Tuesday, April 29, 2025
Blog Page 1838

Oxford’s Best: Burger

0

The world loves the cheeseburger. I love the cheeseburger. Macdonald’s has even written an ode to the Big Mac. Finding Oxford’s best burger was a challenge I gladly took on.

The world loves the cheeseburger. I love the cheeseburger. Macdonald’s has even written an ode to the Big Mac.  Finding Oxford’s “best” burger was a challenge I gladly took on.
For those prolific penny pinchers, Peppe’s Burgers of Jericho is the way to go. A quarter pounder costs a mere £2.90, and includes two free sauces, lettuce and onion. I splurged for the cheese, an additional thirty pence. The portions are vast and sloppy, unassuming and yummy, though I wish they were assuming enough to give you napkins. Serviettes were inexplicably absent from the establishment.
If you want a cheap alternative that’ll make you look less of an outright cheapskate, Four Candles’ “beer and burger” deal is always a favourite.  The burger is a bit dry but a good size, and it comes with a drink and chips, so no reason to hate. Still, I’d say it’s best eaten when extremely hungry. Goes down easier.
Willing to spend more on your burger? The Gourmet Burger Kitchen offers an aura of class to the experience, but it’s hardly to my taste. Chips must be bought separately and they serve salads as mains—where’s their beefy integrity? The burgers are tasty, but too pricey for their diminutive and oddly demure nature. 
If your date, friend, or grandmother, believes that burgers are meant to be fun and messy in the best way, take them to Atomic Burger on Cowley Road. The service reached ungodly levels of slow and the prices of their kitschy and artery-clogging classics like the “Dead Elvis” burger are a little extravagant, but the atmosphere is fab. The walls are covered with comic books and movie paraphernalia. The burgers are imbued with personality and come with a free side. The patties are hand packed and there are five flavours of Margaritas on the menu. Win. 

For those prolific penny-pinchers, Peppe’s Burgers of Jericho is the way to go. A quarter pounder costs a mere £2.90, and includes two free sauces, lettuce and onion. I splurged for the cheese, an additional thirty pence. The portions are vast and sloppy, unassuming and yummy, though I wish they were assuming enough to give you napkins. Serviettes were inexplicably absent from the establishment.

If you want a cheap alternative that’ll make you look less of an outright cheapskate, Four Candles’ ‘beer and burger’ deal is always a favourite.  The burger is a bit dry but a good size, and it comes with a drink and chips, so no reason to hate. Still, I’d say it’s best eaten when extremely hungry. Goes down easier.

Willing to spend more on your burger? The Gourmet Burger Kitchen offers an aura of class to the experience, but it’s hardly to my taste. Chips must be bought separately and they serve salads as mains—where’s their beefy integrity? The burgers are tasty, but too pricey for their diminutive and oddly demure nature. 

If your date, friend, or grandmother, believes that burgers are meant to be fun and messy in the best way, take them to Atomic Burger on Cowley Road. The service reached ungodly levels of slow and the prices of their kitschy and artery-clogging classics like the ‘Dead Elvis’ burger are a little extravagant, but the atmosphere is fab. The walls are covered with comic books and movie paraphernalia. The burgers are imbued with personality and come with a free side. The patties are hand packed and there are five flavours of Margaritas on the menu. Win. 

The Objective Truth

0

Can science tell us what’ s objectively true? Or is it merely a clever way to cure doubt—to give us something to believe in, real or not? In this series of blog posts, we’ ll look at a provocative answer to this question given by the late 19th century American scientist, mathematician, logician, and philosopher, Charles Sanders Peirce. But before delving into this eminent thinker’s view—and in the interest of full disclosure—let me begin by telling you what your present humble blogger used to think. I used to think that science was purely objective. A failsafe machine for churning out facts and converting foggy ignorance to sober knowledge.

Scientists, I thought, were a special breed of truth-discoverers—sort of like superheroes, actually, only much, much nerdier. Removed from commonplace concerns and exempt from ordinary human foibles, their pronouncements were gospel. That was before I trained as a scientist. And skipping to the punch line now: I was naïve. Even if the scientific method, on some ideal conception of it, could justify this dreamy-eyed confidence, I’ ve come to learn that the practice of science deserves a much more cynical look.

