Friday 24th October 2025
Blog Page 3

“NOR GLOM OF NIT?”: ‘Going Postal’ reviewed

0

“NEITHER RAIN NOR SNOW NOR GLOM OF NIT CAN STAY THESE MESENGERS ABOT THEIR DUTY.” It is this (somewhat incomplete) motto of the Post Office setting that captures in a sentence the irreverent humour of this charming version of Going Postal, this year’s Oriel Garden Play.

Going Postal is a novel written by Terry Pratchett in his fantasy Discworld universe, with this performance using a pre-existing adaptation for the stage by Stephen Briggs. It follows the story of conman turned postman extraordinaire Moist von Lipwig (Maggie Kerson), whose criminal alter ego, Albert Spangler, is hanged at the beginning of the play, before miraculously surviving. It is Danann Kilburn’s cold, imposing Lord Vetinari who ensures Moist survives in order to offer him a choice: work for him to rebuild the Post Office, or die. He is taken by his parole officer, the robotic but endearing Golem Mr Pump (Lydia Armstrong), to his new job, and events rapidly escalate from there.

Cast performances were a standout aspect of the play. Maggie Kerson’s portrayal of Moist von Lipwig was replete with self-assured, effortless charm. This did morph into a more emotionally genuine portrayal, following Moist’s character arc of becoming more than just a “totally untrustworthy” individual. Kerson was able to project effectively even in the noisier environment of a garden play, sustaining frenzied mannerisms as Moist’s plans to one-up competitors, such as the Great Trunk Company, become ever more hare-brained and desperate. Kilburn’s humourless Vetinari also casts a looming shadow over the play, the “tyrant” who gets things done whatever the cost. Another highlight was Paul Becsi as Reacher Gilt, a Disney-esque villain with the unctuous affect of a suave American executive, equipped with a gem-encrusted cane and eye-patch to boot. He and the board members of the Great Trunk Company proved entertaining antagonists, comic but still carrying an edge of peril, all empty smiles and hinted threat.

The ensemble maintained an equally high standard of quality. From Samuel Forrest’s loveable, pin and stamp-obsessed Stanley, crotchety old “junior post-master” Groat (Chris Morson), and Lara Machado as the bemused and deadpan Dearheart, Pratchett’s colourful cast of characters were brought to life with aplomb. The sprawling nature of Pratchett’s plot required considerable multi-roling, but the costumes and portrayals were varied enough between characters that distinguishing who was who was relatively easy. 

Perhaps the most electrifying moment of the play came in the climax, with nearly the entire cast arranged in factions onstage. Alone, the costumes were impressive. But together as one, it was a slice of Discworld manifest before you. Clothing of especial note included Lipwig’s gold outfit later in the play, with golden trainers (adorned with little wings) and a similarly coloured winged hat that certified his role as a Hermesian messenger. 

The quality of costume also extended to props. The easel placed downstage left produced some amusing physical comedy, with characters replacing it alternately with a black square, a photograph portrait of Reacher Gilt, and the bastardised motto of the Post Office, among others. Every change brought more frustration, thus becoming an effective recurring gag. The newspapers, too, were printed to be readable from a distance, giving the world a touch more materiality.

I was left more ambivalent by the staging, however. At times, I could not help feeling that the set would have benefited from some of the intimacy of a traditional studio. The actors did much to fill the space, as it were, but the stage’s sparseness became most apparent during transitions. The minimal set design (usually one table and chair planted centrally downstage), while creatively used, contributed to this sense. The greatest potential issue came in the sense that the logistics of the garden play setting were slowing down a show reliant on its flow and continuous action to stop its three-hour span (while always eventful) from dragging. 

Some scenes, though, did benefit from the greater scale offered by the garden play. Director Teddy Farrand noted how the production could “use all of [the quad] for the frontage of the post office – we could have Moist crossing the whole quad rather than just a small studio theatre. I was really excited about that just because I think Discworld’s a bit random, it’s antiquated.” Indeed, one of the funniest moments came when Moist did just that, hurling himself offstage and pelting across Oriel Quad to close off the first half of the show.

What was nonetheless most impressive about the staging was its avoidance of that notorious trap of black-box theatre – a feeling of disconnect from the wider world of the play. Going Postal evades this not only by having its characters interact regularly with the college setting outside the stage, but by also feeling like the stage is simply a fragment of a wider world. What Farrand succeeds in is the sense that Discworld is a living, breathing entity, something that would be just waiting for you if you were simply to peek backstage or in the wings.

