Friday 25th July 2025
Blog Page 1810

First year, second time around

0

You’re a fresher, but you’ve already been to university. You know how higher education works, but Oxford is a law unto itself. You and your peers account for about half of the University’s student population, but the spotlight isn’t really on you. Yup, like me, you’re a first year postgraduate, embarking on a second foray into university life. Perhaps you’re desperate to put off the real world a little bit longer, maybe your three or four years as an undergraduate didn’t quite quench your thirst for the student lifestyle, or perhaps you just can’t get enough of your subject. Whatever the reason, you’ve arrived in Oxford, feeling grown-up and seasoned like the existing postgraduates, yet at the same time trepidatious and uncertain like all the fresh- faced eighteen year olds unloading their lives onto the curtilage outside colleges across the city.

To be a postgraduate fresher is to be in an odd situation. We’re students, but often only for a year; we’re freshers with degrees; we’ve already experienced three or four years of higher education elsewhere, and have come back for more. It’s an interesting position from which to sit back and compare ‘normal’ university life to university life, Oxford style.

So how does it compare? Well, at my previous university, a left-wing 1960s institution, once you’d understood the difference between lectures, seminars and tutorials you had all the tools you needed to begin your university career. Upon registration at Oxford, I am presented with a vocabulary list. Little did I know, Oxford has its own language (and it’s not Latin!). Before I begin to tackle my reading list, I’ve to get to grips with the distinction between the Bod and the Rad Cam, the deans, the provosts and the proctors, and the all important difference between a bop and a ball. While I’m worrying about whether I’m accidentally going to park my battels on the curtilage, or trip up over the pronunciation of sub-fusc, I’m simultaneously trying to commit the order of Michaelmas, Hilary and Trinity to memory. I heave a sigh of relief when a panicked Google search reassures me I don’t need to know what mods, prelims and collections are. Life as a postgraduate is beginning to look increasingly attractive. I quickly learn that, no sooner have I hung up the cap and gown from my summer graduation ceremony, I’m excepted to don another gown for the scary-sounding Matriculation, which brings with its own mystifying set of terms to be memorised (and I’m still not quite sure what I’m supposed to do with the mortarboard).

Friends from my previous university are highly amused when I inform them that the gown donning does not end there. They picture me in a Batman-style cape as I sit down to dinner every night, and gape when I tell them that instead of pulling on jeans and rolling out of bed to line up outside the gym as we did for our Finals, sub-fusc and a flower is obligatory garb for Oxford students sitting papers in the dreaded Exam Schools. My friends trot out the obligatory comparisons to Harry Potter when I describe Formal Hall. I tell them not to be so crude as to reduce thousands of years of history and tradition to a twenty-first century juvenile novel, yet find I can’t resist the comparison myself when I first catch a glimpse of my college’s wood-panelled dining-hall, long benches stretching down to High Table. No more baked beans on toast or pasta with tomato sauce from a jar rustled up in a grubby student kitchen; here, postgraduates have to adapt to meals taken in the neo-gothic hall, paintings of solemn benefactors gazing down as grace is sung in Latin. This Hogwartian institution even has its own equivalent of He Who Shall Not Be Named: the Other Place, which shall not be named in this article, because you all know exactly what I’m talking about.

As I thread my way through the city’s ancient streets, I keep hallucinating I’ve seen Sebastian toting his teddy bear or young wizards in flowing robes. It seems a complete collection of clichés associated with Oxford have been firmly imprinted on my mind. The initial experience of a postgraduate fresher at Oxford does not cease to be surreal. A last-minute flick through the postgraduate prospectus before going up, and my eye is drawn to the list of colleges and their attendant descriptions. ‘All Souls’, the prospectus reads, is special among Oxford colleges because it admits neither graduates nor undergraduates. Apparently it’s self-explanatory, for the description ends there. Who, or what, are they, these souls who make up this mysterious college? Ghosts? Monks? Some sort of secret society? And what’s this I’ve heard about a silver Marmite lid? Just another example of the uncertainties encountered when making the transition from ordinary undergraduate to Oxford student.

Initial impressions of this surreal adventure on which I am about to embark are coupled with feelings of apprehension. I am daunted about walking in the footsteps of such illustrious alumni, about treading Oxford’s hallowed hallways and meandering through the city of dreaming spires on my way to a lecture delivered by a world-renowned academic. I wonder what on earth I can write in an essay or my thesis which will possibly impress somebody who lectures at Oxford. I ask myself whether originally hailing from a state comprehensive in Essex (it’s not as bad as it sounds!) means I just won’t fit in. I may be joining the ranks of the grown- up graduate students, but I’m still a small fish in a big, erudite pond.

In the weeks leading up to my arrival, I continue to discover the University’s quirks that Oxford undergraduates may take for granted, but which for me, having had somewhere to compare my Oxford experience to, seem quaint, arcane, baffling or just plain bizarre. For example, my college is considered fairly modern by Oxford standards but is almost a century older than my alma mater (The Latin’s coming along!) I am amused to learn that Magdalen College has its own herd of deer, and marvel at the fact that some colleges are still solely inhabited by monks. I am particularly excited to learn that some colleges have their own wood-panelled wine cellars; it’s certainly one step up from the sticky collection of half-finished bottles of spirits decorating the kitchen counters of other student residences up and down the land … although I am under no illusions that Oxford students don’t also have their own fair share of vodka bottles! I can only imagine how bewildering the whole adventure must be for the international postgraduates with little previous experience of British life, let alone Oxford University life. This is eccentric English tradition at its best. Never has the phrase ‘weird and wonderful’ been more apt.

