Saturday 12th July 2025
Blog Page 163

Why do we drink?

0

Some drink for good reasons. This might be a tipple after a hard day, or a few drinks and a dance every so often to unwind with friends, or maybe a vodka-mixer for liquid courage before a date. Some people drink for other reasons. It’s not for fun per-se – maybe it is at first – and it’s not exactly satisfying. Some people drink self-destructively, to excess, to shame, to falling over, to spinning out on their bed wondering what happened. I can’t blame anyone for these – we’ve all been there. University students are renowned, nowhere more than England, for their alcohol use and abuse. 

And yet I’m told that we’re drinking less as a generation – a fact that feels unreflective of my experience. According to SOS in 2022, 53% of students drink alcohol more than once a week, and 81% of them think that drinking and getting drunk is part of university culture. Something seems natural about drinking here.

I used to be adamant I’d never drink. It was a running joke in my family – I didn’t see the point. I had seen people drink in pubs and bars and I noticed them turn into grotesques of themselves as they drank: their tempers snapped quicker; their hugs got tighter. Sure, I knew that these emotions must have existed while sober, but I also knew that alcohol made it worse.

In my late teens, I began to see alcohol as something different: a social crutch. Alcohol didn’t change people, just loosened them, exposed them. They drank so they could say the thoughts in the back of their throats. Liquid courage. 

I first drank properly on my eighteenth birthday. My conviction about not drinking earlier helped me hold off for a while, so I lost out on the quintessential British Teenager Lifestyle, but the drinking won out eventually. I handled it well: I found that I could drink as much as the rest of my family and still walk straight. I had a jaeger-bomb at the end of a night out, something I thought was the guaranteed thing to get me very drunk but I just felt giddy.

Then I came to uni. Freshers’ week was uneventful for me – not a week of ragers, just tonsillitis. I was homesick and lonely, slowly adjusting to a new place with lots of new people I didn’t know. I met people, but slowly. Like many at university, the way I hung out with friends was through drinking. I knew I didn’t have to, but also that I enjoyed it a lot more if I did. This meant for a while I felt I didn’t know a lot of people very well. I think what I knew was partially a drunk version of them I had seen a few times and forgotten. They were almost strangers I knew very well. 

After I turned nineteen, I became better at separating these things, knowing that alcohol wasn’t a substitute for confidence. I became better at separating drinking from social interaction. I managed a bit, but still found my most stressed self reverting to a drunk night at Plush. But, I also found from observation that it wasn’t just me. I could see that people’s cravings for intimacy led them to drink uncontrollably so they’d meet someone at a club and be able to do something about it. Or they felt separate from the others in a club, watching people trying to connect in the darkness and seeing only phantoms dancing past them. 

I felt like a phantom. I knew that I wouldn’t find connection or meaning there. I mostly found myself sitting on the faux-leather stools at the back of the club and looking on. Or walking out at 1AM to go to sleep. 

Nights out had become a chance. When you weren’t seeing people in the day – stuck in libraries and at opposite ends of the city – the club was an enclosed space where you could imagine something different might happen. Different clubs, different venues, same space. Maybe you could forget about reason, about time, about differences. This well-worn routine is okay until you get tired.  Until you’ve spent too many mornings walking with a hangover, trying to both remember and forget. Then you try to heal, find what needs to be changed. You’ll do it again, and maybe it wasn’t all bad, maybe there’s a way that you can do it without the stress or shame.

The lines between healthy and unhealthy drinking are blurred and difficult to distinguish. I hear people say that drinking can never be healthy; that any drinks are crutches, coping mechanisms, or distractions. If you can enjoy things sober, what’s even the point of drinking? I reflexively kick back: “Could it never [be healthy]?” It might be an anti-puritan reflex more than anything, but I wonder if it is truly possible that there’s no joy to be brought from drinking.

For every memory of seeing people cry and shout drunk, I have the memories of people jolly and smiling like they’ve never done before. I remember the glow of a warm smile in a club dancing under the neon lights. An arm at your waist in abandon, linking arms with your friend on the way home. 

All of this to say that alcohol is everywhere in Oxford, whether you drink or not. While pervasive, it is almost invisible – it’s hard to know how to find the words about feeling uncertain about your alcohol use when so many don’t think twice before going out multiple times a week. Do you stay quiet and accept it as part of the way things are? Do you work on it yourself, let other people do what they want? Openness is probably the way forward – look at the reasons of others and yourselves, talk about it and be open to seeing how unhealthy habits form. Maybe the good reasons could stick around.

