Sunday 14th September 2025
Blog Page 2266

SEH leaps to athletic victory

0

Warm but windy conditions at Iffley Road saw Teddy Hall romp to victory in Saturday’s Athletics Cuppers Competition. Amassing 202.5 points, Hall finished far clear of Magdalen, who scored 105 points for second place. Oriel earned 69 points to narrowly clinch the bronze medal ahead of fourth placed Keble. The event saw seasoned OUAC athletes warming up for the upcoming season alongside newcomers, with encouraging performances from all ahead of the Varsity Match.

Danny Eckersley opened proceedings on track, finding some early season form to convincingly win the 400m hurdles in 56.1s, beating Aaron Mason into second place. Eckersley later proved he was also in fine form on the flat, running a Personal Best 51.4s to take third place behind Jonan Boto (50.6s) and Nick Cook (51.2s).

In the field, 2007 Women’s Blues Captain Frances Smithson opened her outdoor season in style, winning the Long Jump in a Blues worthy 5.50m. Julia Lange traded her middle distance spikes to jump 4.97m and finish second, proving she is just as talented in the field as on the track. Steph Poulson and Laura Groom finished third and fourth respectively, and then took first and second in the Triple Jump, to continue accumulating points for Teddy Hall.

One of the best races of the tournament saw yet another Hall athlete, Richard Hildick-Smith take on Dane Austin in a close-fought 800m. Tightly packed after a 58s first lap, Hildick-Smith moved into the lead with 350m to go and kicked down the back straight. Austin challenged hard up the home straight but had left himself too much to do; Hildick-Smith taking the title in a Personal Best 1:55.8s.

Dominique Smith took both women’s sprint titles, pushed all the way by Sally Hughes in the 100m before romping home to take the 200m in a swift 26.5s into a strong headwind. Emily Binner returned to action after almost a year on the sidelines to win the 400m, completing a clean sweep for Magdalen in the women’s sprints. James Osun-Samni won the men’s 100m in 11.8s in tough conditions, and will now be hoping to convert his speed into form on the jumps runway.

Bethany Staniland completed a clean sweep of the women’s throws, demonstrating Blues form by recording 11.14m with the shot, 34.90m with the javelin and 34.47m with the discus. Teddy Hall’s Courtney Brown threw 28.69m in the discus and took second place in the javelin to give OUAC Captain Steph Madgett an enviable array of options ahead of Varsity selection.

The men’s throws were a familiar story, with Teddy Hall accumulating numerous victories. Ben Cossey’s 34.32m was enough to win the discus, and Phil Satterthwaite was victorious in the javelin with a throw of 43.95m. Elsewhere in the field, Simon Dewsbury (1.85m) upset pre-event favourite Alex Skouby (1.80m) by winning the high jump, although both will be confident of defeating Cambridge in two weeks time.

The relays rounded off proceedings with some entertaining battles, most notably in the 4x100m which saw an OUAC women’s team challenge the OUBC men. Despite the boys’ pre-race confidence, the girls’ strong start and smooth changeovers put the rookie athletes under too much pressure, and the girls streaked home to victory.

OUAC Men’s Captain Phil Duggleby said he was “very impressed with the day’s performances, and confident about the weeks ahead”. The Blues are currently in preparation for the BUSA Outdoor Championships this weekend for further practice, before what promises to be a scintillating home Varsity Match on May 17.

Interview: John Hurt

0

John Hurt appears to be the quintessential English actor, complete with regal use of the Queen’s English and a moustache that would be the envy of Kitchener. It was all a bit intimidating to a student reporter, challenged with finding something interesting to ask this stalwart of the industry at the very end of weeks of non-stop promotion interviews. I feared that the radio interviewer before me might have pushed Hurt to the outer reaches of his tether by asking him to record some soundbites for the morning breakfast show: not a bit of it; he was instantly welcoming, offering me a drink and ushering me over to a small table to sit down with him and chat one-on-one.

Hurt was clearly enthusiastic about The Oxford Murders, his new film co-starring Elijah Wood about a series of murders committed in Oxford that are linked by a mathematical theme. He was adamant that the film re-wrote the conventional murder mystery template by unveiling the action, not like a Miss Marple mystery where the pieces fit together like a puzzle, but by unfolding events before your eyes, revealing twists that you could never possibly have seen coming. Hurt denied that the plot was woven over stereotypical Oxford scenery of tweed-wearing dons and pampered public school kids, instead saying that the film was about developing the idiosyncrasies of each character in a way that did not conform to any preconceived perceptions, although he added that if you considered his natural accent as being traditional Oxford then there’s not a lot he could do about it.

