Thursday 11th September 2025
Blog Page 160

Oxford City Council could join nationwide calls for ban on disposable vapes

0

The Oxford City Council is holding discussions on whether it should support a ban on disposable vapes. A recent motion was proposed by Green Party councillors Lucy Pegg and Rosie Rawle at a council meeting on 2 October. 

Disposable vapes are known to be one of the more popular forms of e-cigarettes with 1 in 9 people between 11-18 experimenting with e-cigarettes with 69% choosing disposable vapes according to Action on Smoking and Health (ASH).  Oftentimes containing up to 2% nicotine they are known to cause both respiratory health problems and nicotine addiction to teenagers they market them to. Moreover, single-use vapes have a detrimental environmental impact with 5 million vapes being thrown away every week, an astonishing fourfold increase from last year. 

This move to ban disposable vapes comes from increased calls from ministers in Westminster to ban single-use in the UK due to public health and environmental reasons. The Scottish Government has already agreed to carry out a consultation on banning disposable vapes.

 In July, MPs pressured the government to introduce restrictions on the packaging and marketing of vapes that seemingly are targeted at children. Germany, New Zealand, Australia and France have all instituted bans or restrictions on both or either flavoured e-cigarettes and disposable vapes. 

The Oxford City Council in a recent press release also called attention to the fact that vapes contain critical raw materials such as lithium and copper which are critical for green technologies. The Council stated that “the disposable vapes thrown away over the past year contain enough lithium to create 5,000 batteries for electric cars”.

Green Party councillor Rosie Rawle meanwhile stated in the press release: “Vaping can be an effective public health intervention to reduce tobacco smoking, however, this could be achieved without the excessive reliance on environmentally damaging disposable vapes.”

Between 2020 and 2022, there has been a seven-fold increase in disposable vapes as well as an astonishing 50% year-on-year increase in the proportion of children using vapes of all kinds.

Deliveroo strikes in Oxford city centre

0

Assembling in Central Oxford last Friday, around 30 Deliveroo delivery drivers took to the roads to demand better pay and working conditions. A demonstration also took place outside the Carfax Tower. The drivers turned off notifications for incoming pick-up requests and drove slowly in order to cause maximum disruption.

In April of 2021, through the red smoke of their flares, Deliveroo drivers made similar demands outside the company’s London headquarters. Apart from raising public awareness around the few protections for food delivery drivers, these protests were largely unsuccessful.  

The primary demand of the riders is a pay raise. Amidst the cost-of-living crisis, the strikers have emphasized that Oxford is an expensive city. Since the pandemic, Deliveroo fees have decreased while costs to riders have increased. Labeled as self-employed, couriers must pay for their own fuel, bikes, motorcycles, helmets, backpacks, and any other supplies needed to safely complete deliveries. 

The strikers have multiple further longstanding demands, including extra compensation for long waiting times in restaurants, rough weather, late night deliveries, and mid-route changes to delivery addresses. Their demands reflect the de-prioritisation of riders in Deliveroo’s current system. The strikers want protection, and some are calling for government regulation of the food delivery industry. 

Hailing from a variety of international backgrounds, the strikers came together to plan the strike over a two-week period under the leadership of Deliveroo rider Nelson Martins from Timor-Leste. Many of the riders, including Martins, have been with the company for several years. Couriers from Just Eat and Uber Eats accompanied the strikers, making similar demands of their own companies.  

Many of the riders who spoke to the press chose to remain anonymous. One said “[W]e are scared of getting our names out because Deliveroo might close our accounts.” The riders say that, in the past, those who spoke up or complained to the company about unfair pay saw their accounts terminated.

The drivers are not direct employees of the delivery companies and so there is little regulatory protection for their position. In the past, protests of a similar nature have had limited success.

Deliveroo told BBC that in most cases drivers earned “significantly more” than “the National Living Wage plus costs” and Just Eat said its drivers were provided “regular incentives” to earn more. There is a significant disconnect between the perspectives of the drivers and their respective companies.  

Oxford research shows promise for repairing brain injuries with 3D printing

0

Researchers at the Oxford Martin School have developed a method of 3D printing cells that mimic the brain’s architecture. The research, published Wednesday 4 October, is the first to introduce the technique. Although nearly 70 million people are affected by brain injuries annually, existing treatments have only a limited effect.

