Thursday 18th September 2025
Blog Page 1961

The Social Network

0

While working on The Crimson, Harvard’s student newspaper, I heard someone talking about a sophomore named Mark Zuckerberg who had been summoned before Harvard’s ‘Ad Board,’ the university’s disciplinary body, to face accusations of breaching security, violating copyrights and infringing individual privacy.

Days earlier, Zuckerberg had hacked into the student photo directories of nine of Harvard’s twelve Houses (Harvard’s equivalent to the Oxbridge colleges) and used the information to create a website called Facemash.com, a take-off on a popular webpage called ‘Hot or Not?’ which enabled users to compare the attractiveness of two randomly selected students. In less than a day, the number of hits on the site quadrupled to give a total of 22,000, but Zuckerberg was forced to take the site down in response to outrage expressed by certain students and university administrators.

The Ad Board had already forced two friends of mine to leave Harvard. Zuckerberg was not so unlucky, and in spite of violating Harvard copyright and infringing on student privacy, he was let off with a warning.

Following the publicity that he gained from Facemash, three seniors approached Zuckerberg to see if he would do the coding for a social networking site for Harvard students that they had been working on, called Harvard Connection. Two of the seniors, Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss, were Olympic-level rowers from Greenwich, CT and members of the Porcellian, Harvard’s most secretive and exclusive finals club.

The third, Divya Narendra, was a former tennis teammate of mine from our high school in Queens, NY. From our perspective as high school students, Harvard seemed to possess an unattainable mystique. Upon arriving, that mystique disappeared, and was replaced by an anxious need to stay relevant among peers who were, in one way or another, going to run the world. I reacted to this pressure by attempting to ignore it, while Divya shed his wardrobe for Brooks Brothers, J Press and hopes of making a name for himself on Wall Street.

Zuckerberg agreed informally to take the job, but soon after decided to build a site of his own and stopped returning calls from Divya and the Winklevosses. A few months later, in early February, Zuckerberg launched the thefacebook.com, a site based on the popular social networking site Friendster that anyone with a Harvard e-mail address could join.

By the end of the month, the site grew to include a number of other Ivy League schools, and now, six years later, counts one in every fourteen people on the planet as a member. Zuckerberg is history’s youngest self-made billionaire, and the Winklevosses (who were at Christ Church last year doing an MBA) and Divya have, since the beginning, been litigating against Zuckerberg in an attempt to claim a piece of the spoils.

In November 2006, during a trip back to Cambridge for the Harvard-Yale game, I ran into Divya at a party at the Spee, one of Harvard’s finals clubs. This was a time when much of the Harvard community viewed Zuckerberg as a legend. It was shortly after a feature article in the New Yorker had come out which recounted the origins of Facebook, including his lawsuit against Zuckerberg. We reminisced about people we knew in common, and he seemed happy to be talking about something other than the lawsuit.

A couple of years ago, Facebook agreed to a $65 million settlement with the Winklevosses and Divya. It’s not clear, though, how much of that the three actually pocketed after legal fees, taxes, and an alleged overvaluation of the stock component of the initial settlement. Not enough, apparently, since the three have gone back to the courtroom.
To guess from Divya’s Facebook profile (it seems that even he, and now the twins as well, could not forego what has become the necessity of having one), things are going better than they were back in 2006. He is featured as a minor but significant character in The Social Network, and has even posted pictures from the movie’s premier at the New York Harvard Club.

When I go to watch The Social Network on Friday, I expect that there will be something surreal about seeing the Harvard of my undergraduate experience recreated as the backdrop to a contest amongst America’s young “power elite.” And if I experience any emotional reaction to the film at all, it will be with uneasy pangs of something that can’t quite be called nostalgia.

Review: Come Around Sundown

0

The first track on Kings Of Leon’s new album is called ‘The End’. If the band named it as such to indicate a rejection of their last album’s highly polished sound, it’s a misnomer. KOL certainly go for a scrappier aesthetic in ‘Come Around Sundown’; their laughter at the end of ‘Back Down South’ evokes the image of an impromptu gig in front of a gaggle of rough rednecks, somewhere in a smoky bar in the band’s native Tennessee. The song’s faux-spontaneity is almost convincing, but then it ends and you’re left to ponder that mysterious laughter at its close.

