Friday, April 25, 2025
Blog Page 1616

Students alarmed by alcohol awareness campaign

0

A series of controversial anti-rape posters, which raised concerns amongst students across the University, have now been taken down.

One poster was spotted by a fresher on a college staircase, leading to its prompt removal. Another, in the reception area of the St Aldates Police Station, has also been withdrawn.

Student feminists have accused the campaign of promoting the view that rape occurs as a consequence of women drinking on nights out rather than as an unprovoked criminal act.

One Exeter student commented, “In certain campaigns there is a disproportionate obsession with how victims behave, contrasted with a reluctance to lay blame clearly on the rapists. Victim blaming is partly responsible for the fact that rape is under-reported and so little is done about it. The posters in Oxford sent out the message that it’s fine for Oxford male students to get drunk and party, but irresponsible for women to do the same.”

Thames Valley Police stated, “This poster was originally part of an alcohol awareness campaign encouraging people not to buy alcohol for under-18s. It is not our intention to cause alarm or distress with any of the messages that we display in our police stations – we only ever attempt to show potential victims how to avoid becoming vulnerable. We will remove the poster that has caused concern from public view.”

PPE Society members denied entrance to John McCain event

0

PPE Society has been forced to apologize to its members after some were denied entry to an event they had been promised ‘guaranteed entry’ to.

John McCain was speaking at the Oxford Union in conjunction with the PPE Society.

Queues reportedly stretched back onto Cornmarket Street and some PPE Society members who arrived later in the evening were turned away, much to their surprise.

One second year, who choose to remain anonymous, said, ‘The only reason I became a member of PPE society was to gain entry to this event. I cannot describe how distraught I am about not being able to see such an eminent statesman. A once in a lifetime opprtunity has been lost.’

An email from PPE Society President, Evan Lum, apologized profusely for the debacle. The email explained, “In short, a grave miscommunication with the Union denied you the priority spaces we had told you were yours […] explanations are good, but they aren’t the same thing as an apology, and you deserve one of those as well: we’re sorry.’

On the Facebook page of the PPE Society, it was claimed that members could visit the wesbite ‘to to register your place.’

It continued, ‘Anyone can become a member within minutes, and can then put their name down for guaranteed entry to the event – no worrying about whether you have a place or not.’

This, however, was not what the Union understood, as they had thought that PPE Society wanted 150 guaranteed places in the queue, not ‘guaranteed entry’. Both parties blamed unfortunate miscommunication, rather than each other, for the confusion.

Lum’s email went on, “there was a disjunct between what the PPE Society committee thought the Union had promised society members (150 seats) and what the Union were in fact willing to offer on the ground (150 places in the main queue)”. He ended his email asking those who thought they had a place but were denied to come forward and email him, “so that we can both get a sense of the scale of the mistake and work out a solution”.

There was no written contract between the societies for the event, and this is thought to have contributed to the mix up.

Union President John Lee said it would have been unfair for his Union members if 150 PPE Society members had arrived just before the event and been able to go in ahead of those who had queued for far longer. He explained that the standard policy at the Union was “first come first served”.

Many members signed up to PPE Society at freshers’ fair in order to see Senator McCain. Lum explained, ‘We’re sorry that you, our members, missed out on entry to one of the four keynote speakers of this term, and probably the one many of you wanted to see most. There’s no getting away from that fact, and we don’t intend to.’

Oxford rejects proposal for university report cards

0

Oxford University has restated its stance against adopting new graduate ‘report cards’ that are being rolled out for students across the country.

