OUSU will reject £8,000 in advertising revenue from UBS next year in protest at the company’s links to the Sudanese government.UBS has come under extensive criticism over its assistance in launching PetroChina, a subsidiary of the China National Petroleum Company, on the Shanghai stock exchange. The CNPC provides financial support to the Sudanese government and military.The student union is seeking alternative advertisers for the Oxford and Cambridge Careers Guide 2008. The Oxford Student will also avoid using UBS advertisements from Michaelmas 2008. UBS has used both publications in the past for its graduate recruitment.Responding to the vote, Lincoln student and Aegis Trust Student Chair Mark Darby said, “We’re very pleased that OUSU is taking a stand against immoral corporations. Students have always been at the forefront of ethical campaigns against multinational companies and we hope to keep it that way.But concerns have been raised about the financial implications of the move, which has the potential to leave a substantial hole in OUSU’s budget for next year. OUSU’s Vice- President of Finance, Rich Hardiman, nevertheless played down the importance of the loss of income, stressing, “These things are always under review – the ideal situation is that they stop underwriting genocide.UBS declined to comment directly on OUSU’s decision but reiterated previous denials of any direct link to the situation in Darfur. The company’s website boasts a substantial section on corporate responsibility and claims, “We take human rights standards into account when vetting potential clients.” Amnesty International has already dismissed the distinction made by UBS between PetroChina and the CNPC as a “legal fig leaf.”by James Stafford

Oxford is receiving sponsorship contracts from arms companies worth at least £19 million, a report published last week has revealed.The report, Study War No More, was published jointly by the Campaign Against Arms Trade and the Fellowship of Reconciliation, and looked at the contracts of 26 universities between 2001 and 2006.Oxford has received funding for 124 projects, the third most of any of the universities surveyed. It has received the 8th largest amount of money.Daniel Lowe, OUSU Environment and Ethics Officer, said the funding could contradict OUSU’s campaign for Socially Responsible Investment. He said, “Some years ago, OUSU began a campaign for socially responsible investment. The committee doesn’t ban investments per se, but provides a framework for removing unethical investments without harming the University’s revenue. What is ethical will be determined by committee policy, but the arms trade is one of the most likely contenders to be included.”Rolls Royce and QinetiQ are amongst the University’s top research sponsors. Their business interests include the study of marine electrical systems, development of fuel systems, and defence and security.In the past, they have worked with Oxford to investigate the properties of nickel alloys and contributed to research of computational fluid dynamics. Along with research grants, arms companies were found to have sponsored a number of bursaries, industrial placements and careers fairs.In 2005 the University laid out the benefits of the funding when announcing a collaboration with QinetiQ. A spokesperson said, “University and the company [will be] working together to identify areas of common technological interest. The partnership will allow QinetiQ to access the science and technology expertise of Oxford, and maintain an active involvement in its research innovations.”A spokesperson for the University stressed that the companies are not necessarily military ones, saying, “The legitimacy of the report relies entirely on whether its definition of ‘military’ projects is sound.”According to one analysis, the Ministry of Defence is in need of new weapons and University research is instrumental to the development of these.Professor Hartley of York University’s Centre for Defence Economics said, “Production of such weapons requires both research and development. Research precedes development and generates new technical knowledge… Development involves engineering design, manufacture and testing which might result in the eventual production of the equipment for the Armed Forces.”by Omotola Akerele

