Oxford’s rugby Blues had a tough start to their season with a tour to South Africa. Coming away with a win and two losses, the Blues showed considerable potential but will also have learnt some harsh lessons ahead of December’s Varsity match. A squad of twenty six flew off to Cape Town eager to make up for an early setback against Henley Hawks, losing 30-19. The Blues kicked off with a fixture against a Villagers development team, coming out with a 62-5 win. The next fixture was against Stellenbosch University, a much tougher propostion. Up against a heavier pack and under considerable pressure out wide, a brilliant individual try from Anthony Knox was able to carve out a form sent the Blues into the break 12-3 up. The Blues were once again under pressure after the break, their line finally breached by a kick behind from Stellenbosch. When a Stellenbosch penalty gave them the lead and Blues scrum half Kevin Brennan went off with a broken arm, the match looked lost and disappointingly the final score was 21-19. Beset by injuries, Oxford went into their final game against University of Cape Town unable to field a full match squad. Their backs were once more creative, scoring three tries; however, the powerful UCT side ran out 26-17 winners.Without doubt, the Blues’ early results have been a little disappointing. However, it should not be forgotten that as university sides go, their South African opponents were as strong as they come; when Cambridge toured South Africa last year, they went home winless, including a 60 point drubbing. The Blues have showed very considerable potential, with skillful and genuinely dangerous backs. Commenting on their tough tour Steve Hill, the Blues’ Director of Rugby, said that “sets us up very well” for taking on the Tabs at Twickenham.ARCHIVE: 0th week MT 2005

Oxford’s oarsmen completed one of their most successful season ever with three gold medals at World Championships in Gifu, Japan. Great Britain’s Andy Hodge and Pete Reed crushed their opposition in the coxless fours final, while their 2005 Blue Boat teammate Mike Blomquist helped power the United States Eight to a thrilling victory. Hodge and Reed’s four won with a dominance no British boat has achieved since the Pinsent and Redgrave era. Arriving in Japan on the back of a twelve race unbeaten streak, they won both their heat and semi final with ease. In the final, the Great Britain crew were even more convincing, leading from start to finish despite tricky conditions and quality opposition. After building up a half length lead to the halfway mark, a devastating third 500m put Great Britain almost a length up and the race beyond doubt. The Dutch showed their class with a determined charge through the last 500, but never looked under pressure and crossed the line two thirds of a length in front. Hodge and Reed have been the star performers of British rowing all year. Reed, in his first year as an international, delighted national coaches by winning the Great Britain pairs trials with Hodge and seamlessly slotting into the top boat alongside more experienced oarsmen. Hodge, meanwhile, has achieved what many thought impossible by filling the giant shoes of four times Olympic champion Matthew Pinsent. After stroking the national top boat to a victory Pinsent would have been proud of and even knocking off one of Pinsent’s British records on the rowing machines, Hodge has truly taken Pinsent’s mantle as the world’s top oarsman. Blomquist enjoyed a harder fought but no less impressive win. As defending Olympic Champions, the US were the crew to beat. However, they had suffered from retirements since the Athens Games, and while they rebuilt their crew the Germans and Italians dominated the international regatta season. Nonetheless, the Americans provided a statement of intent by winning their semi final, and, though chased hard all the way in the final, never relinquished their initial lead to win Gold.Elsewhere, Blue Boat cox Acer Nethercott steered Great Britain to an unexpected fourth place, OUBC President Barney Williams’ Canadian Eight won the B-final and 2004 Blue Colin Smith finished twelfth in the single scull. Coming at the end of a season which saw Oxford’s oarsmen defeat Cambridge’s self-declared “best ever crew” by clear water, smash Leander, Britain’s top club, by nine lengths in a private race, and claim the five of the top six spots at the BUSA indoor rowing championships, the golden haul brings to a close a season of prodigious success. The arrival in Oxford of world class performers such as Olympic champion Setfan Moelvig and former world ergo record holder Jamie Schroder suggests the Blues could continue this success for another season.