This roughness, however, is just a symptom of nasty growing pains; all in all, KOL are handling success well. This is no Youth And Young Manhood; but better a band that evolves than one stuck in the mire of its former glory.

The band retain their signature sound in ‘Radioactive’: Caleb’s faintly hoarse whine, the soaring guitar line and the incessant drumming are all present and correct. ‘Pony Up’, with its optimistic melodies and play-in-the-sand beach vibe, is almost fun. And in songs like ‘The Face’, KOL work their magic, albeit of a less frenetic, less rockabilly kind: with its combination of beautiful lyricism and haunting melody, the song is reminiscent of ‘Milk’. This album may sound better in an arena than in a basement, but KOL still manage to excite in a way that only they can.

The privileges of being a Villager

0

It’s just gone four o’clock on Wednesday afternoon when I walk into the O2 Academy’s kitchenette for a chat with Conor O’Brien. He sits up from his stretched-out repose on a small leather sofa, slips a hand under a purple beanie to rub at his hat-hair, and places a half-chewed piece of gum politely on the table. He’s tired. The band that he fronts, Villagers, have travelled up to Oxford after selling out the London Scala the night before – ‘a heavy night,’ he admits.

The last year has seen Villagers’ stock rise rapidly. The band enjoyed near-universal acclaim for their Mercury Prize-nominated first LP, Becoming A Jackal, and have been touring the world ever since its release. O’Brien talks of the nomination with endearing modesty: ‘It was…cool. I never know what to say to things like that. It was an honour, I guess, and I felt surprised – I wasn’t expecting it.’ He confesses he felt ‘awkward’ during the ceremony, performing his token song before leaving – perhaps unsurprisingly – empty-handed.
‘I was proud of it,’ he says of the album. ‘I thought it was good when I finished it. I wasn’t doing it for expectations or critical reactions or anything. I imagined the reactions of people standing in front of me when I was singing, and I was imagining a reciprocal thing between the audience and the band’. When the band perform, O’Brien’s youthful Irish twang and mesmerising narratives generate a glass-like aura that commands silence from the audience; to shatter it would be sacrilegious. He has a penchant for carving whole songs out of routine, everyday material (a bus breaking down, a car ride home) – for writing ‘like a child’, as he puts it. Is it really so easy for him to find inspiration? ‘I like things that explore the little universes inside each person as they’re doing the dishes or whatever. It’s the unsaid conversations that don’t really happen… a song is something that says that, you know?’.

As for influences, O’Brien places great emphasis on Hermann Hesse’s ‘Narcissus And Goldmund’: ‘I was kind of copying it [on Becoming A Jackal]. I wanted to make an album version of that book. That was the main influence in terms of themes.’ Among musicians, he cites Neil Young, Randy Newman, and even Nina Simone – whose raconteur style he evokes on ‘To Be Counted Among Men’, so as to give credibility to the ‘rather preposterous lyrics.’

The band’s evening performance is exceptional in every way; but O’Brien’s solo recitals are what really puts me under a spell. A fully acoustic rendition of ‘Ship Of Promises’ sounds better
than the original, if not as tempestuous. ‘Twenty-Seven Strangers’ holds every listener in rapt attention throughout its duration,
while two brand new songs – ‘Memoirs’ and the haunting, odyssean ‘Cecilia’ – indicate the direction in which O’Brien’s songwriting talent is rapidly progressing.

But despite my prompting, he’s loath to talk about a new album just yet. ‘We’re probably touring through till April, but I might take January off to write’, he says shyly. A pause, then: ‘I’m
just writing the whole time, whatever happens. I’ll probably feel, at some stage, like getting it recorded, but I don’t feel like it right now.’

In the Closet

0

In the Fresher’s Guide to Oxford Fashion, we noted how easy it is for a man to look almost unbearably handsome in formal dress. The elegance of the uniform carries its own weight, distributing its benefits without regard to status, manners or aplomb, and is the reason why every sartorialist aspires to champagne socialism. While the egalitarian effects of satin lapels and pleated shirt fronts are undeniable, so too the challenge of standing apart from a well-dressed crowd.