An American court has upheld Oxford don Tariq Ramadan’s exclusion from the United States, marking another defeat in the Muslim academic’s fight to enter the country.Judge Paul A. Crotty adjudicated that Professor Ramadan should be denied entry to the US on the grounds of donations he made between 1998 and 2002 to a Swiss charity that provides aid to Palastinians, which the U.S government claims was supporting terrorist groups. In a statement Ramadan’s attorney Jameel Jaffer claimed the verdict was “a very sad thing…both legally wrong and deeply unjust”. He said his client was excluded “not because of his actions, but because of his ideas”. Ramadan, Professor of Islamic Studies at St. Antony’s College, advocates the formation of a new European Islamic identity that embraces Western culture. Jaffer accused the court of having followed the government’s decision, “without any evidence at all”. Matt Gosho, Press Officer of the US-Embassy in London, said, “Professor Ramadan was excluded on the basis of donations he made to an organization supporting known terrorist groups in direct violation of our immigration statute.”The organisation was blacklisted by the U.S government in 2003 due to potential violations of the Patriot Act. Crotty ruled that laws enacted in 2005 should be applied retroactively to donations made before the organisation was blacklisted.Gosho continued, “The US Government does not bar, or seek to bar, foreign scholars from visiting, speaking, teaching or publishing in the United States, regardless of those scholars’ political views.
“In point of fact, there are thousands of such scholars are teaching, lecturing and speaking on campuses and in think tanks all over the United States. The U.S. Government, through the Department of State and the Department of Homeland Security, actively supports their presence in the America by facilitating their visas applications and entry into the United States. A scholar’s (or student’s, or businessperson’s, or tourist’s) political views are never a factor in determining that persons eligibility for entry into the U.S.” by Sophie Luebbert
 

ROWING Oxford University Boat Club began preparation for the Boat Race by holding the traditional ‘Trial Eight’ Race on the 13th of December. Named ‘shirts’ and ‘skins’ so as to remind spectators of the amateur nature of the event, both Eights were blighted by illness leading up to the race. After winning the toss the ‘skins’ took an early lead that that lasted until the Milepost straight. From here onwards, the race belonged to the ‘shirts’. By St. Pauls, they had stripped their opponents of the lead and eventually won by three lengths. The squad is currently training in Spain before they return on the 12th January to enter the final stage of their rigorous preparation. FOOTBALLOriel have been eliminated from the Cuppers competition for fielding an ineligible player in their 2nd round victory over Corpus/ Linacre. Goalkeeper Simon Noall, a student of Regents Park who was fielded by Oriel in the game, had already featured for New in the first round and was therefore judged ineligible. Despite lodging an appeal against the ruling, the decision was maintained by the committee who deemed it ‘a simple case of an ineligible player.’ Corpus/Linacre will continue to the next round.

By Jack FarchyAnimal rights activists have renewed their threats against Oxford and its new laboratory, promising to make the new laboratory “the new Huntingdon Life Sciences.” The threats were made by the Animal Liberation Front (ALF), a extremist organisation which has been implicated in previous attacks on the University and its staff. They were posted on the website ‘Bite Back’, which publicises the actions of ALF, and also claimed responsibility for two attacks on Oxfordshire companies alleged to be suppliers to the University. It read, “We will stop businesses dealing with the Uni, the only question is how much money they decide to lose themselves first!” “Oxford Uni – you can’t possibly win this. You may have nearly finished building work but how long do you think you can afford to keep the lab open? We will never stop so get used to being the new HLS [Huntingdon Life Sciences, the Cambridge project that was abandoned as a result of protests]. Let it begin.” The companies targeted have denied any links to the University. Thames Valley Police are currently investigating the incidents of vandalism. Robin Webb, a spokesperson for animal rights activists from the Animal Liberation Press Office, said, “Any group or organisation associated with the University is a legitimate target. It is up to these people to withdraw their support.” He praised the website for publishing the comments. He said, “Bite Back is an American website: in America, they genuinely have freedom of speech.” A spokesperson for Oxford University said that the University remains firmly committed to the completion of the animal research laboratory. “It has long been clear that certain individuals opposed to potentially life-saving research using animals are willing to use illegal intimidation, harassment and threats as part of their campaign. It is totally unacceptable that companies and individuals engaged in entirely lawful activities are being threatened in this way,” she said. Last month Mel Broughton, one of the co-founders of Speak, was charged with conspiracy to blackmail, possessing an explosive substance and having an article with intent to damage. He appeared before Oxford Crown Court on December 21 for a preliminary hearing, and is currently in custody awaiting his trial on March 7.

