Oxford's oldest student newspaper

Independent since 1920

Blog Page 1960

The Pro

Rugby is undoubtedly one of Oxford University’s strongest sports; so it is perhaps not surprising that the prospect of playing for the Blues lures even those who have already represented their country in the sport. Makoto Tosa, now completing an Advanced Diploma in British & European Studies at Lady Margaret Hall College and playing flanker for the Blues, is one such player. His sporting pedigree is undeniable, after having played for his university team and for the NEC Green Rockets in Japan, Makoto represented the Japan under-23 team whilst still studying at the Kanto Gakuin University.

When in the Japanese under-23 squad Makoto’s training schedule was strenuous; with 4 or 5 compulsory training sessions, gym sessions and a match every week. Despite his university studies, Makoto lived the life of a professional athlete with his coaches telling him how to train, how to eat and how to work within a team. This atmosphere, he admits is a world away from his training with the Oxford Blues which consists of two team training sessions a week. Makoto sees the difference in the superior rugby pedigree of the Oxford players, the majority of whom he says “used to play for pro-academy, national youth or Super 14 teams”, and are far more comfortable training individually.

With such an international sporting achievement under his belt, one may ask why Makoto chose to apply to Oxford University rather than simply taking up rugby as a profession? Even though he still wishes to trial for pro clubs later in his life, Makoto commented that the chance of studying in Oxford was too good an opportunity to miss. With the prospect of improving his English and learning more about Europe at the same time “playing rugby in a good environment” being the deciding factor.

When I asked Makoto this years’ Six Nations tournament, like the majority of pundits in the sport hes thinks France will run away with it. With the varsity match now over, Makoto can turn his attention to the equally important competition of the rugby cuppers plate tournament and aid LMH’s standing in the competition, adding another rugby accolade to his sporting pedigree.

Somerville sustain promotion push

Somerville: 3, Keble: 2

Somerville continued their push for an unlikely promotion place this season with a hard fought win over Keble, surviving a late Keble fight back to take the three points in an entertaining game. Their victory keeps alive hopes of reaching the JCR Premier Division next season.

The welcome spring sunshine and a pitch in good condition encouraged the two teams to play some neat and attractive football in the opening exchanges, but a cutting edge was lacking and neither goalkeeper was required to make a save.

However, Somerville broke the deadlock midway through the first half, Joe Lane meeting Jake Richards corner with a firm header into the top corner. It was an impressive finish from the Somerville striker, seeing as he was near the edge of the penalty box when he met the outswinging ball, but still powered it past the Keble keeper.

The goal gave Somerville a lift and they ended the half unquestionably the better side. Captain Richards was beginning to pull the strings in midfield and his superb through ball was met by hard working left winger Tom Deegan, who couldn’t quite place his shot inside the post. Keble would have been happy to hear the half time whistle, having tested Somerville goalkeeper Rhys Bevan only once during the whole half.

Keble used the half time break to regroup and started the second half at a much quicker tempo. This impressive start was rewarded with an equaliser a few minutes after the restart. A long ball was flicked to Patrick Smith who evaded the challenges of two Somerville defenders before placing a smart finish into the top corner. Keble’s resurgence did not last long however, and Somerville were back in front less than five minutes later thanks to another goal from a corner. This time Ralph Turner met Pete Stewart’s in-swinging cross with a diving header at the near post.

Once more the goal galvanised Somerville and they scored again soon after from yet another set piece. This time a long throw was cleverly flicked on by Alex Portz to his central midfield partner Jig Plowright who powered a header into the bottom corner. At this stage it appeared that Somerville might run away with the game as every attack produced a goalscoring opportunity. Second half substitute Nathaniel Jowitt was unlucky to hit the cross bar twice in as many minutes from two well struck shots. The frame of the Keble goal was again tested soon after as Turner’s long range shot bounced on the bar twice down before falling safely into the Keble goalkeeper’s hands.

Keble responded well to this good fortune and ended the game much stronger, beginning to threaten what had previously looked like it was going to be a routine three points for Somerville. They pulled one goal back as midfielder Alan Willies took advantage of some poor Somerville defending to emphatically head home from a corner, setting up a very interesting final ten minutes.

