Monday 30th June 2025
Blog Page 2083

Barclay banks OUSU Presidency

0

David Barclay was elected the President of Oxford University Student Union following a closely fought campaign.

1712 people voted for Barclay, whilst Jake Leeper gathered 1133 votes. 123 people wanted to re-open the nomination.

2968 people voted in the election, just 15% of those eligible. The turn out was down 22% on last year’s election.

Other candidates on Barclay’s slate to be elected were Alex Bulfin, VP Access and Academic Affairs and Katharine Terrell, VP Women. VP Charities and Communities went to the independent candidate Daniel Lowe and Tom Perry will be the next VP welfare.

All the unopposed candidates were elected.

David Barclay said, “I feel fantastic. I think [what swung] it was the team that we had. We had an incredibly diverse group of people across Oxford working incredibly hard for us and it was only through their efforts that we managed to get people turned out and to get people excited.

“The next step is to remember that I have a degree. I have a meeting at 9.15 tomorrow to talk about my thesis. But once that is sorted out the next step is to work hard this year obviously to survive my degree and then start thinking about what we can do next year.”

Barclay, who campaigned under the slogan, “Making Oxford work for students”, pledged to create a university-wide discount card, establish a housing fair in the town hall, and lobby the university for new OUSU headquarters in central Oxford.

Katharine Terrell, VP for Women-elect said, “I feel really happy. Still a bit weirded out, it doesn’t feel quite real. Absolutely looking forward to getting stuck into the job. I’m just going to talk to a lot of people and make sure I know what I’m doing next year. I’m really excited.”

Daniel Lowe said of his election for VP Charities and Communities, “I’m incredibly happy that I managed to get elected when I had no campaign team and I had some very, very committed activists. I had no campaign manager, I’ve never run a contested election before, I’m incredibly shocked I managed to win.”

The two-week campaign was marred by a series of fines imposed by the returning officer Oliver Linch for breaches of OUSU campaign rules. Jake Leeper’s campaign was fined eleven times and was ordered to pay a total of £82.25, including one fine of £10 for unauthorised election material. The Barclay campaign received three fines, amounting to £7.95. In one case, Barclay’s team was forced to pay a penalty of £2.50 after Barclay’s girlfriend, a Durham University student, posted a Facebook status urging people to vote for her boyfriend.

The “Another Education Is Possible” slate faced a delay in launching their campaign after difficulties with poster printing. There was some confusion with stamping the posters, but Ben Kindler, candidate for International Students Officer said he felt his campaign was unaffected but the hold-up.

Though both Presidential candidates campaigned under the promise to make OUSU relevant to the student body, Barclay has a big task to make this a reality.

A Christ Church first year said she had no idea about what OUSU does. “I don’t know what OUSU actually does for me individually, I don’t know enough about the people involved. I could find out, but it’s not pinned up in front of my face.”

A Hertford student added, “It’s quite important that we get represented to the NUS because that’s our main body, especially because of tuition fees going up, we need someone or some people to look after our interests. People aren’t interested because of the press it gets that it’s inefficient and doesn’t really do anything, but if that changed people would be interested.

“Hertford recently voted to stay affiliated by quite a large margin so people want it to be better and really want to get involved.”

Another student said, “It’s important that they’re a student governing body that represents who we are and protects basic rights of students to improve the standard of living.”

One St Catz first year added, “I’ve not had much experience with OUSU and our JCR Committee seem to do everything for us. OUSU is not that present in our daily lives I guess. I don’t even know what they are responsible for.”

Hertford’s husts were cancelled due to lack of interest.

Sarah Burton, OUSU rep at Herford said, “I think this reflects the general indifference towards OUSU at Hertford at the moment. In a JCR meeting a week ago we came very close to disaffiliating. As OUSU rep for the last year I have been aware that Hertford JCR feels very disconnected to OUSU and has no idea, or little interest in, what they actually do.”

However, many students interviewed by Cherwell felt that OUSU had an important role to play, but hadn’t yet filled its potential. One student commented, “I think the elections are quite important, but obviously there are a lot of problems with OUSU and it’s not representing the students as well as it should.”

Lukas Wallrich at Merton added, “I think engaging students more into OUSU affairs should be a core task of those newly elected – including all OUSU reps.”

 

Not so serious men

0

You might not be able to tell from her roles in Fargo and Burn After Reading, but Frances McDormand is a fox. I caught her on my way into the Claridges Hotel, where we shared a profound, if fleeting, connection during our brief waltz through the revolving door. I was about to join 15 or so other young, bushy-tailed journalists for a 20-minute round-table interview with her husband, Joel Coen, and brother-inlaw, Ethan Coen, about their hilarious and devastating new film, A Serious Man.

My peers and I were served finger sandwiches and coffee while waiting to speak to the duo, who are quite arguably the most original and prolific filmmakers in the movie industry today. I nibbled my miniature cucumber and egg salad sandwich as I debated which of my questions (because I might only get to ask one) would enable me all at once to: 1) learn the secrets to success in the film industry – not because I intend to actually enter the industry, but just because it would be cool to know, 2) be appreciated as a thoughtful and intelligent interviewer, 3) learn whether the Coen brothers are, in fact, as nihilistic and inscrutable as their movies are, and 4) what, if anything, they have against physicists.