Published in Nature Communications, the method involves using the patient’s stem cells as a “bioink” to print a structure that can become neural tissue in the brain. When tested on mice brain slices, the tissue was able to integrate and function with the host cells. The use of a patient’s stem cells removes the risk of rejection from the body. It also allows for greater practical use as cells can be harvested easily.

The aim of research going forward is to enhance the printing process to better mimic human brain structures. Beyond injuries, this could aid drug evaluation and further understanding of brain development and cognition. Senior author Dr Linna Zhou said: “Our droplet printing technique provides a means to engineer living 3D tissues with desired architectures, which brings us closer to the creation of personalised implantation treatments for brain injury.”

The technique uses human induced pluripotent stem cells. These cells are typically taken from blood or skin and are reprogrammed to be used as any type of cell. The immature cells are then differentiated into two variations, each used to print one layer of the tissue.

The Oxford Martin Programme on 3D Printing for Brain Repair aim to create low-cost medical technology to address the expanding problem of brain injury. Globally, 5.5 million people suffer a severe traumatic brain injury every year. Research is divided over the effects of traumatic brain injuries, with some evidence pointing to an increased risk of cognitive decline as a result. 

Senior author Professor Zoltán Molnár said: “It would be naïve to think that we can recreate the entire cellular progression in the laboratory. Nonetheless, our 3D printing project demonstrates substantial progress in controlling the fates and arrangements of human iPSCs [stem cells] to form the basic functional units of the cerebral cortex.”

Oxfordshire constituencies redrawn

0

The electoral map of Oxfordshire is set to be redrawn, with big implications for the next general election, as the four-month deadline for the Government to approve new constituency boundaries fast approaches.

Covering all 650 seats in the Commons, final proposals by the 2023 Periodic Review of Westminster Constituencies were laid before Parliament this June, following an extensive consultation by the four national boundary commissions. The commissioners decided against cutting the number of parliamentary seats down to 600; nonetheless, they made a number of significant changes in Oxford and beyond.

In particular, two wards in central Oxford, Carfax and Holywell – covering the vast majority of the University of Oxford’s colleges and a large population of students & academics – have been transferred to Layla Moran’s seat of Oxford West & Abingdon. This constituency will also receive the rural Marcham ward, while losing the outlying Kidlington and Yarnton communities.

With an early general election looking more and more likely, this mixture of urban and rural voters is likely to shake up the constituency’s political dynamics, opening new opportunities for student campaigners to find their voices, and potentially turning the contest into a three-way race between the Conservatives, Labour, and the incumbent Liberal Democrats.

These parties, whatever their national platforms, will be forced to take into account the sizeable student vote in the new boundaries when running their campaigns, and to rely on student political societies for campaign fieldwork.

Indeed, it’s possible that the focus of student political activism may shift westwards, from the safe seat of Oxford East – represented by Labour Party Chair & Shadow Cabinet member Anneliese Dodds M.P – in the face of a projected landslide for the Opposition.

Plans to split Banbury constituency in two, with Chipping Norton folded into Banbury and a new Bicester & Woodstock seat formed from wards in the District of West Oxfordshire, are also going ahead, though some responses to the consultation sought – unsuccessfully – to recognise Kidlington in the constituency’s name. 

There is little demographic variation in the new Oxfordshire constituencies, with each one sporting an electorate between 69,943 and 74,356.

Representatives of Oxford’s political parties seem entirely satisfied with the changes. Layla Moran M.P., speaking to Cherwell, described the review as “very positive for the Liberal Democrats”, expressing regret for the transfer of Kidlington and Yarnton but optimism for the party’s future prospects in the county.

“The new Bicester & Woodstock, Didcot & Wantage, Henley & Thame and Witney constituencies are all very solid prospects for the Lib Dems.”

Ms. Moran M.P. further praised the Boundary Commission for carrying out the 2023 Periodic Review “fairly and effectively”, though expressed the Liberal Democrats’ preference for a “fairer and more proportionate” electoral system.

The Oxford University Conservative Association, meanwhile, told Cherwell they were “excited for the new challenges” the updated electoral map poses, suggesting that the city “could become a genuinely competitive area for our party”.

All that remains is for the Government to submit an Order in Council to put the recommendations into effect.

The Oxford University Labour Club has been reached out to for comment.