ARCHIVE: 0th week MT 2005

If you are taking even a cursory interest in British politics over the next few weeks, there are a few phrases which you should be familiar with. ‘We must claim the centre ground’; ‘Modernisation’; ‘Opportunity for the many and not the few’; ‘Radical reform’; ‘Equality’; ‘Change’; ‘Renewal’; ‘Compassion’; to name but a few. I quote directly from Tony Blair’s speech to the Labour Party Conference at the end of September, in which he attempted to illustrate his core beliefs and plans for the next few years. However, the reason for giving these phrases was not to talk about Tony Blair; it was to talk about the impending Tory leadership contest. It may interest you to know that every single one of these very phrases, or very close derivations of these, was used in David Davis’ recent speech on his vision of ‘Modern Conservatism in the 21st century’. Most of them could be found in David Cameron’s speech at his campaign launch only last week. They all can be found many times over in Ken Clarke’s statements, interviews, and speeches in recent months. These men are, at the point of writing, the three main contenders for the Conservative Party leadership.What has become plainly obvious is that they are trying to attract support by using the same language and sentiments as the dominant and centrist Tony Blair. I am not trying to suggest that past leadership candidates, of any party, have not claimed to want to move the party into the centre ground of politics – most do – but the centre ground of politics was there long before Blair. What I mean is that there has been a quite deliberate shift to using ‘Blairite’ rhetoric in an attempt by the candidates to show that they are true centrist politicians, ie not prisoners of the Tories’ strong right wing. This illustrates the level to which New Labour has changed political discourse in Britain. Blair, for all his foibles, has skilfully managed to articulate the hopes, opinions, and aspirations of the majority of people in this country. That is why a majority of the middle class who used to call themselves Conservatives has voted for him over the past 8 years. Previously, Tory leadership candidates earned their spurs by saying how much they hated New Labour and its ideas. Now, they have finally realised what it will take to win: accept that there is a new political landscape, set by New Labour, and shape their message accordingly.Tory leaders understand that they need to do what Labour did in the early 1990’s after Thatcher: a painful modernising process, ignoring the extreme section in the party, adapting the Party’s policies and beliefs to the current political climate – the temperature of which had been changed by Blair while as PM. Therefore, we are beginning to see the seeds of recovery for the party that used to be called ‘the natural party of government’.Now the difficult part: who should the party choose for leader and trust to carry through the difficult renewal of the party? David Davis is the front runner, and undoubtedly a man of the right from the IDS and William Hague camp, despite now trying to convince us that he has been a centrist all along. He definitely has advantages: in particular, his working class background of having grown up on a council estate gives him credentials that Ken Clarke and David Cameron do not have. His right wing background doesn’t mean that he isn’t sincere about trying to change the party’s message, but it does mean that his reform will be slow, cautious, and could possibly run into trouble if his main backers, the party’s right wing, decide that he is no longer ‘one of them’. David Cameron is the newcomer. At only 38 years old, and having sat in the Commons for only 4 years, he is appealing, photogenic and certainly very able. He is certainly a true moderniser, and would also be more genuinely committed and able to change the party’s appeal than Davis, and I believe he has the potential to be a great Prime Minister in the future. However, he is very short on political experience, and it must be remembered that since the party started electing their leader in 1965, they have always chosen a candidate from a lower middle class or working class background: Heath, Thatcher, Major, Hague, IDS, Howard. The party’s sensitivity to choosing a ‘toff ’ as leader may make things even more difficult for him, the urbane Old Etonian. Now that Portillo has dropped out of a political career, Ken Clarke is the last remaining ‘big beast’ of the party. An earthy and charismatic heavyweight, fond of his pints and cigars, he has long been a proponent of centrist ‘One Nation’ Conservatism, and is the only candidate who has long said that the party should learn lessons from New Labour’s success. He is the figure most popular with the public, especially with the middle class swing voters who deserted the party for Tony Blair; one might think that the party would be mad not to choose such a man. His main problem among party members, who, despite Michael Howard’s best efforts, have the final say after MPs have whittled the choice down to two candidates, remains his enthusiasm for Europe: he would be leading a wildly Eurosceptic party, and the shadow of the disastrous in-fighting of the Major years looms over this scenario.Whether the party can get over this single aspect of Kenneth Clarke’s politics and pick the one man who might actually stand a chance of beating Labour at the next election, only time will tell us.
ARCHIVE: 0th week MT 2005

Fifty years after Satyajit Ray’s monumental debut ‘Pather Panchali’ stunned critics and enthralled audiences at home and abroad, Somak Ghoshal examines the legacy of a man who first showed the world the face of modern India.
