Sunday 14th September 2025
Blog Page 2082

Jingle hell?

0

Released last month, Bob Dylan’s 47th studio album, Christmas in the Heart, has something to teach us, or to remind us of. It may seem an unlikely claim – since most Christmas pop music is closer to soul-destroying than festive – but some of it is actually worth seeking out.

The problem is that the stuff worth seeking out constitutes a tiny, tiny fraction of all the songs that make up the genre; discovering it is an arduous task.

There are, to be sure, a small number of good Christmas tunes which you can indulgently enjoy over the festive season – ‘Fairytale of New York’ by The Pogues, for example, or John Lennon’s ‘Merry Xmas (War is Over)’. But beyond these, finding good Christmas songs is not easy.

Of the hundred-plus recorded versions of ‘White Christmas’, for example, at least ninety are essentially indistinguishable from one another – all equally horrible. Any one of them might star on Tesco’s inevitable seasonal compilation CD without you noticing the slightest difference.

It’s unsurprising that this homogenous mass includes attempts by the likes of Westlife, Girls Aloud and Katy Perry. But the miserable list also boasts versions by a host of legends and luminaries: Ella Fitzgerald, Johnny Cash, and Elvis Presley, to name a few.

This is the strange thing, and presumably the reason why there’s so much bad, and so little good, Christmas music: singers and bands, however original, tend to lose their identities when it comes to Christmas.

David Bowie exemplifies this. Finding out he’d done a Christmas song, I was sure it’d be anything but generic and bland. And, sure enough, the first two minutes of his collaboration with Bing Crosby on ‘Little Drummer Boy’ were promising: a bizarre roleplay between the two musicians, amongst the weirdest things Bowie’s put on record. But the music itself is a dead loss. Still worth checking out the absurd video though.

When great artists do retain their identity in Christmas songs, the results can be amazing. Christmas With The Beach Boys is a wonderful album, with a version of ‘White Christmas’ that I’d actually call good. Joni Mitchell’s ‘River’ is a great Christmas song. Sufjan Stevens’ five-disc collection Songs for Christmas is also exceptional. The compilation It’s a Cool, Cool Christmas, released in 2000, features some brilliant tracks – originals as well as covers and adaptations – especially notable among which are ‘Alan Parsons in a Winter Wonderland’ by Grandaddy, ‘Just Like Christmas’ by Low, and The Flaming Lips’ spaced-out take on ‘White Christmas’.

Dylan’s latest album is a bit like these. I mean, it’s not classic Dylan, by any means, and there are some low points on it – his attempts at carols in particular – but at least it’s distinctive, which is more than can be said for most of this music; and so long as you’re not averse to his crumbly old voice, some of the versions are actually good.

 

Oxford forced to cancel Boat Race trials

0

Oxford University rowers were forced to abandon Boat Race trials on Thursday after one of their boats filled with water.

The failure of the electric bailing pump on board one boat, known as “Pinky”, meant the race between the two Oxford crews was called off at Hammersmith Bridge. The boats had earlier taken shelter inside the navigation buoys of the Surrey station.

Coach Sean Bowden had hoped to restart the race, but fears that some crew members were becoming hypothermic while the boat was slowly emptied of water led to the race being cancelled.

Despite the boat taking on water, Bowden stated that its modern design would have prevented it from sinking.

Both Oxford and Cambridge held their trials on Thursday, although the Oxford crew got the worst of the adverse weather conditions. Both Cambridge boats completed the course successfully.

The Trial Eights are the only chance for the crews to race the entire Boat Race course before the race itself, so this cancellation is especially disappointing for the Oxford rowers. This year’s Boat Race will take place on the 3rd of April 2010.

Selections for the Boat Race do not take place based on these trials alone. Two of Oxford’s star rowers, the American internationals Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss, were unable to compete on Thursday due to examinations.

The last boat to have sunk in the Boat Race was the Cambridge team of 1978, who had to be rescued from the Thames.

The Good, the Bad and the MTV

0

It’s the end of term and I feel like I’ve worked (quite) hard. More than anything I’m looking forward to going home and relaxing over Christmas; my form of relaxation over Christmas includes eating coma-inducing amounts of food, having a drink before it’s socially acceptable and watching bad, bad TV.