For most of the events around Oxford where formal dress may be expected – college balls, formal dinners, early morning tutorials – expectations are such that there is room to experiment. Be daring with your neckware, for example, by substituting a pocket handkerchief for a bow tie, knotted once around the neck (not the collar) and turned slightly askance. (Favour a regal colour scheme – black, silver, burgundy or purple – to maintain a semblance of propriety.) In cooler months, try a velvet dinner jacket in some adventurous colour, such as green or burgundy, and wear it also on less-formal occasions, helping you look rakish yet dishevelled on your way to the gymnasium, the boathouse, or wherever else you might be inclined to pull as hard as you can.

The thing to watch for, as ever, is stepping too far out of line, and mistaking camp for creativity, looking worse for looking different, yesterday’s junk for something more than this. The line is elusive, but it is enough to avoid the most egregious offences, which repeat themselves with dispiriting regularity: the powder blue le smoking (with or without frilled shirt front); the patterned cummerbund (with or without matching bow tie); various forms of athletic footwear (with or without ironical intent). The best defence is to remain thoughtful before the closet (perhaps some Kipling with your pre-prandial, ‘Keep your head when all about you / are losing theirs…’), and regardless of the outcome, act as if you couldn’t look more dapper.

The accessories trend report

0

I just googled the word shoe: an item of footwear intended to protect and comfort the human foot. Wikipedia, I beg to differ. I love skyscraper heels, but I can say with absolute authority that they do not protect or comfort anything. This season, however, practicality is key: kitten heels, brogues, shoe boots and chunky heels are officially* in. Mannish shoes are the order of the season in autumnal browns and caramels, a welcomed antidote to summer’s flowers and frou-frou. The reinvention of the gentleman’s slipper is right up my street. My favourites are Tom Ford’s mocha velvet pair, but if you don’t have a spare three grand, Office have a lovely version for £62. If I was the Old Woman I would live in THIS shoe and for those still in the 90s, Dr Martens are back with a bang.

*According to Cherwell

Mary Renton

This season the “it” bag is a thing of the past – fashion has decided to give our bank accounts and our nerves a break and introduce a new generation of bags: good quality and classic styles that rise above the “in and out” fashion trends. The frame bag is essential to every girl’s wardrobe – its classic, structured shape and leather in mute colours means it will never outdate. For those of you who like their accessories slightly more extravagant, this season’s key textures and patterns – fur, sequins, leopard print, crocodile skin – have all found their way onto our purses. Don’t be afraid to go all out with these statement bags: go for bright colours, sparkles and over-the-top luxe. Remember, the key look this season is classy, so keep your overall outfit subtle – you are aiming for understated elegance.

Anahit Behrooz

Often overlooked, tights, socks and stockings are a must for winter accessorizing Opaque lighter shades can uplift your outfit and add a more delicate, feminine feel. Spice up the monotony of drab dark colours by opting for white or off-white tights. These can brighten up and contrast with darker colours or blend in with a softer and lighter palette. If you are in need of something more substantial against the worst of British weather, try thick woolen tights. Feeling apprehensive about the textures trend? These are perfect for your literal and metaphorical cold feet. If you fancy getting a bit more leg on show, ankle socks with heels were all over the catwalks this season. Although ‘socks with sandals’ are usually synonymous with fashion faux pas, with heel heights diminished to more sensible proportions, socks join the ranks of the practical yet stylish .

Laura Butterfield

Creaming Spires

0

Oh isn’t it nice living back in college? I really feel institutionalisation does wonders for the old sex life. When you have to traipse all the way back to Cowley at the end of a night it’s hard to summon up the energy, even for a cheeky blozzer (it ain’t called a job for nothing), but stumbling back to one’s room, mere metres away, well – I’ll deepthroat with the best of them. And a cheeky bit of rimming in between lashings of French surrealism is a far more invigorating essay break than a lonely cigarette outside your minging house down Cowley road.

Freshers – make the most of it now, before you have to move out in second year; the walk of shame is rendered far less painful when it’s only done across a quad, rather than my unfortunate friend’s sexperience last year –he found himself cycling home the morning after Queerbop dressed in a skin tight swan costume with more than a discreet amount of testicle on show. Thank God he was in Oxford. I think you could get lynched for less than that in my home town. But will you make the most of it, Freshers? I was decidedly disappointed by the lack of promiscuity in my first week in Oxford.

Apart from the homosexuals, who were busy interpenetrating quicker than pubic lice, the hetero love-in was… luke-warm. I think someone groped my tit at Park End but that might have been an accident. Which is, frankly, irritating because I wasn’t sitting through all those gap-year stories for my health, I thought I’d at least get a cheeky fumble out of it. But, niente. Rien.