The quiet but deep observation, understanding and love of the human race, which are characteristic of all his films, have impressed me greatly. I feel that he is a ‘giant’ of the movie industry.” That is how Kurosawa, never a man fond of unnecessary flattery, described Satyajit Ray, a man who emerged from post-colonial Bengal to impress and inspire audiences and critics across the globe. Though all his films are in Bengali or Hindi, their subtly observed study of multitudinous shades of the human condition ranks them as universal in their appeal and acclaim. But Satyajit Ray also left a cinematic heritage that belongs as much to India, the country whose post-war legacy his work did much to reflect, evoke and define.
The reason for much of this can be seen in the socio-cultural milieu from which the director emerged. His grandfather was a distinguished writer, painter, and composer, while his father was an eminent poet and illustrator of nonsense literature in the tradition of Lewis Carroll and Edward Lear. The family he grew up in, urban and middle-class, had embraced the Brahmo religion at a comparatively early stage, and the liberal, progressive outlook of Brahmo Samaj strongly influenced Ray’s mindset and work. Many of his films would reflect the reformist agendas of the Brahmo Samaj and a strong aversion to religious fanaticism, Ghare Baire (The Home and the World), and Ganashatru (The Enemy of the People), to name a few. The liberal-humanist leanings of his family must have had a strong effect on Ray, who grew up within a well-wrought tradition of humanist education, interested in art, literature, music, and most importantly, film, both oriental and occidental.
Pather Panchali (The Song of the Little Road), Ray’s first film, is a testament to his importance, both as a director and an Indian cultural commentator. Beset by the bleakest financial difficulties and utilising a cast with little or no stage experience, it transformed the face of post-colonial Indian cinema, winning dozens of awards at global film festivals. Ray was criticised by his detractors for depicting the face of a povertystricken, newly independent nation; but he went on to make two sequels to this film, both superior human documents in themselves, to complete what is now known as the ‘Apu Trilogy’ after the eponymous hero, whose personal development forms the thread between the narratives. The films chart the maturation of Apu, the son of a priest and member of a poor family living in a rural India, into a man aware of the wider urban and technological world. Ironically, the transition for Ray was very much in the opposite direction. As he said, “While making Pather Panchali, I discovered rural life. I’d been city-born, city-bred, so I didn’t know the Bengali village firsthand. Talking to people, reacting to moods, to the landscape, to the sights and sounds – all this helped. But it’s not just people who have been brought up in villages who can make films about village life. An outside view is also able to penetrate.”
Shortly after the Pather Panchali Ray made Parash Pathar (The Philosopher’s Stone) which he described to Marie Seton as “a sort of combination of comedy, fantasy, satire, farce and a touch of pathos”. It is the last of these epithets, pathos, that would come to haunt most of Ray’s later and best-known works.
Ray was making his films through the 60s, 70s and 80s when European cinema was at the height of its modernist phase. But while his admiring European contemporaries – Fellini, Hitchcock, Bergman, Pasolini – were shaping the rules of post-modern aesthetics, Ray worked in no fixed genre. He made a song and dance children’s fantasy film, Goopy Gyne Bagha Byne (1969), a detective crime fiction, Sonar Kella (The Fortress 1974), and historicals such as Shatranj ke Khiladi (The Chess Players 1977), also his first film in Hindi.
The ability to work in such a wide array of genres was evidence of Ray’s myriad-mindedness and rejection of fixed principles of filmmaking. His work was distinguished from the regular features of avant-garde cinema, in that it disliked the idea of a film that drew attention to its style rather than the content. This is why his work touches one as a subtle revelation of artistry in which he uncovered his attitude and sympathies in a manner that was, and will always be, accessible to the masses. It is worth mentioning that Ray is perhaps one of the very few filmmakers whose works appeal to the widest range of audiences, from the subalterns to the elites, in modern Bengal. Most of his films were commercial successes unlike the usual neglect that ‘intellectual’ cinema meets with at the box office. His films are devoid of sentimental messages or didacticism; instead there is always an attempt at re-evaluating the commonplace and quotidian by transforming the utterly mundane into the excitement of an adventure. Ray had the power and expertise to recognise and express the mythic in the ordinary.
