Friday, April 25, 2025
Blog Page 325

Haute Kosher: meditations on chicken soup

Ask a Jewish person what food they turn to when they feel down or ill or homesick or for a comforting family meal, and there’s a decent chance they’ll reply “Chicken soup,” with little hesitation.

The soup is a rich broth of chicken and often some vegetables, sometimes topped with matzah balls or “kneidlach” – dumplings made from ground-up Jewish flatbread. These can be either dense (“sinkers”), or light and fluffy (“floaters”), depending on your preference. This, like many other things, is a hotly debated topic in Jewish families. There are few things we – Jews in general and the four behind this column – love more than hearty debate and food, so the combination is irresistible.

Chicken soup is a mainstay of Shabbat meals, held on a Friday night, and many Jewish festivals. For example, it is traditional to have as the last meal before Yom Kippur, the Day of Atonement and the holiest day of the Jewish calendar, as it fills, warms, and fortifies before the 25-hour fast. At this point Leah, our resident vegetarian who naturally likes to talk about vegetarianism, would like to add that in her opinion ‘chicken soup’ as a nostalgic icon of Jewish culture need not involve chicken. Instead, flavourful vegetable soup – miso is essential for that hit of umami – with matzah balls ticks the boxes just as nicely. Chicken is not an essential ingredient; comfort and community are.

The soup is considered by Jewish mothers and grandmothers everywhere to hold great restorative power – to the extent that it is widely referred to as “Jewish penicillin”. As far back as the 12th century, the Sephardic Jewish philosopher Maimonides wrote that chicken soup had medicinal properties and could even cure leprosy and asthma. Interestingly, studies have suggested that the amino acids released from chicken when cooked may be useful in fighting infections and reducing inflammation – so perhaps Jewish mothers do know best after all, though please don’t tell ours that. 

We may take some of Maimonides’ claims with the pinch of salt stirred into our broth, but chicken soup is nonetheless a soothing balm for a troubled soul; even the smell of it simmering in the kitchen carries a certain calming power. It also has a long and noble history in Jewish culture; the venerable food writer and cultural anthropologist Claudia Roden has suggested that a version of it with egg and lemon originated from the Sephardic Jews of Spain and Portugal. They reportedly brought it to Greece after fleeing the Spanish Inquisition. 

Closer to home, Jews and their chicken soup seem to have been around in Oxford for a long time. In medieval Oxford, despite Jews being forbidden from attending the University, there was a thriving Jewish population up until  all the Jews of England were expelled by King Edward I in 1290. The medieval Jewish community in Oxford had such a significant presence that St Aldate’s actually used to be called Great Jewry Street. Archaeologists who performed a dig on the site of the old Jewish quarter in Oxford in 2016 found evidence from the rubbish tips and latrines that these Jews strictly observed kashrut, or kosher, and out of the 171 animal bones found on the site, 136 were from poultry. So, there is a good chance that Jews were eating chicken soup in Oxford nearly 1000 years ago. 

Therefore, throughout history and to this day chicken soup has served as the rich, steaming, fragrant glue that binds Jewish communities together. It is served at JSoc and Chabad meals across the world, and has its place on thousands of Shabbat tables every Friday night. Making and eating chicken soup is for many a comforting routine, even a ritual, which can alleviate homesickness for Jewish students when they move away to university. The experience of walking into a JSoc Friday Night Dinner is something which can almost feel magical; there are a hundred people in the room, all joined together to form a community, with each bowl of soup feeling like home.

For Jews who have a non-Jewish parent, this chicken soup is often one of the essential, simple recipes taught by the Jewish side of the family to the non-Jewish side. Therefore, it can have even more meaning as a symbol of the cultural sharing involved in an interfaith identity. Recipes for the soup are often handed down within families, and everyone will tell you that their grandmother’s version really is the best. This is because each family’s recipe is distinct, infused with treasured memories, traces of stories, little additions and secret ingredients passed down from great grandparents we never knew. Tamzin remembers her mother teaching her how to make it for the first time, how it is often left simmering overnight, how each week her pride and joy would be the weight and density of her kneidlach. These memories and moments are sacred.