No doubt I’m extremely biased, but I can’t see there is any better place to be a postgraduate than Oxford. Being at a collegiate university means there’s a ready-made graduate community, set up and waiting to meet me before I even arrive. Welcoming and reassuring, it’s a warm contrast to the stories of postgraduate friends in London, left very much to their own devices, existing as a separate entity on the fringes of their University’s student body. I’m struck by how involved a postgraduate can become in college societies and University life. I’ve only just come up and I’ve already packed my diary with things to do, see and sign up to. Somehow, somewhere, in the midst of socialising, volunteering, society-attending, article-writing and theatre-going, I must find time to squeeze in a degree. In a heady state, almost drunk with excitement at the thought of being able to plonk myself down and listen to any lecture in any subject (because I am just that cool), I have booked, double-booked and re-booked myself, filling my timetable with society meetings, social events and lectures that are not even my own.

Perhaps the very best thing about upgrading to Oxford is the chance to be surrounded by like-minded geeks. I only wish I was studying here for three whole years, rather than just one. The DPhil beckons.

The hostess with the mostest

0

“I think I went native very quickly because I was so young, at fifteen you just want to be like everyone else”. Meeting Sayuki, the first white geisha, one imagines that this desire to be included that she experienced as the young Fiona Graham on a school exchange from Melbourne must now seem wistfully simple. Sayuki, whose name means “transparent happiness”, has since been defined by the contrasts of a western childhood and subsequent Japanese immersion. Even at fifteen, she was experiencing a pull in two directions: “I went back to Australia for nearly a year, and I think if I’d been there a little bit longer, I would have settled back, but it wasn’t quite long enough. I came back to Japan… and that kind of set the scene for the next ten years”.

Speaking in English, Sayuki retains the faint accent of her home country, but even in speaking there are hints of the “flower and willow world” in which she moves. The female geisha voice is typically high and tinny but, mixed with the antipodean, Sayuki comes across as softly-spoken and with a controlled intelligence. This is no wonder, given that Sayuki not only attended Tokyo’s prestigious Keio University as an undergraduate, but also received an MBA and PhD in Social Anthropology from Oxford. She gives me the facts, but in typical geisha fashion modestly downplays their importance: “I’m the first geisha with an MBA, which the Nikkei newspaper loves to report on”. Sayuki’s modesty seems to spring from a Western sense of the ironic, as she remarks, “I may be the first geisha who has lectured on geisha at university”.

Yet this academic background is not such an advantage, says Sayuki, if one is aware of the variety within the geisha world. “Every geisha has a different skill set. Geisha are entertainers, so you have incredible artists, or you have geisha who are very funny, or geisha who are very smart and able to debate with customers. You have every kind of geisha and that’s why banquets are so fascinating and geisha are fascinating people”. However, she doesn’t feel that a similar variety in the nationality of clients affects their initial experience of a banquet. “First timers to the geisha world see things a little bit differently from very regular customers, who might be au fait with the whole cultural side of it. The one thing about being a foreigner and a geisha is that having me at a banquet is a very different experience from having Japanese geisha and a translator. It’s been really wonderful for me to be able to let foreigners have the real banquet experience that first-time Japanese will be getting as well”. Aside from catering for the usual customers, she delivers educational banquets for visiting students and their teachers, attends ex-pat cocktail parties, and even works with other geisha at trade shows. “A geisha has to be able to entertain in any situation. You have to be flexible and be able to perform a piece at very short notice with new people, which takes some co-ordination. Going to a banquet is like going on stage”. As with any performer, there is heavy practice involved: “geisha means artist, and geisha train their whole lives long”. Sayuki’s stories of her tea-house training, having to sit cross-legged before serving from the tray in her hands, would put a silver-service waiter to shame. Moreover, Sayuki was given permission by her flute teacher in Asakusa to study separately from the other geisha under a teacher at Tokyo’s top music university – Geidai – so she could prepare for their entrance exam.

Despite the rigour still required at home, Sayuki endeavours to adapt her profession abroad. “I try to get called as a geisha to as many countries as possible, and especially want to welcome invitations for myself and my geisha sisters. The first geisha to travel overseas [Sadayakko, ex-geisha and actress in a touring theatre group, went to the 1900 Exposition Universelle] was an incredible hit. Geisha haven’t travelled as much after World War II, but I really very much enjoy being able to play a role as a cultural ambassador”. Nevertheless, her planned appearance at the Oxford Union might be a slightly nostalgic ambassadorial appearance from Sayuki, especially when a mention of the Oxford “brand” in Japan generates instant recognition and an enthusiastic response. “After spending ten years consecutively in Japan as a teenager I was in dire need of re-socialization into the Anglo-Saxon world, and Oxford was wonderful for me; it was the perfect place to go. It’s not like the geisha world, but it’s a very aesthetic beautiful world, and you can have a very beautiful lifestyle in Oxford as well”.