This play was generally accessible to those without knowledge of Pratchett’s Discworld series. Admittedly, Farrand acknowledged “being a little bit untraditional”, having “taken a few leniencies” with the original source material both in terms of necessary cuts and in staging the beautiful madness that is Pratchett’s world. Bar some ambiguities over just exactly what the “clacks” of the Great Trunk Company are, for the most part an audience member can follow along with no knowledge of Discworld and have as much fun as the most committed fan – for whom I am told there are still knowing jokes to be caught.

What Going Postal manages to tantalisingly capture as it gets into its stride, much like the character of Lipwig himself, is the underlying magic and bizarre, chaotic wonder that fuels Pratchett’s Discworld. Farrand’s passion for the franchise is always evident throughout the show, and such passion and enthusiasm go a long way in theatrical terms. “The mail must be delivered!”, Lipwig cries at one point – and so too does Going Postal, in the end, deliver.

On Gravel and Quads: Woolf’s Oxbridge in ‘A Room of One’s Own’

0

Virginia Woolf’s extended essay A Room of One’s Own is probably the most important 20th century piece of writing concerning women’s place in literature and education. It illustrates the power of the patriarchy in schooling through a simple, but very familiar, allegory of grass and gravel. 

It was thus that I found myself walking with extreme rapidity across a grass plot. Instantly a man’s figure rose to intercept me…His face expressed horror and indignation. Instinct rather than reason came to my help, he was a Beadle; I was a woman. This was the turf; there was the path. Only the Fellows and Scholars are allowed here; the gravel is the place for me.

In Woolf’s imaginary ‘Oxbridge’ (a fictionalised version of Oxford and Cambridge representing all their men’s colleges), turf is not reserved for men explicitly but for Fellows and Scholars, who nonetheless must be male according to the rules of admission. The Beadle is so confident that Woolf is not a Fellow or a Scholar precisely because she appears as a woman. 

‘Turf’, then, represents the status quo, the system of men’s colleges that ensure women are relegated to the gravel. In maintaining the status quo and removing any woman from Oxbridge’s turf, women’s education must necessarily be secondary, for “turf is better walking than gravel”, and without the anchoring of turf and the patriarchal power systems it reinforces, one is removed “from any contact with facts”. Gravel, in Oxbridge, is the preserve of those not worthy of grass, which includes commoners, scouts, and, of course, women. 

A Room of One’s Own was originally a series of lectures delivered at Girton and Newnham Colleges in Cambridge, and Woolf continues through her fictional Oxbridge to these women’s colleges. Here, “not a penny could be spared for ‘amenities’; for partridges and wine, beadles and turf, books and cigars, libraries and leisure”. Unlike at the men’s colleges, where turf is an ‘amenity’ available only to the upper classes, at Girton and Newnham College, and Somerville College, and Lady Margaret Hall – all amalgamated into Woolf’s fictional college ‘Fernham’ – there is ‘grass’ instead. Here, “somebody was in a hammock”; the grasses of the garden are “wild” and “unkempt”. The women’s colleges of Oxford and Cambridge reclaimed the turf for themselves by making it not just available for everyone, but by treating it as ‘grass’: wild, natural and unkempt, rather than repressive turf.. 

This is a tradition that, even today, is maintained in the former women’s colleges of Oxford and Cambridge. The pristine turf of Christ Church and King’s College cannot be walked on even by the scholars and fellows any more; they are instead to be admired from a distance, with the modern equivalent of Woolf’s Oxbridge beadles, the college porter, ready to steer all trespassers back on to the gravel. At Somerville, Lady Margaret Hall, and other similarly relaxed colleges known for being more progressive than their central compatriots , grass is to be walked on and laid upon. 

This reclamation is a hundred years in the making and resists “300 years in succession” of tradition. There seems no greater, seemingly innocuous, reminder of the strides women’s education has taken in the ninety-seven years since Woolf wrote A Room of One’s Own than the ability of students at some colleges to have sunny picnics on the quad, where once gravel would have been their lot.

Dear Reader,

0

It has been so long since last I felt 

your fingertips tracing my pages,

cascading shivers across my spine. 

I have missed your smile,

and the way your laugh 

reaches your eyes;

I would do anything 

to kiss your happiness.

