Friday 27th June 2025
Blog Page 2154

Interview: Brian Paddick

0

Frequently during his talk at the Union on Wednesday, Brian Paddick uses the word ‘controversy’, and it’s not difficult – considering his life and career – to see why. As well as being openly gay, he was the Liberal Democrat candidate for London Mayor in last summer’s elections. He attempted to implement a highly contentious cannabis policy in his role as Police Commander for Lambeth and then became the focus
of a cannabis scandal himself. He gave evidence against the London Metropolitan Police in the Stockwell Tube Station inquiry, whilst he was the Deputy Police Commissioner to Sir Ian Blair. And then he went on last year’s run of I’m a Celebrity! Get Me Out of Here.

He is a man who everybody claims to know something about, or at least have an opinion on – a somewhat intimidating reputation to have, I feel. However, upon meeting him, he is infallibly polite, funny and charming. He describes his mayoral candidate rival Boris Johnson as ‘loveable’, and states ‘liquidised camel penis’ as his favourite eating challenge during I’m a Celebrity.

Having studied PPE at the Queen’s College, Oxford is not new to him, and ‘walking around here makes me feel like I’m at home’. He missed out on the typical student experience as he arrived here aged 22, married, and funded by a police scholarship. However, he insists with great warmth that the experience was wonderful, and that he ‘would do it all over again’.

His path to Oxford began in an unconventional fashion typical to him, as he decided to write a letter to the admissions tutor at Christ Church before he officially applied. He received a firm but polite no, but his refusal to give in became a characteristic that would reappear in the course of events in his life.

Following his time at Oxford, he went on to do a postgraduate diploma at Cambridge. However, his ‘experience of student life’ was to be compromised again as he only studied during the vacations from his police training.
Religion has played a large part in Paddick’s life – whilst a student here, he preached at St. Aldates Church to ‘punk rockers and glue sniffers’ and attempted ‘a conversion mission’ and a promotion of Christianity. However, after coming out as homosexual and ‘going from church to church’, he found that ‘at the end of every service, the vicar would always query where my wife was’. Although he is ‘still a believer’, he is no longer an active part of the body of worshippers after the continual wrong assumptions about his sexuality.

This difficulty in reconciling two seemingly integral aspects in his life – his religion and his sexuality – seems trouble him less than I would have imagined, but then again he seems to be used to dealing with inconsistencies.
His sexuality comes under constant public scrutiny and I ask him how it feels to be labelled by the media as formerly being ‘the most senior and openly gay police officers in Britain’. He describes to me an article written the day following the July 7th bombings in London. At the time he was face that represented the police in the media, however the article in question focused on his sexuality alone. This indicated the major media interest in his homosexuality, and the journalist treated it as a concern.

‘Being gay is not everything about me’, he states, although the vast majority of the public seem to treat it as if it is. In 2008, Paddick made the Pink List, an annual compilation of the most influential homosexuals in Britain, for the second year in a row. However, he states that ‘I don’t feel that I’m influential, not in the fact that I’m gay anyway’. He makes jokes throughout his speech in the debating chamber about being homosexual, and is incredibly at ease when he is discussing it with me. He briefly discusses his marriage and being open with his wife about his sexuality, marking it out as being ‘one of the hardest things I have ever had to do’.

Clearly, this is a man with a lot of emotion beneath his calm exterior, and this comes across most vividly when I inquire as to what he feels his biggest achievement is. Smiling and apologising for being ‘gushy and gooey’, he tells me that meeting his current partner, Norwegian civil engineer Petter Belsvik, and marrying him just last month is most definitely it. ‘I had to kiss many frogs to find the right one.’

He went through much media furore after his ex-lover made cannabis allegations about him, which he denies furiously, claiming that he smoked the drug on a daily basis. This story had followed the controversy surrounding his drugs policy where, as Police Commissioner, he elected to focus on ‘harder’ drugs such as heroin and issue on the spot fines for those caught with cannabis. He felt that it made sense to focus on it this way, rather than cracking down on cannabis as planned and thus straining police resources. He didn’t try to implement this policy by the book either, although he admits that ‘in retrospect maybe I should have done’, as he first discussed the policy in a London newspaper, rather than submitting it to Scotland Yard.

His frank and outspoken manner on the matter is impressive, as are his unshakable beliefs. The police shooting of a Brazilian electrician at Stockwell Tube station brought Paddick into the limelight once again and only serves to highlight just how unswerving he can be. The police emphatically declared that they believed the victim, de Menezes, to be a terrorist for 24 hours following the incident, which Paddick declares emphatically as ‘wrong’.

