Sunday 13th July 2025
Blog Page 2186

Golden Globe Nominations

0

Once again British talent shines through at the announcement on Thursday of the nominations for the Golden Globe Awards 2008.

Topping the bill for the Brits abroad are Kate Winslet and Ralph Fiennes, both garnering two nominantions apiece. Winslet follows in the footsteps of Helen Mirren two years ago and Daniel Day-Lewis last year (we will count him as British ignoring his Irish citizenship, he was born in London and has a very English accent) vying for one of the Best leading performance awards, a real chance for the British to make it three years in a row.

Fiennes meanwhile gains acclaim for his supporting role in The Duchess as well as for his role in the made for TV film Bernard and Doris with Susan Sarandon.
Behind the camera, British directors and screenwriters make up three out of the five nominees in both sections. Sam Mendes, Stephen Daldry and Danny Boyle all vie for the Best Director category with Daldry and Boyle’s pictures both entering the Best Picture list too.

The writers Simon Beaufoy, Sir David Hare and Peter Morgan overwhelm the screenwriting nominees. One would imagine Morgan’s translation of the play Frost/Nixon to be a hot pick to swipe the award come January 11th.
A surprise, however lay in store for Michael Sheen, whom, much tipped for nomination for his portrayal of Sir David Frost in Frost/Nixon, a role he took on with almost chameleon-like ease and yet without ever looking like an imitation, has been past over in the Best Actor category.

This seems no reflection on the film however, which tops the nominations list alongside Doubt starring Meryl Streep and The Curious Case of Benjamin Button starring Brad Pitt (an obsession with absurdly long film titles again shown by Pitt that even The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford did not seemingly satisfy) with five nominations.

Sheen’s co-star Frank Langella however gains well-deserved recognition, taking his place in the Best Actor list, an all-American affair, headed by three stalwarts of the Awards season, Sean Penn, Leonardo DiCaprio and Brad Pitt. A personal wish here lies with success for Sean Penn who stars in the inspiring biopic Milk that has gained him his fifth Golden Globe nomination and hopefully his second win, the first being Mystic River in 2004.

The Globes have entertained some surprise nominees this year, in particular the nominations in the ‘musical or comedy’ categories. Here Ben Stiller’s Tropic Thunder gains supporting actor nods to Tom Cruise’s turn as an unrecognisable studio executive and Robert Downey Jr.’s racially confused actor turned soldier; two performances that it would be wonderful to see honoured by the Globes in January.

A surprising British entrant on to the list also is Sally Hawkins, nominated for her role in Mike Leigh’s Happy Go Lucky. This nomination is encouraging in the Golden Globes’ ability to look beyond the big budget world of Hollywood to performances worthy of celebration.

Once again a successful year for the Brits at the Globes, who now look eagerly to the outcomes on January 11th and so too to the Oscars on February 22nd. And in case anyone feels they just haven’t got enough of award fever, we’ve always got the BAFTAS in the meantime. Bring on yet another awards season that looks bright for British film.

Oxford set Cat amongst the pigeons

0

As both teams filed out onto the Twickenham turf, it was fair to say that since the first match 136 years ago, things have certainly changed. Instead of a hastily arranged 20-a-side match in the parks as it was in 1872, the game is now played in front of thousands of cheering students, in one of the finest rugby stadiums on the planet. It is sponsored by a big name company, and is screened live on Sky Sports. The Cambridge side boasted three ex-internationals in the form of the recently recruited Dan Vickerman, former Australia lock, ex-New Zealand centre Mark Ranby and USA scrum-half Doug Rowe. Oxford on their part had the ever-recognisable figure of Anton Oliver in the front row, with Canadian international Stan McKeen adding support at flanker. Cambridge had received tutelage from current Wales assistant coach Sean Edwards, whilst Oxford had been treated to guidance from ex-England manager Brian Ashton. Whichever way you look at it, professionalism has most definitely come to the Varsity Match. It was refreshing therefore, that this years contest turned out to hinge on an outstanding performance from one of the youngest players on the field, who has never played a minute of professional rugby.

The game itself was played under a dreary grey sky, in bitingly cold conditions. Despite a successful season up until then, Steve Hill must have been feeling the pressure. After three consecutive defeats in this fixture for Oxford, the director of rugby may have seen this as his last chance to set the record straight. Although they came into the match in much better form than their light blue counterparts, Cambridge have developed a knack in recent years for saving their best performance for Varsity. However, from the kick off, Oxford seemed to have forgotten about their tag as under-performers in this match, scoring the first try after only 6 minutes. The ball was spread wide after several phases of play until it reached wing Tim Catling, who showed a fine turn of pace to take him past his opposite number, before crashing through the covering tackle of Richards, who will have thought he could have done better. Although unbeknownst to Cambridge at the time, the sight of the young Oxford speedster crossing the line was one which they would have to get used to throughout the rest of the match.

