Wednesday, May 14, 2025
Blog Page 1836

Great people, shame about the sheep

0
he Welshman’s dishonest, he cheats when he can/ Little and dark, more like monkey than man/ He works underground with a lamp in his hat/ And he sings far too loud far too often and flat…
Michael Flanders there reminding us of the joys of witticised racism. He couldn’t be more wrong. Wales ain’t bad. It’s lovely. The Welsh are lovely, their culture is lovely, their language is lovely. It’s as if Stephen Fry founded a country. But there is one problem with Wales; one very curly problem. Sheep. 
Wales, as a concept, is mostly about sheep. They are everywhere. Actually everywhere. Alive on hillsides and farmyards, dead on plates and the side of the road. Big ones, small ones, violently rutting ones, rarely out of earshot and rarely out of sight. The reek of sheep’s wool spindles up the valley. To know what it smells like in rural Wales, wear a woollen jumper continuously for six months, then piss on it. Now hold it over your face till you’re knocked out. The poor Welsh do their best to counteract it. I don’t doubt they started underground mining not to get coal or make money, but to get away from the smell of wet sheep.
Except when they’re shagging them. Sheep-buggery is rampant, and I can marshall legions of evidence to prove this viz. that I want it to be true. My old maths teacher – a Welshman so Welsh he makes Huw Edwards look like he’s from Norfolk – spent a good deal of time telling our class an elaborate history of sheep-rape, sheep-jobs and sheep-sodomy in Wales in the nineteenth century. So I have an encyclopaedic knowledge of this subject. It’s very useful. It’s a great way to racially abuse the Welsh.
As does the rain. It never rains, but it pours, and it never does anything but pour. Before going to Wales make sure you’re kitted out with waterproof coat, shoes, trousers and water. I was there a week and the gangrene had already set in. Wales, therefore, in weather terms, is basically England except yet more rain, wind, hail and (especially) sleet. Outrageously, the Scots outdo Wales in rain per square metre (fourty-four gallons of rain per second on average). The Welsh hate the Scots for this reason. Well, that and the fact that the perpetual weather makes them terminally depressed.
So the countryside is ruined. What about the towns? Most of Wales is poor as shit. This is not the fault of Wales. It is the fault of England. To be precise, the bits of England that voted Tory in the eighties, and thence shut down the mines. So if, as I did, you went on holiday to Blaenau Ffestinog, you will come to understand what is meant by ‘third world poverty’ without taking the bother of  visiting the third world itself. It is buttock-clenchingly depressing. 
There is only one source of income in the town, the railway. I love the railway. It’s a steam railway, and I like the smell of steam and the cheery conductors. Woo woo! Yes. But imagine if that was everything. Imagine if nothing else existed in your town except a railway. And imagine if that railway was populated exclusively by tourists. Mostly English tourists and mostly ones bringing their own food. You would, I could say with some certainty, go mad. Helping your madness are the immense walls of slate slag. These tower about the hamlet like Mrs Doyle’s sandwiches. They block out the sun. Really. They actually do block out the sun. This is the world if, instead of opening her box a second time, Pandora took a fag break, and forgot.
“Oh scathful harm, condition of Povertie!” wrote Chaucer, and allow me to repeat it and take the credit. Given that the economy of the area is derived from sheep and sheep-brothels, it should not be surprising that there aren’t that many people, and most of them seemingly poor. There is nothing here except mountains, railways, and sheep. And the Lloyd George museum. This was a sight of wanton calamity. For here was a rare, indeed unique example, of rampant rudeness and idiocy from an otherwise helpful and welcoming bunch. 
I went into the museum. It was a big museum. Everything you could ever want of Lloyd George’s was here. His tea towels, his sock-drawer: everything. There were pictures of him as a dashing and debonair youth; there were quotes about how he read Euclid up a tree; there were paintings of him addressing the House of Commons. Best of all – best of bloody all – there was a hologram of him giving a speech about tariff reform. It looked like Lloyd George. It sounded like Lloyd George. And by golly if it didn’t appear to be him. Great! I took out my camera, about to snappy-snap.
Then catastrophe. A woman came over to me, waddling intently. “NO PHOTOGRAPHY ALLOWED,” she said, and meant it. I mean to say, dash it. We were the only people in the museum. Nobody cared. Nobody stirred. The photography wasn’t flash and neither were the exhibits. I could do no harm. But apparently, in Wales, you can allow your country to be defiled and derided in poncey student papers, all for the benefit of not taking photographs. Ghod. 
Very little else was of interest. I longed for the bright lights of the city. Aberystwyth! Aberystwyth! So good they named it unpronounceably. I don’t care. They could send me to Anglesey. Anywhere to get me out of the Lleyn Peninsula. There are beaches on the Lleyn Peninsula. And mountains. But apart from them and the Lloyd George museum there’s nothing else. Driving eastwards brings me to Caernafon Castle. This is quite exciting as castles go. Walking round the edges makes you realise just how tough and hardy Edward I must have seemed to the Welsh. No wonder they retreated to the hills and sang songs and drank mead for a hundred years till Glyndwr came along and smote the English. For a bit.
Problem with Wales is, it isn’t really Wales. As you well recall from your readings in Welsh constitutional history, the Welsh Assembly was only established in 1999, and the referendum establishing it gave an almighty 50.3% in support. Sod India. England’s most successful colony was Wales, if only cos we stopped them being Welsh and made them the Yorkshire of the west. Thank God the Welsh have been regaining their identity, what’s left of it anyway. After all, now almost the only thing Welsh about Wales is the language. And that sounds like an early Bob Dylan song crossed with a fart in a bath.
Or does sound, to the English. The Welsh, in their lovely if downtrodden way, have succeeded in converting this panoply of mouth-gargler into a beautiful poetical song-dance, crooned by the poets and loved by themselves. They ought to be proud of their nation. It may be wet, poor, sheepy, smelly and cold, but its inhabitants have tackled this with verve and gusto. It’s remarkable really. They’re so far from London it’s unreal.The Welshman’s dishonest, he cheats when he can/ Little and dark, more like monkey than man/ He works underground with a lamp in his hat/ And he sings far too loud far too often and flat…Michael Flanders there reminding us of the joys of witticised racism. He couldn’t be more wrong. Wales ain’t bad. It’s lovely. The Welsh are lovely, their culture is lovely, their language is lovely. It’s as if Stephen Fry founded a country. But there is one problem with Wales; one very curly problem. Sheep. Wales, as a concept, is mostly about sheep. They are everywhere. Actually everywhere. Alive on hillsides and farmyards, dead on plates and the side of the road. Big ones, small ones, violently rutting ones, rarely out of earshot and rarely out of sight. The reek of sheep’s wool spindles up the valley. To know what it smells like in rural Wales, wear a woollen jumper continuously for six months, then piss on it. Now hold it over your face till you’re knocked out. The poor Welsh do their best to counteract it. I don’t doubt they started underground mining not to get coal or make money, but to get away from the smell of wet sheep.