Image credit: Lawnpylon / CC BY-SA 3.0 via Wikipedia

Nearly £25k allocated to purging Oxford’s streets of chewing gum

0

Oxford City Council has accepted a grant of nearly £25,000 to clean up improperly discarded chewing gum, which they described as a “blight” on local streets in a recent press release.

The grant will be primarily directed towards steaming and sweeping gum off of streets frequented by students, including Magdalen Street, Broad Street, and Cornmarket Street. The remaining sum will fund specially designed signage encouraging responsible gum disposal. Environment Minister Rebecca Pow said in a statement that such efforts have been found to “[reduce] gum littering by up to 80% in the first two months” by participating councils.

According to the Council, chewing gum litter is a “constant source of complaints” from local residents, businesses and tourists. Beyond it being a “nuisance”, the Council noted that gum has the potential to inconvenience tourists; erode public feelings of pride in the city; jam wheelchair wheels; and stick to shoes to be carried into buildings.

The independent charity Keep Britain Tidy awarded the £24,960 grant via their Chewing Gum Task Force, which has funnelled over one million pounds towards gum clean-up efforts in 56 cities across the UK since its conception last year. The Task Force is funded by major gum manufacturers including Mars Wrigley and Perfetti Van Melle, but city councils are chiefly responsible for footing the roughly seven million pounds that are directed at chewing gum clean-up annually across Britain. 

In a statement, the Council’s leader, Susan Brown, said: “It would be really great if more people would dispose of their chewing gum responsibly in a bin rather than discarding it on our streets where it causes damage and increases our cleaning costs.”

Oxford City Council’s stated four key priorities for the city are to promote business and employment opportunities; to address an acute housing shortage; to reduce economic inequality; and to reduce carbon emissions in light of a climate emergency. While it is not clear which of these priorities the initiative is addressing, the cleaner does not use chemicals and is said to be housed on a repurposed 1973 electric milk float, allowing it to pass through the trial Zero Emission Zone in Oxford’s city centre.

No students faced disciplinary action for trashing, reflecting limited enforcement of ban

0

No Oxford students faced disciplinary action, including fines, for post-exam celebrations this academic year, a recent Freedom of Information request revealed. 

Since the 1970s, students have celebrated the end of exams by covering each other with substances including foam, food and alcohol in a tradition known as “trashing.” 

This year the University warned students that “[a]nti-social celebrations including throwing, pouring, or spraying substances of any kind” would be subject to £150 fines, to be “strictly enforced.” Similar warnings were issued in the previous two academic years.

The Proctors’ Office, the University’s central body responsible for student discipline, recorded relatively few citations for trashing in recent years. Last year, the Office fined eight students, while no discipline was administered in 2021.

In spite of the University’s warnings, trashing has continued as standard student practice. One student estimated that over 90% of his college year group took part in at least a “more limited form of the tradition,” with some students spraying water rather than foam and confetti. Other students, deterred by University security around the Examination Schools, simply moved their trashing elsewhere, such as to Port Meadow, an area of common land outside of Oxford city centre. 

In a press release from April, the University said that trashing causes environmental damage and worsens relations with the local community. The University estimates annual costs of £45,000 for trashing-related safety and clean-up services. Data from 2017 revealed that a minority fraction of the total cost went to cleanup efforts, with a significant majority directed at paying security staff. 

Last year the Oxford Student Union called the University’s fine policy “punitive” and said it would cause students “distress and upset.” They also argued that fines would pose a greater or lesser deterrent to students depending on their financial situation.

A University spokesperson told Cherwell: “We are pleased that so many students chose to mark the end of their exams in a responsible and respectful way this year. There was a marked decrease in antisocial behaviour, with students complying with requests not to litter. 

“The fact that there was no need to issue fines this year highlights our student community’s commitment to sustainable exam celebrations, and we would like to thank them for their positive engagement. 

“We will continue to ask students to celebrate sustainably in the years ahead, with fines in place for those who breach the University’s Code of Discipline.”

Voi crosses one million rides in Oxford

0

Since the start of the e-scooter trial in February 2021, Voi has numbered one million rides in Oxford. They have estimated that this has reduced CO2 emissions by 160 tonnes. Currently, there are over 68,000 riders registered in Oxford who use Voi scooters to commute to work, education, and social events.