And freshers – don’t worry about getting the reputation for being a schlag, at least people will know who you are, and hopefully won’t confuse you with that other Biochemist who also spent six months in Cambodyah. Plus, if you’re constantly getting naked it’ll be another reason not to pile on the Fresher’s Ten – a muffin top is not a great way of accessorising sub fusc. Think missionary, rather than The Mission. Think creaming your pants, rather than Café Creme. I’m not advocating sex over food, you understand, I’m just suggesting there’s a lot more to discover in Oxford other than the beautiful architecture, mind-blowing academic prowess, endless baguette shops and ignorant rich people. Like, you know, threesomes. The U, A and G spots. Oh, but do discover the Ann Summers in the Clarendon centre before groping about for the latter, by the way, or at least make sure your nails are pared down and cleaned first.

Carry on Jimmy

0

‘I’m pretty free to do what I want right now – I’m essentially a child’. Jimmy Carr doesn’t mince his words, which is to be expected from a comedian who has built his career on word play and one-liners. Needless to say, yours truly was appropriately flustered when the phone rang, and made clumsy small talk about uni before remembering to turn on the dictaphone and ask some of the pre-prepared questions. I needn’t have worried; the comedy giant turned out to be affable and eager to chat, in contrast to the expectations created by his dry and often condescending on–screen demeanour.

His rise to fame throughout the Noughties is certainly no laughing matter (sorry, I couldn’t resist). Having quit his job in marketing at Shell at the turn of the century, within two years he had been nominated for the Perrier Comedy Award, and the work in television quickly followed. Early work in Your Face or Mine (‘Wow, that’s going back a bit – how old were you when that first came out?’ – I was 12) was followed by Distraction, of which there were both domestic and American versions.
‘We didn’t do that for long but it’s nice to be remembered. It didn’t get boring – we did a couple of series then left it.’ His longest running show, 8 out of 10 cats, currently in its tenth season, cemented his reputation as hot televisual property, both as a host and as a panellist, and he has since gone on to guest appearances on QI, Buzzcocks, and Have I Got News For You, where he infamously flirted with guest host Ann Widdecombe, who branded his wit ‘a barrage of filth’ and vowed never to return to the show.

‘I’ve been very lucky with Channel 4,’ Jimmy explains, ‘The shows that I do [are] the kind of TV that I would watch.’ Would he ever consider writing a sitcom, as fellow stand ups Jack Dee and Sean Lock have done? ‘I love Lead Balloon (Jack Dee’s sitcom) – I think it’s amazing. I suppose there is that temptation. A lot of friends of mine write sitcoms, and I wouldn’t want to be in competition with them. The guys who write The Inbetweeners (Ian Morris and Damon Beesley) produce my DVD and I just think, mine isn’t going to be as good as that, so I might as well leave it.’

As a stand up, Carr is relentless – with over 220 gigs a year he is on tour for months on end. ‘It’s weird because it sounds like a lot, but I only do 2 hours work a day so I suppose I’m like a PPE student really, I do 2 hours a day, every day – that’s enough, isn’t it? I’m sure psychology students can relate to that.’ At this point the interview degenerated into a conversation about the subjects that have replaced Land Economy as the subject of choice for an easy time at Oxbridge, with a rather predictable outcome. Here’s a hint: it rhymes with Shmography.

With an rapid-fire repartee of deadpan jokes that frequently juxtapose elegant word play with crude or taboo topics, it would be easy to accuse Carr of exploiting the shock value of his material, but he is adamant that critics have got the wrong end of the stick, ‘It’s weird you would put it like that, because to me it’s never been about wanting to shock or push your buttons – it really is my sense of humour. What really gets me, the gut punch, the really visceral response, tends to be the darker stuff, whether it’s about taboo subjects or sexual things; anything kind of transgressive I find funny. If the idea was to shock, you could say more shocking things – a lot of it is purely word play.’

As a jokes-based comedian, Carr is part of a relatively small crowd at a time where the prevalent styles are observational comedy, and what he calls character based comedy – not elaborate, Al Murray style guises, you understand, but playing on the characteristics of the comedian as a person. And despite his popularity and success, Carr is just one of a number of familiar faces on the scene these days, with the profession having undergone a recent explosion of public popularity.

