Friday, April 25, 2025
Blog Page 2

The lost art of the intermission, and why the film industry needs to bring it back 

0

Last month, Brady Corbet’s The Brutalist was one of the most-discussed films at the Oscars, with its award-winning cinematography, score, and direction rightfully generating great critical acclaim. Equally, though, another feature of the movie has also sparked much discussion: the decision to split the film into two halves, separated by an intermission.  

It’s a rare feature for a modern movie, but it’s one which raises an important question: do films need to bring back this tradition? Is there anything about it that’s still relevant today? 

There are definitely valid concerns associated with its return. Intermissions, by nature, disrupt the flow of a form of entertainment designed to be immersive, telling a complete story in a few hours. The return of the intermission, with this in mind, appears to feed into a worrying trend of declining audience attention spans in the era of short-form online content. Some have argued that it normalises being unable to concentrate on something more than two hours long — even though intermissions came long before short-form Internet content. 

The reasons for intermissions earning their place in a film, too, have undeniably changed since their origins in the 1930s. In this Golden Age, intermissions were essential for a practical purpose: to allow the changing of film reel. Without them, a full-length film couldn’t be shown in a cinema. In the age of digital projection, intermissions don’t need to serve this purpose. 

However, while intermissions don’t serve this practical purpose anymore, they can still adapt to suit the needs of contemporary audiences. Similarly, recent decline in audience attention spans is worrying, but pre-Internet films had intermissions without diminishing audience attention. 

Epic films like Gone with the Wind or Lawrence of Arabia, in fact, used their intermission to enhance a film’s immersive quality. They weren’t designed to be viewed in one uninterrupted sitting; intermissions enabled audiences to focus on epic films that ran for nearly four hours in total. The intermission therefore isn’t an excuse to normalise poor attention spans; in fact, it’s served to sustain concentration on unusually long films.  

Giving the audience time to take a break acts as a mental refresher, which eliminates attention spans waning after an hour or so. This makes intermissions even more important, therefore, because of the growing demand for entertainment that builds audience focus. Rather than shrinking attention spans, they give audiences a tool to strengthen their concentration for longer than an ordinary, uninterrupted movie. 

Secondly, as we become more aware of accessibility in the arts, we are also aware of another strength of the intermission: its power to increase a film’s potential audience in an inclusive way. Older people, those with medical conditions, neurodivergent viewers — all these groups will undeniably benefit from a break in the viewing experience of a film. If intermissions enable more people to engage with films (particularly longer ones), then their use should be encouraged. 

Finally, though, the most important function of the dying art of the intermission is the fact that it makes films more social. In the words of Brady Corbet, it ‘eventises’ the cinematic experience.  

The idea of ‘going out to the cinema’ doesn’t fill us with the same excitement as it once did. Cinema-going used to be a prestigious event. Venues were ubiquitous, and film stars commanded great cultural power, with iconic figures like Marilyn Monroe, Humphrey Bogart and Clark Gable having significant sway over fashion, behaviour, and social trends of the time. In short, they were a hugely influential site of community and escapism that has been undeniably lost. 

Why, though, when it’s one of the cheapest ways to go out and do something? When it’s guaranteed to spark conversation?  

The intermission is an important step that the film industry can take to revive this lost enthusiasm from the cinematic experience. Like the interval in a play, it provides audiences time to discuss what they’ve seen and what is to come. It encourages memory-making that is present and active. And it differentiates cinemas from the home streaming experience, cementing the cinema as an exciting and inexpensive social activity. 

With this in mind, the benefits of the intermission are clear. It increases accessibility, makes cinema-going social, and, if anything, helps attention spans rather than depleting them. 

They’re long overdue for a comeback; it may change the way we view films for good.

A review of The Crux: Djo turns music into a profession

0

In his new album, The Crux, Djo, aka Joe Keery, perfectly inhabits and evokes peak 70s McCartney. At the same time, he seamlessly drifts between the sonics of ELO and Harry Nilsson. There’s even a hint of The Beach Boys wrapped in there too for good measure.