Stay awhile, please,

let me calm your racing mind, think 

of me as the moon, pulling 

your cool waves of calamity 

into tides. 

I will listen, and wrap up

your worries like gifts 

and cradle them close until 

they dissolve at sunrise.

Pause for a moment dear reader, 

Stop and stay please, 

Do not glance to the other pages, allow me 

to savour the memory of your face, tuck it away 

for a rainy day, and breathe a sigh 

of incandescent happiness. 

I guess this is goodbye dear reader,

come back to me someday

when you’re pink with pleasure,

or grey and blue, 

and I’ll always be there for you.

Perhaps it was coincidence not fate

that brought us together this way,

but I hope you treasure these moments,

mull them over in your mind 

and think of me sometime,

It’d be a shame 

If this was our last goodbye,

Cillian Murphy does it again

0

Since his generation-defining performance in Oppenheimer (2023) two years ago, Cillian Murphy has shown little interest in playing it safe. Having collaborated already on the understated, unflinchingly raw historical drama Small Things Like These (2024), he has joined forces once more with Belgian director Tim Mielants. The duo first met filming the third season of Peaky Blinders, beginning what has quickly blossomed into a rich and dynamic creative partnership.

With Steve, Murphy has once again proved himself a force to be reckoned with. Playing the headmaster of a residential home for troubled boys in conflict with the law, he brings star-power to a film which otherwise might have felt flat. His performance is subtle and multi-layered, alternating between quiet moments of anguish and outbreaks of frustration. The deep emotional pain which underpins Steve’s drive to help others is palpable throughout, as he tackles the numerous daily challenges he encounters in his job, in particular his attempts to help the brilliant but troubled Shy (Jay Lycurgo).

In adapting his book Shy for the screen, Max Porter has made the unusual decision to change the perspective of the drama from Shy to Steve. In doing so, he has created a film which, rather than undermining the achievements of the book, arguably strengthens them by examining how it might feel to be on the other side of things. Steve thus approaches the staff of the residential home with a much greater level of detail, turning them into more relatable figures. We are introduced, for instance, to Steve’s struggles with the injuries he sustained in a car crash, his guilt at the effects of the crash, and his resulting struggles with substances and alcohol, all of which are interwoven into his daily sense of mission.

Steve is also, of course, a topical and timely examination of how society treats those who differ from the norm. It is forthright in the way it advocates for the possibility of a solution for troubled boys which focuses on rehabilitation rather than punishment, but it is also realistic in acknowledging the limits of such proposals. As Steve puts it, “I mean it’s chaotic, right, but we think it’s working, and if you lock these kids up and throw away the key…we feel we’re doing something as an alternative.”

As with his previous film Small Things Like These, Mielants has chosen a theme which speaks to the needs of the marginalised. Exemplified by the behaviour of the news crew who come to film at the school, many in society view the kind of troublemakers Steve cares for with a mixture of horrified fascination, righteous indignation, and apathy. The deep dedication and love Steve and his team show towards the boys is moreover contrasted with the unthinking indifference of higher-ups when they decide to close the home half-way through term-time.

Mielants declines to give his audience easy answers to difficult questions. The positives of the boys’ personalities are highlighted, but their behaviour at times is difficult to make excuses for. At the same time, Porter’s screenplay emphasises, with for instance the character of Shy, the deep trauma underlying many of the boys’ antisocial actions. It seeks to make the audience care about them on a personal level, so that they become more than just statistics, but at the same time avoids dealing with moral absolutes. The benefits of such a Finnish-style system of rehabilitation are highlighted, but so too are some of the issues with it.

The audience thus walks away from the film without a complete sense of closure. It is designed to raise questions and provoke discussion, rather than to put forward a manifesto for change. Steve seeks to highlight the remarkable work done by those working in the field, and the ways that that work might sometimes not receive the credit it deserves, while also emphasising that no one should be seen as beyond hope of rehabilitation. At the same time, however, it does not shy away from questioning its own assumptions, and is stronger because of it, proving that a nuanced look at such issues is the most effective way to tackle them.

Overall, Steve is another huge achievement for Murphy, his production company Big Things Films, and his new partnership with Mielants. While he is supported by a top-tier cast who waste no time in demonstrating their talent, especially an exceptional Lycurgo, the film ultimately belongs to Murphy. His dedication to smaller, independent productions, and his frequent remarks about the value of acting as an art form, make clear the way in which he wants to contribute to cinema. Given the success of Small Things Like These and Steve, that contribution has never seemed more valuable.