In what has now become a legendary sequence in Pather Panchali, Apu, the child hero, is taken by his elder sister Durga to see a train for the first time. While they wait for the strange and sublime novelty railgari (Bengali for the train) they are mesmerised by the humming of the telegraph poles, and the wind sweeping over the fields, heralding the approach of the wonder. This wait, made poignant by the lingering presence of a childish wonder of the unknown, makes even a modern Indian or Western audience living in a technologically advanced society pause breathlessly.
Ray captures his audience by provoking feeling and response through his sensitivity as an artisan of film. Outlining and exploring the universal human constants such as death, love, separation and responding to changes within and without, Ray bridges the gulf of time and distance between his subject and his audiences through the intense detailing of personal moments of excited happiness and joy. Moreover, he has the extraordinary capacity of evoking the unsaid through gestures, powerful background music and long close-shots.
This ability to create a sense of intimate connection between people of vastly different cultures is Ray’s greatest achievement. Like most of his great contemporaries in world cinema he can create an awareness of the ordinary man, which isn’t achieved in the abstract but by using the simplest, most common and concrete details such as a gesture or a glance. There is a contemplative quality in the magnificent flow of images and sounds, an attitude of acceptance and detachment, which is the hallmark of his inner as well as outer vision. His compassionate work arises from the noblest of philosophical traditions, the true spirit of which is distinctly Indian and invokes a detached intrepidity, celebrates joy in birth and life and accepts death with grace. Ray succeeded in making Indian cinema something to be taken seriously, and in so doing, created a body of work of distinct range and richness.
The cinema of Satyajit Ray is that rarest blend of intellect and emotion. Though his approach is controlled and precise, his real skill is at evoking deep and sublime responses from his audience. His films display a finetuned sensitivity without descending into melodrama or excess; they invoke the universal and immutable language of all the great filmmakers. Three weeks before his death in April 1992 he recieved an Honorary Oscar “in recognition of his rare mastery of the art of motion pictures… which has had an indelible influence on filmmakers and audiences throughout the world”, and the Bharat Ratna (Jewel of India), India’s highest civilian honour – fitting for a director whose meditations on the nature of the human condition displayed to the world the creative fertility of a newly formed nation forging its path.
ARCHIVE: 0th week TT 2005

Binyamin Even talks to OUBC President Robin Bourne-Taylor in about life as a Blues rower in Oxford Robin Bourne-Taylor represents you. As President of Oxford University Boat Club (OUBC), far more people see him as an image of an Oxford student than any current member of the student body. Literally millions watched him lead Oxford to victory in the Boat Race; millions more saw him in national newspapers, on the radio, on billboards or in ITV adverts, and he therefore inadvertently symbolises the life of an Oxford student.
This appears fairly bizarre. Bourne-Taylor is a quadruple Blue and an Olympian. There is not an area of his life that isn’t affected by the sport and yet the majority of students have little to do with rowing. I decided to travel back to Oxford during the Easter vac to find out: does Robin Bourne- Taylor have anything in common with the students he so publicly represents?
[quoteimg]“We don’t train that much; maximum actual training is four hours a day. But if we have to travel there’s plenty of days of nine hours.”[/quoteimg] I start by asking Bourne-Taylor just how much of his life rowing really takes up. “Training starts on 1 September, but a lot of the guys will be training permanently. I came straight back from the Olympics, and a lot of people were rowing internationally in the summer. It’s a long commitment to the Boat Race, but it means we hit the ground running.” In terms of dayto- day workload, “We don’t train that much: maximum is four hours actual training a day, but we can waste a lot of time if we have to travel to London or something like that. There’s plenty of days where we spend seven, eight, nine hours.” So far, then, no luck – discovering ITV’s claim that rowers train six months for the Boat Race was actually an underestimate only made Bourne-Taylor seem even more irreconcilable with the “normal” students I’ve met.
As we move to the topic of motivation, however, he becomes more human. For Bourne-Taylor is the ultimate team player, playing for the jersey: “Obviously the Boat Race is an amazing event, with so much history – there’s nothing else like it in the rowing world. But for someone like me, who’s been here a long time, it becomes more than that. You want to do it for your club, and for the passion you have for your club.” It’s not as catchy as “Up the Nose!” or “For the Pelican!” but the message is the same. He speaks with passion about his team mates, saying, “This year at Oxford there was a really great bunch of guys. The personalities were fantastic, and that’s one of the most important things I’d take out of it.” And he leaves no doubt about the importance of those closest to him. “A big part of my success, and of the success of guys on the team, is that support from your friends. It’s those little things that help out – if it’s people getting lecture notes, or helping you catch up if you missed something, or girlfriends cooking you dinner.”