The Welshman’s dishonest, he cheats when he can/ Little and dark, more like monkey than man/ He works underground with a lamp in his hat/ And he sings far too loud far too often and flat…

Michael Flanders there reminding us of the joys of witticised racism. He couldn’t be more wrong. Wales ain’t bad. It’s lovely. The Welsh are lovely, their culture is lovely, their language is lovely. It’s as if Stephen Fry founded a country. But there is one problem with Wales; one very curly problem. Sheep. 

Wales, as a concept, is mostly about sheep. They are everywhere. Actually everywhere. Alive on hillsides and farmyards, dead on plates and the side of the road. Big ones, small ones, violently rutting ones, rarely out of earshot and rarely out of sight. The reek of sheep’s wool spindles up the valley. To know what it smells like in rural Wales, wear a woollen jumper continuously for six months, then piss on it. Now hold it over your face till you’re knocked out. The poor Welsh do their best to counteract it. I don’t doubt they started underground mining not to get coal or make money, but to get away from the smell of wet sheep.

Except when they’re shagging them. Sheep-buggery is rampant, and I can marshall legions of evidence to prove this viz. that I want it to be true. My old maths teacher – a Welshman so Welsh he makes Huw Edwards look like he’s from Norfolk – spent a good deal of time telling our class an elaborate history of sheep-rape, sheep-jobs and sheep-sodomy in Wales in the nineteenth century. So I have an encyclopaedic knowledge of this subject. It’s very useful. It’s a great way to racially abuse the Welsh.