Despite being driven forward by captain Will Tane, Keble were unable to break through thanks to a combination of impressive Somerville defending and a lack of composure in front of goal.

The result was probably fair given the balance of play, but Somerville will be wary of how their dominance faded towards the end of the game. They will certainly have to play better if they are to pull off the victories against Worcester and St Johns they need to maintain their promotion push over the season’s final few weeks. Somerville have proven themselves a good football team this year; aside from their form in the league, they knocked Premier Division champions-elect Christ Church out of Cuppers, one of the competition’s biggest shocks.

For Keble, another defeat means they are still firmly in a relegation battle and desperately need to gain some points from their remaining games.

Losing is no laughing matter

Andy Murray may have lost the Australian Open final last month, and despite Australia’s attempts to mock his tears, it appears that they are in keeping with a recent trend that transcends almost every sporting arena.

Tears have forever, it seems, pervaded the theatre of world sport and characterized the careers of players and teams throughout their long histories. Who can forget Paul Gascoigne’s reaction to that yellow card in Turin, Jana Novotna at Wimbledon, or perhaps most touchingly the myth that Donald Bradman failed to pick Hollies’ googly at the Oval due to the lack of a hankerchief?

Such outbursts of emotion were initially one-offs. Forever remembered for their rarity as much as for their release of emotion and intensity. How times have changed. More and more it has become the trend to launch the team lifeboat as soon as defeat (or victory) is upon the melodramatic stars. Whether or not the RNLI has been drafted in to sit alongside the St John’s Ambulance men at international rugby fixtures is one thing, but perhaps more interesting is to find a reason as to why such a reaction to grief and relief has become increasingly acceptable of the field of professional sports.

Until the start of the 1990s, blubbing sports stars didn’t exist. If a player wanted to cry he or she would stoically leave the field of play, march to the dressing room before, only then, balling one’s eyes out into the nearest sweaty towel. ‘Gazza’ made such an impact purely because such a spontaneous outburst of emotion was unprecedented. A footballer crying? Surely not.

Yet now it is commonplace to see men and women from tennis players to footballers to golfers whimper and sniff through acceptance speeches worldwide. When Roger Federer won his second Wimbledon title he very generously contributed to Centre Court a downpour of such magnitude that, had it occurred ten minutes earlier would surely have sent the ball boys running for the covers and Cliff Richard.

Another case of overusing the lacrimal glands, under different circumstances admittedly, was when John Terry missed a penalty to win the Champions League in Moscow. He too opened the flood gates and had to be consoled by a fortunately already drenched Frank Lampard (and possibly later Mrs Wayne Bridge). This to add to the multitude of blubbers turned portable sprinklers who sit and litter the pitches with their bodies come final whistle in the knockout rounds of any international soccer tournament.

For some this is a genuine display of emotion for others it’s an unfortunate product of the players trying their utmost to ‘show commitment’ to their cause. In other words, if you don’t turn on the waterworks, then your heart was never really in it.

Football has been grateful to accept the image of the weeping hero more than any other sport. In part this is due to the number of supporters on the last day of the season who shed more than a tear when their team is relegated. A great deal of empathy is created when they see their favourites pledging allegiance to the doomed club by joining in the shared bawling. When local boy Alan Smith did exactly that at Bolton in May 2004 he was embraced by the Leeds fans a ‘class act’ and was lauded for his dedication to the cause whilst Mark Viduka, who had simply shrugged his shoulders, was lambasted as an underachieving mercenary. Some watery eyes at a convenient juncture can, nowadays, make or break a career in the eyes of the fans.

Even cricket has caught the crying bug. The Ashes of both 2005 and 2009 were fortunately bereft of tears, but not so the podium at last year’s women’s World Cup. After England had defeated New Zealand in the Final, the ‘White Ferns’ captain Haidee Tiffen fronted the post match interview visibly welling up and exited tearful. Serial sniffler Federer behaved in an almost identical manner when defeated at the Australian Open in 2009 after Rafael Nadal got the better of him. Here once again the tears were of the loser, those now ubiquitous tears that polarize audiences; either you sympathize with the defeated or laugh at their childish and public display of emotion. In the case of Federer one has seen them so often, that whether he is conqueror or conquered he is seen with a crumpled face of unbridled emotion.

