Blog Page 1565

Debate: Should Universities Fingerprint Foreign Students?

0

Robert Walmsley: No 

Let us be honest, taking the fingerprints of all overseas students, at a university, is clearly a dubious thing to do. It is uncomfortable, because the working assumption behind it seems to be that all foreign students want to abuse the student visa system and it is only by closely monitoring them that we prevent them from doing so.

In reality, the vast majority of foreign students are perfectly legitimate. The reason they are here is to get a good education and nothing more.  International students enrich British universities both financially and culturally and are often well-integrated into the university community.

Catching out ‘fake’ foreign students, by whether they attend lectures, does not seem a particularly cunning plan either. Like all students, foreign students are just as capable at oversleeping and missing lectures. Except now, the consequence of missing a few of your lectures, at certain universities, is that you are suspected of being an illegal immigrant.

The issue is not whether more efforts need to be made to stop illegal immigrants using student visas, but whether this is an efficient way of doing so. There seem to be far more intelligent ways of distinguishing the bogus students from the legitimate ones, without stigmatising all overseas students. For example, in the first place, determining whether overseas students are capable of paying for or have a loan in place, to pay their fees, seems a much better way of separating the legitimate students from the illegitimate ones.

It is estimated foreign students contribute up to £8bn, directly and indirectly, to the economy each year. Overseas students, in the UK, pay as much as £35,000 in fees per year to study here. The fees, which foreign students pay, are also used to subsidise the teaching of domestic students. Furthermore, this monetary valuation of foreign students does not account for the social benefits they bring to our universities and the friendships British students form with them.

Discouraging international student from attending UK universities, when so many universities are facing a substantial funding gap seems like an obviously bad idea. So, why then are universities introducing these checks? It seems that the reason is pressure from the government. The UK Border Agency has consistently failed to distinguish between bogus and legitimate foreign students, with 100,000 overseas students suspected of using the education system to get into the country last year. Consequently, the task is now being ushered upon education institutions to do this themselves and so foreign students are being subjected to more tests, as a result.  In addition, there has been a perverse incentive for the government to reduce the number of overseas students ever since it, rather stupidly, decided to include international students in its immigration cap.

The fundamental problem with measures like this is that they do not only discourage false foreign students, they discourage all foreign students, from coming to study in the UK. Most universities, including Oxford, will hopefully recognise this and conclude that fingerprinting international students is simply inappropriate.

Jack Chisnall: Yes 

There’s nothing that gets the alarming bells ringing quite like the association of the words “restrictive measures” and “foreign students”, but I think it’s important to be pragmatic as much as it to be idealistic. It’s all very well talking, with dreamy-eyed sobriety, about the sacrosanctity of ‘education’, and how a fingerprinting system is a gross overreaction to a minor problem, but ultimately, this is a question of the laws we set for ourselves, and whether or not we are going to abide by them.

Let’s make it absolutely clear, of course, that of the 300,000 internationals given student visas by the EU, a majority work hard, and more than justify their right to study in the UK. For many universities, their £2.5billion contribution in tuition fees is invaluable, but has this bred a system which allows fraudulent students to ignore their studies, and find work instead?

We have to answer this rather uncomfortable question with statistics, instead of some unfounded stereotype about international students. There were reported last year some 106,000 cases, by colleges, of bogus students, clearly not using their visa for academic study, but in order to work and live. Of this number, very few are even pursued by the relevant authorities, and in all, 0.14% of cases lead to deportation. I’m no flag-waving patriot, attempting to scaremonger – I would simply point out that there’s an obvious juxtaposition here. If so little of these cases are even considered, what is the point in the first place of a notification system which allows colleges to alert the government of people potentially abusing the immigration system?

There’s a squeamishness around this issue – and quite rightly. If anything, it’s gratifying that information which portrays international students in a negative light inspires in us a kind of careful criticism. But is this now bordering on hypersensitivity? Last year, London Metropolitan University was controversially stripped of its right to sponsor international students after it was revealed that a substantial amount of this number did not attend any teaching seminars, such as tutorials or lectures, and couldn’t speak English in a practical way. 2,600 students already at the university were threatened with deportation. Of course, people who argued that this was damaging to the UK’s reputation for welcoming international students had a valid point. There may indeed be a need for taking a pinch of salt given how valuable international students are to this country – but again, wouldn’t this kind of apathy undermine the British system of law? We either abide by our laws, or we change them.

