Oxford's oldest student newspaper

Independent since 1920

Blog Page 2164

Disturbance at Campsfield House

 

Fire broke out at Campsfield House Immigration Removal Centre on Saturday 14th, with plumes of smoke reportedly visible.

 

It is believed small fires were started, but were limited to one block of the facility. 

 

Violent disturbances were reported, with a number of inmates reportedly smashing furniture and climbing onto the roof.

 

There was a heavy police presence and 10 fire engines are understood to have attended, as well as a police helicopter and paramedics. One detainee was apparently seen being put into an ambulance.

 

A inmate told independent news site Indymedia that the incident began around lunchtime, with detainees protesting over detention times. Detainees were held in an exercise yard during the incident.

 

A Home Office spokesman said: "Police were asked by the UK Border
Agency for assistance and police have secured the perimeter, which has
not been breached.

 

"Specially trained prison officers have been sent to the site in riot gear in case they are needed to go inside." 

 

This is not the first time the controversial detention centre has seen such an incident. In July last year 26 people escaped after a fire, with 8 still on the run, and there have been two further incidents in the last 16 months.

 

In a video investigation for Cherwell last term, Nejra Cehic uncovered allegations of violence within Campsfield House and examined the plight of failed asylum seekers.

 

Campsfield House is run by the UK branch of private American firm GEO Group Inc. 

Canvassing banned at Teddy Hall

A controversial motion to ban all political and religious door-to-door canvassing at St Edmund Hall was passed at a meeting of the college’s JCR in Eighth Week.

A friendly amendment to the motion extended the ban to all door-to-door canvassing, with particular reference to environmental issues. A further friendly amendment proposed that this new stance should be formally added to the college’s official rule book.

Rosie Shann, who proposed the motion, claimed she was dismayed by students being bothered in their rooms by door-to-door canvassers. “These practices put [students] on the spot,” she said, “and whilst it is all very well to say that students can just ask canvassers to go away, this doesn’t always happen.”

However, the ban has angered other members of the JCR, who have claimed that the motion targeted specific members of the college community, including the Christian Union.

Mark Mills, a first year historian at Teddy Hall who has now been named Lib Dem councillor for the Holywell ward, expressed his displeasure at the restrictions on canvassing within his college: “People do not canvass for malicious reasons, it causes no great harm and has many benefits. It allows societies to communicate with a broader section of the college community than they would otherwise be able to.”

Environment and Ethics officer Daniel Lowe criticised the circumstances in which the motion was passed, branding it a “nothing motion” and calling the process “farcical.” According to Lowe, no agendas were sent out informing college members of the proposed motion, and the JCR meeting was held with a football match on the television in the background, which distracted those present from the debate around the motion.

JCR president Charlie Southern, however, played down concerns around the motion, claiming that it was “not a pressing issue, but if the JCR wants it dealt with it shall be.”

Oxfordmania!

 

I’m afraid I’m going to have to nail my colours to the mast straight off. Oxford is weird. Oxford people are weird. That is all. 

 

No doubt many of you have just reeled back from the page in horror, clutching your breasts and choking with indignation, “Weird? Moi?” Quite apart from the fact that you’ve just responded in French, the likelihood is that yes, even you, the most normal, well balanced and sober undergraduate that ever walked a mile in dark brown brogues, have some dark and lurking secret that skulks, guilty and sordid, in the dim places at the back of your mind.

 

A secret that requires only a certain atmosphere to burst forth, merrily clad in Morris-dancing clothes, and swagger off down the broad with handkerchiefs and bells held high.

 

Oxford is this atmosphere. Centuries of steadfastly ignoring the progression of the outside world, and the gradual accumulation of traditions in the manner of a bag lady collecting string, have left Oxford in the unique position of being thoroughly entrenched, in the public eye, against any sort of normalcy.

 

Ask almost anyone on any street in Britain what they think of when it comes to Oxford, and the traditional images leap or vault to mind; Pimms on the lawn, messing around on the river in various capacities, antiquated libraries with guttering candles, earnest conversations about Eliot or Woolf over sherry with avuncular and eccentric dons in horn-rimmed spectacles.

