Wednesday, April 30, 2025
Blog Page 1761

OUSU condemn ‘no guests, no exceptions’ policy

0

Changes to the graduate accommodation policy, which deny them the right to have guests staying in their rooms, was overwhelmingly condemned by the OUSU Council this week through a motion which challenged the policy as “not a workable solution to any problem”.

The new policy greatly limited the freedom of students to have either guests to stay overnight, or even to have someone in their room in the middle of the day. It states that all tenants must sign a lease agreeing ‘‘not to take in guests or invitees’’, meaning that no guests are allowed at any time of day ‘‘with no exceptions.’’

The OUSU motion, proposed by Rob Noble and seconded by Jim O’Connell, stated that the rule ‘‘has the potential to cause, and already has caused, unnecessary tension between student tenants and the Accommodation Office’’, and that it is ‘‘an overreaction’’ as well as being “largely unenforceable.”

The motion suggests removing the new ‘‘no guests, no exceptions’’ rule and implementing a trial Head Residents system within this graduate accommodation. This would involve a certain number of students being appointed head residents, and having responsibility for reinforcing the old rules. This scheme would, according to the motion, ‘‘save time and money for the Accommodation Office because head residents would deal with most minor complaints’ and ‘‘have proven capable of resolving most issues by communicating with the students involved.’’ It added that head residents ‘‘can also improve social cohesion between tenants and organize rotors for recycling and other shared duties.’’

This motion had already been overwhelmingly passed by the MCR ‘Prescom’, and it has been noted that this is a system which works well in other universities and colleges in the UK.

Although the motion was passed overwhelmingly, there was a degree of skepticism. Alex Mayall, a student at St Catz, said that, ‘‘I don’t feel like someone in the house should be my babysitter, and I shouldn’t have to police them like I’m their mother.’’

However the point was made that these students would have volunteered for the position of head resident, and would receive a subsidy on their room. The motion stated that any loss of income to the university as a result of this subsidy would ‘‘be more than compensated for by improved tenant satisfaction and reduced workload for the Accommodation Office.’’

The reactions from students university-wide seem to be almost entirely in agreement with OUSU. Ben Hudson, at Regents College, doubted the effectiveness of the policy at all, ‘‘what a strange policy – I really can’t see it being followed at all.’’ He mentioned that ‘‘we have good relationships with the college authorities (the Principal lives at the end of our quad) so as long as people act with respect, which they do as a rule in the absence of these rather adversarial decrees, there are no problems.’’

However, there were some reservations from students who’d had difficult experiences with their accommodation. One St Anne’s student said, ‘‘I agree that this probably isn’t an entirely realistic policy, but I do know of people who push the limits. One girl on my corridor had her 38 year old French boyfriend around for a week and, from the sound of things, it seemed like he’d brought the Eurostar with him. Even worse his toddler stayed with them. He’d wake up every night screaming until they lullabied him to sleep. The system definitely needs tightening; I don’t think I’ll ever be able to listen to frere Jacques in the same way again.’’

He added, ‘‘rumour has it that one student even managed to hide Bin Laden in his en-suite for two days – it wasn’t until he took a girl back to see his weapon of mass destruction that he got found out. If that doesn’t motivate the need for reform I don’t know what does.’’ Cherwell has been unable to verify this statement.

Rob Noble, who proposed the motion, described the Acommodations Office as, ‘‘unusual for the extent to which it doesn’t communicate with students’’ and said that people who live in this graduate accommodation often feel, ‘‘no sense of community’’. Jim O’Connell said of the change in accommodations policy, ‘‘It’s patronizing…Graduates are often people who need to have overnight guests, for many different reasons. The Accommodation Office will only agree to [get rid of this rule] if there is some mechanism for making sure that in future people having overnight guests do not abuse that privilege, and head residents is the way to do that.’’ It was also stressed at the meeting that this is a trial scheme, to take place ‘‘in at least one large building before the end of Hilary Term 2012.’’

Geoff Nelson, the Hertford MCR Welfare Officer, said that, ‘‘Students should be allowed to bring guests into College rooms. It is what Oxford is mainly about – the collegial atmosphere, which includes hosting friends in College rooms for chats, the odd party, or a personal encounter. In return for this liberty, students should accept a measure of responsibility for their guests and their rooms. An outright ban is both unenforceable and an over-reaction to a very common problem.’’