The Stranger Things actor’s latest musical project takes listeners on a nostalgic, yet fresh, melodic journey to yesteryear. There is no doubt Keery has been influenced by the recording habitat of Electric Lady Studios in New York, where the likes of Stevie Wonder, David Bowie and John Lennon all recorded too. And by incorporating the personal and the observational, he manages to create something importantly rooted in the now. Djo guides you into a fascinating world – his world – and kindly lets you stay there for a while – and, damn, it’s a groovy world to visit.

Best known for his song ‘End of Beginning’, which appeared on his second album, DECIDE, Djo now enters a new musical era with The Crux. He moves away from the 80s synth vibes seen in his previous work, although songs like ‘Basic Being Basic’ do hark back to his earlier catalogue. His music now walks and talks the hazy New York city streets of the 1970s with songs like ‘Lonesome Is A State of Mind’ and ‘Link’.

However, his most musically mature and melodious work comes in the second half of the album. The first is ‘Charlie’s Garden’, a tribute to his friend and Stranger Things co-star Charlie Heaton, who features in the song. And then comes ‘Gap Tooth Smile’ and The Beach Boys-tinged ‘Golden Line’, completing the trio of classics. 

‘Charlie’s Garden’ seems like Keery at his most creatively ambitious. With influences of Paul McCartney, ELO, and Supertramp (and perhaps even The Lemon Twigs), the whacky baroque rock song is almost perfect in its imaginative and playful guise. Meanwhile, the aggressive and raw guitar of ‘Gap Tooth Smile’ shakes one into yet another dimension – a dimension where a slick and boisterous love song is the soundtrack of your daily life.

The finest and most complete song on the record, however, is the delicate and earnest ‘Golden Line’. The song is full of melancholia and ardent love but offers the listener a harmonic and tearfully joyful all-you-can-listen-to buffet for the ears. It feels like a Brian Wilson and Alex Turner love child sent our way to break our hearts. It gives ‘Golden Trunks’ vibes off of Arctic Monkeys’ divisive 6th album Tranquility Base Hotel & Casino.

Although Keery has evidently been heavily influenced by artists of the past, this doesn’t mean the album lacks authenticity. In taking from those he loves, he has moulded a creation that is truly bespoke to him.

The Crux is an album which signifies Djo’s entrance into the realms of serious musician status. It’s not that his previous work wasn’t any good. Although, at times, it was somewhat lacking. It’s more that he was seen as an actor with a music side project, rather than vice versa. After this album, however, these notions should be completely dispelled. Djo is a serious musician who’s creativity rivals that of many artists in 2025. The Crux is a must listen.

Number of Oxford students declines for first time in a decade

0

Fewer undergraduates enrolled at Oxford University in 2023-24 than in the previous reporting year, new data from the Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA) reveals. A decline of 500 enrolled undergraduate students compared to 2022-2023 was partially offset by a modest increase of 320 in the postgraduate student total. Nonetheless, the overall number of matriculated students across the University fell for the first time since 2015/16. 

The rate of increase in the number of undergraduates was already beginning to plateau since a jump of over 1,000 students following Covid-19 disruption to A-level marking in 2020. The total number of Oxford students in 2023/24 stood at 27,160.

Elsewhere in the country, it was postgraduate numbers which declined, with undergraduate attendance seeing a very minimal increase. Just over 30,000 fewer students were enrolled overall at UK universities, in the wake of university leaders highlighting the financial challenges facing the sector in the wake of dwindling numbers, with critical implications for the government’s stated growth mission. This is the first decline in student numbers in the UK higher education sector for a decade. 

Dr Hollie Chandler, Director of Policy at the Russell Group, an association of influential British universities, told the Education Select Committee last Tuesday: “We’re trying to protect the quality of our education and our research activities. The scale of the deficits we’re facing are so large that efficiency measures alone are not going to be able to address them.”

The government raised tuition fees last year in an attempt to solve part of the funding problem.

Meanwhile, demographic shifts are changing the financing landscape. The number of UK-domiciled students decreased both at Oxford and across the country. 