Picking up on Bourne-Taylor’s mention of lecture notes, I find it is no token academic reference. “People come to Oxford because it’s one of the finest academic institutions in the world. You can’t get in because of rowing – there’s no one here who’s in this university because of their talent at rowing. They’re here because they’re of a sufficiently high academic standard. If they set their ambitions on something like the Boat Race, I think that’s great. It’s good for the University, and it’s good for them.” He applauds his team mates for completing Blue Boat training on top of their academic workload, “It’s a real credit to the guys who do it, because it’s so much of a commitment of effort and time.” He mentions Jason Flickinger, 7 man in the Blue Boat. “He’s doing the MBA programme, one of the most intensive courses in Oxford, and he’s going on barely any sleep.” Despite this, the giant American “won the [BUSA] ergo champs, on about three hours sleep”.
So, Blues rowers do study. But doesn’t the combination of an Oxford academic workload and a Blue Boat training regime leave him socially detached from anyone outside the tiny rowing bubble? Bourne-Taylor recognises this as a downside. “It’s difficult, because you do get isolated from college life. You don’t know as many people, because you don’t have the time.” Nevertheless, “Even though we have to spend so much time training, we still feel part of the student body of the university.”
Rowing also presents its own social opportunities: “What you do gain is a really tight group of about twenty friends who are likeminded, all on the same goals, and you go through the same things together. You build some really strong friendships.”
When he can, Bourne-Taylor gets involved in college and university life. He’s a member of his College’s drinking society, The Cardinals, and as a student who will join Sandhurst after graduation, he has a long commitment to the Oxford University Officer Training Corps: “I go down there whenever I can,” he says. He speaks particularly warmly of the OTC Colonel who helped set up a team building day for the Blues at the local barracks.
Bourne-Taylor has also rowed for his College in Summer Eights on a number of occasions. He dismissed any doubts that such a successful oarsman would not commit himself to the less glamorous world of college rowing when he stroked Christ Church to First Division Blades in his first year. In fact, he has warm praise for college rowing. “College rowing is really good in Oxford. It’s a haven for really keen rowers, and there are not many places you get that enthusiasm so focused on one thing. College rowing’s brilliant for the sport, and events like Summer Eights and Torpids are really good spectacles and a good thing for people to get involved in.” This year, Summer Eights clashes with a Rowing World Cup event, but he’s sure “any members of the team who can will do it, because it’s a great way to take part in your college and show support for them”. He particularly encourages talented college rowers to think about joining the Blue Squad. “College rowers out there with aspirations should really put themselves forward and not be afraid to have a go. If you get in early, you may not be very experienced, but if you do a year’s worth of training you’ll improve phenomenally, and next year you might make the spot in Isis and if you keep going you might get a spot in the Blue Boat. It’s about how much you’re willing to give and how much you’re willing to learn.”
As my meeting with Bourne-Taylor drew to a close, it remained clear that he was a very unusual student. The sacrifices he makes for rowing, particularly with respect to his social life, demonstrate he prioritises his sport in a way very few others do. But I felt much more comfortable with the fact that, for millions of people, he portrayed a group of which I was part. Fundamentally, Bourne-Taylor is no different to many Oxford students who devote time and energy to an activity outside of their degree. In this respect he represents Oxford students who strive for excellence in all that they do and perhaps he is not as far removed from the reality of student life as some would believe.
ARCHIVE: 0th week TT 2005

Tuesday 5 April 2005. A special moment in the history of European football as Liverpool fans atone for the horrors of the past with a heartfelt and emotional display of sorrow and friendship.
Tuesday 12 April 2005. Football’s new-found piety is shattered with some of the most shocking scenes of football violence in recent memory. Two events – exactly a week apart – reveal both the heavenly heights and the darkest depths that football can reach.
Leaving Anfield, following Liverpool’s Champions’ League quarter- final against Juventus, you had the sense that football had finally turned its back on its ugly history. The raw, bleeding honesty of the massed ranks of red and the desperate desire never to return to the nightmare of 1985 could be seen on the face of all. For a sport that too often is guilty of providing a voice for the most vile aspects of human nature these were special moments. As you filed out of the stadium that night the sense of ecstasy and optimism was almost overwhelming.