As does the rain. It never rains, but it pours, and it never does anything but pour. Before going to Wales make sure you’re kitted out with waterproof coat, shoes, trousers and water. I was there a week and the gangrene had already set in. Wales, therefore, in weather terms, is basically England except yet more rain, wind, hail and (especially) sleet. Outrageously, the Scots outdo Wales in rain per square metre (fourty-four gallons of rain per second on average). The Welsh hate the Scots for this reason. Well, that and the fact that the perpetual weather makes them terminally depressed.

So the countryside is ruined. What about the towns? Most of Wales is poor as shit. This is not the fault of Wales. It is the fault of England. To be precise, the bits of England that voted Tory in the eighties, and thence shut down the mines. So if, as I did, you went on holiday to Blaenau Ffestinog, you will come to understand what is meant by ‘third world poverty’ without taking the bother of  visiting the third world itself. It is buttock-clenchingly depressing.

There is only one source of income in the town, the railway. I love the railway. It’s a steam railway, and I like the smell of steam and the cheery conductors. Woo woo! Yes. But imagine if that was everything. Imagine if nothing else existed in your town except a railway. And imagine if that railway was populated exclusively by tourists. Mostly English tourists and mostly ones bringing their own food. You would, I could say with some certainty, go mad. Helping your madness are the immense walls of slate slag. These tower about the hamlet like Mrs Doyle’s sandwiches. They block out the sun. Really. They actually do block out the sun. This is the world if, instead of opening her box a second time, Pandora took a fag break, and forgot.

“Oh scathful harm, condition of Povertie!” wrote Chaucer, and allow me to repeat it and take the credit. Given that the economy of the area is derived from sheep and sheep-brothels, it should not be surprising that there aren’t that many people, and most of them seemingly poor. There is nothing here except mountains, railways, and sheep. And the Lloyd George museum. This was a sight of wanton calamity. For here was a rare, indeed unique example, of rampant rudeness and idiocy from an otherwise helpful and welcoming bunch. 

I went into the museum. It was a big museum. Everything you could ever want of Lloyd George’s was here. His tea towels, his sock-drawer: everything. There were pictures of him as a dashing and debonair youth; there were quotes about how he read Euclid up a tree; there were paintings of him addressing the House of Commons. Best of all – best of bloody all – there was a hologram of him giving a speech about tariff reform. It looked like Lloyd George. It sounded like Lloyd George. And by golly if it didn’t appear to be him. Great! I took out my camera, about to snappy-snap.

Then catastrophe. A woman came over to me, waddling intently. “NO PHOTOGRAPHY ALLOWED,” she said, and meant it. I mean to say, dash it. We were the only people in the museum. Nobody cared. Nobody stirred. The photography wasn’t flash and neither were the exhibits. I could do no harm. But apparently, in Wales, you can allow your country to be defiled and derided in poncey student papers, all for the benefit of not taking photographs. Ghod. 

Very little else was of interest. I longed for the bright lights of the city. Aberystwyth! Aberystwyth! So good they named it unpronounceably. I don’t care. They could send me to Anglesey. Anywhere to get me out of the Lleyn Peninsula. There are beaches on the Lleyn Peninsula. And mountains. But apart from them and the Lloyd George museum there’s nothing else. Driving eastwards brings me to Caernafon Castle. This is quite exciting as castles go. Walking round the edges makes you realise just how tough and hardy Edward I must have seemed to the Welsh. No wonder they retreated to the hills and sang songs and drank mead for a hundred years till Glyndwr came along and smote the English. For a bit.

Problem with Wales is, it isn’t really Wales. As you well recall from your readings in Welsh constitutional history, the Welsh Assembly was only established in 1999, and the referendum establishing it gave an almighty 50.3% in support. Sod India. England’s most successful colony was Wales, if only cos we stopped them being Welsh and made them the Yorkshire of the west. Thank God the Welsh have been regaining their identity, what’s left of it anyway. After all, now almost the only thing Welsh about Wales is the language. And that sounds like an early Bob Dylan song crossed with a fart in a bath.

Or does sound, to the English. The Welsh, in their lovely if downtrodden way, have succeeded in converting this panoply of mouth-gargler into a beautiful poetical song-dance, crooned by the poets and loved by themselves. They ought to be proud of their nation. It may be wet, poor, sheepy, smelly and cold, but its inhabitants have tackled this with verve and gusto. It’s remarkable really. They’re so far from London it’s unreal.

5 Minute Tute: The Death of Bin Laden

0

What will the impact of bin Laden’s death be for al-Qaida?