FIFA thief at New College

0

 

New College JCR is in uproar after its copy of FIFA was stolen for the second time in a year.

This is not the first time that New College has hit the headlines for a gaming related story. In May Cherwell reported how a hoax email, ostensibly from Warden Curtis Price, was sent to all undergraduates.
The email read, “My PSN name is ‘newcollegewarden’, which I inherited from Alan Ryan [the previous warden]. If any junior members of College also play COD online, could they add me as a friend so that we can play a Team Deathmatch together?”

Both the Warden and New College students took this prank in good humour, but the FIFA ‘12 incident is being viewed as a rather more serious matter.

Mehdi Badali-Magtalo, a New College student and FIFA afficionado, commented, “This is a heinous crime. Dozens of people enjoyed that copy of FIFA. This is a torrid and despicable act. What I would say to the thief is ‘you can’t run, and you can’t hide’.”

The last time New College had a copy of FIFA stolen was over the interview period last December. Rumours that a bitter candidate took it after an interview went badly are unconfirmed.

On that occasion, FIFA ’11 was replaced by the JCR at a cost of £40. After this the JCR brought about a new system for paying for video games by which a certain amount would be allotted per term for spending on video games.

Current JCR Vice-President Louie Dane proposed a motion earlier this term which revised this system and set aside £200 for a gaming budget. He commented “I think it’s a real shame that someone from New College JCR could feel sufficiently alienated from our community to steal such a popular game.

“On a more serious note, however, I can understand why the perpetrator may have considered this the only way to stop my Olympique Lyonnais juggernaut.”

College peer supporter Arjun Pillai showed concern that the loss of the JCR’s copy of FIFA could have a negative impact on students’ welfare.

“Playing on the PS3 is an excellent way of unwinding after a stressful day doing academic work. It is also a good way for students to spend free time in the evenings without drinking alcohol or leaving college.

“I can only hope that students will embrace the rest of our games selection with equal enthusiasm while arrangements for a replacement FIFA ‘12 are underway.”

Replacing the copy of the game may involve petitioning the Vice-President for another £40 from the games budget, a move which could prove controversial amongst students who would prefer the money be spent on other games.

Other potential solutions to the crisis include a FIFA specific JCR motion or a whip-round among students who are particularly keen to FIFA 12’s return.

 

We Need To Talk About ‘Big Phil’

0

In ABBA’s 1977 hit single, Knowing Me, Knowing You, the Swedish group put it bluntly: “Breaking up is never easy.” In Luiz Felipe Scolari’s case, this was, at least first time around with Palmeiras, unquestionably the case. Second time around though, the breakup may be a little less impassioned. Public infighting with board members and players alike and an underwhelming Campeonato Brasileiro Série A campaign have turned Felipão’s dream return into somewhat of a nightmare.

After guiding A Seleção to victory in the 2002 FIFA World Cup Final, the Passo Fundo-born man decided to pursue his managerial career outside of Brazil – albeit with mixed success. Hailed in Portugal for guiding the National Team to semi-finals in both the 2004 UEFA European Championships and the 2006 FIFA World Cup, he endured a less than impressive spell in the Barclays Premier League with Chelsea. However, in June of last year, Palmeiras offered their former coach an escape route from his 8-year exile. For Scolari, the chance to return to the club with whom he enjoyed unprecedented success, the highlight of which was winning the club’s maiden Copa Libertadores in 1999, was an offer that he simply couldn’t refuse. The question was: Could Felipão repeat, even emulate, the success of 10 years ago?

Expectations at Verdão were, to put it mildly, high. However, reality soon kicked in – the times had changed since Scolari’s first spell in charge of the São Paulo-based club. Back then, football and the boardroom at the Estádio Palestra Itália very much remained as separate entities. Fast-forward in time though, and the aforementioned spheres are now almost inseparable. Indeed, the man known for his histrionics on the touchline has had his fair share of personal battles with Palmeiras’ vice-president Roberto Frizzo. Yet, the most recent decision by President Arnaldo Tirone to appoint a Director of Football, César Sampaio, a key member of the Brazilian National Team at the 1998 FIFA World Cup Finals, has been viewed as a significant shift in power in Scolari’s favour, namely, it will reduce the board’s influence in footballing matters.