I love bad TV: America’s Next Top Model, Project Runway, anything on MTV- they are my extremely guilty pleasure, the kind of guilty pleasure that creates a vague sense of nausea after, that can only be dissolved by another round of brain numbing entertainment. Vapid girls prancing around in front of botoxed judges telling them modelling is one of the hardest jobs in the world? Yes please. More American accents dressing more vapid girls whilst telling us how fashion designer is going to save the world, one hemline at a time. Oh, yes. Anything on MTV? Clear my spot on the sofa, it’s going to be a long night.

I could pretend that I love bad TV because it’s a damning indictment of the failings of modern day society, or because it’s an ironic comment on the detriments of consumerism or a wry, satiric look at the deteriorating Western society. It’s not though, and I’m pretty sure I couldn’t BS my way through one of those arguments for any longer than an episode of Cribs.

I love bad TV because I know it’s bad. It’s not trying to teach me anything (except, perhaps how to claw your fifteen minutes of fame out of a weak concept for a reality TV show) and it doesn’t take itself too seriously. Bad TV is the anti-Oxford, and for six weeks of the holiday it is the antidote to lectures, essay crises, and that feeling that if you read one more thing, just one more, your brain might just explode.

The thing is, TV has been shown not to be good for us. Research has shown, in a study of 1,345 children, that three hours of TV a day made children 30% more likely to attention deficit disorder. Another study showed that young children who watch too much television have impaired language development but that children aged two to five may benefit from good-quality educational TV, enhanced when programmes are watched and discussed with an adult, according to researcher Dr Robin Close, for the National Literacy Trust. Children who watch a lot of TV, particularly of the type intended for adults, show markedly slower development. Of course, the effect will be very different for adults- but this is clearly meant to tell us something: good TV is good, bad TV is very, very, bad for you.

It is embarrassing to watch bad TV. That’s why I don’t indulge myself during term time, after being hunched over my laptop, headphones in, loading the latest episode of Trinity when I was definitely in the middle of a much publicised essay disaster. I tell my mum that there’s nothing else on and she gives me a suspicious look that says when I’m home suddenly the quality of TV seems to plummet dramatically.

I know that bad programming, the type of which I am such a fan, is leading to the dumbing down of the population, the deficit of thought and the corrosion of culture and that, despite the emergence of the internet, it is still untouchable as the prime source of our entertainment. I know, I know- I study English, I shouldn’t even have a TV in the house and if, shock horror, I do then I should be using it as the media for some sort of modern art installation commenting on, say, the failings of modern society. TV is a passive media, it requires no interaction (unless of course you want to be charged 50p for a life changing vote on X Factor…), you can only change channels or turn it off. I know I should do the latter, but I still don’t. Passivity is far easier- perhaps in the world of choice, I am simply exercising my right not to choose.

I watch bad TV because in a horrible, smug way, I can pretend to myself that I am impervious to it- maybe even slightly above it- because I know it’s bad TV. I don’t take it seriously. But, if we’re honest, that’s no excuse, really, is it? It’s probably not even really true. Maybe, I have to admit that I am just a completely average, MTV generation girl, as described in some far of market research survey somewhere- and that some TV mogul sitting a hundred floors up, in a penthouse office, knows exactly what I want to watch.

Review – A Level Drama Showcase

0

It was not without some feeling of curiosity that I arrived at the drama studio of Methodist College Belfast last night, revisiting the haunts of my six-months-younger self. How would an evening of sixth form original drama compare after a term of watching the best (and worst) the Oxford stage had to offer? Two hours and three plays later, I still wasn’t sure how to answer my own question.

Devised drama must be the most challenging element of the A Level course. Any subject, any style and off you go – it’s compulsory Cuppers without any freedom in team formation or even an (official) after-party. Memories of my class’s efforts, and especially the excruciating opening dance sequence, came flooding back as I flicked through the programmes. No wonder these students’ choice of settings revolved around war-zones, prisons and mental institutions, I decided – it just sounded like an average day in an A Level drama class.