 

And then of course there are the negative stereotypes – everyone has an Eton or Harrow accent/education, is so intellectual as to be positively incomprehensible in everyday speech, cosy conservatism, unthinking prejudice and a hearty dislike for anyone with an accent north of Watford Gap.

 

In universities from Bristol to Edinburgh, the news that you go to Oxford, (regardless of that institutions own stellar reputation), is always greeted with a raucous collection of brays and a surge towards the alcohol, that the participants might raise containers and moo at each other in their fond imitation of ‘posh’.

 

To go to Oxford is apparently, as a result of this instant wealth of stereotype, almost an automatic system of excuse. No matter how eccentric your appearance, table manners or method of speaking, the fact that you’re an Oxon means that it is Only To be Expected.

 

Almost as soon as you leave school or home to come here, this fact falls like a blind between you and the family and friends from home, so that any statement vaguely bizarre, curious or related to an intimate detail of your subject that you find toe-curlingly exciting is met with an indulgent “He’s at Oxford…”.

 

This was brought to my attention most recently by the joys of the college garden party, a rare sign from the university that the students it domineers and terrifies in the strangest sadomasochistic relationship in the academic world were actually physically birthed, as opposed to manifesting, sweating and blinking with paralysing fear, just outside the office door of their interviewers. Here one got to see the attitude with which people’s parents approached their spawn, and the associates of their spawn, and this same, slightly wary idea was evident.

 

These were ‘Oxford students’, about whom weird and wacky things had been heard, and there was no telling what they might do – up to and including joining in the rousing chorus of the brass band adaptation of ‘Love and Marriage’ with an explosive, strawberry-filled finale.

 

This is not to say that other universities do not have their eccentrics, or that other institutes of learning are not thoroughly mad. The Slade School of Art, for example, in their recent exhibition, displayed a beautiful series of organically-shaped and beautifully inscribed miniature sculptures that turned out to be models of the artist’s own excrement, engraved with the sensations he apparently felt whilst…creating them.

 

Everyone has their faults, flaws, quirks and traits, and this is what makes people so exciting, but there is a sliding scale between those who occasionally rub a Smurf for good luck before going into an exam and those who feel a burning urge to perform evocative and very vocal drama in skimpy leotards on Cornmarket on an February midnight, to an audience that consisted of a fair mix of long-haired and eager student radicals and highly inebriated football fans themselves much concerned with the female actors’ bodily health.

 

Other universities are crazed also, but they, to an extent that Oxford blithely and majestically ignores, are related to the Real World; they occupy cities like Manchester or Birmingham or Liverpool, for example. In such cities, the sight of a bespectacled chemist in an academic robe being chased down a cobbled street and pelted with handfuls of flour, obscenely-shaped chocolates and small packets of washing-up liquid might be considered odd, or even in certain areas grounds for physical restraint.

 

It is the saturation of the city of Oxford with the eccentricities of a student population that is proportionately huge that means no such judgement, save in a passive sort of way, ever occurs. Thus, we are able to live in the Arcadia continually referenced by writers throughout the ages.

However, this is not to say that the ‘Oxford Mania’, as we might call it, is without its downsides. The bizarre relationship between student and tutor, where all of one’s pride, insecurity and sense of self-worth is compressed into an hour long discussion with one of the world’s finest minds, married to a bizarre affection and chivalrous desire to protect one’s own, breeds a special kind of neuroticism not found outside the tutorial system.

 

Then there is the sheer pressure of work, the amount of books, articles and essays that leaves you short-tempered when an old school friend calls to complain about their thousand-word thesis due in a fortnight. And then there are the exams that shred the summer-term joy from the freshers and instil all third-years with an air of gloom reminiscent of Napoleon on his way back from Moscow. 

 

Not for nothing are the famous dreaming spires closed to finalists. It’s a curious phenomenon, for such an apparently intelligent bunch we almost seem to self-sabotage. We have all done it, regardless of our apparent brightness – after a week of lazy reading, we’ve ended up hunched over a desk in the library at half-past four in the morning with an attractive cocktail of Red Bull and tar-like coffee in a gradually decomposing cup and a half-finished essay mostly lifted from an obscure Belgian scholar from the fifties.