Scientists, it turns out, are humans too. They have reputations to defend, insecurities to navigate, and careers to make. Karl Popper, the famous 20th century philosopher of science, had it wrong: scientists don’ t abandon their favored theories or years-long research programs the instant a contrary piece of data rears its ugly head. Studies that don’ t work are run again; equipment is tinkered with or replaced; research assistants are fired. Science can be a messy business. Even so, if someone wanted to mount a defense of science, her best bet might be to appeal to the much-vaunted ‘objective’ nature of its ideal form: its seeming privileged relationship to truth.

Insofar as it’s done right, our imagined apologist might say, science deserves our allegiance because it transcends subjective belief—and the fallible groping of common sense—and latches on in some systematic way to ultimate reality. If we are committed to reason, then we should be compelled by science. This is where Charles Peirce—polymath and founder of the school of thought known as pragmatism—would disagree. In an 1877 essay, The Fixation of Belief, he attempted to champion the scientific method without appealing to reason, rationality, or objective truth. Instead (and this is what pragmatism is all about), he argued that science is more like a nifty trick—a practical emollient for the irritation of doubt that happens to trump other prescriptions. Got uncertainty? Try science. Not for any theoretic, metaphysical, or transcendent reason, mind you, but on pragmatic grounds alone. It just works. Well… really? Does science ‘work’ to cure uncertainty in the way Peirce suggests? And if it does, why?

If you’ re like me, you might not be convinced that the scientific method is in fact the surest way to conquer doubt—at least for certain individuals, probably some whole groups, and maybe even the entire species. I’ ll explain what I mean later on. Second, to the extent that it is a good way, I think it’s for less ‘pragmatic’ a reason than Peirce pretends. In fact, by the end of this series of posts, I want to convince you that Peirce himself must have been committed to an ‘objective’ view of science—one which says its methods are sensitive to the real state of the world, and therefore hit upon truth more reliably than alternatives. It is this special link to objective reality—and not some accident of our animal psychologies—that compels, insofar as it does, the calm stableness of belief. 

But let’ s not get too far ahead of ourselves. In order to be fair to Peirce, we should probably start with his view, in his own terms. How does begin his argument? The answer is: at the very beginning—with a definition of our species. A human being, he tells us, is a ‘logical animal’ —a belief-bearing beast, if you will—who is defined by its ability to reason, but whose access to mind-independent reality is obscure at best. Why is that? Well, as ‘animals’ we are products of natural selection—that much is uncontroversial. But what about the ‘logical’ part—what about our reasoning minds? To be sure, at least some of our beliefs (and belief-forming systems generally) must track the actual state of world. I not, we’ d have dumped by now into evolution’ s scrap pile. (To illustrate: if you sincerely believe that jumping off this cliff won’t threaten your survival—and you’ re still a virgin, I have to point out—you can be sure that the next generation will be spared your genes). That being said, insofar as it’s ‘of more advantage to the animal to have his mind filled with pleasing and encouraging visions’ – irrespective of their truth— ‘then natural selection might occasion a fallacious tendency of thought’. 

For Peirce, then, it’ s a tricky issue to sort out the ‘objective’ relationship of our human reasoning to the world’ s reality—that is, between our beliefs and actual fact. We are probably hit or miss. So for Peirce a different question comes up, namely, How in fact do we reason? When and why do we engage in processes of rational inquiry, and under what conditions do we stop? For the answer, watch this space…

Quotations in this blog come from Peirce’ s ‘The Fixation of Belief’ in ‘Pragmatism: A Reader’, edited by Louis Menand, or, in a few cases, ‘How to Make Our Ideas Clear’ in the same volume

North-south divide remains

0

Admissions statistics for Oxford’s 2010 entry show a huge regional bias towards London and the South East.

Despite extensive spending on outreach schemes and summer schools, a total of 40% of accepted students came from schools in London and other South Eastern areas, in comparison to 1.9% from the North East, 1.6% from Scotland and just 0.9% from Northern Ireland.

However, similarly to last year, the under-representation of these three regions is a reflection of the number of applications received.

Only 1.5% of the 17,144 applications received for October 2010 came from teenagers in the North East. There is less than a 1% difference between the percentage of successful applications in the region and those in London and the South East.

A spokesperson for the university said, “Most British universities will see a very strong bias in student numbers towards local students from the area or region, and Oxford manages to attract students from around the UK and also from around the globe.”

Some undergraduates from the North East agreed that teenagers in Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland and the North East choose to apply to universities closer to home for reasons of cost and convenience, with a number of able applicants being attracted to prestigious universities such as Durham and Edinburgh.  Welsh students who go to university in Wales pay only a third of what univeristy in England costs.

However, many held the view that academically able pupils in these regions may choose not to apply to Oxbridge purposely.