The first play of the night, Dear Sarah, dealt with the effects of an ill-fated World War II romance. The plot’s reliance on one major coincidence did not mar its enjoyability: this was a story which, while slightly predictable, had human interest and a unity of impression, unusual in a collaborative piece. Particularly successful moments included the opening ‘dance hall’ sequence and the scene between Piotrek Adamski (played by August Mazurek) and his father (Mark Mullan). If not bound by time constraints, the character of Sarah Nelson (Elizabeth Crooks) could have been developed further by more frequent changes between past and present, but the piece was slick, well-paced and executed with confidence.

‘A Level devised drama is compulsory Cuppers without any freedom in team formation or an after-party.’

This was followed by The Brothers’ Dilemma – a play about two brothers who decide to rob a bank. In contrast to the previous play, where plot (largely due to time and cast numbers) had to take precedence over characterisation, the protagonists (in particular Ryan Donaldson’s Dan and Rory Tinman’s Jack) had depth and psychological interest. Yet It was the story which didn’t quite match up. There were just too many elements to cram into a short piece; paternal abandonment, romantic jealousy, depression, delusion, death, betrayal and suicide all featured in quick succession, themes to which a five act tragedy might struggle to do justice. The group’s inventive incorporation of film clips, music and pre-recorded speeches, however, was very impressive, and they were used especially poignantly at the end of the piece.

Over the Rainbow – our last theatrical instalment for the evening – saw stock topics for A Level work (murder, madness, Vietnam) rolled out again, but with a refreshingly original twist. It’s 1969 and Dorothy (Aisling Esmonde) isn’t in Kansas anymore, but Fairview Mental Institution, surrounded by patients who, while telling their stories, start playing out the roles of the scarecrow, tinman and lion in carefully incorporated dialogue from the film. The effect was a warped and disturbing fairytale and the group displayed theatrical know-how in not overplaying the Oz elements. Morgan MacIntyre shone as ‘brainless’ Alice and the ‘exercise’ scene gave all the actors a chance to explore their characters’ phys

icality (an opportunity exploited particularly by Thomas Olver as Ryan).

Yet leaving school to return to the real world of reading lists and Cherwell deadlines, my overall impression was not of the individual plays’ strengths and weaknesses but of the admiration I had for their successful crea

tion as pieces of drama at all. The class’s first forays into collaborative drama prove two things for certain – that they are well-armed with the tools of drama and that, whichever universities they end up at (Oxford or elsewhere), they won’t remain too far from a student stage.

 

Get set: Summer 2010

0

It’s the Christmas holidays, and despite the fact that this is doubtlessly the laziest time of the year, I tend to lapse into panic, fretting over the question: so what exactly I am going to do next summer?

Firstly, my adventures have to be either cost-neutral or money-earning. I am fed up of asking parents, ‘Please, can I have some more?’, and thus any travels have to be offset by the earlier earned money. Secondly, a summer has to be a learning experience in itself – I would hate it if the only memory from the summer were hung-over mornings spent waiting on tables at the local restaurant.

Below is a short list of work-related summer offerings. If you have more ideas/suggestions that were missed here, please leave a comment in the box below.

Camp America

Remember ‘Parent Trap’ with Li-Lo? Do you want to check out what happens at ‘Band Camp’? Yes, you too can be the part of the great American childhood experience by working as a counsellor or activity specialist at a summer camp in the USA. You will make BFFs (Best Friends Forevah) within minutes, you will munch on chocolate doughnuts for breakfast and be haunted mercilessly by those cheery songs (R-E-D, on our way to victory!). After two months’ work, you will be $1,000 richer and probably have many unforgettable memories. What’s more, after having got to know your fellow counsellors, you’ll never need to pay for a hotel in America again.

Work for an MP

This gem of a website is a must for anyone considering a career in politics or non-governmental organisations. Opportunities for internships are posted daily, so whether you fancy doing research for an MP or you’d like to volunteer with The World Hepatitis Alliance, all tastes are catered for. Most of the posts are unpaid, but come with expenses allowances. Needless to say, they’re all very competitive. 

London Citizens

Baskers did it. Barclay did it. So, if you want to be the next OUSU President, you should do it too. At the London Citizens Summer Academy, you tackle violence in East London, work on the Living Wage campaign and integrate migrants and asylum seekers into a happy society. In short, you will be organising communities. Get ambitious.

StudyChina

A government sponsored three-week program sending UK undergraduates to China. You pay for flights, they pay for language, Tai-Chi, calligraphy classes; trips to visit local curiosities and most importantly, accommodation. A fantastic opportunity to get to know the far East.