The prospect of geisha travel has more serious consequences for the sustainability of the profession. It signifies increased visibility, and increased communication, something which Sayuki started to fully understand the necessity of after travelling to most of the geisha districts around Japan. Of these districts, she believes, “probably around a third will have disappeared forever within the next ten to fifteen years”. Perhaps here, most of all, Sayuki’s academia can be put to use, “The crucial question for any traditional culture is to survive in the modern age. It’s because you modernise your business methods that you are able to retain the traditional content (without altering or cheapening it). The geisha heyday was in the 1920s, when they were the face of Shiseido cosmetics or the face of Asahi beer, and if a junior high school student had a picture in his wallet of a girl, it was likely to be a famous geisha. I think it’s unfortunate; post-war, the geisha world became lower profile in many ways. Geisha are appearing in commercials sometimes, and as long as it’s good for the geisha image, it’s an example of keeping up with the modern world.”

“I haven’t really done anything radical…I haven’t really done anything that no other geisha has ever done before. Other geisha have been in the media, other geisha have used social media, and had their own businesses, together with being a geisha. When I began a new project, in retail or media, it was never without the prior permission of my geisha mother and the geisha office. One precedent that I would like to set is to be involved in commercial sponsorship, and the reason for that is that I think that is one way ahead for geisha in the future. This year has seen Kabuki actors appearing in McDonalds adverts.” She warns against the government funding that has been granted to some geisha in the past, labelling it as unsustainable and offering a false security, liable to come crashing down with a change of government agenda. It is this belief in the value of personal potential, and the individual’s own right to control it, that can be seen in Sayuki’s current project to run an internship program to help aspiring geisha manage financially in the costly early years upon entering the profession, which will run through the kimono shop that Sayuki has recently opened.

Clearly for Sayuki, she remains very much an interested party in the current and future fortunes of the geisha world. This sort of personal investment has gone a long way further than just making a documentary, which was the original reason she became involved with geisha, thanks to the contact granted her by fellow alumni at Keio. Sayuki was affiliated to the Asakusa district until March this year, when she applied to have her own geisha house. This is normally allowed after four years of being a geisha, but the Asakusa Assocation decided that they would not allow a foreigner to do this. Sayuki is now working as a geisha independently. She may carry the label of “first western geisha”, and court the publicity which it brings, but the increased need for adaption which it requires is simply an extension of pure tradition. “If I have the ability to do anything to positively contribute towards retaining this beautiful culture, I would certainly like to do so”, says Sayuki, and though conceivably she might first have said this as an aspiring filmmaker, upon starting the documentary, it rings much truer now.

Oxford Internet Institute creates zombie awareness map

Researchers at the Oxford Internet Institute have used online data to construct a map of zombie awareness across the world. The hope is that it could “offer an early warning into the geographies of the impending zombie apocalypse”.

Researchers at the Oxford Internet Institute have used online data to construct a map of zombie awareness across the world. The hope is that it could “offer an early warning into the geographies of the impending zombie apocalypse”.
Using Google’s database of media and other content stored around the globe, a team led by Dr Mark Graham was able to represent graphically the number of references to zombies in different areas. Part of the institute’s popular ‘Visualisations’ series, the map is interpreted as representing the level of public awareness about zombies.
Graham commented, “The maps shows where the most content/information containing the word zombie shows up in Google Maps.”
“Broadly speaking I am interested in the geography of information. I’m also a big fan of (or terrified of) zombies. So decided to combine the two interests in order to examine the geography of references to zombies on the Internet.”
Given the popularity of films such as ‘Shaun of the Dead’, the Western world unsurprisingly shows the most interest in the living dead.
What may be more shocking, however, is the complete lack of concern displayed by very large parts of the globe. Huge areas of Russia and China show absolutely no level of zombie awareness, while the entire continent of Africa has barely ten cities prepared for the chaos that the undead would undoubtedly bring.
The good news for Oxford is that the south east of England has a level of zombie awareness that rivals that of San Francisco and Hollywood, demonstrating a very high awareness of the threat that zombies pose to human civilisation.
Elliot Friedland, a third year student at Somerville, captured the spirit, commenting, “I’m glad that we’re zombie aware but remain concerned about the threat they pose.”
Ben Harris, a second year PPEist at St John’s, was also upbeat, saying, “I’m glad the zombie issue is no longer underground. I’ve always said we should get ahead of the undead. This is after all a grave threat.”
But there were also concerns about parts of the findings. Some students were dismayed at the level of global inequality of zombie awareness.
Ruth Evans, a second year psychologist at St John’s, said, “We should be doing more to send zombie busters to poorer countries. They could raise public consciousness of the issue and help them defend people against the outbreak when it comes.”
Friedland also pointed out that with such a high level of zombie awareness, “we could face massive congestion with everybody fleeing cities at the first sign of an uprising of the living dead”.
Controversy has however arisen over the validity of inferences from the map. One site user commented, “Is this not a map of places in the world which have a lot of Internet connections? If an entire population is obsessed with zombies, but they don’t have computers they will not show. For instance there is no big red blob over Haiti.”
However, another user stated, “I would point out South Korea, which has the highest internet penetration, yet a low zombie bloom. Which suggests that article is correct, it is English speakers who worry about Z attacks.”
Additional queries have arisen over whether the map is an accurate representation of information on zombie because only the English word “zombie” has been indexed.
One user commented, “They should include a search on Jiang Shi to get the rest of the world – of course not everyone calls them zombies… They should check with the guys in the language lab.”
Ben Harris noted the potential for distraction however, arguing, “I’m concerned that we’re getting away from the real threat – ghosts. The issue needs more transparency.”