“We should have done more”: Vice Chancellor addresses University’s handling of Stock controversy

0

Oxford University “should have done more” to protect trans members in the past year, Professor Irene Tracey has said. 

In her first oration to the university as vice-chancellor, Professor Tracey, Vice Chancellor of Oxford University, said that she is “disturbed” by the “ amplification of discourteous, intolerant and hateful rhetoric” faced by transgender students and staff over the past year. 

This comes after Kathleen Stock’s controversial address at the Oxford Union earlier this year — a decision that sparked substantial protest from students and staff across the university. 

While several student groups called for Stock’s invitation to be rescinded, Prof Tracey told the Times last May that Stock had “a right to come and speak. It’s as simple as that.”  At the Oration, however, Professor Tracey expressed regret at her handling of the controversy.

Tracey began by re-stating the University’s commitment to free speech, describing the issue as having been “centre stage” during the year. She continued: “I have been clear about our role in the university sector to protect free speech: it is core to how we teach subjects and expose students to different views”, adding that “this also goes hand in hand with our commitment to equality, diversity and inclusion.”

Tracey said she felt “deeply saddened” by the “abusive and threatening language and behaviours that our trans community suffered this year” which she described as being made “under the guise of free speech”.

On the University’s response to such issues, she reflected: “we should have done more to support them; rest assured lessons were learned. 

“In this university, I expect more and we will continue to strive to create a culture of tolerance and respectful disagreement on key issues of the day. That is how we learn together and evolve.”

Responding to the oration on X, formerly Twitter, President of Oxford’s LGBTQ+ Society Amiad Haran Diman wrote: “I was delighted to see a real tone shift and change of minds among the senior leadership, in stark contrast from their rhetoric in Trinity term.

“My meetings with university officials over the summer made me, for the first time, cautiously optimistic. And I very much hope that I won’t be proven wrong.”

Why is the care leaver population so low at Oxford?

0


Last year, there were double the number of people in space than care leavers studying for an undergraduate degree at the University of Oxford. Out of the 9,000 care leavers who applied to universities across the board, only five were considered talented enough to get into the top university in the world. What is behind this seismic underrepresentation at Oxford? Is it that those from the care system are thick, or is it the admissions process? 

This subject is an angry tenant in both my head and heart, as I am a care leaver studying at Oxford. I’m a graduate student, so I don’t fall within these figures. Regardless, the barriers are the same. It probably doesn’t surprise anybody that our most significant hurdle is financial. For instance, we don’t have parents to go back home to between term times, so we require accommodation all year round. Oxford does provide some financial assistance to help with this. £3,000 per year and a scholarship for undergraduates. But this is only up to the age of 25, yet 69% of applicants from the care system tend to be mature students. For graduates, there is now the Academic Futures Programme. However, these things aren’t always as accessible as they seem. 

When I started in 2022, I found no support for graduate care leavers. Of course, there are the usual scholarships open to everyone if they apply before the January deadline, and I did. But, I was placed on a waiting list to be considered after the March deadline, so I was no longer eligible. 

These arbitrary cut-off points in the admissions process fail people from the care system. 

It’s hard to be what you cannot see. When I left the care system at eighteen, I could hardly read or construct a sentence, let alone write a whole argument. Somehow, the dream of studying at Oxford got into my head. I believe when you have a dream, you have a responsibility to yourself to make it happen. For ten years, I prayed at the altar of hard work, grit, determination, and resilience to realise it. But being told ‘we think you’re good, but we want to see if anyone better applies’ almost broke that ambition. 

Getting the offer to study at Oxford was one of the proudest moments of my life. It should be. But when it came through (the financial declaration) the elation quickly subsided, as it made one condition on my offer. Along with all the other challenges of being a care leaver here, would I now be able to afford it? The process makes no concession for background or circumstance. 

I’m not saying the process needs to be watered down to let more people in. Far from it. I would hate for that sense of achievement to be devalued just to be seen to ‘do the right thing’. It should be hard. But the barriers need be the same for everyone, no matter their background. Not a Takeshi’s Castle of obstacles littered through the admissions process, eliminating many of the care leavers until there are only a handful of us. I believe this institution is better than that. 

