Blog Page 1866

Campaigners hold ‘teach-out’ to protest cuts

0

A group of campaigners and protesters held a public event which they termed a “teach-out” in central Oxford on Monday afternoon.

The event, which took place in Bonn Square opposite Westgate Shopping Centre, was organised by the Oxford University Campaign for Higher Education, and advertised with the tag-line “The Alternative to Austerity”. It aimed to criticise the government’s cuts to public services, and to support the public sector strike planned for Wednesday.

The afternoon saw speeches from lecturers and campaigners on the NHS, pensions, and higher education.  These were interspersed with unprepared contributions from passers-by: shoppers making their way through the square were offered leaflets, and the chance to air their opinions over the microphone.

Matt Myers, a fresher reading History at Wadham and one of the organisers of the “teach-out”, told Cherwell that the event was designed to give ordinary people a voice. He said, “Our political system is very élitist, as we only get the chance to have our say every five years when there’s a general election. Today is about allowing people to take part in a political process: it’s a model for the society we want to create.”

When asked if he thought the event would have an impact on government policy, Myers said, “Events like this aren’t going to change the political situation in this country, but it’s still important to get people discussing these issues face to face, outside of the national newspapers and the BBC.”

Rob Jackson, a London student who lives in Oxford and who also helped organise the event, said that it was important “to take people out of the university to hold lectures in public places and support the strikes on Wednesday.”

He added, “My parents’ generation was the first to go to university – I don’t want to be the last. I wouldn’t have gone to university if fees had been £9,000 a year.”

Student opinion on the “teach-out” was mixed. Imogen Jones, a third-year classicist at Corpus Christi, reacted positively to the event. She said, “Any peaceful protest against unnecessary and unfair cuts is a sign that the British people are engaged in politics, and are expressing their democratic rights.” Jones also praised the campaigners’ message, arguing, “What’s going on in higher education is terrible.”

Nick Dickinson, a second-year History and Politics student, agreed that the event was “a legitimate form of protest”. Referring to the campaigners’ method of making passionate speeches to passers-by, he remarked, “It seems to work for those crazy gospel guys on Cornmarket!”

However, not all students were equally convinced. Colette Weston, an Oxford graduate visiting for the day, questioned the name “teach-out”, commenting sarcastically, “What a great name…” 

Jan Willem Scholten, a third-year PPEist, said, “I think it’s admirable that people venture out into the cold for what is ultimately a futile way to spend Monday of 8th week.”

Union election results announced

0

Izzy Ernst was elected unopposed as President-Elect of the Oxford Union in last Friday’s election. Ernst, who boasted “proven (German!) efficiency” on her manifesto, served as Union Librarian this term, and will take up the presidency in Trinity 2012.

Also elected unopposed was Maria Rioumine, who will be Treasurer in Trinity.

In the contest for Librarian-Elect, Dean Palmer beat Sebastian Leape by a mere 19 votes, gaining 543 votes compared to Leape’s 524. Meanwhile Rajiv Dattani beat James Price in the race for Secretary, with 542 votes compared to Price’s 484.

Elected to Standing Committee for next term were, in this order, Joseph D’Urso, Jocelyn Poon, Kevin Tan, Maddie Grant, and Rebecca Scott.

Overall turnout in the election was 1248 voters

Review: Brian Eno & Rick Holland – Panic Of Looking

0

The worst thing about wrapping up leftovers and putting them in the fridge is that there is usually a reason that they are left over. Perhaps you, glutton that you are, overdid it the first time around; perhaps they are the leftover spuds that no one particularly wanted; perhaps it just wasn’t very good the first time around. Sixteen minutes of the leftovers of Brian Eno and Rick Holland’s ambient-electronica-meets-spoken-word previous exertions provokes a similar response as opening the fridge door the following day. I’m still struggling to stomach it.

It is worth acknowledging at this point that Brian Eno really is very, very good, and that if anyone is to be entrusted with painting a convincing intergalactic electronic soundscape, it is probably him. For the most part, Eno’s contribution is taut and textured as ever, and his background sonics are by no means the worst part of the EP. ‘In The Future’ is the most listenable example. These are as minimal as you might expect – and sometimes so much so as to be rather difficult to engage with. At its best, it is moody and poignant; at its worst, desultory, or even boring. Eno can still do what he has always done, and there are some truly stunning misty moments of crepuscular atmosphere.