Incoming undergraduates at 104 higher education institutions – over half the UK total – will receive the new ‘Higher Education Achievement Report’ (HEAR) upon completing their degrees. More universities are expected to follow.
But a spokesperson for Oxford University commented, “Based on evidence from the HEAR pilot and feedback showing a lack of interest from employers, Oxford has no plans to implement the HEAR, unless evidence of demand for it from our students or employers emerges.”
Trialled by 18 universities since 2008, the HEAR consists of a six-page report, giving a detailed breakdown of a graduate’s module marks, skills gained from their course, as well as academic prizes and extra-curricular activities.It is hoped the HEAR will help employers seek out the best candidates, instead of having to rely solely on traditional degree classifications.
Following the Wilson Review of business-university collaboration, the Department of Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) signalled their support for the HEAR in a formal response to the review in June.
In response to Oxford’s statement, a spokesperson for BIS stressed that the HEAR was developed “in partnership with employers” and informed Cherwell, “it is for each institution to decide whether or not it will implement it.”
OUSU Vice-President for Academic Affairs, David Messling, believed that the HEAR would lead to a “sticky situation” where the University “decides which teams, societies, and activities do or don’t get its seal of approval”.
He added, “with the benefit of an individual tutorial relationship and advice from the Oxford Careers Service, Oxford students don’t really need HEAR.”
Jonathan Black, Careers Service director, echoed this scepticism. “Our discussions with employers suggest they have no plans to use the HEAR for selection. Most select based on university ranking and students’ degrees.
“The HEAR is a standard checklist that may not be applicable to each Oxford student. A CV’s language and presentation communicates a great deal more about a candidate in a way a standardised form cannot.
“University must help students prepare for the adjustment to an unstructured, post-education environment – a checklist unnecessarily continues the highly structured approach of school.”
Oxford students had mixed and cautious thoughts. Second year St Anne’s mathematician Connie Triggs expressed a favourable opinion, “as long as they don’t get rid of the old classification system altogether.”
“It would give employers a better idea of your expertise, especially you’re going for a job directly related to your degree.”
Meanwhile second year Keble historian Emma Harper said it could, “potentially distinguish me from the mass of historians who will probably get 2:1s.”
However she also asked, “How do you compare modules between universities? Who decides what skills you have achieved from each module? Are employers going to care about your individual marks? Will they even read all that information?”
Good degree classifications have been steadily increasing, inspiring reports this summer that leading companies were screening out those without top marks. Figures from the Higher Education Statistics Agency show that in 2010-11, firsts and 2:1s were awarded to 64 per cent of graduates.
The HEAR has been endorsed by Universities UK and GuildHE, two major higher education representative bodies. BIS claims it will give employers “richer information” about students, who in turn get “a much fuller record of their achievements.”
Editor of The Times Good University Guide, John O’Leary, warned that the HEAR could be “a costly waste of time”. Speaking to Cherwell, he commented, “employers tend to prefer sticking with what they know.”
“They might like something simple like a grade point average, but I doubt many will wade through the detail in the new reports.” He added that it was “too early” to say whether achievement reports would replace degree classifications.”
However, he did not see the changes as “anti-academic”, despite concerns that they represented further ‘marketising’ in higher education, “I would have thought most academics would like to see their courses recognised, rather than simply contributing to a classification.”

Oxford University has restated its stance against adopting new graduate ‘report cards’ that are being rolled out for students across the country.

Incoming undergraduates at 104 higher education institutions – over half the UK total – will receive the new ‘Higher Education Achievement Report’ (HEAR) upon completing their degrees. More universities are expected to follow.

But a spokesperson for Oxford University commented, “Based on evidence from the HEAR pilot and feedback showing a lack of interest from employers, Oxford has no plans to implement the HEAR, unless evidence of demand for it from our students or employers emerges.”

Trialled by 18 universities since 2008, the HEAR consists of a six-page report, giving a detailed breakdown of a graduate’s module marks, skills gained from their course, as well as academic prizes and extra-curricular activities. It is hoped the HEAR will help employers seek out the best candidates, instead of having to rely solely on traditional degree classifications.

Following the Wilson Review of business-university collaboration, the Department of Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) signalled their support for the HEAR in a formal response to the review in June.

In response to Oxford’s statement, a spokesperson for BIS stressed that the HEAR was developed “in partnership with employers” and informed Cherwell, “it is for each institution to decide whether or not it will implement it.”

