Tuesday, April 29, 2025
Blog Page 1759

The perils of the role of a lifetime

0

There is a preconception that the role of ‘actor’ is a transformative one. Adaption, disguise and variety should be second-nature to a person whose job it is to act, however personal and self-centric that process might be (I’m looking at you, Daniel Day Lewis plus disciples). However, there are those that prove time and time again that success is not correlative with difference.

At his most box-office friendly, the close resemblance between the incarnations of Will Smith – wise-cracking, action hero extraordinaire – is spine-tinglingly uniform. Running from explosions, close encounters with the supernatural and a partiality for the phrase “oh HELL no” became a checklist for Smith’s agent in selecting scripts, as well as other prerequisites. Location: THE United States of America, where the world’s fate WILL hang in the balance. Julia Roberts also has a mantra to determine her choices – her typical role as self-help guru and heroine of empowered women who turn out to need a man after all (and less hero of the universe). Type-casting is not a phenomena peculiar to Adonis-like vessels, where performances play second fiddle to bodily perfection. The low, soothing resonance of Morgan Freeman’s dulcet tones has become the cinematic equivalent to auto-tune, lending wisdom and sincerity to any speech. He is like a one man epic-making machine, pulling off ridiculous explanatory material in his narration of War of the Worlds, and as God in Bruce Almighty. Samuel L Jackson, of ‘bad-ass’ fame, Cameron Diaz the goofy bombshell, Oxford alumni Hugh Grant’s stuttering Toff, and Prince Charming himself, Cary Grant, all seem fixed in the proto-type of their first, successful role.

It is then perhaps inevitable that a backlash of actors attempting to confound expectations (and usually to reinvigorate careers), seek to sample new waters. One can only sympathise. For them, filling in that ‘job description’ box on legal papers (for reasons including divorce, rehab and a dangerously over flowing bank statement) must provoke extreme existential crisis. Or at least a Hollywood-style midlife crisis. His CV stacked with explosion-dodging, Will Smith joined the swelling ranks of action heroes applying their strength and determination to their craft. Smith’s efforts in ALI and the Pursuit of Happyness were met with some praise, but more interestingly showcased another characteristic of gear-shifting roles. Rippling muscles are covered, hair greyed and dark circles allowed to show, with such drastic attempts at gritty ‘ugliness’ an oft used pointing device that shoves the gravitas of the role down the audiences’ throats. The proof is in the pudding, or rather, the Oscar, with actresses Charlize Théron and Nicole Kidman recent performers who exchanged their looks for the roles that would shift the emphasis onto their talent.

It seems slightly unfair that comedians be similarly judged for role-regurgitation, and on the whole, they seem altogether less bothered. Take the ‘frat-pack’ of Judd Apatow’s crew who frequent LA set comedies. Here the central story arch and situational distinctions are secondary to the semi-improvised frolicking that carries and characterises these films. Cynically put, there is a brand at work, but there is also a natural dimension to this trend. Actors such as Rogen and Ferrell, so closely involved with the writing process, are creating comedy in a similar vein to stand-up comics; the jokes may change but the temper and delivery is consistent with their own individual style. There is a sense that, given the intelligence and charisma of some of these performers, a wider range could be both possible and plausible. James Franco has successfully navigated a trans-genre career, acting his way from Pineapple Express to 127 hours, and the same might be proved by Rogen. His groove has so far been rooted in affability and a generous chuckle, though shades of sensitivity suggest a propensity for ‘serious’ drama. However, the necessity or desire for such a change is as yet, undetected, with Rogen currently attached to three comedies in conjunction with previous collaborators.

In terms of the ‘right decision’ as an actor, there is no route which necessitates greater popularity, or even growth as a performer. Robert De Niro’s semi-surreal comic exploits in the Meet the Parents franchise, and even more bafflingly in the dire Analyze That are living proof that groundless genre hopping does not a good idea make. In escaping the shackles of the eternally troubled criminal (of which his most brilliant, and individual performances range from Taxi Driver to The King of Comedy) De Niro has found himself in the altogether more dangerous grasp of pointless rom-coms. Apparently an upcoming film New Year’s Eve promises to deliver as few laughs as its celebrity-ridden Valentine’s Day counterpart.

So actors, beware, by all means extend your range, push your craft, just make sure to have an authorised adult with you at all times. 