Al-Qaida affiliates and other militants inspired by bin Laden will no doubt seek to mount attacks in revenge for his ‘martyrdom’. If they can, they will seek out targets in the US mainland; if not, they will be targeting US interests globally or US allies. In Pakistan and Afghanistan, there is a heightened risk of militant attacks, especially in view of the violation of Pakistani sovereignty in the operation. Bin Laden had long ceased to be an operational leader — rather a continuing icon and inspiration of anti-US defiance—as attacks on the al-Qaida leadership had removed most senior and middle managers. Instead, al-Qaida affiliates, particularly in Yemen and the Maghreb have taken up the mantle, leading to a more diffuse ‘franchise’ less able to mount attacks of the scale and complexity of September 11, 2001. Bin Laden’s surviving deputy, Ayman al-Zawahri, does not have the same charisma. Therefore, bin Laden’s demise will demoralise the al-Qaida network, at a time when its violent ideology is being seriously challenged by the largely peaceful and non-religious agenda of the ‘Arab spring’.

What are the implications for the ISAF mission in Afghanistan?

Since al-Qaida’s presence in Afghanistan is very limited and its links with the Taliban durable and extensive, bin Laden’s absence will have little effect on the operational capacity of either group. However, since destroying the al-Qaida network and the elimination of bin Laden were central leitmotifs of the US presence, the Abbottabad operation will help politically underpin the Obama administration’s ambitious military withdrawal timetable. Yet in order to secure Washington’s strategic interests, the US military will still maintain a long-term presence in Afghanistan.

So are there potential repercussions for US relations with Pakistan?

The discovery that bin Laden was using a safe house less than one kilometre from Pakistan’s military academy in Abbottabad, which is only 50 kilometres from the capital Islamabad, bolsters claims frequently made by senior US officials, that senior al-Qaida and Taliban leaders have found sanctuary in Pakistan. Suspicion in Washington that Pakistan’s military and security agencies were aware of bin Laden’s whereabouts will strain bilateral ties.

Will bin Laden’s death boost Barack Obama’s presidency?

The bin Laden operation will cause Obama’s approval numbers to surge; unlike, for example, the rise in public support for former President Bush following the capture of Saddam Hussein in 2003, Obama’s recovery is more likely to endure. Saddam’s capture bolstered Bush’s image in areas where he was already then-perceived as strong (particularly national security); bin Laden’s death bolsters Obama precisely where he is weakest (national security, leadership). Indeed, the president’s opponents in the Republican-controlled House of Representatives and potential presidential challengers immediately hailed the operation and most gave Obama a share of personal credit.

The rise of the SlutWalks

0

Four months ago a Toronto policeman was advising a group of law students on personal safety. ‘I think we’re beating around the bush here,’ he said. It was January, and ten women had turned up to Michael Sanguinetti’s health and safety workshop. ‘I’ve been told I’m not supposed to say this,’ he added, but went and said it anyway. ‘Women should avoid dressing like sluts in order not to be victimised.’

The result was that Sanguinetti’s remarks sparked an international response. On facebook and twitter, women signed up in thousands to add their voices to an increasingly angry pool of dissent. They decided to take to the streets in protest: first in Toronto, last month, then Boston, last week, with planned marches in over twenty other US states together with Argentina, Australia, the Netherlands, New Zealand and Sweden. It is called SlutWalking – and it is coming to Cardiff and London.

There are two interesting points to note on the rise of the SlutWalks. Sanguinetti is not alone in thinking that women who dress like ‘sluts’ invite sexual aggression. It is shocking that a figure of authority would use a word like ‘slut’ in the first place – a bit like a British policeman choosing the word ‘faggot’ for ‘homosexual’ or shortening ‘Pakistani’ to ‘Paki’.

But there is no doubt that Sanguinetti spoke for a growing number of people who think that women who appear to be sexually available ‘bring it on themselves’. If we start to think like that it is difficult to draw a line. Is a woman on a night out dressed like a slut if she shows just a bit of cleavage, or bare legs, or does it have to be a generous helping of both? Does a woman deserve what’s coming to her if she drinks more than 3, or 5, or 7 units of alcohol?

It sounds ridiculous to talk of a culture of blame around women. But there has been a recent backlash in the naming of the accused in rape cases, where public sympathy has shifted towards men who are falsely accused over the women who have very truthfully been assaulted. Never mind that in 2008 only 6.5% of rapes reported to the police resulted in a conviction, or that up to 95% of cases may never be reported at all.