Cambridge didn’t take long to reply however, with Richards making up for his failings in defence by converting a well worked move in the corner. Despite Oxford being given multiple opportunities to build a lead through Cambridge infringing at the breakdown, Tom Gregory was struggling to find his range with the boot, missing a number of early shots at goal. As both sides began to settle into a rhythm, a clear pattern started to develop, with the quality of Oxford’s backs beginning to tell. In comparison, Cambridge, who have clearly suffered this season through the loss of Ross Broadfoot at fly-half, seemed unable to get going in the back line when faced with the Dark Blues’ tireless defence. They began to rely more and more on the strength of their pack, led by the experienced head of ex-Harlequins prop Jon Dawson. Dawson was in fact lucky not to find himself in the bin for 10 minutes after an overenthusiastic tackle nearly decapitated Oxford fly-half Ross Swanson. Although the opposition seemed to target Swanson, who was making his Varsity debut, they may have been better off concentrating on keeping the previous scorer, Catling, under wraps. This point seemed even more justified when the Pembroke man swept in his second try of the afternoon. However, Cambridge still did not learn their lesson, and the first hat trick for 74 years was completed before half time, Catling being the beneficiary of a fine backs move which opened up the gap for him to score from 15 metres out. With Gregory’s aim improving all the time, Oxford stretched the score to 28-10, and it looked like being a very one sided affair. However, a try from Conlan seemed to drag Cambridge back to within contention, before Peter Wright popped up with the ball at the back of a maul. The number eight showed surprising pace to outstrip the defence, before feeding the ever tireless Clarke, who had the legs to get him over the for the try. It was a stark contrast to the elusive running and blinding speed of the other Oxford tries, but only served to highlight the quality of the team from 1 to 15, and proved they were far more than a one dimensional side.

With the score at 33-15, Oxford seemed to take the foot off the gas. The players seemed to be already envisioning lifting the trophy, and the cry of “shoe the tabs” could be heard from a particularly excited group of Oxford Mexicans in the North Stand as they held their footwear aloft. Although they seemed to have been written off by the majority of the crowd, Cambridge proved once again that they should never be underestimated in this fixture. Two tries in quick succession from Wheeler and Wellwood made the score 33-29, and suddenly the Oxford supporters found themselves quickly placing their shoes back on their feet. Whilst it may not have done anything for the fingernails of the Dark Blue faithful, the contest benefited from the Cambridge revival, and the last ten minutes were as tense as any you are likely to see. Thankfully, the Oxford defence was able to repel the final Cambridge onslaught, until the ball was finally hoofed into touch to the delight of half of Twickenham.

With the first win in four years, joy and relief were etched equally onto the faces of the Oxford players, but none of them wore a grin as big as the man who had set Twickenham alight. At a time when the Varsity game is perhaps the most prestigious amateur rugby game left in the world, it seemed fitting that amongst all the international caps and the high profile athletes, it was a relatively unknown student like Catling who stole the spotlight and steered Oxford on their way to victory.

For the Love of Film 4

Look our for our new Film series beginning soon.

St Peter’s on song to claim title

0

After the 7am starts, the endless circuit training and the draining ergs, the end of Michaelmas saw the return of the Christ Church Regatta. As the new boys of the Oxford rowing scene donned their lycra, their coaches looked to the skies, full of memories of last year’s disheartening washout. Thankfully, the threatening clouds which dominated the sky throughout most of the competition failed to cause the same amount of havoc as they did this time twelve months ago. For many of the less well drilled teams who competed in the first few days, the weather was the least of their problems.

Going into the first day of racing everyone was looking to Exeter as the boat which was expected to dominate the week, courtesy of the earlier win at the Nephthys regatta. However, teams such as St John’s A, who had lost to Exeter in the final of that regatta by less than half a length, were keen to make their mark on the water. With both A and B boats being put into the same draw, there were always going to be mismatches, as well as some of the stronger teams having a more favourable draw than their competitors. Despite this, an easy run in was no guarantee of reaching the later stages, which was proved by a strong looking Teddy Hall boat, who managed to scupper their chances of advancing further when they crashed into the bank, amid mass confusion amongst the rowers.