European Volunteering Service

I’m not sure if it’s because of most Britons’ inherent Euro-scepticism, but EU-funded projects do not get much interest. Pity, because if you manage to get through the administrative framework, they can provide experiences you will treasure for a lifetime. The European Volunteering Service provides opportunities for 19-30-year olds to undertake expenses-paid volunteering tasks in an EU country. It’s perfect for those who want to practice their French while doing something useful like working with local youth groups, or help out with the organisation of a film festival in Netherlands.

TravelAid, OSCA, ODA

“The whole university is made up entirely of head boys and girls who were sports team captains, play piano to Grade 8 standard, speak ten languages and spend their free time saving the world.” Even though OUSU cites this statement as an Oxford myth, some people really take to heart the ‘save the world’ bit. That is why each year we have hundreds of students building shacks and teaching kids in third world countries.

Internships

(www.milkround.com, www.wexo.co.uk)

If you really feel the urge to jump into the real world, milkround and wexo will be the first points of call. Milkround provides comprehensive listings of all graduate recruitment companies. £12,000 at the end of summer? Tick. Soul sold irrevocably to an investment bank? Tick. In contrast, Wexo contains an impressive database of companies recruiting for work experience positions. From ‘airy fairy’ PR industries to James Caan’s Hamilton Bradshaw, it is now extremely easy to apply for short-term positions.

 

OULC visits Downing Street

0

Five members of Oxford University Labour Club (OULC) were invited for a tour of 10 Downing Street this week, following their successful campaigning work during Trinity term.

“This is the first time the Labour Club have been invited to 10 Downing Street,” said Charlotte Carnegie, co-Chair of OULC for Hilary term.

OULC is the biggest student Labour Club in Britain. Over the past two terms, OULC’s speakers have included Alistair Campbell, David Miliband, Jack Straw, Peter Mandelson, Harriet Harman and Ken Livingstone.

Carnegie described what happened at Number 10. “We had the chance to see Gordon Brown’s main office as well as Tony Blair’s former office, which was quite different, with armchairs and sofas. Then we went to the second floor where Margaret Thatcher worked; every Prime Minister seemed to have their specific way of working with a different room layout. We bumped into Peter Mandelson and Ed Balls. We also saw Gordon Brown’s son, which reminded us that 10 Downing Street is a family home as well as offices.”

Hannah Cusworth, co-Chair of OULC for Hilary term commented, “In Trinity we did a lot of canvassing and worked from 5am until 10pm on the day of the local and European elections.” She added, “I think the Party values the fact that we’re working to help Labour on a national scale, not just having drinks.”

Oliver Harvey, President of the Oxford Conservative Association (OCA) commented, “OCA have always had very strong links with the national Party. We hope they feel that we are a valuable addition to the campaigning force.”

Harvey wished to add that “OCA have also been to Downing Street, to deliver a petition about the health care of ex-service men and women. We were then hosted by Lord Freeman, a Conservative Peer, at the House of Lords.”

Smear scandal sparks electoral reform debate

0

Reforms have been proposed to the voting system for the Professor of Poetry post at Oxford in an attempt to increase accessibility and voter participation. 

However, there have been criticisms that public scrutiny will discourage potential candidates.

Under the new proposals it will be possible to vote online as well as in person, with the election held over a longer period of time. It is hoped that this will increase accessibility. Previously it was difficult for the electorate who live away from Oxford to vote, as voting was only possible in person in Oxford, on a single day. The reforms will apply from the next election, due to take place in mid-2010, with the winner to take on the post from that autumn.

The vote is open to all Oxford graduates as members of Oxford University’s Convocation. Of around 300,000 potential voters in May’s election, less than 500 turned out to vote.

The news comes after the last election in May, contended by Derek Walcott, Ruth Padel and Arvind Mehrotra, ended in farce.

Walcott, a Nobel laureate, withdrew, claiming the election had “degenerated into a low and degrading attempt at character assassination”, after details of sexual harassment allegations made against him decades earlier were sent anonymously to academics in Oxford.

Padel won the subsequent vote over Mehrotra, but later admitted previously sending emails related to the allegations to two journalists, and, although denying any association with the mailshot, resigned.