You have to be the change you want to make. Is the University of Oxford ready to change the admissions process to be more inclusive to those like me from the care system? After all, studying at Oxford shouldn’t be as tough as entering space.

Image credit: Pexels via Freerange.

The rise of the old money aesthetic

0

Grab your linen shirts and Ralph Lauren loafers. Old Money is back with a vengeance. Amassing a hefty 54.3 million views on TikTok alone, the Old Money Aesthetic is dominating social media at the moment. But with some videos recommending outfits upwards of thousands of pounds, should we really be glamorising a trend that excludes so many wealth groups?

The Old Money aesthetic found its roots on TikTok in the summer of 2023. It’s a hashtag associated with “quiet luxury”, quality garments and the lifestyle to match. Popular videos see montages of champagne flutes, signet rings and – you guessed it – plenty of Oxbridge content too. The aesthetic is best embodied in an upper-class twentieth-century style found in the likes of the Kennedys, Princess Diana and even fictional characters like Blair Waldorf of Gossip Girl. Many have credited the TV show Succession with this revitalised fascination with inherited wealth, but the rise of “nepo baby” influencers like Sofia Richie and Hailey Bieber has also had a huge part to play. 

The trend for looking quietly (but obviously) expensive has found a new muse for the internet age. Sofia Richie, described by Business Insider as being the “epitome of Old Money,” is a social media influencer and daughter of singer Lionel Richie. Well known for adopting Vintage Chanel, tailored Ralph Lauren and “clean girl” aesthetics, Richie has become an aspirational figure on Instagram and TikTok. This natural progression of trends from one generation to the next is to be expected, but our desire to imitate someone who has inherited such enormous wealth in a society so crippled by inequality is also undeniably strange. With Rishi Sunak reportedly considering cutting the inheritance tax and recent studies predicting a rise in premature deaths following the cost of living crisis, it might be time for us to reconsider our casual idealisation of the wealthy online. 

Amidst a torrent of content advising lifestyles possible only to the top 1%, there are an equal number of posts recommending cheaper fashion duplicates that can help you “cheat” the Old Money look. Old Money isn’t as unattainable as it was in the mid-20th century, and yet the internet is abuzz with articles dedicated to uncovering the “subtle differences” between someone from “old” and “new money”. Old money “imposters” are being simultaneously encouraged to exist and exposed online in a move so egregiously classist it’s hard to believe we won’t look back on it with horror. 

In a post-pandemic world of economic instability and cost-of-living crises, we have to wonder why we’re choosing Old Money and expensive-looking clothes now. Naturally, fashion, and how much people are willing to spend on it, has always been influenced by the rise and fall of economies. Following the bedazzled OTT-ness of the early 2000s, for instance, the 2008 recession saw a spiked trend for minimalism. Such minimalism is also a clear feature of the Old Money aesthetic but luxury items (another key Old Money staple) saw a notable downturn in popularity after the 2008 financial crisis. 

Another possible reason for the popularity of Old Money is that it offers escapism at a time when many countries have been plagued by cost-of-living crises. Fashion, in some way, has always been able to offer a break from reality. Following the 1929 Wall Street Crash, a desire for fashion escapism manifested in cinema. The 1930s was a period that saw the chief wardrobe or costume consultant credited for the first time on screen. Clothes were important, expensive and exuberant, as actresses offered something most movie-goers could only dream of. Today, microtrends like #Europecore and resort fashion have provided Americans with a rest bite from the turmoil of US politics. Many people, clearly, are seeking some kind of distraction online and in what they choose to wear.

But it’s what these trends are distracting us from that proves most important of all. The Old Money aesthetic may just be playful escapism for some, a desire to forget the economic bleakness that surrounds them. But the hashtag is a powerful symbol and one with a damaging and problematic history. The Old Money lifestyle, for all its glamour, is a product of centuries of wealth inequality. It’s built on the fantasy of belonging to a certain class that has excluded those of lesser means and prospered whilst others struggled. It’s not the dressing up to look expensive that’s the problem here but the mindset behind it: one that, intentionally or not, romanticises classist and elitist ideals and perpetrates the notion that inherited money is somehow worthy of our adoration. 

Image Source: Eric Longden/CC BY 3.0 via Wikimedia Commons

Glittering Girls

0

Giggling, high heels caught in cobblestone as you collapse
In my arms as you’re wrecked with another fit of laughter-
You shriek in delight, stumble over air in rose-tinted time lapse
Head thrown back, eyes scrunched, clutching your sore belly after.