 

Surely the most basic self-preservation instincts would strive to prevent this, and the subsequent shame of being dissected alive by one of the world’s most respected scholars. But no, we blunder on, driven by an insane desire to prove ourselves and, lest we forget, the love for our subject that we grudgingly admit still lives, despite the onslaught.

 

Clearly, the Oxford frame of mind, the supposed aim for all those frantic tourists who throng the city, is a difficult beastie. Without the moderating influence of the outside world, (if not for the BBC News website, I doubt the majority of Oxford would be aware of imminent nuclear holocaust), all our fancies are capable of running wild and free.

 

One might bring about the world premiere of an apparently unstageable play, or charge to the parks in homemade chainmail to hit one’s friends with very heavy swords. The parameters of normal behaviour are laxer here, and for the better.

 

Admittedly, I am not speaking from an entirely objective point of view. From an early age an unhealthy fixation with reading and a romantic disposition that borders on the pathological have combined to create, in what one might call selective logic, the resolution that I too must attend Oxford; Cambridge was never a possibility and was filed away as a nebulous and evil presence, a conclusion only ratified when I finally visited it many years later. This is a city where any peculiarities I possess are accepted or even ignored as entirely normal.

 

This entire reflection has been prompted, mostly, by the shameless blossoming of the Oxford stereotypes that come with Trinity term. Here, in the most high-pressure term for the majority of the students, any possible outlet is exploited – the ball season, where everyone abandons self-restraint and dignity in revelling that seems to inevitably revolve around the chocolate fountain, or Summer Eights, where on the Saturday the sleepy die-hard cheerleaders are bolstered by what seems a large portion of Oxfordshire and beyond, all of them trumpeting the virtues of management consultancy.

 

In Trinity, when the weather [periodically] supports the dreams of a thousand garden-party planners, the city finally rises into its position as a dreamlike Arcadia and takes possession of its status as a place apart, and thus it is the time when the glorious weirdness of those who sail in her is allowed to burn brightest.

 

So yes, Oxford is weird, and Oxford people are weird in a way entirely their own. This is No Bad Thing.

 

Oxford students, being weird.

 

Photos: Ian Bhullar

Stylist: Kate Shouesmith

Sub fusc: Models’ own

Lib Dems hold Holywell

See the full by-election results

The Liberal Democrats have won the Holywell by-election, retaining their second council seat for this ward.

Mark Mills, a student at Teddy Hall and the Lib Dem candidate, won with 183 votes.

Polls were open 7am-10pm for the by-election, which was triggered by Lib Dem councillor Richard Huzzey’s resignation.

Richard Huzzey stood down just days after the local elections, announcing he had been offered a post-doctoral research fellowship at Yale University, which he described as “too good to miss”.

Mr Huzzey was elected in 2006, and was not up for re-election in 2008 as Oxford City Council is elected in halves, with one of the two seats for each ward elected every two years.

At the time, Mr Huzzey said: “It’s been fantastic to work with Holywell residents over the past two years, and I’d have liked to continue for the rest of my four-year term.

“Yet an academic job at Yale is just too good to miss.”

 

Lib Dem success

The win will be heartening for the Lib Dems, who lost administrative control over the City Council after the local elections in May, when they lost ground to Labour.

The Council, however, still remains under no overall control.

The Lib Dems are likely to have benefited from the timing of the poll, as most students were still eligible to vote. However, many were sitting exams.

In the local elections recently held, the Lib Dems performed well in the two main student wards, Carfax and Holywell, but fared poorly elsewhere.

Lib Dem candidate Nathan Pyle won his Holywell ward seat with more than twice the votes of the second place Conservative candidate, Alex Stafford.

 

Familiar faces

Apart from the Lib Dems, the other party’s candidates were all familiar faces, having all lost in the May local elections.

Paul Sargent, who defected to the Conservatives from the Lib Dems during his term, and subsequently lost his council seat to Lib Dem Stephen Brown at the beginning of May, came second place in the by-election.

Green candidate Chip Sherwood also had a second attempt, having come third in the race for the other Holywell seat in May.