Review: Antony and Cleopatra

0

I consider Antony and Cleopatra one of Shakespeare’s most underrated plays. Raging warfare on both sea and land, the tense political negotiating table, the tragic death of lovers, and the epic clash of incompatible civilisations; it has it all. Add into this mix Tara Isabella Burton’s inventive re-imagining of the play, transporting the action from Egypt and Rome, to Weimar Germany and America respectively, and there is the premise for something quite exciting in this production

 The performance is incredibly stylish. A completely black and white set provides striking food for thought, complete with chez-longue, pillows and film posters from a by-gone age. The costumes are stunning, I lost count of the number of different outfits Cleopatra got through in the space of three hours, and the use of film and radio was particularly inventive, serving to quicken the pace of a play that is, with all its to-ing and fro-ing across continents, incredibly hard to stage. Down to the last jewel-incrusted military jacket, the sublime aesthetic of the production made it stand out from so many others I have seen.

 Unfortunately however, despite this promise, the entire piece didn’t share the same attention to detail. There were numerous tech difficulties, even watching the performance on the third nigh of the run. Script in the film sections was often inaudible or muffled, lights failed to come up at right moment leaving the actors in darkness, and scene changes took too long– it seemed Burton was unnecessarily concerned with having chairs on stage for every scene in Rome.

 The quality of the acting did not live up to the director’s vision. Rob Snellgrove as Caesar was too wooden, spending most of the play unimaginatively with his hands clenched resembling nothing of a warlike figure, and I felt no sympathy for Enobarbus, whose plight was lost through Chris Johnson often muffling his lines. Nevertheless, it should be said that Catherine Haine’s Cleopatra was very well acted indeed, finding the perfect balance of sensual lover and aggressive queen, and Michael Crowe warmed up throughout the performance to eventually give a very affecting portrayal of Antony as he raced inevitably towards his tragic death. Fen Greatley as Mardian sings well and Agrippa, played by Sam Young, adds some perfectly observed movements of comedy into the world of Rome

All in all, if the production could have benefitted from some more drastic cuts and greater work on characterisation, its unmistakable sense of style, its courage, and most importantly, leading man and lady, made it well worth the visit. 

3 STARS

Fifth week in Oxford: blue or false?

0

It has come around again: the time when the flurry of new term excitement is a distant memory, but the end is not in sight. If you think you can see a light at the end of the tunnel, it’s probably just some bastard bringing you more work.  If you’re a fresher, chances are you’ve been warned about it in hushed tones by your college parents not long after you first set foot in Oxford. If you’re a second year or above, your dreams of the ‘fresh start’ you promised yourself, in which assignments would be completed  days in advance, perfect colour-coded revision notes would be made for every topic, and books would be taken out of the library in a naively optimistic attempt at ‘extra reading’, lie more crushed and broken than the bikes left outside Camera on Tuesday night.  It’s fifth week. The gloom descends.  It’s time for the onset of the notorious ‘fifth week blues’.

The blues have become as inevitable a part of the Oxford experience as the essay crisis, kebab regret, or being hacked, so much so that we’ve scheduled them in their own special week on the termly calendar.  The propensity for us all to get a little bit depressed come the middle of term has not gone unnoticed by colleges of course, and this week we’ll be bombarded with welfare teas, stress relieving workshops, and even, if we’re lucky, some sweeties popped in our pidge from the Christian Union in an attempt to cheer us all up a little.  It’s only natural that fatigue starts to creep in after nine essays with no break in between, and four weeks is just enough time for the work backlog to have built up in a seemingly insurmountable fashion. In short, we all need a break. Of course, having special provision there for when people tend to experience a slump can only be a good thing (I for one am looking forward to my fifth week chocolate very much), but I often wonder if fifth week deserves the infamy it has earned over the years.

Many an essay will not make it to completion and many a lecture will be skipped in an attempt to hold back the tide for a day or two, or just to catch up on some much needed sleep.  Maybe one of the reasons that we love the idea of fifth week blues so much is that it’s the elusive diagnosis we’ve all been longing for, the thing that justifies our feeling of being burn-out and give us the chance to shrug off a commitment or two without feeling so guilty.  Stress is always present to some extent during the Oxford term; fifth week blues give us an appropriate avenue in which to acknowledge it.

‘Fifth week is around the time your student loan starts to bite as well, which never helps your mood,’ adds a third year geographer, while a chemist tells me, ‘I hate fifth week.  Can we just eradicate it and call it something else?’