My darling girl, how you shine in the night,
The brightest star in the sky in your sequinned Zara mini dress.
My sugar and spice, in your alcoholic delight
You spin the world in your rendition of Dancing Queen, a mess

That only you can pull off. You strut in the age-old tradition of the young
In your painful, gorgeous shoes down the Highstreet, on the prowl.
After your day in the library, crying, as the world is ending, high-strung,
You let loose in a tale as old as time, divine feminine tradition, you growl

The lyrics to S&M, glittering gyration, my everything nice, you’re always game
As we chant the same words our ancestors chanted before us for the drink:
Those pinkish, fizzing potions: lick the salt, down it, bite the lime. All the same.
We connect with generations of carefree girls, unsteadily balancing on the brink

Between something new and something old. In the haze of neon glow, we are incandescent
And glorious, beautiful in our peacocking as we put on a show for the lucky few who watch.
The poltergeists of those before us, our mothers relive youth through our eyes, effervescent,
Heady perfume intoxicating as anything, shaped like a high-heeled shoe, turn it up a notch

As you put your graceful, swan’s arms around my neck, your nails my pendant, bejewel
Easily with your sparkling presence: your golden laugh, your silvery hair. I will treasure
These moments for years to come, as we dance as one. You sway, effortlessly cool.
How I used to wish I was you- but no, then I’d have to lose you, my sweetest pleasure.

And the fire in our hearts is kindled as tequila burns down our throats. You take a stance
On things I know you don’t care about as you pick fights with men for the sake of it: bliss
Must describe this moment: short and sweet sibilance, let me romanticise this dance,
Our final one of the night, one last silly prance, your face aghast when we finally leave this

Garden of Eden- sipping that J2O apple you took away from the bar, cough on the bubbles
As we walk back past the Radcam, the way we came, and I look you up and down, laugh
At your humanity, at your vulnerability, knowing tomorrow will come that crumbling rubble
Of the remains of last night’s Pompey, as we bask hungover in snowing, volcanic aftermath.

A Summer as a Volunteer at the National Portrait Gallery

The ‘Long Vac’ is called ‘long’ for a reason and I did not want to waste a second of it. When I saw the National Portrait Gallery had set up a new volunteering scheme, I knew I had to jump at the chance. Not only was this an opportunity to get out of the house during the summer and do something, but it was an exciting opportunity to meet new people, gain new skills, and learn new things in a different environment to what I was accustomed to. I eagerly applied and waited to hear back from the Visitor Experience team, only to be shortly offered an interview afterwards and then a place as a volunteer.

By the time I went for my induction in Trinity Term, the gallery had undergone a significant transformation since closing its doors in March 2023. It boasted a more cohesive layout, designed to take you on both a physical and an intellectual through art history—it was clear that a lot of careful thought and consideration had gone into its reorganisation, with the addition of a new floor dedicated to contemporary art (the Weston Wing, Floor 1) serving to reaffirm this. You cannot begin to imagine my excitement as I stood at the centre of the gallery, surrounded by centuries worth of art, and realised how lucky I was to be there.

My job as a volunteer for the Visitor Experience team was to act as a source of information and help for visitors. We worked on a rota which directed us around the gallery to various spots where we were needed most; I moved to a new location every half an hour, allowing me exposure to the different floors and all the artworks they had to offer.

My first shift began at 10 a.m. and it was only a week or so after the big reopening: armed with a handful of maps and pamphlets, I stood by the doors of the Ondaatje Main Hall and watched the gallery come alive as people from all walks of life flooded in. By the end of my shift, I had met several wonderful people, learnt about two new pieces of art, and had already radioed someone despite being terrified to touch the walkie-talkie.

Most shifts followed a similar pattern, but each offered a new opportunity to get involved with gallery life. My favourite experience was when we worked with the Learning Volunteers. Their job was primarily to deal with schools and families, so when we were assigned to help them during the Summer Family Festival it was a nice change from our usual routine. Not only was it great getting to engage with a younger audience, but it made me hopeful to watch a future generation of young artists walk out with smiles plastered on their faces, proudly waving their artwork around in the air as they went to show their friends and families.