Hurt plays the character of Arthur Seldom, a brilliant maths professor, but did little research for the role, saying only that he spoke to a few people at New College and nothing more, demonstrating the confidence he has in his ability to portray the character on his own terms and in the ‘brilliant writing’.

Although an actor held in great regard, Hurt profusely denied my suggestion that he might now be at the stage in his career where he could pick and choose roles. He made it clear that this is a common myth held about actors of his ilk, saying that there are not many roles about for someone of his age, and that of these, very few are worth pursuing.

In the same vein he bemoaned the state of the British film industry, his view being that ‘this government is doing nothing to help us’, and that although British films were always a challenge to make, it is ‘almost impossible’ to get the funding now. With this depressing indictment of the UK, I asked for his view on Hollywood to which he replied that the big film studios are now doing market research before they make films to ensure they maximise profit, rather than producing movies because they have a director’s passion and an original idea.

‘Surely that’s the wrong way round to do things’ he said; I’m inclined to agree with him.

Neighbourhood Watch: Figment

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

With some processed meat and a few hours kip on board, Figment’s bassist/vocalist Sandy is damn happy. Their highly anticipated Wadstock slot has gone without a hitch.

However, it wasn’t looking quite so rosy pre-set: ‘I wasn’t sure how it was going to go,’ he muses, ‘We felt we really had something to prove after last year.’ Despite sending the crowd into a rip-roaring frenzy the band felt they had let themselves down a little; a few beers too many leading to what they perceived to be an error-strewn set.

This year however things were rather different. Not only were they stars of the show; this time they feel they’ve earned the morning-after accolades. ‘We feel really proud, this time when people say ‘you were amazing’ I can just say thanks and not feel guilty about it.’ This time it was tight, it was frantic and it was the highlight of a truly amazing day.

So what next for Figment? It’s been a big year for the band with a 10-date tour in France just finished. ‘We’re really looking forward to writing new stuff, we’ve been relentlessly gigging with the same set for a while now and I’ve got tons of ideas; might even be looking to develop a more mature sound.’ Right now though, they just can’t seem to get signed. ‘We just can’t seem to play to the right people.’

If there’s any justice in music this stunning three-piece will be signed before they develop past the raw buzzing rock machine they are now.  Check them out on their myspace. Like now.

Jack McManus – ‘Either Side of Midnight’

0

4 stars out of 5
I must say I had several preconceptions when I received Either Side of Midnight. The understated style attempted on the album cover and McManus’ ‘cool’ projections in the media and on the CD case filled me with unease. Upon beginning the opening tracks I was expecting chirpy and inoffensive, yet bland and unoriginal songs. ‘A solid three stars’, I sighed inwardly as I sat down. As the stellar-based measure of goodness above shows, my
fears were only partially borne out.

Either Side of Midnight is packed from start to finish with upbeat melodies created by McManus and his piano that are truly pleasing to listen to. Jack’s voice is pleasant if unremarkable given the number and quality of musicians of his style around at the moment. Instrumental lines are generally piano led, but acoustic guitar and strings are used to create a rich sound more frequently as the album progresses.

Standout tracks including ‘Milky Way’ and ‘Living in a Suitcase’ are amongst the more upbeat songs packing catchy hooks, the most memorable melodies with suitably high tempos. ‘Fine Time To Lose Your Mind’ and ‘You Can Make It Happen’ fall at the other extreme of the album with attempts at a more moody and epic sound that, while not awful by any stretch, still fall short of the quality of other tracks.

Either Side of Midnight fills a niche situated somewhere between Maroon 5 and The Feeling, and with influences including Jack Johnson and Newton Faulkner. This is one reason why McManus’ debut album falls short of receiving five stars. The music is without serious flaws and is perfect for relaxation on a summer’s day but the same can be said of dozens of artists. Jack McManus is a perfect example of happy but inconsequential music.

Excess baggage

0

We are destroying our planet. It’s an idea with which we all ought to be painfully familiar. It may sit uncomfortably with our lavish western religion of consumerism,  but it’s something we’ve all got to get used to. If we’re actually going to do something about the environmental disaster that we all of us in our hearts know is coming, then this mandates changes. Some will be more drastic than others, and some must necessarily hurt. What society really needs is a solution that, while meaningful, impinges on our lives as little as possible: a plastic bag tax.