Voi’s trial has led to more than 750 e-scooters being available around the clock. It started under the ‘Emergency Active Travel Plan’ of Oxfordshire’s County Council, to provide an alternative, socially distanced mode of transportation during the pandemic. The current extension by the government lets the trial run until May 2024. Legally, only e-scooters rented through this trial may be used in public spaces.

“Any journey that I can make shorter using a Voi scooter I will,” New College student Joe Thompson told Cherwell. “One of the main reasons I use Voi is because I have Chronic Fatigue Syndrome which essentially makes me not want to use up energy moving places when I’m already running on a low battery 24/7 anyway.” He explained that, unlike a bike, you do not have to lock up or exert any energy riding Voi’s.  

He added that Voi becomes extremely economical with a monthly pass as it removes the unlocking cost: “Before I had the pass it would’ve been different, I’d only use it for longer rides because the ~£1 unlock fee can be quite pricey if you’re using it regularly for short rides.”  

A survey by Voi among riders in Oxford found that 14.5% of its users were students. To encourage this usage, Voi provides a 20% discount to verified student riders. Wolfson College also established a six-scooter docking station in front of the College as part of its sustainable partnership programme. 

A voluntary service that patrols Oxford’s streets to improve women’s security, Oxford City Angels (OCA), also works with Voi. Since the launching of OCA last year, Voi has provided four long-term rental e-scooters to the OCA. The e-scooters help volunteers patrol large areas of Oxford’s streets efficiently and quickly.

In Great Britain, there were 1,369 collisions involving e-scooters in 2022. To improve e-scooter safety, Voi will host a free in-person e-scooter safety event at Thornhill Park and Ride from 8:00 am until 2:40 pm on Saturday 29th July. Participants will get a pass worth £10 to use during the session, 15 minutes of free riding time after the event and a helmet.

Aside from safety sessions, Voi also utilises other safety features to ensure riders use the e-scooters properly. To register as a rider, you need a valid driver’s licence, be above 18, and complete a safety briefing. During certain hours, the app also requires riders to do a reaction test to raise awareness about riding while intoxicated. Additionally, Voi bans reported reckless drivers to prevent injuries.

All Geography Prelims candidates allowed to progress to second year amidst marking boycott

0

In response to the UCU marking boycott, all first-year Geography students whose exams have been affected by the boycott will automatically be allowed to progress to the second year of their course. No Geography students will receive their marks before the 30th of September, the anticipated end of the boycott. 

Since the UCU may ballot its members for further industrial action, the students were told that no firm date could be set for the release of exam marks. The Geography Department informed students in an email seen by Cherwell that it would not retroactively prohibit students from progressing to their second year or require a retake of exams if they received a fail mark on any assessment. For such students, the department will instead “consider how best to support [their] learning and address any concerns over [their] academic progress.”

All this, the rising second-year students were told, is in line with the “procedure approved by the University, which is designed to get your marks to you as quickly and fairly as possible, while maintaining the rigorous quality of our awards, and giving you some certainty about plans for the coming year.”

The University-wide approach, Cherwell has been told, is that progression decisions are made on the basis of the marks available at the time of the exam board meeting. If some marks are available and include fails, then those fails will be treated as normal. If no marks are available, then all students will progress, with the marks being expected to be released after the boycott ends.

A Geography student from Hertford College told Cherwell: “I think the University’s decision regarding the marking of Geography Prelims exam papers is the fairest outcome of this situation. We’ve sat all our exams and submitted all coursework assessments. While I fully understand the importance of the marking and assessment boycott, I hope to receive some feedback soon.”

Another student said: “The other geographers and I are pretty relieved at the decision to automatically pass our exams. There was enough stress involved anyway, and we think it’d be unfair of them to handle it any other way (like making us retake them later on in Michaelmas etc.).”

As communicated in a statement to Cherwell, the broader university’s official policy has been “to recognize the right of [the markers] to take industrial action” while “working to minimize disruption.”

The University’s guidance for students regarding the UCU’s industrial action was last updated on 21 June 2023.

All delayed History & Politics students able to graduate after exam boards U-turn

0

In the latest development regarding the ongoing UCU marking boycott, the History & Politics (HisPol) Exam Board reconvened last week and U-turned on previous policy. All HisPol students whose marks have been delayed by the boycott will now be able to graduate, although many will do so as ‘Declared to Deserve Honours’ (DDH) and must still wait for their degree classifications.