Using Google’s database of media and other content stored around the globe, a team led by Dr Mark Graham was able to represent graphically the number of references to zombies in different areas. Part of the institute’s popular ‘Visualisations’ series, the map is interpreted as representing the level of public awareness about zombies.

Graham commented, “The maps shows where the most content/information containing the word zombie shows up in Google Maps.”

“Broadly speaking I am interested in the geography of information. I’m also a big fan of (or terrified of) zombies. So decided to combine the two interests in order to examine the geography of references to zombies on the Internet.”

Given the popularity of films such as ‘Shaun of the Dead’, the Western world unsurprisingly shows the most interest in the living dead.

What may be more shocking, however, is the complete lack of concern displayed by very large parts of the globe. Huge areas of Russia and China show absolutely no level of zombie awareness, while the entire continent of Africa has barely ten cities prepared for the chaos that the undead would undoubtedly bring.

The good news for Oxford is that the south east of England has a level of zombie awareness that rivals that of San Francisco and Hollywood, demonstrating a very high awareness of the threat that zombies pose to human civilisation.

Elliot Friedland, a third year student at Somerville, captured the spirit, commenting, “I’m glad that we’re zombie aware but remain concerned about the threat they pose.”

Ben Harris, a second year PPEist at St John’s, was also upbeat, saying, “I’m glad the zombie issue is no longer underground. I’ve always said we should get ahead of the undead. This is after all a grave threat.”

But there were also concerns about parts of the findings. Some students were dismayed at the level of global inequality of zombie awareness.

Ruth Evans, a second year psychologist at St John’s, said, “We should be doing more to send zombie busters to poorer countries. They could raise public consciousness of the issue and help them defend people against the outbreak when it comes.”

Friedland also pointed out that with such a high level of zombie awareness, “we could face massive congestion with everybody fleeing cities at the first sign of an uprising of the living dead”.

Controversy has however arisen over the validity of inferences from the map. One site user commented, “Is this not a map of places in the world which have a lot of Internet connections? If an entire population is obsessed with zombies, but they don’t have computers they will not show. For instance there is no big red blob over Haiti.”

However, another user stated, “I would point out South Korea, which has the highest internet penetration, yet a low zombie bloom. Which suggests that article is correct, it is English speakers who worry about Z attacks.”

Additional queries have arisen over whether the map is an accurate representation of information on zombie because only the English word “zombie” has been indexed.

One user commented, “They should include a search on Jiang Shi to get the rest of the world – of course not everyone calls them zombies… They should check with the guys in the language lab.”

Ben Harris noted the potential for distraction however, arguing, “I’m concerned that we’re getting away from the real threat – ghosts. The issue needs more transparency.”

AQA proposes to rank pupils by school

0

 

Britain’s biggest exam board AQA has this week announced plans to change the way they award qualifications, by ranking pupils according to the schools they attended.
Under the new proposals students would be given points for their exam results as well as a score related to their school.
The ideas are contained in a research paper drawn up by Dr Neil Stringer, senior research associate at the AQA centre for education research and policy.
The paper claims that this will help universities identify students with potential who have been held back by their educational circumstances, with the assumption that good A level grades are harder to achieve at a failing comprehensive than a top private school.
The overhaul would see pupils receive one exam score based on their best three A-Level grades, and then a ranking, which awards or deducts ‘bonus points’, according to school. This could then be given to universities individually, or centrally coordinated by UCAS.
The report stresses that the aim is not to distort the achievements of students, giving far more weight to exam results than the school attended.
The proposals have nonetheless been contentious. Critics insist that they are fail to take into account other factors, and are discriminatory towards private school pupils.
The report has indeed caused a stir in many independent schools. Dr Hands, headmaster of Magdalen College School in Oxford noted, “It is extraordinary. It takes no account of home background or the amount of tutoring a pupil could have.”
Sarah Edwards, a second year Balliol PPEist, commented, “Marks aren’t just an indication of intelligence and work ethic… Say if someone from a poor school had their B grade inflated to an A. It may well be the case that at a better school, they would have gotten an A, but that doesn’t change the fact that they lacked whatever it is which would have gotten them an A. If they then start at university…they may get left behind, instead of getting the extra support they need.”
Students Ashley Cooke and Hannah Robertson saw the report as condescending, noting that “it seems a patronising measure which devalues the efforts of state school students.’”
One undergraduate said that discrepancies in educational provision are an “important issue but this is not that way to tackle it, the government need to put more money into failing state schools.”
Despite only 7% of students being privately educated, they make up over 45% of students at Oxford. Such statistics have created increasing concern that state school pupils are getting left behind when it comes to gaining places at top universities.
Those in favour of the proposals believe such measures will broaden access to higher education and are a way to help disadvantaged students.
Second year historian Ryan Kahn argued, “if the specifics could be worked out, these measures would be a good way to iron out the obvious inequalities in the educational system.”
The University press office refused to comment at this time, as the proposals are not understood to be finalised at this stage, but the Admissions department noted that use of contextual data already plays a part in the admissions process and so any new measures were unlikely to have a major impact.