Joel David Coen and Ethan Jesse Coen grew up in the Minneapolis suburb of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, in a community very similar to the one depicted in A Serious Man. Their father was an economics professor at the University of Minnesota and their mother taught art history at St. Cloud State University. Asked to what extent A Serious Man draws on their own lives, Joel responds, ‘It’s not really autobiographical because the story is made up.

But consciously we sought to recreate the community that we grew up in. There are a lot of similarities to our own background there: we went to Hebrew school, we were bar mitzvah’ed, our father was an academic, a professor at a midwestern university, we grew up in a house like that, in a neighbourhood like that.’ As to whether any of the characters in the film are taken from their own upbringing, Joel notes, ‘the character that Michael Stuhlbarg plays in the film is not anything like our father; he couldn’t be more different in many ways. ’

Ethan adds, ‘Aaron [Wolff]’s character is probably a pretty typical kid of that environment and probably we were too; not particularly like him, but a part of that time and place.’ Possibly the only directors apart from Woody Allen who can work with actors like Brad Pitt and George Clooney without worrying too much about the commercial viability of their films, they explain that they chose not to cast any stars in A Serious Man because ‘It would diminish the feeling of “here we are in the everyday reality of this suburban Jewish community in 1967”.

One doesn’t expect George Clooney to show up there.’ However, after a moment’s wistful reflection, Ethan mutters sheepishly, ‘I’m not saying… maybe I wanted George Clooney to be there a little bit.’ Joel laughs, and they exchange an inside joke that none of us get. Given the Coen brothers’ dark, sometimes cryptic sense of irony, it’s easy to think when you’ve seen the film that the phrase ‘a serious man’ is intended mockingly. However, Joel clarifies, ‘It’s a little ambiguous even in our own minds.

It’s even ambiguous in terms of who it’s supposed to be referring to. In our minds it’s referring both to the Sy Abelman character who’s called a serious man in the movie and Larry who kind of aspires to whatever stature that implies. But no, it’s not meant to be – maybe there’s some irony in it, but it’s not meant to take the piss out of him really.’ Like some of the Coen Brothers’ earlier films – most recently, No Country for Old Men – A Serious Man depicts with stark indifference the cruel arbitrariness of the human condition.

When asked to what extent this is meant to be a running theme throughout their work, or at least in No Country… and A Serious Man, Joel responds, ‘I mean it’s interesting… they both kind of have that element… it must be at some level interesting to us.’ And that’s all we’re getting on that. The protagonist of A Serious Man, Larry Gopnik, is a physicist whose life, while in some sense devoted to the search for order in the universe, begins to unravel as a result of seemingly unpredictable events beyond his control.

Joel elaborates on their reasons for choosing Larry to be a physics professor: ‘We thought it was more interesting to make him a scientist and that way of looking at the world and that sort of rationality was up against… in the face of the things that are happening to him – that he’s looking to spiritual leaders for answers for the things he’s going through was sort of interesting to us. And it was interesting to us that mathematicians and the more mystical parts of the Judaic tradition try to make sense of the world through numbers.’

Throughout their long career, which began with 1984’s Blood Simple, the Coen Brothers have repeatedly been called nihilistic, misanthropic and deliberately inscrutable. Their surprise when we ask them how they respond to critics who use some of these adjectives to describe their latest film comes as something of a shock. Joel: ‘Nihilistic?’ Ethan: ‘Well, I don’t know why you call it misanthropic. It’s about a character who’s looking for some kind of meaning and he’s getting repeatedly stymied in that quest, but you know, that’s the story. The character doesn’t achieve any kind of clarity or get a grasp on any kind of meaning that’s satisfying for him, but I don’t know, that just seemed like the story we were telling as opposed to an expression of a larger point of view that we have ourselves.’

Aware of the frustration that past interviewers have sometimes felt in attempting to extract a message from their work, we asked them whether the characters’ failed searches for meaning and the unsettling ambiguities of the film’s ending were intended as a sort of rebuff to those who would attempt to ascribe broader significance to their work.

Ethan’s response? ‘No…no, really. I…no, I don’t think so. I mean, no…no, it’s a…yeah.’ It’s complicated, apparently. We moved to the lighter subject of their working relationship and methodology. Given that they’ve lately been producing movies at the rate of one a year, often writing the screenplays as well, do they sit down every day and write two to three thousand words? Joel: ‘Oh, shit no.’

Ethan: ‘You know it’s funny. It feels to us like we’re fairly lazy and yet relative to other people we do seem to get a fair amount done but that just seems to reflect poorly on other people as opposed to well on ourselves.’ ‘You know, what are they all doing?’ Joel interjects, laughing. Ethan: ‘We get very little accomplished and yet we’re outpacing many of our peers… it seems odd to me… When we were younger we did spend more time doing it – production even more than in writing. Longer days, six to eight weeks. We haven’t done six to eight weeks in ages, in terms of shooting weeks.’

