Oxford (203-7) beat Cambridge (200 all out) by 3 wicketsOxford’s women claimed victory in an oustanding Varsity match, edging out a resurgent light blue side by just three wickets.Oxford won the toss and invited Cambridge to bat. Georgia Gale Grant and Lottie Waller took a quick wicket each to remove both Tab openers within overs and Oxford had the early advantage. However this brought together Cambridge’s Jane Allison and Kate Hawton who, after a watchful start built a strong partnership, dispatching wayward bowling towards the very short boundaries. Oxford were very thankful for a trademark miserly spell from Helen Turner who eventually removed Hawton and followed this with a second wicket to leave Cambridge 118-4, with the game well balanced.The spectators were treated to an exceptional innings from Jane Allison, who demonstrated a superb array of shots and frustrated the Oxford bowlers by successfully keeping the strike. Cambridge looked to be running away with the game until Gale Grant brought herself back into the attack with the score on 156-4. She took wickets with her fifth and sixth balls, and with the first ball of the following over became the first woman ever to take a hat-trick at Lord’s.Oxford, taking heart from their captain’s tremendous bowling performance, raised their game and Alexis Blane secured a run-out with a tremendous direct hit as Allison tried to secure the strike. Allison reached her hundred off 141 balls and put on 35 for the ninth wicket with Kim Roach before she was last out to Blane for an exceptional 109. The Cambridge side seemed sure they had already wrapped up the game, forgetting that on a field as small as the Nursery Ground, 201 was definitely an achievable target.Oxford lost Sarah Berman early, leaving Gale Grant to anchor the innings. She built partnerships with Emma Collins, who made 18, and Natalie Wells, 23, but after 25 overs Oxford only had 86 on the board. Helen Turner began to up the tempo, playing beautifully until she was dismissed for 29. Gale Grant reached fifty off 126 balls, having held the innings together and allowed her partners to score freely. Most people on the ground were wondering whether she had left it too late to accelerate, but 14 runs were scored off the 44th over and for the first time, Oxford looked to be favourites. In a final twist in a see-saw match, Gale Grant fell for 53 in the 45th over, leaving Oxford 16 to win with two new batsmen at the crease and most of the team with no fingernails left.ARCHIVE: 0th week MT 2005

Big changes are planned for St Aldate's over the next few years. Development plans will see the previously unused part of the city transformed from derelict buildings and waste land to an exclusive new shopping area.
The site, which streches from Marks and Spencer to St Aldate's, will play host to a new shopping centre, offices and further student accommodation. A new restaurant is planned for the basement of the site, which is currently home to the Post Office's storage area.
Oxford-based planning consultants  John Phillips Planning are acting on behalf of Merton College in the proceedings, and believe that real progress will be made by the end of the year. Development consultancy company the Carlyle Group have already signed long lease agreements with the college.
Nik Lyzba, from Oxford planning consultants John Phillips Planning, reported "It will not be a large shopping arcade and will not be in competition with the new Westgate centre. But it will add a new dimension to shopping in Oxford, which many people believe has become pretty poor."

This album comes complete with an accompanying essay booklet which explains the story behind every song. The essays themselves are fascinating, but leave the lyrics looking facile and pedestrian. It’s tough to weave a strong narrative through a song, and much harder still if everyone already knows how the story goes.

The other real issue with Elegies is that when you listen to 11 iLiKETRAiNS songs in a row, they tend to form a miserable, homogenous blur. So I was interested to hear whether, in a live setting, they would be able to shake off the strangely flat feeling that pervades the album.

They start well, opening with 25 Sins, which details the Great Fire of London in 1666 and is one of the more memorable moments on the new album. Next up is Terra Nova, from Progress Reform, which remains their best song by a long way. It’s a towering piece, glacial and magnificent, and is a clear marker for what this band is really capable of.

Sadly, it turns out that listening to 11 iLiKETRAiNS songs live is also a bit of a homogenous experience. Songs from the new album blur inoffensively but unrecognisably into one another, while being painfully shown up by early single A Rook House For Bobby. More than anything, you just wish vocalist David Martin would, just once, break out of his cut-glass baritone and let his voice show some emotion (unless, of course, arch historical doom-mongering counts as an emotion, in which case he’s possibly the most emotional man in Oxford).

Not that their set is without its highlights. The background visuals are hypnotic and genuinely add to the songs’ content (when they’re not hidden behind the drummer, that is), and when the band climax into storms of violent noise it’s hard to deny their raw instrumental power.