But there is also a wider issue surrounding the SlutWalks. It is bad enough that their organisers talk in woolly terms of female ‘empowerment’ and ‘emancipation’, as if women possess a great ‘feminine’ power just waiting to be recalled. The fact is that attempts to reclaim the word ‘slut’ – in the same way as ‘nigger’ or, to some extent, ‘Paki’ – will just not work. This is because women are still unsure if it is a positive thing to be what a ‘slut’ stands for.

It is interesting that this news came in the same week that MP Nadine Dorries said teenage girls should be taught the value of abstinence. Politicians seem to live in a world where girls are either having rampant teen sex and getting pregnant or where they should be be kept off sex altogether. Being proud to be a slut won’t be enough. The problem is finding the balance.

Rejecting the nuclear option

0

When, in May 2010, Caroline Lucas was elected as MP for Brighton Pavilion, it was a watershed mark for the Green Party. Never before had her party – which had been doggedly campaigning for around 20 years – played a part in mainstream British politics. This event followed a trend which had seen green issues gradually become hugely prevalent in politics. They have now become a necessity in the manifestos of all the main national parties.

Before we got down to the gritty business of parliamentary politics, however, I asked the leader of the Green Party to trace the history of her beliefs. “I first became interested in green issues through the anti-nuclear movement,” she told me. “In the mid-80s I was very involved in CND (Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament), which is where I became politically aware of the risks associated with nuclear weapons, and by extension, nuclear power.”

She cites one book in particular as having greatly influenced her views – “the critical moment really was reading a book called ‘Seeing Green’ by Jonathon Porritt, which I read in 1986. It was a real light-bulb moment; he analysed the environmental impacts of the way we live today, but also made very strong political recommendations for how to change it. It made complete sense.”

So it would be fair to say, then, that Lucas’s awakening to environmental issues stemmed from both intellectual roots, and from more active involvement in the campaigning side of the movement. Both sides of her character, moreover, are still very much visible today. When she speaks about policy, for instance, Lucas reveals an incredible articulacy and intelligence. Yet when she is asked about her current views on nuclear power her passion and zeal are still manifest.

“The idea that we need nuclear power in this country is utterly misguided and can’t be supported by the facts,” she states firmly. “My argument about nuclear power is that it is unsafe, uneconomical, and more than anything, unnecessary… It is just one of the most expensive ways you can imagine of getting our emissions down and keeping our lights on.”

George Monbiot, author of ‘Heat: How We Can Stop the Planet Burning’ and leading columnist on The Guardian, has recently come out in favour of nuclear power. As one of the highest-profile ‘greens’ in the country, he has attacked nuclear energy for years, arguing along very similar lines to Lucas. Oddly enough, it was in the aftermath of the Fukushima crisis in Japan that Monbiot did a U-turn and decided that he was wholly in favour of nuclear energy, claiming that the anti-nuclear lobby had for years been advancing arguments which were “ungrounded in science, unsupportable when challenged, and wildly wrong”.

These types of accusations, coming from a man who has been so staunchly and publicly anti-nuclear in the past, are surely damaging to the cause? Caroline Lucas takes a more intellectual approach this time: “In a sense he [Monbiot] is presenting us with an alternative, asking us whether we want climate change or nuclear power – but that is a false question. If you don’t have nuclear power, it does not mean you are locked into fossil fuels.” Lucas believes that the key to reducing emissions is in energy efficiency and energy conservation; “it might not sound very exciting, but actually it could make a massive difference”.

This might sound reminiscent of the old green movement, which seemed more concerned with reaction than progress, but Lucas is forward-thinking, and the Green Party’s policies seem to reflect her progressive attitude. “Technology” and “investment” are words which recur constantly in her speeches. In particular, her attitude towards big business is a million miles from the latent distrust and negativity of some of the older relics of the green movement.

“The private sector has an enormously important role to play,” she argues, “when it comes to being positive in this transition to a low-carbon economy.” While she admits that often it is ‘big business’ that hinders progress and reform, she believes this opposition is misguided – “the irony is that a transition to a greener economy is likely to be good for business, good for jobs, and good for the economy more generally.”

