occurred. Third-year historian Callum Pirie joked, “We were beginning to wonder why the food had started tasting funny. We thought it was the horsemeat.”

In an email to Turner which was posted on the JCR Facebook group, Hertford’s catering manager addressed students’ concerns: “Please let me assure you that lunch today was not affected, and all food was prepared and cooked before the problem in the kitchen began. The council are currently working on the drains, and a professional deep clean company are due to clean the kitchen this evening. Meaning that service should resume to normal starting with breakfast tomorrow morning.”

Later in the evening, the kitchen was successfully cleaned, with college hall reopening the next day.

A third year engineer, Tom Oakley, sought to make the best of the postponement. “My Mother always taught me that when the kitchen’s knee-deep in shit, you’ve got to cancel dinner – so although I was disappointed, I entirely understood Hertford’s decision. I managed to stave off disappointment by making a delicious dinner of pan-fried duck breasts with raspberry sauce, baby leaf salad and sautéed carrots. And then I went to the pub.”

However, not all students were able to see the funny side of the situation. Third-year mathematician Adrian Clayton told Cherwell, “it’s too traumatic an incident for me to think up any sewage based puns.”