The University has confirmed that out of the 58 students affected by the boycott (of a cohort of 59), 14 who were previously in ‘category 4’ and could not be classified at all because of missing marks have been moved into ‘category 3’ meaning they can be awarded a DDH. They join another 22 students also receiving ‘DDH’ awards which indicate that the candidate has passed the course but does not yet have enough marks to receive a degree classification. In total, 36 HisPol finalists (62%) will be graduating without classifications, whilst the other 22 (38%) will receive their degrees as normal.

Candidates with extensions or who have suspended still cannot graduate yet, but those who have been delayed by the boycott now can.

While the proportion of HisPol finalists graduating without fully classified degrees has not changed much, all candidates will now be able to graduate with some form of award this summer. This follows a U-turn by the HisPol Exam Board on their previous policy of preventing students missing just two papers out of seven from being awarded DDHs. This previous policy would have left a quarter of HisPol finalists unable to graduate, and was described by one HisPol finalist as “unjust and discriminatory” in comparison to the policies affecting straight History and PPE students – which in some cases allowed students missing half their papers to be awarded DDHs.

The HisPol Exam Board reconvened and the policy was changed on Wednesday 19th July, with students informed the same day.

Despite all HisPol students being able to graduate this summer, for 62% of them the lack of classification has caused worries concerning meeting employment and further educational requirements without classification.

One HisPol student told Cherwell: “Both faculties were very reluctant to acknowledge there was any problem here. We had to piece together all the evidence, so very much student detective work given the uni’s preference for things to remain very opaque.”

When reached for further comment, a University spokesperson again reiterated their general statement: “The overwhelming majority of examinations and assessments have taken place as planned. Students are being notified where there are any changes, and have taken all reasonable steps to ensure students are not disadvantaged by delays in the marking of examinations and assessments… 

“While most degree results are being released to students on schedule, if there are delays to results being released to specific courses, steps are being put in place to support students’ progression to further study or jobs.”

The University’s guidance for students regarding the UCU’s industrial action was last updated on 21 June 2023.

64% of History & Politics finalists left with unclassified or DDH degrees

0

Amidst the ongoing UCU marking boycott over 25% of History & Politics (HisPol) finalists have been left unable to graduate and another 35% unable to receive a degree classification. In response to their queries, one student was asked to please stop emailing. 

In an email to all HisPol finalists on 12th July seen by Cherwell, the History Faculty Undergraduate Officer confirmed that out of the cohort of 59, 15 fell into ‘category 4’ and “cannot be classified at all because so many of their marks are missing”, while another 23 are in ‘category 3’ meaning they have at least “one mark missing and can be awarded a DDH”. ‘DDH’ means ‘Declared to Deserve Honours’ and indicates the awardee has passed the course but does not yet have enough marks to receive a degree classification. The other 21 HisPol finalists are in ‘category 1’ and will receive their degree classifications as normal. 

The email to HisPol finalists explained that “this was a problem very specific to the DPIR [Department for Politics and International Relations]”, as all students in the main honours History school are able to graduate and only 18 are currently awarded DDHs. The Undergraduate Officer added that “we have been working twelve hour days six days a week for three weeks now to try to classify as many people as we could despite the [boycott]”. 

Initially students with only one mark missing had expected to receive a provisional classification, but it was subsequently revealed that the Board of Examiners decided against using provisional classifications. HisPol students who would have been in ‘category 2’ and received provisional classifications have been bumped down to ‘category 3’ and DDHs.

In response to a student inquiring about the Board’s decision not to use provisional classifications, the Undergraduate Officer said: “Seriously?! I’m still trying to enter MCE outcomes into eVision. I’ve spent enough time replying to your questions. Please don’t email me again.”

One HisPol finalist told Cherwell: “It is unfortunate that the History Faculty and the Department of Politics and International Relations have once again neglected the welfare of History & Politics students, but it meets the pattern of their behaviour. Time and time again, both departments have failed to properly support students in the joint honours school. This is just a continuation of that trend.”

The University and College Union (UCU) has been taking industrial action from the beginning of the academic year, following disputes between the union and the Universities Employers Association over pay and working conditions.