At one point, someone in the audience shouts “This is an awful place,” echoing a line from Terra Nova and referring, of course, to the shiny new Carling Academy Oxford. “It’s not that bad,” frontman Martin replied, and he’s right. It really isn’t that bad, just lacking somewhat in character. And for all their unusual subject matter, iLiKETRAiNS’ music could also do with a little more character. A little heart. And a lot more variety.

Vice-Chancellor John Hood stood up to recent pressure from government over policing campus extremists yesterday.Recent government policy suggested heavier 'policing' at campuses, as a way of tackling political extremism. In his annual speech, marking the start to the new academic year, he stated that he was aware of the need to stay vigilant, particularly after concerns were raised that campuses were potential breeding and recruitment grounds for terrorists.He said that it was a 'major priority' to increase awareness of Islam in the West, but that the university should not be made into a 'quasi-secret service'. Hood warned that the university must be aware of any threats to free speech and their academic freedom and that 'public policy, designed to address the undeniably real security worries about terrorism, does not undermine that very scholarly endeavour which can help to build and propagate knowledge and understanding in society.'

Health and safety inspectors have closed St Peter’s college bar after "significant failings" were unearthed during the summer, leading to the bar manager’s departure.

The bar, which was managed by the College rather than the JCR, failed a random health and safety inspection during the summer vacation and has subsequently been declared a health hazard, unfit to serve food and drink to students.

Its closure prompted the departure of the manager, Nick Tilley, who declined to comment and is now working at St John’s College.

The College’s Domestic Bursar, Jean Wright, also refused to comment.

Members of the JCR have taken matters into their own hands to ensure that its closure will not have a negative impact on Freshers’ Week by setting up a temporary bar until it reopens in January next year.

One third-year St Peter’s student criticised the College’s neglect of the bar, accusing them of "seriously neglecting their responsibilities by allowing the bar to become, and continue to be, unfit to serve students."

Another student at St Peter’s added, "This raises questions about why the College allowed the bar to get into such a state."

St Peter’s JCR President, Joel Mullan, agreed that the situation had resulted from negligence on the part of the College, but was positive that a temporary student-run bar would provide a satisfactory solution.

"The bar should not have been allowed to reach this stage of disrepair, and it’s unfortunate that these problems were not discovered earlier so that the work could have been completed during the vacation. Whilst a temporary bar is not ideal, we are making the best of a bad situation."

Despite the temporary solution, third-year student Matthew Sherman said he felt that the bar’s closure would still have a negative impact on Freshers’ Week. "The bar was a big part of the social life of the College, so this is a shame for all of us, but especially the freshers. The bar was certainly important for me in my early days at Oxford for meeting people and settling in," he said.

During Freshers’ Week, the temporary bar will be located in a marquee on the College’s Hannington Quad, before being moved to a small room between the St Peter’s JCR and gym.

Second-year St Peter’s student Kris Doyle, who is helping to run the temporary bar, is confident that the disruption to new students’ social lives will be minimal. "While the closure of the bar was unexpected it will not prove to be a problem. A dedicated group of students have rallied to ensure that there will be a college bar of some description and that the freshers will still have the same opportunity to get drunk as generations of previous St Peter’s students," he said.

"Far from being an outright negative, this turn of events has brought many of the current students together in order to preserve an essential part of college life and ensure that the new students feel the same sense of community spirit that the rest of us felt in our first few days."When the bar re-opens in January after renovation, it will be managed by students at St Peter’s.

An asylum seeker who believed she would be unable to afford her place at Oxford has had her fees waived by St John’s College.

Sholeem Griffin, whose family left Pakistan for the UK in 2003, initially thought that she would have to reject her offer from St John’s College to study biochemistry, because as an international student she would have had to pay £10,000 a year in tuition fees.

However, she was told by St John’s that she would be able to take up her place with financial help from the College and the JCR on the condition that she gained three ‘A’s at A-level. She went on to gain four ‘A’s and a ‘B’.

Describing how she felt when she learned that she would be able to come to Oxford, she said, "That was awesome really; I didn’t expect that. I was a bit disappointed at the time. I thought I wasn’t going to university until this whole thing got sorted out.

"I knew the fees were high for an international student and that it would be difficult. The alternative was sitting at home because I really couldn’t do much more with education as at every university it was the same problem."

Sholeem’s family came to the UK because they feared that they would not be able to practise Christianity in Pakistan, and were granted asylum in Wales. However, immigration law states that only those granted refugee status, which Sholeem did not have, can apply as home students to a British university.