Apart from Joe Roff hanging up his boots to begin a career in commerce, the major talking point before Varsity Rugby was the new kick-off time. By moving the match to 4 o’clock on a Thursday, it was expected that hundreds of London businessmen would be able to come and watch after work. But there was a distinct lack of Suits in the diminished Twickenham crowd. The reason for this is simple. Businessmen measure things in terms of performance, product efficiency and profitability. It didn’t take Alan Sugar to point out to them that a ‘better’ deal could be found elsewhere. You don’t pay for amateurs. Fact. For £29 one can watch a professional performance by Wasps in the Guinness Premiership. Compare this ‘investment opportunity’ to watching a group of mature students playing rugby and the businessman can only make one choice: Joe Roff….“You’re fired”. Sorry, I meant retired.by Harry MacDowell

Friends of Benazir Bhutto, the opposition leader and former Prime Minister of Pakistan who was assassinated during the vacation, have remembered fondly her time at Oxford.Bhutto read PPE at Lady Margaret Hall between 1973-1977, and in 1977 she became the first Asian woman to be elected President of the Union.The election that she won was filled with controversy, and had to be rerun after Bhutto accused her rival of illegal canvassing. There were also allegations against Bhutto’s supporters and calls for an election tribunal to be held. However, it seems that no action was taken against Bhutto or her opponents.Cherwell reported in 1976 after winning the Presidency her rival candidate attacked her staircase, setting on fire a bin at the bottom of her staircase, and launching fireworks at her door.Buckets of sand were emptied out and light bulbs were smashed on her staircase.Her term as President was not without amusement. In an debate in 1977 Peter Oppenheimer, now a Fellow of Economics at Christ Church, said in a debate that Bhutto was “was the next best thing to [American actress and sex symbol] Raquel Welch in the chair.”Alan Duncan, who was Bhutto’s campaign manager in the Union elections and is now a Shadow Secretary of State, has described her as “fiery and fun.” In a comment piece for this week’s Cherwell he recalls, “For some absurd reason she decided to repaint the President’s office powder blue and some of us willingly helped her; only I don’t think we ever removed the books first. I took a call on the President’s red telephone while Benazir was up a ladder with a paintbrush, only to find myself speaking to her father. He was the first Prime Minister I’d ever spoken to. A few weeks later he was deposed by Zia ul Haq and, in an act of unspeakable act of viciousness, hanged a year later.”Michael Crick, another contemporary and Political Editor of Newsnight, told the national press that she had shown determination in her electoral bid to become Union President, and said that she had actually failed to win the election three times.He said, “She put all this effort into becoming president of the union, which was a bit pointless given she intended to scale much higher peaks.” Crick said that though Bhutto had bipartisan appeal, with friends in both Labour and Conservative camps in Oxford, she was not entirely popular. “Some people thought she was using her name and money to buy the presidency,” he said.Crick recalls that one particular speaker at the Union “brought the house down” by referring to Bhutto with the words, “Your father is, I believe, a butcher”. At this time, her father was facing accusation of murdering family members of a rival leader in Pakistan.Another long-time friend who she met at Oxford, the author Victoria Schofield, said, “She was very charismatic. […] We were a drab lot of 1970s students, messy and not very well-off… and there was this exotic woman who drove a sports car, when we mostly rode bicycles, and had lots of friends.“She enjoyed the Union but she liked socialising as well, she liked parties and wearing nice dresses.”
by Mohsin Khan

 ****Winner of the Palme d’Or, this is the latest acclaimed film from the burgeoning Romanian film industry. The second feature from director Christian Mungui, it tells the story of a student in 1987 communist Romania seeking an illegal abortion. The pregnant Gabita (Laura Vasiliu) is aided by her roommate Ollita (Anamaria Marinca). As they try to avoid the prying eyes of the state and a prison sentence they seek the help of Mr. Bebe who is to perform the operation.
The defining feature of this film is its sometimes shocking realism. The camera does not shy away from the details and this is vital to its ultimate success. By denying the preservation of his characters’ dignity, Mungui creates an effect of reality that immediately grips the viewer, aided by the conspicuous absence of music. He makes the most of a low budget with inventive use of the camera. The action switches between long stationary takes, often forcing the viewer to follow the characters from afar, to fast-moving handheld shots, many at night, which make the action difficult to follow but help to create a tense atmosphere. There is also good use of subtle tools such as background movement, light and shadow that keep one’s eyes glued to the screen, even through long periods of no dialogue.
The standout of this film, however, is the wonderful performance from Marinca as its resourceful heroine. There are very few moments when she is not on screen as the story is told from Ollita’s perspective, a wise choice by Mungui that results in riveting tension and fully utilises Marinca’s undoubted talent. Often she is alone and there is reliance only on her facial expression and body language to carry the shot, but she is a magnet for the camera. Vasiliu provides excellent support as the timid Gabita; indeed the performances are good all round.
Occasionally Mungui tries too hard to demonstrate the difficulties of living under the communist regime: a scene at the dinner table of a party which hurriedly covers most of the faults in Romanian sociey feels a little too blunt. But ultimately the film is a great achievment; captivating yet grounded in realism throughout. by Ben Williams 