Perhaps in some way, the action of labelling ‘fifth week blues’ as such can turn out to be a bit of a self-fulfilling prophecy. Constant reminders from your peers that this is the week in which we are all destined to feel down may contribute to a kind of nocebo effect; placebo’s more sinister cousin. When you take into account the fact that all the tasks that seemed fairly straightforward and manageable in the first few weeks of term have a habit of multiplying and converging brutally upon you during fifth week, it’s no wonder that so many of us feel overcome with stress, apathy, exhaustion, and even sheer tedium. The concept of fifth week depression has become so reinforced in our mind that thinking and worrying about it, and reapplying it to our mounting workload, may indeed play a part in making it a reality.

All this begs the question as to whether fifth week blues are a peculiarity of the Oxford experience, brought about by too much work and too little play in a comparatively short, but very intense time frame, and whether they are based on truth, fifth week hysteria, or a combination of the two. Looking at our closest counterpart, Cambridge, the resemblance is strong. Our friends at the other place have their own version of the mid-term slump, dubbed “week five blues”, so I am told, and the furore surrounding them seems almost identical.

I spoke to a student there about his view on the blues. ‘I think people do start to get a bit more down this week as stuff can pile up, but the whole thing is blown massively out of proportion by making it into in actual thing,’ remarks Elliott, a third year engineer at Emmanuel College. ‘I mean it’s not as if by clockwork I hit week five and am suddenly depressed, it’s just more likely I will have work starting to pile up around this time.’

Like Oxbridge’s own peculiar answer to PMS, it seems that the blues take over both light and dark blue universities with some kind of regularity each term. But what of other universities? A media and art student says, ‘With us, I think people get more depressed at the end of the term; it’s like D-day anxiety, wondering if what you’ve done is good enough, and if you’ll be able to get all your work finished.  Deadlines are what scare people here, and those are end of term things.’

‘Plus,’ says a Belfast law student, ‘the bonus of reading weeks means the workload is taken off a little.’ A reading week! What a beautiful thought.  It seems to be salt in our wounds when all our friends at other universities are gallivanting around the country or dropping in to visit us at the time when we most resemble one of the Bodleian’s screaming gargoyles. It might cure the fifth week blues, but the likelihood of an Oxford reading week ever becoming a reality is fairly non-existent. Time, outside of the normal eight week term, is money for our colleges, renting our rooms to thousands of conference guests who they can charge far more for the privilege, and every week we spend here is money out of their pocket. Not to mention the fact that the Oxford term is steeped in tradition that the University won’t be willing to break for the sake of some undergrads having a duvet day.

It seems that the fifth week blues are here to stay. How, then, is it best to cope with them, if we can’t take the catch-up time that we actually need? One strategy is the cathartic approach, giving half a day to wallowing in the blues by closing the curtains, putting up a ‘do not disturb’ sign for your scout, and getting into bed with a 200g bar of Galaxy and your iPod switched to Damien Rice on repeat. This might help you get the melancholy out of your system, but obviously it’s not sustainable. Others prefer to reward themselves for surviving.  Focusing on the prospect of cocktails at Grand Café on Friday night might just help you to keep your head up and to get through the week relatively unscathed. Most of all, remembering that fifth week will soon be over and that it’ll be Friday of seventh week before you know it can be a cheering thought.

While an Oxford degree might help to make you a master of the ‘Keep Calm and Carry On’ philosophy, and it’s perfectly normal to have a bad week, the idea that misery is the natural state of the Oxford student is one that we cannot afford to perpetuate. It might be easier to dismiss the persistent negative feelings that you’ve been having as a side effect of the blues than to address them for what they really are.  One of the most alarming outcomes of becoming too much of a believer in the whole ‘fifth week’ discourse is that real depression, and not just transient unhappiness, can go unchallenged for too long.

‘Most of us will end up feeling down sometime during term,’ a student peer supporter tells me, ‘but we are probably made more aware of our deeper emotions at a time when everything around us seems to be centred on depression. It is perfectly all right to be upset during your first week at university, the night before a collection, the morning of a seventh week tute, or the evening of the end of term party. Just remember that if you do ever feel that you need to talk to someone at any time, your college and the university as a whole offer amazing support services for whatever issues, big or small, you may want to deal with. Most colleges run so many welfare events throughout fifth week, not so much because this is the limited time when a miasma of doom descends upon Oxford, but more as a “just in case” measure so that students know we are there for them.’

Shivering our timbers

‘Do you smoke? Do you want a cigarette?’ When you’re in Camera, and an attractive guy asks you to go outside for a cigarette with him, you know you’re in with a chance. If that attractive guy is Johnny Depp, and you’re in the Oxford Union rather than a nightclub, then perhaps you’re less likely to score.