It seems, however, that at the moment this message is falling upon deaf ears in parliament. Lucas told me that she is frustrated with a coalition that came into power promising to form the greenest government ever, and yet has until now only delivered “a catalogue of missed opportunities and negative policies”. She cites the scrapping of the Sustainable Development Commission, cuts to the feed-in tariffs for the solar power industry, and the ineffectual nature of the promised Green Investment Bank as reasons for her disappointment.

“The biggest tragedy of all is that the government at the moment seems to think that environmental action is somehow in contradiction to a positive economy, whereas we would argue that if you want a strong and stable economy, the best way to do it is precisely through investing in green technologies.”

Getting this message across is one of her main priorities in parliament at the moment. As the government deliberates over whether or not to build a new fleet of nuclear power stations, moreover, Lucas is determined to see the money put towards the development of renewable energies. It seems, however, for the time being as though the circumstances are against her.

Aside from green issues, Caroline Lucas has recently been particularly vocal in debates over parliamentary reform. The Green Party was, perhaps unsurprisingly, in favour of AV. When I conducted this interview, the referendum of 5th May was still far from a foregone conclusion. Lucas’s warning is perhaps more ominous and poignant now than it was when she voiced it a few weeks ago – “my fear is that a ‘No’ vote will be interpreted by the government as meaning that the public don’t want any kind of electoral or constitutional reform, and it will set back the case for that reform by at least a generation”.

On 5th May we may well have also set the Green Party back from achieving the parliamentary recognition that they perhaps feel they deserve. Nonetheless under the leadership of Caroline Lucas the party has come far, and there is no reason to believe it won’t continue to progress from here.

Kukui runs out of Juice

0

Kukui has announced that after  three years at the forefront of Oxford’s clubbing scene, it is closing down.

An event on their Facebook page reading “The end is nigh, Kukui is closing up shop” extinguished the final hopes of Kukui-lovers across Oxford.

The club has been a favourite with Oxford students since its launch in September 2008. The closing party on Saturday was advertised as a “closing down sale. Everything must go.”

When Cherwell asked why the club has decided to close down, Kukui representatives declined to respond. However, the declining popularity of their “Juice” student nights on Tuesdays coincided with Camera’s launch of Blues Tuesdays.

An inside source also conjectured, “after the mid-week student nights lost momentum, despite the immense popularity of weekend events such as Passport to Paradise on Saturdays, the operation was simply not economically viable given the high rent the proprietors were paying for the lease of the property.”

Lucy Crane, a diehard Teddy Hall Kukui fan, grieved its loss. She said, “What am I going to do now without the entertainment of the glowing pufferfish after I realise all the fit boys in the club have girlfriends?”
However, another student’s Facebook read “VIP in Kukui is a bit like sitting in Sudan’s airport lounge, not a surprise it’s closing.”

DJ Tony Nanton, who frequently plays at Kukui Oxford and their sister club Kukui Bournemouth, expressed his anguish over the closing of the club. He said, “we need a phoenix from these ashes. Kukui has allowed me to play the tracks that other DJs and clubs haven’t had the bottle to.

“I remember years ago when I first wanted to play Low by Lil Jon and the Eastside Boyz, and the manager told me there was no way I could do that, it would clear the floor. On Saturday night at the closing event I dropped that song and had to laugh when I saw the very same guy on the dancefloor and he looked over and gave me a humorous nod.

“That’s what Kukui did, they pushed boundaries. It’s a shame to see them closing for business.”
Varsity Events, who claim to “run all your favourite nights out in Oxford,” switched lanes to promoting Camera on

Tuesdays shortly before Kukui annnounced its closure. They officially announced they would host a “Pimms Party at Blues” at Camera Tuesdays on Tuesday 3rd May.

Advertisements for the event read, “With Juice coming to an end last term after a decade of keeping Oxford students suitably lubricated on a Tuesday night, we’re happy to announce we are now working with Camera!”

Dom Conte, company director of Varsity Events, told Cherwell, “Varsity Events have a long relationship with the management of Camera, and after Hilary decided that we could provide a better experience for our avid clubbers by moving our Tuesday to Camera.”

By the end of Hilary term, Varsity Events reportedly had only three reps actively working on Kukui promotions across the entire university.

A Varsity promoter commented, “it’s hard to push people to go to Kukui on a Tuesday when you yourself would rather go to Camera. With three Camera reps and more than 30 Exeter students at Camera last Tuesday, it’s safe to say our college love it there.”

