Monday, May 12, 2025
Blog Page 1858

You’ve got to be tool to be kind

Dr. Sandra Scott’s CV reads like my Sky Plus planner. She’s been on almost everything: Big Brother (celebrity and plebeian), Hell’s Kitchen, I’m a Celebrity, Get Me Out of Here and, of course, Tool Academy. She is reason when all descends into madness, as an on screen Psychiatrist she’s there to ensure the contestants are kept mentally stable and offers psychological support. You would think, with all that under her belt, she’d be an avid reality TV watcher. But no, ‘

Watching reality shows is usually work – I associate it with working’. A pretty poor excuse, in my opinion, and, almost as an afterthought, she claims she watches The Apprentice. A top quality production without doubt, but if it doesn’t have racial slurs, on-screen masturbation or kangaroo testicles it’s just not my kind of ‘reality’. As she has such intimate knowledge of the ins and outs of the production of reality television, I ask if she’d ever go on as a contestant: ‘I think I’d like to see how I’d cope. With all this experience you think you should know exactly how to play the game and how to come across well.’ It’s quite clear, to anyone with any concern for his or her pride and dignity, that reality television is the worst thing to do ever. No matter how great the prize, how hungry you are for fame, you will end up knickers-out on page four of OK!. With her insight into the workings of reality TV shows, you would think her aversion would become more acute; would she actually subject herself to one? ‘No, no I wouldn’t’. Sensible woman.

Her career progression has been a series of serendipitous events. Educated at the University of the West Indies, she was drawn to psychiatry simply because she thought it would be less physically demanding than other fields of medicine; evidently the right move, and a decision process dear to my own heart. The start of her television career was slightly more dramatic. In a casual meeting with David Wolstencroft, the writer of Psychos, she managed to get pretty ‘huff cuff’ (an excellent term I will definitely be incorporating into my vocabulary). ‘I was talking to him, and mid-sentence, out of the corner of my eye, I saw a person collapse. I went over and sorted them out, and then came straight back. I just sort of went into auto-pilot because I was quite drunk.’ Dr. Sandra Scott is evidently a woman who can work under pressure. Wolstencroft was equally impressed and his production company Kudos hired her to work on Psychos, an ‘uncompromising portrait’ of a psychiatric hospital in Glasgow. One of the characters was not very loosely based on Dr. Scott and she was consulted to provide realistic details and themes. Eventually they offered her a place on screen and the rest, as they say, is history.

Dr. Scott is a psychiatrist first and foremost. She works for and is a trustee of children’s charity ChildHope and her professional work has primarily been with children and teenagers. The context in which she works on television is rarely sensitive or serious, and I ask if her role on screen differs from the one she plays elsewhere. ‘On television, I’m not doing psychiatry. They’re not patients. I’m not monitoring their mental states in the same sort of way. I’m doing psychology.’ She is careful to make this distinction. There is some suggestion that the psychological help provided on reality television is little more than pseudo-science, for want of a better term. Dr. Scott is obviously aware of this suggestion and was wary about even being interviewed, a wariness born out of her extensive experience of journalists and journalism – ‘the press is quite hostile, you quickly learn savviness, through necessity.’ However, she seems to embody the counter-argument. Rarely in the interview does she deviate from talking about the seriousness, both of her work and of her approach to it. She claims to care about the people who subject themselves to the public humiliation that we call reality TV. ‘You are dealing with people’s emotions, and they are real people. And they have issues. It is just not useful as the professional there to help them to be poking fun and being unpleasant.’

She also claims to have lovely things to say about each and every contestant on Tool Academy. That can’t be true. We must be talking about two completely different sets of people, has she not been watching the program? I mean, come on, it’s a group of twelve men, who all considered themselves fit for a program searching for the ‘ultimate lad’. Anyone who self-identifies as such must either be delusional (I don’t think some of the contestants would have lasted long had that actually been the title) or slightly repellent. Her personal favourite is Harry. ‘I will always have a special place for Harry, he made me cry. I don’t think I’ve done that before.’ My personal favourite is Harry too, but for slightly different reasons. Hers are more professional, she feels he made real progress, ‘because he found it so particularly difficult to express himself emotionally, and then he did it so beautifully.’ Apparently it was ‘exceptionally moving’. I suppose you need to be less of a cynic and more romantic to be in this line of work.

I can see the appeal in working on reality TV. Not only do you get to see the hilarity first hand, you also get to work with the dishy men that present the shows. Just being in the same building as Dermot O’Leary would make me cry out with desire. Dr. Scott has even been in the same bed as Rick Edwards; what wouldn’t I do to trade places with her?! Unfortunately I am unable to uncover much dirt. ‘He’s very professional. He’s a good person to work with because he brings the humour so I don’t have to get involved with that.’ This works well with Dr. Scott’s sense of integrity. Working in a position of support, she’s careful to provide a sincere alternative to the wise-cracking presenters. ‘People trust me, and I would never want to betray that trust for some cheap gag.’

What about her relationship advice? ‘Communication, equality and respect’ are crucial to a stable and happy relationship. She takes care to stress that ‘equality’ is not about being the same. ‘You’ve both got to be contributing. Once you get out of the romantic phase, people end up feeling used or a burden. A degree of equality is important.’ It is interesting that equality features so much in her relationship ethos. After all, Tool Academy is styled on the idea that the man is to blame. The bloke is supposed to be in need of reform, when in reality the women on the programme are no less reprehensible. ‘It’s a reality show, it’s entertaining, the focus is the blokes. But within that, it always takes two to tango’. Dr. Scott does not take her role lightly, and she seems to be a model of sincerity in a very unreal reality world.