During the pandemic, some of us have come to measure out our lives in Friday night dinners and matzah balls. Every Friday, the house is once again filled with the warmth and the aromas of challah and chicken soup, as we are seated around a dinner table with the people we have been stuck with for over a year. Surrounded by the people that we love, chicken soup sits at the heart of the little sanctuary in the week that Friday night dinner represents.

The chicken soup tradition encapsulates Jewishness at its best; it is inviting, full of love, infused with rich history. Ultimately, whichever recipe is used, precise ingredients and proportions are mere pedantry; the important thing is that chicken soup is warm and delicious and eaten in the company of others and their conversation. We hope that this column can be your metaphorical chicken soup. We hope that it can be a source of visible community for our fellow Jewish students, and something which our non-Jewish friends also enjoy and benefit from. We may have disagreements over the density of our matzah balls, but when we tuck into our soup with mutual sighs of appreciation, we are united far more than divided. L’chaim to that.

Image credit: Sailko.

Jesus College announces Michael Sheen Bursary for Welsh students

0

Jesus College has announced a new bursary scheme that will provide financial support for Welsh students. The bursary has been developed with actor and activist Michael Sheen, who is also financially supporting the bursary. The college has said that the bursary will be “based primarily on household income criteria”. It is described as an attempt to overcome the barrier of economic inequality faced by many Welsh students.

The college is already engaged in access activities for Welsh students. Together with St Catherine’s College and New College, Jesus College takes part in Oxford Cymru, a consortium that seeks to improve university accessibility for Welsh students and works with the Welsh Government. Jesus College also offers the Seren Summer School which is open to Welsh school pupils. As a result of these outreach efforts, the college has found “a 55% increase in admissions from 2016-2020” of Welsh students.

Jesus College Principal, Professor Sir Nigel Shadbolt, believes “the Michael Sheen Bursary will drive this work forward and demonstrates a continued commitment to providing access and equity for all. We are hugely grateful to Michael for this generous support, which will positively impact the lives and futures of some of our more disadvantaged Welsh students.”    

Michael Sheen said: “it gives me great pleasure to use what resources I have to help young Welsh students of real potential get the opportunities for learning there that they deserve as much as anyone else.”

“I hope that these bursaries not only make it possible for Welsh students to take advantage of the educational possibilities at Jesus but also help to encourage a sense of what is possible for young Welsh people generally.”

Will Rumble, Jesus College JCR’s Access Representative, told Cherwell: “The Michael Sheen Bursary will provide much-needed support to Welsh students at Jesus. It will decrease the financial burden faced by far too many Welsh students at Oxford and will complement the wide range of access work organised by Jesus for Welsh secondary school students. The bursary will allow Welsh students to enjoy their student experience with fewer financial concerns than currently possible.”

Applications for the first Michael Sheen bursaries will open in Michaelmas term 2021.

Image Credit: Simon Q / CC BY-NC 2.0

20/4/21, 18:34 – Updated to include JCR comment. 

OCJC report claims that the University’s ties to fossil fuel companies aid industry greenwashing

0

The Oxford Climate Justice Campaign has released a report outlining the University of Oxford’s links to the fossil fuel industry, arguing that “Oxford must make a concerted effort to square its financial connections with its ambitious sustainability goals.” The report found that between 2015-2020, at least £8.2M in research grants from fossil fuel companies were accepted by the University and associated departments and colleges, and £3.7M in donations, excluding the £100M donation from INEOS in 2020. The Saïd Business School is the biggest specified recipient of such funding and donations.

The report argues that students do not want this level of engagement with the fossil fuels industry, and suggests that “money from fossil fuel companies arguably influences the direction of research carried out, which limits academic freedom.” The report goes on to highlight departments and projects receiving the funding, including the Mathematics department’s training for Industrially Focused Mathematical Modelling, the Shell Geoscience Laboratory, and the Centre for Doctoral Training in Autonomous Intelligent Machines and Systems amongst others. 