Joel: ‘We would work longer in the editing room.’ He looks over to Ethan and they laugh, as if Ethan already knows what he’s going to say. ‘It’s so prosaic. As we get older, we like to go home and spend time with our kids..’ Good thing that, like most people, they reserve their nihilism for their day job.

Union in committee controversy

0

Ash Sangha, The Oxford Union Treasurer- Elect, has narrowly avoided forced resignation of his position. His response has prompted investigation into two serious governance issues within the Union.

Firstly, the Union is investigating a “disparity” in Consultative Committee meeting minutes, which some suspect may be the result of foul play. The minutes of the 3rd Week Consultative Committee meeting were allegedly altered between the meeting itself and their ratification.

A second enquiry surrounds the validity of Standing Committee meetings. These are believed to have been improperly called, thus calling into question all motions passed at the meetings. These investigations have been brought to light as Ash Sangha, Union Treasurer-Elect, was deemed to have resigned due to his absence from too many meetings.

Union rules stipulate that if three ordinary meetings of any Committee are missed the member is deemed to have resigned their position. Sangha has been absent from three Consultative Committee meetings and three Standing Committee meetings this term.

When his absences from Consultative Committee were investigated it became apparent that there was a disparity between the original minutes which highlighted that his nonattendance was extraordinary, and those that were ratified, where his absence was noted as “not extraordinary”.

The minutes were altered after the Secretary of the Committee, Adi Balachander, passed them to the new Chair. James Dray, Union President commented, “I am currently investigating this issue, which may well be one of the worst cases of fraud to prevent an officer from continuing in his role that the Union has ever seen. If it is proven that anyone deliberately changed the minutes this will be taken to the highest disciplinary committee of the Union.”

In a further development, his absence at three Standing Committees was excused as he demonstrated that the meetings were improperly called by the Secretary, Lou Stoppard. Meetings are supposed to be called by email by the Secretary with at least 48 hours notice, and none of the three were.

As a result, the authenticity of these Standing Committee meetings has been called into question. This has potentially serious consequences for all motions passed in the meetings this term, which includes some large budgetary decisions. A number of members have been angered by the decision to allow Sangha to retain his position over a technicality.

However, Dray has noted that Sangha missed two meetings in order to fulfil his role as Treasurer- Elect, as he was delivering termcards and helping to host the President of Ecuador, and that these were excusable absences. Ash Sangha has been denied the opportunity to comment by the Union.

One concerned member of Standing Committee commented, “This emphasizes that the major problems of Standing Committee are incompetence and inexperience. A number of members are very angry and concerned at the potentially jeopardised situation this has left the Union in.”

Interview: Richard Curtis

0

Richard Curtis has made millions, and raised millions, by making us laugh. His credits roll on and on, from Blackadder and The Vicar of Dibley, to Four Weddings and a Funeral, Notting Hill, Love Actually and, most recently, The Boat that Rocked. Curtis has won a BAFTA, an Emmy, and has been nominated for an Oscar. He founded Comic Relief. It is fair to say that he is no underachiever, and whilst he may not be the darling of the British film industry (critics tend to sneer at his optimism, and ‘improbable’ films) even the most cynical and cold-hearted of us will probably have spent a few hours on the sofa chortling at something that Curtis has put his hand to.

Curtis was born in New Zealand but has lived in England since he was eleven, and attended Christ Church, Oxford to study English. I ask him about his student days, and how he would best sum them up. ‘I started off working hard in the first term, and then realized that didn’t seem to be strictly necessary.’ A typical Oxford student then? ‘I had a very good time, just with friends enjoying myself. I made most of my best friends for life.’ These friends include Rowan Atkinson, who Curtis has had a flourishing work relationship as well as friendship with ever since.

It is, in fact, Atkinson that we have to thank for Curtis turning his hand to writing, who arrived at Oxford with thespian dreams that he found quickly shattered. ‘I had been, as far as I could tell, the star actor at school and so I arrived expecting to be an actor – or, at least, that’s what I wanted to do. And I instantly discovered I couldn’t get cast as anything other than [the clown]. All the good parts went to dark-haired guys with pointy chins.’ So, Curtis began writing instead. ‘I realized that the only way I could act on stage was to write stuff for myself- and that’s how I fell into writing. I would have been a writer/performer, probably, but then I met Rowan who was just so blazingly brilliant that it was pointless competing.’

‘All the good parts went to dark-haired guys with pointy chins.’

And the rest of his time here? ‘I fell in love, and that dominated my second year; and then I got heartbroken and that dominated the next year, entirely. I did a lot of work in the end, simply so I could hide from my heartbreak.’ It sounds almost like the plot of one of his films, the days that Curtis says were the days of ‘friendship, laughter, heartbreak… and some work.’ What would he do differently is he could? ‘That is such a complicated question, because maybe if I hadn’t gone out with that particular girl then I would have been happier but, on the other hand, I don’t think I would have written all the films that I then wrote to, as it were, put life right’.