The sight of boats careering into the side of the river, or losing an oar, was a common one in the first few rounds, with many of the races having only one team finish. It was clear, even to people who knew nothing about rowing, that many of the people involved, well, knew nothing about rowing either. There were several teams who had clearly never been out on the river before, and had hardly crossed the start line before they found themselves meandering their way towards an ego bruising crash and an early exit.

However, despite the first half of the regatta throwing up some questionable performances and often laughably one sided results, the Saturday proved to be much more exciting. After Queens A had been defeated in a shock result against St John’s B’s, Exeter were left as the only A boat in their side of the draw, thus almost guaranteeing their place in the final. The other half of the draw however, proved to be much more hotly contested. As the number of boats dwindled throughout the rounds, the quality of rowing increased dramatically, as some of the more accomplished crews finally came head-to-head. St. Peter’s seemed to be establishing themselves as dark horses for the title, as they cruised through their first few encounters untroubled, looking every inch the well trained outfit. The semi-final bought their first real test as it matched them up against Nephthys runners-up St John’s, who had had a similarly comfortable run-up to the race. With both teams looking like strong contenders to try and topple Exeter, the crowds thronged the edge of the river as they set off. Despite being unable to separate the two boats for the first half of the race, St Peter’s gradually pulled out into a half length lead, which they refused to relinquish for almost the entire rest of the race. Although a huge St John’s effort in the last 50m made a comeback look possible, the boys at the bottom of Norrington table held on, and in the process booked themselves a place in the final.

After this draining encounter, despite St Peter’s strong showing, many still fancied Exeter, with their previous win this term already under their belts, to walk away with it in the final. But their attempt to take a clean sweep of novice silverware this term was thwarted by what can only be described as a monumental effort on the part of their opponents. The fact that Exeter had not been properly tested until the final may have played a part, with complacency perhaps creeping into the mindset of the previously undefeated team. It certainly looked that way, as they came out of the blocks sluggishly, immediately surrendering a lead, one which they could not claw back no matter how hard they pulled. As the triumphant St Peter’s team crossed the line, arms aloft, you could see their coach standing on the bridge, regaling the crowd with his dulcet tones. Whether this was witchcraft in an underhand attempt to help his charges we cannot know. We can at least be sure that on that Saturday afternoon his team managed to magic the trophy out from under Exeter’s noses, who until that moment seemed to have been convinced of their invincibility. But as that melodic voiced floated down the river banks there was no doubt as to who had won; nor that it was a fully deserved outcome.

 

Nobel economist addresses University

0

The nobel prize winning economist, Muhammad Yunus delivered this year’s Romanes Lectures at the Sheldonian this year.He gave lecture, entitled ‘A poverty-free world: When? How?’, to guests at the Sheldonian on Tuesday 2nd December.
He focused particularly on the current global financial crisis and spoke of his
vision of a world free from poverty.
Yunus, originally from Bangladesh, founded Grameen Bank, which provides credit to the poorest people in Bangladesh.
Yunus and Grameen Bank were jointly awarded the Nobel peace prize in 2006 “fortheir efforts to create economic and social development from below.”
The Romanes Lecture occurs annually at the University. The first was given in
1892. Past speakers have included William Gladstone, Winston Churchill and IrisMurdoch.
A copy of each year’s lecture can be found at the Bodleian library

Infertile academic seeks Oxbridge donor

0

An infertile Oxford graduate has placed adverts at Oxford and Cambridge, asking for an egg donor.

Sally Adams has placed adverts in the Oxford Mail and its Cambridge counterpart, asking only for donors who are university graduates and under 32.

Adams, who studied zoology at Oxford, said she hoped to find a donor who is “educated, intellectual and possibly with connections with the colleges”.

She has been criticised by some for attempting to create a ‘designer baby.’ Experts have pointed out that intellect is only partly based on genetics and that using an egg from Oxbridge would not guarantee an intelligent child.

A second year Oxford student said, “I think it’s bit pathetic really. If she’s that desperate for a child surely she should be delighted to accept a donor regardless of their intellect. Andbesides, there’s no guarantee a clever mother means a clever child”.

Adams has already found an appropriate source of sperm.

 

 

Wadham elections violated constitution

0

Michaelmas elections in the Wadham College Student Union have been beset by problems. The online voting system did not work properly, and an unconstitutional voting method was used instead.

Wadham’s election, already delayed, was conducted using a first-past-the-post (FPTP) system, instead of single transferable voting (STV), as mandated by the Union’s constitution. Under STV, votes are redistributed according to secondary preferences when there is no outright majority.

“Paper voting would be too difficult”

However, in these elections FPTP was used. Under this system the candidate with the most votes is immediately declared winner, and additional preferences are disregarded. FPTP was used because, according to one source: “doing multiple preference with paper voting would be too difficult.”