Similar frictions have emerged between both manager and personnel. After the squad player João Vítor was attacked by a section of the club’s own fans last month, former club captain Kléber publicly clashed with the club directors and Scolari himself over the way the affair was handled. Felipão’s decision to permanently exclude the star striker from all first-team action opened up yet more divisions within the dressing room. Indeed, the breakdown in relations has permeated through to the heartbeat of the club, namely its loyal supporters. Following the team’s disappointing 1-1 draw away to Avaí in September, albeit playing most of the second-half with only nine-men, he was involved in an angry exchange with supporters who jeered the players. And yet amidst all the turbulence, Scolari can take some positives from his job at Palmeiras.

Up until the 21st round of matches in the Campeonato Brasileiro Série A, Verdão occupied a lofty sixth place in the league – a mere seven points off the current leaders Corinthians. And by the time the 30th round of matches came around, they boasted the tightest defensive backline in the whole league. However, lady luck also hasn’t smiled on Scolari. He’s been without two of his most important players for the majority of the campaign, namely the mercurial Chilean playmaker Jorge Valdívia and the aforementioned Kléber. Nonetheless, with frailties recently exposed at the back, strikers unable to convert numerous chances provided to them and with just one win in their last nine matches, Palmeiras have dramatically slipped from unexpected title-challengers to currently occupying 13th place in the league – just seven points above the relegation zone.

Whilst relegation from the Campeonato Brasileiro Série A would seem unthinkable for a club of the size and stature of Palmeiras, with just under a month to go until the domestic league reaches its conclusion, the club’s remaining fixtures are far from plain sailing. The most winnable fixture out of a tough looking bunch of games, which include a tricky meeting with Juninho Pernambucano’s title-challenging Vasco da Gama, a local derby against city rivals São Paulo and a final day clash away to current league leaders Corinthians, would appear to be against fellow strugglers Bahia – however even that isn’t a given. Ironically though, wherever his team does eventually end up finishing this season, Scolari himself will certainly not be short of job offers both from within and outside of Brazil.

Despite criticism regarding his authoritarian style of management along with Palmeiras’ failed campaign in this year’s Campeonato Brasileiro Série A, Scolari’s stock has not fallen significantly. And whilst he has stated that he intends to see out his contract, which runs out at the end of 2012, with his current employers before thinking about the future, speculation linking the manager with a move away from Verdão continues to mount. He has already received offers from abroad in the form of BeÅŸiktaÅŸ, FC Porto and clubs in the Middle East, to name a few. Nearer to home, São Paulo have publicly expressed a desire to bring Scolari to the other side of the city. Whilst an intriguing return to the Brazilian National Team set-up remains a possibility, given the pressure on current Head Coach Mano Menezes.

With 28 years of managerial experience under his belt, half of those spent outside of his homeland, the Gene Hackman and Don Corleone look-alike will undoubtedly think long and hard about his next managerial move. Whichever path Scolari does decide to follow, be it in the short or long-term, one thing is for sure: ‘Big Phil’ will not be leaving the world of football behind quietly or in a hurry.

Twitter: @aleksklosok

Letters from me to Gareth: Los Campesinos! interview

0

It is difficult to start writing about Los Campesinos! without falling into the same traps of lazy journalism or hipster elitism that have ensnared the band’s reputation for the last five years. Whether describing them as twee-popping indie kids, or miserablist emos (inaccurately in either case), there has always been something of a sense, amongst your more worthy musoes, that here is a band that, in all seriousness, you shouldn’t really admit to liking. In the playground of Pitchfork Elementary, Los Campesinos! is for girls. To accept any such bullshit, however, would be to ignore a band that, since 2008’s Hold on Now, Youngster, have produced four outstanding albums, with a consistent quality that has masked a manifestly developing style. Gone are the glockenspiels, boy-girl duets and cartoon record sleeves; in their place Hello Sadness.

‘You do not like us ‘cos your girlfriend likely does,’ taunts singer Gareth Campesinos! on the second track of the album, and you can’t help but feel he has in mind some of the lasting perceptions of the band that, by this stage, he is clearly tiring of. ‘We brought it upon ourselves at first,’ he tells me, ‘just getting excited and carried away at being in a band, the fact that people were labelling us as anything was exciting. But now the twee thing doesn’t amount to much more than laziness from people who don’t know what twee is.’ In truth though, it was never an epithet that was really fitting. Los Campesinos! have always been ‘far too ballsy and aggressive, and sort of far too… honest’, to be thought of as just another cardigan at the vintage fair of pop music. Perhaps an even less predictable misconception about the band stems from their origins as students at Cardiff University, although admittedly it’s a less toxic fiction: ‘If it wasn’t for sport,’ says Gareth, ‘I probably wouldn’t care that we were described as being Welsh.’