With the first of four tries after only three minutes, two drop goals and a nail-bitingly close finish, the 126th Varsity Match was a highly entertaining game which, right until the final whistle, could have gone either way. In the end it was the resilience of the Light Blue forwards and staunch defending that gave Cambridge the edge, seeing them bash through to their 60th Varsity win. Just seconds after kick-off, Cambridge turned the ball over and a sharp offload from the tackle allowed them to gain momentum. When the Oxford winger Tom Tombleson was bundled into touch after gathering a kick, a 5m lineout put the Light Blues in a very strong attacking position with only 3 minutes on the clock. As had been predicted, the Cambridge pack kept it tight with a fierce drive for the line and Jon Dawson, former Harlequins and Wasps hooker, grounded the ball. A good strike from the Cambridge fly-half fell just short of the cross-bar. With a 5-point deficit after just 3 minutes, pre-match favourites Oxford would have to strike back fast to gain some momentum after conceding a soft try. When a great incisive run by their winger soon brought Cambridge up into Oxford’s half again, Oxford managed to settle themselves and turned the ball over. But a penalty against Oxford for offside allowed the Tabs to put 3 more points on the board. After the Dark Blues won a lineout, it was their captain, former Wallaby Joe Roff, who brought his team off the back foot in this, his last ever competitive game. Some silky running into the opposition’s 22m gave the Oxford forwards a chance to finally made their mark, grinding away to push closer to the line. The ball came out to McMahon in the pocket, who slotted a drop goal coolly between the posts to bring the Oxonians back into the game.The three points gave the Dark Blues the lift they needed, and after Cambridge’s Murray kicked the ball out on the full, Oxford demonstrated a solid attacking lineout. The ball was handled well through the backs and McMahon put Boto in space on a previously unexploited blindside. Cutting inside towards the line and stepping a missed interception by Cambridge’s Broadfoot, Boto offloaded to Chris Mahony who rolled with the tackle over the try line to sink the ball into the turf. McMahon’s conversion took Oxford into the lead 10-8 with ten minutes remaining in the first half. Unfortunately, Mahoney’s run also resulted in an ankle injury so Gregory came on at centre and Roff moved back to 15, a change that would have a significant impact on the game. Just minutes after Oxford’s first foray on the try line, Roff cut a line past Tombleson on the inside with space enough to see Dark Blue spectators jump to their feet in anticipation. However, fumbling the ball in what was surely a try-scoring opportunity, the half-time whistle blew with the score still at 10-8 to Oxford. After the break, Cowie and Davis replaced Rosen and Allusen in the front row. More kicking began the second half, with the ball flying back and forth as it had in the early stages of the match. Once again taking control, Roff tried an up-andunder which resulted in a penalty for Oxford. McMahon stepped up to the occasion to seal the three points, taking the score to 13-8. When an injury to Cambridge’s flyhalf forced a reorganisation in the Light Blue backs, Oxford seemed to have the run of play, with solid work from the pack keeping the momentum moving forward. Re-playing a tactic that had worked in the first half, McMahon dropped a second goal (the third player to do so in the history of the Varsity match) and propelled his team to an 8-point lead. Matthews then replaced Lutton to complete a new front row for the Dark Blues. Penalised for being off their feet, with 20 minutes left Oxford found themselves once more defending a 5m lineout. Like an action replay of the beginning of the match, the Cambridge forwards proved their strength, remaining on their feet to charge over the line. A successful conversion meant that the rivals were one point apart, and a bout of tussling after the whistle made the tension palpable. Reinvigorated by the score, Cambridge continued to use the strength of the rolling maul and made fast yards. After an impressive passage of play the ball was passed through the backs until a change of direction when the number 8 charged through Oxford’s defence to ground the ball once more. Duly converted, Oxford would need to respond quickly, with Cambridge in the lead 23-15 and the clock running down. Having had difficulty making a mark on the game since his move to full-back, Roff found himself knocked to the ground after a kick in an overzealous late tackle by his opposite number. Referee Tony Spreadbury awarded Oxford a penalty from where the ball landed, and it was the Dark Blues’ turn to attack the 5m lineout. However, there was miscommunication and messy ball, and unlike the Light Blue forwards, Oxford did not stay on their feet. The last five minutes of the match were played in the Cambridge half, tantalisingly close to the line, but Cambridge’s defence sessions with Wasps coach Saun Edwards seemed to have paid off. In their very last campaign for victory, with 50 seconds on the clock and the ball a metre from the line, the Oxford forwards bashed through player after player with dogged determination, fighting for inches. When the ball came out into the backs, players were lining up in space to score, but with no margin for error this was not Oxford’s day. The pass did not link up; the stadium erupted into a multitude of Light Blue cheers. Despite a significantly more successful season than their rivals, a captain with a World Cup win under his belt, and an 8-point lead after 50 minutes, for the third successive year Varsity victory has eluded the Oxford Blues. After the match the Oxford players were ready to commend Cambridge’s defensive effort in the final minutes of the game, which was by all accounts, outstanding. That the match was so close will surely be no consolation for the players, but for those watching it was testament to the prestige and competitive spirit of this unique fixture.by Stephanie Hardwick