An especially large drop was also observed in the number of EU students, the number of whom studying in the UK has halved since 2020. Oxford continues to have the fourth most EU students, only behind UCL, Edinburgh, and King’s College London. For the number of international students in total, Oxford ranks 19th in the UK.

Clean sweep for Cambridge at Chanel J12 Boat Race weekend

0

After losing out in both the men’s and women’s lightweight races on Saturday 12th April, there were high hopes that Oxford would make amends on the big day. It wasn’t to be though, and 0/2 soon became 0/3 after the Cambridge Women’s Blues crossed the line by Barnes Bridge. By the time the Cambridge Men’s Blues did the same, Oxford were staring down an 0/6 barrel and a clean sweep. The day looked to get off to a good start as Oxford won 3/4 of the tosses, but after both Blues picked the Surrey side over Middlesex, it seems that it made little difference to the eventual result.

The day wasn’t without some controversy. In just the first (Women’s Blues) race, the two sides’ oars collided, almost shooting one of the Cambridge rowers out of her seats. Those at the Fulham fans’ zone watched on as both boats were made to stop rowing completely and await an umpire-ordained restart. Cambridge, who were ahead at the time, seemed somewhat unfazed and maintained a healthy lead for the rest of the race. Oxford were deemed to be at fault, but the umpires concluded that it would have been harsh to disqualify them entirely.

Both races were eventually won fairly convincingly, but the men’s boats did hold on slightly longer before Cambridge pulled away. They would suffer the same fate as their female compatriots however, exacerbated by a moment onscreen when the footage holds on one frame as Cambridge breeze through, before Oxford pass by some seven or eight seconds later. The eventual gap between the times was 16 seconds, one of the largest in recent memory.

After what has been a turbulent cycle on and off the water, it appears that Cambridge used all of the drama as motivation. While technically, a veteran’s race on Saturday prevented a COMPLETE clean sweep, it still leaves a bitter taste in the mouth of all Oxford fans that all boats featuring current students were on the losing side of the Thames today.

Youth and Spares complete, time for the Boat Race

0

The stage is set for the Boat Race on Sunday 13th April. Last week, the Youth Boat Race returned for its second ever outing, after enjoying successful participation in 2024. Hosted at the Fulham Reach Boat Club, 64 state schools contributed rowers to form the teams that competed over the course of the sunny Saturday morning and afternoon. While some schools formed composite crews to ensure maximised access, others put their own out. After preliminary time trial races in the morning, four side-by-side races took place with friends and family lining the banks to support. 

Adam Freeman-Pask, the CEO of Fulham Reach Boat Club offered a positive comment: “Today isn’t just about racing—it’s about the opportunity to take part, make friends, build a community, and share the journey of these incredible young athletes taking to the water. This event, inspired by the iconic Boat Race, shows that rowing belongs to everyone. Whether you’re racing, supporting, or volunteering—thank you for being part of this journey.”

Mayor Patricia Quigley also praised the growth the event had seen in just one year: “This is about more than sport. It’s about creating opportunities for young people to support one another, to build confidence, and to be part of something bigger than themselves. It’s inspiring to see how far this event has come.”

All participants were given medals in the spirit of widening participation and access.

Moving on to Wednesday, the spare pairs raced in a day that’s slightly less positive if you’re on the Oxford side. Both the men’s openweight and lightweight pairs were beaten by their Cambridge counterparts. In fact the only time Cambridge lost was when they raced themselves. After Oxford pulled out of the women’s lightweight pair in opposition of Lucy Harvard’s – the CUBC’s women’s president’s – eligibility, the Cambridge lightweight pair rowed against their openweights. Harvard had already been declared ineligible for any Blue, reserve (Blondie) or lightweight crew due to the twelve year rule – in order to be eligible, you must have matriculated twelve years ago or earlier. Oxford also wanted to race in a coxed four, rather than pairs but Cambridge insisted that while they might bend to a four, Harvard would race either way.

As squabbling continues and tensions rise, all eyes now turn to the lightweight races on Saturday, and the Blues and reserve races, set to take place on Sunday.