What will the Schwarzman Centre mean for music at Oxford?

0

The new Schwarzman Centre for the Humanities, located in Oxford’s Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, opened on 30th September. 

Alongside teaching provisions, such as seminar rooms and the new Bodleian Humanities Library, the centre has various state-of-the-art performance and rehearsal spaces: a concert hall, a lecture hall which doubles as a drama theatre, a black box experimental performance space, a music studio, a recital hall and dance studio, and practice rooms that are available to be booked by music students. The performance spaces will be accessible for Oxford University Music Society (OUMS) ensembles and Oxford University Drama Society (OUDS) groups through a centralised booking system, which currently states that bookings are only available from January 2026. Additionally, the centre will be the new home of the Bate Collection of Musical Instruments and Archives. The faculty’s heirloom gamelan has already been moved into the recital hall. 

These spaces open up a huge range of exciting possibilities for performances by both students and professionals. Placing the humanities together in one building creates new pathways for collaboration between disciplines. The architects have paid detailed attention to the acoustic capabilities of the building: the concert hall was designed by Arup Acoustics to be completely soundproof, and the hall is connected to the black box theatre so that sound can be fed in, allowing for interdisciplinary performance. 

The Oxford Cultural Programme will be putting on a range of events, such as concerts, spoken word, dance, theatre, and art installations. Some of these will be in collaboration with the ten new Cultural Fellows that the centre has appointed. Concerts to look out for include the BBC Singers with composer Eric Whitacre, a concert with the London Gay Big Band, a performance by composer Anna Clyne, a music and spoken word performance with Kim Stanley Robinson and Brian Eno, and one by the Aurora Orchestra, known for playing complex classical repertoire from memory. The Sohmen Concert Hall isn’t quite big enough for a modern full-scale symphony orchestra, so the Aurora won’t be able to play its famous rendition of Stravinsky’s Rite of Spring, but will instead be treating audiences to a memorised performance of Mozart’s Symphony No. 41, ‘Jupiter’, and later of Bach’s Magnificat, amongst other works. 

There will also be collaborations between student ensembles and professional musicians, such as Oxford Sings: Carmina Burana (with Conductor Benjamin Nichols, Oxford Bach Choir, and Merton College Choir), as well as Splendour and Majesty (with the University’s Schola Cantorum and His Majesty’s Sagbutts and Cornetts). It is promising that the Oxford Cultural Programme is enthusiastic about giving students a chance to perform with visiting musicians, and to participate in masterclasses and workshops. 

The centre will open fully for teaching on 13th October, the start of Michaelmas term. Unfortunately for students like me who are entering their final year at Oxford, the Cultural Programme and access to the new performance spaces will only begin in April 2026, and the music studios are expected to open in week 4 of this term. 

The reception area outside the Sohmen Concert Hall features a bar downstairs and a cloakroom upstairs
Image Credit: Grace Greaves for Cherwell

Nonetheless, it’s clear that the Schwarzman and the Oxford Cultural Programme are looking to situate Oxford as a cultural centre on a global scale. With its bar, cloakroom, and modern architecture, the basement housing the concert hall and other performance spaces are reminiscent of London venues like the Southbank Centre and the Barbican. The upcoming events by the Oxford Cultural Programme further emphasise the centre’s desire to be at the cutting edge of new developments in the fields of the arts, humanities and performing arts. 

This is exciting for students who will have chances to witness and get involved with an expanding professional musical landscape. It’s also essential that the Schwarzman Centre continues to provide spaces for the rich student music scene that already exists at Oxford.  As long as the centre adheres to its stated aims – providing for current students and setting graduates up to “thrive in often complicated and rapidly transforming workplaces” – it should be an important new resource for student musicians in Oxford. 

Oxford alumnus Richard Robson awarded Nobel Prize in Chemistry

0

Brasenose College alumnus Richard Robson has been awarded the 2025 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for his research into the development of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs). Robson, now a professor at the University of Melbourne, was recognised by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences alongside Professor Susumu Kitagawa from Kyoto University and Professor Omar M. Yaghi from the University of California, Berkeley.

MOFs, a novel type of molecular architecture, combine metal ions and organic molecules to form crystalline frameworks with large cavities, allowing other molecules to move in and out freely. Since their discovery, MOFs have been used to extract water from desert air and to trap and store carbon dioxide, among other applications. 

