Tuesday 1st July 2025
Blog Page 2049

Getting stuck in

0

President Obama gave the performance of his presidency this week, in a 90-minute appearance which has energised the democratic base, wowed the commentariat, and will likely reshape the White House’s political strategy. And here’s the twist: it wasn’t the State of the Union.

The latter was well-executed. State of the Union speeches are a tough thing to pull off, and Wednesday’s effort was pretty good, but not stellar. It had real energy at times, especially the passage on healthcare. The overarching focus was jobs, and in this sense the message was targeted squarely at improving middle America’s shaky economic confidence, which drives the President’s low approval ratings and underpins the GOP’s chances in this year’s midterm elections. He got some important messages out there loud and clear: the stimulus is working; we’ve cut taxes, not raised them. It was also a pretty diverse speech — he had some overtures to moderates and Republicans, for example on nuclear power and tax cuts for small businesses. As a political instrument, it probably will turn out to have been effective, albeit quietly — this speech won’t have turned many people into Obama-ites, but it will have cut through some of the negative chatter out there about him and his administration. Solid, but no fireworks. The speech did its job.

The main event came on Friday. Obama had been invited to make an appearance at the House Republican retreat in Baltimore. He made a twenty-minute speech which was a bit run-of-the-mill. But what followed was deeply impressive. Obama took roughly an hour of policy questions from Republican congressmen. And the President, in answering, was extraordinary. He showed a deep and nuanced awareness of the issues, and a clear understanding of Republican proposals. He provided a strong critique of some of his opponents positions, but was also quick to note the areas on which he agreed or felt there was room for cooperation. He was combative and very effective in debate, but also made a point of being courteous. In short, he looked and sounded like a statesman, and this made the Republicans, too often using the session to peddle talking points, look like small politicians. The President came across as better informed, more intellectually agile, and less outwardly political than his questioners. It was a terrific performance.

Hopefully this will prove to be a teachable moment for the White House. This innovative format was perfect for the President, but it was the change in tone which made the difference. Too often in the first year of the administration, Obama was too far above the fray. This made him appear divorced from the low politics of partisan bile, which was a good thing, but it also prevented him from displaying the considerable skills of debate he possesses, and it left many of his opponents’ charges unanswered. Quite by mistake, the White House may have stumbled upon an excellent insight into how they should change their approach — the President should ditch the above-the-fray “Rose Garden strategy” (as one commentator dubbed it) which has perpetuated the perception of disconnection and aloofness, and get stuck in.

He can start by doing events identical to Friday’s every month, on TV, live. It would improve political discourse, and it would help him reconnect with the masses he’s in danger of losing. The Republicans will have to agree or be painted as running scared.

Norwegian novelty

0

Browsing the Norwegian national newspapers revealed a number of interesting things today: The name of Norway’s smallest pony and the fact that Norwegian electro heroes Datarock are swapping CDs with the guys from Depeche Mode.

My personal favourite has got to be Dagbladet’s very own news flash that obviously deserved its status as cover story; “28 Swans nearly froze stuck [to ice] in Langesund”. Don’t worry, as you can discern from the photos that accompany the article, they were saved in the nick of time by a Lemmy-from-Motorhead-lookalike. What I really can’t get my head around, is why no one thought to get a Swan Lake pun in there somewhere.

The swan story is a daring attempt at bringing somewhat troubling news to the attention of its Nordic readers – though of course it had a happy ending, which made it particularly printable. Other unsavoury subjects to be broached by the Norwegian press include the discovery of a Swedish porn ring , the sex life of England’s football captain, and the death of a Roma following a dispute between gypsy families in Oslo. Please note, none of these stories feature any Norwegians behaving badly. We’re just too busy breeding minute horses, saving swans and producing super cool electronica. Not to mention winning Eurovision last year, and having the honour of hosting it in May!

Yes, if the prolonged lives of 28 swans isn’t enough to warm my compatriots hearts during this bitter winter, coverage of the upcoming event should manage just this. What with NRK, Norway’s BBC, unveiling both the colour and theme intended for Eurovision 2010 – pink, and “Share the Moment”. According to Hasse Lindo, of NRK (Norway’s BBC) “We want to share the Eurovision Song Contest, rather than just broadcast it.” Fabulous.

Whilst Norway is keen to share its Eurovision moment with anyone kitsch enough to not be repulsed by the whole thing – the country is about to have a different moment altogether, and one that it is unlikely to want to “share” with the rest of Europe. This would be the first ever Black Metal Musical, starring Gorgoroth’s former frontman and church burning-enthusiast Gaahl. Not only is it taking place on the National Stage (something that has upset quite a few local priests), but it’s actually happening in the same month as Eurovision. Given that the whole black metal movement of the 90s was a extreme response to Norway’s conformist and sugar coated culture; the timing of the event is, quite simply, perfect. (Not that I condone chuch burning in anyway, mind).