According to him, just hours after the event he was informed by members of the police that an ordinary Brazilian citizen and he went on to testify for de Menezes’ family in the trial. His heavy criticism of Sir Ian Blair’s events during the crisis was ‘what I feel prevented me from moving up the ladder’ in the police force into the most senior position – but he does not regret speaking out.

Paddick’s work in the police force is now over after the de Menezes crisis and although he feels he can ‘never go back’, he is moving up and on. As well as featuring in interviews and lecturing at the University of Ashridge’s Business School, he has just been offered a presenting job for a programme which will visit riot squads in different countries. Aptly named ‘I predict a Riot’, he turned it down, ‘it sounded a bit too butch for me really’. Although he has come under much public scrutiny over the years, Paddick remains unswervingly passionate and principled. He ‘couldn’t not tell the truth’ when it came to the injustice he felt surrounding Stockwell, even though it cost him dearly. ‘I greatly miss being on the beat, and actually helping people’.

He leaves me with the impression he has a lot of things he still wishes to achieve, stating matter of factly that ‘I’m not mature, except in age perhaps’. Whatever preconception you hold about Brian Paddick, be prepared to keep on changing it.

 

Renegade

0

 

The Oxford Revue has established itself as a major force for laughter in recent years and this offering shows no sign of letting that slip. For those who haven’t seen them in action before, their work consists of a rapid succession of individual sketches delivered by an ensemble cast who play a wide range of characters ranging from the sublime to the ridiculous; even God gets a mention although he is criticized for his greasy hair; ‘what’s this- the Richard Dawkins fan club?’ Is his response; not too bad by his standards. Even if you are familiar with the work of this band of wandering jesters you should not assume that there will be no surprises in the upcoming production: Renegade. This latest outing extends the scope and ambition of the comedy outfit to include music, technical wizardry and something approaching a full length production (the last few offerings have been criminally short). Success is always a difficult thing for any group to enjoy. We can all list our favourite bands that have struggled to live up to previous achievements and floundered when faced with the awkward dilemma of whether to change and grow, and risk alienating their existing fan base, or whether to stick to what they do best, and risk exasperating them. Good as The Oxford Revue are, I regret to announce that they have not found any new answers to this age old dilemma. Instead they seem to take a little from both philosophies: keeping the sketch format while increasing length and production values.

The resulting beast is somewhat clumsy but eminently loveable. There is a quirkiness that underlies their whole take on ‘comedy’ that makes any time spent in their company a curiously charming affair. I use the concept of ‘quirkiness’ not in the, ‘slap you in the nostril with a tea-bag’ sense of The Mighty Boosh: one does not feel the need to ingest hallucinogenic material in order to enjoy The Revue. Neither does it quite lapse into the whimsy of harmless and inoffensive remarks about genial fellows and their genial goings on: although this was threatened by an unusually flat scene concerning a teacher and his understanding of lab safety. The sketch format is its saving grace at the points where the energy of the production seems to lag- whenever a slight feeling of, not boredom but perhaps fatigue, creeps in there is always something bright, fresh and exciting to divert attention elsewhere. Renegade is a thoroughly enjoyable production which blends the old with the new- the result is not perfect harmony but, unquestionably, a fine piece of work.

 

Price £7 for students

Why, why, why?

0

It is a popular and widely-known fact that there are some questions science can’t answer. For those, as we well know, we must hand over to the chaplain. He will probably flap his robes, quote from the New Testament and conclude that God moves in mysterious ways.

Enough religion-bashing. What questions exactly can’t science answer? They are commonly grouped as ‘why’ questions: physics can describe gravity, and explain how its strength varies with proximity to massive bodies, and even quantify how clocks will run at different speeds depending on gravitation, but why it exists is beyond the realm of scientific enquiry.

‘Why’ questions may sound like an intuitive set but, like all purely linguistic definitions, it’s phoney and imprecise. I had to be very careful in that last paragraph not to write that we know ‘why’ gravity’s strength varies—linguistically, it parses, and logically, we do know: it’s because mass bends space–time. In fundamental science, it is fair to say we know ‘why’ something happens if we have an accurate mathematical theory underpinning it.

What do we need for a mathematical description of a phenomenon? We need to take repeated measurements against which we can compare the theory’s predictions: the wobble in Mercury’s orbit, the bending of light by huge, distant galaxies…all data points corroborating general relativity. Crucially, to keep the Popperians happy, we must not find any credible counter-examples.