Britain’s biggest exam board AQA has this week announced plans to change the way they award qualifications, by ranking pupils according to the schools they attended.

Under the new proposals students would be given points for their exam results as well as a score related to their school.

The ideas are contained in a research paper drawn up by Dr Neil Stringer, senior research associate at the AQA centre for education research and policy.

The paper claims that this will help universities identify students with potential who have been held back by their educational circumstances, with the assumption that good A level grades are harder to achieve at a failing comprehensive than a top private school.

The overhaul would see pupils receive one exam score based on their best three A-Level grades, and then a ranking, which awards or deducts ‘bonus points’, according to school. This could then be given to universities individually, or centrally coordinated by UCAS.

The report stresses that the aim is not to distort the achievements of students, giving far more weight to exam results than the school attended.

The proposals have nonetheless been contentious. Critics insist that they are fail to take into account other factors, and are discriminatory towards private school pupils.

The report has indeed caused a stir in many independent schools. Dr Hands, headmaster of Magdalen College School in Oxford noted, “It is extraordinary. It takes no account of home background or the amount of tutoring a pupil could have.”

Sarah Edwards, a second year Balliol PPEist, commented, “Marks aren’t just an indication of intelligence and work ethic… Say if someone from a poor school had their B grade inflated to an A. It may well be the case that at a better school, they would have gotten an A, but that doesn’t change the fact that they lacked whatever it is which would have gotten them an A. If they then start at university…they may get left behind, instead of getting the extra support they need.”

Students Ashley Cooke and Hannah Robertson saw the report as condescending, noting that “it seems a patronising measure which devalues the efforts of state school students.”

One undergraduate said that discrepancies in educational provision are an “important issue but this is not that way to tackle it, the government need to put more money into failing state schools.”

Despite only 7% of students being privately educated, they make up over 45% of students at Oxford. Such statistics have created increasing concern that state school pupils are getting left behind when it comes to gaining places at top universities.

Those in favour of the proposals believe such measures will broaden access to higher education and are a way to help disadvantaged students.

Second year historian Ryan Kahn argued, “if the specifics could be worked out, these measures would be a good way to iron out the obvious inequalities in the educational system.”

The University press office refused to comment at this time, as the proposals are not understood to be finalised at this stage, but the Admissions department noted that use of contextual data already plays a part in the admissions process and so any new measures were unlikely to have a major impact.

Corpus computer removed after porn found

0

The regular viewing of “inappropriate” sites on a computer in the Corpus JCR has led to its temporary removal, following numerous malware and virus attacks.

The regular viewing of “inappropriate” sites on a computer in the Corpus JCR has led to its temporary removal, following numerous malware and virus attacks.
In a complaint to the JCR about computer usage, Corpus Christi IT officer Gareth Langley wrote, “The JCR computer has been used in an inappropriate manner regularly in the recent past (I think you all know what that means).”
Despite this statement, the computer had been so seriously misused that, whilst fully protected by Sophos Antivirus software, the warnings triggered led to the PC being removed for cleaning by the college IT department.
Members of the JCR were sent an email over the vacation to inform them of the removal which was described as the “only course of action in light of the abuse”.
A second email was issued warning that if students could not use the computer in a “sensible, adult manner” there would be steps taken to protect the computer. These could include blocking sites or a password system to allow usage to be monitored. Currently, the computer requires no log-in, meaning the identity of the miscreants is unknown.
Langley added that all members of the JCR had been reminded of the OUCS usage policy, which states that users are not permitted to use university IT facilities for the “transmission, storage, downloading or display of any offensive, obscene, indecent or menacing images or material.”
Whilst some students expressed amusement at the situation, others were less impressed by the indiscretion of some users. One second year said, “I am quite thankful that I don’t use the computer often, as hearing about this has disturbed me a little. I am not bothered by the security restrictions and I see them as an unfortunate necessity to stop a practice which really should never have started.”
Another noted, “This incident might teach half of Corpus to browse responsibly…and remind the other half always to knock!”
It is unlikely that the JCR will be charged for the work done and there will be no punishment for the JCR as a whole. The email did warn that if required, disciplinary action would be carried out against individuals.
Langley said that there was “no risk” to other computers on the university network and that the PC would be returned to the JCR when the clearing was completed.

In a complaint to the JCR about computer usage, Corpus Christi IT officer Gareth Langley wrote, “The JCR computer has been used in an inappropriate manner regularly in the recent past (I think you all know what that means).”

Despite this statement, the computer had been so seriously misused that, whilst fully protected by Sophos Antivirus software, the warnings triggered led to the PC being removed for cleaning by the college IT department.

Members of the JCR were sent an email over the vacation to inform them of the removal which was described as the “only course of action in light of the abuse”.

A second email was issued warning that if students could not use the computer in a “sensible, adult manner” there would be steps taken to protect the computer. These could include blocking sites or a password system to allow usage to be monitored. Currently, the computer requires no log-in, meaning the identity of the miscreants is unknown.