Disruption ranging from cancelled lectures, classes and examinations occasionally paused during negotiation ‘breakthroughs’, but these failed shortly afterwards. This most recent boycott was called in April, following a consultation with its members, and is planned to last until 30 September 2023 unless another ballot extends this further.

The University’s guidance regarding the boycott was last updated on 21 June, promising that “all assessments completed will be marked” and noting that “it is possible that some marks may be delayed”.

Those students falling into category 3 will be able to graduate as planned as a DDH indicates a student has passed the course, but worries have been raised by students regarding meeting employment and further educational requirements without classification. Those falling into category 4 will not receive their degree until all marks have been obtained, stopping them from graduating over the summer. Instead, they will be invited to rebook the ceremony at a later date.

When reached for comment, a University spokesperson reiterated that they “have taken all reasonable steps to ensure students are not disadvantaged by delays in the marking of examinations and assessments”. They added that “[w]hile most degree results are being released to students on schedule, if there are delays to results being released to specific courses, steps are being put in place to support students’ progression to further study or jobs”.

This article was updated to reflect comment from the University at 13:17 18th July 2023.

This article was updated to reflect the current number of students in the main honours History school able to graduate and awarded DDH at 13:05 19th July 2023.

‘He eagerly played the lead guitar whilst simultaneously thrashing a piano chord with his foot’ – A review of Jacob Collier’s Bristol concert

As part of the annual Bristol Sounds series of open-air concerts at Lloyds Amphitheatre, Jacob Collier, performed a stunning set which beautifully fused together elements of jazz, pop, rap, soul, and funk. Collier, a five-time Grammy Award winner has previously worked with major artists from pop and film music, including Coldplay, John Mayer, Pharrell Williams, and Hans Zimmer.

The evening began with support from Louis Cole, featuring eerie, electronic soundscapes. We eagerly anticipated for the arrival of Collier, and he truly knew how to showcase the ocean of his mesmerising musicianship when he ignited the stage with his energy. Barefooted and donning colourful patchwork trousers, Collier was in his absolute element. 

With at least 12 different musical instruments on stage, Collier tirelessly leapt from one instrument to another across the stage, cavorting and singing with childlike joy, supported by his brilliant band. The 90 min set was a heady concoction of Collier’s quintessential hits as well as covers of well-known classics. Traversing seamlessly through numerous genres, the crowd were catapulted from bluesy jazz to soulful ballads to playful funk. “With The Love In My Heart,” “Hideaway,” “Time Alone With You,” “All I Need,” “Sleeping On My Dreams” were met with deep roaring of excitement and enjoyment. A particular gem was his ethereal, acoustic guitar rendition of “The Sun Is In Your Eyes,” which delivered tremors through our hearts and took us all “by surprise.” 

One minute, he eagerly played the lead guitar whilst simultaneously thrashing a piano chord with his foot, before he swiftly switched to the humble tambourine. Another minute, he hurled a mallet at the gong with JC emblazoned on it, a trademark, quirky move that he often weaves into his concerts. 

Covers of “Somebody to Love” and “Can’t Help Falling In Love” allowed the audience to sing as part of his signature “audience choir.” Filling the Lloyds Amphitheatre, the audience’s sound built higher and louder as we harmonised together, with Collier orchestrating different sections of the audience to move up or down a note. The audience operated as a single instrument playing three-note harmonies, guided wholly by hand signals and body movements from the maestro. The angelic choral singing was highly atmospheric, a euphoric and deeply moving phenomenon that made this concert unique.

Throughout the evening, Collier’s vocal prowess was manifested through an immense vocal range and intricate harmonisation. By utilising looping and his one-of-a-kind harmonizer, built by MIT alum Ben Bloomberg, layer upon layer of Collier’s own vocals intertwined impeccably, culminating in a harmonic choir of his own.

Having bound off-stage after the sublime set as fresh as he had first emerged, Collier circled back on-stage in a kid’s toy car and treated us to an intimately stirring encore of “Can’t Take My Eyes Off You.” When Collier was performing, we truly could not take our eyes or ears off him.

“I’m a Black lesbian feminist woman, who is absolutely in support and stands in solidarity with my trans siblings.”: In conversation with founder of Black Pride and activist, Lady Phyll

0

Lady Phyll is a British political activist who advocates for racial, gender, and LGBTQ+ equality. She is a co-founder of UK Black Pride, a black gay pride event in London that seeks to celebrate minority ethnic queer and LGBTQ+ people attracting 8,000 people annually. Lady Phyll is also executive director of Kaleidoscope Trust, a non-profit organisation that campaigns for the human rights of LGBTQ+ people around the world, and an Official Charity Partner for World Pride. 