The report suggests that the University’s relationship with the fossil fuel industry aids industry greenwashing. “By funding work on the science and technology of sustainability and other positive ethical projects at Oxford, the fossil fuel industry acquires a coat of greenwash.” The report also suggests that “By paying for prestigious events, sponsoring scholarships and achievement prizes, engaging in the cultural life of the University, and funding academic projects in the field of sustainable development and other ethical research, the fossil fuel industry builds up an image of itself as a beneficial, philanthropic, and necessary sector – an image which it can paste over the horrific scenes of damage and destitution.”

The OCJC has set up a petition asking the University to take no further donations or grants from the fossil fuels sector, and for the Careers Service to stop advertising positions within the fossil fuels industry. The petition also outlines long-term demands, including prohibiting individuals “from holding positions of authority simultaneously at the University or colleges and in a fossil fuel company, where there is a demonstrable conflict of interest” and ensuring that all colleges and halls fully divest from fossil fuel companies.

A spokesperson for OCJC said: “‘The fossil fuel industry perpetuates the climate crisis and upholds global injustice. It contributes to the death and destitution of people worldwide, particularly the marginalised and disenfranchised. The University of Oxford must cut all its ties to this extractive industry.”

“We acknowledge that cutting ties with the fossil fuel industry will require great effort. This makes it all the more important to start this process as soon as possible. We will not stop campaigning until the University of Oxford stands free from these ties.”

A spokesperson for the University said: “The University of Oxford safeguards the independence of its teaching and research programmes, regardless of the nature of their funding. Those donating money or sponsoring programmes at the University have no influence over how academics carry out their research or what conclusions they reach. Researchers publish the results of their work whether the results are seen to be critical or favourable by industry or governments.”

“Partnerships with industry allow the University to apply its knowledge to real challenges of pressing global concern, with funding often going directly into research into climate-related issues and renewables.”

Image Credit: Marcin Jozwiak via Unsplash

28/4/21, 16:37 – amended to remove references to colleges who have since been removed from the report.

Tingewick launch raffle to fund Oxford Hospitals charity and Calon Hearts charity

0

Tingewick, a charity group run by Oxford University medical students, has created a virtual “Oxford Unlocked” charity raffle, with over 70 prizes on offer. The prizes are collectively worth over £2000 and each ticket costs £2. All funds raised will be donated to Oxford Hospitals Charity and Calon Hearts charity, which are the charities Tingewick has chosen to support this year. Winners will be announced on the 17th May. 

The society hosts a range of fundraising events across the calendar year, which lead up to an annual Christmas pantomime performed in front of hospital patients. Prizes included in the latest raffle hopes to promote local businesses, with prizes including a bag of coffee beans from The Missing Bean and Jericho Coffee Traders, a pair of tickets for an event at The Bullingdon and an £849 touring bike donated by Cycloanalysts. 

The charities chosen by Tingewick, Oxford Hospitals Charity and Calon Hearts, are also particularly close to the Oxford community. Oxford hospitals Charity supports NHS staff in Oxford working on the pandemic frontline through funding extra psychological support. The charity also funds specialist equipment for patients. Calon Hearts is a charity chosen in memory of Issie Mogg, a “much-loved and greatly missed friend and medical student of Oxford University” who passed away of an undiagnosed heart condition in 2018. Calon Hearts is a charity which works to tackle heart disease in Wales by placing defibrillators in communities and delivering the training of CPR and defibrillation as well. 

Meirian Evans, Producer of the society and 4th-year medical student, said: “As medical students, supporting our hospitals however we can is always incredibly important to us, and in the current climate it is more important than ever, that’s why we’ve chosen to fundraise for Oxford Hospitals Charity this year. We’re supporting Calon Hearts, to improve defibrillator access across Wales; this is hugely personal to all of us, and we hope that our fundraising efforts this year will be a fitting tribute to our friend Issie.”

A link to the raffle can be found here

Image courtesy of Tingewick. 

How to register to vote in the local elections before the 19th April deadline

0

Which elections are taking place on the 6th of May?