Before the reactionary-minded nanny-state-haters among you balk, let me give you a few statistics. Last year, an estimated 13 billion plastic carrier bags were given away to shoppers in the UK, 217 plastic bags for every English citizen. Worldwide, the figure is closer to 500 billion. Though these bags are called disposable, that is precisely what they are not. Instead, each bag will take around 1,000 years to degrade. They remain as unsightly blots on our landscape, an unhappy reminder of our sheer apathy towards the well-being of our planet.

Consider also how plastic bags are made. Most plastic bags are made from  high density polyethylene, produced from ever-precious crude oil.  Most of these bags are made in south-east Asia, and by the time they reach merry old England, they will have travelled over 8,000 miles, with a massive carbon footprint to boot.

We are all guilty in this matter. We all know that we should recycle that empty wine bottle, reuse that carrier bag, turn off that light switch; but we don’t. We need a persistent nudge in the right direction. As far as plastic bags go, the Irish government has the right idea. In 2001 they introduced a plastic bag tax. Before the levy was introduced Ireland consumed 1.2 billion plastic bags, or 316 per person. After a year, plastic bag consumption had fallen by a massive 90%, saving 18,000,000 litres of oil in the process. These figures speak for themselves.

At last, our government is catching up, with Gordon Brown last week warning supermarkets that if they don’t cut down on plastic bags, he would force a change. My question to Gordon is: why wait?

 

Supermarkets are monolithic organisations, reluctant to change. They fear that a charge on plastic bags would send their customers scurrying away to their competitors. The fairest way to force change would be to mandate a universal charge in every supermarket, thus levelling the playing field. A reduction in plastic bag usage isn’t going to save the planet, but it would be a step in the right direction.

 

‘Every little helps’ they say. Well, let’s start with our addiction to plastic bags.

A cruel injustice

In the early hours of 8 March 2008 Alejandro Ordaz Moreno, a PhD student, was seized at gunpoint as he left a bar in Seville. He violently resisted what he believed to be a kidnap attempt, but his assailants were plainclothes police, and he’s now been charged with assaulting them.

 

The case highlights how our beliefs and prior experiences shape our interpretations of events. Moreno was born and grew up in Mexico, which has the highest kidnap rate in the world (an estimated 1,200 in 2007). With such a background, it is unsurprising that Moreno interpreted the events of March 8th as attempt to kidnap him, and reacted accordingly.

 

The police’s violent response to Moreno’s attempt to escape is more understandable when viewed in light of their belief that Moreno was a suspect in a serious and violent sexual assault case. He bore a considerable physical resemblance to the suspect, and was walking through a quiet part of town late at night.  He was going home: they thought he was on the prowl.  This misapprehension guided their violent responses to his escape attempt. In fact, both Moreno and the officers interpreted the situation wrongly, but they were both making valid interpretations of the facts available to them: neither of them should be blamed for the mistake.

I heard about the Moreno case from a friend who emailed me the story, which was published in Spanish in the online edition of the Seville local paper. This ‘peer-to-peer’ reporting is archetypal of 21st century ‘viral media’. Viral media perpetuates an illusion of omniscience: the internet puts the world at our fingertips, and so it’s easy to believe that we have access to ‘the truth’ about an issue. However, our choice of media, and the extent to which we trust it, biases our experience. We must accept that both individuals and nations have imperfect knowledge of the world. That acceptance will foster tolerance of different interpretations of the same events, and of the ensuing mistakes.

 

The current trend for apportioning blame following any mistake has led our governments to use criminal charges to intimidate their adversaries into accepting the blame. The publication of the IPCC report on the Forest Gate shootings in 2006 coincided neatly with the arrest of the victim on child pornography charges. The charges were quietly dropped 2 months later, but the arrest quelled any public sympathy which might have been aroused by the report’s admission that an innocent man was shot by police. By charging Moreno, the police have given themselves a bargaining chip when dealing with him, and have dissipated public support for him.

 

This unsavoury and crude approach can only contribute to resentment in the long term.

Celebrating ethnic cleansing?

 

Sixty years ago this month, the State of Israel was declared in historic Palestine. Less than a year after this declaration, when a ceasefire was declared, Zionist forces were in control of 78% of Palestine. Yet the creation of this State came at unspeakable cost to the Palestinian people, who had been living there continuously for centuries. 750,000 Palestinians were ethnically cleansed from their homeland, fleeing from the Stern Gang and the Haganah militias and the newly created Israel Defence Forces.