Dave Fairburn, an English student from a comprehensive school near Hull, remarked that, “there appears to be a difference in culture” between secondary schools in different parts of the country.

“Not just at my school, but in many throughout the area, there was a lack of ambition. The very culture…is different to the one I’ve found at Oxford.”

Lewis Wingfield, who was educated in Newcastle, added that in his experience “there is a perception, especially among state school pupils, that because there aren’t many people from the North East at Oxford, Oxford musn’t want them or must discriminate against them.

“There’s a big inverse snobbery thing – people talk about ‘posh southern snobs’ and feel they would be talked down to and disrespected for their accent.”

However, through its access and outreach work, Oxford reaches 76% of schools which offer post-16 provision.

In addition, since 2008, the university gives applicants from disadvantaged backgrounds an increased chance of invitation to interview. Tutors now look at the average results achieved by the candidate’s school, and whether they have spent time in care or attended an access summer school. Any student with sufficient A Level predictions who meets at least three of these criteria will be interviewed.

Yet the 2010 statistics show that a difference in application progression between the state and independent sectors still exists across the UK.

342 of the 12,333 UK candidates withdrew their application at some stage during the process. 209 of these were from the state sector, whereas only 118 came from independent schools.

Even in London, an area with the second greatest proportion of acceptances, students from the two sectors describe very different perceptions of Oxbridge.

One state school student said, “Many, myself included, for a lengthy period of time considered Oxford to be full of Tarquins swanning about croquet lawns and felt they could never relate.”

However, an undergraduate from an independent school remarked, “I think that the year was split into two – those that thought Oxbridge was where they would be in a few years and those that knew they wouldn’t be, but respected their intellect.”

But despite these divisions, Oxford appears to have achieved its aim of admitting the most able students. A total of 88% of applicants sitting three A levels in June 2010 exceeded the standard offer of AAA, with 40% of these gaining three A* grades. Only 12% of those accepted achieved AAA or below.

The news comes after it was announced in January that Oxford will introduce the A* grade in many MPLS courses.

A spokesperson for the university said, “It is now clear that many students in the sciences who take A levels get the A* grade, and that it would be reasonable to ask for an A* in many science and maths courses.”

VC embraces Chinese uni

0

Oxford’s Vice-Chancellor Professor Andrew Hamilton has announced a new scheme to enhance academic co-operation with China as he attended the 100th birthday celebrations of Beijing’s Tsinghua University.

Representatives of over 120 universities were present, ranging from Chinese institutions to Oxford, Cambridge and Harvard.

Following an agreement made at the event, Oxford and Tsinghua will begin an increased program of co-operation within academic research, and an enhanced exchange of students and faculty over the next 5 years.

Students from China would be able to undertake summer research placements at Oxford, whilst similar programmes in China will also be offered to those at Oxford. Additional ‘Li and Fung Scholarships’ will support the exchange of students between China and Oxford, whilst seminars and workshops will also be co-hosted under the new scheme. The sharing of academic materials was also proposed.

As well as celebrating Tsinghua’s birthday, the “Tsinghua Consensus” was reached by the University representatives. It was decided that the Universities would attempt to strengthen co-operation and exchange, maintain a commitment to excellence, play a more important role in international issues, and “improve the development of human civilization”.

The Consensus echoes growing calls that, in a time of shifting global economic dominance, the export of top quality higher education will become increasingly important for Western economies.

Fourth year Mansfield student Melvin Chen, who was born and lived in China, was positive about the relationship. He said, “Grassroots initiatives that promote understanding, collaboration and investment between China and the developed world are critical to the future prosperity of both parties.

“I believe that the development of global leaders who intimately understand both cultures is one of the great challenges of this century. Fostering greater academic collaboration will be key in this respect.”

However, whilst Hamilton discussed the growing need for global co-operation amongst Universities, some have questioned Oxford’s increasingly warm relationship with China.

The Vice Chancellor accepted an honorary doctorate from Tsinghua and revealed how over 3,000 senior Chinese government officials have received short-term training programs in Oxford in recent years.

The University’s Advanced Leadership Development Programme trains politicians up to Vice Minister level, and is run through the Department for Continuing Education in association with the UNDP.

A spokesperson for the university confirmed that this training is partly aimed at helping Chinese leaders to meet Millennium Development Goals.

St. Catz student Pascal Jerome commented, “China’s human rights abuses are grave and many, but the risk of legitimising these transgressions through academic collaboration is surely outweighed by the opportunity of naturally fostering human rights ideals in the higher echelons of Chinese government.”