Depp is famously reticent about the media. He gives interviews only occasionally and finds being photographed invasive. He has even moved to France to avoid the prying eyes of gossip mags and prepubescent girls. For someone so vocal about his privacy, Depp’s never been able to escape his initial image as a teenage heartthrob – we fancied him in Edward Scissorhands, and we fancied him in Pirates of the Caribbean. He’s been voted People Magazine’s sexiest man alive twice in the last ten years, and GQ thinks he’s the coolest man in the world. Depp’s not exactly obscure, however much he may protest.   

It is a pretty heart-racing experience then, especially as student journalists, to be up close and personal with this giant of cult cinema. Johnny Depp is a remarkable actor – he may not be the very best, but there is no doubt he is one of the most charismatic. On film and in person he has an intoxicating effect. If we’d only accepted that cigarette, it might have calmed our nerves.

Depp is beautiful – there is no other way to describe it – and yet he appears to be totally oblivious to it. His clothes are shabby, his blue-painted nails are bitten to the quick, and the infamous fedora most definitely has holes in it. A little bit of Jack Sparrow seems to have permeated his sense of style, or maybe he’s just lazy. His heroes – ‘the Henry Millers, the Jack Kerouacs, the Hunter Thompsons, the James Joyces of the world’ – have left an indelible stamp on him.

Fellow Kentuckian Thompson in particular was a dear friend, although you’d expect Depp to be from somewhere slightly edgier than Kentucky: his image is definitely more Fois Gras than fried chicken. Depp financed Thompson’s funeral after the gonzo master’s suicide in 2005, fulfilling his wish to have his ashes shot out of a 150ft cannon. Depp’s new film The Rum Diary immortalises Thompson’s early career in garish 1960s Puerto Rico, highlighting the hypocrisy and greed of the American Dream: ‘Me and Hunter started this thing when I found this box that had The Rum Diary inside of it. We read it sitting on bended knee. It’s what he asked for.

‘Having known Hunter to the degree that I did – well, he was one of my best friends. After I played him in the Fear and Loathing era, I had to go back and try to take slivers off, take layers away from the man I knew – to try to find him as that young journalist was a challenge. He was trying to find his voice, his avenue for all the anger and the rage. He did the gonzo thing before he was even aware of it. Then he just burst into the stratosphere.’

Depp knows what he’s talking about: he too burst into stardom after growing up on a diet of counterculture and chaos, moving around the country as a child (possibly desperately trying to escape Kentucky) and drifting into an adult life where he lived out of a car and tried to make it with garage rock bands. Perhaps this is why he’s so disarmingly charming – he had to get by on good luck and good grace. Not that we’ve met many, but Depp doesn’t come across as a Hollywood A-Lister. He speaks so softly you’d almost think he’s shy and he has an almost artificial awkwardness.

‘Everything I’ve ever done in terms of my work, and in terms of the films that I’ve done, I’ve been conscious that I just don’t want to embarrass my heroes. I don’t.’ It’s reassuring to see how earnest he is.

Depp seems to either play characters of pure fantasy – Scissorhands, Willy Wonka – or the exact opposite. Often the real people he portrays are ones he had some kind of personal relationship with.

‘There’s a huge responsibility playing someone who existed or exists’, he explains. ‘Donnie Brasco was an enormous risk.’

Thompson, his friend and hero, asked Depp to come on board for Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas. ‘He said, “Would you like to play me in a Vegas movie?” and I said that depends, you know, because if I come close to who you are, there’s a very good possibility that you’ll hate me for the rest of your life.’ Depp laughs, but that danger must always be there. If you get a little too close to the bone, the person you’re playing must feel as though you’ve bared the darkest facets of their personality to the world.

Luckily, neither Depp nor Thompson regretted it. ‘[Hunter] said the most beautiful thing in the world, you know. They screened the film for him and when I called him afterwards to find out if he hated me – I said, “Do you hate me? Is it done, do you hate me?” – and he said “No, no, no.”’ Depp pauses for a second.

‘“It was an eerie trumpet call over a lost battlefield”, that’s what he said. It just spewed out of his beautiful mouth: “an eerie trumpet call over a lost battlefield.”’

Johnny Depp has a lyrical way with words: everything seems to be considered deeply. He may not look the type, but he has an academic eloquence. He and Bruce Robinson, director and screenwriter of The Rum Diary, are self-confessed bibliophiles. In an attempt to make him stay a bit longer, we share a classically Oxonian tidbit of information: Oxford has the highest density of libraries in the world. To our satisfaction, Depp lies, ‘Well, I probably won’t leave.’ Don’t worry Johnny: you can stay with us.