William McCallum, Wadham’s JCR president, explained that the lack of online voting was due to “problems with the web officer.” This position was to be elected in the 4th week, but “no one ran”.

Madeleine Pullen, a 2nd year student said: “I didn’t vote in any Wadham elections this term as they weren’t on the internet and I’m too busy in the daytime to make it to Wadham to vote. I’m not very well up on voting systems but i didn’t even realise it would be different to normal. Also elections being late caused confusion and affected me personally as I had a housing issue and don’t really know who to go to!”

McCallum added that elections were conducted using first-past-the-post system in order to save time, as “the majority of our officers are finalists and we have to be fair to them”.

“The election did not conform to SU regulations”

The heavily contested race for Food and Amenities Officers was most affected by the voting abnormalities. The election resulted in Graham Healy-Day and Cormac Sullivan winning by 3 votes. This meant that second preferences could have easily changed the outcome of the election. Michael Teckman, one of the runner-ups for the position, commented he was “certainly upset to lose by such a small margin, especially as the election did not conform to SU regulations.”

Teckman also pointed out that the elections would be more effective with the online voting system, “(I) feel the thing that really limited our power as candidates was the failure of the internet voting system. This meant we lost many valuable votes from people living out, and those too busy to make the allotted slots.”

“A perfectly reasonable job”

One student filled in a demand for the Election Tribunal to consider re-running of the election for the position. An Election Tribunal will be elected at the beginning of Hilary Term to decide whether to repeat the ballot.

Adrienne Joy, another candidate, commented: “Whilst the system used to run the elections wasn’t ideal, I think the first past the post system did a perfectly reasonable job to elect the candidates that people wanted. The fact that all this has to be rerun despite the best efforts of SU officers to get it done before the end of Michaelmas just seems like a complete waste of time.”

Returning Officer Charlotte Houldcroft declined to comment on the situation.

 

 

Omkar suspended from Union

0

Ex-Union Treasurer Krishna Omkar has had his membership of the Society suspended for three terms following an election tribunal that took place on Saturday and Sunday last week.

The tribunal was called after Omkar accused eight Union members, including an ex-President, the incoming President and the President Elect, of having violated Rule 33 of the Society’s rulebook which states that candidates must run independently and without systematic solicitation of votes.

“President Elect and ex-President accused”

The first charge was brought against ex-Librarian Leo Marcus Wan, Librarian Tom Hartley, Treasurer-Elect Nouri Verghese and Secretary Anna Williams who were accused of forming a slate in the Michaelmas Term elections.

Omkar also accused President Elect Corey Dixon and ex-Standing Committee member Stuart Cullen and stated that ex-President Luke Tryl had helped them by soliciting votes.

Union President Charlie Holt was also accused of ‘lining’ for candidates running on Friday of seventh week.

All of the above defendants were found innocent of the charges. The panel concluded that Omkar’s allegations against Tryl had been brought forward on “unfounded and malicious” grounds.

However, the candidate for Secretary’s Committee, Balliol PPEist Kanishka Narayan, was disqualified after being found guilty of electronic campaigning.
The Secretary’s Committee election will now be recounted.

“Evidence might have been obtained illegally”

Omkar had obtained evidence of an email conversation between Anna Williams and Nouri Verghase where the elections were discussed, but it was rejected by the tribunal on the grounds that it might have been obtained illegally.
The tribunal made no suggestion that it was Omkar himself who had illegally obtained the evidence.

Returning Officer Oliver Linch stated that the panel felt it to be an issue of “natural justice”, that it would “set a bad precedent” and might have a negative impact on future Union elections.

However, Omkar has attacked the panel for refusing to acknowledge “substantial and crucial evidence of a flagrant and open breach of the rules.”
He added, “this tribunal’s proceedings unfortunately only served to re-establish my belief that this is a Society which maintains one set of rules for certain individuals and another set of rules for others.”

He argued that he was found guilty of electoral malpractice following the elections of Michaelmas 2007, in which he was elected president, on the basis of “an email from an unidentified source”.

“Cullen claims to have been drunk”

It was thought that Cullen would be found guilty because Omkar had record of a facebook exchange between the two where they discussed the Michaelmas elections.

However, Cullen was able to successfully cast doubt as to whether the exchange accurately reflected the situation, claiming to have been drunk when the conversation took place.

One ex-Standing Committee member has said that the verdict of the tribunal was “against expectations”, whilst defendant Leo Marcus Wan suggested that Omkar had been “perfectly reasonable” in bringing the charges.