 

 

Lady of Le Manoir

0

“Le Manoir aux Quat’Saisons is the fulfilment of a personal vision, a dream that one day I would create a hotel and restaurant in harmony, where my guests would find perfection in food, comfort, service and welcome.”
Raymond Blanc O.B.E

Intelligent. Daring. Adventurous. All have been used to describe the cuisine at Le Manoir – and in my opinion, quite rightly so. The modern French menu has been described as “a twist of imaginative genius” and features Confit de Cabillaud, Suprême de Canard and Soufflé à la pistache. If the sound of these doesn’t tantalise your taste buds, I don’t know what will!

There are few people who have never heard of Raymond Blanc OBE – the world-renowned owner (Chairman and Chef Patron) of Le Manoir aux Quat’Saisons and one of the country’s most respected chefs. RB (as he is known by his staff) created Le Manoir to fulfil “a personal vision” and has been delighting his guests there since 1984. Awarded two Michelin stars a year after opening, these have now been retained for an incredible 27 years (the only hotel ever to have done so).

It was with great anticipation that I left the dreaming spires of Oxford behind me and set off for Le Manoir. Despite the grey, gloomy English weather, nothing could dampen my spirits as I drove (somewhat bleary-eyed) down country lanes towards my destination, listening to Radio One’s very own ‘Moylesy’ (naturally). Nestled in the picturesque village of Great Milton, there isn’t a more perfect setting for one of Britain’s finest gastronomic experiences. Idyllically situated in 30 acres of land and surrounded by immaculate, manicured lawns there’s an orchard, lake and a two-acre vegetable and herb garden.

“Would you like your car valet parked, Madam?”, a smart gentleman in a waistcoat asked me on my arrival. “Hmm, probably not a good idea”, I thought to myself. Compared to the Mercs, Bents and Jags he was clearly used to driving, my car (VW Golf, Racing Green, Reg.’02) would have been a bit of a let down. Needless to say, I declined his kind offer. Being early, for once, I was presented with tea and biscuits (scrumptious!) in the drawing room. Roaring fire. Heavenly sofas. Pure luxury. I could have stayed there all day reading about English Country Homes & Gardens, fantasising that I was Lady of the Manor. However, reality came with a jolt when I was collected ten minutes later and ushered towards the kitchens… my day at Le Manoir had begun!
Kitted out from head-to-toe in chef’s cap, whites and ‘safety shoes’ (clodhoppers), I certainly looked the part. But did I feel it? Questionable. Recent experience working in a ‘Fawlty Towers’ hotel had given me some inkling of what to expect in a commercial kitchen, but now I was well out of my comfort zone. A tour of the kitchens followed with Executive Head Chef, Gary Jones. Then, I was put to work sorting salad leaves with Chef Chris. This proved to be slow work (for me). A tiny dot, mark or tear (or lack thereof) would determine the leaf’s fate: compost or plate. So there I was, contemplating what exactly constituted the “perfect” leaf, whilst Chris whizzed through his pile like Jenson Button on the Bugatti Circuit.

Next, the canapé section with Chef Warren. Polishing 40 slates with sunflower oil was my second task of the day. Pointless? That’s what I thought at first. However, the resulting shiny-black-sheen persuaded me otherwise. Thus, the perfect backdrop had been created for the culinary show that was to ensue. Savoury profiteroles – light, yet crispy – had been piped full with chicken liver parfait-mousse and mango pureé. Little drops of heaven. Incredible! You’d have to try one to believe it, but these were something else. Next came quenelles of goat’s cheese. Perfectly shaped ovals complete with a stripe of honey, and toasted oats and fine black truffle powder atop. These rested on a delicate piece of toasted bread barely a millimetre thick. Another three canapés completed the masterpiece and we were nearly ready for service. At 11.45am, dishes were placed on the front kitchen counter for the head chef to taste and approve. Advice and criticism were duly offered. Despite the change of gear following first orders fifteen minutes later, operations remained smooth. Too used to watching a certain ‘celeb’ chef on the TV, I was expecting profanities to be uttered left, right and centre. But, no. For the next three hours the show continued in an orderly fashion.

I was next made responsible for arranging the previously sorted salad leaves on plates. Easy? Not quite. There is a certain technique to doing this, which I’d like to think I mastered by the end. Speed was also required -very testing for the perfectionist! Lunch service sped by and soon it was time to wipe down the surfaces and have a break. Here, I was able to talk to Kate, one of the only female chefs in this testosterone-fuelled kitchen team. Having studied Food Science at Dublin, she had gone on to work at the city’s Michelin-starred Chapter One before coming to Le Manoir. I was bowled over by her dedication; despite only having an hour off each day (with shifts from 8am til 11.30pm) she used most of her break to write her kitchen section’s shopping list.
Back from the break, my final task was making popcorn, a bar snack. Even this had a fancy twist to it and was tossed in vanilla salt. However, before it was deemed ready, I had to sift through the whole lot, removing any remaining un-popped kernels. Apparently, this had become a routine activity following an incident where a guest had chipped her tooth. This was a costly mistake for Le Manoir, which they clearly did not wish to repeat.

The Guide Michelin describes a two-star restaurant as “table excellente, mérite un detour”. If your GCSE French doesn’t stretch this far (mine did not, so thanks freetranslation.com): “excellent cooking, worth a detour”. I can safely (and humbly) say that from what I saw, no one would, or could, walk away disappointed having eaten here. However, on a student budget this kind of luxury may have to be put on hold for now. Thankfully, Brasserie Blanc in Jericho (Walton Street) offers simple, high quality nosh at affordable prices. I would recommend going for the ‘Roast Sirloin Sundays’- £14.50 inc. a large glass of wine- delicious and a welcome change from eating in Hall.