It is something we see in Curtis’ early films, labelled quite dismissively as “rom-coms”- a term with all its implications of light-hearted, predictability. But Curtis’ films, if you look deeper, have a slightly darker edge, particularly Four Weddings and a Funeral which actually started off life as the much more cheerily titled Four Weddings and a Honeymoon. Curtis wrote these films ‘because of getting my heart broken at Oxford. I had at least fifteen years of making love affairs turn out right, to try and make up for what happened outside Magdalen College. I saw Five Hundred Days of Summer a few weeks ago, and that is absolutely the type of the film I wished I’d written at twenty six, the perfect description of what happened to me at Oxford… that girl you couldn’t get to love you quite enough.’

The girl in question is, reportedly, Ann Jenkins who is said to have left Curtis for Bernard Jenkins, now MP for North Essex. This is also reportedly to explain why much of Curtis’ work contains a character called Bernard – mostly bumbling or ridiculous, like the Bernard of Four Weddings whose loud sex noises with new wife Lydia Hugh Grant is forced to endure.

 

The “rom-com” label is perhaps one that Curtis will never shake off, although he maintains it was never his intention. ‘Even though people think [my films] are ‘all the same’, when I wrote Four Weddings I didn’t know what a “rom-com” was- it wasn’t like it is now, a form which every young actor has done three of. I thought I was writing an idiosyncratic, autobiographical film about a group of friends, with a bit of love in it… but it transpired it was a textbook romantic film. Then I did write a textbook romantic film with Notting Hill, but then it was because I wanted to; I’d always wanted to turn up at a friend’s house with Madonna. Then Love Actually was a kind of joke with myself, trying to write ten of them at once. Tonally, I realise, it’s a bit uneven, some of the stories don’t exist in the same world, but I think that was inherent in what I was doing, and I don’t think I could have changed it.’

Much to the disappointment of women all round the world, Curtis doesn’t think he’ll return to his much loved film formula. The Girl in the Café, a film Curtis did for HBO, shows him letting go and moving towards more important issues, namely what was at the time the impending G8 summit. ‘I think you should only write about what you’re interested in, and the truth of the matter is that by the time I was writing Love Actually, I was starting to lose interest in boy meets girl for the first time and falls in love – a film about that, now, I would not be terribly interested in.’ The Boat that Rocked, Curtis’s latest film, is about friendship and the love, not of a pretty but slightly suspect American or a rogue film star, but of pop music – a long term love of Richard Curtis. ‘It’s the second most important thing in my life, it cheers me up at the beginning of every single day.’

So what will he write? The creator of The Vicar of Dibley and the much loved Blackadder, Curtis hopes that ‘one day I’ll do one more funny TV show. After I finish a film I normally start three of four different things, and then see which one means the most to me, at the movement I’m in the middle of that phase’.

But there is more to Curtis than funny films, and work is not the only thing that means a lot to him. Curtis was a founder of both Comic Relief and Make Poverty History. He helped Bob Geldof to organise Live 8 in 2005. ‘I’m still heavily involved in the Red Nose Day stuff, and I’m extremely interested in how the Make Poverty History campaign will play out over the next ten years – there are big, serious things there and there is real progress on those fronts, the battle against polio and malaria particularly. Comic Relief has spent its money unbelievably well, but clearly there are huge amounts to do – that just makes me more determined’.

It is the sign of a genuinely nice guy, that Curtis, despite being romantic comedy royalty, still makes a huge amount of time for his charitable efforts, and still retains his optimism that a real difference can be made. ‘I tend to think that life is full of good things and bad things, and the good things don’t necessarily cancel out the bad things, but neither do the bad cancel out the good. I’m getting more bullish about believing that it’s good to be optimistic.’

Whether his films are to your taste or not, whether you watch Comic Relief cynically or with the belief that it really does good, Curtis proves that a little happiness and light never hurt anyone.

 

A year abroad: Damascus

0

We arrived in Damascus during ‘Eid al-fitr, a weekend of celebrations to mark the end of Ramadan, the month of fasting. The streets of the Old City were crammed, and we wove our way through groups of tourists, who descend on Damascus in their coach loads from the Gulf and Iran. Amongst the hordes of tourists parades of Syrian school boys pushed their way cockily through the crowds, many armed with toy guns, gifts from relatives given during the long weekend of family visits, shared meals and parties.

One group of boys seemed particularly intrigued by us, the only westerners and in my case, the only person wearing shorts. I have never felt so foreign in my life and when we were approached outside the Umayyad Mosque, by a modestly dressed young woman requesting a photo, I realised that it was perhaps as rare for her to see a woman’s knees in public as it was for her to visit the Mosque; 4000 miles from our own home and we were the tourist attraction.

It was an intense introduction to the country and not greatly representative of Syrian daily life. When the bank holiday tourists had departed and people went back to work, we were able to find ourselves a home and settle into life. This was not without its challenges, particularly communicating with our neighbours. After a year of studying Modern Standard Arabic not one of us spoke more than a line of the local dialect and we soon found that our year of hard study was less use to us in the local shops than the ability to point, nod and smile. However, out of necessity, we quickly picked up enough of the language to go about our daily business and begin to feel part of the local community.