OUSU Vice-President for Academic Affairs, David Messling, believed that the HEAR would lead to a “sticky situation” where the University “decides which teams, societies, and activities do or don’t get its seal of approval”.

He added, “with the benefit of an individual tutorial relationship and advice from the Oxford Careers Service, Oxford students don’t really need HEAR.”

Jonathan Black, Careers Service director, echoed this scepticism. “Our discussions with employers suggest they have no plans to use the HEAR for selection. Most select based on university ranking and students’ degrees.“

‘The HEAR is a standard checklist that may not be applicable to each Oxford student. A CV’s language and presentation communicates a great deal more about a candidate in a way a standardised form cannot. University must help students prepare for the adjustment to an unstructured, post-education environment – a checklist unnecessarily continues the highly structured approach of school.”

Oxford students had mixed and cautious thoughts. Second year St Anne’s mathematician Connie Triggs expressed a favourable opinion, “as long as they don’t get rid of the old classification system altogether.”

She continued, “It would give employers a better idea of your expertise, especially you’re going for a job directly related to your degree.”

Meanwhile second year Keble historian Emma Harper said it could, “potentially distinguish me from the mass of historians who will probably get 2:1s.”

However, she also asked, “How do you compare modules between universities? Who decides what skills you have achieved from each module? Are employers going to care about your individual marks? Will they even read all that information?”

Good degree classifications have been steadily increasing, inspiring reports this summer that leading companies were screening out those without top marks. Figures from the Higher Education Statistics Agency show that in 2010-11, firsts and 2:1s were awarded to 64 per cent of graduates.

The HEAR has been endorsed by Universities UK and GuildHE, two major higher education representative bodies. BIS claims it will give employers “richer information” about students, who in turn get “a much fuller record of their achievements.”

Editor of The Times Good University Guide, John O’Leary, warned that the HEAR could be “a costly waste of time”. Speaking to Cherwell, he commented, “employers tend to prefer sticking with what they know.”

‘They might like something simple like a grade point average, but I doubt many will wade through the detail in the new reports.” He added that it was “too early” to say whether achievement reports would replace degree classifications.”

However, he did not see the changes as “anti-academic”, despite concerns that they represented further ‘marketising’ in higher education, “I would have thought most academics would like to see their courses recognised, rather than simply contributing to a classification.”

Bo Guagua defends father

0

Oxford graduate Bo Guagua came out in defence of his father, Chinese politican Bo Xilai, last week. 

His defence follows an announcement by China’s state news agency, Xinhua, reporting an official statement from a party leaders’ meeting. Xinhua said Mr Bo stood accused of corruption, abuse of power, bribe-taking and even improper relations with women.
Describing his father as “upright in his beliefs and devoted to duty”, this is the first time that Bo Guagua has explicitly mentioned the case since the scandal, which has engulfed both his parents, unfolded.
Following the death of British businessman Neil Heywood in November 2011 and the subsequent conviction of Xilai’s wife, Gu Kailai in August 2012, a series of accusations have surfaced. Mr Bo has not been seen in public since mid-March, shortly after the scandal erupted and it was announced that he was under investigation. He was expelled from his post in the Communist Party in April.
48 hours after Xinhua’s report, Bo Guagua’s statement supporting his father appeared online. It read, “Personally, it is hard for me to believe the allegations that were announced against my father, because they contradict everything I have come to know about him throughout my life.”
In response to accusations of abuses of power he stated, “Although the policies my father enacted are open to debate, the father I know is upright in his beliefs and devoted to duty.” Bo Guaga claims that his father always taught him, “to be my own person and to have concern for causes greater than ourselves. I have tried to follow his advice.”
Since the start of the scandal, media interest in Guagua’s private life has been increasing with depictions of him as both a playboy and socialite. Studying PPE at Balliol from 2006-2010 Guagua gained a 2:1, but rusticated, living in the Randolph Hotel for a significant amount of time during his studies. 
Ryan Widdows, a second year History and Politics student, argued, “Considering Guagua’s alleged playboy lifestyle perhaps it’s not surprising that he’s sticking by his father over the infidelity accusations. Although let’s face it, China isn’t particularly renowned for being judicially and politically just and attempts to disgrace Bo Xilai have to be taken with a pinch of salt.”
Guagua is now be living in the USA after leaving Harvard this year. The situation continues to develop with Guagua stating, “I expect the legal process to follow its normal course, and I will await the result.”