Sport, and specifically football, has been a constant reference point across all of Los Campesinos!’ records, to the bafflement of some of their more indie-traditionalist fans. ‘I think there’s still sort of a disagreement between people who like alternative, real music, and people who like such a popular, masculine sport as football,’ observes Gareth, although clearly it’s no opposition in his mind. For a while the interview devolves into a discussion of nineties football management games and the new faces of Umbro’s England football shirt campaign (‘I don’t anticipate us getting asked to advertise anything like that, although I’m sure my football knowledge is far greater than Kasabian’s.’)  Gareth, it transpires, is a lifelong fan of Welton Rovers (currently plying their trade in Western Football League Division One), having had a season ticket ‘since I was old enough that my mum would let me go out when it was cold.’ And this, I think, regardless of what PE-dodging indie types might tell you (too scared to muddy their Belle & Sebastian t-shirts), is important.

Because supporting a football team, really supporting a football team, is just as unreasonable and passionate a romance as any true love. The rituals of intense devotion, wounded pride and habitual humiliation familiar to any lower-league football fan can surely only inform Gareth’s unique perspective on love and heartbreak on Hello Sadness: ‘It’s only hope that springs eternal’, begins the chorus of the title track, ‘and that’s the reason why/This dripping from my broken heart/Is never running dry’, while ‘Every Defeat a Divorce’, tellingly subtitled ‘Three Lions’, expresses an enduring faith, never disillusioned by failure, as appropriate to the football fan as it is to the hopeless romantic: ‘Every defeat a divorce/Although I look surprised/It’s par for the course I guess.’

Sport and pop music share a peculiar ability to inspire and nurture a uniquely obsessive dedication, and it is perhaps again to some extent the formative years on the terraces that have produced such a reciprocal relationship between Los Campesinos! and their disciples. Strengthened recently through self-published fanzine, Heat Rash, available to subscribing devotees, the close connection between band and public is something that has always been apparent at their live shows. ‘I just don’t understand why every band wouldn’t be like that,’ says Gareth, ‘the hierarchy of fans being underneath and feeding into the band isn’t something that sits comfortably with us. And chances are there’s a lot of people who watch our shows that we’d be mates with in real life.’ Although he is careful to qualify this (‘You do meet a lot of people who are just dickheads and really irritating.’) he maintains that, ‘by and large, it’s an absolute pleasure meeting all these people.’

There is a team ethic to Los Campesinos! as impressive as anything in the Premier League (last one…). Gareth rarely uses the first-person singular, seemingly naturally to prefer a more democratic ‘We’. Despite the band’s shifting line-up over the past couple of years, it seems he feels like he has now picked his first team (okay…): ‘We’re the happiest now we’ve ever been, the most focused and the most united, and the most capable of actually creating something lasting’; there is a desire to be more than ‘just another band with a few albums lined up in HMV.’ Clearly evident is a real sense of confidence, but one refreshingly short of ego, as he begins to conclude, ‘I think we’re capable of being something slightly,’ pausing bashfully, as if to make sure, ‘ever so slightly, special.’

This confidence in the band’s own ability and significance, if expressed shyly over the phone, is worn firmly on the sleeve of Hello Sadness. With Los Campesinos!, emotions have never been too deeply beneath the surface: ‘I’ve got into a situation where I want to write a lot more honestly, and perhaps only feel that honestly is the only way I’m capable of writing,’ admits Gareth. From the start, his song writing has been open and confessional, his delivery earnest and sincere. What saves it from pretension or self-indulgence – and in my opinion what separates the Morrisseys and Bowies of this world from the Bonos and Stings (apart from the not having fucking stupid names) – is the ability to be really funny, even (especially) when singing sad songs. The effect, on Hello Sadness, is one of real catharsis; emerging from the despondently triumphant closing track with the same lift that follows a night spent crying your heart out.