So much for the background, what of the words? Lots of people who ‘know’ seem to think that Rick Holland is a reasonable poet. I don’t know whether my failure to appreciate it represents a Philistine tendency on my own part – I can only very barely read – but I’m not feeling it. Even my heartiest attempts at serious engagement with the EP are dashed when I hear the expression ‘sex-face’. Worst of all, I realize that it is all over when I start to make comparisons to the William Shatner covers. 

In conclusion: Eno is good, I don’t really like Holland, spoken word is really weird. The fusion sits a little heavily. I anticipate similar responses from the rest of the uninformed masses – though I suspect that Eno junkies or macramé wearing spoken word fans may see the EP as a glorious sixteen-minute study. For everyone else – you might find yourself, as I did, bored, bothered and bewildered. Frankly, I don’t give a damn.

Sports Debate: Women’s sport is irrelevant

 

As someone who is completely physically incapable, watching sport is about watching people do things I can’t. I watch Hollyoaks and feel confident that my acting ability far surpasses that of Claire Cooper and Hollie-Jay Bowes (Michaela and Jacqui MacQueen). I watch The Weakest Link and convince myself that I would come home with the cash.
By its very nature, sport is competitive. People give up their precious time and money to revel in watching the best in the world performing feats we know to be beyond anything us mere mortals could achieve. This slightly loses its impact when watching women run relatively slowly and throw relatively badly.
Women’s sport just isn’t the same spectacle of human prowess.  We lack the strength, the testosterone, and intensity of our male counterparts.
There have been instances where so called ‘Battle of the Sexes’ matches have been contested, most notably in tennis (incidentally the major global sport where the men’s and women’s events are accorded equal status, although we shall leave the equal prize money in relation to playing time debate for now). In the late ‘90s, the Williams sisters claim that they could beat any man ranked outside the top 200 was put to the test by Karsten Braach, ranked 203 and most notable for his habit of smoking a cigarette or two during end changeovers. 
He dispatched them both, losing a mere three games in the process. Women’s sport may be exciting, it may be entertaining, and you may occasionally catch a glimpse up Anna Kournikova’s skirt (obviously I’m joking) – but you’re always going to have that nagging feeling that you could be watching the men’s versions, where real limits of human ability are being tested. 
And then there is the very pressing concern of aesthetics. I like men, and I like men playing sport most of all. There are lots of beautiful women in the world: objectified in music videos, cheapened on the pages of magazines and unnecessarily sexualised in films. If you want to look at stunning blondes with stunning bodies, you do not need volleyball. Gender inequalities have left us heterosexual women with a limited number of sources for visual gratification. Sportsmen provide an unlimited supply of eye-candy. 
Djokovic, Messi and Dan Carter are the world’s number ones. Women who win will always just be second best to their male counterparts – why do anything if you are not going to be number one (exactly the reason I engage in no physical activity)? Oh, and the women’s World Cup definitely suffers from having no Beckham and his biceps. 

Proposition – Agnes Arnold-Forster – Cherwell Editor

 

As someone who is completely physically incapable, watching sport is about watching people do things I can’t. I watch Hollyoaks and feel confident that my acting ability far surpasses that of Claire Cooper and Hollie-Jay Bowes (Michaela and Jacqui MacQueen). I watch The Weakest Link and convince myself that I would come home with the cash.

By its very nature, sport is competitive. People give up their precious time and money to revel in watching the best in the world performing feats we know to be beyond anything us mere mortals could achieve. This slightly loses its impact when watching women run relatively slowly and throw relatively badly.

Women’s sport just isn’t the same spectacle of human prowess.  We lack the strength, the testosterone, and intensity of our male counterparts.

There have been instances where so called ‘Battle of the Sexes’ matches have been contested, most notably in tennis (incidentally the major global sport where the men’s and women’s events are accorded equal status, although we shall leave the equal prize money in relation to playing time debate for now). In the late ‘90s, the Williams sisters claim that they could beat any man ranked outside the top 200 was put to the test by Karsten Braach, ranked 203 and most notable for his habit of smoking a cigarette or two during end changeovers. He dispatched them both, losing a mere three games in the process.