So what creates what we loosely called a ‘why’ question above? The lack of multiple instances for comparison. Say we found another universe where gravity was weaker—we would look deeper, and try to come up with a general rule which explained the difference. Perhaps other aspects of that universe would be different, and perhaps those differences would highlight an interplay between the constants of our Universe that we hadn’t already noticed. However, even this idealised hypothesising leaves open the question of ‘why’ our newer, better, more explanatory theory is true.

The reductio ad absurdum at the end of the tunnel is the most fundamental question in philosophy—why is there something rather than nothing? That is perhaps the only question science will never be able to answer. Time to hand over, not to the chaplain, but to the anthropic principle: if there weren’t something rather than nothing, we’d not be here worrying about it.

Five Minute Tute: All Souls

0

What is Unique about All Souls?

It is often said that All Souls is unique because it has no students. This is incorrect. One category of fellowship, the Prize Fellowship, is open to people who have recently completed an undergraduate degree or recently registered for a postgraduate course: six current Prize Fellows are graduate students. All Souls is, however, unique in that all members of the College are Fellows, and are therefore full voting members of the Governing Body. Unlike at most Colleges, several Fellows’ main work is outwith academia: current and recent Fellows include politicians, lawyers, novelists and an internet entrepreneur. The College believes that people working in such fields are enriched by contact with academia, and that academia is enriched by contact with them. The Prize Fellowship is a further distinctive feature of All Souls. The Fellowship lasts for seven years and Prize Fellows can choose whether to do academic work or to pursue another career. The flexibility and duration of the Prize Fellowship makes it an unparalleled opportunity for people early in their careers.

How do you become a Fellow of All Souls?

There are several categories of Fellowship. The selection procedure for each category of Fellowship is different, but all appointments are made on merit and all Fellowships are open to both women and men. As at other colleges and universities, Senior Research Fellows and Post-Doctoral Research Fellows are chosen on the basis of their proposals for future research and their record of academic achievement.

Some University Professorships and Lectureships are associated with All Souls. Prize Fellows are selected after a written examination, which is held at the end of the summer vacation. Candidates write essays in response to questions on their area of academic work. There is also a general component to the examination, and one paper involves writing an essay in response to a single word (e.g. bias, water, harmony). Copies of past papers are available on the College website. The written examination is used to draw up a shortlist of candidates for interview.

Many people think that you need to receive some kind of invitation to sit the Prize Fellowship examination – this is not true. Anyone who meets the eligibility criteria set out on the College website can apply. The College is concerned that relatively few women choose to sit the Prize Fellowship examination. To encourage potential female candidates to inform themselves about the College and the Fellowship, an open evening for women will be held on Friday 13 March (eighth week) from 5pm to 7pm in the Old Library.

What do Fellow of All Souls do?

Most Fellows spend the majority of their time doing academic research. All Souls has particular strengths in History and Law, but there are Fellows working in a broad range of fields in both sciences and humanities. Many Fellows also teach or supervise students from other colleges and give a variety of lectures and seminars for the University as a whole. Fellows who work outwith academia play an important role in the governance of the College and participate from time to time in academic activities (e.g. conferences) that relate to their area of employment. Fellows who are not engaged on academic work receive minimal payment from the College.

Are there any strange traditions at All Souls?

Most, if not all, colleges have their own peculiar traditions, and All Souls is no exception. Legend has it that, when the College’s foundations were being dug, an enormous mallard flew out of a drain where it had been trapped for many years. The mallard became a College symbol and the ‘Mallard Song’ is sung by Fellows on a few College occasions. In 1801, there was a procession to mark the new century. This involved Fellows marching around the College with blazing torches and singing the Mallard Song; a mallard was carried on a pole. The event was repeated in 1901 and 2001, but fortunately no animal is now involved!

 

On the lash: Drunken Dumbo’s

0

This guy’s got me pinned up against the wall with one hand, the other’s round my throat. Now, truth be told, I don’t have a macho bone in my body and any minute now I may very well, as mother will have it said, dump a gusher. He’s also happens to be built like a shit house, a symphony of gristle. To top things off, post-bop, he’s dressed as a very well known Disney character. I don’t know if you’ve ever been twatted by Dumbo, but by God it does nothing for your self-esteem. ‘I could fucking kill you’ he says, spitting beer and phlegm in my face. At this point I remember the advice they gave girls in my high school – ‘if ever you find yourself imposed upon by a gentleman of the irascible persuasion, try your very best to vomit on your attacker’. So while I’m trying my best to retch like so many supermodels (tricky at the best of times, even more so when you throw in a Neanderthal death grip), he slurs ‘y’see, I couldn’t lose face, you’d just…you’re not gonna have one up on me’, as he pushes my head against the stone for the second and third times. I should explain at this point that I spilled his drink.