Cuts in government funding could mean some Oxford students will face tuition fees of up to £7,000.Oxford University is expected to lose £4.1 million if plans go ahead to reduce state support for second degrees and lower level, shorter courses by £100 million. Oxford, and other institutions such as UCL and the Open University, say this will leave them with no alternative but to increase fees.The government proposal has been criticised in Westminster. More than 200 MPs, including 86 from Labour, have signed a motion against the reallocation of government funding. The intention is to provide an extra 20, 000 places for undergraduates.Bill Rammell, Minister for Lifelong Learning, Further and Higher Education explained, “We are redirecting £100 million over three years from funding students studying for second degrees to support even more getting a first degree. And with 70% of the adult workforce without a first degree, this has to be the right priority.”Lesley Simms, Head of Planning and Resource Allocation for Oxford University, said, “We calculate that we have the equivalent of about 975 full-time equivalent students who are studying equivalent or lower level qualifications and are not exempt from this proposal.”Philip Healy, the Director of Public Programmes for Oxford University’s Department for Continuing Education, commented, “It is really very damaging… It will inevitably mean that students who already have a qualification that is equivalent or higher than the new one will have to pay higher fees.”However Healy accepted that “[Tuition fees] are a market –driven thing so there is a limit to how much the market can bear so we will obviously have to make other adjustments. It may mean savings also.”He added, “There is an inconsistency. On the one hand the government is urging people to undertake lifelong learning but this policy is going to have an adverse effect on certain groups who do this. People who already have a degree, who are well educated, but want to change direction or need to improve their skills will not necessarily be doing these courses at a higher level. So they are now being told that their employer should pay or they themselves will have to pay… The future is pretty grim if it goes forward.”Any increase in fees will depend on the outcome of a Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) proposal to the Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills Select Committee. Under the HEFCE proposal, some university courses would be exempt from the change in policy. These would include medicine and teaching training as well as ‘vulnerable’ or ‘minority’ subjects that are nationally under-subscribed.Oxford University will also submit written evidence to the Select Committee inquiry. The Department for Continuing Education and the Theology Faculty are likely to suffer most from the changes.Oxford’s Physics Department is also looking particularly vulnerable, as it could lose 25% of its grant for particle physics and astronomy. This is a result of planned £80 million government cuts to the Science and Technology Facilities Council budget, which distributes state funding for scientific research.Professor Philip Burrows said, “If you find particle physics or astronomy exciting and motivating subjects, you might think twice about doing a physics degree if you hear that the UK is cutting back on its funding in those areas.“Since the Government has recognised the importance of a healthy supply of physicists to underpin the UK science base and the economy, the proposed STFC cuts in physics seem baffling.”
by Rob Pomfret