On the 6th of May, local elections will be taking place across the UK. In Oxford, you can cast your vote for the Oxford City Council, for Oxfordshire County Council, and for the Police and Crime Commissioner for Thames Valley.

Why does it matter?

Voter turnout is often lower amongst young people, but issues in local elections also affect young people. Oxford City Council can regulate housing policy and prices, make decisions regarding parks and leisure facilities, and take environmental action.

How do I register?

You can register online in under 5 minutes. The deadline for registration is Monday 19 April. 

Can I vote in elections at home and in Oxford?

If you live at a different UK address during the holidays than during term, you are allowed to vote in elections in both council areas, as long as you are registered at both. This rule applies only to local elections, and not to national ones. 

I won’t be in Oxford on May 6th. How can I vote?

You can apply for a postal vote, and have the voting papers sent to a different address to that of your Oxford residence. The deadline for applying for postal vote is 19 April. 

You can also apply for a proxy vote, allowing someone else to vote on your behalf. The deadline for applying for proxy votes is 29 April 27.

I’m not a UK citizen. Can I vote in these elections?

If you are a qualifying Commonwealth, Irish or EU citizen you are also eligible to vote, given you are not excluded from voting for legal reasons.

I don’t have a national insurance number. What do I do?

You will be asked for your national insurance number for registration. If you can’t remember it, you can look at past payslips or fill out a form requesting it. Alternatively, you can also register without entering a national insurance number. In this case, you will be sent an email asking to provide alternative documentation, such as a picture of a passport, ID card or residence permit.

Photo by Element5 Digital on Unsplash

In Conversation with Dick and Dom

0

When our Zoom call connects, Dom has his arm wrapped around the back of Dick’s chair. The pair are sitting in a normal-looking front room with muted green walls, dark wood furniture and a healthy plant in the far-left corner. A metaphor for a pair of grown-up kids finally grown up? Maybe not. In the middle of the room there is a giant DJ mixer covered in flashing LEDs set up in the space where the sofa should be.

‘We have an online gig tonight,’ Dick tells me.

 ‘We’ve been trying to get really good at DJing,’ adds Dom, ‘just practicing and practicing and practicing so that we can broaden our DJing not just to the student scene, but to other places too. Creamfields maybe. […] I think it surprises people that we can do this, they don’t expect us to be able to do that kind of thing, they just expect us to be able to shout BOGIES.’

 The game, like the double act, needs no introduction. Anyone who watched Saturday morning TV between 2002 and 2006 is familiar with the unparalleled joy of yelling “BOGIES” in public places to your parents’ and teacher’s dismay. Throughout our conversation, I’m half expecting one of my flat mates to barge into the room and yell it down the webcam.

I ask if they ever feel disappointed that they are only associated with BOGIES and their other Bungalow shenanigans. ‘No, not at all. We’re incredibly proud of it.’ says Dom. ‘I want to know what it feels like again. Working on Dick and Dom in da Bungalow (a phrase which they both invariably pronounce as one word ‘dickanddomindabungalow’) was this complete synergy of a group of people moving forward together. It was like an army. Everyone was in sync with each other. Everyone knew exactly what the next person would do. The sound person was in sync with the light person who was in sync with the camera person who was in sync with the director and the floor manager.’

‘And there wasn’t even a script,’ Dom continues, ‘there was just a list of bullet points and the kids were given complete free reign. Everything was off the cuff. […] And all you had to do was ask a kid “What’s wrong?” or “Why are you upset?” and all of a sudden someone would be playing sad violin music. The lens would go out of focus. The lights would suddenly go blue and you’ve got this complete shift mood compared to a second ago. And then just as quickly it would all go back to normal. It was so special, and I’ve only seen it done on a few different shows.’

Back when Dick and Dom first started at the BBC in 1996, the kid’s TV slot was 3 hours long and would receive about 5 million views every day. Nowadays, they tell me, you’re lucky if you can get 70,000. I ask them what they think has changed.