Women’s sport may be exciting, it may be entertaining, and you may occasionally catch a glimpse up Anna Kournikova’s skirt (obviously I’m joking) – but you’re always going to have that nagging feeling that you could be watching the men’s versions, where real limits of human ability are being tested. 

And then there is the very pressing concern of aesthetics. I like men, and I like men playing sport most of all. There are lots of beautiful women in the world: objectified in music videos, cheapened on the pages of magazines and unnecessarily sexualised in films. If you want to look at stunning blondes with stunning bodies, you do not need volleyball. Gender inequalities have left us heterosexual women with a limited number of sources for visual gratification. Sportsmen provide an unlimited supply of eye-candy.

Djokovic, Messi and Dan Carter are the world’s number ones. Women who win will always just be second best to their male counterparts – why do anything if you are not going to be number one (exactly the reason I engage in no physical activity)?

Oh, and the women’s World Cup definitely suffers from having no Beckham and his biceps. 

 

Opposition – Ellie Swinton – Cherwell sport deputy editor

 

In mid February of my first year at Oxford, I was in the college bar and one of the boys asked me why I wasn’t drinking. I said it was because Varsity lacrosse was less than two weeks away and our team had undergone a self-enforced drinking ban in the run-up to the game; a standard procedure which no one would even blink at for a men’s sport. 

I got the reply: “A whole two week drinking ban for women’s lacrosse? That is a joke!” I didn’t get angry, I’m used to it by now. Instead I quietly contented myself with the knowledge that this one boy at St Peter’s is increasingly in the minority, and that popularity of women’s sport is growing by the day. 

If there was once a time where women’s sports was not played to the same standard as men’s or when it was nowhere near as highly regarded, that is not the case today: times are changing, and very quickly at that.

Women’s sport at Oxford is in no way irrelevant. Atalanta’s Society was founded in 1992 and its growth in almost 20 years is astonishing. The club brings together Oxford’s leading sportswomen and promotes women’s sport both within and outside of the university. 

In some sports, for example lacrosse, the women’s game was established first, is arguably played at a higher standard and attracts far more supporters at the Varsity match against Cambridge.

The popularity of women’s sport worldwide is also growing everyday. Many people would rather watch the women’s side of the draw at Wimbledon over the men’s; let’s be honest, watching ace after ace frankly just gets boring after a while. 

With less and less net play these days, mixed doubles is arguably the most entertaining game. Women’s football is a more tactical, fun game to watch because of the slower pace and women’s gymnastics at the Olympics, a sport associated with flexibility and grace, has far higher viewer ratings.

Despite all this, there has always been a shockingly poor amount of media coverage for women’s sports. ESPN supposedly stands for Entertainment Sports Programming Network but they may as well have put an “M” for Men’s before the E. 

Besides, it doesn’t make sense that that the USA’s men’s soccer team are ranked around 15th in the world and receive nationwide support, yet the media overlooks the US women, the world’s number one team. 

Women’s sport is NOT irrelevant and if the media would just acknowledge this, popularity for the women’s game would increase exponentially; they have the support and high standard of play but are not given the coverage they deserve.

 

Thrills, spills and goals galore

0

 