The potential of this great sport, you realised, to reach across barriers and to create ties of friendship, even from the darkest caverns of hatred, was unparalleled.
How naive. Barely a week on and a different quarter-final ends in chaos: a footballer is in hospital with first degree burns, and the pitch is ablaze with the orange flames of innumerable flares. Images more reminiscent of a war zone than a sporting event. Yet again the thugs were allowed to triumph and football’s dream was cut cruelly short. It seems every time football attempts to haul itself away from its terrible memories there are always a few ready to send the sport spinning back into the dark ages.
The only antidote to football’s disease is swift, strong action from the authorities and in this case UEFA have failed in their duty. A meagre fine and a four game ground closure will have no effect upon the actions of the Ultras, the real authorities of Italian football. UEFA have been quick to stress the fact the £133,000 fine which landed on Inter’s desk on Friday is the largest they have ever handed out but it is a paltry sum compared to the vast amounts of money the famous club makes on a single match day. Ground closure is a similarly ineffective punishment. The San Siro has been closed before – after Inter fans threw a rival fan’s scooter from the stand – but this has in no way deterred supporters from further violence. The Olympic Stadium was closed in December after referee Anders Frisk was badly injured by a coin thrown from the crowd, yet Italian football continues to struggle in a sea of violence, racism and anti-Semitism.
UEFA have clearly not learnt from the lessons of the past. Football hooliganism in England is now effectively controlled by the authorities, but this was only the result of tough action in the wake of the Heysel disaster.
UEFA had no choice but to act in the face of such evil events, but the ignorance of the authorities to English thuggery throughout the 80s was a contributory factor to the horrors of that European Cup Final. Earlier and tougher action against the hooligans could well have averted the deaths of 36 football fans and, while it is all too easy to moralise in hindsight, here UEFA have the opportunity to learn from the errors of the past.
No-one is saying that Italian clubs should face the same punishment that English clubs met in 1985 – hooliganism in Italy has not yet plumbed the depths witnessed in Heysel – but a slap on the wrist is no longer an acceptable response to football violence on the continent. Far be it for an English football fan to moralise over others – the efforts of recent years does not excuse or eradicate the memories of the past – but UEFA, along with the Italian authorities, need to wake up and take serious action against the parasites destroying the game. Football is the most passionate sport in the world and when channelled effectively, as at Anfield three weeks ago, can produce some of the most spectacular, and moving, sights in sport. Indeed, the fervour of the Italian fans is one the most impressive aspects of Serie A. It is the duty of the authorities, not to spend wasted hours conjuring up ridiculous new legislation, but to ensure this passion does not go too far.
Whether this be through points deductions, enforced bans or closer co-operation with police, it will certainly be more effective than the token gesture that was their latest attempt.

Pembroke 3Christ Church 1
Many might have considered the final of the men’s hockey cuppers competition as a foregone conclusion. Pembroke fielded four current or ex-Blues including this year’s Blues captain Thomas Bullock, Blues Vice Captain Robert Frampton and internationally capped Ed Bevan. Against this array of talent, Christ Church could only muster one Blue and one returning Blue. Pembroke were clearly full of confidence, reflected no less by the swarms of Pembroke supporters on the sidelines. Christ Church in contrast appeared quiet and composed as they focused on the challenge before them.
Christ Church were practically unchanged from the semi-final line up that had inched past Magdalen in sudden death penalty flicks and they came out playing controlled, skilful hockey. With unexpected composure they effectively denied Pembroke any sniff of the ball during the first 15 minutes while managing to press forward in numbers through Phillip Pond and Daniel Soloman. Pembroke’s back four, marshalled by two senior Blues (Brixley and Bevan), made numerous last second tackles to block Christ Church’s more promising chances.
The pressure led to a number of short corners which became nothing more than missed opportunities for Christ Church as the half progressed. After the initial pressure, Pembroke began to play themselves back into the game as their passing improved and just before halftime they won a short corner, which they were distinctly more effective in taking. A high and hard drag flick was saved by the Christ Church keeper, but a second corner led to a second flick which was driven low past the goalkeeper into the backboard. A second goal from Bullock left Christ Church trailing by two after a half in which they impressed, having dominated for the majority of it.