Making grown men cry is something that only sport can conjure on a truly public front. The spontaneous release of emotion is something that connects the star to his fans and allows someone as masterful as Federer to finally appear human. The true tears do show the passion and desire that draws so many people to watch and enjoy sport in the first place, though the more we as an audience see such antics, the more the act is diluted by the very watery teardrops that fall. There is obviously no way that such an act can be controlled, but the day the lifeboats arrive at Twickenham is the day that surely crying has taken too great a hold on what was originally the macho world of men’s sport.

"En garde" for fencing Blues

On Saturday 13th February, in the Examination schools, the Dark Blues lined up against the Powder Blues in the 103rd Fencing Varsity Match. Earlier in the day, Oxford’s Women Blues had valiantly fallen to the Tabs, adding to the weight of expectation on the Oxford Men. Cambridge probably had to be considered favourites, being unbeaten since March 2008, but the last time these two teams had met, the Light Blues only triumphed on the final hit. Before the fencing began, the National Anthem rang out, reminding fencers and spectators alike of the importance of the occasion.

The match began with sabre, traditionally Cambridge’s strongest weapon. However, under the guidance of this year’s captain Alex Crutchett (Balliol), Oxford sabre fencing has undergone a mini-Renaissance. Competing alongside Crutchett were Mike Coombes (Exeter), Dom Kerr (Magdalen), and Oxford’s American import Matt Kolasa (Kellogg). All produced some excellent fencing, with captain Crutchett setting the standard with an opening 5-1 victory against Felix Wood. Unfortunately, however, the Oxford sabreurs also became frustrated by differences of opinion with the referee. Consequently, they failed to build on this early lead, going into the final sabre bout trailing 40-38.

In this bout, Alex Crutchett faced his elder brother, Anthony. Alex took the opportunity to give Anthony a few reasons to regret his choice of university, with some excellent hits. However, Anthony is a veteran of three previous Varsity matches, and did enough for the Cambridge sabre team to edge a 45-43 victory.

Oxford had hoped to establish a morale-boosting lead in the sabre. Instead, they went into the foil 2 hits down. Cambridge won the foil relatively easily in both the BUCS league matches this season, and so a special performance was needed from the Oxford foil team. In particular, hopes centred on top Dark Blue foilist, Mat ‘Ginger Ninja’ Shearman (Lincoln). Shearman did not disappoint, with his performances involving a lot of fist pumping and shouting. He upset the Tabs’ mentality with his exuberance, aided by some deftly executed attacks.

Alongside Shearman, the old man of the team, Matt Baker (Exeter) was also fencing foil. An epeeist by trade, he had been humiliated 9-2 by Cambridge’s Dan Summerbell earlier in the season. However, he was determined not to let Cambridge’s abrasive foil leader get the better of him again. Wearing a foil jacket from days when Baker was undoubtedly slimmer, he managed to manoeuvre around Summerbell and the other Tab foilists, and bemused them by scoring some fine hits. The hard work of the fight – and celebrating the hits he was scoring – left Baker dizzy and in need of an extended breather.

Oxford had also planned to use American sabreur Matt Kolasa in the foil. However, Oxford captain Alex Crutchett substituted himself, unable to face being idle during a Tab-bashing. He showed he had the talent to match his bravado. The speed of his footwork and bladework rattled the Cambridge foil team, and led to some important points being scored.

Despite these heroic efforts, the Oxford foilists still fell behind to a well-drilled Cambridge team. Nevertheless, the 45-33 scoreline was far tighter than the Tabs would have expected, and gave a glimmer of hope to the Oxford team.

The final weapon, epee, is notoriously hard to chase hits in. Many Dark Blues’ supporters felt that victory was beyond Oxford’s grasp, as they needed to win by 15 points. But the naysayers had not counted on the determination of the Oxford epeeists. In particular, they were unprepared for the magnificent performance of Luxembourger Phil Birget (St Peters). In what could well be Luxembourg’s greatest ever military success, Birget butchered the Tabs with no mercy.