Depp has had an unconventional education but he seems to approach acting with a certain intellectualism. He is often criticised by the American press for being a European ‘wannabe’, and he got into trouble a few years ago for supposedly dismissing America, his reluctant homeland, as ‘dumb’.

‘I dropped out of school, organised school, when I was 15. And I began my life after that in terms of academia. It is my entire world.’ He clearly styles himself as a bit of an anarchist: hates the media, hates organised education, hates everything we hold dear. He paid an impromtu visit dressed as Jack Sparrow to a London primary school last year after an appeal from a pupil asking for help with a mutiny: the work of a true rebel.  

His knowledge of literature is therefore mostly self-taught; Depp is evidently self-motivated. However, despite proclaiming himself a James Joyce disciple, Depp has yet to finish his greatest linguistic experiment. Briefly, the questioning is reversed, and he asks us ‘Have you finished Finnegans Wake?’ Ashamed, we  both admit no, and instantly regret it. As Oxford students we have a whole lot of practice lying about stuff we’re supposed to have read.

He smiles: ‘No one has.’ What a relief.

‘It’s the best fucking book in the world but no one’s read it. It’s either the greatest book in literature, or the greatest joke.’ We ask which he thinks it is, and of course, ‘It’s the greatest book.’ Does he think he’ll finish it? ‘One day – doesn’t mean I’ll understand it. I don’t think anyone ever will.’

Do we understand Johnny Depp? Neither of us think so; we don’t think anyone ever will. Unlike so many of his counterparts, he makes a conscious effort to remain a mystery. What is refreshing though is that Depp clearly doesn’t take his own mystery very seriously. He swears, he laughs, and he calls us ‘sweethearts’. He does chicken impressions in the Debate Chamber and claims Javier Bardem is the best ‘leading lady’ he’s ever kissed.

This irreverence is so refreshing, and yet, Depp is reverent when necessary. He evidently treats the people he immortalises in film with great respect, and nowhere is this more apparent than his latest tribute to old friend – and fellow enigma – Hunter S Thompson.

Johnny Depp spoke at the Oxford Union on Saturday

Education is still worth fighting for

0

This time last year, a deluge of Oxford students converged in London for the national protests against tuition fees. A year on, and the same cries of “no ifs, no buts, no education cuts”, are still being heard, but they’re considerably muted compared to the headline-grabbing news of last year’s violence at Millbank.

In the march on Wednesday, the protesters were practically outnumbered by police officers, in stark contrast to the woefully underprepared services we witnessed last year. The protests barely even caught the eye of national newspapers. Closer to home, applications to Oxford for 2012 have seen only a negligible drop in numbers compared to last year. So are we all resigned to the fact that government policy on fees has been irrevocably set?

Back in February of this year I wrote a highly optimistic piece for this paper after the University held its official Congregation debate on tuition fees. At the time, having heard rousing speeches from our dons promising to fight the changes, I was convinced that, however unlikely we were to make a difference, we should continue to take a stand against changes which would punish a generation for a financial crisis we didn’t cause.

Nine months on, I’ll admit that I was not among the number who took to the streets with my well-worn placard this week. Nevertheless, I still back those who continue to battle for free higher education.

Yes, there was a different tone to Wednesday’s march, with crowds making their way towards the city instead, almost reaching the occupation at St Paul’s. This perhaps reflects the fact that those still protesting are representing a cause that has spread wider than fees now to encompass opposition to all cuts. But the fundamental message of the march was that many students are still unwilling to accept a market in university education — a cause that will gain widespread sympathy from Oxford students, even if we’re all too lazy to hop on a bus to London again. The marchers were applauded by bystanders in Trafalgar Square, proof that many still agree with the fundamental principle.

An article in the Daily Mail this week complained that the protests were the “self-indulgent” work of middle class students studying for “mickey-mouse” degrees. If anything, these protests are far less self-indulgent than last year’s — on Wednesday there were no marchers who had come along for a jolly day out to London, rather, they were prompted by strongly held beliefs. And if there’s one time in our lives when we can afford to put ideology above pragmatism, surely this is it.

Murder in East Oxford

0

An unnamed man was assaulted in the St. Clement’s area on Wednesday night. He later died in hospital as the result of his injuries.