Whether or not the University of Sunderland’s decision to introduce fingerprint identification is a piece of appalling discrimination depends upon these laws. It seems slightly ridiculous to question why it is only foreign students who are checked, given that this is the purpose of any form of border control. It certainly isn’t a polemic against foreign people. The only way to settle this argument however, is to see whether all these regulations detrimentally affect the UK in terms of foreign applicants, and that is something only time can tell.

Oxford triathlete has big plans

0

You probably didn’t notice, but some of you at least have been sharing lectures with one of the best young triathletes in the world. Of course it is easy to say that, but then it isn’t easy to finish tenth in the World Junior Championships — held recently in London — or to win German National Junior Champion- ships. It’s not so much a walk in the park as a brisk swim, cycle, and run, but St. Catz’ very own Sophia Saller has been making her mark on the world stage, and it was a massive privilege to ask her a few questions about her recent achievements.

We began, as you’d imagine, by chatting about her London success. Sophia talked of often feeling like “the lone one left training” in preparation for the event, but went on to say that “it is crazy how much motivation you get from being given the chance to race on a world stage in front of your friends and family!” I asked her about how she had mentally prepared for competing on such a big stage, and her response said much about how despite the fact that “there was no real pressure on me” she was a woman on something of a mission.

She said “It took a while to sink in that I would be racing ‘at home’ in my first World champs!” And went on to add that going into the race “I knew that I was in great shape and just wanted to go out there and do as well as I can, to make all the training worth it. The event itself was quite special to me — having volunteered at the Olympics there a year ago. So I was massively excited to race, but feeling “at home” and calm at the same time.

“The race itself was amazing, I often heard friends by the course cheering me on — despite the horrendous English weather!” 

Of course being an Oxonian leaves little time to relax, but Saller was able to take a short holiday before coming up and she said that it “gave me the chance to just chill for a while before my “normal life” kicked in again.” To talk about this “normal life” finds Sophia at her most elo- quent; she said that “coming back to Oxford always brings me back to reality and makes sure that I don’t forget that you’re not going to get anywhere if you don’t work for it.”

For me the idea of getting up for lectures full stop is somewhat daunting, but Saller’s work ethic makes a mockery of mine as she tells me, on balancing training and studying, that “I do Maths – which means there’s no time I have to spend in a lab and I can work whenever I can/ need to. That might mean that I come back from training in the morning and sit on my desk and work while eating my breakfast — there’s a lot one can do in a day if the time is filled in efficiently.”

We then moved to discuss the idea of nationality. At the minute the issue is very topi-cal, with naturalisation debates wherever you look, but there was no such confusion in this case as Sophia was born and spent most of her childhood in Germany. She does talk of a great affection for Britain though. 

“In my room at uni, I used to have a GB rug on the floor and a German flag on the wall – in Germany I’m called the Brit and here I’m the German. So I’ve given up on deciding which na- tion I should cheer for in sporting events and just go for both — which makes it slightly awkward sometimes when there is a Brit racing a German.”

I’d always wondered how one became involved with something as niche as triathlon, but Sophia’s answer made a lot of sense.

”I got slightly bored of just swimming up and down a pool (‘counting tiles’ as some people like to call it) so I tried out an Aquathlon (a swim followed by a run) and loved it. After a few more of them, I had qualified for the London Regional Team for the British Youth Triathlon Championships three years ago — never having ridden a bike before.”

However it’s not all about the elite level, as Saller makes clear how much she appreciates the Oxford sporting infrastructure, as “train- ing with people makes it easier to get up early and train in winter or run/cycle in the rain and cold.” While she was passionate about her cur- rent role as women’s captain of the triathlon club – “because I want to give some of the ex- perience and experiences I’ve gathered in Tri- athlon to other people and hope they enjoy the sport as much as I do!”