Football fans everywhere have been saying that this season’s Premier League has thus far been the best ever. Over the past decade however, in terms of excitement and sheer unpredictability, the Premier League hasn’t even been the best league in England. So what makes this year so different? There hasn’t been a huge glut in goals – at this point last year,only seven fewer goals had been scored. On the other hand, the number of high-scoring, high-profile games has been an exception, and  there are a number of reasons why.
People have lazily branded Chelsea manager Andre Vilas-Boas as the new Jose Mourinho, but tactically he couldn’t be more different. Under Vilas-Boas Chelsea press high all over the pitch, holding a high line to suffocate the opposition – something completely anathema to  Mourinho when he was at Chelsea. Such a high line was one of the main reasons they conceded five at home to Arsenal, where a slow, high defence came up against the pace of Theo Walcott and Gervinho., while even the unglamourous Grant Holt of Norwich caused them problems by often getting in behind the defence. While Chelsea epitomise this trend, Manchester United’s decision not to play a defensive midfielder sitting in front of the defence has also caused them to play higher up the pitch too.
A well-worn cliché used after the thrilling 1-0 victory for QPR over Chelsea several weeks ago was that it was “a brilliant advert for the Premier League”. If a complete lack of discipline on the one hand and a remarkable inability to keep possession on the other is what the League wanted to advertise then Chelsea and QPR respectively did a fairly good job, but what that game did emphasise is the higher number of red cards we have seen this season. The average number of red cards per game over the past five seasons has flirted around 0.15. This season, there have been just over 0.2 red cards a game – and in some of the biggest fixtures too. Liverpool conceded four against Spurs when they were down to nine men, while Manchester United played with ten men for 35 minutes against Manchester City. Both teams were chasing the game, and so inevitably the scoreline boomed.
Coincidentally, it so happens that the top teams in the league have morphed into more potent attacking units, while simultaneously becoming weaker defensively. Also, in the last five years the Premier League has lost managers Rafael Benitez and Jose Mourinho who both based of their approaches on conceding fewer goals than the opposition rather than scoring more. Manchester United’s acquisition of strikers and wingers over the last three years has led to a more open approach – they had conceded the most shots on goal in the league (97) after six weeks in, which is remarkable for the defending champions. Now that Cesc Fabregas and Samir Nasri have left Arsenal, their focal point of attack is striker Robin van Persie, so they naturally move the ball quicker up the field, resulting in chances being created more at speed for both teams. Roberto Mancini’s evolution of Manchester City is nearly complete, with this season seeing a more potent counter-attacking aspect to their team. All of this has resulted in an incredible 29 goals in the four matches between the Champions League clubs in the league.

Football fans everywhere have been saying that this season’s Premier League has thus far been the best ever. Over the past decade however, in terms of excitement and sheer unpredictability, the Premier League hasn’t even been the best league in England. So what makes this year so different? There hasn’t been a huge glut in goals – at this point last year,only seven fewer goals had been scored. On the other hand, the number of high-scoring, high-profile games has been an exception, and  there are a number of reasons why.

People have lazily branded Chelsea manager Andre Vilas-Boas as the new Jose Mourinho, but tactically he couldn’t be more different. Under Vilas-Boas Chelsea press high all over the pitch, holding a high line to suffocate the opposition – something completely anathema to  Mourinho when he was at Chelsea. Such a high line was one of the main reasons they conceded five at home to Arsenal, where a slow, high defence came up against the pace of Theo Walcott and Gervinho., while even the unglamourous Grant Holt of Norwich caused them problems by often getting in behind the defence. While Chelsea epitomise this trend, Manchester United’s decision not to play a defensive midfielder sitting in front of the defence has also caused them to play higher up the pitch too.

A well-worn cliché used after the thrilling 1-0 victory for QPR over Chelsea several weeks ago was that it was “a brilliant advert for the Premier League”. If a complete lack of discipline on the one hand and a remarkable inability to keep possession on the other is what the League wanted to advertise then Chelsea and QPR respectively did a fairly good job, but what that game did emphasise is the higher number of red cards we have seen this season. The average number of red cards per game over the past five seasons has flirted around 0.15. This season, there have been just over 0.2 red cards a game – and in some of the biggest fixtures too. Liverpool conceded four against Spurs when they were down to nine men, while Manchester United played with ten men for 35 minutes against Manchester City. Both teams were chasing the game, and so inevitably the scoreline boomed.

Coincidentally, it so happens that the top teams in the league have morphed into more potent attacking units, while simultaneously becoming weaker defensively. Also, in the last five years the Premier League has lost managers Rafael Benitez and Jose Mourinho who both based of their approaches on conceding fewer goals than the opposition rather than scoring more. Manchester United’s acquisition of strikers and wingers over the last three years has led to a more open approach – they had conceded the most shots on goal in the league (97) after six weeks in, which is remarkable for the defending champions. Now that Cesc Fabregas and Samir Nasri have left Arsenal, their focal point of attack is striker Robin van Persie, so they naturally move the ball quicker up the field, resulting in chances being created more at speed for both teams. Roberto Mancini’s evolution of Manchester City is nearly complete, with this season seeing a more potent counter-attacking aspect to their team. All of this has resulted in an incredible 29 goals in the four matches between the Champions League clubs in the league.