The schedule is as follows: 

Lightweight races on Saturday 12th April:

Women’s: 12:51

Women’s Vets: 13:11

Men’s Vets: 13:31

Men’s: 13:51

Race-day on Sunday 13th April:

Women’s Blues: 13:21

Osiris vs. Blondie: 13:36

Isis vs. Goldie: 13:51

Men’s Blues: 14:21

Find coverage on BBC One, BBC iPlayer or on the Boat Race Official YouTube channel.

Men’s Blues Hockey survive back-to-back relegation playoffs

0

The heights of the BUCS Premiership are that which most university sports clubs around the country can only dream of. These leagues are often dominated by the usual suspects – Loughborough, Nottingham, Birmingham, et cetera. So it’s always exciting to have an Oxford team competing at the same level, despite the apparent academic rigour. On Wednesday 9th April, the hockey Men’s Blues beat Cardiff Met 4-2 in the BUCS Premier playoff to stay up for another year thanks to a hat-trick from second-year Alex Adair and yet another goal in ‘Blue’s Performance Athlete’ Caspar Beyer’s debut season for OUHC. 

The Men’s Blues first achieved promotion to BUCS Prem in 2022, and the 2024-25 season marked their third year at the level. For all three seasons, they’ve come 8th out of nine teams. The BUCS Prem format means that the last-placed team gets automatically relegated, whereas the second-to-last team plays a playoff match for the chance to stay up. In 2022-23 this didn’t happen, but last year it was the narrowest of margins that saw them survive after their 2-2 draw with Cardiff Uni was sent to shuffles. This year, while the scoreline was more comfortable, the game itself was far from it. 

After a goalless and cagy first half, Adair smashed home the opener with a volley that resembled a front-foot jab, straight out of the cricketing textbook. Beyer, desperate not to be outdone, slotted home a drag-flick not long later to double Oxford’s lead – a demoralising goal for Met summarised by the frustration on their Instagram story: ‘Oxford taking their minimal chances’ was the caption. Supposedly cruising at 2-0, the jubilation was cut short when a tidy routine from Cardiff Met at a short corner saw a reverse deflection sent flying into the roof of the net to reduce the lead back to one. 

Adair would step up once again as the ball would drop to him with a yard or so of space near the edge of the circle, and he pushed it neatly into the corner past the keeper’s outstretched, last-ditch effort. There would be another twist in the tale, as Met would dispatch another corner, this time shifting the ball onto the main threat’s reverse and thumping into the far corner past keeper and postman. At 3-2, with just minutes remaining, Met pull their keeper, aiming to take advantage of having an extra man. Ultimately this would prove futile, and as Oxford latch onto the ball in midfield, Adair is slotted through for what would be his most simple goal of the afternoon, finding the empty backboard and wheeling away to celebrate the now certain victory.

A comparison in facilities between Oxford and their competitors in BUCS Prem is testament to the achievement of staying up for another year, even missing last year’s captain Archie Vaughan for the final all-important match. As Edinburgh come up to fill the last remaining spot for BUCS Prem 2025-26, Oxford will be hopeful to continue the streak of seasons spent at the top level, having survived ahead of them just a few years ago in 2022-23.

Varsity a knockout for Oxford Boxing

0

After turning the bastion of free speech into the bastion of free-flowing punches, Oxford University Amateur Boxing Club took over the Oxford Town Hall triumphantly on Friday of Week 8, only a few short weeks after Town vs Gown. Whereas town had gotten the best of gown in that particular showdown, OUABC bounced straight back to a resounding 10-4 victory over Cambridge in ruthless fashion. Ruthless not only in the margin of victory, but the manner too, as Ciaran O’Loan’s absolutely brutal knockout came just seconds after the bout began, and men’s captain Ade Olugboji had his fight stopped after raining blow after raining blow cascaded down onto the head of his Tab opposite number, until the referee had finally seen enough. In fairness, I’m not sure what else you would expect when lining up against the BUCS Championship gold medallist…

With almost 500 attendees piling into the chamber, it was an event of great numerical and historical magnitude, as it saw the first instance of four women’s fights on the main card in the 117 years that the varsity boxing match has been held. Amongst those were four included Alice Ledzion, who waltzed round her opponent almost untouched, picking her off to such a calculated degree that the judges were faced with little choice but to announce her unanimously victorious. Jasmine Guo also won her bout, bouncing back from defeat at the Town vs Gown event to pull through a fierce contest between her and Ka Ching Shelly Lee that featured some close-quarters-combat in the second round, with Shelly Lee pinned with her back to the ropes. 