‘I do think there’s a certain sense to which people say it’s the new rock and roll – there’s quite a lot of choice out there now, which there really wasn’t five, ten years ago. People go out and have a great night, and then say, I’d quite like to go out, and do that again, and laugh with other people. It’s such a different experience from say, seeing a movie, it’s so interactive – everyone laughs in the room. It’s a real shared experience, and I think there’s something, and not to be too pseudo-intellectual, but I think there’s kind of a cultural shared experience, that I think people crave.’

If comedy’s the new rock and roll, then contenders for the roles of Jimmy Page and Angus Young must certainly be Ricky Gervais and Russell Brand, with the Office star having smashed the US scene with writing, directing and acting credits, and Brand well on his way to a solid role in the Judd Squad troupe that includes Will Ferrell, Paul Rudd and Jonah Hill. However, their success has been met with criticism that they’ve sold out, watering down their humour for the mass market of Hollywood. Not that these voices cut much ice with Jimmy, ‘Really? Really? Who criticised them?? What kind of a fuck-knuckle would go, yeah, they’ve gone to Hollywood, they’re not keeping it real. Fucking more power to them.’ Does he foresee a shift to the American market for himself? ‘I’ve done stuff in America, which was very fun, but I don’t think they need more stand ups over there. Life is pretty good here – the grass is always greener I suppose, but life is pretty sweet man.’

JIMMY CARR – LAUGHTER THERAPY

Oxford New Theatre

Sunday 21 November @ 8pm

Tickets: 0844 847 1585 OR www.newtheatreoxford.org.uk

‘Wannabe a journalist? Then blog’

0

Wannabe Hacks is part journalism blog, part pseudo-scientific experiment. The five young men at the heart of it (of which I am one) are the equivalent of laboratory mice, undergoing intense testing in the hope of discovering an answer to a question as unfathomable as a cure for cancer: “What is the best way of getting a job in the media?'”
As any good experiment, Wannabe Hacks has one important variable– the means by which the five wannabe hacks take to crowbar themselves into an already over-subscribed profession. To that end, each writes under a different alias. The Intern, or Nick Petrie to his friends, decided against formal journalism training and opted instead to graze the fields of journalism internships in the hope of securing of job. The Student, yours truly, is a postgraduate student at the prestigious City University London where I am studying an MA in Newspaper Journalism. The Freelancer is Matthew Caines, who, since graduating in 2009, has worked independently and written for numerous national publications. The Detective, aka Ned Murray, is doing an MA in Investigative Journalism, hoping to prove that there is more to postgraduate journalism study than news. And finally we have The Chancer, Tom Clarke, another MA student at City, who left everything to the last minute. As all of the quintet are recent graduates from a Redbrick, Wannabe Hacks is what your secondary school science teacher would call a ‘fair test’. The question is: whose path will yield the skills and qualities to get them a job as a journalist first.

Wannabe Hacks came into being because the five of us got bored of being fed ‘industry advice’ by journalists who 1) already had jobs and 2) whose experiences co-existed with the use of the metal printing press. We discovered little content actually came from wannabe journos trying to get their foot in the door. So we set up Wannabe Hacks to narrate our exciting but often daunting journey and to help other potential journalists along the way.

Although the site has only been up and running a smidgen under two months, so much has been learnt already, in particular what it means to run with an idea. For weeks before Wannabe Hacks went live, we struggled with nailing down how often we would blog and what we would blog about. We had a vision for what the site looked like. But with no financial backing, we resorted to pestering people on Twitter, hoping to find a kind soul to magic us up a website for free. It wasn’t until The Guardian’s Martin Belam told us to “get started. Tomorrow”, that we realised a pretty homepage wouldn’t guarantee us any hits.
On that advice, we joined the merry band of blogs on WordPress. Faster than you could say ‘graduates poised for more media job woes’, we were up and running. In the meantime a young web designer agreed to make us a custom homepage for nothing and we scraped together £30 for web hosting for the future. An arduous task then but Wannabe Hacks is slowly resembling the space for debate on journalism that we envisaged.

Our advice for young journalists, however far you are down the rocky road to hackdom, is be prepared to fail. We were well aware before we started that Wannabe Hacks might not take off, and that we may have to drop it and move onto to something else. We still may do. But- and this is key- there is always that something else, another avenue to try your luck. You don’t need to know the editor of a national but you do need to be unwavering in your commitment to becoming a hack.