Cherwell sport get their skates on

0

 

People usually learn to ice skate when they’re very young. It could be with their parents, at a birthday party or with a boyfriend or girlfriend. But rather than go for one of those clichés, I thought why not learn how to ice-skate in roughly ten minutes and then use my newfound skill in a game of ice hockey? For some strange reason I spent a large proportion of the evening either falling over or flailing my arms about trying to prevent myself from falling over. Despite these minor setbacks however, it was a thoroughly good night.
ALTS is essentially a form of ice hockey designed for beginners who aren’t interested in the violence or competitive nature of the real thing. This means there is no need for the excessive protective gear because it is non contact (except for the keepers, who wear a face mask and gloves), the puck is a great deal lighter and you are not allowed to lift it off the ground. There was blatant disregard for this last rule however. Because attendances at sessions regularly exceed 150 people, the rink is split up into two or three 6-a-side matches that last three minutes each.
Apart from these small differences, the games are played like a normal game of ice hockey. This is very much a sport for beginners,but more skilled players use this as an excuse to turn up and show off their skills. This pretty much eliminated any contribution newcomers could have, but on the plus side it did provide the determination to keep plugging away and eventually take the experts down. 
To put it another way, I was bitterly jealous because I have never felt so helpless and stranded on a sports arena in my life. Furthermore my former background in hockey did not compensate for my ineptitude; rather, it was a hindrance. With the games as short, high-paced and frantic as they are it means that those who are less capable simply cannot keep up with the play and spend a lot of time on their arses.
Putting aside my personal grievances, by the end of the night I had started to get the hang of things and at that point it became much more enjoyable and I even manged touched the puck a couple of times whilst staying upright. This may sound like a small achievement, but to me, it was a huge moment.
Overall there was a very relaxed atmosphere and the scores of the games seemed completely irrelevant. This made a nice change, but for those who wish to develop their skills there have been Cuppers tournaments in the past two years. This is a great way to spend an evening and even though the sessions are at slightly awkward times, it breaks up the monotony of the weekly visits to Park End or Wahoo and brings out the child in you.
Sessions are 2330 – 0115 on Wednesdays and 2345 – 0100 on Fridays and I cannot recommend them enough.

People usually learn to ice skate when they’re very young. It could be with their parents, at a birthday party or with a boyfriend or girlfriend. But rather than go for one of those clichés, I thought why not learn how to ice-skate in roughly ten minutes and then use my newfound skill in a game of ice hockey? For some strange reason I spent a large proportion of the evening either falling over or flailing my arms about trying to prevent myself from falling over. Despite these minor setbacks however, it was a thoroughly good night.

ALTS is essentially a form of ice hockey designed for beginners who aren’t interested in the violence or competitive nature of the real thing. This means there is no need for the excessive protective gear because it is non contact (except for the keepers, who wear a face mask and gloves), the puck is a great deal lighter and you are not allowed to lift it off the ground. There was blatant disregard for this last rule however. Because attendances at sessions regularly exceed 150 people, the rink is split up into two or three 6-a-side matches that last three minutes each.

Apart from these small differences, the games are played like a normal game of ice hockey. This is very much a sport for beginners,but more skilled players use this as an excuse to turn up and show off their skills. This pretty much eliminated any contribution newcomers could have, but on the plus side it did provide the determination to keep plugging away and eventually take the experts down. 

To put it another way, I was bitterly jealous because I have never felt so helpless and stranded on a sports arena in my life. Furthermore my former background in hockey did not compensate for my ineptitude; rather, it was a hindrance. With the games as short, high-paced and frantic as they are it means that those who are less capable simply cannot keep up with the play and spend a lot of time on their arses.

Putting aside my personal grievances, by the end of the night I had started to get the hang of things and at that point it became much more enjoyable and I even manged touched the puck a couple of times whilst staying upright. This may sound like a small achievement, but to me, it was a huge moment.

Overall there was a very relaxed atmosphere and the scores of the games seemed completely irrelevant. This made a nice change, but for those who wish to develop their skills there have been Cuppers tournaments in the past two years. This is a great way to spend an evening and even though the sessions are at slightly awkward times, it breaks up the monotony of the weekly visits to Park End or Wahoo and brings out the child in you.