Driving back to Oxford following my day at Le Manoir aux Quat’Saisons I realised how much I had learnt and how little I actually knew about cooking. The techniques used in professional kitchens of this calibre are so high-tech and the pace of activity so quick that even I, a reasonable home cook found it hard to follow. Sadly, Monsieur Raymond Blanc OBE, the great man himself, was not around when I visited. Perhaps I will have to accept the invitation to return and make sure I go when he is!

 

How about you, Ben Dover?

0

You probably haven’t heard of Lindsay Honey, but you might have seen him, or some of his work.  He’s an extremely successful director of more than 150 movies, directs and stars in his own video series, and has won a multitude of awards. Of course, that’s more than 150 adult movies, his own video series of ‘gonzo’ porn under the name Ben Dover, and awards including Best Speciality Video for Duke of Knockers 2, and Best Foreign Film in the Hot D’Or, the adult section of the Cannes Film Festival.  He pioneered the only Scratch ‘n’ Sniff movie, Smells Like Sex, and has his own line of adult toys, the Ben Dover Signature line. He’s a fiend at creating groan-worthy porn titles (Sex and the Settee, anyone? How about The Porn Supremacy?), and as Ben Dover, Honey has slept with over 1,790 women. (Incidentally, he’s also the father of Tyger Drew-Honey, who plays the eldest son in Outnumbered). For pornography is Honey’s craft, and he’s one of the best in the business.

Under his directing name, Steve Perry, Hustler crowned Honey one of the top 50 most influential people in the adult entertainment industry in 1999, but Honey’s all too aware the industry has changed a great deal since then. ‘The internet is the main poison that’s now rapidly killing off the industry. Back in 1986 you could sell a 3-hour VHS porn tape for about £65.00, which would be about £150.00 in today’s money. Now you can get anything you want at the click of a mouse. For free. One of the other major things that has changed over the years is that all the girls in the industry now are shaved. Back when I started the girls always had hair at the downstairs buffet, and if I was doing a shoot for Shaven Ravers I’d have to pay the girls extra to shave because it was thought of as a bit weird. Now it’s completely the other way round. Having hairy lady bits is considered weird! Also, in the days of yore, you very rarely saw a model with tattoos. Now, you very rarely find a model who hasn’t got several. Strangely, girls think the tattoos makes them more sexy, when the reality is actually most men find them a complete turn off.’

‘Right now the only real money to be made is in the so-called ‘celebrity’ sex tapes. Even if they’re not  celebrities, just some girl who’s been ‘on the telly’.  It’s strange but you could make a great movie with the best looking porn stars in the world, and you’ll probably make a very small profit over several years,  but if you’ve got 10 minutes of grainy footage shot on a mobile phone of some no mark ‘Z’ lister whose sole claim to ‘fame’ is that she was on Big Brother and had a picture taken with a footballer at a premiere of a rubbish BritFlick starring Danny Dyer, you’ll make money. Quite a lot in fact. At this moment in history, if any footage of, say, Cheryl Cole, emerged of her enjoying a bit of ‘Ladies & Gentlemen’ action, you’d make enough to retire. Yes really.’

With admirable stamina and desperate fans needing their fill, Honey hasn’t let this shift towards internet pornography end his career.  Earlier this year he was inducted into the adult entertainment industry Hall of Fame, and has picked up 4 lifetime achievement awards for his efforts.  But having got the fame and the riches while the video porn industry could still offer it, Honey has moved on to a new, and frankly, much more fun sounding project.  His greatest success? ‘Doing my one man show Ben Dover — Innocent ‘til Proven Filthy at the Edinburgh festival for 27 nights straight. I never thought I’d have the confidence to do it but I did, and it was a success.’  Impressively, Honey has managed to turn his bumbling porn persona into an expanding business.  On his website not only can you buy caps, mugs, t-shirts, underwear, even window stikers, emblazoned with his moniker, but you can book a Ben Dover stag or hen weekend (God only knows what that would involve). Shrewd Honey hasn’t missed a trick in catering for the clubbing generation either, his events include the tempting-titled ‘Ben Dover Porn Disco’, where us lucky ladies receive a free pair of hot pants.  There’s even a competition to be extra in one of his next films; anyone of us could be the next star of Ben in Black 3 or Top Rear!

 And of course Honey is still making and directing films using his distinctive ‘gonzo’ style of filming. Honey lets us in on a few of his keys to good porn directing. ‘Getting the right angles in porn is very important, you need to see the action clearly. I never hold a shot for longer than 15 seconds. Don’t fall in to the trap of holding a shot for ages just because it’s a good shot. I usually stick to the following sequence of shots; wide, close up of action, pan to girl’s face, back to wide, and repeat. My golden rule? Never show the guy’s face when waiting for the Money Shot! No-one wants to be enjoying that bit of the movie only to find themselves looking at a big  close up of some mulleted German bloke gurning away whilst muttering “Ooh ya, das is gut baby” at that critical moment!’ So what’s more important, good acting or a good narrative? ‘Neither. Good looking, sexy girls being filthy is all that matters.’

I think Honey possesses the self-assurance verging on arrogance that would make a lot of people hate him if he wasn’t so damn charismatic. Just don’t expect him to be apologetic about his achievements. ‘My critics do affect me badly.  Sometimes so badly that I have to leave my 6 bedroom mansion in a gated executive park in Surrey, get in my Ferrari and drive to the airport to fly out to my luxury villa in Spain and take a long leisurely swim in my beautiful blue sparkling pool overlooking the Jalon valley!’ 