Just five minutes ago Mr. Dumbo had been laughing, joking, a genuine human being; 0 to 4.48 Psychosis in five seconds flat and over what? Spilt milk. Or Tennant’s Special Brew, judging by his breath. Don’t let the dazed expression of the heavy drinker fool you – sure, they’ve got all the emotional depth of a puddle, all the dimensions of a badly drawn cartoon, but by Christ they’re quick with their fists. Perhaps noticing that my face is all too shockingly purple, he leaves off my throat and starts ripping the buttons off my shirt. You can barely hear them pitter patter on the ground in first quod over his frantic, heavy breathing. The next morning in college, as far as he and his friends are concerned, nothing happened. And that’s just it, as soon as there’s a question of culpability, the ‘lash’ steps in as an excuse: ‘Maaaate, I was well wasted last night, I can’t remember a thing.’

The risks of heavy drinking include liver cirrhosis, wet brain dehydration, damage to the nervous system, bowel cancer, low sperm count and shrinking of the genitals – I’m not saying binge drinkers are little pricks, but apparently they have them. In a 2001 study it was found that 40% of those who killed themselves in England and Wales had a history of alcohol abuse. In 40% of violent crimes victims say that the perpetrators were under the influence of alcohol. So why do we do it? We’re being screwed over by the drinks industry and their influence over pubs, clubs and bars. In a recent study, The Glasgow Media Group observed that the UK industry has become dominated by large companies, which own chains of nightclubs, bars and restaurants as well as traditional pubs. Alcohol Concern reports that they spend £227 million a year on advertising their products, while the government spends just £1 million on the treatment and prevention of alcoholism. ‘Vertical Drinking’ is a marketing buzzword – people are more likely to drink if they can’t sit down. We’ll drink even more if flat surfaces are removed and the music makes talking impossible. The drinks industry is obsessed purely with the volume of its sales. As Andrew McNeill of the Institute of Alcohol Studies has observed ‘at one point, one of the biggest owners of pubs was a Japanese bank. Someone in Tokyo is not going to worry about what happens in the British high street.’

The Glasgow Media Group questioned 244 young people in higher education, aged 18 – 23 on their opinions on drinking habits in the U.K. Here is one of their questions:”Do you ever feel pressured to drink alcohol in the sense that he would be left out if you didn’t?” This is potentially difficult for people to answer, especially in a brief questionnaire, since to agree is in a sense an admission of weakness. But as it turned out 31% said yes. So deeply rooted is binge drinking in our culture that we can’t imagine having a good time without it. What have the Romans ever done for us? Well, they did bring us the taberna, which quickly developed into the alehouse. As early as the middle ages binge drinking was being identified as a nuisance, especially among the clergy, leading Bishop Anselm to decree in 1102 “Let no priest go to drinking bouts, nor drink to pegs”. Government funded campaigns don’t seem to be working. But what use are billboards of girls vomming in the streets if these are the same photos that will appear on facebook tomorrow morning? It’s a hard drug that’s surrounded by a warm glow – we boast about how much alcohol we drink and its effects in a way we wouldn’t about heroin. Yet that so called dangerous drug kills very few by comparison with alcohol. We should be focusing on its darker effects, like what happens in alcoholic families. Booze is a class A drug with good public relations.

 

For the Love of Film 7

For the Love of Film returns once again – as promised!

The Prodigy – Invaders Must Die

0

Invaders Must Die begins with a mangled sample: ‘We are the Prodigy’. It’s helpful; the first track owes so much to Justice’s metal-dance stomping you could be forgiven for making the mistake. But then, arguably, Liam Howlett’s dance collective has been in identity crisis for over a decade, ever since the release of the seminal Fat of the Land in 1997.

Back then, the Prodigy were heroes. Unique in their ability to make listenable the mind-numbingly repetitive music of the underground rave scene, the great British public lapped them up, swooning to their inventive breakbeat and Keith Flint’s horned hair-dos. For a while, every Prodigy release was awaited breathlessly by legions of straight pop fans, pill-heads and the odd impressionable youth, like me.