With an athlete as talented as Sophia who is clearly also so academically gifted , the temptation must be to slack off on the studying. Alas not, “I see University and getting my degree as a clear priority. I would have never allowed myself to dream of even starting at the World Championships two years later. I guess that is the excitement of it. The coming season will be a big step up for me — from Juniors to U23/Senior racing, which also means doubling distances. So my plan at the moment is to just see how everything goes. Although she mentioned that “even in that case I think I would get “bored” by just training, there would have to be some- thing that keeps my head occupied as well.

It is Sophia’s focus which sets her apart, but then, as she put it at the end of our interview, “I guess that’s what Oxford does to you.” 

Craven Cottage "in discussions" to hold Varsity football

0

While the Varsity rugby match has the glorious surroundings of Twickenham as a home, the football equivalent has led a more nomadic existence in recent years. However this week Fulham FC’s new owner, Shahid Khan, has expressed a strong desire to see the match return to its sometime-home of the West London side’s Craven Cottage for its 130th edition.

OUAFC’s Treasurer and goalkeeper Ben Szreter told Cherwell that “we are hopeful of securing a return of the varsity match to Craven cottage – a fantastic venue.” In an allusion to the match’s scheduling he went on to comment “I think the match on the day of the boat race will make the day very special for all fans. However discussions are very preliminary at the moment.”

In light of that, and a Fulham spokesman’s cautious remark that “we are in discussions to bring it back”, it’s probably best to not get carried away at the news. Even if, after a few years which has seen the fixture played in the pleasant but slightly dingier surroundings of Oxford’s very own Kassam Stadium, and the Cambridge United’s Abbey Stadium we could be forgiven for salivating at the prospect of a Premiership-standard home. Despite this though, the concept of Sunday April the 6th becoming a veritable festival of Oxbridge sport has left some excited – with an Exeter 2nd year lawyer marvelling at the poetry of the fact that, should these discussions prove fruitful, the Spring evening will see the rowers directly pass the venue of the day’s earlier Varsity tussle.

It’s worth taking a moment to consider the appropriateness of Craven Cottage too, as the throw-back style ground, complete with the cottage of its name, its pleasant riverside setting, and its turnstiles – prized as some of the few old-fashioned stadium entrances left in the upper echelons of English football – all combine to give the venue a traditional atmosphere and a sense of charm which go hand in hand with one of the oldest sporting rivalries of all.

Shahid Khan has now both removed the bizarre Michael Jackson statue from Craven Cottage’s façade and potentially provided a prestigious home for the University football match – not a bad beginning to his ownership, all told.

 

Boat Race Squads Announced

0

It may be 163 days until the next Oxford-Cambridge boat race, but we can definitely say that the countdown to the 2014 edition of this historic competition has started – and not just because we’ve worked out how long it is until it happens. Yesterday marked the unveiling of the 4 squads of men and women who will spend very little time in the College bar and an awful lot of time on icy rivers this winter, all with the aim of racing down the Thames next April. The squads announced include all of the rowers who will be attempting to make up either the respective Blue boats, or the reserve boats – Goldie and Isis.

As always, the squads are stacked with Olympians and other international rowers, all of whom are well, stacked. Highlights on the men’s side include the presence of Oxford University Boat Club President Malcolm Howard, and lucky charm Constantine Louloudis. Howard of course has twice represented Canada upon the biggest stage, while undergraduate classicist Louloudis will hope to make it three Boat Race victories out of three.

Including those two, the men’s Oxford squad welcomes back a grand total of 9 trialists from last year, with other returning Blues Karl Hudspith – last year’s victorious President – and Sam O’Connor, along with Joe Dawson, Nicholas Hazell, Iain Mandale, Tom Watson and cox Laurence Harvey who were integral to the Isis second string crew which also made it to Mortlake first last Easter.

Standout Oxford additions include the likes of Storm Uru, Keble’s New Zealander who won Olympic Bronze at Eton Dorney, and Zimbabwean undergrad James Fraser-Mackenzie who competed in the single scull at the same Olympic meeting.