Sarah Hutchinson, a graduate student, stood for Labour, having lost in the Carfax elections in May.

 

Canvassing

Many students experienced heavy campaigning in the run-up to the by-election.

On the day, the parties were canvassing outside many of the Holywell ward colleges as well as the King’s Arms crossroads. Despite this, voter turnout was just 11.7%. At the local elections in May, turnout was 26.9% for Holywell.

At Teddy Hall, the college of winning candidate Mark Mills, a JCR motion was passed on Sunday banning all door-to-door canvassing.

 

Results

Candidate Party Votes
Sarah Hutchinson Labour 93
Mark Mills Lib Dem 188
Chip Sherwood Green 72
Paul Sargent Conservative 112

Turnout: 11.7%

New Linguistics faculty for Oxford

Oxford University will launch its new faculty for Linguistics, Philology and Phonetics on August 1 2008. The faculty will centralise Oxford’s research and teaching in the subject, which has traditionally taken place in separate faculties across the university.

The move, announced June 6 2008, is said to reflect current trends for interdisciplinary research in the area. Faculty members will work across the areas of linguistics and neuroscience, as well as working closely with the existing Experimental Psychology Department.

The creation of the new faculty should allow Oxford to extend its research into the areas of cognitive science, experimental psychology and computing in relation to the study of language. There are also plans to introduce new courses for undergraduates wishing to study this field.

Despite having had no centralised faculty until now, Oxford’s Linguistics department was named joint best in the country by the Times Good University Guide 2007. The new plans were welcomed by existing Linguistics staff and by members of the Humanities Division.

By-election polls open

By-election result here as soon as it is announced

Polls are open today for the Holywell by-election triggered by Lib Dem councillor Richard Huzzey’s resignation.

 

Richard Huzzey stood down just days after the
local elections, announcing he had been offered a post-doctoral research fellowship at Yale
University
which he described as
“too good to miss”.

  Richard Huzzey

Mr Huzzey was elected in 2006, and was not up for
re-election in 2008 as Oxford City Council is elected in halves, with one of the
two seats for each ward elected every two years.

 

At the time, Mr Huzzey said: “It’s been fantastic to work with Holywell
residents over the past two years, and I’d have liked to continue for the rest
of my four-year term.


"Yet an academic job at Yale is just too good to miss.”

 

Lib Dem hopes

 

The Lib Dems will be keen for success in the by-election,
after losing ground to Labour in the elections in May.

 

They will not want their influence in the council further reduced.


After the local elections, Labour extended their majority over the Lib
Dems and took administrative control of the council, although they
still lack the majority needed for overall control. 

 

The Lib Dems may benefit from the timing of the poll, as many students will still be eligible to
vote. However, many will also be sitting exams.

 

In the local elections recently held, the Lib Dems performed
well in the two main student wards, Carfax and Holywell, but fared poorly
elsewhere.

 

Lib Dem candidate Nathan Pyle won his Holywell ward seat
with more than twice the votes of the second place Conservative candidate, Alex
Stafford.

 

Candidates

 

Several by-election candidates stood in the recent local elections.

 

Two losing candidates from the Carfax election, Sarah
Hutchinson for Labour, and Paul Sargent for the Conservatives, are hoping for
better luck in Holywell.

 

Paul Sargent defected to the Conservatives from the Lib Dems
during his term, and subsequently lost his council seat to Lib Dem Stephen
Brown at the beginning of May.

 

Green candidate Chip Sherwood is also having a second
attempt, having come third in the race for the other Holywell seat in May.

 

The Lib Dems are fielding a fresh face, in the form of Mark
Mills, a student at Teddy Hall.

 

Council

 

While the Lib Dems will want to retain their seat, Labour will be keen to further extend their majority in the hope of achieving overall control at the next local elections.

 

Meanwhile the Conservatives are seeking to regain a presence in the council, after having lost both their seats in May’s local election.

 

The Green Party will be aiming to make up for a lacklustre performance in May.

 

Canvassing

 

Many students have experienced heavy campaigning in the run-up to the by-election, and the parties have been canvassing outside many of the Holywell colleges today.