‘The rule book has got bigger,’ replies Dick, ‘you wouldn’t see a program like dickanddomindabungalow on TV anymore, which is really sad, because it was something different, anarchic and unique at the time. […] Everything nowadays is produced properly into well formatted TV shows. Kids do still have free reign to make their own content, but they’re making it on YouTube instead. It’s a shame they can’t do that on TV.’

‘Everyone worries too much these days,” adds Dom, “back then there was definitely a kind of revolution: there was Chris Moyles doing the Breakfast Show, there was TFI Friday with Chris Evans. […] Then suddenly it all clamped down. I think it was around the time of the Russell Brand and Jonathan Ross controversy, I think that was when the rule book got bigger.’

 In 2008, Russel Brand and Jonathan Ross prank called Andrew Sachs BBC Radio 2, leaving rude messages on his answerphone about Brand’s relationship with Sachs’ granddaughter. 18000 complaints were made to Ofcom and both Brand and Ross were suspended from the BBC. The affair led to a huge public debate about public service broadcasting and a much stricter set of regulations at the BBC.

 ‘Dickanddomindabungalow’ has been subject to its own fair share of critical attention. Dick and Dom received complaints that ranged from the pair’s inaccurate use of grammar to appearing near-nude on the show. Dom was once criticised by Ofcom after wearing a t-shirt with the slogan ‘Morning Wood’ and Dick received numerous complaints following a skit in which he gave birth to a dozen babies covered in creamy muck muck.

‘When we got complaints like that, we pushed it harder to try and generate some more. There were groups of mums out there who were trying to get together to get the program taken off air,’ says Dick, with a proud smile. ‘And we were the second program in the history of children’s TV to be mentioned in the House of Commons. A lot of people think the BBC took us off air, but it was our decision in the end. We felt it was best to leave while the show was at its peak.’

But in many ways, Dick and Dom have never really left the Bungalow. During our conversation, I come to realise that for them, all of history exists on a timeline that runs from ‘Before The Bungalow’ to ‘After The Bungalow’. Every story they tell me is invariably framed by its proximity to the golden era of ‘dickanddomindabungalow’. This time between 2002 and 2006 was a unique moment in history when their lives consisted entirely of baby races, musical splatues and creamy muck muck. There’s a lot to be nostalgic about.

During their early years (a time described to me as ‘4 or 5 years Before The Bungalow’), Dick and Dom worked on separate projects for the BBC and lived together in a basement flat share in London. They tell me how it was home to many (self-proclaimed) legendary parties for the TV stars of the early 2000s.

‘We used to have these big old-school vinyl decks and big speakers,’ explains Dick. ‘People used to say: “Have you ever been to a Dick and Dom party?”, because people would always end up in a right mess. Chris Moyles would be face-down over there, Alex Davis face-down over there. It was all going on. […] The landlord upstairs used to find it hilarious.’

 ‘I don’t think he found it hilarious at all,’ interrupted Dom. ‘He phoned us up once asking us to turn down the music because his pot plants were leaping all over the floor. And then we had the audacity to ask him to stop his kids running around at seven o’clock in the morning.’

 Eyes wide and leaning forward in their chairs, Dick and Dom launch into story after story about their memories of what can only be described as their own real-life bungalow. ‘We used to just go into the kitchen, a bit drunk, and just start having food fights, completely trashing the kitchen,’ says Dick. Without missing a beat or seemingly noticing that it was his other half who had spoken, Dom continues: ‘And when I say food fights, I mean proper food fights. […] Literally every single thing that you could find in the cupboard. I’m talking eggs on the ceiling…boxes of eggs…flour everywhere…ketchup. It was an absolute tip.’

 ‘But we’ve grown up now. The party days are over,’ says Dom, somewhat unconvincingly considering their evening plans consisted of a D&B gig for Sunderland and Nottingham Trent universities.

‘The TV relationship is all based on our real-life friendship,’ explains Dick. ‘It’s no more than that. And I think the fact that we’re still best mates after 25 years is a testimony that you can’t forge onscreen relationships. We know many double acts who have tried to stay friends just to keep the career going – but it ultimately falls apart. We’ve been through our own personal problems over the 25 years, it’s impossible not to have ups and downs, but we’ve always been there to support each other. And we’ve gone through our lives together, not just our careers together. It’s been a great 25 years. And we’ve got many more ahead.’