P.S. If you were wondering what a black Metal Musical would be like, imagine this on stage accompanied by a slush puppy: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g5NSvtWirS4.

Emma Johnson and Pascal Rogé

0

As part of Music at Oxford’s 09/10 concert season, Emma Johnson (clarinet) and Pascal Rogé (piano) offered one of the most promising concert programmes I have seen for a while – from Weber and Brahms to Stravinsky and Copland, the range of music was impressive and the artists never sounded out of their depth.

The opening Silvana Variations by Weber were played with brimming enthusiasm, although it was at first difficult to gain a solid impression of Johnson’s character while she was dominating the hall by walking around centre-stage. This was rectified with the pleasant surprise of anecdotal information before each piece – a story about one of Weber’s premières being poorly attended due to one of the first hot-air balloon ascents gave the kind of informal atmosphere you’d hope for when attending a concert to both appreciate and learn something about the music.

The largest piece on the programme was Brahms’s first Clarinet Sonata, which the composer wrote after he was stunned by the clarinettist Richard Mühlfeld – an experience which lifted him out of a brief retirement. Johnson infused the piece with great energy and lyricism, although it is a ‘Sonata for Clarinet and Piano’ as much as it is a ‘Clarinet Sonata’, and she was overbearing in places, unfortunately making some of the piano’s greatest passages inaudible.

Rogé was a fine accompanist throughout, and he fully seized the opportunity to display his own virtuosity with a piece for piano solo – La Cathédrale Engloutie from the first book of Préludes by Debussy. This was one of the most moving pieces of the night thanks to Rogé’s ability to evoke the image of the cathedral of Ys rising from the sea with its tolling bells, and he thus demonstrated his acclaimed affinity for French pianism.

The second half of the programme exemplified the pair’s light-hearted approach, particularly with their final piece, Milhaud’s Scaramouche. Originally written (and named) for a theatre specialising in performances aimed at children, they certainly performed with a child-like vigour, and this was complemented by a touching encore of Benny Goodman’s take on Paganini’s Caprice No. 24 as a birthday treat for a young clarinettist in the audience.

 

 

 

 

Guilty Pleasures

0

Over the vacation I was exposed to the monstrosity that is The Muppet Wizard of Oz. It tells the story of a young girl who finds out there’s no place like, um, Hollywood as she journeys to Oz to fulfil her dreams of super stardom. With cameos from Kelly Osbourne and Ashanti, the film drained all the magic out of the story and left me feeling distinctly dissatisfied. Was I just getting too old for this? I decided to revisit some childhood favourites, The Muppet Treasure Island and The Muppet Christmas Carol and realised it’s not me that’s changed, it’s them!

The wonderful thing about these two Muppet films is the way human actors are integrated so seamlessly. They interact so naturally with the puppets that you completely forget that the majority of the characters are not real, living creatures; they are, quite simply, brought to life before our eyes. Surprisingly, both films are relatively true to the novels which they are based on (ok, no Captain Smollett wasn’t a frog in Treasure Island but you do get a real sense of the books. Honest).

There are some great comic moments in Muppet Treasure Island. The dying Billy Bones’ words to Jim Hawkins never fail to make me smile (‘Beware running with scissors or any other pointy object! It’s all good fun until somebody loses an eye!’) There’s some good old fashioned slapstick and catchy songs thrown in for good measure.

So we’ve got the laughs covered but do the films have heart? All I can say is, I’ve seen a lot of film versions of A Christmas Carol and as yet I haven’t come across a portrayal of Tiny Tim that is more endearing than the small green frog of the Muppet film. Half the time they’re stage school brats; the prospect of their death doesn’t really strike fear into your heart, but somehow Kermit junior manages to capture the innocent, wide-eyed vulnerability of Tim without it being too sentimental. Michael Caine is so convincingly moved by the journey he is taken on by the spirits that you find yourself, rather embarrassingly, on the verge of tears in a film which stars a frog, a pig, a rat and a… whatever that thing is.       

Many films are advertised as ‘fun for the whole family’ but there are very few which live up to this label. These Muppet films, however, do have a genuine all age appeal; perfect for re-living those childhood moments.

Heavenly Features

0

This month’s adaptation of The Lovely Bones continues the cinematic tradition of contemplating what comes next, after one has shuffled off this mortal coil. As far as artistic challenges go, depicting the afterlife with any degree of success is undeniably formidable. Yet it is a challenge that has inspired countless gifted and foolhardy filmmakers to attempt the definitive version of life on the other side.