Opening the epee was Matt Baker, back to fencing his weapon of choice. Baker was 1-0 up before he even fenced, as Cambridge received a red card for faulty equipment. Baker then got the crowd pumped, beating his French opponent Valentin Dalibard 5-2. Next to step up for the Dark Blues was the towering 2 metre figure of Nick Wareham (Univ). Wareham fenced sensibly to hold Phil West to 4-4. The Tabs then received another red card for further faulty equipment, before Birget the Butcher destroyed his first opponent Gasparetti 5-0, leaving the score at 15-6.

Inside the Dark Blue camp there was a feeling that something special might be about to happen. Oxford had planned to use Rupert Paines (Regent’s Park) for Wareham’s remaining epee bouts. But, inspired by Wareham’s performance in the first bout, and aware that the Cambridge’s Dalibard struggled with fencing left-handers, Paines suggested Wareham stay on for the next fight. Baker agreed with this admirable display of humility, and backed Wareham to fight again. Wareham went on to fence a solid bout against Dalibard, winning 5-4. Baker then returned to fence Anthony Crutchett and put the crowd to sleep with a 2-1 victory leaving the score at 22-11.

While the crowd might have been uncertain at what was going on, Oxford’s strategic plan was taking shape. The masterpiece was unveiled when Birget ‘the Butcher’ returned to the piste. He carved strips off the Tab hulk at will, attacking quickly and with determination. He was jumping for joy, indicating to the crowd where he had hit his opponent.

When Birget had sated his appetite, Paines came on to fence Anthony Crutchett. Never has a 0-0 draw been executed with such control, patience, and overall skill. It is not easy to hold a fencer off, and Paines did so with inspiring calm. A devastating airhorn blast from Baker let the Cambridge team know that holding Crutchett to nothing was a victory for the Oxford team. Why? Because Birget the Butcher had one last fight. Given space to score even more points, Birget went in and destroyed the Tabs’ last hope, Dalibard. As the noise from the crowd increased in intensity, the Butcher revelled in the massacre. Every hit made an Oxford victory seem more and more inevitable.

The final bout saw Baker lining up against Phil West. The crowd seemed confident in Baker’s ability, possibly remembering how he had clawed back 6 hits for victory two years ago. However, he himself was less certain, being all too aware of his faltering ability to focus. Still, as chants of “BAKER! BAKER! BAKER!” filled the Examination Schools, Baker began to sense the abject terror that was filling his opponent, and knew victory was in sight. He held it together and wrapped up a 45-25 epee victory. Oxford had won the Varsity Match again, and the deafening roar of a packed Exam Schools sent the Tabs on their way. They had learnt to their cost that, to Dark Blue fencers, the Examination Schools is hallowed ground.

Alco on call for 24-hour drinking

A new home delivery service, offering alcohol, cigarettes and condoms is set to begin trading, despite Police fears that the business will encourage irresponsible drinking.

‘Alco-Call’ was granted a twenty-four hour alcohol licence on 16th February and is now preparing to begin its service delivering a range of wines, alco-pops and mixers, to customers’ homes, seven nights a week.

As an element of the licensing agreement the company accepted a 16-point list of conditions recommended by police, including a Think 30 clause, which dictates that the company must ask for identification from anyone who looks under 30 years.

Yet police remain concerned at the potential effects of the business, which will operate between 10pm and 4am on weekdays and from 10pm to 5.30am at weekends.

Tony Cope, the Thames Valley Police licensing officer for Oxfordshire, commented: “the big worry is that this alcohol service may fuel further drunkenness, because it’s likely to be serving people who are already heavily under the influence once they’ve left a pub or club.”

Student feeling regarding the company is mixed. Although much hype surrounds Alco-Call, which already has over 4,000 members on its Facebook group, some are critical of the service.

A second-year student from Somerville argued that the company was “a bad idea”.

They added, “Students will use the service when they are already drunk in the middle of the night and are therefore more likely to spend a stupid amount on more alcohol.”