One of the most striking things about Damascus is the complicated, often confused, fusion of Eastern and Western cultures. In cafes, it is a common site to see a group of immaculately dressed young Syrian women, wearing slim-fitting western dress, complete with hijab and jewelencrusted sunglasses. Western popular culture has clearly made a great impression upon the country’s youth population, with many young people learn English through watching American films and music channels.

As such, general perceptions of the West are perhaps as s k e w e d as the West’s view of Syria as a land of camels and terrorists. Yet, the idolisation of western culture on the part of many young Syrians is perhaps a symptom of a more serious problem than a dubious partiality for American gangster rap. Following decades of stifling censorship, the country is severely suffering from a “brain drain”, as the country’s intelligent and skilled middle class continue to depart for the West in search of better paid work and greater freedom of expression.

Yet, despite its problems, Syrians continue to live up to their reputation as some of the friendliest and welcom- ing of the region. Damascus is a quirky and energetic city and an exciting place to be a student.

Teaching in the wilderness

0

Under the dappled sunshine of a July morning in the grounds of a Russian orphanage surrounded by excited kids, bored carers and distracted volunteers I was talking to Sasha. A tall, quiet seventeen year old with ears that stick out, Sasha loves history and was softly quizzing me about late Roman emperors. In the atmosphere of barely restrained chaos – like the anarchic buzz of an assembly before the teachers get there – I was only half-listening. As another boy hung off my arm and one of the girls manoeuvred into a position from where she would be able to ambush me, Sasha was telling me about Constantine and his conversion to Christianity.

I couldn’t make out exactly what he was talking about so he knelt down and drew something in the sandy earth. It took a few moments for the penny to drop and memories of a half-forgotten tutorial came suddenly flooding back. He had drawn the Chi-Rho symbol, the piece of early Christian iconography Constantine is supposed to have had his soldiers paint on their shields before doing battle in 312. The incongruity was absurd. A few moments later Sasha was happily yelling out our group’s name: ‘Who are we? We’re Pirates!’

Sasha is one of the 63 kids aged between 7 and 18 who live at the Belskoye Ustye psycho-neurological orphanage in western Russia, a twelve hour train journey from Moscow and a few hundred kilometres from the Latvian border. Hidden away in a small village amidst rolling green countryside where the attendants in the sole shop use an abacus and horse drawn carts share the unpaved roads with dented old Ladas, the orphanage is one of 143 such institutions in Russia.

All the children have diagnoses of mental or physical disability although the severity of the disabilities varies widely. Once they ‘graduate’ from the orphanage aged 18 most will end up in ‘adult institutions’: the establishments the Russian state uses to care for its citizens who are unable to live independently – the very old, the institutionalised and the mentally ill.

Every July since 2000, under the aegis of a charity called the Russian Orphan Opportunity Fund (ROOF), between 20 and 25 volunteers from Russia and Europe have run a 4 week summer camp for the kids. Mainly students, volunteers come from Moscow, St Petersburg, the Ukraine, France, Italy and Britain. Those from Britain are mostly Oxford Russian students.

For one month each year the sleepy quiet of the village is disturbed, the shop is chronically short of sweets and bottled water and, if you seek it out, you can hear conversations about tutors and the latest gossip from colleges a thousand miles away. Volunteers live together in one of three houses several kilometres from the orphanage. The electricity is sporadic, there is no running water and a shortage of beds. Some sleep in tents for a month.

The scattered pieces of forest are full of blueberries, raspberries and strawberries in the summer but the countryside is also infested with mosquitoes. In the evening at the house where volunteers are based the smell of DEET hangs in the air as people desperately fortify themselves against attack. The more sensitive foreigners quickly acquire swollen limbs and the sound of scratching, nails on skin, is constant.

‘It’s a complete culture shock when you first arrive’ says Ashley Sherman, a fourth year linguist, ‘it’s a completely different Russia from Moscow or St Petersburg’. Some people find the unashamedly basic food hard to bear, for others it is the lack of washing facilities. Ashley favours the local river: ‘there’s a tarzan-swing there which I used every morning to get myself into that cold water!’ he says with some pride. Others partake of the weekly wood-burning sauna; the Russian banya. ‘After you’ve been in there naked, sweated for twenty minutes and beaten your partner with birch twigs you feel like a new man’ gushes Nat Gordon, another volunteer.

150 years ago the small hamlet where the volunteers stay was a village for the priests and other officials who ran the large Orthodox church in Belskoye Ustye (now in ruins after its destruction in the Second World War). Every day, come sun or snow, the priests would walk the 15 minutes or so to their place of work. Now, however, in the footsteps of their religious predecessors, it is the volunteers who do the twice-daily journey up the same road to the orphanage.

Each volunteer is paired with two groups of children with whom they work every day, six days a week. Daily tasks range from games like snap, pairs and twister to toy boat making, big collages, rounders and tag. Usually at least two days are week are themed ‘festival days’ where volunteers put on a show for the kids or set up a circuit of school fete type challenges. Weekly discos (think open air bops with overexcited children and pounding Russian pop but without alcohol), camping trips and treasure hunts also vary the diet of daily activities. With limited materials, ideas for a month’s worth of entertainment are sometimes difficult to come by – ‘summer camp is a challenge’ says Ashley, ‘the children can be very tough to work with.’