“He thought what had happened to him was unfair, and that everyone should be held to the same standard, which is perfectly reasonable”.

However, Tryl stated that Omkar “deserved to have his membership suspended”, adding “I don’t think that tribunals should be used as a political tool”.

“Assaulted by Union members”

Omkar has also made allegations that he was accosted outside the Union buildings on his way to make his complaint. He claimed to have been verbally assaulted by Holt, Williams, Verghese and Tryl.

He said, “Mr Holt pushed me out onto the street, I was surrounded by and verbally abused by the others, Mr Tryl calling me a ‘stupid bastard’, and threatening to call the police (eventually summoning the Union security guard on duty to threaten me further) if I attempted to submit my complaint.”

Holt has denied this claim, stating that “It is categorically untrue; it is also a reverse of the fact” adding that Omkar is banned from the Union buildings.
“Security escorted him out, we didn’t verbally abuse him, in fact quite the opposite; he got quite aggressive.”

Krishna Omkar now has 48 hours to appeal against the verdict of the tribunal. However Leo Marcus Wan has said, “I don’t think he would have a chance of being successful”.

It has been suggested that Omkar’s case may have been affected by the fact that he did not return to the tribunal after it broke for lunch.

Members present at the tribunal have suggested that he neglected to go back because he felt the tribunal would not go his way.

Fellow proposes all dons be made professors

0

An academic at Oxford University has proposed that all dons holding permanent posts should be given the title of “professor.”

 

Nicholas Bamforth, a fellow in law at Queens’ College, put forward the suggestion in response to a consultation by a university task force on an academics promotions scheme. He wants the term to operate as a job-description.

 

“Give everyone the title”

 

He claimed last month that “The simplest and fairest way forward, given that our major competitors in North America do so, may simply be to give everyone … the title professor.” He has suggested that statutory or personal chairs could be recognised as posts of special distinction within this title.
For decades academics at Oxford have complained about the promotions policy. The Task Force on Academic Employment has now suggested that personal promotions be introduced for small numbers of people.

 

However, Dr Bamforth argues that the promotion scheme suggested is too complicated as it results in three types of professor – statutory professors, professors promoted under the new scheme and “titular professors” – all with different teaching responsibilities.

 

He also asserts that the task force’s proposal is not fair to existing holders of titles, who have already undergone a stringent selection process, requiring them to depend on external referees.

 

“It is unclear whether his proposal is feasible”

 

In an article published in the Oxford Magazine last week, he said, “It does not seem fair to require them to reapply with the likelihood that many will be promoted to a grade below the title they currently hold (i.e. reader rather than professor) and many will receive no substantive promotion at all.”

 

Whilst his proposal has been acknowledged by colleagues, it has been contested. Dr Justine Pila, a University Lecturer in Intellectual Property at St Catherine’s College, said, “Nick Bamforth’s proposal has the principal merit of meeting colleagues’ desire for a system of recognition comprehensible to other institutions, while also reflecting the flat structure of our academic community. It is however unclear whether his proposal for distinguishing statutory/personal chairs (with reference, for example, to the named title of the chair) is feasible. Personally, I am happy as a ‘Dr’.”

 

The Task Force on Academic Employment’s briefing note says that it “notes with considerable interest” Dr Bamforth’s proposal.

 

Oxford’s Space Age

0

Oxford academics have helped create the Venus Express, a spacecraft devoted solely to studying planet Venus.

The probe came into action recently. It takes photos using ultraviolet and infrared cameras which provide data on the atmosphere of the planet. This allows scientists to compare what the planet looks like at different wavelengths, revealing the physical conditions of the planet.

“A puzzle for nearly a century”

Professor Fred Taylor, one of the Venus Express scientists and a researcher at Oxford University said, “The features seen on Venus in ultraviolet light have been a puzzle to astronomers for nearly a century. These new images have revealed the structure in the clouds that produces them and shows how they result from complex meteorological behaviour.”

Oxford’s relationship with the European Space Agency (ESA) is to be strengthened soon with the opening of a major research centre at the Harwell Science and Innovation Campus in Oxfordshire.

“New models, techniques, equipment”

The new centre will focus on space robotics and the changing atmosphere of the Earth. These will help European scientific institutions develop advanced climate change models. It will also provide new techniques and equipment for improved planetary exploration.

Sharon Bowles, Lib Dem MEP for Oxfordshire commented, “This recognises the tremendous contribution that science in the UK has made to the European space effort. I’m confident also that the centre’s climate change focus will be bolstered by the UK’s acknowledged excellence in climate science.”