In the press surrounding the album, there is a great deal of talk about growing up. ‘When we formed we were in our second year of university,’ Gareth explains, ‘We weren’t real people yet. I suppose we’ve done all the proper adult growing up whilst being in the band.’ And the whole process has been captured on record, both in terms of the musical development, ‘five years of learning to write songs released on albums’, and psychologically, through the camera obscura of Gareth’s candid song writing. Hello Sadness takes as its emotional backdrop the end of a relationship. Two weeks before recording, Gareth split up with his girlfriend. ‘I guess it was both terrible and perfect timing,’ he tells me. ‘It was a weird headspace to have going into writing an album, but also it was a brilliant time to be going away with my mates to Spain to record and to drink and dick about.’

‘I’d written 2 or 3 songs very much form the point of view of being happy and in a relationship and then as soon as that ended it didn’t feel appropriate anymore and wasn’t the sort of thing I was wanting to put down onto a record. So I scrapped it and started again. I didn’t really start writing until we found ourselves in the studio.’ There is a bare authenticity to the lyrics of songs like ‘Baby I Got The Death Rattle’ and ‘Light Leaves, Dark Sees, part II’, a vulnerability bitterly picked from the fresh scabs of a relationship: ‘The pain of the silence before bed/Oh for the sound of your pissing through the thin walls or stroking your head.’ The break-up, says Gareth, meant that ‘everything written before then became void.’

‘I think it feels equally the same band and completely different,’ he admits, and Hello Sadness is saturated with dampened echoes of a past still audible, yet somehow beyond reach: the scratching guitars that open ‘Songs About Your Girlfriend’, like those of an early EP, now surrounded by the unsettling hiss of distant radio noise; the opening chords of ‘To Tundra’ like ghostly reverberations of those on breakthrough single ‘You! Me! Dancing!’, only now, instead of building to raucous primary-coloured abandon, levelling out into minor-key phantasmagoria, all twinkling keys and atmosphere, as desolate as the permafrost evoked in the title. While the themes remain the same – love, loss, heartbreak – this is no longer teenage anguish, yet while recoiling as strongly as ever against the lethargy of ‘maturity’, it is certainly a more grown up kind of despair. 

Review: OUO Michaelmas Concert

0
The concert saw Oxford University Orchestra out in force, with a huge orchestra that raised the roof with the epic Mahler’s 5th, and the curious appendage of Stravinsky’s Symphonies of Wind Instruments.
With the opportunity to conduct Mahler’s 5th symphony, it was up to Geoffrey Paterson to wring every ounce of emotion from this beautiful and substantial work, a task in which he no doubt succeeded. For me however, there were times when it felt as though too much was being forced from every nuance in the music, which became emotionally exhausting and removed some of the effect of those ‘big moments’ that the composer had designated. By the same token, though, conducting Mahler, like singing Wagner, is a chance to indulge in some of the most expansive and emotionally rich music in the repertoire and if there is ever a time to over-indulge, then Mahler is a more forgiving composer than most. Personally, though, there was no doubt that the highlight of the concert was the Adagietto, which, despite some tuning issues, featured a higher level of subtlety and really allowed the orchestra to engage more naturally with the music.
 
The sheer volume of the symphony was impressive in itself, with seemingly every inch of floorspace being occupied by a performer. This translated to some brilliant, thrilling explosions, particularly after the introductory fanfare and, of course, in the finale. However, given the high level of proficiency that we have come to expect from OUO in the past, there were one or two unfortunate slip-ups from soloists, particularly from the brass, that detracted from the overall effect. By contrast, the woodwind section were consistently outstanding, with gorgeous solos from Julian Scott and Claire Wickes who put just the right amount of zest into some of the symphony’s more intimate moments.
 
Stravinsky’s Symphonies of Wind Instruments was, in my opinion, an unconventional choice to accompany Mahler’s 5th in the programme, although I suspect that time constraints were the primary reason for the inclusion of this heavily contrasting work. Here, Paterson’s highly expressive approach was less appropriate. The metric regularity that can make this piece of ‘cubist’ music so exciting and unusual was subject to lagging from a slow starting tempo, and the ensemble really did not feel together at times. That said, the sheer audacity of performing the work – and with it, the chance to hear the interlocking textures and shifting strata of twentieth-century harmony – warranted its place in the programme. Unfortunately, it felt both dwarfed and under-prepared in comparison with the Mahler symphony and didn’t offer a podium for the excellent woodwind section as it might have done.
 