On May 24th 2023, Lady Phyll visited Worcester College for a talk with the Provost of Worcester College, David Isaac CBE, discussing her work in promoting human rights and her experience of growing up as a Black gay woman in 1980s England. Cherwell was able to obtain an exclusive interview with Lady Phyll following this talk, she tells us about her work and what she thinks of the future of Black and LGBTQ+ issues. 

Lady Phyll’s arguably most notable work is the creation of UK Black Pride, I ask her what led her to create the event. Lady Phyll tells me, “Black Pride as, I always talk about it, was created, was born out of, a frustration, where we didn’t see ourselves in mainstream LGBTQ+ activities. And we had two coaches loaded of Black queer people, especially women, going into Southend, and we realised that we don’t have a space of our own. We don’t have somewhere where we can feel liberated, empowered. And, you know, in 2004, we decided that there was going to be a space that we could call our own, and going forward in 2005 it was born, and it felt so good to have a Black Pride in the UK. Even when people told me there would never ever be a Black Pride in this country.” As someone who spent much of her secondary school education in Southend, I share with Phyll my experience attending Southend High School for Girls and despite the school’s seemingly welcoming attitude to the LGBTQ+ community, their treatment of Black students was bad enough that I left the school after GCSEs and have not returned to the Southend area since. Lady Phyll seems not to have had better luck in the area as she explains “When we went to Southend in 2004, we had the National Front stand on the side lines telling us to go home. But in 2005, we were too big. And they were a bit nervous, because when you’re more in numbers, nobody can tell you anything.” From Lady Phyll’s word, it is clear the ever-present threat of racial bias and attack still looms for Black communities in England, despite the National Front and other fascist groups from the late 90s and early 2000s are no longer as prevalent, there continues to be resistance to the assembling of people of colour, and in particular, queer people of colour.

I ask Lady Phyll what the most pressing issues that affect the minority ethnic queer and trans community here in the UK are. She tells me, “I would say, housing, I would say, job stability and security, especially post-COVID. I would say, poverty, you know, we are struggling. The rate of inflation is sky high. You know, young people can’t afford to buy. They’re often renting, and landlords are extortionate with their rents that are so high. And it’s hard, because if we’re talking about young, queer asylum seekers and refugees, their ability to be safe, and heal from the trauma of coming from one country that’s harmed them, to another country where they’re going to have to deal with racism.”

With young queer and trans people facing a housing crisis and a rising cost of living crisis, how does the government’s blocking of the Gender Recognition Act in Scotland create devastating effects for trans and queer people in the UK? Lady Phyll’s answer is firm, “Well, the bottom line is that it is exclusionary. I think that what we’re seeing now is this war against trans and non-binary people, you cannot have any form of legislation that sets out to support lesbian, gay, and bisexual people, and exclude trans people. I mean, do we not want people to not just survive, but thrive? 

“I think this comes from the stuff all around the conversion therapy. I think this government has a lot to pay forward in terms of how they’re treating trans non-binary people. The vitriol, the hate, the nasty propaganda is giving rise to so many people being able to hate on trans people. And that’s where you’ll have others lobbying their own MPs, whether it is in Scotland or whether it’s here in London, to prevent possible positive successes for trans people. People fear what they don’t know. And we’ve got to start getting out of this habit of debating trans lives and just letting them live.”

Lady Phyll’s clear support for trans rights rings clear in her words, how does she respond to those so-called ‘TERFs’, Trans Exclusionary Radical Feminists, who claim that they’re speaking for women everywhere? Lady Phyll is assertive: “They don’t speak in my name. I’m a Black lesbian feminist woman, who is absolutely in support and stands in solidarity with my trans siblings. And if we can all start standing in support with our trans siblings and non-binary siblings we will be better able to turn up the volume on society and make it difficult for them to turn it down on us.”