This will be the last year to see the Women’s event take place at a different location and on a different occasion to the men’s, but they equally announced a strong looking set of rowers focused upon remaining superior to their Cantab. counterparts. With a strong selection of returners from last year such as Alice Carrington-Windo, Anastasia Chitty, Harriet Keane and OUWBC President, Maxie Scheske, they should prove formidable.

We can’t forget the opposition though, and with the Other Place announcing their own Canadian Olympian in Anthony Jacob alongside President Steve Dudek and former Boat Race winner Mike Thorp, the Dark Blue squad will have to put in the hard yards this winter in order to repeat last year’s victory and narrow the overall gap to Cambridge –  I’m sure none of them will forget the 4 win deficit as they train through the dark mornings to come.

The respective squads’ preparations will begin in earnest in late November as they race on the Tideway for the first time this season in the Fuller’s Head of the River Fours, expect coverage of that here. 

Sleeping Beauty

0

Sleep deprivation is a common at university, let alone at Oxford. You would be hard pressed to find an Oxonian who has made it safely to the end of the year without having pulled several an all-nighters. With emails delivered straight to your smart phones, and a proliferation of social networking tools, it’s very difficult to switch off. When the lack of sleep tires us out, constant work and social demands cause us to resort to sugar and caffeine to plow through, disturbing our sleep even more and making us exhausted.

Sleep is of vital importance to us, and a continual deficit can cause weight gain and stress, decrease our immunity and speed up skin ageing, along with other long-term health effects. So beautify yourself from the inside by catching up on sleep – seven to eight hours per night is the recommended amount. If you’re having trouble winding down, here are some tips to help you sleep your way to better health: 

  1. Change your diet. Don’t have big dinners, and avoid caffeine-laden food and drinks at night, such as chocolate, soft drinks and coffee. The same applies for spicy and fatty foods. As for alcohol, although it can make you feel drowsy, it actually disturbs sleep. Instead, eat foods that will help aid your sleep: lean white meat, seafood, leafy greens, yoghurt and edamame (which can be found for 99p after 9.30pm at Itsu!).
  2. Avoid exercising at night. Exercise makes you excited. If you do exercise in the evening, try a more relaxing sport such as yoga, and make sure you leave enough time for your body to calm down and unwind before going to bed.
  3. Use calming scents. Certain oil extracts, such as lavender and chamomile, can help you sleep better. Use This Works Deep Sleep Pillow Spray (£16 at boots) on your pillows and sheets, or, alternatively, make your own sleep spray! Simply add 10 drops of oil extract (Lavender, Bergamot, Chamomile or Sage are best for unwinding and relaxing), 1.5 teaspoons of witch hazel, and 10ml of distilled water to a spray bottle.
  4. Keep the noise down. If you can’t control external sounds, drown them out with rhythmic, soothing sounds from free apps such as Ambience Lite, White Noise Lite, eSleep Lite and NatureSpace (available on both Android and iPhone).
  5. Keep your room cool. A room that is too hot, too cold, or poorly ventilated, can disturb sleep.
  6. Sleep in the dark. Turn off your computer and cover electrical displays. Alternatively you can use a sleep mask – à la Audrey Hepburn in Breakfast at Tiffany’s.
  7. Catch up during the day. If worst comes to worst, a short power nap can contribute towards repaying your sleep debt without disturbing your sleep cycle.

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%8405%%[/mm-hide-text] 

Stalker fear for Univ students

0

Police are investigating the possibility that an Oxford student is being stalked after a series of incidents at a house in the Cowley area.

A house of five female students from University College has experienced two instances of highly alarming and potentially illegal behaviour over the past few weeks, with the same man appearing twice at their house and behaving in a highly threatening manner.

His attempts to break-in seem particularly focused on one of the women in the house, leading police to believe that he is a potential stalker.

The first such instance came on Wednesday 9th October, when, as the student returned from a night out, the man managed to gain access to the house by unknown means.

After spending some time in the house he was discovered by the woman when she woke, and found him attempting to kiss her as she lay in bed. He had entered her room and been using her laptop for some time as she slept unawares, also accessing her Facebook account and looking through her profile.