Despite counterintuitive programming, the concert proved to be both thrilling and sensuous, though not without its flaws. To even attempt the virtuosic Mahler symphony and the Stravinsky demonstrates the excellent standard that OUO is operating at and to hear them both was a genuine pleasure, regardless of some decisions made by the conductor and concert programmer that, ultimately, come down to personal taste.

Police crackdown on cyclists

0

The police have begun a crackdown on cyclists cycling without lights.

162 people were handed ₤30 fixed penalty notices during the three-hour operation last Wednesday, 2nd November, at an average of just under one fine per minute.

Those caught circulating with only one working light were ordered to get off their bicycles and walk.

Haydon Croker, a second-year at St Hilda’s, was stopped outside the Queen’s College on the High Street for not making himself visible enough to other traffic.

“I was cycling back to college at about 8pm when a policeman pulled me over. He was really nice about whole deal”, he said.

A spokeswoman for Thames Valley Police told Cherwell that the fine will be waived if those caught prove that they have bought lights by presenting a receipt.

“It’s a good idea; it got me to buy lights”, said Croker of the opportunity to get his fine revoked.

He added, “The policeman who fined me said that the next thing they’ll be cracking down on is cyclists going through red lights.”

Thames Valley Police has highlighted the importance of cycle safety in Oxford, Road Safety Constable Mark Pilling saying, “What our figures show is that all casualties are down, except pedal cyclists where casualties have increased by 10 per cent.”

Attempts to make Oxford’s streets safer for cyclists come in the wake of the death of Joanna Braithwaite, who was killed when her bicycle crashed with a cement mixer on Woodstock Road at the end of October.


Brookes bids to extend licence

0

Residents in Headington are fighting a bid by Oxford Brookes to obtain an alcohol and entertainment licence for their Gipsy Lane campus.

The proposal, which has already been withdrawn once following an objection from a local city councillor, would permit the sale of alcohol every day until 11pm.

The University is also seeking permission to extend licensed activities, which include live music performances, until 2am on twelve occasions per year, and twice for the entire night.

Many residents are deeply opposed to the application, which they claim will disrupt life for people living near the campus. Margaret Conway, of Headington Hill, said, “It will be a party time district right beside major residential areas.”

There is further anger over the way in which Oxford Brookes has made the application. Joe McManners, the councillor for Churchill Ward who persuaded the university to resubmit the plans, said, “I was concerned that people had not been properly consulted.”

Conway’s husband, Ken Lovesy, agreed with the councillor, saying that the University was “trying to slip a blanket proposal under the radar” and that locals faced “a nightmare world of noise pollution and rowdy behaviour”.

Oxford Brookes, which has three main campuses, initially requested permission for activities to go on until 11.30pm every day, as well as the fourteen extended evenings. In a poll for the Oxford Mail, 69% of people objected to those hours.

The University has said that there are no plans to open a student bar on the site, or to use the licence for the purposes of raising income. In a letter to residents dated 30th September 2011, Amanda Ashworth-Plant, Oxford Brookes’ Head of Campus Operations, sought to reassure locals that “the site will remain a place of teaching and study without student accommodation”.

She did admit, however, that “there may be occasional events at which the University would like to be able to charge for the supply of drinks”, including “receptions, ceremonies and end of term events”.

Brookes students have mixed feelings about the dispute. James Buckland, a first year Film Studies student, pointed out that drinks events on university sites were often “far safer than going into town”. But he accepted that “loud, drunken messy teenagers” could be a nuisance for neighbours.

Another student at the university took a harsher approach, telling Cherwell, “the University is entitled to use its premises in any way it sees fit”. He pointed out that local people often made use of facilities provided by the university, and dismissed criticism of the plans as an “outcry from a vocal minority”.

Edward Reed, a spokesman for Brookes, defended the application as little more than an attempt to reduce paperwork. In a statement to Cherwell, he said, “Oxford Brookes is not changing the nature of the licensable activities taking place on its campuses. The premises licences, one for each site, are to cover events such as graduations, student plays and concerts including those when there are no alcohol sales taking place.”

Asked about whether the local community could benefit from events taking place on the campus, Reed gave the example of the ‘Open Lectures Series’, which recently featured Niall McNevin, a former Brookes student, now leading the legacy element of the Olympic Park for London 2012. The lectures are all open to the public, with “wine and nibbles” laid on.
                   
Oxford Brookes students have a history of tension with local residents, especially concerning behaviour late at night. In November 2008, members of the Oxford Brookes Rugby Club were banned from playing for the team after an alcohol-related disturbance at the Hobgoblin pub, on Cowley Road. In April last year the university launched a campaign to educate students about the health risks of excessive alcohol consumption.