His defence follows an announcement by China’s state news agency, Xinhua, reporting an official statement from a party leaders’ meeting.

Xinhua said Mr Bo stood accused of corruption, abuse of power, bribe-taking and even improper relations with women.

Describing his father as “upright in his beliefs and devoted to duty”, this is the first time that Bo Guagua has explicitly mentioned the case since the scandal, which has engulfed both his parents, unfolded.

Following the death of British businessman Neil Heywood in November 2011 and the subsequent conviction of Xilai’s wife, Gu Kailai in August 2012, a series of accusations have surfaced. Mr Bo has not been seen in public since mid-March, shortly after the scandal erupted and it was announced that he was under investigation. He was expelled from his post in the Communist Party in April.

48 hours after Xinhua’s report, Bo Guagua’s statement supporting his father appeared online. It read, “Personally, it is hard for me to believe the allegations that were announced against my father, because they contradict everything I have come to know about him throughout my life.”

In response to accusations of abuses of power he stated, “Although the policies my father enacted are open to debate, the father I know is upright in his beliefs and devoted to duty.” Bo Guaga claims that his father always taught him, “to be my own person and to have concern for causes greater than ourselves. I have tried to follow his advice.”

Since the start of the scandal, media interest in Guagua’s private life has been increasing with depictions of him as both a playboy and socialite. Studying PPE at Balliol from 2006-2010 Guagua gained a 2:1, but rusticated, living in the Randolph Hotel for a significant amount of time during his studies. 

Ryan Widdows, a second year History and Politics student, argued, “Considering Guagua’s alleged playboy lifestyle perhaps it’s not surprising that he’s sticking by his father over the infidelity accusations. Although let’s face it, China isn’t particularly renowned for being judicially and politically just and attempts to disgrace Bo Xilai have to be taken with a pinch of salt.”

Guagua is now living in the USA after leaving Harvard this year. The situation continues to develop with Guagua stating, “I expect the legal process to follow its normal course, and I will await the result.”

Oxford police crack down on crime against students

0

As thousands of new students arrive in Oxford, Thames Valley Police have launched a new operation to prevent students becoming the victims of crime. As part of Operation Bachelor students will be given crime awareness packs, plain-clothes police will patrol areas to check security, and there will be crime prevention information available for foreign students.

The launch of the crime awareness packs and police patrols comes after concerns that students new to the city are targeted by thieves. In August a criminal posing as a plain-clothes policeman robbed a student of his phone and money. The thief claimed to be investigating the theft of a mobile telephone and searched the student’s bag before confiscating his phone. He told the student that he could collect his belongings at the police station later. 
Thames Valley Police Press Officer Adam Fisher told Cherwell, “The universities do a lot of awareness work during Freshers’ Week and have their own crime reduction advisor. From a police point of view any awareness packs are beneficial if they increase the safety understanding of students.” 
Delia Sinclair, city councillor and board member for crime and community safety, praised the operation, saying, “This sounds like a good idea. Anything which helps keep students safe is a positive”.
In a statement OUSU spokesman Sarah Santhosham said, “The Oxford University Student Union has good relations with the police and the Security Services, and they work together on issues relating to student safety. Operation Bachelor is designed to make students more aware of their personal safety, preventing them from being victims of crime, a threat that is particularly prevalent when students return to Oxford. We welcome these initiatives as a means of ensuring students are informed of ways to increase their safety and do not fall victim to crime while in Oxford.”

As thousands of new students arrive in Oxford, Thames Valley Police have launched a new operation to prevent students becoming the victims of crime.

As part of Operation Bachelor students will be given crime awareness packs, plain-clothes police will patrol areas to check security, and there will be crime prevention information available for foreign students.