A career in porn only followed after a fleetingly successful job as a drummer in The Ian Mitchell Band — Honey’s original passion being music.  So how does our rock star to cock star feel about his career choice and the industry that’s made him famous?  ‘The porn industry’s been very good to me, of course, but I don’t really like the way it has become so corporate nowadays. It was much more exciting when there was just a few of us, taking risks and trying to stay one step ahead of the law!’ Honey takes on a warning tone, ‘Don’t pursue a career in it unless you have independent wealth and want to do it for a bit of fun. There are no Ferraris to be had in this business any more. Well, that is unless you get lucky with Cheryl Cole, and you happen to have your mobile phone in video mode!’

 

www.ben-dover.org

 

The absolute eBane of my life

C**t has outbid you! Would you like to bid again?

Yes, I bloody would. I really want this White Leather Sexy Must-Have Rhinestone 70s Catsuit. Actually no, I really need it. I can already feel it, this is going to become one of my most-worn, most-loved, staple closet items. It is going to be the flagship piece, the jewel in the crown, of my new capsule wardrobe. In fact, I think I’ll wear it to Park End this Wednesday, and then to my Old English tutorial the day after, and then to go as Gary Glitter to the Bad Taste bop, or, failing all that, I’ll just wear it in bed. In fact, maybe I won’t even wear it in bed. Maybe I’ll just hang it up on my wall and stroke it. I don’t care what the Fire Warden might say; if it’s a fire hazard, it’s my fire hazard. I’m going to tell everyone who sees it the story of how, in the last nail biting seconds, C**t bit the dust and I triumphed as The Highest Bidder. She came, she saw, and she took that bitch doooooown.

C**t has placed a bid of £178. Would you like to bid again?

My fingers stroke the keyboard. 48 seconds left. The red ticking time bomb in the centre of the screen makes me start to panic. I mean, when you actually think about it, numbers are just, like, squiggles, aren’t they? Like, what do they actually mean? At that moment, I have a brief out of body experience. I look down at myself. It’s 4.08am, and the milkman is delivering. I’m hunched over my laptop in Mr Men pyjamas, my leg is jigging up and down like a need a wee (I do, I’ve been glued to this auction for the last 53 minutes), and I’m talking to myself about Gary Glitter. Can you really do this to yourself, Rebecca? What would your mother say? What would the domestic bursar say? What would NatWest say? I sigh, click ‘cross’, and buy a consolatory pair of pineapple shaped earrings for 99p. Welcome to eBay.

The phenomenon of eBay is changing the way we shop. Since its start in 1995, there is no longer any need to leave the house. Who needs daylight anyway, when you can just as easily buy a 2001 Mega Sun Used Sunbed from cosmo2tan in India? EBay is a nowhere world, that is, paradoxically, fast-paced and frenzied, but also lonely and silent. It is an auction room of a billion, and just one. Bidding on eBay is like fighting in a retail war-zone, where you never see the faces of the people you shoot down. This cyberspace of cut-throat haggling and anonymous bitchiness is a place where speechless negotiation, soundless transaction and the electronic shaking of hands occur across the world by the second.

I find it highly distressing that I cannot see the person who has just outbid me. I’d appreciate a personal profile: you know, Favourite Colour, Favourite Food, Reason Why I’m Such a Dick etc. EBay cunningly obscures bidders’ usernames with the asterisk, presumably so you can’t hunt them down and kill them, not that the thought had ever crossed my mind. EBay does, however, permit you to take a look at their recent Bid History. This provides endless hours of fun, as the further you delve into someone’s bid history, the sharper the psychological portrait that materialises in the minds-eye. Take, for instance, bidder f******r, who has just, at the very last possible second, outbid me on a 1980s Oversized Lady’s Missoni Cardigan. A few clicks reveal their life and being. This is what I find:

Crafts > Glass Art & Mosaic Supplies

Home & Garden > Major Appliances

Collectibles > Collector Plates

Dolls & Bears > By Brand, Company, Character

I make up my mind that bidder f*****r doesn’t get out much. She (or he?) probably isn’t even going to wear my Missoni cardigan. She’ll probably use it to polish the collectible Lady Di memorial plates I decide she hangs in the downstairs toilet. That is, when she isn’t making hideous things out of Hobbycraft-style mosaics and then passing them off as Christmas presents, or operating heavy machinery in the Home and Garden. A real personal vendetta can develop. I contemplate trawling though each of her 31 bids, and outbidding her at the last second every time, just to really piss her off. I see she’s been looking at Kitchenware too. Now, hang on, that’s what I reeeally need, a spice rack, or, oooh, a hostess trolley, yeah? Then I forget about it all and move on to something else.

A closer look at the Seller can also divulge an alarming sense of character. I have decided to buy a Vintage Ralph Lauren Navajo Jacket from borntoride22 for a price that I cannot afford. Paypal and I both know that this isn’t in my account, but borntoride22 doesn’t, yet. Just before hitting ‘Buy It Now’ in a moment of fuckitall recklessness, I pause, my mouse drifts, and I click See Seller’s Other Items, just out of curiosity. I see they are also selling a set of steak knives, a ‘designer’ 3 pack of Primark trainer socks, a novelty pvc apron, an M&S cardigan, and a Clearasil face wash, marked ‘used’. In the Details section, there is written simply, ‘no haters please.’ My confidence falters.
Money ceases to be money on eBay. Student loan? What student loan, this is eBay, the UK’s biggest online marketplace, the land of flowing milk and honey, the Promised Land. No notes, no coins, just clicks, simple, harmless clicks. The dizzying expansion of British eBay to an international scale only compounds the problem. Everything is dealt with in dollars. What even is a $? A dollar to me will only ever be the symbol on the end of Snoop Dogg’s chain. I find myself staring blankly at the screen, coming to the mental conclusion that, basically, you just, like, take whatever number it is in dollars and divide it by, like, half yeah? No. Suddenly everything becomes doubly unreal; different currencies float around my brain and electronic money flits through cyber space like bats out of hell. A further critical sign of an unhealthy relationship with eBay is when you start to treat it like a person. It is taunting me. It is deliberately making me feel stupid. No, it is not. It is not a human, it is not real. But the infuriating messages it sends often seem to suggest otherwise. Having been thankfully outbid on a penis shaped tin opener (a drunken eBay rape, the new Facebook rape, don’t you know), I received the patronising, consolatory message “Don’t worry, this one got away but there’s plenty more fish in the sea!”. It is as if eBay is trying to give me a cheer-up-sonny pat on the head after an embarrassing dating failure. My hung-over self did not appreciate. Equally, the message “congratulations rebeccaholdsworth1! You have won!” has a nasty, mocking undertone which I do not care for. Have I won? Really? I’m starting to think that this cellotaped Annie Hall poster I bought, complete with biro-d on third nipple, means I’ve lost. Or that I’m a loser. Take your pick. When you finally bring yourself to log out of eBay hell, the departing message is the salt in the wound:

You’ve signed out. See you again soon.The bastards, they know they’ll see me again soon. It’s like crack, but with the added faff of Paypal.

So what’s stopping you? Sign up today! Hello Cherwellreader675! Welcome to eBay! One of the UK’s strangest shopping destinations. Waste time and money! Huge selections of rubbish on eBay. Don’t Shop Now!

Women’s Hour

0

Eighty years ago, the establishment of a professional women’s football league in this country was simply unthinkable. Having been banned by the FA and with no funding, the vision looked to be a bleak one. Fast-forward to 2011 and this once seemingly impossible vision has come to be realized in the form of the WSL and it is one being embraced by an increasing number of women of all ages and ability. Whilst the game lacks the glitz and glamour of its male counterparts, it is gaining recognition from around the world and in turn helping women to find a balance between work and play.

Women’s football has been established in England for more than a century, and yet it has only been since the turn of the 1990s that the game really evolved. Up till then, women’s football remained detached from the wider FA, with the Women’s FA left to organize their own football in the UK. The watershed moment eventually came in the 1990s when the FA, having come to recognise the growing emergence of the women’s form of the game, took the decision to administer both the men’s and women’s game under the wider FA umbrella. Since then, the women’s game hasn’t looked back. Just over a month ago, the FA released figures relating to the growth of the game in the UK. The figures are impressive on both a local and national scale. Of the 2.1 million children participating in The FA Tesco Skills Programme, 42% are girls, whilst 106 of the Skills Coaches are females. In fact, there are now over 23,000 women coaches who have achieved a Level 1-5 Coaching badge. On the playing side of things, the figures show a consistent increase in the number of female youth teams being formed – 6,461 in the 2009-2010 season in comparison to 6,027 in the previous season. The effects of these initiatives and enthusiasm have, more importantly, had a hugely positive effect on the national team.

In recent years, the ‘Three Lionesses’, as they are known, have come on leaps and bounds, so much so that they are now being talked about as one of the favourites for this year’s World Cup taking place in Germany. Whilst the U19s have reached the European Championship Final on three of the last four occasions, lifting the trophy in 2009 in Belarus, the senior team have followed suit, reaching the quarter-finals of the last World Cup and the final of the 2009 European Championships in Finland, eventually losing out to Germany. Such has been the rise of the women’s national game on the global stage, that – contrary to many reports – two Englishwomen were nominated for awards at last year’s Ballon D’Or – star striker Kelly Smith for the women’s World Player of the Year and England national team coach, Hope Powell, for women’s Coach of the Year. More importantly the FA has, since 2009, placed seventeen England players on central contracts – essentially enabling them to work part-time whilst simultaneously allowing for more training. Arsenal Ladies, despite being one of the most successful teams in England, only usually train for just two evenings a week! The four-year deal which will be renewed annually will see players paid from a pot worth £1.28 million and will be governed by the Women’s and Girls Football Strategy, established in 2008. With over 50 FA Centres of Excellence in existence across the UK for talented girls, the start of the inaugural professional FA WSL in April marks a new goal for young players coming into the sport to aim for.

The FA’s WSL marks a watershed moment for the women’s game in this country. In establishing the league, the FA has very much modelled itself on leagues in Holland and Germany, in particular, where the women’s form of the game has grown. Whilst the stadiums used will be small-capacity ones, it is the pricing initiative of the games which is the most pleasing to read about. Tickets will be priced at £5 for adults and £3 for children, with the focus being on creating a family atmosphere, filling the grounds as well as attracting younger faces to the game. From a players’ perspective, the stand-out feature is that players from the eight teams will be paid for the very first time. A salary cap has been set, whereby only four players per club will earn more than £20,000 a year – something which the FA hopes will ensure an even distribution of talent throughout the league. It therefore means a chance to give up ones day job and to instead concentrate on ones real passion – football. However, what the establishment of the WSL signifies, above all, is what the women’s game has been craving for for many years now – recognition through television coverage. The league, running from April to August, will see games televised live on EPSN who will also provide a weekly 30-minuts highlights show. Although no income will be received as a result of the coverage, the FA will not be expected to cover the production costs for ESPN – something of a rarity in women’s sport. Nonetheless, fears of foreign imports coming into the game and players being lured abroad by larger salaries remain.