Speaking to Cherwell, Robson described the award as “a great honour and pleasure”. Robson, who matriculated in 1955 to study Chemistry at Brasenose and later earned his DPhil from Oxford in 1962, first began exploring what would become MOFs in 1974. While building atomic models for his students in Melbourne, Robson realised that the models’ connection points determined the resulting molecular structure, leading him to wonder whether molecules could be designed to assemble into pre-determined shapes.

Continuing his interest, Robson combined copper and a four-armed organic molecule to create a crystalline framework with large cavities in 1989 – the first of what would later be coined by Yaghi as an MOF. In a paper published in the Journal of the American Chemical Society later that year, Robson outlined the novel architecture and its potential applications.

Within a year, Robson had proven his own ideas: he demonstrated that MOFs could allow for the exchange of ions, laying the conceptual foundation that future researchers – particularly Kitagawa and Yaghi – would build upon.

Professor Stephen Faulkner, Head of Oxford University’s Department of Chemistry, told Cherwell: “I am delighted to see the work of an Oxford Chemistry alumnus recognised with the Nobel Prize. This award serves as an inspiring reminder of the extraordinary impact our students and researchers can go on to make in the world.”

A spokesperson for Brasenose College told Cherwell: “We are immensely proud to congratulate our alumnus on being awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry. It is a joy to see one of our own excel in a field to which they have devoted so much of their life. Professor Robson’s work represents an incredibly impactful contribution to advancing humanity’s understanding of the chemical world, and Brasenose is delighted to see it receive global recognition.” 

With this honour, Robson joins 57 other Nobel Laureates who studied or taught at Oxford, including two from Brasenose.

Counterprotesters turn out for ‘women’s rights’ event

0

A demonstration organised by the campaign group Let Women Speak (LWS) took place today at Bonn Square. Around 100 counterprotestors also assembled, including members from the Oxford Green Party, Stand Up to Racism, and Oxford for Trans Rights (O4TR).

Although largely peaceful, two arrests were made under suspicion of a Section 5 Public Order offence – which concerns the use of threatening, abusive, or disorderly words or behavior, or the display of threatening or abusive writing. One of these individuals was later de-arrested.

Chief Inspector Jade Hewitt said: “I am pleased to say that the protests were peaceful and we worked with the organisers and partners to allow lawful protest to take place.”

Thames Valley Police enacted a Section 34 dispersal notice in Oxford’s city centre following the protest. Chief Inspector Hewitt said that “the purpose of this is in order to reduce the possibility of public harassment, alarm or distress and to prevent the risk of crime and disorder in the area”. She added that “we do not take these decisions lightly, but believe that in enacting this notice, it will help to reassure the local community that we do not tolerate antisocial behaviour.”

During the event and the counterprotest, police officers separated the groups on either side of Queen Street, with some disruption to traffic. Members of the Oxfordshire Patriots, a local right-wing activist group, were also seen in the area.

Willow Lock for Cherwell
Willow Lock for Cherwell

The original event was advertised by LWS as a “free speech event” and was anticipated to feature speeches critical of transgender rights. The event attracted a crowd of around 40 supporters who were holding Union Jack flags and banners which read “human female”.

Counterprotestors handed out flyers to members of the public, chanting “we don’t want your culture war”. Speakers from LWS responded, saying “no woman has a penis, no man has a vagina”. As well as transgender rights, the groups also clashed on issues including national borders and fascism.

The counterprotest was partly organised by O4TR. In an Instagram post ahead of the protest, O4TR called for its members to “rally in number to show that we will not tolerate transphobes and racists on our streets”.

Speaking after the event, an O4TR spokesperson told Cherwell: “counter-protests such as today’s are vitally important – not only on defending trans rights, but in fostering unity and hope at a time when right-wing politicians seek to turn us against one another on the basis of our origin.”

Councillor Max Morris, Green Party member of Oxford City Council, attended the counterprotest, telling Cherwell: “I was at today’s counter-protest to resist the far right and Posie Parker’s hateful rhetoric, both in a personal capacity as a non-binary person and as a local councillor.

“Oxford City Green Party councillors, candidates, and supporters have been showing up routinely to stand in solidarity with our diverse communities. At the last council meeting, we successfully called on Oxford City Council to stand with minority groups in our city and oppose the division stoked by the far right.”