The deputy chair of the English Faculty board, Seamus Perry, lauded the proposed reforms as a solution to this non-participation, saying, “It is good news that the election will be so much more accessible to the large community of graduates of the university that have the chance to vote for Oxford’s professor of poetry.”

However, in light of May’s scandal, the campaign tactics and media attention associated with popular elections has led to some criticism of such a system, the problems of which are likely only to be exacerbated by further accessibility and voter participation.

Judith Palmer, director of the Poetry Society, claimed the position’s “showbiz aspect” discourages “many excellent poets”, and that the changes “will probably increase the number… ruling themselves out.”

One such poet is Clive James. He has admitted that the Professorship “is the only job I want”, but says that he would “rather throw himself off a cliff” than stand for election. James cites problems with the election process far before the Padel-Walcott debacle.

Pedro Ferreira, Ruth Padel’s campaigner during the last election said, “if there is to be an election to decide who gets the post, then being able to vote online is a great idea”, but added that he was “not at all sure that elections are the bes

t way to award the professorship

“, admitting “there are problems” with such a system.

The new proposals are still subject to approval by Oxford University’s Congregation of academic and administrative staff, and are due to be considered early in the new year.

The Secret Life of a Tuk-Tuk Driver

0

Mid-September in Bangkok, our first night in Thailand. We had only just stepped out of our hostel to have a quick look around before dinner, but were now completely lost. As the setting sun’s view of the city is suddenly obscured by harsh thunderclouds, rain comes bulleting down in large, warm drops. Wet, tired and hungry, we see a man in white walksup to us, like and angel through the rain. He is smiling. ‘You from England?’ he asks with a strangely cockney accent, then, ‘My name Jimmy, you?’ We introduce ourselves. He explains that he is the security guard for the Iron Palace, but it is closed for a Thai public holiday. He says that today all tuk tuks are only 10 Baht (20p) and ushers us towards a smiling driver: Dom. Jack and I look at each other. We enter the poorly constructed vehicle and moments later we’re hurtling through the streets at breakneck speeds.

We have no idea it’s all part of a con.

For those of you who are not familiar with tuk tuks, they are essentially a cross between the back end of a rickshaw and the front of a very wide Vespa. A tuk tuk driver will eat, nap and even shave in his vehicle and can spend up to 12 hours a day cruising around for a fare. They started out as a legitimate form of transport and even today still are for Thai locals- that said, they also have an unexplained affinity for the wrong side of the road. However, about 20 or 30 years ago something changed. The massive growth of tourism in Thailand gave them a chance to make a bit of extra cash, and not simply by taking people from A to B.

Some vendors give drivers a small reward for sending potential customers their way. This evolved into the first con we encountered: The Thai Tailor Scam. Dom said he was taking us to the Golden Buddha, but he first needed to get some food for later. We assumed we were his last fare of the day, so did not question him. He stopped us outside a Tailor’s and said that we should go and have a look inside. We did. Instantly loud tailors dressed in garishly shiny clothes surrounded us. ‘What cut? What material? 2 Jackets or 3? Real Italian Silk. Deliver to Hotel. Cheap-cheap!’ ‘No we’re just looking.’ With that they lost it. They started to become increasingly hostile, insinuated that we were stealing and suggested we pay them 1,000 Baht each before we left. We said (truthfully) that we didn’t have the money and ran out into Dom’s open arms.

Some people aren’t so lucky. They get suckered in with sweet talk and are amazed at the relatively low prices. On ordering their garments they are asked to pay upfront, which they do. They will leave to find that their driver has been paid in petrol coupons and has vanished. To make matters worse, the garments either never arrive at the hotel or do arrive, but are made out of polyester or nylon and are shoddily sewn together.

Backpackers are considered slightly more discerning than family tourists due to their lack of money, however, Mr & Mrs Tuk catch them out too. The Tourist Agency scam is very much like the Tailor scam. Tuk-tuk man takes you to a tourist agency, saying it i‘Government sanctioned. You walk in, and, if you don’t have plans you get sweet talked into buying a trip with them. They say that the government also subsidises them, you believe this because it vaguely makes sense- the reason given, ironically, is ‘to stop tourists getting ripped off’. You book your extortionately priced trip, but agree to pay on the next day. Tuk-tuk man gets his petrol. He stays around this time though, takes your mobile number. You go home and check the website: It looks legitimate. You google it: it seems fine. The next day Mr Tuk calls you. He says he’s outside your hostel and waiting to take you to the agency. You don’t want to be rude, so you go and pay. Later you find the same trip for £200 cheaper in a shop window. Not so friendly to the backpacker budget after all.