 I ask them what fans should be expecting next from Dick and Dom. ‘We have ideas,’ replies Dick, ‘it’s been a bit bad over the last year, you know, a bit different. Last March we were booked up to do loads and loads of stuff. Our podcast Cash for Chaos was going to be made as a TV pilot, but all that stopped and everything in our diaries was cleared out; all the festivals, all the live tours, everything. It’s been weird transitioning into this online area. We’ve been coming up with as many ideas as we can for when everything reopens to come back with a bang. Because I think everyone’s going to be ready to party.’

After we hang up the call, I’m left feeling nostalgic for the world that they described, a world full of food fights, house parties and Saturday morning TV. But my overriding impression of Dick and Dom is not their sentimentality or even their devoted friendship, it is the total seriousness with which they speak about their career. Although I would still be hesitant to accuse the pair of behaving like full-blown grown-ups, their knowledge of TV broadcasting is insightful, and they speak about the last 25 years of pop culture with profound clarity. DJing and podcasting are not clumsy side hustles for Dick and Dom, they are deliberate strategies to recapture an ageing fanbase; because Dick and Dom have never really given up on their mission to bring happiness to a generation of kids who, somewhere along the line, turned into adults. 

Protestors gather in support of traveller communities in Oxford city centre

0

A protest was held in Oxford City Centre on International Romani Day, on the 8th of April, to highlight the impact of the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill on Traveller communities. Organised by the group Oxford Stand Up to Racism, the protest took place in Bonn Square, opposite Westgate shopping centre.

The group claims that “The new bill will make trespass a criminal offence, and give police new powers to seize Gypsy, Roma, and Traveller homes and possessions. Courts will have new powers to impose fines and imprisonment for trespass when there are not enough sites provided for people to stop legally.”

Julie Simmons, a spokesperson for Oxford Stand Up to Racism said to Cherwell: “Thursday 8th April was International Romani Day and Stand Up To Racism was organising events around the country to draw attention to the challenges and discrimination Roma, Gypsy and Traveller communities face, and how this will be worsened by the proposed Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill. The measures outlined in the PCSCB will further compound the inequalities experienced by Gypsies, Roma and Travellers, needlessly pushing people into the criminal justice system.”

“The bill will make it nearly impossible for families without a site to live on to, for example, keep their places at school or to attend medical appointments. Already Gypsy, Roma, and Traveller communities have life expectancies between 10 and 25 years shorter than the general population. This bill will further exacerbate the inequalities.”

“An enforcement approach to addressing the number of unauthorised encampments overlooks the issue of the lack of site provision – there is an absence of places where Gypsies, Roma, and Travellers are permitted to stop or reside. There are other solutions to managing unauthorised encampments, such as negotiated stopping, whereby arrangements are made on agreed permitted times on stopping and to ensure the provision of basic amenities such as water, sanitation and refuse collection.”

“The definition of a Gypsy or Traveller in planning terms requires proof of travelling – without that people are not assessed as needing a pitch or get planning permission, but will essentially be prohibited from travelling by the new law – effectively outlawing a centuries old way of life.”

“Stand Up To Racism, along with many other organisations, believe the government is stoking racism and people’s ability to protest against this with the PCSCB, and this is why we are supporting the next national day of action on April 17th against the bill by joining other groups to protest in Bonn Square at 2 PM.”

During the second reading of the bill in Parliament, several Conservative MPs defended the bill’s measures against Traveller communities. Sir Paul Beresford, the MP for Mole Valley, said at the debate on the 16th March:

“My constituency has a number of legitimate Traveller sites. The relationship between the settled communities and the so-called Travellers on official sites is generally harmonious. Surrey County Council and Surrey District and Borough Councils are in the process of setting up a transit site, with facilities, for Travellers. All this is very different from the frequent illegal Traveller invasions. Surrey has had hundreds of these incidents, and my constituency has more than its fair share. Over recent years, the numbers of these illegal land-squatting camps have increased.”