The launch of the crime awareness packs and police patrols comes after concerns that students new to the city are targeted by thieves. In August a criminal posing as a plain-clothes policeman robbed a student of his phone and money.

The thief claimed to be investigating the theft of a mobile telephone and searched the student’s bag before confiscating his phone. He told the student that he could collect his belongings at the police station later. 

Thames Valley Police Press Officer Adam Fisher told Cherwell, “The universities do a lot of awareness work during Freshers’ Week and have their own crime reduction advisor. From a police point of view any awareness packs are beneficial if they increase the safety understanding of students.” 

Delia Sinclair, city councillor and board member for crime and community safety, praised the operation, saying, “This sounds like a good idea. Anything which helps keep students safe is a positive”.

In a statement OUSU spokesman Sarah Santhosham said, “The Oxford University Student Union has good relations with the police and the Security Services, and they work together on issues relating to student safety.’

‘Operation Bachelor is designed to make students more aware of their personal safety, preventing them from being victims of crime, a threat that is particularly prevalent when students return to Oxford. We welcome these initiatives as a means of ensuring students are informed of ways to increase their safety and do not fall victim to crime while in Oxford.”

Oxford alumnus wins Nobel Prize

0

Christ Church alumnus Sir John Gurdon has been announced as the joint winner of this year’s Medicine Nobel Prize for his groundbreaking discovery that mature cells can be reprogrammed to become pluripotent.

Sir Gurdon described himself as “immensely honoured” to be given the reward and “enormously grateful” for the work of his colleagues. Stem cells contain the genetic information to specialise and become part of any tissue in the body. When these cells mature they lose information they no longer need to express. Previously, it  was thought that once a stem cell  had matured it had irreversibly lost its genetic information. Sir Gurdon’s discovery showed that this is not the case, as the information from multiple mature cells can be added together to effectively recreate a stem cell.
Julian Savulescu, Professor of Practical Ethics at Oxford claims Gurdon congratulated the winners on what their research would mean for medicine. “Until now, dead or damaged tissue and organs, for example in the brain or heart, have been replaced by scar tissue. This results in loss of function … Regenerative medicine offers the prospect of replacing dead or damaged human parts with new functioning ones.”
It was in Oxford’s Department of Zoology in 1972 that Sir Gurdon first developed his hypothesis. He replaced the cell nucleus of a frog egg cell with the nucleus from a mature intestinal cell. The modified egg still developed into a healthy tadpole, showing that all the necessary genetic information was still there in the intestinal cell. 
Though Gurdon’s initial discovery took place at Oxford, he subsequently moved to Cambridge where he became a Professor and Master of Magdalene College. The Gurdon Institute in Cambridge was renamed in 2004 in honour of his work. Gurdon’s scientific success was not always so widely acknowledged. He has framed a school report from when he was at Eton, aged 15, in which his master describes his scientific ambitions as, “quite ridiculous”, warning that “any time spent on it would be a total waste.”

Christ Church alumnus Sir John Gurdon has been announced as the joint winner of this year’s Medicine Nobel Prize for his groundbreaking discovery that mature cells can be reprogrammed to become pluripotent.

Sir Gurdon described himself as “immensely honoured” to be given the reward and “enormously grateful” for the work of his colleagues. Stem cells contain the genetic information to specialise and become part of any tissue in the body. When these cells mature they lose information they no longer need to express.

Previously, it  was thought that once a stem cell  had matured it had irreversibly lost its genetic information. Sir Gurdon’s discovery showed that this is not the case, as the information from multiple mature cells can be added together to effectively recreate a stem cell.

Julian Savulescu, Professor of Practical Ethics at Oxford claims Gurdon congratulated the winners on what their research would mean for medicine. “Until now, dead or damaged tissue and organs, for example in the brain or heart, have been replaced by scar tissue. This results in loss of function … Regenerative medicine offers the prospect of replacing dead or damaged human parts with new functioning ones.”