Our story ends differently. We ignore the call from Dom. He waits outside our hostel but we’re not in – we’re safely down the next road in a different hostel. When he dropped us off the night before we made sure he dropped us off at the wrong place; He came back every morning for the next three days. We may have outsmarted him, but in the end it is depressing to realise that the Tuk-Tuk drivers have no other choice. The bad press from scams being blown out in the open have greatly diminished their business and has meant that often it is no longer viable for them to tuk honestly.

Tourism and greed has changed what was once a relatively respectable trade into a murky job filled with lies and fake smiles. But hey, what am I complaining for? I did get a tour of Bangkok for 10p.

Turmoil on Varsity Ski Trip

0

This year’s Varsity trip was blighted by a host of problems with transport, accommodation and social events.

Some coaches en route to the destination in the Alpine resort of Tignes reportedly ended up at the wrong town, while other buses missed their ferry and had to wait in Dover.

Once in the resort, students reported problems with rooms, cloakrooms running out of space, sporadic hot water, and the cancelling of shopping trips.

The travel agency organising the trip told 180 students that they would not be able to access their rooms due to ‘refurbishment’. They were eventually put in new rooms, often without the friends they had arranged to stay with, some of which were located across town from the rest of the Oxbridge group.

One St Hilda’s student claimed that “we didn’t get into our room for six hours” and that they did not know what was happening. They said that “the committee were apologetic, but they didn’t know what to do.”

Several of the coaches making the half-day road trip from London arrived in the wrong town, due to a driver typing the wrong place name into his satellite navigation system. Instead of travelling via Bourg-Saint-Maurice, on the intended route to Tignes, several coaches arrived at Bourg-en-Bresse, a town almost 300 kilometres away.

Three coaches from London missed their ferry crossing to France, meaning students had to wait in Dover.

One Oriel student reported that “the coat check was shut down at the opening night,” which was “a big risk in terms of safety as a lot of people … came without jackets.” He said that trip organisers constantly stress the importance of taking jackets after a student died on a similar ski trip two years ago.

Sam Kirsop, Logistics Director of the trip, said that while although the problems with accommodation were unfortunate, they were not the trip committee’s fault.

“Unfortunately a French accommodation agency cancelled 25 rooms at the eleventh hour, completely out of the control of the Varsity Trip Committee and Event Travel Company. The vast majority of our 2,500 participants remained unaffected. Whilst this was frustrating for those involved, we had made it clear in all previous communication with participants that room allocations were provisional,” Kirsop said.  

“The committee phoned all those rooms affected by the changes to inform participants and find out their preferences for reallocation. Moreover, all participants were reallocated with room mates from their initial allocation and within the small resort of Tignes Val Claret, no more than a 3 minute walk to the slopes from any apartment block,” the Director said. 

Laura Abram, from the ski committee, told the Cambridge Tab newspaper that “Everyone on the committee worked very hard to sort the problem out.”

2,500 people from Oxford and Cambridge attended the 87th Varsity Trip this year, making it the world’s largest student snow sports trip. Most of these people paid £329 for the 7 day package, not including extras such as ski hire or lessons.

 

Review: James Methven’s ‘Precious Asses’

0

If Catullus was ever out of fashion, he is back with a foulmouthed vengeance. Ever since Ariane Gordji was left ‘shocked and confused’ after reading ‘pedicabo vos, et irrumabo vos’ in an email from hedge fund manager Mark Lowe – whether she was more appalled by his bad language or by his bad Latin is unclear – Catullus has been reveling in the limelight. An apologia from Mary Beard, typical ‘shockedandappalled’ anti-elitism from the Daily Mail (‘the literary equivalent of glassing in a pub-fight’) and fumbling nostalgic Classicism from the Telegraph: all grist to the poet’s mill.

But what does he mean when he writes ‘I will bugger you and fuck you in the face’, and why do we care? Because, and there is no getting around it, that is what the Latin says. There are three answers to this question, each corresponding to a different Catullus; and the answer the twenty-first century chooses may come to define it as a poetic era.