Leaving teary-eyed nostalgia to one side, it’s hard to say whether this is a good album or not. Howlett’s samples/lyrics are awful certainly, with ‘The world’s on fire/it’s about to expire’ a particular lowlight. But then they were always rubbish, even if Breathe’s ‘Psycho-somatic addict insane’ did sound pretty badass to my twelve-year-old ears.

The real problem with the album is that it’s so obvious that this is a purposeful rehash of Fat of the Land, with the occasional subconscious nod in the direction of Daft Punk and Justice. It all sounds as though Howlett’s bed of money has become a little less fluffy of late, and he’s gone about getting some more in the easiest way possible.

‘Omen’, deemed by the band to be worth a reprise at the end of the album, is a decent stab at re-writing ‘Out of Space’, while ‘Warrior’s Dance’s female vocalist does OK in her attempt to dilute the barrels of nervous testosterone that fuel the rest of the album.

If you think ‘Firestarter’ represents a rebellious call-to-arms to a disillusioned generation Y, buy this album because you will love it. Otherwise, don’t bother. Liam ‘dance visionary’ Howlett should be trying harder than this.

In a pit of despair?

0

Michael Angelakos is a pretty complicated character. Passion Pit, the band he formed just two years ago, are widely tipped for ‘big things’ this year, and yet he could hardly seem less happy. Moody and hirsute, he shuffles around the backstage area of the Bullingdon Arms before the gig, looking pretty out of place. He is something of an anomaly in this environment, failing to fulfil the typical stereotype of the touring musician. In his own words, ‘I don’t want to party man, I wish I did! Some guy just offered us MDMA? I just want to go back to the bus and sleep before the show.’

Passion Pit’s debut EP Chunk of Change grew out of six songs recorded in 2007 while Angelakos was in college in Boston, and was originally conceived as a Valentine’s Day present for his girlfriend. The music became popular among the student community and prompted Angelakos to take it more seriously. Though the music was born out of something

romantic, he is keen to underline that it is actually a pretty dark record.
It was the product of an unhappy time and he is fascinated by the manner in which the lyrical content of the album goes unnoticed by listeners, who assume it to be an exercise in sentimentality. ‘People listened to the last record and thought, oh sure, it’s pop music, it’s a love album. If you read the lyrics, this person is talking about how much of an asshole he is, and how much he wishes he could love his girlfriend as much as she loves him.’
He believes that the best pop music exhibits this dichotomy of light and dark. ‘Beautiful pop music invades your skull, it’s a powerful vehicle. A lot of the time we’re dealing with heavy subjects; thematically our music is dark. But because the vessel is sugar-coated pop music, people don’t understand what they’re receiving.’

It’s a phenomenon that Angelakos has obviously spent time thinking about; he is absorbed completely by his love of pop music, and seems to enjoy analysing what it is that’s effective about pop music in order to apply the theories to his own. It is a very scientific approach to music. ‘The idea of producing electronic music made sense to me because it’s so mathematical.’ Angelakos is known to be something of a perfectionist and has spent months in the studio trying to locate the right formulae for the band’s music. The early signs are that he has come close to success.

Angelakos started making the music that would become Passion Pit in 2007 in an attempt to lift himself out of a period of depression. ‘I needed something to help me rejuvenate myself, because I was pretty low.’ Perhaps his obsession with the dark side of music is the result of his own problems with depression; he admits that it colours everything he does. Unlikely many musicians with similar problems, he does not see music as a form of therapy, however. ‘I don’t see music as therapy, therapy is something that makes life easier, and all this just makes things a lot harder.’

Here, Angelakos underlines what makes him something of an enigma. He clearly loves music and always hoped to pursue a career in music, but now his band is really taking off, he seems unsure if he is entirely happy with the situation.

Onstage Passion Pit almost live up to the expectations which have been heaped on them by countless music journalists since the close of last year. The songs are generally excellent, often coming close, and the music throughout features a pulse strong enough to seduce the dancing feet of the most intransigent members of the crowd in the Bullingdon Arms. Angelakos admits before the show, however, that the band has played less than 50 shows together, and at times this is evident. Nonetheless the band’s debut album, released later this year, is likely to be great and should see Passion Pit justify the hype.

Things are looking good for Passion Pit, but is it making Michael Angelakos happy? ‘It’s a good thing,’ he sighs, ‘It is what it is,’ and lifting his hood over his head, he walks back to the bus to sleep before the show.

The Ideas Man by Shed Simove

0

I’ve always felt that as a Cherwell culture reviewer, it’s been solemnly incumbent on me to safeguard the students of Oxford from corrupting sleaze. Obviously then, I had a duty to review Shed Simove’s Ideas Man – the blurb markets him as a guy who, amongst other things, invented ‘Clitoris Allsorts’ sweets, which instantly set my smut-sense a-tingling.