Others observed that the company could pose a threat to vulnerable drinkers. A fourth-year physics student stated: “their claim that they urge you to drink responsibly clashes with some questionable wording on the website like ‘so you don’t ever have to go thirsty!”.

Yet many suggested that the company was unlikely to impact upon their drinking habits at all and few were concerned that a new ‘post-lash’ culture was set to emerge.

Second-year history student Helena Powell argued: “I can see why the police and locals would be concerned, but I don’t think it’ll have a huge effect on how drunk people get.

“Drinks are pretty expensive in Oxford and most people ‘pre-lash’ before a night out anyway because of the fact that it’s cheaper.

“Obviously the 10% discount will attract students more than anyone else, but the prices are definitely premium, which will put off casual drinkers.”
Many suggested that prices were enough to prevent the service from having a dramatic impact on student drinking.

An Alco-Call price list advertises a 24-pack of lager for between £25 and £28, while a litre bottle of gin or vodka is £25. Customers must spend a minimum of £15 for free home delivery.

A spokesperson for Oxford University responded to the arrival of Alco-Call by stating: “The University expects students to behave responsibly; to avoid bringing the University into disrepute; and to avoid causing a nuisance to the local community.”

 

Saucy Somerville demands striptease

Somerville JCR got more than they bargained for at last Sunday’s meeting, as JCR President John McElroy was mandated to perform a striptease.

Birthday boy McElroy was ordered to perform a strip tease whilst singing a song, “preferably Abba”, in an emergency motion proposed by David Sankey and Stavros Orfanos.
The motion was amended, stating that McElroy only had to strip to his boxers. The altered motion passed with only two objections, though McElroy challenged the mandate as his name had been misspelled.

He said, “I thought I may have found a loophole when I discovered that my name had been spelt wrong in the first clause, but this was hastily corrected in an amendment – I was flattered by the tenacity of certain supporters of the motion.”

At the end of the meeting, McElroy began his striptease though the meeting was closed by JCR chair Philip Sellar before he was able to complete the dance.
McElroy said the striptease had been “thankfully brief and relatively modest.”

He told Cherwell, “Stripping is not an activity in which I engage with any regularity, and my dancing is questionable at the best of times. Personally, not falling over was an achievement in itself…
“I’m glad my birthday was able to provide the opportunity for something a little less serious.”

Somerville JCR VP Iain Moss said, “At the end of the meeting the Chair asked him to begin his striptease. John, feigning tears, got as far as removing his tie and running it under his crotch before the vast majority of the 30-odd audience felt awkward and uncomfortable and elected to leave instead of being witness to this potential visual abuse.

“Some however remained, myself included, and were definitely left wanting more…He was not forced any further than was decent, but those of us wanting a bit of indecency to lighten up JCR meetings (which had been heated of late), were disappointed.”

McElroy’s girlfriend Ashleigh Grant said, “I have previously witnessed the presidential dancing, and in all honesty I was more worried about the effect this would have on the mental wellbeing of those watching, than the nudity itself. John has a fine pair of legs and I think that it was for this reason, rather than any other, that the motion was met with such enthusiasm.”

She further commented, “As his girlfriend I cannot condone this practice, though as a member of Somerville JCR I fully support the inclusion of stripteases at the end of meetings, for the look of utter mortification alone.”

One Somerville student who wished to remain anonymous, said, “Having never attended JCR meetings previously it was something of a shock to encounter the levels of depravity that were treated as merely a legislative procedure. John is a good friend of mine, and in any other context he – I once believed – would not have endorsed such debauched activities.

“The JCR treated this as customary, but I was personally offended when John used the very tie that I had bought him as a birthday present in such a lewd and sexual manner.”
McElroy said, “It remains to be seen what effect my ‘dance’ will have on attendance at future meetings.”

 

Photo Blog: Magic Seven

Fancy yourself as a photographer?

Want your photographs from around and about Oxford seen by the thousands of people who visit the Cherwell website every day?

If so, why not send a few of your snaps into [email protected]?