While some fighters like Guo bounced back after an earlier Town vs Gown loss, Michael Cheng was one of only two boxers to win at both after beating Rhys Honey-Jones. His relentless pressure was too much for his Cambridge counterpart, as Honey-Jones simply couldn’t get anything to stick. Just like Ledzion who started off the evening, the decision was ultimately unanimous. Yet trawling through the footage of the bouts, I noticed that in the sea of 6-7GB files, two stood out as shorter than the others. I have already mentioned Ade Olugboji and Ciaran O’Loan, but the ferocity on show from those two is worth a second mention. Olugboji’s electric movement (both head and body) and vicious combinations are enough to make a second-hand viewer nervous – the standing count spelling the end of the night for his opponent. 

Ciaran O’Loan’s devastating left meant that not only was he the second boxer to win at both Town vs Gown and varsity, but he was also left without an opponent after merely ten seconds – a time so short that by the laws of Cherwell style guide, I have to write out in full. This clip has garnered serious attention, and at the time of writing, a reposted edition of the clip on Overtime Boxing’s TikTok account has 42,000 likes and 427,000 views in just three days. As user _Frank_the_Duck_ rightly points out in the comment section of the post: ‘Man said “hold this comma”.’ Although I’m more inclined to agree with Vinnie the Chinchilla: ‘Why would anyone want to risk brain damage when they are ALREADY AT OXFORD OR CAMBRIDGE?’ I suppose if you’re Ciaran O’Loan, you’re not the one at risk.

EDI report reveals less than one in ten Oxford professors are BME

0

Just 9% of professors at the University of Oxford identify as BME (Black and Minority Ethnic), according to a recent report. The Equality, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) Report provides an insight into the diversity data held by the University.

The report additionally reveals gender disparities at the top level of the University, with women making up just 22% of statutory professors, a figure that has remained stable since last year. Statutory Professors are the most senior level of academic appointment at Oxford, providing academic leadership within departments and in the wider University.

Diversity statistics on the attainment of first-class honours also feature. It shows that the first-class attainment rate for white men is 19% higher than that of BME women. Across the board, the University aims to reduce the attainment gap between all men and women to 4.4% by 2025 – the current figure stands at 10.2%, higher than the University of Cambridge’s gap of 7.0%.

On the shortcomings represented by the data, the Student Union (SU) told Cherwell: “While gaps, such as the gender attainment disparity, remain concerning, we will continue to work with the University – through initiatives like the Access and Participation Plan – to ensure meaningful action follows.”

The EDI Report is part of the University’s long-term commitment to meeting its Equality Objectives. Oxford launched its EDI Strategic Plan in October 2024, as a roadmap to improve representation and inclusivity at the University. The plan was drawn up on recommendations from staff, internal research, and other institutional change programmes.

Dr Mahima Mitra co-authored the Breaking Barriers report, which has proposed recommendations to the EDI approach taken by Oxford. Mitra told Cherwell that one area of notable progress has been “improved reporting and support in relation to bullying and harassment,” as well as perceived improvements in gender representation.

The report reveals disparities in representation across departments, with BME academics making up just 12% of humanities staff, yet constituting 24% of those in the medical sciences. Additionally, the representation of women is inconsistent across divisions. For instance, women make up just 18% of associate professor applicants in the Mathematical, Physical and Life Sciences Division (MPLS), whereas they constitute 39% in the Humanities Division. 

On the need to achieve better representation at top levels, Mitra explained: “One of the biggest challenges is a narrow diversity pipeline – insufficient representation in the talent pool and on the early and mid-career pathways that feed into the top level roles at Oxford”. The act of “hiring in your own image,” even if unconsciously, perpetuates the lack of representation on the career ladder, according to Mitra.