But I can tell you now that no matter how hard I tried, I just couldn’t find any trace of sordid sexploitation and unmitigated filth I’d been eagerly anticipating protecting you all from. In fact, I thought I’d opened the wrong book.
Simove doesn’t sound anything like the cynical, witty Channel 4 producer I’d envisioned, but instead sounds boyishly earnest and enthusiastic as he talks about all his wacky product ideas and his attempts at getting them made.

Some of them, like the ‘Control-A-Man/Woman’ gag remote, turned out well. Others less so, like the national fuss over him going undercover as a 16 year-old for a TV documentary. With the occasional photo, sketch and newspaper clipping, it’s a bit like looking at a scrapbook of memories.
They are all pretty amusing memories on the whole, though they stop short of being as ‘hilarious’ as the blurb breathlessly says. Some of the product ideas are cute or gross in a funny way, like the ‘Pubik’s Cube’, or celebrity trading cards, or his idea to trademark the phrase ‘The Trademark Office Has No Sense of Humour’TM, which he did after exasperatedly failing to convince them to register the clitoral sweets.

But because of his rather pedestrian style the prose seldom reaches laugh-out-loud levels. It can even get a little tedious if you read it all at once. Simove gets an idea, works on it, gets rejected, then possibly succeeds. Rinse and repeat. In this sense Ideas Man is marketed as an inspirational story about a guy who never gives up, though I’m not convinced.

It’s certainly more useful than your average self-help book, and great if you want an example of the kind of grit and resourcefulness you need when peddling your ideas to people. But the fact that the ideas are about stuff like ‘Butt Plugs’ undercuts the inspirational potential just a little, I think.
Also Simove’s relentless can-do attitude can grate a little, especially in preachy moments where he talks about a lesson he’s learned or tries to impart some banal motivational wisdom.

Still, Ideas Man is an easy read. If anything, it offers the heartening insight that the sleek machine of mass commercialism isn’t just a capitalist ploy; there actually are people like Simove who are passionate about coming up with ‘Door Nobs’ and ‘Designer Beavers’. Whether that terrifies or inspires is entirely up to you.

Raphaël Zarka – Geometry Improved

0

French skateboarder/artist Raphaël Zarka’s Formes du Repos found him exploring his curiosity for man-made structures and geometrical forms. He travelled the French countryside photographing unfinished concrete constructions – a lone pylon, an unfinished monorail – describing them as ‘involuntary sculptures’. It represented an artist of genuine substance. His first exhibition in the UK, Geometry Improved therfore comes as a great disappointment.

In Formes du Repos his images contrasted these so called ‘involuntary sculptures’ with the countryside around them. They stand as immovable, indelible marks upon their surroundings, monuments to the ever expanding urban environment. Zarka’s composition in these photographs is particularly effective, framing the shots with barren expanses or, in the case of the three works exhibited at Modern Art Oxford, vibrant greenery.

We get a flavour of this previous work with this current exhibition, including Zarka’s documentary films on the history of skateboarding, which demonstrate his fascination with engagement of public spaces, viewing them not as background but as medium. Sadly, however, these play a merely supporting role to the rather less successful Les Billes de Sharp, the main focus of Geometry Improved.

Les Billes follows much the same ‘found structure’ formula of which the artist is so fond. Zarka has taken one ‘found structure’, oak beams, and carved into them a second, diagrams by British astronomer Abraham Sharp. Although the method remains the same, the substance has all but evaporated. Meanwhile, ‘Les Deductions des Sharp’, a piece of plywood with a series of geometrical shapes cut out of it, flounders in the corner like an unfinished GCSE art project.
Whereas before, Zarka’s work spoke of a sincere fascination with the urban environment, it now lacks both immediacy and depth. Although the astronomical diagrams exhibit a degree of precision and intricacy, and have some aesthetic worth, the exhibit certainly isn’t striking nor does it appear to have any of the philosophical justification we would expect from Zarka’s work; you will find yourself getting bored fairly quickly.

Zarka’s photography demonstrates that he has a solid grasp on the use of space but that skill has not transferred to his installation; the seemingly random arrangement of beams that confronts you when you first enter crosses the line from mystery to meaninglessness – one gets the impression that he has not given his new medium much thought.

You could easily drop in for a brief shufti, but make sure you go to Sainsbury’s for your weekly food shop as well to make the trip worthwhile.