The landscape of the afterlife on display in The Lovely Bones, wandered by the soul of Suzy Salmon, a young girl murdered and forced from afar to watch her family come to terms with their wrenching bereavement, is one of the more elaborate to be created onscreen. The way in which it fluctuates to symbolically reflect her mood, bursting into verdant life one moment and becoming a ravaged wasteland the next, is reminiscent of What Dreams May Come, an almost forgotten fantasy-drama from 1998 starring Robin Williams.
Effectively a pop-culture retelling of Dante’s Inferno, relating the story of a man who decides to travel from Heaven to Hell to rescue his wife, damned for committing suicide, the film is heavy-handed and overwrought, yet endearing for its remarkable visual sensibility: the realms of the saved and the condemned Williams traverses have a painterly feel, lit with a golden haze, and melting into one another like Renaissance masterpieces in an overheated art gallery.

In terms of computer-generated otherworldly vistas, the Hell of Constantine is also worth remarking upon; smartly opting to update traditional imagery of the fire-and-brimstone underworld, the art team built a Hell modelled after the modern urban environment, only one that appears to be caught in a perpetual nuclear blast.

No film has more poignantly shown the audience a literal Heaven, meanwhile, than Powell and Pressburger’s sublime British classic, A Matter of Life and Death. Ingeniously, the team behind it decided to shoot the scenes on Earth in vibrant Technicolour and those in Heaven, including the final set-piece at the Celestial Court, in shimmering monochrome, where it might have seemed more obvious to do the reverse. As it is, the black and white photography evokes a Heaven that is both timeless and distant from our reality, momentous and yet diminished by the Arcadian splendour of the WW2-era England in which the film is largely set.

Nonetheless, the overwhelmingly literal spin on the afterlife that these films adopt causes dramatic problems in that despite being spectacular they also risk losing sight of the human anxieties that define them. Most importantly our fear of death, and the desire to believe in something else beyond it. Ingmar Bergman’s The Seventh Seal is for this reason the film to deal most unforgettably with the question of an afterlife. Concerning a knight of the crusades, tormented by doubts over the existence of God in a time of plague and religious hysteria, it draws upon the tradition of medieval artwork to portray a universe in which Death, personified and with a penchant for deciding mortals’ fates over games of chess, stands between us and any glimpse of a comforting afterlife.

Whilst we can rest assured that the future will bring further colourful and eclectic versions of the afterlife to our cinemas, it is unlikely that any will approach the power of Bergman’s, made all the more present to our minds by its disturbing and agonising invisibility.

Online review: A Prophet

0

Sometimes a film has to underwhelm before it can satisfy. Building on the success of 2005’s The Beat That My Heart Skipped, such has been the critical acclaim garnered by Jacque’s Audiard’s latest that at first it appears simply unable to live up to the hype. Lazy comparisons to Jean-Pierre Melville or The Godfather haven’t helped. A Prophet may be long, French, and include Mediterranean gangsters, but its largely uncinematic, observational feel has more in common with recent films such as The Hurt Locker than either of these – in fact, one of its most admirable characteristics is that it constantly avoids giving you the film you’d expect.

One wouldn’t necessarily infer this from the story. A young French Arab, Malik El Djebena (a breakthrough performance by Tahar Rahim), begins a six-year prison sentence. A chance conversation with a fellow inmate brings him to the attention of the prison’s ruling elite, a group of Corsican crime-bosses led by the patriarchal César (Neils Arestrup, admittedly looking something like a grizzled French Don Corleone). After his brutal forced initiation into César’s circle, Malik’s subsequent ascent of the Corsican crime hierarchy allows him to pursue his own criminal agenda, using the people and information he comes into contact with on the inside to play off various sides against each other for his own profit.

Yet even as Malik’s interventions in the outside world become increasingly complicated, the film’s extended running time makes what would traditionally be climactic twists seem like just more episodes, and it is a testament to the scriptwriters and editor that this tactic doesn’t slip into torpidity. Instead, through allowing the story and characters to develop at a relatively lifelike pace, such a flattened, linear progression actually enhances the film’s impact, provoking a constant unease regarding just how it will end up. The unfussy cinematography also helps this, refusing to draw too much attention to any particular moment or scene, and exercises enough self-control to come across as realistic without seeming overly messy or ugly.