Whilst the dream that was once held by women playing football around the country of being able to earn money by playing football, has now been realized, the blunt truth is that several top English players, including Kelly Smith, have already been lured to move to the USA to join the Women’s Professional Soccer League, albeit it before the establishment of the WSL. For the record, an average seven-month contract for a woman footballer in the USA is worth £24,000. Of course, money is not their sole motivation however there’s no doubt that it is certainly an important factor. Smith herself, on her move to the Boston Breakers, was quoted as saying that “it was not just about money, it’s about playing with and against the best players in the world, training every day and everything else about being a professional footballer”. The FA will hope that the WSL will help to stem this tide, albeit a small one. And whilst some move to pastures new, there is a familiar cry from the Barclays Premier League which is already beginning to ring in the WSL circles – that of the influx of foreign internationals into the game. Some teams, such as Chelsea and Doncaster Belles, have already imported foreign players whilst others, for example Lincoln, have expressed their intention to follow in their footpaths. Whilst it may be proving difficult for some teams to find players of the necessary quality needed for the league, it is hoped that the WSL will come to modernize the development of English players and thus create a bright future for women’s football in this country.

Despite significant developments made by the women’s game in recent years, the reality is that much more still needs to be done in order to raise the game’s profile. A large chunk of this can be attributed to the failure of the FA to capture the public’s imagination. In Germany, the women’s Bundesliga has attracted a great deal of support and popularity and even our friends across the pond have shown more support for the game, that despite supposedly having no real footballing tradition as such. Indeed, whilst the 2009 European Championships attracted some television coverage, the game largely remains confined to small column inches in newspaper sports section. Nonetheless, a great deal of credit should be given to The Guardian Newspaper, in particular, whose devotion to covering Women’s Football in this country is very pleasing to see. Although criticism has been levelled at the game by some who believe that the quality is no way near that of the men’s game in relation to speed, athleticism and, above all, technique, there is still plenty of time for that to improve. The view held by many within the game is that within a short space of time, the game will come to be able to hold its own and thus no longer need to rely on financial support from the FA. However, regardless of the length of time taken for the game to evolve, if it helps to raise the profile to younger girls and women across the country thus increasing standards within the game and creating a wider pool of players to choose from, then the WSL would have already played a huge role in the development of the women’s game in this country.

It’s incredible to think that whilst football remains by far and away the most popular participatory sport for women in the UK, its icons remain virtually unheard of. Although the WSL is a fresh, innovate idea, it is perhaps too late a reaction to the already well established professional leagues abroad. Whilst the WSL is the pinnacle of what has been achieved by the game here in the UK, challenges still remain ahead. The challenge for women’s football is to find its very own role-model and answer to Athletics’ Jessica Ennis, Cycling’s Victoria Pendleton, Rowing’s Rebecca Romero and Swimming’s Rebecca Adlington. This form of the game though, unlike its male counterpart, is free of agents and lavish lifestyles and instead played by those whose sole motivation is for the love of the game itself – something many can aspire to. Move over boys, it is very much time for women’s hour!

Cherworld Week 7

“You start change from the ground up, and I really think it’s tiny niggly things that have become totally normal to us that are the most obvious aspects of Oxford that need to change…”

As Brasenose JCR reacts to fossilized Anglican rituals at formal with bad grace, Beth and Robin return to talk over the place of Latin liturgy in twenty-first century Oxford.

Produced by Evie Deavall and Oliver Moody

Thought for Week 8: Stephen Fry

“I would be greatly indebted to the man who could tell me whatever could be appealing about those damp, dark, foul-smelling and tufted areas that constitute the main dishes in the banquet of love.”

Luke Maxted and Robin McGhee discuss the stormy marriage of the emotions and the intellect in student life, looking at the Cambridge years of the patron saint of British culture, Stephen Fry.

Produced by Oliver Moody

Interview: Johann Hari

0

Johann Hari shifts uneasily in his seat. The camera flashes, and he winces theatrically. It\’s clear he\’s more than a little uncomfortable. Yet this awkward shyness seems somewhat strange, given that he has gained a reputation over the past decade as one of the most confident, outspoken and intelligent journalists in the country, and has long been a regular on programmes like The Review Show, 10 O\’Clock Live and Question Time, and it becomes downright baffling when you consider his new, trim figure. Once a podgy, rotund lover of junk food, Hari vowed to turn his eating and exercise habits around when he was presented with a special loyalty card by the staff at his local KFC, and even wrote an extended article about his new fitness regime. Nonetheless, the slimline Johann still dislikes the camera, and after sipping his smoothie timidly from a straw, makes the solemn request: \’Don\’t ever let me see these pictures!\’

This marks just one facet of Hari\’s intense self-awareness, and while he might dislike how he looks, he\’s far more comfortable with how he sounds. While he admits, \’My default mode is just whiney, preachy,\’ this is an indispensable part of his appeal. His penchant of pointing out uncomfortable truths and giving a voice to the disadvantaged has made him one of the most renowned columnists in the country, and has earned him praise and disdain in equal measure. His list of accolades is eye-wateringly impressive, but he dismisses this with an uncertain shrug. ‘Most of these awards are kind of bollocks… The times when you feel good are not that kind of thing, but when you get a fifteen year old gay kid writing to you saying, \”I\’ve been treated really badly and your article gave me hope to carry on,\” or something. That\’s much more powerful than any of those things… The degree of interaction with your readership now is just amazing and incredibly enriching.\’

However, the positive feedback he receives from readers is invariably matched by the regular arrival of vitriolic hate mail. ‘I get loads. Well, I always feel like I\’m not doing something right if I\’m not getting loads of hate mail.\’ Does it mostly come from very right wing readers? ‘They come from an incredibly broad spectrum of people who hate me… It can be really random. Like after I criticised the Dalai Lama, I got the world\’s first ever Buddhist death threat.\’ In fact, death threats are not out of the ordinary for Hari, and he\’s almost casual about receiving them. ‘I forward them to the police and they deal with it.\’ Is it, in a perverse way, quite encouraging? He pauses, before laughing, ‘It\’s a sure sign they don\’t have a very good argument if they\’re threatening to kill you.\’