Oxford University is currently home to around 750 Chinese students, 4% of the total student body and, as stated by Hamilton, “China has become the biggest source of students following the United Kingdom and the United States”.

He stressed that enhanced globalisation for universities did not necessarily mean taking a fundamentally different approach. Whereas many Western universities have rapidly established new overseas campuses in countries such as China, Oxford has not yet announced any plans to do so.

Students caught in Syrian unrest

0

Oxford University has advised all ten students still in Syria to return to the UK, in light of growing protests against President Bashar Al-Assad’s eleven  year rule.

The recommendations come after the Foreign and Commonwealth Office advised all British Nationals to leave Syria unless having “a pressing need to remain” after the bloodiest week so far in the violent unrest which has rocked the country.

One third-year student who returned home on Friday claimed that, although he had experienced none of the protests directly, “fifteen minutes away [in Harasta] there were protesters being arrested and someone was shot by the security forces.”

The suburb of the Syrian capital, Damascus, has become a focus of the opposition protests during the past week.

“The key thing as well is that the number of people dying [in Syria] is far greater than the news reports,” the student, who wished to remain anonymous, said.
 
First year PPE student, Morgan Norris-Grey, who went to Syria with his family for 12 days at the end of March, said that he saw government-sponsored protests in Hama, Latakia and Damascus.

He explained, “I wasn’t in the vicinity of the main sites of anti-government protests at that time, but perhaps dissenters in other areas didn’t yet have the confidence to come out on the streets.
 
“The pro-government protests did however seem to be orchestrated to some degree, with school children and students provided with posters and given the day off school.”

Human rights groups have reported that the number of deaths caused by the clamp-down on anti-government protests has risen to 500.

In Syria’s south, 200 members of the ruling Baath party are also alleged to have resigned.

A spokesperson for Oxford University Press Office confirmed that all students in Syria would be home by this Thursday.

IDB scholarships launched

0

The Islamic Development Bank and Oxford University have launched a joint scholarship programme to enable students from IDB member countries to study for DPhil courses in science and technology

The scholarships will cover fees, as well as providing a maintenance grant. Five scholarships will be available every year for the next five years.

The 56 IDB countries include Saudi Arabia, Libya, and Iran. Andrew Hamilton, Oxford Vice Chancellor, termed the launch as historic, saying that it “is precisely what universities like Oxford are all about”.

In a statement, Oxford University said, “providing funding so that the very best students can come to Oxford regardless of their own financial circumstances is vital if Oxford is to attract the best students.”

Cambridge overtake Oxford

0

Cambridge has dethroned Oxford as the nation’s leading institution, says a new university league ranking released last Sunday.

According to the research conducted by the The Complete University Guide, this year Cambridge has jumped ahead of Oxford in the specific areas of research, entry standards and completion rates.

Over the past ten years, Oxford has occupied the top spot in the guide’s rankings with the exception of this year and 2007, when it was nudged out by Cambridge.

Despite Oxford’s shift, the University Guide’s top five institutions remain the same group: Imperial College London continues to rank third, whilst London School of Economics and Durham have swapped positions as fourth and fifth.

Mast we deface the High Street?

0

Recent plans for the construction of a 15 metre high telephone mast on Oxford High Street have been met with outrage from local businesses and colleges.

A commissioned workforce began excavations at the traffic island outside All Souls college, in a preliminary investigation as to whether or not the underground services would be suitable for a radio base station.

Elizabeth Crawford, domestic bursar at University College, said, “None of the neighbouring Colleges on the High Street were informed of the trial hole that was excavated last week on behalf of a mobile telephone company.”  

She added, “The planning regulations do not require that local people are notified for such exploratory work.”

There has been a joint effort of late between traders and colleges to clean up and restore the High Street, and many believe that the mast, which will improve 3G coverage for Vodafone and O2 customers, is in direct opposition to such renovations.

Jeremy Mogford, owner of the Old Bank Hotel and Quod restaurant, said, “The idea of a mast there is simply appalling.”

Crawford echoed this, stating, “I cannot imagine that any business or College in the High Street would regard such an installation with anything other than astonished horror.”
As yet, the plans are still in the pipeline for the mast and an official application has not yet been made to the council.

Ilana Clark, a spokesperson for Vodafone UK Ltd., said, “This site is still in the early stages and a proposed design has not yet been finalised. We have identified that we need to improve the 3G coverage to our customers in central Oxford.”