Sessions are 2330 – 0115 on Wednesdays and 2345 – 0100 on Fridays and I cannot recommend them enough.

 

Alternotives Acapella

0

The Oxford Alternotives Christmas concert ‘Snow business like show business’ is taking place at 7.30 pm on the 29th & 30th November (Tue & Wed 8th Week) in the Magdalen Auditorium.

To buy tickets for Tuesday 29th go to: http://www.wegottickets.com/event/144366

To buy tickets for Wednesday 30th go to: http://www.wegottickets.com/event/144406

Christchurch Regatta splashes off

0

 

On Wednesday afternoon, Christ Church Regatta – the climax of the Michaelmas boatie journey – began in earnest on the waters of the Isis. Christ Church regatta is unique in the Oxford rowing season as it is solely a competition for those new to the sport, pitting the as-yet untested racecraft of novice coxes with the muscle of novice rowers. Throw in thousands of pounds worth of rowing equipment and maybe a swan or two, and understandably, carnage ensues.
It really can be a recipe for disaster. As St Anne’s Boat Club Mens Captain Eddie Rolls informed me, “anything can happen”, and although head-to-head racing lacks the obvious crashing intention that bumps provides, this prediction proved remarkably accurate. Boats designed to be aerodynamic and elegant careered down the river like drunken spiders. Crabs were caught, hulls were scratched and pulses were raised as the next generation of college rowers battled their way through the first round, desperate to avoid the ignominy of the repechage.  
That said, in the wider context of novice Regattas Wednesday was a relatively tame affair. There was none of the tempestuous weather that has charged the atmosphere of previous years (when it hasn’t forced the whole thing to be postponed, curtailed or even called off). There was little carnage or the spilling of blood. I even caught the fine men and women of the St John’s Ambulance stifling their yawns.
Wind, rain and strong currents have prematurely ended three of the last four regattas, but clear skies and sunshine greeted the competitors and spectators on Wednesday. The 500m expanse of water looked like a sheet of glass, at least before the invasion of boat after boat of panicked oarsmen and women. The only other interruption to this halcyon scene were the intermittent cries of a motivational homeless man – complete with Tesco’s finest cider and a cigar – as he urged on helpless women’s boats to “work it”. This man single-handedly spurred on rowers more than any amount of expensive coaching could.
Christ Church regatta is the ultimate arena for the hundreds of novice rowers who have spent the last eight weeks training. All the sweat, lycra and incessant rowing chat comes down to the next few days. Unsurprisingly, therefore, the  dawning of Wednesday saw a hotly contested competition. Out of a total of sixty-two races, at least fifteen finished with a winning margin of less than a length between boats. 
Indeed, a photo finish was required to separate the likes of Keble WA and Exeter WA, who finished a matter of inches apart. At the other end of the spectrum, Hertford MA, Somerville MA and Trinity WA all looked to have strong crews, each victorious by two lengths or more. Although it is tricky to say at this early stage, New College’s fresher intake looks to have particular potential with all three of their mens crews finishing on top, with special mention to their MC who dispatched Oriel MA (traditionally the powerhouses of college rowing) by three lengths.
Despite being a smaller college, Lincoln also looked promising, with all four crews winning their races. Miranda Kent, Head of Lincoln Women’s Lower Boats, cited WA as ones to watch after their progress through to the semi finals of the Nepthys regatta last weekend.
A total of four klaxons over the day does hint at some instances of drama often associated with the rowing of novices. The first came after 20 minutes of racing when Univ MA prematurely landed on their own jetty, just ten meters into the 500 metre course. There were no fatalities.
An honourable mention must also go to the St Anne’s women’s crew who decided to take the blades out of their boat before climbing out themselves, thus resulting in a capsize with all of them on board. The capsize is an extremely rare event in rowing so congratulations are in order for the cold and bedraggled crew, who looked appropriately freezing.
All crews have a reason to look forward. For the first round losers the repechage and a shot at redemption beckons. Wednesday’s victors have earnt a days rest and can now dare to dream of progress deep into the competition.
Onlookers will also be interested to see which colleges appear to have a particularly strong crop, as a good intake of new rowers has a direct impact on future performance in the ongoing Isis dramas of Torpids and Summer Eights in Hilary and Trinity respectively, while those with no talent appearing will be looking forward with trepidation.
Be sure to cover yourself in college stash and bike down to the river this weekend. It promises to be dramatic and entertaining. The best thing about novice rowing is its unpredictability: Each boat is one crab away from despair, and races are often decided by the crew who makes the fewest mistakes, but this means the chance of glory is within reach of everyone. So come on down, enjoy the madness of both the rowing, and the inevitable after parties, where drinking bans will be broken and at least some people will make it to Escape. This is one of the most ‘Oxford’ of events, and it would be a shame to miss it.