The police have begun an investigation and have already arrested four people, two men and two women, under suspicion of murder.
The area around Dawson Street, where the incident occurred, was cordoned off for Wednesday night and much of Thursday morning while police examined the scene of the crime.
The man was found by police at 8.42pm on Wednesday evening with serious injuries, the nature of which have yet to be revealed.
Detective Chief Inspector Steve Tolmie, Senior Investigating Officer, commented in a statement to the press, “We are at the very early stages of the investigation and a number of enquiries remain ongoing.
He also appealed to the public for their help, saying, “I would urge anyone who was in the St Clement’s area of Oxford last night who saw any suspicious activity or has any information about the incident, to contact police.”
This news follows reports of another sexual assault in Cowley earlier this week. A 29 year old woman was attacked by a man described to be “of middle eastern origin, aged about 22, about 5’10” and of large build.”
In a statement from Thames Valley Police, it was also revealed, “He has short hair and a closely shaven beard, spoke with a foreign accent, and was wearing a tracksuit.”
Sexual attacks in East Oxford are not uncommon, with five occurring over a period of eight days last June. Violence is also not unknown to the area, with various incidents of knife crime occurring in recent years. In October last year two serious knife attacks happened in one week and in 2009 a man was stabbed to death during the day on Cowley Road.
Claire Barnes, a Classics and English student who lives on Rectory Road off St Clement’s, when asked what she felt about the fatal attack was defensive of the area saying, “It’s horrible obviously but I don’t think it’s necessarily the area. I’m sure next time something like this happens it won’t be right next to where I live.”
She added that she was more concerned by the seemingly regular occurrence of sexual attacks in the Cowley area commenting, “You have to be on your guard, but then you have to be on your guard in any major city. Even the city centre is a place to be careful because there are just as many dark alleys and drunk people stumbling around.”
Ben Deaner, a second year PPEist who lives near St. Clement’s, echoed the sentiment that all cities are dangerous adding, “I walked past the police cordon about half two in the morning on my way home from Park End and wondered in passing what was going on. I don’t think the murder’s that shocking though, in fact I’m surprised this sort of thing doesn’t happen more often in a city this size. It doesn’t make me feel particularly worried because I presume there was a grievance behind the act. I find the sexual attacks more concerning on the basis that those attacks are random and could happen to anyone.”
Some were less accepting of the crimes, with one student who wished to remain anonymous saying, “As a student at a college where second years live out, I worry for my friends who have houses in that area. I find it shocking that such violence occurs on our streets. I’m from a small village and I feel much safer there: this wouldn’t happen in Wensleydale.”  
For the St Clement’s neighbourhood, Thames Valley Police have identified as major priorities drunkenness and alcohol-related antisocial behaviour, as well as drug dealing and misuse. Iffley Fields has been given the same assessment, and in the Cowley Marsh area anti-social behaviour has been deemed the biggest problem to be tackled by the police.

The police have begun an investigation and have already arrested four people, two men and two women, under suspicion of murder.

The area around Dawson Street, where the incident occurred, was cordoned off for Wednesday night and much of Thursday morning while police examined the scene of the crime.

The man was found by police at 8.42pm on Wednesday evening with serious injuries, the nature of which have yet to be revealed.

Detective Chief Inspector Steve Tolmie, Senior Investigating Officer, commented in a statement to the press, “We are at the very early stages of the investigation and a number of enquiries remain ongoing.

He also appealed to the public for their help, saying, “I would urge anyone who was in the St Clement’s area of Oxford last night who saw any suspicious activity or has any information about the incident, to contact police.”

This news follows reports of another sexual assault in Cowley earlier this week. A 29 year old woman was attacked by a man described to be “of middle eastern origin, aged about 22, about 5’10” and of large build.”

In a statement from Thames Valley Police, it was also revealed, “He has short hair and a closely shaven beard, spoke with a foreign accent, and was wearing a tracksuit.”

Sexual attacks in East Oxford are not uncommon, with five occurring over a period of eight days last June. Violence is also not unknown to the area, with various incidents of knife crime occurring in recent years. In October last year two serious knife attacks happened in one week and in 2009 a man was stabbed to death during the day on Cowley Road.

Claire Barnes, a Classics and English student who lives on Rectory Road off St Clement’s, when asked what she felt about the fatal attack was defensive of the area saying, “It’s horrible obviously but I don’t think it’s necessarily the area. I’m sure next time something like this happens it won’t be right next to where I live.”

She added that she was more concerned by the seemingly regular occurrence of sexual attacks in the Cowley area commenting, “You have to be on your guard, but then you have to be on your guard in any major city. Even the city centre is a place to be careful because there are just as many dark alleys and drunk people stumbling around.”

Ben Deaner, a second year PPEist who lives near St. Clement’s, echoed the sentiment that all cities are dangerous adding, “I walked past the police cordon about half two in the morning on my way home from Park End and wondered in passing what was going on.