She chose to apply to Oxford in 2006, after encouragement from her school, hoping that the long interval between sending off her UCAS form and starting her degree might have led to a change in her status as an asylum seeker.

St John’s JCR President Rhys Jones said, "I think it’s really good that she’s coming to study her chosen degree here. It’s encouraging to see the College using its funds to help those who would otherwise be unable to realise their ambitions." St John’s Equal Opportunities Officer Sophie Brockmann added, "The advantage of studying at a rich college like St John’s is that students do have help available to them." Sholeem hopes to study for a master’s degree after Oxford, and eventually go on to do research.

OUSU has clashed with the Oxford Union following a financial review that revealed generous subsidies for Union advertising were being paid without OUSU’s knowledge.

Demands for more money were sent to the prestigious debating society, including for a stall at Freshers’ Fair, advertising in The Oxford Student and distributing Union promotional material in freshers’ packs.

The University’s Senior Proctor, Dr James Forder, attempted to pressure OUSU into reducing their demands following a request from Union President Luke Tryl.

OUSU President Martin McCluskey said, "We discovered that the deal the Union were given was not viable, and came up with a new price which was at cost and presented them with a fairly reasonable package.

"We made sure that we’re not subsidising Union services. Our financial advisers from the University were advising us that the cost we were charging was right.

"OUSU hasn’t really had a working relationship with the Union in the past two years," he added.

Union President Luke Tryl denied that OUSU’s offer was fair. "The deal was overpriced given that we’re a student organisation and given that we don’t exist to make a profit," he said.

The Union responded to OUSU’s requests by enlisting the help of the Senior Proctor to moderate the financial demands. "They were called in to get our status within the University clarified," said Tryl. "The University encouraged them [OUSU] to treat us more favourably. From what I gather they [the Senior Proctors] put pressure on OUSU to treat us more favourably."

OUSU Vice-President (Finance) Rich Hardiman said that the toughening of OUSU’s financial demands came after University authorities criticised its management and called for a reordering of its finances. "In the past it was a very generous deal that didn’t treat them [the Union] as a commercial client. We were told by the University to stop making ‘mates rates’ for people.

"As a result, we re-evaluated our relationship with the Union," he said.

He also claims they were advised by the Senior Proctor that "although the Union is not officially part of the University, it is morally". OUSU responded by informing the University authorities that they had no jurisdiction in the matter.

"For the Proctors to lean in and say you can’t charge this much would be like a University department going to a limited company and telling them how to run their business," Hardiman said. "We took on board their concern, but at the same time I had to prioritise running the company."

A compromise was eventually reached, although the Union decided against buying advertising space in The Oxford Student. The Union will continue to pay for a stall at freshers’ fair and for sending out packs to freshers at a rate of £800 a year, well below the initial £1500 demanded by OUSU.

Tryl claimed to be pleased with the outcome, saying, "It was the best deal given the circumstances. In the end we get a deal that, far from being satisfactory, was still pretty good for the Union and its membership."

He also suggested, however, that the dispute had damaged the relationship between the two organisations. "If they treat us in a commercial light then we will be forced to do the same with them," he warned. "This is a step back in our relationship with OUSU. I hadhoped for our two organisations to work much more closely together, and I think this makes us working with them difficult in the future."The Senior Proctor was unavailable for comment.

A review of Oxford’s Permanent Private Halls published last week has voiced concerns about their practices, academic standards and the experiences of those who attend them.

The ‘Review of the Permanent Private Halls associated with the University of Oxford’, published in the University Gazette last Thursday, criticised PPHs for not always conforming to the "liberal ethos" which characterises the rest of the University.

The seven halls under scrutiny, four of which are Roman Catholic, two Anglican and one Baptist, have also been questioned as to their suitability for school leavers.

The document recommends that the University assume greater control or let the PPHs risk losing their University licence, and it warns that "substantial and challenging changes in some, if not all the halls" will be required.

The report states, "The admission of such young students into an overwhelmingly mature community of students does not provide the best learning environment for them or remotely replicate what is understood in the University at large as the collegiate experience of education." It concludes, "The right of those Permanent Private Halls which are principally communities of mature students to matriculate school-leaver-aged students should be withdrawn."

In response to this criticism, Wycliffe Hall Principal Revd Dr Richard Turnbull pointed out the panel’s failure to consult students at the private halls. He said it would have been useful to "find out what students think about their environment and setting".

Turnbull added, however, that he welcomed the report and that he "looked forward to working with the University in implementing these findings". He added, "All that is needed is a positive dialogue between the Permanent Private Halls and the University."