It was in Oxford’s Department of Zoology in 1972 that Sir Gurdon first developed his hypothesis. He replaced the cell nucleus of a frog egg cell with the nucleus from a mature intestinal cell. The modified egg still developed into a healthy tadpole, showing that all the necessary genetic information was still there in the intestinal cell. 

Though Gurdon’s initial discovery took place at Oxford, he subsequently moved to Cambridge where he became a Professor and Master of Magdalene College. The Gurdon Institute in Cambridge was renamed in 2004 in honour of his work.

Gurdon’s scientific success was not always so widely acknowledged. He has framed a school report from when he was at Eton, aged 15, in which his master describes his scientific ambitions as, “quite ridiculous”, warning that “any time spent on it would be a total waste.”

Oxford’s only strip club closed

0

Oxford’s only lapdancing club has closed after a decision to strip it of its licence by the local council. The closure follows claims that the club created a “hostile atmosphere.”

The Lodge Gentlemen’s Club, located by the Ice Rink on Oxpens Road, was last year forced to move from its former location on St Ebbes Street. Previously, the club had been located  only 50 yards from St Ebbes Church in Pennyfarthing Place, and there had been a sustained campaign to have the venue closed down.
The council’s latest decision  was met with a promise from Al Thompson, the club’s owner, to fight the city council all the way to the High Court if necessary.
“They granted us a licence a year ago and now they’ve suddenly decided to change their minds, leaving a lot of people out of a job and wrecking a perfectly viable business” he argued in the Oxford Mail, claiming that up to 50 women worked in the club.
However, a representative of the local council pointed to the 23 letters of complaint against the renewal of the club’s licence. Sub-Licensing Committee Chairman Van Coulter said, “We heard that the existence of the club has given rise to problems in the area. There was one lady, for example, who gave testimony about comments made to her, which I am too much of a gentleman to repeat.”
He continued, “We have evidence that the existence of the club has created a hostile atmosphere, and we decided to give weight to that.”
Al Thompson refuted the accusations as “hearsay” before questioning why the police had been absent from the licence renewal meeting, a point on which Thames Valley Police has declined to comment.
Should his appeal fail Mr Thompson intends to reopen The Lodge as a nightclub.
The news has drawn mixed reactions from the student community, with several students endorsing the council’s decision. One second year PPEist said of strip clubs, “Personally I don’t see the point of them at all”, adding, “It’s the council’s job to take into account the views of people living in the area – it’s their right.”
Midori Takenaka, a second year lawyer at Corpus Christi College, echoed these sentiments, saying, “I feel that the whole industry of ‘strip clubs’ is derogatory to women. The case should be thrown out of the High Court, if only to send a message to the public that using women as sexual objects is unacceptable in this day and age.”
Yet not all students were so concerned. Tom Heaps, a second year historian, although emphasising the fact that he does not condone the sex industry, said of the owner’s threat to take the case to the High Court, “I fully respect the owner’s decision to defend his livelihood.” 
Noah Evans-Harding, a second year medic, expressed ambivalence at the news, arguing, “I don’t really mind it being closed: they were better in Bangkok.”

Oxford’s only lapdancing club has closed after a decision to strip it of its licence by the local council. The closure follows claims by locals residents that the club created a “hostile atmosphere.”

The Lodge Gentlemen’s Club, located by the Ice Rink on Oxpens Road, was last year forced to move from its former location on St Ebbes Street.

Previously, the club had been located only 50 yards from St Ebbes Church in Pennyfarthing Place, and there had been a sustained campaign to have the venue closed down.

The council’s latest decision  was met with a promise from Al Thompson, the club’s owner, to fight the city council all the way to the High Court if necessary.

“They granted us a licence a year ago and now they’ve suddenly decided to change their minds, leaving a lot of people out of a job and wrecking a perfectly viable business” he told the Oxford Mail, claiming that up to 50 women worked in the club.