‘I don’t think the murder’s that shocking though, in fact I’m surprised this sort of thing doesn’t happen more often in a city this size. It doesn’t make me feel particularly worried because I presume there was a grievance behind the act. I find the sexual attacks more concerning on the basis that those attacks are random and could happen to anyone.”

Some were less accepting of the crimes, with one student who wished to remain anonymous saying, “As a student at a college where second years live out, I worry for my friends who have houses in that area. I find it shocking that such violence occurs on our streets. I’m from a small village and I feel much safer there: this wouldn’t happen in Wensleydale.”  

For the St Clement’s neighbourhood, Thames Valley Police have identified as major priorities drunkenness and alcohol-related antisocial behaviour, as well as drug dealing and misuse. Iffley Fields has been given the same assessment, and in the Cowley Marsh area anti-social behaviour has been deemed the biggest problem to be tackled by the police.

Let’s talk POSH

0

POSH, which is transferring to Oxford in 7th week of Michaelmas from the Royal Court in London via the Fens has probably had the best marketing opportunity of any play in Oxford this term: two articles in the last week in national newspapers have plugged Laura Wade’s analysis of the suspiciously Bullingdonesque ‘Riot Club’. The director, Zu Quirke, was coy as to whether we will be able to spot any of the most famous Bullingdon members among the characters in this play, but has been brave enough to invite the Prime Minister, the Chancellor and the London Mayor along. So, who knows, if you head down to the Union in 7th week, you may be surrounded not just by your future leaders, who have apparently been very helpful, with Izzy Westbury keen on the idea from day one, but by your current ones too!

 

It seems that there will be something for all tastes in this production: a good story, black comedy-style, involving the trashing of a pub will entertain the drama lover, while the Unionista or general politics buff will be able to reflect on the questions posed about the ongoing dominance of public schoolboys in this University and in the Government, and do so while seated in what is simultaneously a great symbol of debate and a great symbol of privilege: the Union Debating Chamber.

 

Adding to the irony is the fact that Oxford drama is another area which suffers a certain amount of public school domination and Zu is not afraid to admit that the cast includes Old Etonians, Paulines and a selection of other people from schools with ‘names’, but also some from comprehensive backgrounds. Whether we should rejoice at this mixing or sigh at the fact that the presence of the two together is still a talking point in a company, this author cannot decide. If nothing else then, POSH is making us think: but Zu is quick to make clear that her mission is to entertain, to tell a story: it’s up to us to reflect, though she will certainly rejoice if people walk out of the Union discussing the issues.

 

POSH is an ensemble piece carried by the ten Riot Club boys, who range from freshers to finalists but are all experienced actors, and one senses that the bubbling energy that Zu exudes in our interview probably translates into a fairly manic experience for the cast in rehearsal, but it certainly seems like it will be worth it; and who knows, perhaps you’ll find yourself sitting with DC, Bojo or Oik.

UCAS proposes entire rethink

0

 

UCAS has just released its proposals for the most comprehensive review of the admissions process in half a century. Under the proposals set out in the Admissions Process Review, potential students would apply with their grades already in the bag.

In an ambitious timescale set out in the document, pupils would sit their A-Levels two weeks earlier, receive their results by the end of the summer term in time to apply over the summer, and start university in October. The majority of the changes could be put in place as early as 2016.

It remains unclear how the Oxbridge admissions process would adapt to the proposed system. Hannah Cusworth, Vice President for Access and Academic Affairs at OUSU, said this week, “Obviously there are some Oxbridge-specific considerations, primarily questions about when interviews and admissions tests would take place in a much tighter time frame.” The interview process, which currently takes place in December, would not fit in easily with the reforms.

The consultation document finds that “Young applicants would make more informed and mature choices about higher education if they were able to make them later in the cycle.” It also seeks to end the inaccuracies caused by predicted grades: statistics compiled by UCAS show that fewer than 10% of applicants have three accurate predictions (though almost 90% are accurate to within a grade).

Other changes mooted by UCAS include abolishing Clearing and UCAS extra, and instead establishing three ‘phases’ of applications: Apply 1, 2 and 3. This might involve only applying to two universities at a time, and finding out the results of the application on a specified day, which Louise Murgatroyd, a fresher at Hertford college, said would prevent “months of agony and emails to university admissions departments.”

One of the focal points of the review is an attempt to redress the difference between candidates from private and state schools, and improve access – to close what UCAS calls the “undesirable divide” by simplifying the system so those who might not have the support they need will not be disadvantaged. Post-qualification applications could mean that those who do better than expected are encouraged by their results and apply to top universities such as Oxford.