A student from St. Hildas said, “Camera is easily my favourite club in Oxford. Coming from London, where the night life is remarkably different, I found Camera to be the closest to what I’m used to; classy appearance, sophisticated people, friendly staff and good music.”

Varsity Events have been making efforts to appeal to the same market. Their event last Saturday advertised, “Get set for the launch party for our brand new Saturday student night! To celebrate this occasion we’re bringing down a very special DJ from London! Finally – a taste of London in Oxford!”

Our inside source labelled it the “curse of No. 42 Park End street. A similar thing happened to Ocean and Collins  when they were forced to shut.” Ocean and Collins described itself as “Oxford’s sexiest nightclub” with nights given innuendo-ridden titles such as “Foreplay” and “Glamourpuss”.

It is unknown at present whether another entertainment venue will open to continue the tradition at No. 42.

Review: Pygmalion – The Magdalen Garden Show

0

Pygmalion bills itself as a ‘Romantic Comedy’. Indeed, it has many of the ingredients for one; struggling heroine, her two potential male counterparts (equally unsuitable and unattractive in their own way), the social minefield of post-Edwardian London as the backdrop… However, the ideas which drive the play are prosaic and philosophical, dictating the existence of tensions far greater than those suggested by the rather facetious premise of a romantic comedy. The energy with which Ashley Wheeler and Philippa Baines’ production approaches these tensions invigorates a script which leans towards the theoretical rather than the dramatic.

As the press preview began with Mr Doolittle (Oliver Johnson) gleefully propounding his existence near the bottom of the social ladder -’I’m undeservin’, and I mean to go on bein’ undeservin’’- it immediately appeared that elaborate characterisation is all the sugar-coating needed to engage an audience with the bitter concepts of class prejudice and female independence. Well before the performance date, this scene already enjoys a contrast between the mannerisms of Doolittle and his daughter Eliza (Ella Waldman), and the inhabitants of Higgins’ (Dylan Townley) household. Higgins and Pickering (Alex Mills) watch with a mixture of sardonic amusement and round-eyed incredulity respectively as Doolittle gesticulates his way through his speech, while a reassuringly demure Mrs Pearce (Lily Levinson) provides a foil for Eliza, who wipes her nose on her sleeve with gusto seconds after arriving onstage.

Waldman’s performance promises to be all the better for forsaking any attempt to prettify Eliza; her expressions hint at the existence of the same ‘Eliza’ throughout, perhaps most in evidence during Higgins’ phonetics lesson, in which the letters of the alphabet come out in a constipated fury, as much at odds with her metamorphosis as with the meaninglessness of the letter sounds. The venom with which she purses her lips as Doolittle departs reappears in full force when she reflects on the bitterness of her situation, or rather her lack of one, as the social veneer Higgins has grafted onto her prevents her from earning her own living, while her economic status demands it. When Mrs Higgins (Rebekah Diamond) despairingly remarks that ‘talking about our insides’ or ‘outsides’ is simply unbearable during tea, she encapsulates the chief problem in Pygmalion; can either of the two facets of the play ever be truly separated or altered to an extent where one no longer poses a detriment to the other?

Certainly, the jangling, heart-in-mouth, physically cringing portrayal of Freddie’s attachment to Eliza by Sam Plumb contributes to a reassuring sense of love’s independence of the play’s more intellectual concerns; love even permeates the post-ball clash with Higgins, though Townley achieves an appropriate level of obliviousness. However it is an undeniable presence, rather than the order of the day; in this production of Pygmalion it is no more reassuring than Pickering’s attempts to pacify Eliza –’I promise you I won’t let Higgins drag you round the room by your hair!’

It is this sensitivity to the multi-dimensionality of the characters which makes this production exciting. I arrived with misgivings about its suitability as a garden show, which precludes easy conjuring up of the distinctive London aesthetic from which it is impossible to divorce the text, but these were instantly eclipsed (if not resolved) by committed and engaging performances all-round, indicative of a truly exciting production come third week.

A PhilThe mix-up

0

Students have criticized the university administration responsible for the theology preliminary examinations caused by a mix-up with the Church history paper.

Cherwell can confirm that a theology paper entitled ‘Church History’ had already been seen by some candidates in their collections at the beginning of the term.

A University spokesman explained how the mix-up came about. “A re-sit paper was prepared [in Trinity last year] for a single candidate but the candidate withdrew so the paper wasn’t used. However it was been published online with the rest of the this year’s papers.”