On Wednesday afternoon, Christ Church Regatta – the climax of the Michaelmas boatie journey – began in earnest on the waters of the Isis. Christ Church regatta is unique in the Oxford rowing season as it is solely a competition for those new to the sport, pitting the as-yet untested racecraft of novice coxes with the muscle of novice rowers. Throw in thousands of pounds worth of rowing equipment and maybe a swan or two, and understandably, carnage ensues.

It really can be a recipe for disaster. As St Anne’s Boat Club Mens Captain Eddie Rolls informed me, “anything can happen”, and although head-to-head racing lacks the obvious crashing intention that bumps provides, this prediction proved remarkably accurate. Boats designed to be aerodynamic and elegant careered down the river like drunken spiders. Crabs were caught, hulls were scratched and pulses were raised as the next generation of college rowers battled their way through the first round, desperate to avoid the ignominy of the repechage.  

That said, in the wider context of novice Regattas Wednesday was a relatively tame affair. There was none of the tempestuous weather that has charged the atmosphere of previous years (when it hasn’t forced the whole thing to be postponed, curtailed or even called off). There was little carnage or the spilling of blood. I even caught the fine men and women of the St John’s Ambulance stifling their yawns.

Wind, rain and strong currents have prematurely ended three of the last four regattas, but clear skies and sunshine greeted the competitors and spectators on Wednesday. The 500m expanse of water looked like a sheet of glass, at least before the invasion of boat after boat of panicked oarsmen and women. The only other interruption to this halcyon scene were the intermittent cries of a motivational homeless man – complete with Tesco’s finest cider and a cigar – as he urged on helpless women’s boats to “work it”. This man single-handedly spurred on rowers more than any amount of expensive coaching could.

Christ Church regatta is the ultimate arena for the hundreds of novice rowers who have spent the last eight weeks training. All the sweat, lycra and incessant rowing chat comes down to the next few days. Unsurprisingly, therefore, the  dawning of Wednesday saw a hotly contested competition. Out of a total of sixty-two races, at least fifteen finished with a winning margin of less than a length between boats. 

Indeed, a photo finish was required to separate the likes of Keble WA and Exeter WA, who finished a matter of inches apart. At the other end of the spectrum, Hertford MA, Somerville MA and Trinity WA all looked to have strong crews, each victorious by two lengths or more. Although it is tricky to say at this early stage, New College’s fresher intake looks to have particular potential with all three of their mens crews finishing on top, with special mention to their MC who dispatched Oriel MA (traditionally the powerhouses of college rowing) by three lengths.

Despite being a smaller college, Lincoln also looked promising, with all four crews winning their races. Miranda Kent, Head of Lincoln Women’s Lower Boats, cited WA as ones to watch after their progress through to the semi finals of the Nepthys regatta last weekend.

A total of four klaxons over the day does hint at some instances of drama often associated with the rowing of novices. The first came after 20 minutes of racing when Univ MA prematurely landed on their own jetty, just ten meters into the 500 metre course. There were no fatalities.

An honourable mention must also go to the St Anne’s women’s crew who decided to take the blades out of their boat before climbing out themselves, thus resulting in a capsize with all of them on board. The capsize is an extremely rare event in rowing so congratulations are in order for the cold and bedraggled crew, who looked appropriately freezing.

All crews have a reason to look forward. For the first round losers the repechage and a shot at redemption beckons. Wednesday’s victors have earnt a days rest and can now dare to dream of progress deep into the competition.

Onlookers will also be interested to see which colleges appear to have a particularly strong crop, as a good intake of new rowers has a direct impact on future performance in the ongoing Isis dramas of Torpids and Summer Eights in Hilary and Trinity respectively, while those with no talent appearing will be looking forward with trepidation.