Failure to take sufficient account of the range of abilities and ages amongst the children can be crushing. One festival day – ‘Day of Nature’ I was dressed up as a wolf and hiding in the woods as groups of children came by to collect clues. Jumping out and giving my best blood-curdling howl I was faced by an unimpressed group of the oldest girls in the orphanage. ‘Who am I?’ I barked. Silence. Then Tonya, one of the girls at the back, piped up with an undisguised note of disappointment in her voice: ‘An idiot.’ A fair point well made.

Volunteers are often shocked by the conditions in which the children live at the orphanage. They are still locked behind rusting metal grilles, sent to the local mental hospital as a punishment for bad behaviour and receive only a very basic education (many are illiterate). Institutionalisation affects all of the kids and a large minority express this physically through rocking and other nervous tics. Conditions, however, have improved since the chaos and disintegration of the 1990s. The orphanage psychologist, Tatiana Kapustina, who first visited in 2000 recalls that, back then, ‘the children were in rags, dirty and covered in piss… they climbed up into your face, hung off people, and stole everything’.

Today material conditions are no longer such an issue and the emphasis has shifted to reducing the number of children who leave the orphanage to go on to ‘adult institutions’ where life expectancies are low, levels of drug and alcohol abuse very high and the opportunities for enjoyment, education or work negligible. There are now several ‘half-way’ houses in the local town where orphanage ‘graduates’ can live and learn skills like cooking, money management and holding down a job whilst under the eye of a supervisor. Elaborate games like ‘Day of Shopping’ during summer camp when kids make ‘money’ doing tasks and then spend what they earn in volunteer-run shops are also a nod towards this preparation for independent living.

Local government is working towards a system of social care based on fostering and multi-purpose rehabilitation centres. ‘The ideal, of course,’ says Marina Kirilova, Head of the Regional Department for Families, Women, Children and Demography, ‘is that this institution [the Belskoye Ustye orphanage] be closed down. Completely.’ She believes all institutions in the region can be shut within 5 years – an aspiration which flies spectacularly in the face of change on the ground. Whatever the plans of the authorities, however, summer camp will not be a tradition that ends in the foreseeable future. It will continue to forge unlikely – and lasting – friendships between a disparate group of Europeans, the orphanage kids and their carers in a rural backwater of western Russia.

 

Unfriend the word of the year

0

Unfriend is the word of the year 2009 according to the the New Oxford American Dictionary.

This is the first internet-inspired term to receive the title. The Oxford University Press Blog defines the verb as “to remove someone as a friend on a social networking site such as Facebook.”

“It has both currency and potential longevity,” says Christine Lindberg, Senior Lexicographer for Oxford’s US dictionary program. “Unfriend has real lex-appeal.”

Other words considered for the title were hashtag, sexting, funemployed and deleb.

Will Granger, first year Modern Languages student at St Hugh’s commented, “I have never heard anyone use the word ‘unfriend’ in ordinary conversation.”

 

Tales of a World Cup hero

After 43 years of hurt the national football team has quite a weight on its shoulders; looking ahead to the summer in South Africa, we talk to a living legend, Sir Geoff Hurst, our hat-trick hero of ’66.

Hurst speaks to us of the changing nature of respect within the game, looking at the structure of the wage system, and about his continuing involvement in the beautiful game.

More than ever England supporters are searching for a player to step up, like Geoff did all those years ago. Only 8 games into his international career, he found himself replacing the injured Jimmy Greaves in the Quarterfinal game against Argentina. He quickly cemented a partnership with the prolific striker Roger Hunt and went on to play the remaining games of the tournament. Despite Greaves returning to fitness in time for the West Germany Final, the enigmatic manager, Ramsay, put faith in the relatively inexperienced Hurst. That faith was emphatically rewarded with the only World cup final hat-trick in footballing history.

Looking ahead to the summer, we quizzed Sir Geoff over his views on the potential of the squad, individual players and manager.
C: Sir Geoff, what are your views on Capello? Do you believe he’s the right man for the job?

SGH: Capello is definitely the right guy; there is no question about that, right from the moment he took the job. He has proved to be a tremendous success.
C: What do you think of him being a non-English manager?

SGH: In an ideal world English people would like an English manager, but football these days is a global game and to an extent it was so in my day, and you want the best person possible for the job. The previous manager, in my opinion, didn’t do a very good job. I think this guy’s CV is fantastic; he’s done it as a player, as a manager of a big club with big players. But if we win the world cup we won’t give a monkey’s whatever…it’s 11 English guys winning the World Cup.

C: Where do you think it’s going wrong?

The problem is we don’t have enough English managers working at the top level at the best clubs in the Premier League. You need that graduation as a player or a manager at the top half of the league going on and developing to become the national manager.

C: In what way do you think Capello has changed the side?

There’s been a huge change in the attitudes and discipline of the players in the squad. The respect is there, there has been a lot more discipline in the squad and that is the big thing. At least we know the team are going to be prepared well.