Pembroke student Andris Rudzitis recounted his experience, stating “The Church history paper was almost identical to Trinity term 2011. The questions were almost verbatim to last years Trinity exam. Some people at other colleges had already seen that paper and answered three of the nine optional questions on the paper, so they had a massive advantage.”

When asked about the cause of the mix up a University spokesperson said “The person who set the exam did not realise that last year’s paper had been published online and had been seen in collections”

However, the University press office emphasized the University’s commitment to ensuring examinations were conducted fairly. “The University wants to ensure that the examination system is fair and does not disadvantage any group. Any concerns are raised with the Proctors, who are the University officers responsible for overseeing the conduct of examinations.”

To counterract potential discrepancies in results, the University discounted the paper entirely. “The Church History paper was set aside by the Proctors who authorised that the Prelims could be marked on the basis of the remaining two papers.”

“The candidates were also given the option to sit another Church History paper, but the latter option was declined by all the candidates concerned.”

A spokesman for the University said “We want to apologise for any distress caused by this mistake, but the action we took ensured that, overall, the examination was fair.”

Despite being given the resit the paper, one student complained that because the marks for the Greek exam were not calibrated to come in line with other essay-based papers, the average overall mark could be significantly boosted for single-honour Theologians. “This resulted in a high amount of distinctions for straight theologians, and thus was a disadvantage to those doing joint honours which doesn’t include Greek.”

Rudzitis referred Cherwell to examination results from previous years pointing out that the Church History paper usually has a higher average score than the other papers which may have resulted in the average score for single honour Theology students markedly lower this year.

The Edgar Wind Society

0

The Edgar Wind Society is the University’s only Art and Art History society, named after Oxford’s very first professor in the History of Art who taught here from 1955-1957. We were only formed two years ago but have been growing quite rapidly since. We aim to put on a wide range of events such as speakers, discussion panels, film screenings, exhibition tours and much more, open to all members of the University irrespective of what they study. The inevitable stress and hectic schedule that comes with Oxford life means that for many people, unfortunately, an interest in art can get left behind. We hope that by providing a range of diverse and interesting resources we will enable students to continue to enjoy and learn about art.

Notable past Speakers at the Edgar Wind have included Charles Saumerez Smith (chief executive of the Royal Academy and former director of the National Portrait Gallery) and Sam Thorne (Associate Editor of Frieze) to name but a few. We aim to invite speakers touching on all areas of visual culture. Artist Dominic Johnson, for example, gave a talk on performance art and body modification, and last term Neil Hadfield(former effects animator for Disney, Warner Brothers and the BBC) delivered a talk on the history of 20th century animation. One of our most recent speakers was Carol Jacobi, a Pre-Raphaelites expert who gave an exciting talk tailored to coincide with the Ashmolean’s exhibition. I’m afraid I wouldn’t be able to tell you who my dream speaker would be as there are so many possibilities. For some reason Amy Childs from ‘The Only Way is Essex’ seems to spring to mind almost immediately, but I really don’t think she would make for great art historical discussion.

In Hilary we released the first issue of our new publication, The Edgar Wind Journal, which looked at at the topics of materiality and temporality, and we are now working on the Trinity issue which is themed ‘Art & Obsecnity’. We hope to work more with other art organizations in Oxford, such as Modern Art Oxford with whom we hosted our first event of the year and also a film screening as part of the OUFF Film Festival. In terms of speakers we will be looking to invite figures from different spectra of the arts industries (media figures, artists and curators) to give an insight into what a career in the arts might entail.

Naturally the Society extends from the History of Art department having been set up originally by its students, and we are actively supported by the Faculty. At the same time, there is no direct link between what we do as a Society and what the University teaches. Our primary aim is to put on events that people find interesting and enjoyable, aside from what they might be studying.

People would be surprised just how many subjects Art History feeds into and we  really hope to encourage all University members to get involved with The Edgar Wind Society. To hear about events or get more involved you can sign up to our mailing list via GroupSpaces or by emailing us as [email protected]

Above all we hope to remain innovative, constantly coming up with new ideas for ways through which people’s experience of art and the history of art can be broadened. On the 2ndst of February, for example, we collaborated with the Oxford Art Movement and students from the Ruskin to put on an exhibition entitled ‘The Sublime & The Grotesque’. We’ve also recently set up The Edgar Wind Blog which features news, articles and reviews of Art events both inside and outside of Oxford.