Often, it is the careful manipulation of documentary-like aspects which really betrays Audiard’s skill: a particularly memorable example is Malik’s lingering over signing a legal form, his near-illiteracy brought uncomfortably to the fore. The film’s sound design often has the same effect: early scenes present a progression of half-indifferent, half-commanding bureaucratic voices, whilst the prison itself is a constant background of taunts and shouts echoing blurrily along the corridors. Outside, an incoherent tannoy constantly chastises inmates in the exercise yard – conveying well a world of authority present but almost always ignored. The naturalistic performances are generally strong, with Rahim’s strikingly believable performance conveying well his character’s mix of the tense, the vulnerable and the uncomfortably complicit. Meanwhile, Arestrup memorably imparts both his expectant ferocity and ultimately embittered dejection: an unsuccessful public attempt to catch Malik’s attention yields surprising pathos, Arestrup looking like an unwanted fifth-best-friend across the schoolyard.

Yet amidst all this, Audiard periodically introduces elements which seem bent on deliberately undermining the lifelike tone: thus at various points we are presented with a ghost, Tarantino-esque chapter titles, more typical gangster-film montages, two almost Lynchian visual sequences, not to mention Alexandre Desplat’s self-consciously cinematic music. These have mixed results: although they admirably prevent the film from becoming too monotonous, only in a few cases do their contributions seem to really add something beyond this, and the better elements – the various apparitions and hallucinations – feel too spasmodic and underused to fulfil their potential.

It is to Audiard’s credit that he manages to make all this realism, magic realism, and apparent self-reference co-exist quite effortlessly. Overall, the conflicting aspects and subtle shifts in direction seem like part of the general refusal to give you the film you expect; the intention is admirable, but the film’s story and construction simply aren’t original enough to prevent this seeming like a substitute for being truly innovative. This is not to say that A Prophet is not worth seeing: the end-product is well put-together, thought-provoking and becomes increasingly compelling as it progresses. It succeeds well on its own terms; whether it has much lasting impact will remain to be seen.

Three stars 

Oxford Blues Men’s Football v Nottingham Trent 27.01.10

0

Oxford University took on Nottingham Trent at football in a tense title-deciding match on 27th January 2010.

Cherwell Photo Blog – Week 3!

0

Fancy yourself as a photographer?

Want your photographs from around and about Oxford seen by the thousands of people who visit the Cherwell website every day?

If so, why not send a few of your snaps into [email protected]?

 

 

Friday: Balliol at Night – Charlie Guo

 

Thursday: Equus – Ollie Ford

 

Wednesday: Purple Sky – Jenny Attwater

 

Tuesday: Behind the scenes in Christ Church kitchens – Ollie Ford

 

Monday: Polish Representation at the European Affairs Society’s European Food event – Adrian Krajewski

 

Sunday: Trust – Michelle Tan

 

 

Saturday: Oxford Imps at the Wheatsheaf – Sonali Campion

"May I check your ticket…"

0

I have no intention to transform this blog into a tirade of hate against Europe. It’s pretty fair to say that I love most things European, be it German books, Czech beer, Norwegian mountains, and all those other cliches I’d prefer not to bore you with now. That said, there is something truly evil and wrong about its ticket inspectors and I find myself willing them to be force fed those badges that they brandish so proudly, as if this single object validated their entire existence. 

 

This outburst is somewhat substantiated by today’s news story in Spiegel Online of how this poor 16 year old girl got kicked off a train, late a night and in minus 18 degrees, for forgetting her student ID. Even though said ticket inspector knew full well that the girl did not have to pay the full fee, having dealt with the “upstanding citizen” in the past, the spineless excuse for a human being still had her ejected. The inspector said she was “just fulfilling her duty”, which was obviously not the best quote to give to the German press. I wonder if the Daily

Mail will jump on this story tomorrow – I can just picture their reporter now, desperately googling the name Julia Reischl in hope that it’s Jewish.

   

As you can probably gather, I’ve had my fair share of ticket inspector blues. In London (please don’t take this as an attempt to pretend London has the superior transport system, I know TFL is terrible), you have barriers, i.e. there is a machine obstructing unpaid passage, as opposed to some deluded civil servant hiding away on a train.

 

Berlin has no such barriers, meaning its entire underground system is a massive playground where rude inspectors pounce on passengers who were silly enough to try their luck. I don’t like that they are supposed to “blend in” with the crowd, that they time their inspections just as the door slams shut, and that if you can’t pay up immediately or don’t have your ID on you, they are obliged to call the police. I also don’t like how if you pretend you don’t speak German and couldn’t understand the ticket machine, they insult you loudly in their own tongue. All of this isn’t particularly condusive to a pleasant, paranoia free, “let’s love the establishment” atmosphere. 

 

And don’t get me started on the Paris Metro staff. 

 

P.S. I duly note that there must be some nice ticket inspectors out there, I just haven’t met them yet.

 

The original Spiegel Online article in German:

http://www.spiegel.de/panorama/0,1518,674844,00.html

 

A news account on the subject in English: http://www.thelocal.de/national/20100129-24897.html