Volunteering at the National Portrait Gallery this summer was one of the best choices I made. It gave me a true insight into the other side of galleries and museums you rarely get to see. Although, the experience would not have been the same had it not been for all the people I met along the way. Each shared their nuggets of experience and wisdom with me, but there is one person who sticks out in my mind.

“L,” as I will call them, was working a shift with me following an earlier shift we had worked together. We properly introduced ourselves and began making small talk in between directing visitors and answering questions about the art. The conversation quickly turned into a discussion about our beliefs having moved from a more sobering topic of death to one of life, energy, and spirituality. The candid nature of our conversation combined with their overwhelming passion and energy had such an effect on me that it made me rethink everything. From that moment forward a series of serendipitous events happened to coincide and I could not help but feel our conversation had something to do with it.

I went into this experience expecting to learn a little about art and do something interesting over the summer, yet I left with a changed perspective on life. Now, I’m not saying that is the standard for all future volunteering experiences, but I would like to emphasise the importance of trying new things and going out of your comfort zone since you never know what experiences and opportunities might come your way. I would recommend volunteering at the National Portrait Gallery to anyone and I can only hope it is a lasting opportunity for the future to come.

“A Must-See”: Colour Revolution at the Ashmolean

I did not know what to expect when I arrived at the Ashmolean to preview their newest exhibition, Colour Revolution: Victorian Art, Fashion & Design. When I think of the Victorian era, I think of darkness, depression, and disease–so you can imagine my shock when I left with a new perception of the Victorians, unlike anything I had thought before.

The curators play on the traditional image of the Victorian era that most of us have today when you enter the first room. The walls are grey; the lights are gloomy. The sparsity forces you to focus on the single piece in the room, Queen Victoria’s iconic black silk mourning dress. You cannot help but feel the weight of the period epitomised in this one item recognisable to most, if not all.

As you turn the corner, you are met with an array of light and colour. Your first introduction is to a series of artworks by John Ruskin, who helped pioneer changes in attitude towards colour during this period along with artists like J. M. W. Turner–whose ‘Venice, from the Porch of Madonna della Salute’ (c. 1835) is placed among Ruskin’s paintings in a vibrant celebration of colour in art.

The following room juxtaposes art, science, and religion to reflect the growing tension between them as colour came to symbolise progression and modernity. Collections of pre-Raphaelite art sit across the room from images of scientific discovery and a bizarre, but relevant, glass case of hummingbirds. The pre-Raphaelite movement attempted to redefine the use of colour as a medium for
glorifying God, yet received a mixed reaction from contemporary audiences due to the conflation of colour in art with Roman Catholicism and idolatry. Whilst breakthroughs in physics and biology served to cause even greater confusion: Sir Isaac Newton’s work on rainbows and the spectrum of colour came to symbolise the covenant between God and man, reaffirming pre-Raphaelite use of colour, but Charles Darwin’s theories on sexual selection de-sacralised colour as seductive and impure.

The next room offers a brief intervention with the history of dyes, providing relief from the artwork to briefly showcase some fashion. However, the central room is emphasised by the curators as the most important. They have reunited multiple pieces of art for the first time since being showcased at the International Exhibition of 1862. This room is impressive in terms of its historical significance but less in its artistic meaning compared to other rooms.

The room on Orientalist art is undeniably beautiful, with the portrait of ‘Scheherazade’ by Sophie Anderson (1870-1880) standing apart from the rest. It is a shame they did not do more with it, but it certainly strikes a chord regardless of its brevity.

The final room combines a series of artistic mediums in a final push to display the changing attitude towards colour in the wake of modernity. Your attention shifts to a series of artworks that signal a shift away from the pre-Raphaelite movements of the earlier nineteenth century towards the Aestheticism of the later years. Here you can enjoy pieces such as Ramon Casas’ ‘Jove Decadent, Despres del ball’ (1899) and Duchess Louise’s Queen Zenobia fancy dress (1897) in a display of decadence and decay reflecting the moral corruption caused by modernity but making for some fantastic works of art.

This exhibition challenged my understanding of the Victorian era by placing it in the context of a ‘colour revolution.’ I was charmed by its theatrical nature and the journey it took me on from start to finish despite my initial uncertainty that I would enjoy what I was going to see. It is a must-see for anyone living in or visiting Oxford over the next few months.