Mitra and her co-author Sue Dopson’s research expressed a need for better accommodation of individual needs in the workplace, specifically in relation to adjustments, support services and signposting – this is an area in need of “further attention”, she explained.

Age is another characteristic where representation gaps persist. Just 3% of all staff are aged 65 and over, with 1% of all women belonging to this age group, and 2% of men. The 65+ age group made up 0.3% of academic and research staff applications, with an offer rate of just 6%. Under 30s, by contrast, had an offer rate of 21% – over three times higher.

Oxford has previously been scrutinised for its Employer Justified Retirement Age Policy (EJRA), which had set a mandatory retirement age for academic staff. A tribunal in March 2023 ruled against the University, finding that the dismissal of four professors was unfair and showed evidence of age discrimination. The policy was later revised, though at the time, one of the four professors told Cherwell that the lengthy process had made his research prior to the ordeal difficult to restart.

The report comes amid debates over the importance of EDI initiatives in the US, where Trump has scrapped existing policies, threatening funding cuts to universities enforcing them. Drawing on the situation across the pond, the SU told Cherwell: “Now more than ever, we want to see EDI remain a clear priority at Oxford, especially at a time when such commitments are being rolled back at our American counterparts.”

On the SU’s role in advancing equality, diversity and inclusion, they added: “We will continue to champion student voice in EDI, with our VP for UG Education and Access, Eleanor Miller, being featured on the panel of the next University EDI roundtable. We also look forward to introducing dedicated Community and Equity Officers to support this important representative work in Trinity Term, as well as a Welfare, Equity & Inclusion Officer being reintroduced in July 2025.”

Helping the homeless: volunteering or voyeurism?

In the depths of the spring vacation, with Finals and the looming emptiness of What Comes After staring at me from the near future, I decided to do some volunteering. The brilliant Turl Street Homeless Action had been a place of emotional refuge for me, so I sought a way to get involved in a similar charity helping the homeless in Milan, my hometown. 

I get there at 8.30pm and am immediately recruited to load water bottle cases off a van. ‘There’ is a glamorous covered shopping avenue one street away from Piazza Duomo, Milan’s one architectural wonder and tourist hotspot. Shops closed, the street has been turned into a makeshift food kitchen, with stations where water, snacks, and warm clothes are being handed out to a gaggle of regulars. 

The group, who have been meeting once a week for years, is a well-oiled machine. Within minutes we’re packing up, moving supplies to shopping trailers and Ikea bags to bring to those who can’t – or won’t – move from their makeshift shelters scattered around the streets of Italy’s fashion and luxury capital. A gaggle of Boy Scouts, formerly middle-aged women (the sciure, often stay-at-home wives or newly retired professionals, who keep Italy’s non-profit sector running), and retired professional football players, we move between the covered walkways that by day serve as the open-air runways of aspiring models and gallery walls of fashion connoisseurs. 

On our way to a bakery, which has kindly donated its leftover pastries to us to supplement the hot drinks and sandwiches, we pass one of the city’s oldest, poshest restaurants. In the glass-enclosed patio, a couple in black tie are picking at a thimble-sized portion of what looks like truffle pasta. I wonder if I should offer the woman, at least 20 years her dining partner’s junior, one of our sandwiches instead. Past the restaurant and the bakery, a village has sprung up. 

The picture is striking. Milan’s portici, long a symbol of unattainable luxury, of slender bodies and fine fabrics inaccessible to the masses, has been reclaimed and transformed into a scattering of tents, cardboard shacks, and shopping carts holding all the earthly possessions of their owners. As we move between these elaborate makeshift homes and chat to their inhabitants, I recognise a few from the food kitchen I sometimes work at during the day. There’s the handsome, freakishly tall, shamelessly flirty young man, probably a victim of Milan’s ruthless modeling industry (which relies on undocumented immigrants and sub-human wages); the impeccably dressed elderly couple; the group of men charging their phones outside a high-end perfume store. One of them is on a video call with a woman and a small army of young children, speaking in a foreign language. 