Langley added that all members of the JCR had been reminded of the OUCS usage policy, which states that users are not permitted to use university IT facilities for the “transmission, storage, downloading or display of any offensive, obscene, indecent or menacing images or material.”

Whilst some students expressed amusement at the situation, others were less impressed by the indiscretion of some users. One second year said, “I am quite thankful that I don’t use the computer often, as hearing about this has disturbed me a little. I am not bothered by the security restrictions and I see them as an unfortunate necessity to stop a practice which really should never have started.”

Another noted, “This incident might teach half of Corpus to browse responsibly…and remind the other half always to knock!”

It is unlikely that the JCR will be charged for the work done and there will be no punishment for the JCR as a whole. The email did warn that if required, disciplinary action would be carried out against individuals.

Langley said that there was “no risk” to other computers on the university network and that the PC would be returned to the JCR when the clearing was completed.

Alcohol could be restricted at Hugh’s formal hall

Recent proposals by St Hugh’s to ban students from bringing their own alcohol to formal hall have caused discontent among much of the student body. 88.8% of students who replied to a survey conducted by the JCR stated that the measures would damage their experience of formal hall.

Recent proposals by St Hugh’s to ban students from bringing their own alcohol to formal hall have caused discontent among much of the student body. 88.8% of students who replied to a survey conducted by the JCR stated that the measures would damage their experience of formal hall.
The college asserted that the changes would “enhance the quality of the experience for everyone present, and address the issue created by a small number of students bringing excessive amounts of alcohol into Formal Hall and thereby creating difficulties for the serving staff.”
If the ban is enforced, hall staff will instead provide students with two glasses of wine or non-alcoholic fruit punch. To reflect this change, however, the college will have to raise the price of a formal hall ticket from £7.25 To £10.40.
Of the 170 students who replied to the JCR’s survey, the overwhelming majority were opposed to the changes. 91.4% replied that they were against the proposed measures, whilst 85% believed that the changes would not address poor behaviour effectively.
Incoming freshers are also unenthusiastic about the changes, with 80.8% of new students saying that they prefer the existing system. Overall 55.4% of those who replied to the survey went so far as to say that if the booze ban is implemented, they would not attend formal hall at all.
A third-year St Hugh’s student, speaking to Cherwell this week, said that the proposed changes to pricing are particularly unfair. He said, “The problem is that they’ve priced it at £9 for a bottle of wine, with no choice about the matter at all.”
The student also remarked that the proposed changes took him by surprise, saying, “Formal hall was sometimes rowdy before, but we never got any warning about it: if the college had made the situation clear, we might have changed our ways.”
When asked if he would stop attending formal hall in protest at the changes, the student said, “I probably will go, but not as often as before.”
Another student condemned the proposal, saying, “It has annoyed almost everyone here. Far fewer people will go to formal hall as a result.”
St Anne’s College introduced a similar change last year, banning students from bringing their own alcohol to formal hall and limiting the amount they can buy from the college.
Andrew Mawer, a fourth year medic at St Anne’s, told Cherwell  that the change did not have a particularly negative effect, saying, “I didn’t really find any problems  with it myself: I’m a bit of a lightweight, and I find that three quarters of a bottle is enough.”
He added that there was an adverse reaction when the changes were introduced, but that this soon evaporated, saying, “We talked about boycotting formal, but nothing ever actually came of it.”

 

The college asserted that the changes would “enhance the quality of the experience for everyone present, and address the issue created by a small number of students bringing excessive amounts of alcohol into Formal Hall and thereby creating difficulties for the serving staff.”

If the ban is enforced, hall staff will instead provide students with two glasses of wine or non-alcoholic fruit punch. To reflect this change, however, the college will have to raise the price of a formal hall ticket from £7.25 To £10.40.

Of the 170 students who replied to the JCR’s survey, the overwhelming majority were opposed to the changes. 91.4% replied that they were against the proposed measures, whilst 85% believed that the changes would not address poor behaviour effectively.

Incoming freshers are also unenthusiastic about the changes, with 80.8% of new students saying that they prefer the existing system. Overall 55.4% of those who replied to the survey went so far as to say that if the booze ban is implemented, they would not attend formal hall at all.

A third-year St Hugh’s student, speaking to Cherwell this week, said that the proposed changes to pricing are particularly unfair. He said, “The problem is that they’ve priced it at £9 for a bottle of wine, with no choice about the matter at all.”

The student also remarked that the proposed changes took him by surprise, saying, “Formal hall was sometimes rowdy before, but we never got any warning about it: if the college had made the situation clear, we might have changed our ways.”

When asked if he would stop attending formal hall in protest at the changes, the student said, “I probably will go, but not as often as before.”Another student condemned the proposal, saying, “It has annoyed almost everyone here. Far fewer people will go to formal hall as a result.”

St Anne’s College introduced a similar change last year, banning students from bringing their own alcohol to formal hall and limiting the amount they can buy from the college.

Andrew Mawer, a fourth year medic at St Anne’s, told Cherwell  that the change did not have a particularly negative effect, saying, “I didn’t really find any problems  with it myself: I’m a bit of a lightweight, and I find that three quarters of a bottle is enough.”

He added that there was an adverse reaction when the changes were introduced, but that this soon evaporated, saying, “We talked about boycotting formal, but nothing ever actually came of it.”