Since reading Christopher Hitchens\’ infamous exposé of Mother Teresa, The Missionary Position, at the age of 15, Hari knew he wanted to be a journalist, and spent most of his time at Cambridge pursuing this goal. ‘I did a lot of student journalism… I remember at the start of my second year, the leader of China came to Cambridge, and the university just absolutely fawned, rolled out the red carpet, and I just remember, in my quite naïve student way, thinking, ‘Ooh, but what about all the people he\’s killing?\” I remember being quite startled just trying to get anyone from within the university – God knows how naïve I was – to even criticise the Tiananmen Square Massacre.\’

From here, Hari progressed rapidly. He left Cambridge with a first – though dismisses this accolade with a shake of the head, saying, ‘I did Socio Political Science, which is quite an easy subject\’ – quickly made his way onto the New Statesman, and by the time he was 23, had been given a twice-weekly column in The Independent. I recite this list, only for him to respond with another shrug. ‘I was very lucky.\’ Though his talent is evident, it seems somewhat surprising just how successful he has been, given that so much of what he writes is so far to the left of the media discourse. ‘Yeah, well the media discourse is shaped by the fact that newspapers are… paid for by billionaires and corporate advertisers, and the degree to which you can diverge from the interests of those billionaires and corporate advertisers is very limited… Most British newspapers would never employ someone who says things like me.\’ Has The Independent ever refused to run one of his articles? ‘No. Actually, I\’m quite proud of this. The Independent has literally never once, ever, said, \”You can\’t say that\”. The one time ever they didn\’t run an article of mine, they said, \”We can\’t run this for another week.\” The last Pope was about to die, and I wrote an article that was going to be headlined, \”Why I will not grieve for this evil Pope,\” and they said, \”Look, he might actually die tonight, and then people will wake up tomorrow and that will be the thing in the newspaper. Just give it a week\”.\’

As a journalist, Hari\’s focus is almost always acutely fixed on the more serious and important issues of contemporary life, and he is continually confronting difficult truths. However, he spent much of his earlier career covering more light-hearted fare, including an interview with Busted. ‘That was my idea. I kind of suspected I\’d dislike them and I thought it would be a funny interview, but I did not suspect I would loathe them as much as I did. I thought they were absolutely hateful.\’ More recently, there was the extremely popular article on his weight loss; I ask if this is a sign of a new, less serious direction in his writing, but he denies it. ‘I wouldn\’t want to be someone who was writing every week on how I learnt to stop eating Big Macs. Although there\’s a place for that kind of journalism, it\’s just not what I want to do. I think everyone\’s got a responsibility to talk about things that matter.\’ Yet in highlighting the hypocrisy of others, isn\’t there a danger of failing to meet those standards yourself? ‘I know what you mean, but I don\’t think so, because I definitely never present myself as a kind of moral paragon.\’

He\’s as unforgiving of his own faults as he is of other people\’s, and currently is one of the government\’s most vocal critics. Is he at all optimistic about the future of the coalition? ‘I\’m optimistic they might lose… They\’ve been even worse than I thought they\’d be.\’ Does he view Clegg as beyond redemption then? ‘Well, if you think about the whole Cleggmania during the election, now it seems like those Christmas number one singles that everyone buys as a joke. It\’s like Blobbymania, isn\’t it? You just think, what the fuck was that? We look back three years later and think, my God, why did we buy this shit?\’ I ask him if there\’s a danger of seeming too downbeat in his views, and he agrees that this is a concern. ‘The worst thing you can tell people is, \”The world is shit. Bye!\” You know, I\’m not a pessimist… I think it\’s always about trying to say, here\’s a problem and here\’s how it can be resolved.\’

It seems that Hari\’s own principles won\’t let him avoid certain issues, and if that means making a few enemies, then so be it. In fact, I get the sense that he rather relishes the combat: as the interview draws to a close and he asks for the bill, he is happy to pour scorn on some of his fellow journalists, including Giles Coren – ‘I think he\’s fucking repulsive… I really loathe him\’ – and Toby Young – ‘He\’s such a bellend.\’ Has this ever led to any awkward encounters? ‘I met George Osborne once. It was a really weird experience… There was a dinner for Andrew Sullivan, and George Osborne was there – this was about three years ago – and he completely blanked me. This hasn\’t happened to me since I was a teenager. I don\’t mean he mostly ignored me, I mean literally, I said hello, and he blanked me repeatedly throughout the whole night. Whenever I spoke, he just looked away. It was absolutely bizarre, and I thought, how unbelievably thin-skinned he must be.\’

It is little wonder than Johann Hari gets up as many people\’s noses as he does. He\’s made a career out of sticking to his principles, and seems to almost enjoy the hostility that he elicits in others. As we get up to leave the restaurant, he reflects, ‘I feel like I\’ve been unusually unobnoxious in this interview…\’ He\’s as unwilling to compromise in person as he is in writing, yet throughout our chat remains unfailingly polite and friendly. Is he uncomfortable being confronted in person? ‘The first person who ever recognised me on the street was the worst time this has ever happened… It was about six months after I\’d started at The Independent, I\’d just got off the tube and a woman came up to me and said, ‘Excuse me, are you Johann Hari?\’ and I said, ‘Yes, I am!\’ I was really chuffed, and she said, ‘You make me sick,\’ and spat at my feet and stormed off, but didn\’t say why!\’ Buddhist, probably. ‘Yeah, exactly. Bitch.\’

 

Intelligent Design

0

 The term ‘cosmopolitan’ may seem rather cliché, particularly within the realms of design. Yet the interior designer Alessandra Branca is certainly the embodiment of a cultural melting pot in her approach to and inspiration for interior design.  Melding a cocktail of influences, from a childhood in Rome to her current life in America, Branca is a venerable menagerie of innovation when it comes to decorating your abode.  Her work has been described as incorporating \’the comfort of the British, the chic of the French, the passion of the Italians and the wherewithal of the Americans.\’