 

 

Friday: Cherwell Photo – Rachel Chew

 

Thursday: Magdalen tower at night – Jessica Goodman

 

Wednesday: Nibbles at OFW Launch Party at The Living Room – Ollie Ford

 

Tuesday: Imps – Ursa Mali

 

Monday: Defence – Wojtek Szymczak

 

Sunday: Indian Society at Saturday’s International Fesitval – Jin Lee

 

Saturday: Dreaming Spires – Wojtek Szymczak

Interview with Stephen Garrett

The executive producer behind Spooks, Life on Mars and Hustle talks to Matt Parvin about the future of broadcasting, British TV and how it feels to be back in Oxford.

How to Cook… Really Easy Roast Chicken

 

Marc Kidson shows you how to cook a roast dinner that will save you slaving over a hot stove.

Recipe Re-cap:

Student-friendly Sunday Roast, for two.

– Two chicken legs
– Two lemons
– Two red onions
– 8 garlic cloves
– Fresh rosemary
– Olive oil, salt, black pepper

For the Potato Wedges:
– Two large baking potatoes
– Olive oil, salt, black pepper
– Other seasoning: e.g. paprika, dried rosemary, dried thyme

1. Cut the lemons and red onions into quarters, add to a large roasting tin.
2. Peel 8 cloves of garlic (or to taste) and add to tin.
3. Season both sides of the chicken with black pepper and salt, place in tin.
4. Scatter over fresh rosemary, then drizzle generously with olive oil, more salt and pepper, and mix to coat all ingredients.
5. Place in oven, preheated to 180C/Gas Mark 4 on top shelf.
6. Cut the potatoes into wedges (see video tip), and place into oven-proof dish.
7. Drizzle with olive oil, season well with salt and black pepper, then add pinches of paprika, rosemary, and thyme (if using).
8. Mix to coat all the wedges with seasoning, place below chicken in the oven.
9. Cook for 40 minutes once wedges are in, tossing ingredients of both pans halfway and switching positions if the wedges are cooking too slowly.
10. Remove from oven once chicken is nicely brown and the wedges are cooked through.
11. Finally, serve with vegetable of choice, spooning over pan juices for extra flavour.

Analysis: violence

Fifth Week Blues seem to of have presented themselves with unusual virulence if this week’s Cherwell is anything to go on.

Oxford students have always been notably close to the edges of ‘functional’, so it’s debatable whether this apparent slide into criminal behaviour is really any surprise at all. Indeed, it is perhaps to be expected; perhaps the Oxford bubble is experiencing Britain’s famous social decay, but just a few decades late. Oxford lags behind other UK universities in terms of the prevalence of violent incidents. This could mean a number of things, not least that on the odd occasion when there is an interesting news week, we might horribly overreact.

And to get seriously worried – or at least, getting het up about spiralling violence – does seem to be a bit of an overreaction. I agree wholeheartedly that night time attacks are a problem, but the more customary Oxonian behavioural issues on the other hand… throwing food and a little mix up with some fish? This week’s behaviour isn’t violent so much as childish.

What should be concerning us, then, is that as a body of young adults we are incapable of acting any better than our little siblings. I’m tentative to suggest that I’d rather we had real incidents, but it would be nice to grow up a little bit.

Of course, trashing rooms is not a victimless crime. Someone has to pay for the damage to both the property and to the university’s good name. That said, a spot of room trashing is hardly a recent development for Oxford. That it is no longer the preserve of the super-rich (and super-obnoxious) is perhaps a sign that the social side of Oxford is finally democratising a little bit and isn’t this what we all want?

Despite how it may seem, for the most part we know how to behave. It’s true that when we get together in groups and have a drink or two we sometimes let this lapse a little bit. However, far more important than what goes on is the spirit in which it’s undertaken. Throwing something at a porter is an undeniably odious action and no doubt merits a little punishment and a thorough apology (although I suppose he already sent a nice bottle).

A lack of foresight with a silly prank has unpleasant consequences – particularly if you’re a fish – but is a product of just that, a lack of thought, rather than a more severe behavioural problem. The lesson we have to learn from this week is to think before we do, and sooner rather than later, before the consequences do become more serious.