Be sure to cover yourself in college stash and bike down to the river this weekend. It promises to be dramatic and entertaining. The best thing about novice rowing is its unpredictability: Each boat is one crab away from despair, and races are often decided by the crew who makes the fewest mistakes, but this means the chance of glory is within reach of everyone. So come on down, enjoy the madness of both the rowing, and the inevitable after parties, where drinking bans will be broken and at least some people will make it to Escape. This is one of the most ‘Oxford’ of events, and it would be a shame to miss it.

Review: King Krule – King Krule

0

I like lots of things about King Krule. I like his vaguely irritating voice – like an odd mix of Suggs and Jamie T. I like that his songs sound like early morning cigarettes on cold days. I particularly like his red hair. Archy Marshall, having ditched old moniker Zoo Kid, is barely legal, but his music is so good you’d never guess. I’m going to be honest here – I like it, a great deal, but my mind isn’t blown.

I have no idea what any of it means – the lyrics, or the noises, or the titles – but I like it anyway. Krule’s music is light on the stark, medium on the minimal and high on the wounded. The EP slides open into ‘363N63’ with gentle instrumentals, rich bass strumming and polyphonic flutters. It’s a real stunner, actually. Second track ‘Bleak Bake’ is angsty and assonant, with swells of sound punctuating that strange, strange voice. As the EP reaches its midpoint, it becomes more beat-driven, though maintains that same melancholy tone. I’m not sure quite how King Krule has captured a sense of nostalgia for early winter 2011 even before it comes to an end.

Closing track ‘The Noose of Jah City’ might just be the highlight of the album. ‘It eats away the brain,’ he says, and it really does. Lyrically, the track is complex and poetic, while the music is a perfect blend of jazzy chords, clumsy bedroom finger-picking and a far-off ambulance siren. Lovely. The EP has a slightly cavernous feel: the vocals appear to be coming from deep down and far away, and certain instrumental moments sound a little like a dolphin in tears. Add to that a sorrowful undercurrent, and the experience is practically submarine. This is not unlike James Blake, but much, much better.

I do not love this EP. I like it, which is probably clear, and I think there is something quite wonderful about it that I can’t quite put my finger on. In short: gently dubby, bluesy tracks with dark introspective lyrics sung in a strange voice. There are surely great things to come from this intriguing young man.

Review: Atlas Sound – Parallax

0

Bradford Cox has been a busy, busy boy.  Not content with the wildly enthusiastic reaction to 2010’s Halcyon Digest from his ‘main’ outfit, Deerhunter, he has chosen to set the bar even higher with Parallax, the third album under his solo moniker, Atlas Sound.

From the outset it is clear that the hyper-prolific songwriter has decided, once again, to re-invent; the cover art is suggestive of a new debonair and forthright slant for the previously murky Cox. Indeed, this uncovered openness extends to the music itself; his songs are more immediate than ever in their melody, and are, arguably, all the better for it. One might expect an album defined by the artist as ‘Science Fiction’ to be knee-deep in enigma, yet, while subjects broached include space, time, love and religion, they are presented in an unabashedly accessible manner.

Opener ‘The Shakes’ sets a clear precedent of warm simplicity for the rest of the album, with a tumbling rhythm and early 90s guitars abound. In digging up and brushing down the vocals which were buried deep under mounds of feedback in previous albums, Cox makes the leap from noise-rock auteur to full-blown crooner, and does it with aplomb.

This is not to say that Atlas Sound has regressed; his trademark atmospheric ambience remains. The marked difference here, though, is that each sound, even the minute-long, stuttering ending to ‘Flagstaff’, is essential to the overall arrangement of the album, contributing to its overall coherence.

Parallax is irrefutably Cox’s personal pet project, but he is still happy to play the Samaritan, enlisting MGMT’s Andrew VanWyngarden (and providing him, presumably, with some much-needed work) to assist on piano duties on the album’s standout track ‘Mona Lisa’, a gorgeously catchy slice of retrospective guitar-pop. Overall, this album sees Cox broaden his musical horizons and embrace the more infectious side of his music, without too much compromise and to a gorgeous, startling effect.