 \’It’s interesting that each of those places is somewhere someone in my family came from — my father’s mother was French, my father English, and my mother is Italian.’ Her background as a dealer in antique prints, which she had collected since the age of 14, alongside her Italian roots, clearly comes through in her work.  It is classic — but the inevitable twist comes with an injection of vibrant personality and enthusiasm for life.  Visiting the Branca store in Chicago I was struck by layer upon layer of beautiful antiques and objects —it has a certain Wunderkammer feel — yet also by some of the intriguing curiosities placed amongst splashes of vivid colour.  African headdresses and riding boot trees reinvented as lamp stands particularly caught my eye.  Despite such talent for design, a sense of humour doesn’t fail her.  Laughing, she muses on her sartorial display – \’as my husband would say, it looks like I feel into a cubist sofa!\’

 Discussing her past work as a fashion buyer it becomes clear that interior design is a platform through which to explore other areas of human life.  She notes an example of such interconnectedness in the influence late 18th Century fashion had on furniture design in Europe. \’As women wore more comfortable dresses, without hoops, people started making sofas that were deeper and thus more comfortable.  This started way back with the Romans — people lay down all the time on divans, so clothing had to be soft and able to move.  Everything is connected, fashion and furniture are about living and both of them are very important to each other.\’

 Such influence of interior design on human social life also comes through in a more direct way in her role — ‘I’ve become the best marriage counsellor you’ll ever meet!’  Mediating the intricacies of as large an investment as a home is an emotionally delicate one. As a designer she aims to locate the ‘common ground’ — some people struggle to articulate the visual, in which case her role as a psychoanalyst comes to the fore in essentially reflecting on ‘how they feel when they feel best, memories from home and from travels when they felt completely comfortable, happy and excited.’  For others keen to indulge their own styles she is more of a ‘portrait artist’ — ‘if I don’t show a home that is an extension of them rather than me, then I haven’t done my job.’

 She cites moving to America as key to developing her work philosophy — ‘you do learn to problem solve and to organise information from the Americans — i mean the work ethic is unbelievable.’  The land of Bernini and espressos has remained similarly fundamental however — ‘Italians do show a bit more — but really in the end Italian homes are about architecture, space, colour and light. The Americans are not as comfortable in their homes. Comfort is the one thing that I make a huge effort to bring to a home.’  A black and white house plan morphs into an approach to design ‘like a business plan’ — taking a temporal view to how the house will be used — which is then ‘organised by subject, not by room.’  Colour and form are then explored within the context of the space to see what is going to work — ‘good design has to work, it can’t just look great.  It’s like healthy body/healthy mind — you’ve got to have both.’

 Continually reading and learning is key to maintaining a flowing current of ideas — ‘the more you educate yourself the better.’  Discussing the trials and tribulations of the potential of stylish studentdom, she again exudes characteristic optimism — ‘student living is a fantastic place to practice making the most out of very little space – realising yourself, your needs, and your interests. I think the fun thing is that this is where so much is born — it’s the best time of your life, it really is.’ Champagne studentdom — reign on!

 New Classic Interiors (Stewart, Tabori, & Chang) is out now, RRP £34.99; All sales proceeds are donated to inner-city educational programs.

Review: Lemonworld (New Writing Festival)

0

Lemons make you pull a face.

Lemonworld, the new short play by Matt Fuller, a product of OUDS\’ New Writing Festival running this week at the Burton Taylor, won\’t. It does, however, share with its namesake its shape; far from turning out pear-shaped, this production is competent and assured in every aspect of the production, but takes a while to get into.

The main body of the play is engaging and thought-provoking, and rounds off into a nicely redemptive concluding point. The story, which concerns itself with the dynamic between a young man struggling to come to terms with the death of his mother (Adam Scott Taylor); his dependent brother (Dylan Townley) who aspires to become a playwright and his troubled lady friend neighbour, tempestuous tempress Ada (Sarah Perry), asks questions of art, of grief, of human relationships, and is reassuringly hopeful in its outlook. It seems to lack, however, a real sense of pace and scope; the omnipresence of the boys\’ dead mother and Ada\’s abusive partner, neither of whom appear onstage, feels a little tired, and the dialogue at times veers toward the mundane. The play\’s meta-meditation on the nature of theatre, and its humorous analysis of the life of the playwright, is a particular highlight, and is refreshing in its consciously naïve and light-hearted self-reflexivity.

The low-key, this-could-be-happening-in-the-house-next-door mood of the piece is affected well by the ‘well-lived in\’ (messy) set of the boys\’ apartment, and by Scott Taylor\’s understated embodiment of the everyman, trying with the best of intentions to find his way in the world. Townley\’s portrayal of the awkward, childlike playwright-to-be is touching in its simplicity, and Sarah Perry\’s Ava brings to the play the urgency and humour which really propels the plot and engages the audience. Archie Cornish\’s direction captures the reality of the situations within the play, and walks nicely the line between everyday experience and the theatrical extraordinary, encouraging in the performers a vodka-and-lemonade blend of humour and poignancy. The audience travelled along with the characters on their respective journeys perfectly well through their dialogue and action, and the choice of musical accompaniment between scene changes felt a little extraneous, but would doubtlessly would appeal to those with a taste for soul-searching singer-songwriters.

Altogether, Lemonworld makes for an enjoyable and worthwhile experience; it won\’t leave the bitter taste in your mouth which I am not sure as to whether or not was its intention, but is certainly theatrically refreshing, and well deserves its place in the thespian fruitbowl of the New Writing Festival.

Â