Many were chased directly from their villages; others fled, hearing of the massacres inflicted upon other Palestinians, such as those of Deir Yassin, where over 100 people, including at least 50 women and children, were brutally and systematically murdered. In order to ensure that those who were fleeing the terror would never be able to return to their homes, 418 Palestinian villages were destroyed. Neither their inhabitants, nor their descendants, have ever been allowed to return home, in direct contravention of UN Resolution 194, which demands that ‘refugees wishing to return to their homes and live at peace with their neighbours should be permitted to do so.’

To describe this ethnic cleansing and the brutal destruction of their homeland Palestinians use the word Nakba – catastrophe.

For the first two weeks of May, the Israeli Cultural Society (ICS) is inviting Oxford to join them in celebration of Israel’s 60th birthday. We are appalled. The state of Israel was built on the burning ruins of Palestinian homes, and is ensuring the Nakba continues to this day. Any celebration of its ‘birth’ is an open and defiant justification of the ethnic cleansing of Palestine. Is this what we are being asked to celebrate?

Since its establishment, Israel has continually enacted discriminatory policies towards the Palestinian population both inside and outside its borders. It has prevented internally displaced persons from returning home, and the legal system and government of the Israeli state discriminates against Palestinians on vital issues such as the purchasing of land, building permission, economic assistance for development towns – the list goes on. Is this what we are being asked to celebrate?

The Palestinians of the West Bank have lived under occupation for more than 40 years, an occupation which poisons and stifles every aspect of their lives. Since this occupation began, Israel has attempted to colonise the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, by building Jewish-only settlements on Palestinian land, and creating a segregated road system – with certain roads reserved for Jewish settlers, and other, inferior roads for Palestinians. Freedom of movement is severely restricted by the checkpoints, road blocks and barriers which choke the West Bank. The segregation wall, which is just the latest attempt to annex Palestinian land, surrounds cities such as Qalqilyah – population over 40,000 – leaving its inhabitants just one entrance. When they are allowed in or out, that is. The wall separates villagers from their farmland, students from their schools, patients from their hospitals, and tears families and communities apart. And let us not forget the policy of house demolitions, which since 1967 has claimed over 12,000 Palestinian homes, leaving over 70,000 people without shelter and traumatised. Is this what we are being asked to celebrate?

On the 5th of May, camels will be arriving on Broad Street as part of the festivities. Such a superficial gesture ignores and trivialises the tragedy suffered by the Middle East; meanwhile the falafel and shisha pipes, sold to us as Israeli culture, represent Israeli appropriation of Palestinian heritage, which is slowly and stealthilyeroding the Palestinian nation’s link to its homeland and denying it the dignity a society needs to survive.

One event in particular is cruelly ironic – a talk entitled ‘Israeli Medical Achievements – Saving Lives Worldwide’. Why is it, we wonder, that Israel saves lives worldwide, but regularly refuses to allow food aid, fuel and medicine into the Gaza strip? What is Israel, which controls Gaza’s borders, airspace and coastline, doing to save Gazan lives? Just last week, the United Nations reported that it has been forced to halt desperately needed food aid distribution, upon which more than 1.1m Gazans are dependent, because Israeli-imposed sanctions have created massive fuel shortages.

It is with bemusement and outrage that we find ourselves being asked to celebrate 60 years of Israel’s existence. If the ICS wish to celebrate ethnic cleansing, racism, and the daily persecution of an entire nation, we will most certainly not be joining them. Oxford Students’ Palestine Society believe this is a reason for protest, not celebration, and we invite you to stand with us.

The Loose Salute – ‘Tuned to Love’

0

3 stars out of 5All we care about is rock and roll, the next big swell, which party to go to. We just wanna let the sunshine in.’

The central lyric of ‘From Head to Sandy Toes’ neatly sums up The Loose Salute’s attitude to music and indeed life in general. Singer, songwriter and drummer Ian McCutcheon, best known for his work in Slowdive and Mojave 3, formed the band, aiming for their music to reflect their lifestyle surfing in Cornwall.

The Loose Salute make little attempt to disguise their influences, which are firmly grounded in ’60s beat-pop, from the first Beach Boys-esque chords of ‘Death Club’ to the pop of the Monkees from whom the band take their name. However, in spreading themselves so thinly over their influences the band’s sound is highly derivative.

Whilst the lyrics are somewhat unimaginative, their delivery cannot be faulted. McCutcheon’s vocals are reminiscent of Elliott Smith and when Lisa Billson assumes vocal duties the effect is stunning as she shifts from melancholy languor to upbeat ecstasy. This is especially evident on the beautiful final ballad ‘Ship on the Ocean’.