Police have been attempting to track him using the fingerprints and DNA left in the house. A man was mistakenly taken into custody but later released.

The same intruder returned last Thursday, and banged on the door in the early hours of the morning. One of the students opened the door to him after being unable to see who it was through the security lens in the door. She screamed upon recognising the man, waking the house, at which point he fled. She reported having also potentially heard somebody knocking on the window earlier in the evening.

Both incidents followed a visit to the same nightclub earlier in the evening, lending credibility to a pattern of stalking. Police are using CCTV footage of the man walking up and down Cowley Road, taken from a number of shops and businesses, but so far have been unable to identify the individual.

Apples in abundance at Hogacre Common

0

On Sunday the first annual Apple Day was held on Hogacre Common. The day was a joint venture between Abundance Oxford, the Hog Roast Café and Hogacre Eco Park, enterprises which seek to encourage sustainable and environmentally friendly living.

The apple harvest this year has been unusually high prompting this year’s Apple Day. Abundance Oxford is an initiative that harvests unwanted food and puts it to use.

There were 400 kilos to be enjoyed in apple soups, apple chutneys and ketchups and of course apple juice. The apples were macerated on site in a marquee then pressed before being served to the public. The proceeds from the day will be put towards supporting Abundance Oxford’s work and the other projects on Hogacre Eco Park.

The Eco Park is on Hogacre Common which is owned by Corpus Christi College is leased from the college for the annual price of a jar of honey. The Park is home to OxGrow and the Hog Roast Café. The café is entirely eco-friendly and was set up in June as a self sufficient and accessible place for the public to enjoy and as an extension of the other projects in the Park.

Academic success still determined by social background

0

Data collected from Britain and Sweden has shown that clever children from more privileged social backgrounds had double the chance of completing A-levels than children of similar intelligence but more disadvantaged backgrounds.

5,000 people, from the 1940s to the 1970s, were included in a study designed to establish the links between social background and educational attainment.

The waste of human resources was the key concern of the study. The organisers also highlighted the fact that, despite the headway made into social mobility, family resources were still the deciding factor for academic success.

A collaboration between Oxford’s Department of Social Policy and Intervention and the Swedish Institute for Social Research were responsible for the findings. They defined social background as made up of the following factors: social status, social class and the educational attainment of the parents.

The educational attainment of our parents plays the most important part in determining how well we will do in school, the study shows. It is a more important variable than natural ability, which was examined through cognitive testing on children aged between 10 and 13.

These assessments demonstrated the clear link between being bright and doing well academically later on. However, for the most able fifth of British children born in the 1970s, the most advantaged had an 80% chance of passing A-levels, while the prospects of the most disadvantaged stood only a 40% chance.

The findings rang true for children from Sweden as well as Britain, despite the oft-envied Swedish education system.

Lead researcher Dr. Erzsébet Bukodi, said, “We see that in both the British and Swedish educational systems, even the very brightest children are hampered if they come from a disadvantaged background.”

However, Oxford Professor John Goldthorpe pointed out some differences between the British and Swedish data. He explained, “In Britain, if the child was both bright and from an advantaged background, they did particularly well academically. While, in Sweden, we find children of low ability but from advantaged backgrounds do better than they would have done in Britain.”

St Anne’s medic George Gillett questions the study’s assertion that social background is the main problem, pointing towards the differing provision of education. He said, “The report ignores the fact that children from different social backgrounds will be more likely to go to different types of schools. Children from more privileged social backgrounds are more likely to go to higher achieving schools, which contributes to the disparity in attainment.”

Some, like linguist Evelyn Snow, find too narrow a definition of ‘success’ in the report. Snow commented, “People such as Alan Sugar have no ‘qualifications’ in terms of academics really but he is one of the most successful men of the previous generation. It is far more difficult now that so many more people are able to attend university as soon everyone will have a degree in something, even if something not previously seen as ‘academically viable’ which makes the already straining professional job market even more competitive.”

Somerville classicist Claudia Swan went on to suggest that the report’s measure of attainment, being A-level results, could have been flawed, saying, “The exams are so formulaic that without being instructed in what examiners are looking for intelligence is no guarantee of success.”