Union entice Katie Price

0

Katie Price, a.k.a. Jordan, will be speaking at the Oxford Union on Wednesday of 1st week.  The decision to invite the former glamour model and television celebrity has been received with mixed emotions from Union members and Oxford students.

Katie Price, a.k.a. Jordan, will be speaking at the Oxford Union on Wednesday of 1st week.  The decision to invite the former glamour model and television celebrity has been received with mixed emotions from Union members and Oxford students.
Price will join the ranks of distinguished individuals invited to address the Union, who in the last year alone have included Sir Michael Parkinson and Sir Ian McKellen, and have previously included the Dalai Lama, Dame Judi Dench and Baroness Thatcher.
 The Oxford Union itself defends the invitation, describing Price on the Michaelmas term card as being “everywhere”, and adding, “You can’t help but know who she is.” The society also praises her resilience, claiming she has “consistently subverted the stereotype to which the media would have her conform”.
A Union spokesperson told Cherwell that the society is particularly interested in “the journey our speaker has made from being Jordan the glamour model to becoming Katie Price the brand”.  The spokesperson pointed out that the Union “welcomes entrepreneurs and people from the world of business”, and that “in the sense that she is a brand, Katie Price is no different”.
 One Union member, however, expressed his disappointment with the booking, telling Cherwell, “I don’t understand —  in the past the Union has delivered A-grade celebrities with real credit and worth attached to them. Bringing Katie Price to talk to us is distinctly underwhelming”.
 Another member stated ironically, “I want to know how she went about writing her book”. Price has produced a series of novels and autobiographies, the first of which, Being Jordan, was nominated for Biography of the Year in 2004. The member also expressed surprise at the choice of speaker, remarking that the decision to invite the celebrity wasn’t “very Union”.
 Others plan to treat the celebrity’s address to the Union next week as a joke. A second year historian from Pembroke announced her intention to attend the speech “for a laugh”.
 The Union has in the past hosted several celebrities who have spoken on areas outside of their careers. Pamela Anderson spoke in Michaelmas 2010 about vegetarianism on behalf on PETA, the animal rights organisation.
Several Union members have speculated that Ms Price would do the same, one stating that the society had “set a precedent” in inviting Ms Anderson.
Katie Price’s past experience as a glamour model for The Sun under the name of “Jordan” has stimulated more debate. The OUSU Vice-President for Women, Yuan Yang, stated that “It will be intriguing to hear about Ms Price’s experience of the glamour modelling industry, given that the vast majority of women within it have no platform or trade union protection.”
Emily Cousens, a member of a feminist discussion group at Wadham College, denied that Price can be called a female icon. She quoted journalist Caitlin Moran,  “Women who, in a sexist world, pander to sexism to make their fortune are Vichy France with tits. Are you a 32GG, waxed to within an inch of your life and faking orgasms? Then you’re doing business with a decadent and corrupt regime. Calling that a feminist icon is like giving an arms dealer the Nobel Peace Prize.”
Nevertheless, the Union claims that Katie Price “is seen as a role model for single mothers from all walks of life”, fitting with the celebrity’s description on her website as “a strong, realistic female icon for many ordinary girls and women”.
A second year law student from Pembroke defended Price, saying, “she deserves credit for what she does. She successfully branded herself: not everyone will agree with how she makes her money but ultimately there is no denying she is a household name and a successful businesswoman, and I doubt she will stop any time soon.”
The student added, “Behind all of TV shows, makeup and hair extensions, she is still a human, and she does a great job raising her children, which people are quick to overlook”. Harriet Baker, another Union member, agreed, saying, “Regardless of how she works, she’s certainly a very astute businesswoman.”

Price will join the ranks of distinguished individuals invited to address the Union, who in the last year alone have included Sir Michael Parkinson and Sir Ian McKellen, and have previously included the Dalai Lama, Dame Judi Dench and Baroness Thatcher. 

The Oxford Union itself defends the invitation, describing Price on the Michaelmas term card as being “everywhere”, and adding, “You can’t help but know who she is.” The society also praises her resilience, claiming she has “consistently subverted the stereotype to which the media would have her conform”.

A Union spokesperson told Cherwell that the society is particularly interested in “the journey our speaker has made from being Jordan the glamour model to becoming Katie Price the brand”.  The spokesperson pointed out that the Union “welcomes entrepreneurs and people from the world of business”, and that “in the sense that she is a brand, Katie Price is no different”. 

One Union member, however, expressed his disappointment with the booking, telling Cherwell, “I don’t understand —  in the past the Union has delivered A-grade celebrities with real credit and worth attached to them. Bringing Katie Price to talk to us is distinctly underwhelming”. 

Another member stated ironically, “I want to know how she went about writing her book”. Price has produced a series of novels and autobiographies, the first of which, Being Jordan, was nominated for Biography of the Year in 2004. The member also expressed surprise at the choice of speaker, remarking that the decision to invite the celebrity wasn’t “very Union”. 

Others plan to treat the celebrity’s address to the Union next week as a joke. A second year historian from Pembroke announced her intention to attend the speech “for a laugh”. 

The Union has in the past hosted several celebrities who have spoken on areas outside of their careers. Pamela Anderson spoke in Michaelmas 2010 about vegetarianism on behalf on PETA, the animal rights organisation.