The report deals specifically with Wycliffe Hall in an appendix. It says, "There is a persistent concern outside Wycliffe about whether the strong emphasis on the evangelical tradition in some way inflects the teaching of theology and ministry into a narrow compass of interpretation.

"The panel feels that Wycliffe Hall does need to make a determined effort to clarify these matters to the rest of the University if it is to achieve manifest harmony with the University’s principles of education."

James Goldspink, a theology student at Wycliffe, raised concern that recent reports were unfair. "Those people who expressed views have only expressed upset. Everybody thinks it is a terrible shame about what is being reported about Wycliffe," he said. "Wycliffe are top of the private halls’ academic list. Therefore you cannot accuse us of not conforming to Oxford’s liberal standards."The panel has recommended to the University that a supervisory committee appointed by the Vice-Chancellor inspect the halls and make an annual report to Council.

I meet Jason Braham in a West London pub on a sunny day in September. He and his wife Julienne have come up to London from their new home in Wales where they have opted to live a quiet life as artists. It is the day before the anniversary of Lucy’s death and he and Julienne are preparing to go to a festival where a band will be dedicating their set to Lucy.

Jason talks to me about his daughter. He describes her as a "very good, friendly person" but says, "I don’t think she was a fool in this case. She knew the sort of character that Jaggs was. His is a fairly obscene bunch, really. She wouldn’t have normally had anything to do with him. The guy rolled up with this wretched cat.

"Since her death we’ve found a load more out about her as a friend from her pals, because you don’t necessarily know your own children incredibly well. I mean, you know them, but I hadn’t realised just how much fun she was. We always thought she was possibly even slightly reclusive because she would like her own space, and often didn’t like going out to the pub every night or anything like that. But, when she did go out, she was the life and soul, apparently."

Contrary to some reports in the press, Jason’s daughter and Jaggs were not friends. She was three years older than him and they only knew each other vaguely through their parents.

Both Jason and Julienne Braham taught Jaggs, at preparatory school and at Harrow respectively. He tells me what he remembers of Jaggs at Harrow.

"He was very clever; he had a very high IQ. He didn’t work particularly hard… his results weren’t particularly good. He left his first boarding house and went to another one, and of course we now know why. The question that people ask is if enough was done to follow that up. I suspect it wasn’t. It was an attempt to force sex on a boy, a junior boy and, later on, we also heard in court that that’s the way he saw sex in general, even when it was consensual. He obviously fantasised about raping someone… He obviously had some sort of obsession with her [Lucy] because that came out in court, but we didn’t know that; nor did she."

Jason expresses his conviction that staff at Harrow could have done more to prevent the sequence of events that led to his daughter’s death. "You’ve got 800 boys you’re responsible for [at Harrow]. I reckon he was a danger to them, given his past record, on that score, and he was a danger to all the daughters and all the wives and the other staff. But simply no one was thinking about it. No one was recognising that he was a danger.

"This might sound hard, but I do believe that pressure on teachers, above all, to achieve the ‘perfect score’ with their examination candidates, a knock-on effect of the obsession with the ‘league table’ as a measure of a school’s worth has impacted on their family lives and on their ability to take a balanced view of their role in the community. In a less frenetic time I am sure the degeneration of William Jaggs and the behaviour of his circle would have been addressed long before the crisis was reached."

He describes William’s parents, Alan and Stella, as being "a little too innocent" in the way they handled their son’s behaviour. He says, "They were too amateur in the way they dealt with the problem. Alan took Will away to the country, to try to get him away from the influence of the gang he was with, to get him away from drugs and his drug dealer, thinking this would cure him, or at least would help."

Despite this criticism, Jason seems tolerant and forgiving of Jaggs’ parents.

"My wife has had Stella round for coffee," Jason tells me. "Not to talk about the crime, obviously, but to talk about how she was coping. I think for me it would be difficult, actually. Knowing exactly what their son did to my daughter I’d find it quite difficult to sit down… although I don’t actually bear him [Alan Jaggs] any malice."

I then ask him how he feels that Jaggs is only to be detained in a secure hospital, rather than a prison.

"There is an illiberal part of me that would have liked to see him spend time in a regular jail first, where he would see just how foul even hardened criminals consider crimes like his. It would also serve to remind people that Jaggs is a criminal and not just insane."