The TERF movement has faced a lot of criticism from Black queer and trans communities which claim that it is a characteristic of white feminism, a term coined to describe the exclusionary way in which modern-day feminism oftentimes centres itself on the experiences of white women. To queer and trans communities of colour, like Kenny Ethan Jones, it is poignant that in the height of the Black Lives Matter movement, transphobia has risen amongst white women. I ask Lady Phyll if she would agree with this characterisation of TERFs? She tells me, “Yes. Because if the issue was Black, feminist women screaming out or shouting out about trans people, no one will be bothered. Because people don’t often care about Black people and what they have to say. Many of the people who are absolutely vehemently opposed to trans people and talking about toilets, they happen to be white women who are also privileged and in positions of power. And they’re listened to. And I think that there’s something around this white fragility and white tears and white noises coming out. But I don’t want to just generalise because I think some people are also a little bit ignorant, because they don’t know what it means. They don’t know that gender neutral toilets are not going to harm you. They’re just going with the propaganda that’s out there. I don’t even want to call them TERFs. Because radical feminists are women like bell hooks, Audrey Lorde, Kimberly Crenshaw, Patricia Brown, Assata Shakur… TERFs are not radical feminists, I think that they are about this anti gender movement that is just harmful. I don’t even want to give them a platform or a name. Because once you give something a name you give it power. And that’s what we’ve done with some of these people that are speaking out against our siblings.”

In a world where white feminism seemingly dictates resistance movements, how does the Black identity influence the experience of being a queer person in the face of white fragility and weaponised white tears? Lady Phyll answers, “It’s hard. While I laugh and joke a lot, I am faced with the lens of whiteness all the time. And when our narrative has been shaped for us, we have to do something, to shape it for ourselves. Hence why UK Black Pride exists. Because we cannot have people telling our stories in a way that’s not reflective of who we are. So we have to create platforms, podcasts, etc to have conversations like this, so that you are writing up the truth about our existence that can coexist with each other as being Black and being queer. There are no stories that a white person has written that is about being black and queer, because that’s not the lived experience. Their norm is prides that look like them and feel like them. So it’s never going to look at the intersections of us being Black or Brown or queer and being from working class backgrounds. So we have to tell our stories. We really do.”

Speaking of telling our own stories, 2020 saw a surge in support for Black Lives Matter following the death of George Floyd. Many Black people came out to tell their stories of racism and racial injustice, and this was met with supposed support from various organisations and governments across the world. But did that truly create long lasting changes? Lady Phyll tells me “There was some real performative action that took place, black squares, which meant nothing. People saying, ‘Oh, my gosh, Black Lives Matter, what’s happening is terrible’, but then it died down. However, at the same time, there are young people who have still taken this forward. And everyone knows that Black Lives Matter was not a moment, it is a movement. It’s just that when there’s not funding and resources behind something, it’s so hard to keep it up or to sustain that level of activity. So yes, we’ve got now spring up groups that are doing things that support the work around Black Lives Matter, but it’s not coordinated. And what I think was missing was a strategy of what do we do now? And what does a tangible outcome look like? Or some output? What does that all mean for us? Because you can protest, and you can take to the streets, and of course, we have a right to be angry, but what happens after that? If you have no strategy, it’s going to fall by the wayside. Are you going to lobby someone? Are you going to lobby government? Are you going to create a safe haven or have some education tools? There has to be strategy behind everything we do. 

“If you ask me why UK Black Pride had lasted so long, because it’s very clear in what it’s mission is and what it’s vision is. And it’s clear about what it sets out to do on a yearly basis, but even on a quarterly basis. And that’s what I want to see for Black Lives Matter.”

In 2014 Lady Phyll was quotes in Gay Star News saying that pride in London has a long way to go. I ask her if the fake outrage and lack of lasting change against racism was the reason she said this. Lady Phyll answers “They’ve treated UK Black Pride badly. And, of course, I want to celebrate all prides. But when we’ve had stories of people who have been bullied, who felt victimised, who have felt racism in pride in London, it can’t be a pride for us. That’s not the pride that we want to see. So, yeah, they have a long way to go. And I think also pride in London needs to apologise to UK Black Pride and learn from us. If they want an intersectional pride. Learn from those who are doing it. Don’t just think that we’re in competition with you. Because us as black people, we don’t need to compete with you. We’re already amazing.”