However, it is not wholly clear that the new system would in fact improve access. Cusworth outlined one key concern, pointing out that “Pushing the deadline until the end of June could mean that students from low-income backgrounds might not know what financial support they will receive until days before they start university.”

Russell Group Director General Dr Wendy Piatt also expressed reservations, saying, “we are concerned that the UCAS proposals might restrict the ability of institutions to make a fair and thorough assessment of applicants and also limit the opportunities for applicants to make informed decisions about which university to apply to…Most importantly these changes would do nothing to tackle the fundamental problem of the attainment gap which restricts access to leading universities.”

Student opinion is divided on the new system. Becca Schofield, a finalist at Somerville, admitted, “I would have applied differently, yes: I’d have gone for the universities I wanted, not the ones I thought I could get into,” but was generally in favour of the status quo, saying, “I liked how I applied: it made sense, and it made me work towards a goal.” Rio Jones, a student at Hertford, agreed, claiming that a conditional offer “gives you something to aim for.”

Abbie Cavendish, a current student at Hull University, criticised the system of awarding places based on predicted grades, saying, “the system allowing you to pester teachers into changing your grades is entirely flawed. My predictions were changed, and I got accepted to three universities, none of which I got into come results day.”
Prina Shah, who received no offers for medicine prior to her 4A*s at A-Level and is now studying anthropology at Durham, was in support of the new system because it would prevent manipulation of predicted grades, but cautioned against universities becoming too “grade specific.”

UCAS is now inviting schools and universities to comment on the proposals. The Admissions Office told us, “the University is currently consulting widely across the collegiate University about a response which will be made to UCAS in time for the deadline of 20th January 2012.”

 

 

OUSU mix-up over Union advertising

0
Tensions have arisen between OUSU and the Oxford Union, following OUSU’s failure to include the guide on the Union in their Freshers’ packs.
 
The accidental omission of the Union guide in the Freshers’ packs, which are sent out around two weeks before Michaelmas commences, was a breach of OUSU’s contract with the Union. It led to fears that Union membership would fall this year, as they usually rely on large numbers of Freshers signing up for lifetime membership prior to their arrival in Oxford. 
 
President of the Oxford Union Izzy Westbury commented, “OUSU apparently forgot to tell the printers and delivery service that the Oxford Union Freshers’ Guides were to be inserted and sent with the OUSU ones.”
 
The realisation of OUSU’s error was, according to Westbury, “quite frightening first off,” and prompted the Union to undertake a huge membership drive, largely through online publicity campaigns. The Union advertised itself on Facebook and Twitter, through mail-outs, and by releasing its Freshers’ Guide and term-card online for the first time.
 
Westbury said, “All in all, a huge amount of extra work was caused. I worked round-the-clock (well it felt like it…) to ensure that the printed term card came out a week early so that as soon as Freshers arrived they got them. The annual Freshers’ Fair was given a make-over and turned into a Student Survival Fair and we also hosted huge drinks parties for Graduates, Oxford Brookes and International students – all of which were a great success.”
 
Westbury explained that the publicity campaign proved successful, as membership numbers were not down this year, despite the “distressingly slow start.” 
 
“In the end, as in past years, 70% of undergraduates joined the Union,” she said. “Our Freshers’ Fortnight revolves around telling students exactly what the Union can offer them, and this year we succeeded as never before, given that the incoming students knew very little before they arrived.”
 
According to the President, “in midnight moments of frustration,” the Union considered taking “serious action” against OUSU, but decided against it. “Without them we cannot spread our name throughout the university to the extent that we do. Therefore, as I do not want to create a huge problem for next year’s Michaelmas President, we have decided not to take action. We have however negotiated with OUSU so that they have reimbursed us for the cost of the Freshers’ Guide distribution and footed the cost for the Guides to be redistributed to Freshers’ pigeon holes in 2nd week of term.”
 
“We’ve worked hard to create a good relationship with OUSU over the last year or so and I believe that we have achieved that. I know Martha (OUSU President) well and know that she’s doing a great job, but it just happens that what may have been considered a minor mistake by them had huge ramifications for us.”
 
She added that the situation had been “a nightmare, and I wouldn’t wish it on anyone.”
 
One student who spoke to Cherwell reflected, “I would have joined the Union anyway, regardless of receiving the leaflet in the post or not, due to the offer of lifetime membership.”
 
Juliet Roe, an undergraduate at University College, was not won over by the Union’s publicity campaign, however. She commented, “Both my college parents and my common sense told me not to join the Union.”