However, a representative of the local council pointed to the 23 letters of complaint against the renewal of the club’s licence. Sub-Licensing Committee Chairman Van Coulter said, “We heard that the existence of the club has given rise to problems in the area. There was one lady, for example, who gave testimony about comments made to her, which I am too much of a gentleman to repeat.”

He continued, “We have evidence that the existence of the club has created a hostile atmosphere, and we decided to give weight to that.”

Al Thompson refuted the accusations as “hearsay” before questioning why the police had been absent from the licence renewal meeting, a point on which Thames Valley Police has declined to comment.

Should his appeal fail Mr Thompson intends to reopen The Lodge as a nightclub.The news has drawn mixed reactions from the student community, with several students endorsing the council’s decision. One second year PPEist said of strip clubs, “Personally I don’t see the point of them at all”, adding, “It’s the council’s job to take into account the views of people living in the area – it’s their right.”

Midori Takenaka, a second year lawyer at Corpus Christi College, echoed these sentiments, saying, “I feel that the whole industry of ‘strip clubs’ is derogatory to women. The case should be thrown out of the High Court, if only to send a message to the public that using women as sexual objects is unacceptable in this day and age.”

Yet not all students were so concerned. Tom Heaps, a second year historian, although emphasising the fact that he does not condone the sex industry, said of the owner’s threat to take the case to the High Court, “I fully respect the owner’s decision to defend his livelihood.” 

One second year medic expressed ambivalence at the news, arguing, “I don’t really mind it being closed: they were better in Bangkok.”

Students produce poetry anthology

0

Students around Oxford have created a poetry anthology for Oxfam as part of their drive to instigate creative campaigning and fundraising.

The anthology is themed around Oxfam’s current flagship campaign ‘GROW’, which promotes food justice. Rosie Ball, Vice-President of Oxford Students’ Oxfam Group (OSOG), explained, “This anthology is a selection of poems submitted around the theme GROW: growing inside, growing outside, growing around the sides, growing into yourself, growing into your clothes, buying a shirt that’s too big for you and learning how to fit in.”

The theme was interpreted very broadly by 12 poets from different colleges. Phil Coales, President of OSOG told Cherwell, “it opened really strongly with poems by Tyra Lagerberg, Roly Bagnall and Adam Heardman.’

The launch event of the GROW anthology was held on February 25th where featured poets read their work alongside Caroline Bird, former President of Oxford University Poetry Society, who now has three collections published by Carcanet, has twice been shortlisted for the Dylan Thomas Prize and was made Olympic poet this year. 

This is not the first fundraising project that the Oxford group has embarked upon, in May of this year, OSOG initiated the distribution of hashtagged bananas around Oxford’s landmarks as part of Oxfam’s new Control Arms Campaign. 

Phil Coales said, “In the anthology’s introduction we spoke about the varying different arms of the campaign: resisting land grabs, climate change and food price spikes and promoting sustainable, small-scale farming.“

‘As a poet myself (one of the Foyle Young Poets of the Year in 2009), I think engaging the poetic imagination can convey the meaning of something in a way which even the most concise leaflet or description given at a Freshers’ Fair stall cannot do.”

Bagnall commented, “The anthology seemed like a chance to see what sort of poetry students were writing around the university, and whether it was any good.”

Amazon Goes Luxe

0

‘Shopping for clothing is so different. It’s much more emotional, it’s much more personal and I think it really requires more guidance, more insight, and it needs to be more fun and engaging’. Cathy Beaudoin’s words could be printed in a fashion magazine, but her audience is comprised instead of the world’s top financial journalists and analysts. As president of Amazon’s clothing division she is heading up what could be a major revolution in the luxury retail industry. The question is ‘will consumers want their Burberry in the same basket as a toaster, jigsaw puzzle and latest erotic e-book?’ or, put another way, ‘will e-retailers succeed where supermarkets such as Walmart have failed?’.

Retailing clothing may not seem such a major departure for a company which has already moved into other industries – for instance taking on publishing in a way which is already having profound effects on consumer behaviours. Amazon has sold fashion goods for years but what’s changed is a recent drive to recruit high end brands (including Vivienne Westwood and Michael Kors) and this marks a significant shift for the company – away from their usual price-slashing business model.