The first Catullus is a kind of Young British Artist: a poet of the toilet door, master of the obscene, a writer who farts at literary champagne receptions and savours the odour like a brandy connoisseur. This man is just downright rude: he uses vulgarity, as he tells us, ‘to arouse what tickles, and I don’t mean in little boys, but in those hairy men who can scarce stir their hard limbs.’

James Methven, however, would have us take a more sympathetic view. His Catullus – our second Catullus – is a man of tender passions, of mordant wit, and above all of satirical playfulness. He uses obscenity to give his poetry vigour and charm; and Oriel don Methven’s first volume of poetry Precious Asses, winner of the 2009 Purple Moose Prize, breathes with this spirit. The poems in this book play coquettish games with the Latin originals, all roaming hands and fumbling kisses, resulting in something that is not quite translation and not quite original verse. What it is is fun. Lots of fun. Methven picks up Catullus and bounces along with him, until the famous line about sphincters and mouths comes out: ‘As I said. Arse. Then Mouth. Both of you. Enjoy.’

These poems are (mostly) quite readable without a copy of Catullus to hand; so independent is the poet’s soul. Playing with poem 15, where Catullus brings down dire imprecations upon his friend’s head should he fail to look after a pretty boy, we have ‘For Your Eyes Only’, a poem that could have been born in a room over Oriel’s main quad:

‘…should the two of you pop out
To the pool, say, or for some food, or – wince – a club, keep him safe,
Watch out for the lads who strut the High, the Broad, Carfax and the Turl…’

Methven banters away in this vein for a few more lines, then, in a very Catullan sea-change, raves:

‘…Now,
Should your cock-crazed sphincter-sick bum-sex-obsessed mentality
Goad you to pull off the greatest crime of all – betrayal –
Here’s my warning fairly given: I’ll stake you in the quad, for all to see
Face-down, arms bound, and legs stretched wide wide wide apart
It’ll be time for your arse-hole to say, ‘Hello!’ to Mr Radish and Mr Mullet-Fin.’

A reader familiar with the Latin will see that Methven’s instinct is to expand and vivify the most striking nuance of the verse, often at the expense of the more poetic and formal registers. It is not that Methven-Catullus becomes monotonous – on the contrary, he shows himself sensitive and tender in adapting Catullus’ adaptation of Sappho in the excellent Obsession – but rather that he does not hit all the spots that the Roman Catullus does. His avatar of the poet sings the blues beautifully – This Year’s Crop of Kisses, inspired by poem 48, belongs in a smoky New Orleans bar – but rarely follows the Latin into its loftier reaches. Methven’s Catullus sounds like nothing quite so much as Nick Cave.

Another obvious aspect of the poetry lost in this translation is its metre. This is more understandable: it is a long, long time since experiments like Tennyson’s ‘Oh you chorus of indolent reviewers’ were fashionable. Yet where Tennyson and a hundred versifiers like him missed the rampant fun of Catullus, Methven misses his ingenuity and refinement. ‘Pedicabo ego vos et irrumabo’ is, like so many of Catullus’ shorter poems, written in a tremendously tricky metre called the hendecasyllable, and this is important: the poet is squeezing visceral invective into an intellectually demanding verse form. The raw feeling is broken up and polished, and then reassembled into lines that skim like stones over the surface of water. John Donne – recently voted the nation’s second favourite poet in a BBC poll – describes the process of writing in verse in these words:

‘I thought, if I could draw my pains
Through rhyme’s vexation, I should them allay.
Grief brought to numbers cannot be so fierce,
For he tames it, that fetters it in verse.’ [from The Triple Fool]

This third Catullus is a poet of supreme control, handling thought and emotion with the delicate tools of lyric metre, linguistic registers and literary allusion. And it is this focus, this intensity, this mastery, that could make Catullus relevant and interesting to the twenty-first century, and in turn make our generation relevant and interesting to the future.

Clever verse, if written with strength and vigour, is anything but dry: its feelings and attitudes are tempered, refined, given new degrees of subtlety. James Methven rants and raves and cries and swears and teases as well as Catullus himself, but he is missing Catullus’ hypnotic intelligence: an intelligence that will never go out of style.