When we broach the subject of Jaggs’ drug habits, Jason tells me that he has been carefully following reports about the dangers of drugs. He is clearly concerned about the possible link between cannabis use and mental illness. "A lot of those reports were from the nineties but I don’t think skunk had appeared on the scene until a few years ago. So I would have thought the effects on teenagers now, who will be starting with skunk, will be much more devastating. I think actually this is just the tip of the iceberg."

He tells me he is considering giving a talk at the festival he will later be attending warning about "drugs and teenagers and the general complacency of my generation and it’s acceptance of… how it’s inevitable that teenagers take drugs. I think some people, because they did drugs themselves… it sort of holds them back from speaking out."

Speaking about his daughter’s death, Jason tells me, "Obviously, we will never properly come to terms with it; it would be very hard. But we decided to try to follow our creative work; I certainly would have found it difficult to go back to Harrow, if not impossible. And I think actually they would have found it awkward, too, because other people involved are still there and you can’t just carry on as if nothing’s happened. I have said we’re going to take in young graduates to work alongside us as artists. When they leave art school it’s quite difficult to carry on making art; you want to get a job. I’m hoping we can give people the chance to spend up to a year with us, working alongside me as a potter or Julie as a painter. Because that’s, in a way, what we were doing for Lucy."

Dons have forced one of Vice-Chancellor John Hood’s key modernisers to resign from the University Council after a rebellion against giving him a new term in office.

Sir Victor Blank, who read history at St Catherine’s College and is Chairman of Lloyds-TSB, has announced that he will not seek re-election after seven years as a non-academic member of the Council.

Over the summer, the Council voted 15-2 to offer Sir Victor a new term of four years on the Council, the main policy-making body of Oxford University, responsible for academic position and strategic direction. It contains 26 members, of which 4 are non-academics.

Congregation, the University’s supreme government body composed of 4,000 academic and administrative staff, effectively blocked this proposal by collecting almost 250 signatures calling for a full debate and vote. With the prospect of a vote on his position being held on 26 September, Sir Victor announced that he would not seek re-election.

Sir Victor was eager to go forward with the debate and vote but was persuaded not to by John Hood, the University Vice-Chancellor. According to the Financial Times, Hood was concerned that the debate risked damaging the reputation of the University regardless of the outcome, which would have taken attention away from the launch of a new fund-raising campaign.

It was also feared that a row could cause difficulties for the Vice-Chancellor, who is due to decide whether he wishes to seek a two-year extension when his tenure in office ends in October 2009.

Hood’s term as Vice-Chancellor has already divided public opinion. In 2006, he proposed for Council to have a majority of non-academic members, which would have brought Oxford in line with all other British universities except for Cambridge. The current Council would have been replaced by a 15-member Council with 8 non-academic members, including the chairman. An amended proposal was defeated at a meeting of Congregation and a subsequent postal ballot of Congregation members was also rejected.

Mark Robson, Treasurer of Lady Margaret Hall, led the opposition to Sir Victor’s re-election. He claimed to be worried that allowing Sir Victor to stand for re-election would be contrary to the corporate governance principles espoused by Hood and his supporters in their arguments for reform.

Hood has previously argued that the University has to comply with the Committee of University Chairmen’s (CUC) code of practice, which advises that non-executive members should remain for no longer than nine years on Council.

Robson demanded that guidelines on terms of office should be adhered to by the University.

In a document circulated to senior academics in June, Robson said, "I am not, however, aware of any particular skill or expertise that he [Sir Victor] brings to bear that it would be impossible to find in any new external member of Council, such that it would be necessary to invoke the exception in the CUC code. […] To extend his term automatically to eleven years (or more) in the face of accepted best practice in corporate governance would, in my view, be a great institutional mistake at a time when the University’s governance arrangements remain under intense national, political and press scrutiny."

It is uncertain whether Sir Victor, a supporter of Hood, will remain on the committee that appoints the Vice-Chancellor. He had served on this committee when it recommended Hood’s appointment in 2003.

This is not the first time that Sir Victor has been involved in disputes with dons. In 2006 he used lawyers to obtain an apology from the Master of St Catherine’s College, Professor Roger Ainsworth, after sitting together on a committee investigating the distribution of ‘quantum’, the system for allocating money between colleges and the University.As chairman, Sir Victor sent the committee’s recommendations to Hood and the chair of the Conference of Colleges. Prof Ainsworth then wrote to the Conference of Colleges with a response, the content of which is not known. Sir Victor reacted to this by hiring the libel specialist law firm, Carter-Ruck, who succeeded in obtaining a retraction and an apology from Professor Ainsworth.