Pembroke came out quickly after the break, pressing the opposition into their own 25 and holding them there for the first few minutes before Christ Church could get possession. When they did regain the ball they retained it with all the composure they had shown in the first half, edged with a more urgent, attacking outlook on play. Philip Pond drew Christ Church within a single goal of Pembroke, but a third goal from Frampton sealed the game for the Pinks. A third dragflick, hard and high ,was fired past the Christ Church keeper and the game ended 3-1, a fair reflection of a game in which Christ Church failed to convert short corners into chances.
After the match the Oxford University Hockey Cuppers Trophy was awarded by Dr Jonathan Hunt (former Blue and Old Pembrokian) to the winning team, and the beer bottles were swept up until next year’s Varsity and Cupper’s hockey matches. • Worcester stormed to the College First Division title with 12 wins from their 13 league matchesARCHIVE: 0th week TT 2005

Cambridge 0Oxford 20
Oxford’s Women came into the Varsity Match with high hopes due to the fine form which had seen them win their two previous matches without conceding a single point. Their confidence was rewarded as they started the match the stronger, soon scoring through Laura Richards after a well-executed backs move. The try, however, came as an incentive to Cambridge, who found some attacking form, and the half came to a close with Oxford having to display their well-organised defensive skills to prevent Cambridge converting their possession into points.
The second half however saw Oxford dominate proceedings far more thoroughly. Oxford created a string of fast phases, stretching the Cambridge defence and allowing Sarah Taylor to outpace the Cambridge full back on the line. This was followed by a Stacey Beard try as Oxford continued to exploit the width of the pitch. Cambridge’s misery ensued as their forwards found themselves completely outdone in the scrum. This led to panic among the backs and a misplaced kick was intercepted by the captain, Rebecca Young, who scored the final try of the match. It was perhaps surprising that the score was not even higher in Oxford’s favour as Cambridge looked completely outclassed. The final whistle meant the end of 240 minutes of rugby in which the Dark Blues had not conceded a single point.
Oxford’s two previous victories against Durham and Marjohns meant they also had a place in the semi-final of the BUSA Championship in Coventry to compete for a place in the final at Twickenham. The Blues sadly went down to a strong UWIC side, the final score of 32-7 perhaps belying the competitveness of this match ARCHIVE: 0th week TT 2005

Oxford triumph in dull Varsity clash after keeper Nick Baker keeps out a penalty before Luther Sullivan secures the spoils for the visitorsCambridge 0Oxford 1
In 1988, the 53 year old tradition of staging Varsity football at Wembley came to an end. As the annual contest between Dark and Light Blue continued to descend in a spiral of declining prestige it was felt the falling attendances were not large enough to justify a day trip to the home of English football. Just 7,000 people turned up that year to witness Cambridge take victory; a sorry figure when compared to the heady days of the 1950s when 100,000 fans would pack the Wembley terraces to see the two teams clash beneath those famous towers.
What then can be said of the 826 unhappy souls whose strained voices rippled round Cambridge United’s empty Abbey Stadium one cold night last Hilary Term? A pitiful figure for a fixture that has as much history as the FA Cup Final. A number that looks even more pathetic when compared to the 50,000 Varsity supporters who still make the yearly pilgrimage to Twickenham every December. Perhaps the Oxford student looks to find greater gratification at the end-of-term bop or in the classic ‘entertainment’ offered by a night of Comic Relief, rather than ninety minutes in the cold and a decidedly dodgy hotdog.
The Oxford players, at least, were willing to treat the contest with all the commitment and energy that history demands. Their victory, over a Cambridge side classed as favourites beforehand, was rarely pretty, but Oxford’s grit and determination meant it was never anything less than deserved. Those who feared the poor turnout may impact on the players could not have been more wrong.
For sixty minutes, however, those who decided to stay in Oxford would have been thankful as the erratic performances of both sides betrayed their nerves on the big stage. Oxford started tensely, too often looking for the killer pass and relinquishing possession too easily. Had it not been for the heroics of keeper Nick Baker, they would have found themselves out of the contest before the half hour mark.
His first contribution was a penalty stop from Cambridge’s Alex Mugan. From a short corner Mugan was felled clumsily in the area. He picked himself up only to see Baker at full-stretch to prevent a certain Cambridge goal and deny him a place in the history books. He continued to prove his worth to the Blues with another superb save moments later. With the ball crashing around the six-yard box Baker leapt at the feet of Chris Turnbull and halted the Light Blue defender in his tracks before it was finally scrambled clear.