The instrumentation on the album is greatly varied, but not so far as to seem like a gimmick and detract from the songs’ overall effect. Tracks are perfectly augmented by steel guitar, banjo, sax and the trumpet solo as ‘Photographs and Tickets’ reaches its climax is a particular highlight.

What’s wrong with an album that chooses not to push musical boundaries? This album shows that there’s great merit in taking a scenic trip over previously tread musical ground when it takes the listener on a picturesque journey to a sunset on a Cornwall beach.

Interview: Pendulum

0

 

 

Drum and bass purists may scorn, but groups such as Pendulum provide welcome relief from a music scene saturated with generic indie bands. Tracks such as ‘Granite’ and ‘Slam’ have propelled the Perth-based band onto the global music scene, with upcoming new album In Silico hopefully cementing their position at the forefront of the genre and bass. When a band is accorded the dubious honour of having their songs played at a Merton bop, along with firm favourites such as Busted and Avril Lavigne, then they truly have arrived.

Pendulum are perhaps most (in)famous for blending different musical styles and moving away from the core drum and bass sound. On their music-making process, the band say: ‘It develops naturally, but we tend to write a lot more music that we’re going to use. Then we listen back to it, as fans, and choose the ones that really grab us.’ Obvious enough, maybe, but combining such disparate elements as brass fanfares, rap vocals and spacey keyboards requires more than just a good ear. Or does it? The band say: "We listen to a lot of different music, and when we hear something with a vibe that we think could work with our sound, we’re not afraid to experiment and see if the two sounds will work together. More often than not, they do."

Experimentation is not limited to creating the music. Pendulum have, over the past few months, played more and more of their sets as a live band, instead of hiding behind decks. This creates a different energy and is something that they are enthusiastic about. "When DJ-ing, you’re playing out mastered tracks so there isn’t much room for creativity. But when you play live you’re creating the tracks from the ground up, so you can change them as much as you like, night after night. We find this fulfilling and it gets the crowd more involved."

Asking about influences from a band which uses samples from Spider Man 2 and the original Charlie And The Chocolate Factory was probably not the greatest of ideas, and true to form Pendulum throw up a surprise or two. Despite being a drum and bass band, they comment that "We don’t listen to much drum and bass." You have to respect their bravery, at least. In spite of this, they add "but there’re definitely a couple of artists who we never keep our eyes and ears off for too long, because they always come up with something fresh and inspiring – Dillinja and Hazard would be on the list for sure."

Pendulum are known for pushing genre boundaries, and the new album promises no change in this attitude. Will the guys ever find their sound and stick to it? Apparently not. "We all have far too much ADD to ever stick to one sound. As soon as we finish a tune we’re already wanting to be working on the next one."

You may love them or hate them, view them as creative geniuses or the drum and bass equivalent of cheese, but Pendulum can’t be faulted in their creative drive or determination to explore new musical ground.

Review: The Sabotage Café

0

"These things are hard to say. I’m not sure what’s true and what isn’t."

 

This is the opening of The Sabotage Café, Joshua Furst’s tale of a dysfunctional family relationship born of painful memories and mental illness. Welcome to Dinkytown, Minneapolis, scene of the 1980s punk rebellion from which Julia has escaped, and still home to an underground world of narcotics, anarchy and tempestuous youth.

Into this meleé runs Cheryl, Julia’s 16-year-old daughter, escaping the confines of suburbia and her mother’s oppressive presence. As we are drawn into Cheryl’s world of drugs, sex and squalor mixed with hashed-up ideals about the demise of ‘the establishment’, we also journey into Julia’s past, picking up the pieces of a life diverted and damaged. How much of her experience is real, and how much is imagined by the fearful and delusional Julia remains unclear, as Julia’s disturbed mind produces illusions which become increasingly difficult to distinguish from flashback and reality.

What Furst does brilliantly is portray through projected emotion and internalised argument the lonely struggle of each character to find meaning in their situation, or to deny it. The gung-ho bravado of the boys Cheryl ends up with is nothing more than a face for their insecurities, the outcome of youth burdened by their parents’ blunders as well as their own.

Furst’s blunt and epithetic manner  shocks rather than draws sympathy at first, but his open style creates the sense of hopelessness in which the book’s characters dwell, empty and needy, clawing into each other’s lives as if some solace can be found by living vicariously. His compassionate exploration of life in the grimy fallout of a failed revolution and the desire to obliterate the self is a first novel to be proud of, and one that provokes.