The structure of the sport has changed dramatically since the professional era took off in the ‘90s.  Referees undoubtedly take a lot more abuse these days, with the excitement of the game often taking precedent over fair play. In Hurst’s opinion this stems from the context of today’s culture; a culture of little respect, starting from school and leading into sport. He spoke of how the diving and conning of the referee has significantly infiltrated the game, supporting the potential introduction of technology into the officiating of matches; given it doesn’t interfere with the speed or excitement of the game.

The astronomical wage payments dished out to the top players are in his eyes well deserved as they are ‘going rate’, however when comparing his substantial pay packet of £140 a week with that of Frank Lampard’s paltry £140,000, there has obviously been an exponential rise of money going into the game. The problem he notes with the huge influx of wages is that a large host of average players are being paid an extortionate amount, for playing mediocre football. A rising tide floats all boats.

After his successful playing career, Hurst briefly remained in football, managing Chelsea. Hurst later moved into the business world of insurance, only semi-retiring in 2002-a career for some reason it’s hard to imagine Rooney slotting into with such ease! For retiring players after a short intense professional career, often lasting no more than 10 years they have a lot more opportunities than in his day. Many of the top players have the choice of moving into a managerial role, taking part in the media circus that surrounds the modern game, or even just retiring. This financial stability certainly did not feature within his day, and bears testament to how the global game of football has become ever more commercialised.

A busy man, he currently spends his time as the director of football for McDonalds, conducting after-dinner speaking and working hard within his role as President of the sporting charity Sparks. A national symbol, Hurst reminded us of the importance respect plays within the game, a noble attitude in tow and a desire to win might just take a so far underachieving England side to the finals. We can but dream!

Lets have a look at some of Geoff’s last minute predictions.
Varsity game- Unbiased, sitting here talking to you so Oxford.
Premiership- between Chelsea and Man Utd, I personally want Arsenal to win this year, I admire what Arsene Wenger has done, bringing young players through. If Chelsea keep their players fit, they will probably win, strong squad.

Champions league- Chelsea again but might be hard to do the two.

They think it’s all over… it is now.

The big question: Is the Oxford experience worth it?

0

Clearly there are some aspects of ‘the Oxford experience’ which are nice. Plenty of dreaming spires, picnic-friendly parks, quaint little bookshops, etc, etc. I’d would be hard to disagree that there are some interesting souls about to chat to, and some interesting places to go and look at. You never know, you may even leave with a degree and some semblance of employability. However, I don’t imagine I am alone in my habit of having had quite enough of Oxford usually by about 3rd week and – more cumulatively – certainly by third year! The following represents my views at the most bitter and homesick point in the term’s cycle…

There are those of us who try to cope with stringent academic demands by ignoring them as best we can, and getting involved with some time-consuming, life-eating, CV-boosting project, like acting, societies, media, etc. Whilst they seem like a good idea at the time, once you’re in a position worth having these invariably become such a commitment; with cycling everywhere, forgoing funner engagements to attend meetings, and innumerable panic-inducing missed calls from unrecognised numbers, that you wonder why you ever decided to stop reading books, writing essays and being a normal student in the first place.

But the ‘normal’ student (that is, those that do have a little of the appropriate respect for Oxford as an institution of learning, and didn’t give up their half-baked attempts at being studious after Michaelmas in first year) is hardly having a whale of a time, either.

Their best clothes are aired for five-days-a-week excursions to faculty/Bodleian Library where they delve into their ‘suggested’, ‘secondary’ or ‘further’ reading lists (‘Tutors give us these for a reason, right? They must be important, right?!’) and dream of two week’s time when the eve of their next permissible night out arrives. Outsiders might be baffled as to how one person can be so diligent. How can they bear it? What is all the hard work for? So they can go on to do more hard work, of course! This brand of student becomes so addicted to drudgery that their only option is to secure some tragically uninspired position as a cooperate-investment-lawyer-civil-banker-manager-service-hedge fund-city-type-person where they will be able to continue in their nose-to-the-grindstone habits. Except in exchange they’ll get top dolla (which means they’ll probably have to buy magazines for ideas on what to buy). That or an MA, obv.

Aside from all the cycling through the rain with a flat tire, on three hour’s sleep, to make a ‘tute’ where you plan on letting your partner do the talking only to find they have pig flu so you’ll just have to read out your excuse for an essay alone, or walking in the rain with hair curling, hands shivering and nose running, to the library to pay your debt of £34 in fines for books you didn’t even read only to find that it’s closed on weekends because, erm, this is supposed to be, like, the bestest, oldest most well-funded, super-dee-duper, researching, pioneering, genius-attracting university ever, but hey – money doesn’t grow on trees and even librarians need a day off!

Yes, aside from these motifs, there is no getting away from the fact that Oxford is full of awful people with ghastly clothes (think people so keen to flash their ‘country gentleman’ credentials that they wear shooting tweeds to the corner shop and end up looking like painfully try-hard twats, or young men and women who think combat trousers, or shoes incorporating Velcro are good plans). Of course, you do find roses amongst thorns, but ultimately the thousands of people with axes to grind and chips on their shoulders, people with [probably] small willies or whose mothers [probably] didn’t show any affection, and whose sole purpose in life is to show the world – whether or not they are even remotely interested – how completely, astonishingly clever they are, people who brandish their supposed intellect, ironically, as brutally as some prehistoric ape would wield his club. It is these trying and terrible people that have got me wondering where I can go, and what I can do after finals that is as far away from the cherished ‘Oxford experience’ as possible.