High fashion brands leave little room for price negotiation, their elitism is part of the point. Leading designers are weighing up the advantages and disadvantages of reaching such a mass market and the reception, from some at least, has been decidedly frosty: ‘Amazon will never sell Louis Vuitton, because we are the only ones that sell it,’ explains Louis Vuitton CEO Yves Carvelle. ‘This is a model of direct control that we pioneered, and I think long term it is the direction that most luxury ecommerce will take’.

Luxury brands, however, face other difficulties, which an official Amazon presence could help dispel. Amazon acts as a middle man for third party suppliers, many of whom are already selling high end goods (including Hugo Boss and Ralph Lauren products) on the site.

Amazon has been stepping up its fashion credentials. There’s prettier packaging for clothing, in-house fashion photography, teams of stylists for models – the company even sponsors New York’s Met Ball. The appeal of high end fashion is obvious – much better margins, with similar costs for the e-retailer. The question of the venture’s success however may come down to more than just economics.

The Good Natured

0

In 2010 I found myself at the front of Crystal Castles’ set at Reading – since then Gothic music has had me a tiny bit enthralled. I’m now sat round a table with Sarah McIntosh, her brother Hamish, and George Hinton, aka The Good Natured. Gothic is what they do. Only it’s fused with a style of pop that effortlessly ranges from light to loud and has a lot of people talking.

Being signed to EMI subsidiaries Regal and Parlophone puts them alongside names like Coldplay, Blur, Tinnie Tempah and Lily Allen. “They’re just a really great record label, we’ve been with them for a year and a half now, and all that time we’ve had time to develop and write an album and record it the way we want.” A lot of the artists don’t have such kind words for their label, but Sarah’s sound honest. “It depends who you sign with; we’ve been doing this for nearly 5 years so it’s taken us a long time to find the right record label. We didn’t jump into it, we played a lot of shows and fortunately for us we found a label that really supports us.”

Five years ago The Good Natured looked a little different. Sarah McIntosh was the sole member, writing songs on “an amazing old keyboard with loads of cool drumbeats on it” found at her grandmother’s house. “I started writing on that…to begin with it was just me singing over drum beats, playing really simple stuff – I didn’t really have a vision for it then”.

Aged 17 her EP ‘Warriors’ spread round the blogosphere, also receiving plays on BBC Radio. That led to shows, for which Hamish was recruited on bass, and when Sarah met George at university 3 years ago he joined on drums. A vision for the project began to take shape, and Sarah cites Swedish producer Patrick Berger as important in helping them realise their sound. “I ended up writing with him and that was when all our ideas really came together – he’s very creative with synthesisers and he just made it come alive”. The result isn’t easily classified: “It’s pop, it uses a lot of electronic sounds, it’s kind of got a punky edge to it as well,” but its dark emotions and gothic dimension are perhaps what give it its character.

“Bringing those dark emotions to a ‘pop’ place” seems to come easily to Sarah. The subject matter is serious without worrying about being serious, thought-provoking without thinking too hard. It conveys a sense of detachment reminiscent of Echo and the Bunnymen, or The Cure’s earlier work, but in a way which is far more direct and, well, pop. I think that detachment is conveyed by working the dark emotions it entails into a sound often associated with light-heartedness and fun.

They’re out to achieve a mainstream presence, and after supporting bands like The Wombats can’t deny the appeal of playing arenas –big shows are something they definitely feel “you can get used to”. And a debut album is now finished and mastered for which “the sky’s the limit”. That’s lucky, because when it’s released I think there’s a very real possibility it will explode. And Sarah isn’t worried by any mainstream stigma potential success might bring. “Katy Perry we all love, we listen to a lot – we always say we’re like The Cure crossed with Katy Perry”. Whatever your opinion of Katy Perry, I think you’ll struggle to deny this is impressive stuff. I guess I’m still a bit enthralled.