After being notified of the project by Univ’s domestic bursar, Keith Mitchell, leader of Oxfordshire County Council, said, “My personal view is that sounds like a monstrous carbuncle on the High.”
Crawford told Cherwell, “Were a  planning application to be submitted, Univ College would certainly exercise its rights to comment on it… I hope that the students who live in Univ, many of whom look over the High Street would also exercise their right to comment on any such application.”

She added, “Were permission to be granted, I think it highly likely that the College would appeal against such a decision.”

Vodafone have also had two applications rejected for similar stations in Bath, as well as withdrawing a January application for a mast in front of the War Memorial in St. Giles, which was branded as “sacrilege”.

Oxford triumph in pentathlon

0

Oxford men’s modern pentathlon team secured their 14th successive Modern Pentathlon Varsity victory in Cambridge during the vacation.

Despite banners produced by the Cambridge crowd claiming that Oxford’s incredible winning sequence would be ended, the dark blues claimed the win by 29,652 points to 28,616.

It was doubly satisfying for Oxford as they also won the women’s event, ending Cambridge’s winning streak.

Women’s Captain Alice Self said, “having lost my previous four matches I was desperate for a win before leaving Oxford.”

Modern Pentathlon consists of swimming, running, fencing, horse riding and shooting – supposedly the test of the ultimate warrior.

Each competitor competes in every event, with their combined scores contributing to the team total.

Clare Kane top scored for the women’s team, and Harry Tabor was Oxford’s best performer in the men’s event.

5 Minute Tute: The Media and the Royal Wedding

0

Has the press treated Kate Middleton differently from Lady Diana Spencer?

 

You bet. For reasons that have never been entirely clear, Prince Charles’s various relationships with women received inordinate press attention throughout his 20s and into his 30s. When it became clear in 1980 that Diana was “the one”, the popular newspapers went into overdrive. A so-called rat-pack of staff reporters and photographers emerged, augmented by a host of freelance hangers-on. They harried and harassed Diana on a daily basis for months. Barely a day passed without a picture of her being published alongside speculative stories, often based on quotes from anonymous “friends”. By contrast, Kate Middleton has received much less coverage and been subjected to very little harassment.

 

Why should Kate have had such an easy ride?

 

In the wake of Diana’s death, itself attributed in part to the pressure of press interest, both the press and the Palace took stock. National newspaper editors amended their code of practice in order to prohibit undue harassment, and the machinery of self-regulation, the Press Complaints Commission (PCC), opened up a dialogue with the Palace. An unwritten concordat enabled Charles and Diana’s sons, William and Harry, to enjoy their schooldays in relative peace. In William’s case, that “deal” also protected him from press scrutiny during his time at university, when he met Kate. So she also benefited from the papers’ enforced reticence.

 

So what happened to the rat-pack?

 

After Diana’s death in 1997, the papers were consumed with interest in the relationship between Charles and the woman he admitted had long been his mistress, Camilla Parker-Bowles. Would they marry or not? The squad of royal reporters therefore remained in place to follow that story. But Camilla was neither as glamorous as Diana, nor was she a fashion icon, so the photographic pursuit died down. As the years passed, with Charles’s aides carefully re-building his reputation in order to allow him to marry without undue controversy, and Camilla offering no hostages to fortune, newspaper interest dwindled. By 2005, when they married, the rat-pack had already disintegrated.

 

Surely there were, and are, eager paparazzi around to obtain candid pictures of Kate?

 

The hordes of freelance photographers who followed Diana around in the 1990s, and lived off the handsome proceeds, have largely disappeared. There is no market in British publications for their work. With one or two exceptions, editors have obeyed their own code by refusing to publish pictures obtained by harassment or due to intrusion. Editors are now expected to make themselves aware of the provenance of the pictures that arrive in their offices. On the rare occasions when they have overlooked that obligation by publishing, the Palace has contacted the PCC on Kate’s behalf and there have been swift, and usually public, apologies. 

 

Does this mean that William and Kate will enjoy a marriage free from all press intrusion?

 

Yes, if they maintain the same level of distance from newspapers in future as they have done thus far. One key reason for the huge coverage of Charles and Diana’s marriage was the off-the-record briefings of journalists by their aides and friends and, in Diana’s case, directly by her. It appears very unlikely that William and Kate will fall into that trap. However, there could be a problem in an heir to the throne vanishing from newspapers because monarchy depends to an extent on visibility. Then again, will there be newspapers by the time he becomes king? Sounds like the subject for a future Cherwell Tute…