5 minute tute: Spending cuts

0

How will Oxford be affected by the cuts?

Given the high proportion of Oxford people employed in the public sector (education, health-care and other services), Oxford is likely to be hit hard. But we will be hit as service-users as well as workers. Oxfordshire NHS is set to cut at least 1,900 jobs in the next few years. The County Council has to find deep cuts in spending on education and social care services. It has already lifted the cap on charging the elderly and disabled for social care. A possible indication of the kind of thing to come is the closure over the summer of a centre for the homeless, the Gap in Park End Street, as the City Council, County Council and NHS withdrew funds.

How will they affect people on low incomes?

Very badly. A study by Howard Reed and Tim Horton estimates that cuts in public services on the scale proposed in the 2010 Emergency Budget will add up to the equivalent of a more than 20% cut in real income for those in the poorest 10% as compared with a less than 2% cut for the richest 10%. The Institute for Fiscal Studies has shown that the new reforms to tax and cash benefits announced in this Budget hit the poorer harder, as a proportion of income, than the better off. These measures hit the poorest, for example, by changing the rules on the indexation of benefits and putting a cap on Housing Benefit.

Is the north of of England losing out?

The Reed-Horton study also did an analysis of the regional impact (within England) of the cuts in public services spending announced in June 2010. It estimated that, relative to income, the cuts in public services will hit the North and the Midlands hardest (though London is likely to be hardest hit in absolute terms). This study only focuses on cuts to public services, moreover, and doesn’t factor in the cuts to cash benefits. I suspect that doing so would accentuate the regional disparity we see rather than reduce it.

Should we have ring-fenced the NHS, or will this simply exacerbate problems elsewhere?

With respect, this is the wrong question. The key question is why the government thinks we should cut the deficit mainly through spending cuts and not through extra tax. The fairest way of sharing the load of paying off the deficit (‘we’re all in it together’) is through the tax system, because one readily calibrate the tax so that the better off carry a proportionately heavier load. By contrast, putting the emphasis on spending cuts almost inevitably shifts the burden onto the more vulnerable in society.

The week that was: Cash for Cashmore

0

What happened

Oh, you know the drill. Boy meets girl. Boy marries girl. Boy becomes Principal of Brasenose. Boy and girl use College expenses money in what, it is alleged, were unauthorised expenditures. It’s an expenses scandal of the classic kind. Principal Roger Cashmore and his wife went to Greece, North America and Pakistan. All the while, the story goes, they were charging BNC fee-payers for upgraded Business Class travel. In one case, according to a Brasenose report, ‘authorisation was expressly denied but the trip went ahead regardless’. Cashmore obviously denies this. He claims that he was not not granted authorisation, if you get my drift. This wily donnish manouevring didn’t work: the governors of Brasenose appear to have sacked Prof. Cashmore in an attempt to restore their credibility. That’s not the line. The line is he’s gone on research leave. It’s research leave which involves taking up two salaried positions, but they don’t want me to tell you that.

What the papers said

It’s a Cherwell exclusive, whoopee! And because we’re Oxford journos we get to write the story for the nationals as well. And by the nationals I mean the Telegraph. As ever it was the Oxford angle that sold it rather than anything else. Anyway Cashmore was hardly hounded out by the press- it was merely that an internal memo was leaked. Not so exciting. In truth it was a non-ish story, with the intense drama of a geeky Father Christmas lookalike sitting in aeroplane seats a few inches wider than normal- which, let’s face it, is what happened.

What now?

Name-living-up-to continues apace: Cashmore has just been appointed chairman of the Atomic Energy Authority at twenty-five grand for two days’ work a month. He’s also our new chairman of the Nuclear Research Advisory Council- £315 a day to you, guv’nor. Fee-payers and donors haven’t seen their money wasted this badly since, er, it was used to subsidise the administration of Brasenose expenses. Given that Oxford is a public body (in the same way the NKVD was a public body) you’d think there’d be some kind of uproar about this. Clearly there are more important scandals. Still, let’s look on the bright side. Brasenose, like the property developers they effectively are, will be looking for a new Principal. In immortal Porterhouse style the academic wranglings will be amusing to watch. But what of the money? Lost, I fear, in the bank accounts of British Airways. For the donors and fee-payers of Brasenose, it’s a pretty crap situation. They get nothing. He still wins.