Following the recent protests in Oxford against so-called ‘Gender Critical’ philosopher Kathleen Stock, and the hurt and discomfort that the Oxford trans and queer community currently feel, the Black trans community feeling much of the weight of this as statistics support the fact that Black trans people face some of the highest rates of violence and poverty in the LGBTQ+ community. I ask Lady Phyll what her advice is to the minority ethnic trans and queer students of Oxford is. Her answer is firm and loving, “That I see you. And I really want you to see yourself. We don’t get anywhere by just being complacent or hoping that change will come for us by somebody else doing it. Let’s get active. Let’s mobilise, let’s galvanise, let’s do stuff together, collectively. But also touch base with one another because we go through a lot. And sometimes we don’t talk about our traumas unless somebody wants to wheel us out for Black History Month, and they want to hear how hard it is to experience racism. Be there for one another, and just work with one another. When you’re down, you can hold her up when you’re down, you can hold her up. And that’s what we need, more people who look after us and stand strong together, stand steadfast with each other. Connect. 

“I hope that one day, we really understand that our collective strength is when we come together. We’re not looking for revenge from those that harm us as Black people. We’re just looking for reparations, we’re looking for an apology. But you see, those who don’t want to us in spaces of power is because they fear that we’re looking for revenge, and that we’re going to do exactly the same thing when we come together in big spaces, and take from them what they’ve taken from us. This isn’t about revenge. It’s about an acknowledgement of your privilege. Acknowledge what harms you have done to people, what your forefathers done to people and let’s keep it moving. Respects us, because we deserve to occupy spaces and places.”

English Faculty announces category system amidst marking boycott

0

The Faculty of English has announced different ‘categories’ for students who are affected by the ongoing UCU marking boycott. While most students are expected to be able to graduate this summer, those that won’t will face more uncertainty regarding their degree outcomes.

The English Faculty announced to students over email that each candidate will be placed into one of four categories based on how affected their exam markings will be.

Category 1, where all assessments will be fully marked, will allow degrees to be awarded as normal. Category 2, where one mark for a single paper is missing, will also allow degrees to be awarded. In the latter case, a second round of classification will take this second mark into account. Importantly, this could improve a candidate’s degree classification which would then be awarded, but will not be lowered in the opposite case, except in cases of academic misconduct.

The Faculty expects all “single honours students, and all but a very few joint schools students, to fall into categories 1 and 2”, meaning that most students will be able to graduate this summer.

Category 3, where too many marks are missing for a degree to be classified but where there is sufficient evidence for a candidate being able to pass, will qualify for a ‘Declared to Deserve Honours (DDH)’ award. This indicates the candidate has passed the course, without a specified classification, which will be updated as marks are counted. Again, students in this category will be able to graduate this summer.

Category 4, by contrast, will not be provided with a preliminary classification due to not having enough marks/evidence to be awarded an honours. In such a case, students will not be able to graduate in the summer, and will only receive a degree award once all their marks have been obtained. However, matriculated students will be able to re-book their graduation ceremony at a later date.

English Language and Literature and Classics and English students will be informed which of categories 2-4 they fall into by 30 June, with documents outlining the situation and outlining confirmed marks and pending assessments. These can be “shared with potential employers, or other higher education institutions”. However, given the nature of the boycotts, and its possible extension by UCU, specific dates are not available at present.

Those in category 1 will not receive any more correspondence until results are made available.

History and English, and English and Modern Languages students will be contacted by their respective departments confirming their categories.

While the provisions have been made to have transparency regarding the current boycotts and marking provisions, some students fear that this uncertainty may upset their post-degree plans, especially in situations where certain classifications are needed, such as for other higher education courses. One English finalist told Cherwell: “It’s frustrating to be put through this. You go through 3 years of grueling and difficult education and you don’t get to enjoy the fruits of your labour at the end, there’s a lack of closure.

“Now, both my further education [A-Levels] and my higher education [degree] have been upturned by a messy education system. There are deeper lessons to be learnt not just regarding fair employment, but the very nature of exams and how we are assessed as individuals.”

Another added that “while the vast majority of the students support the strike action as these are professors and staff that we hold dear, conflicts of interest start to bubble up. It seems students, and young people generally, get caught in a crossfire for a dispute they have no voice nor part in.”

The University and College Union (UCU) has been boycotting many parts of University life from lectures, classes, and examinations since the beginning of this academic year. Such boycotts have led to disruption to students, especially Finalists taking their examinations, with oral exams being cancelled in April as a result.

This strike action follows disputes between the union and the Universities Employers Association over pay and pensions. Despite some breakthroughs in talks, the ongoing marking boycott is planned to last until 30 September 2023, with the possibility of another ballot to extend this further.