I want to ask about their stories, and I want to write about them – and photograph them. The brutal contrast – of high fashion and extreme poverty, of precariously built structures in front of boutiques charging a month’s rent for a belt, of mannequins wearing ‘distressed’ fabric staring impassively at tents heavy with wear – would make for a brilliant photo essay. How such an enormous number of people – over 2,600 according to the latest census, nearly 1 in 500 people in Milan – slipped through the social safety net in one of Europe’s wealthiest cities is something that should be investigated. Asking the people themselves seems like the fairest way to do that, and to refute the Italian right-wing’s narrative that the vast majority of the homeless problem is caused by illegal immigrants newly arrived from Africa. Most of the people we meet speak Italian flawlessly, and many of them have gone to school in Milan; one used to be a primary school teacher in the suburbs nearby. 

Some people would speak to me, I’m sure. More would if I became a regular at these Monday-evening volunteering outings; some might even let me take their picture in front of their makeshift shelters. But I can’t help but feel that by taking my camera with me – even by asking for an interview – I’m stepping out of the shoes of a community member trying to help and walking into a territory that is much more predatory. Ultimately, I’m a student trying to go into journalism: I need a portfolio, and an investigation into Milan’s homeless population would be a hit with papers while ticking some nifty virtue-signaling boxes in the process.

Volunteering has never seemed to me to be a transactional relationship: helping others is a fundamental part of belonging to a community and living with the understanding that, if I were ever in trouble, others would do the same for me. Doing the same as a journalist feels like fundamentally changing this relationship, placing myself as an outsider profiting off others’ misfortune.

Many of the people I would be photographing are young; photos of them at their lowest moment could haunt them online long after they’ve started a different life. Older people would have decades of life immortalized in a single, unrepresentative snapshot of abject misery, which may be their only online footprint. There seems to be something inherently exploitative or opportunistic in using others’ three-dimensional, complex lives and placing them in a 3:2 aspect ratio and a couple of sentences on why their plight supports my argument on Milan’s homeless problem. In a city built on capitalizing off photos of skeletal bodies and cheap labor, this feels even more pointed.

The National Press Photographers Association’s Code of Ethics helpfully advises journalists to “intrude on private moments of grief only when the public has an overriding and justifiable need to see.” Does a life spent at the fringes of society count as a “private moment of grief, if it is in the nature of homelessness for lives to play out entirely in the public, not private, sphere? Is even just asking for an interview ethical? Is writing this story itself, a meditation on the morality of (student) photojournalism just as predatory as it sounds, an effort to build the aforementioned portfolio?

Turning the corner to finish our round, we pass the restaurant, where the same couple is still staring morosely at the same plate of tagliatelle. A few metres away, a man is lying face down on a single layer of cardboard, his nose squashed against Milan’s cold marble. He is sheltering from the drizzle in the covered walkway of a high-end furniture store, where the cheapest chaise longue is on sale at €1699.99. As we move to offer him a bottle of water, all I can think is, this would make a great cover page.

Fences surrounding Radcliffe Camera removed

0

Fencing on the lawns of the Radcliffe Camera has been removed nearly nine months after it was initially put in place. The lawn areas outside the library had previously been blocked off with metal barriers following an encampment by Oxford Action for Palestine (OA4P) last year.

The encampment, which lasted from mid May through to early July, saw protestors set up tents on the grass outside the Rad Cam. This followed a first encampment in front of the Pitt Rivers Museum, which itself was dismantled by contractors using tractors and other vehicles in June 2024.

It is currently unclear precisely when the fencing around the Radcliffe Camera was removed.

OA4P last term established an occupation of the Rad Cam, dubbing it the “Khalida Jarrar Library” for the duration of their sit-in. Protestors positioned themselves on ledges outside windows, with police eventually arresting those involved after abseiling down the side of the library with specialist climbing equipment.

Oxford University had previously threatened to pursue a court order against the protestors if they did not disband their encampment. At the time, the University told Cherwell that they were “assessing the state of the lawn and what further action is required to clear and restore the site”.

Oxford University and OA4P were both approached for comment.