LWS is an international movement founded by Kellie-Jay Keen, an anti-transgender activist also known as Posie Parker. Parker describes herself as women’s sex-based rights activist. The organisation seeks to defend “the rights of women” which it defines as “adult human females”.

Willow Lock for Cherwell

Ahead of the demonstration, a spokesperson from LWS told Cherwell: “We’re coming to Oxford at the request of local women, who also assist with organising the event. Our events are free speech and open mic, this means any woman can come and speak.”

The spokesperson added that LWS “gives voice to mothers, midwives, survivors, students, teachers, and countless others who know firsthand the importance of clarity in language, law, and single-sex protections”.

A plant and poster sale was also taking place at Bonn Square during the protest, with large crowds making their way through the Queen Street and Bonn Square area, including students in sub fusc who had recently matriculated.

Live reporting by Willow Lock, Conor Walsh, and Arina Makarina.

Somerville holds ground-breaking ceremony for new Ratan Tata Building

0

Somerville College has held a ground-breaking ceremony for the Ratan Tata Building, a new 700m² academic hub in the Radcliffe Observatory Quarter. The building will house the Oxford India Centre for Sustainable Development, as well as spaces for teaching and learning. 

Planning consent for the building was granted last month, with construction planned to commence from April next year. The project will take around 18 months, with completion planned to coincide with the 2027/28 academic year. The building will occupy the last plot for development in the Observatory Quarter, which is also home to the new Schwarzman Centre for the Humanities.

The ceremony was attended by Vice-Chancellor Irene Tracey, High Commissioner of India Vikram Doraiswami, and Natarajan Chandrasekaran, Chairman of the Tata Group, whose recent donation to Somerville was the largest in the College’s history. 

Chandrasekaran was awarded a Foundation Fellowship – Somerville’s highest honour for philanthropy – in recognition of the Tata Group’s support for the project.

Catherine Royle, Principal of Somerville College, commented : “Somerville has always gone its own way and blazed new trails. That’s why Somerville is proud to be playing a key role in Oxford University’s growing relationship with India.” 

Royle also described the building as bringing together “everything that is unique about our College”, adding: “it’s creative and it’s ambitious, but it’s also an example of living our principles of partnership and sustainability.”

The building is named after Ratan Tata, the late philanthropist and former Chairman of the Tata Group, making it the first building within the University to be named in honour of an Indian. 

Chandrasekaran said: “Mr Ratan Tata believed absolutely in the power of education to create a brighter future. In creating a permanent home for the Oxford India Centre for Sustainable Development at Somerville College, we see Mr Tata’s vision taking shape in a place he admired, in a form that will create a lasting bond of scholarship and hope between the University of Oxford and India.” 

Designed by Morris+Company, the Ratan Tata building will feature six tutor rooms, two research rooms, multiple seminar spaces, and a “chai ideas” room, described as a flexible shared space. The design incorporates Passivhaus principles, including a low-carbon timber structure and air-source heat pumps. A key feature is the Oculus, a large circular opening above the main entrance which will bring natural light into the building, while also glowing outward at night.

A spokesperson for Somerville told Cherwell that the College had “hosted a week-long internal consultation for students, fellows and staff” about the building, which included “360 feedback” that would be “fed into future planning discussions”. 

The spokesperson added: “Students are also kept informed about ongoing developments to the building through the attendance of JCR and MCR representatives at both Finance Committee and Governing Body.”

Investigation reveals serious asbestos management issues in the University

0

An investigation by Confront Power has revealed that Oxford University was recently in serious breach of asbestos management regulation. 

An audit conducted in 2019 revealed that information in the asbestos register was not consistent or up-to-date, with auditors PwC highlighting a critical risk that the University was non-compliant with UK legislation. A second audit in 2020 also revealed that the University had only surveyed 97 out of 160 of the highest-risk buildings, with only 23 of 72 asbestos management plans completed by their June 2020 due date.

Following Confront Power’s report, the University has emphasised that the procedures currently in place “pose no risk to the health of our students, staff, or visitors”.

A University spokesperson told Cherwell: “Like institutions across the UK higher education sector, the University has a diverse, complex estate, and we face legacy issues around asbestos-containing materials in some of our buildings.” They added that the University “proactively” engages in the risk management of asbestos in University buildings.

Confront Power is a not-for-profit organisation which specialises in investigative journalism.