Baker’s heroics did not exactly light the Dark Blue touch paper, but they did seem to rouse Oxford from their first half slumber and for the rest of the game they looked the more assured side. They kept the ball better in midfield and the two wingers started to get more joy down the flanks. The Cambridge right back, in particular, looked positively terrified of the trickery and pace of Ricky Tavares.
It was his counterpart on the right flank, however, who would have the most impact on the second half. Without the antics of Baker, Luther Sullivan would surely have taken the Man of the Match award and it was his goal on the hour mark that sent Oxford into raptures. A long ball from Jack Hazzard was brilliantly controlled by the winger and, with raw and frightening pace, he forced his way into the area before coming back onto his left foot and delicately curling the ball into the top corner.
It was a brilliantly simple goal that had been on the cards for a while. Indeed, the unusually subdued Jamie Forrest should have given Oxford the lead ten minutes earlier, but, in an almost identical position, his shot dribbled wide.
Oxford had further chances to settle the game through Nat Armstrong and, most notably, James Perkins, whose shot from the edge of the box was well saved by Duncan Heath in the Cambridge goal. As it was, though, Sullivan’s solitary goal was enough as Oxford, despite late anxiety, hung on for victory. It was far from a spectacular triumph but it is not as if the Dark Blues will care. Their name goes into the annals of history and, after all, no-one was there to see it.ARCHIVE: 0th week TT 2005

New 1Balliol 3
The age-old dilemma of many a top flight club – to enjoy a cup run or focus solely on staving off relegation – was epitomised in Balliol’s season of mixed fortunes. In the end they will probably settle for the glory of a Cuppers final victory over a New side who will replace them in the Premier Division next year. “On that pitch everyone gave 110%,” said Andy James, the victorious skipper. “I want to thank everyone for an excellent team performance and the fans who made it an awesome day.” James also singled out double goalscorer Ed Thompson for special praise for a “great performance in what was quite a frustrating position”. It was indeed Thompson’s day. Battling alone up front, he held the ball up well in search of support and then stole the glory with two second-half strikes that sealed Balliol’s first Cuppers trophy for 74 years, on a most blustery of days. With the wind funnelling directly down the length of the pitch and with a bouncy ball on a hard surface, this match always threatened a twist until Thompson’s late second, latching onto James Doree’s speculative ball over the top, put the result beyond doubt.
The weather certainly did not suit either side, both of whom looked as though they longed to pass the ball and grasp hold of the game but without much success. After an uneventful start, in which both sides failed to create any real chances, Balliol took the lead against the wind. A free kick on the left was played to Julian Rose – hat-trick hero of Balliol’s semi-final triumph – who skipped past his marker and laid the ball off to James Doree to shoot home from 25 yards. This was, however, an open game and with the wind continuing to make life difficult, New equalised just ten minutes after falling behind. A corner from the right was swung into the box by captain Kevin Doak and flicked on by Danny Bamford eluding Balliol’s defence – so often vulnerable from set pieces this season – and knocked in at the far post by Thomas Osborne. For a while the goal sparked a flurry of New attacks, including a Doak volley that managed to hit the underside of the crossbar and the post before bouncing out.
Yet although New might have felt reinvigorated they would also have been aware that they faced a battle into the wind in the second half if they were to retain their newfound parity. Indeed, as the game opened up in the second half, Balliol looked increasingly assured on the ball, while New were unlucky to have goalscorer Osborne forced off with injury. However, it took a long kick from Balliol keeper Nick Tufton and a great deal of strength from Ed Thompson to open up the New defence. Thompson latched onto the bouncing ball, muscled his way between the two New centre-backs and slotted home from fifteen yards to give his side a crucial advantage. The match was far from concluded: Tufton was forced to make an outstanding low save to his left to deny New a second equaliser. But when Thompson completed his brace, the door was effectively closed on New’s impressive cup campaign. It was, perhaps, the fairest result of all. A day to savour in Balliol’s largely miserable season, while a disappointing moment for New who might just dream of bigger and better things in the top flight next year.
• Queen’s eased to the Premier Division title, securing the top spot with a 2- 0 victory over defending champions Magdalen. St Catz took second place, trailing the leaders by four points.ARCHIVE: 0th week TT 2005