However, Matthew Tallant, a first year student at Brookes, denied that a particularly bad drinking culture existed at the university, saying it was “fairly usual, with the majority simply falling into the social drinking category”. In his experience, he said, “when drinking, the mood is always friendly and not forced upon people”.


Preview: Antony and Cleopatra

0

The problem with Shakespeare’s Roman plays is that since every director wants to put their own stamp on a production, wants to say something new and different, often the very specifically Roman history and politics of these plays ends up being transferred to another time. Unfortunately, this was the trap that I felt this production fell in to. I know it’s all very boring and purist to do it all historical, but there is a reason that a lot of productions keep the Roman plays Roman and that is because this is what makes the most sense.

In Burton’s production, Egypt becomes the Germany of the Weimar republic, all in black and white, with Rome – its generals bedecked rather jauntily with sparkly plastic jewel-encrusted military jackets – as a Technicolor America. I will be honest, though, I only got this once the director had explained it to me, so I found it a little distracting trying to work out which country Egypt was meant to represent and which country Rome was. It looks wonderful, and the production is full of stylish visual touches, but it just didn’t make sense to me that even the Romans who throughout the play talk in the language of measurement and control, the Egyptians are the ones associated with the fascists. Of course, Rome has to be America, because in the modern history this is mapped on to, America wins the war, but it doesn’t fit quite right with the events of the original setting.

That is not to say that I did not like this production. I liked it very much and there were lots of wonderful touches that made it very lively and funny. Enobarbus’ iconic speech ‘The barge she sat in like a burnished throne…’ etc. was played as a voiceover on a black and white film showing Cleopatra and Anthony frolicking around that was really very effective, and in fact the entire Egyptian court were wonderful and the production is entirely worth seeing for Catherine Haines’ Cleopatra who perfectly accomplishes combining Cleopatra’s infinite variety and her capricious game-playing with her power and presence. The Egyptians all lie around on the floor stroking one another, while the Romans sit apart on hard chairs talking stiffly. The contrast is beautifully made, but then again this transposition in time caused me problems. Why would the decadent Egypt be aligned with a black-and-white bleak fascist state?

But then, this does open up other possibilities that keeping it within the correct (sorry, that’s just the way it is) historical setting would shut down. By transposing it through time, Burton has shifted the power relationship between Anthony and Caesar. Instead of hard-edged, calm and in control, Rob Snellgrove’s Caesar is nervous, almost squirrelly, totally intimidated by the suave and manipulative Anthony. It’s very interesting and it’s very different. The only problem is, since the text is (quite rightly) left exactly how it is with all the names and the historical references so we know that Caesar is the man who will eventually become Augustus ruler of the known world. It was interesting and it was powerful, but I just couldn’t buy into this portrayal of Octavian, I just couldn’t believe in this Caesar as the man who would eventually rule the world. Perhaps he was modelled on some real historical character, and perhaps it is because of my ignorance that I am missing the nuance, but for me, it didn’t quite sit right.

But, having said all of this, this is definitely a production worth seeing. So, I didn’t agree with the way it was done, and I didn’t really get the change in historical setting, but at least it was something a bit different, a bit provocative. I could have gone to another production with them all wearing togas, and I would probably have liked it more, but then I wouldn’t have had any kind of reaction to it like this. Much better to see a production that makes you think, even if it makes you disagree. This is an Anthony and Cleopatra that is something that is a bit different, and all of the acting in it is excellent. It’s well worth seeing; the cast are really great and it’s well-paced and full of engaging extras with the film clips and some music. Who knows, maybe you’ll get it and it is my shocking lack of historical knowledge that stopped me loving this production, but at least this one gives one something to really get into and discuss, and hey – you don’t all have to read about how lovely and authentic I thought those who did the costumes had made the togas. 

3 STARS


Shooting statues

0

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%4283%%[/mm-hide-text]

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%4284%%[/mm-hide-text]

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%4285%%[/mm-hide-text]

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%4286%%[/mm-hide-text]

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%4287%%[/mm-hide-text]

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%4288%%[/mm-hide-text]

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%4289%%[/mm-hide-text]

 

[mm-hide-text]%%IMG_ORIGINAL%%42890%%[/mm-hide-text]