Several Union members have speculated that Ms Price would do the same, one stating that the society had “set a precedent” in inviting Ms Anderson.

Katie Price’s past experience as a glamour model for The Sun under the name of “Jordan” has stimulated more debate. The OUSU Vice-President for Women, Yuan Yang, stated that “It will be intriguing to hear about Ms Price’s experience of the glamour modelling industry, given that the vast majority of women within it have no platform or trade union protection.”

Emily Cousens, a member of a feminist discussion group at Wadham College, denied that Price can be called a female icon, commenting,  “Women who, in a sexist world, pander to sexism to make their fortune are Vichy France with tits. Are you a 32GG, waxed to within an inch of your life and faking orgasms? Then you’re doing business with a decadent and corrupt regime. Calling that a feminist icon is like giving an arms dealer the Nobel Peace Prize.”

Nevertheless, the Union claims that Katie Price “is seen as a role model for single mothers from all walks of life”, fitting with the celebrity’s description on her website as “a strong, realistic female icon for many ordinary girls and women”.

A second year law student from Pembroke defended Price, saying, “she deserves credit for what she does. She successfully branded herself: not everyone will agree with how she makes her money but ultimately there is no denying she is a household name and a successful businesswoman, and I doubt she will stop any time soon.”

The student added, “Behind all of TV shows, makeup and hair extensions, she is still a human, and she does a great job raising her children, which people are quick to overlook”.

Harriet Baker, another Union member, agreed, saying, “Regardless of how she works, she’s certainly a very astute businesswoman.”

Queen’s JCR VP and Social Sec banned from College

0

Two JCR committee members at Queen’s College are understood to have been temporarily banned from the college after they were caught climbing on buildings.

Two JCR committee members at Queen’s College are understood to have been temporarily banned from the college after they were caught climbing on buildings. The JCR Vice-President and Social Secretary were denied vacation residence in their college rooms during Freshers’ Week as punishment for being found on the roof of a building in Queen’s last week. The responsibility attached to their positions is believed to have contributed to the level of the disciplinary measures.

The JCR Vice-President and Social Secretary were denied vacation residence in their college rooms during Freshers’ Week as punishment for being found on the roof of a building in Queen’s last week.

The responsibility attached to their positions is believed to have contributed to the level of the disciplinary measures.

OUP to hold book fair in Pakistan

0

Oxford University Press is holding a book fair across Pakistan throughout October, offering discounts on a wide variety of their titles, including both local books and imported textbooks.

Oxford University Press is holding a book fair across Pakistan throughout October, offering discounts on a wide variety of their titles, including both local books and imported textbooks. During the fair, held at 13 of their bookshops, 60,000 OUP titles in English and Urdu are being offered with discounts ranging from 20% to 30%. The OUP publishes many school textbooks in Pakistan and their popular range of bilingual dictionaries are also on offer. As part of the book fair, OUP is organising a number of events and activities for children at the bookshops, with the intention of promoting literacy skills and creativity.
The book fair is also part of a larger effort by the OUP to encourage children’s literacy skills, and they have joined forces with a Pakistan-based NGO to organise a children’s literacy festival at the Children’s Library Complex in Lahore this November.

During the fair, held at 13 of their bookshops, 60,000 OUP titles in English and Urdu are being offered with discounts ranging from 20% to 30%.

The OUP publishes many school textbooks in Pakistan and their popular range of bilingual dictionaries are also on offer.

As part of the book fair, OUP is organising a number of events and activities for children at the bookshops, with the intention of promoting literacy skills and creativity.

The book fair is also part of a larger effort by the OUP to encourage children’s literacy skills, and they have joined forces with a Pakistan-based NGO to organise a children’s literacy festival at the Children’s Library Complex in Lahore this November.

Oxford releases interview questions

0

Mike Nicholson, Director of Undergraduate Admissions at Oxford explained, “The interviews are an important but often misunderstood part of Oxford’s admissions process. We want to show students as much as possible what they are really like so they aren’t put off  by what they might have heard.”

 Mike Nicholson, Director of Undergraduate Admissions at Oxford explained, “The interviews are an important but often misunderstood part of Oxford’s admissions process. We want to show students as much as possible what they are really like so they aren’t put off  by what they might have heard.”
Questions revealed included, “Why do lions have manes?” for prospective biological sciences students, or “How hot does the air have to be in a hot air balloon if I wanted to use it to lift an elephant?” for those applying to do Materials Sciences.
Despite these seemingly unanswerable questions, Nicholson insists, “The interview is an academic conversation in a subject area between tutors and candidate, similar to an undergraduate tutorial. And like tutorials, the interviews are designed to push students to think, not recite specific facts or answers.”In an attempt to demystify the admission and interview process at Oxford, the University has released sample questions that prospective students may be asked when they apply. 

Questions revealed included, “Why do lions have manes?” for prospective biological sciences students, or “How hot does the air have to be in a hot air balloon if I wanted to use it to lift an elephant?” for those applying to do Materials Sciences.

Despite these seemingly unanswerable questions, Nicholson insists, “The interview is an academic conversation in a subject area between tutors and candidate, similar to an undergraduate tutorial. And like tutorials, the interviews are designed to push students to think, not recite specific facts or answers.”