I love it really, though. Deep, deep, deep down.

 

Striking cross-college inequalities

0

Stark disparities in college wealth have led to concerns over the unequal provision for students across the University.

Published accounts show that annual income for the last recorded financial year 2007/08, varied between nearly £19 million at the top end of the range and just over £1.5 million at the lower end. The are also wide disparities in college endowment size, which range from between just under £6 million to over £300 million.

Christ Church topped the college income table for 2007/08, raking in £18.835 million. Below came St John’s (£15.726 million), followed by New (£11.697 million) and Magdalen (£10.875 million).

Harris Manchester College had the lowest income last year, at £1.648 million. Above came Mansfield (£3.475 million), Corpus Christi (£5.511 million) and St Hilda’s (£5.642 million).

A significant section of college income also comes the hosting of conferences and functions. St Catz, for example, made £2.064 million in this way last year, while St Anne’s made £1.888 million. Martin Jackson, Domestic Bursar at St Anne’s, explains that “this is a significant income stream and covers the current level of subsidy for student food and accommodation.”

Differences in endowment size are even more pronounced than income inequalities. Endowments are defined in college accounts as comprising “funds which are regarded as for the long term and which fundamentally underpin and sustain the operation of the College at its desired level of activity.” St John’s has the largest, at £300,321,000. Harris Manchester, on the other hand, has the smallest endowment, at only £5.964 million.

Questions have been raised about the difference membership of a rich college can make to students’ experiences while at Oxford. While lectures and exams are organised at a University level, college autonomy means that luckier students can enjoy cheaper food and rent, superior facilities and more intensive teaching opportunities.

Jonny Medland, OUSU VP for Access and Academic Affairs commented, “The wealth of colleges can have a great impact on the student experience here. Richer colleges can offer greater subsidies for rent, provide better facilities and offer higher levels of student support. Students should look at a range of factors before deciding which college to apply to, including what sort of atmosphere colleges have, and how they cater for the interests of individual students.

“Inequality of wealth across colleges can be tackled in a variety of ways. This includes purely financial mechanisms – money is currently transferred to less wealthy colleges every year. But it’s just as important that minimum standards are introduced across the university. It’s crucial that students are treated equally regardless of which college they attend, and this means greater co-ordination across colleges as to what they offer their students.”

Ben Lyons, Co-Chair of Oxford University Labour Club also believes that the difference in wealth between colleges is an issue. “I’m not sure it’s entirely down to college wealth but also how they choose to spend their money,” he said. “Some colleges hoard money, others invest it in access, others in strong JCRs.

“It’s right to provide students with as much information as possible before they apply and the wealth of colleges should continue to be published. There can be a problem with income disparities between colleges; all colleges should be focusing their resources on access and allowing JCRs to provide effective services for students.”

Paddy Unwin, a second year Maths student at St John’s believes there are some advantages to being at a richer college. The fact that the college has a lot of money “is noticeable in that we can have accommodation provided for all three years, for example,” he said.

“This year I’m living in a house it’s still college owned which is good. We can also claim the cost of things like books and sports equipment back off the college, which is very useful.”

Will Nash, a second year Earth Sciences student at Worcester, rejects the idea that the college’s wealth has to make a difference. Worcester has the second smallest endowment, and is in the bottom half of the table of income in 2007/08, having taken in £7.104 million. “You would never think this college is poor,” said Nash. “I’m shocked to hear that its endowment is so small. We can live in college for the duration of our course, and it’s like the Burj Al Arab hotel here, but without the hot weather.

“It says a lot about the college management that they can do so well for students despite apparently not having as much money as many other colleges.”

Alex Cavell, a second year Chemistry student, agreed that wealth was a less than significant factor. Cavell is at St Anne’s, a college with one of the smallest endowments, at £24.615 million. “I don’t feel that St Anne’s is a poorer college, but at the same time I wouldn’t imagine it’s one of the wealthiest. The college is well-maintained and not reluctant to build/renovate (the coffee shop and Ruth Deech Building both built in last few years), but if they had vast wealth I’m sure the Gatehouse building would have been knocked down years ago!”

Director of Undergraduate Admissions at Oxford University, Mike Nicholson, sought to allay any fears that students might have about being disadvantaged by their college’s wealth. “All undergraduate students, irrespective of their college, are entitled to receive an Oxford Opportunity Bursary if they meet the criteria,” he said. “This should address candidates’ concerns about the level of financial support they can access.

He continued, “About a quarter of applicants make open applications and a similar proportion of applicants receive offers from colleges that they did not have as a first preference. This demonstrates that the focus for undergraduate applicants should be the choice of courses available to them and material produced by undergraduate admissions provides this focus, giving applicants information that enables informed decisions on course choices.

“Extensive information on colleges is available in the prospectus and on-line, and candidates are encouraged to think about this when they have identified that the course at Oxford is appropriate for their own interests and aspirations.”