The audits, obtained by Confront, were initially withheld by the University until the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) issued an order to release the documents. Oxford responded to the ICO claiming that disclosure of parts of the information in the audits could lead to panic among people inhabiting the buildings.

Confront Power reported in June 2025 that Oxford had paid out £850,000 in compensation for three claims regarding asbestos exposure internally. The University has 4,609 asbestos-containing materials across its buildings, including 24 buildings which are classified as “high-risk”.

An Oxford University and College Union (UCU) committee member said: “Oxford UCU is extremely concerned that information about the location and management of asbestos in University buildings – including the University’s own assessment that it is in breach of the Control of Asbestos Regulations – has been withheld from staff working in affected buildings.”

Asbestos was banned in the UK in 1999, and the government introduced the Control of Asbestos Regulations in 2004. ‘Asbestos’ refers to a group of naturally occurring heat and water resistant fibrous minerals that were used widely in construction in the past. Exposure to asbestos can lead to cancer or asbestosis through inhalation.     

Long-awaited St Anne’s accommodation reopens with some delays

0

Students have been delayed from moving into newly renovated accommodation in St Anne’s College. After a two year renovation project, 82 bedrooms across eight Victorian houses on Bevington Road were meant to come into use, however residents in one of the houses have been placed in temporary accommodation due to an issue identified in a final inspection. 

A spokesperson for the College informed Cherwell in September that the houses would be completed by the beginning of the academic year, however completion of 8 Bevington Road has been postponed for several weeks. Two additional houses, 9 and 10 Bevington Road, are on track to be completed at the end of Michaelmas term but will be used as conference stock for the rest of the academic year.

One of the students impacted by the delay explained that those who balloted for the rooms “were aware there was a tight deadline” and “that the completion of the work would be close to the start of term”. They added that the process was executed “without fuss” and that they are grateful “to move into brand new properties within the College campus”.

Other students living near Bevington Road complained about the “loud building work outside [their window]”, and an intermittent loud whirring noise which was reported throughout the night.

A spokesperson for St Anne’s told Cherwell: “Contractors have been working on the Bevington Road houses for two years, and unfortunately it is not possible to renovate 10 Victorian houses and transform these into sustainable accommodation fit for future generations of students without there being a degree of noise.”

The renovated accommodation was designed to bring the building into the 21st century, whilst maintaining its Victorian heritage. St Anne’s Domestic Bursar, John Banbrook, told Cherwell that the removal of gas boilers will “contribute to the college’s sustainability goals and will ensure the Bevington Road houses are eco-friendly and fit for the future”. He added that “maintaining the character of many Victorian features” was carefully considered.

Prior to the renovation, access to the buildings was through “ad hoc infill structures…in a poor state of repair”, whilst the landscaping did “not contribute positively to the appearance” of the local area. The original buildings’ rooms were also described as “outdated” and the heating system was “inefficient”, with kitchen and bathroom provisions “below par”.

The St Anne’s spokesperson added: “The renovation of our Bevington Road houses was a matter of necessity, not choice, as the houses were in urgent need of renovation to make them fit for future generations of students. A key factor in our regeneration was to increase our existing housing stock, increasing the number of rooms available for students and providing accessible rooms where needed.|

The final cost of the project was £14.8 million, with funding provided through a combination of donations and the College’s own funds. The College told Cherwell that the rooms would cost students the same rate as the other rooms in College, which is currently £1,974.90 per term for an ensuite room.

In November 2022, Cherwell reported that the Bevington Road renovation would create a room shortage. This resulted in St Anne’s requiring more students to live in accommodation in Summertown, 25 minutes away from College, and many others to arrange their own accommodation.

At the time, one St Anne’s student expressed their frustration to Cherwell, saying: “Many people applied [to St Anne’s] as one of their big selling points was three years of onsite accommodation.” Since then it has become policy for the majority of second years to arrange their own accommodation, often privately renting. Students privately renting have had to arrange second year housing and find a group to live with as early as Michaelmas term in first year, and have reported issues with high rent and bills, mould, and damp in rented properties.

In reply to concerns about the costs of private rent, Mr Banbrook said that the College “provides grant funding for those that need financial support as well as advice on renting in the local community”.

The College spokesperson added: “Unfortunately there was no way to achieve this [the renovations] without taking these rooms out of circulation while the work was being done. College has provided extensive support to assist students with finding other accommodation, including housing students in off-site St Anne’s buildings like Robert Saunders House, usually graduate accommodation, and providing financial aid.”