At Teddy Hall, a JCR motion was passed on Sunday banning all door-to-door canvassing.

 

The Holywell polling station at the Magdalen Auditorium on Longwall Street is open from 7am until 10pm.


 


Cherwell will have the by-election result as soon as it is announced.

 

Results

 

Candidate Party Votes
Sarah Hutchinson Labour  93
Mark Mills Lib Dem 188 
Chip Sherwood Green  72
Paul Sargent Conservative  112

‘Violence and destitution’ at Campsfield House

Nejra Cehic investigates the plight of failed asylum seekers in the UK,
focussing on community activity around the issue in Oxfordshire.

 

During the video, Harris, a failed asylum seeker from Sierra Leone, recalls a violent incident he claims to have witnessed while inside Campsfield House, the detention centre just outside Oxford. 

 

A spokesperson for GEO Group UK Ltd., which manages Campsfield House Immigration Removal Centre, declined to comment on the alleged incidents of violence mentioned in this programme.

 

This investigation was originally filmed for Cherwell24 in Hilary Term 2008.

Design award for Univ boathouse

University College’s new boathouse, which was unveiled to the public at Summer Eights last year, has been awarded a Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA) award.

 

The boathouse, which was designed by Shahriar Nasser for Belsize Architects, was rebuilt at a cost of £2.7m following an arson attack in 1999 that left the old building unusable. The money was raised through a combination of insurance pay-outs and donations from Univ alumni.

 

The building is modern in appearance, featuring panoramic views of the river and a thin copper roof, and includes facilities for boat storage and repair as well as a gym and accomodation. It is used by students from University, Wolfson, St Peter’s and Somerville colleges.

Oxford state admissions fall

 

Oxford has made slow progress in boosting the number of state educated students it takes on despite large Government spending and campaigns by the University, figures show.

 

Performance figures for 2006-7 released by the Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA), show that the proportion of state educated students at Oxford, Cambridge, and Bristol and several other universities actually decreased.

 

In 2006, Oxford had 53% state educated students, with Cambridge having 57.6%. The figures fall well below Government-set benchmarks of 76.7% and 77.4% respectively.

 

The disappointing figures come despite the Government spending large sums on schemes dedicated to widening university access to those from poorer backgrounds.

Sally Hunt, general secretary of the University and College Union, said: “Over the past decade, in England alone, nearly £3 billion has been spent on measures to widen social class participation in higher education.

“We welcome the priority that has been given to this area. But there has been little progress, despite a lot of hard work by universities to attract and retain a wider range of students.

“The bottom line is that the punitive cost of higher education is putting the very students who the Government wishes to attract off applying.”

Oxford also has many access schemes in place, and recently launched an ambitious funding campaign to ensure students from poorer backgrounds are not deterred from applying.

A spokeswoman for Oxford University told the BBC: “For our part, we are doing our utmost to encourage academic ambition from a young age by working with students from 11 up, and by working closely with parents and teachers.

“One element of the picture is making sure that those who do study at Oxford from all groups, especially under-represented groups, are well supported and reach their potential.

“One of the lowest drop-out rates in the country indicates that our efforts in this respect are bearing fruit.”

The period for which the HESA figures have been released coincides with the introduction of top-up fees of £3,000.

Higher Education Minister Bill Rammell emphasised overall figures for UK universities showed that the proportion of students from state schools had increased.

“It is particularly encouraging to see that the proportion of young entrants from the lower socio-economic groups and from state schools has continued to rise and is in fact at their highest ever levels,” he said.

For 2006-7, the proportion of state educated students at university increased from 87.9% to 88.3%.

Both Oxford and Cambridge stress they are doing all they can to widen access. In their defence, some dons have attacked the Government’s targets as unrealistic due to the way in which they are calculated.

 

They also cite inequalities at early stages of schooling and in teacher’s attitudes towards encouraging students to apply to prestigious universities.

 

The figures also show that overall nearly a quarter of undergraduates fail to complete their degree, despite the Government spending large amounts on improving retention. At Bolton University, the drop-out rate has reached almost half.

 

Oxford has one of the lowest drop-out rates in the country, at 1.2% for 2006-7.