“If access is inhibited by barriers, gates or any form of obstruction, they are broken down or removed, and generally damaged. The Travellers then squat on-site regardless of the ownership, be it common land, parkland, farmland, private land or even a school playground. I note that a number of Members are opposed to change and would prefer that this remained a civil matter. That approach has been an absolute, abysmal failure, with considerable financial loss to the local community or landowners. The legislative change criminalising this type of illegal camping is exceptionally welcome and has been long awaited. It is for the protection of local people – my constituents.”

Christian Wakeford, the conservative MP for Bury South also spoke at the same debate: “Traveller encampments, especially the unauthorised ones, cause distress to residents such as those on Kingston Road in Radcliffe in my constituency, who often thought that the encampment had more rights than they did. They saw extreme antisocial behaviour such as their fences being used as a toilet or being stolen for fires, and they actually feared for themselves. I went and met them several times during the summer, because there was not just one encampment; there were two. It is about time we supported our residents and said that we are not against Travellers, we are just against unauthorised Traveller encampments.”

Image Credit: ceridwen / Bonn Square and war memorial / CC BY-SA 2.0

Music for springtime

0

‘CITY GIRL POEM’ – Twilight Prince, Nicholas Britell

Upcoming artist, Twilight Prince, samples his poetry to the backdrop of Nicholas Britell’s score to ‘If Beale Street Could Talk’. His poetry, which centres around empowerment and spirituality, is a breath of fresh air in an increasingly chaotic world. Twilight Prince gives us a sense of well-needed perspective on the world that is: “larger than the last meal you ate/ better, it’s never up for a debate”. ‘CITY GIRL POEM’ suits mindful moments and brings two minutes of peace.

‘The Hardest Part’ – Olivia Dean

For some, lockdown has been a period of introspection and growth, a feeling captured by Olivia Dean. She encapsulates a development to emotional independence in her mellow tune, with loss portrayed as natural rather than worthy of grief. The pared-down introduction and first verse may seem melancholic, yet an emotional shift is captured in the progression from mellow verse to bouncy chorus. Although minimalist in its instrumentation, Dean’s tone conveys a feeling of self-worth we should all strive for and makes her album highly anticipated.

‘Golden Slumbers’ – The Beatles

Lennon-McCartney’s synthesis of lullaby and rock ideas in ‘Golden Slumbers’ is the consolation we need right now. Isolated vocals in the song’s opening line “once there was a way to get back home” present a relevant sense of emotional vulnerability experienced by many this winter. The song immediately changes tone when we hear Ringo Starr’s drum fill and provides the antithesis to the previously peaceful lullaby which eventually returns. Lennon-McCartney contrast feelings of consolation and pain in a structural synthesis enabling the song to become a powerful emotional outlet. Reflecting rapid emotional change, which many can relate to during lockdown.

‘Moment in the Sun’ – Sunflower Bean

This song exudes summer nostalgia and excitement for the coming season through its happy-go-lucky feel, playful guitar riff and repetitive carefree phrases. For now, though, it is perfect for days that surpass ten degrees as it sparks inspiration and hope for months after lockdown.

‘Levitating’ – Dua Lipa, ft. DaBaby

Start your day off with this dance track and you can’t go wrong. Though Future Nostalgia was released a year ago, Dua Lipa’s hits are incapable of ageing. Her repeated, powerful introduction to the chorus charges energy throughout melodically simple, yet incredibly catchy refrains. The breakdown, in which vocals are isolated then burst into another chorus, channels excitement for the hotly anticipated summer club scene.

‘SUPERBLOOM’ – MisterWives

The triumphant title track of MisterWives’ 2020 album has an unstoppable sense of confidence. It celebrates overcoming obstacles and can be applied to feeling that we: “deserve congratulations ‘cause [we] came out the other side” of a winter lockdown. 

It builds from mellow vocals and jazz piano accompaniment to powerful chords in playful variations of texture. The song reaches a polyphonic climax between vocals, chorus and saxophone in the final chorus which conquers self-doubt and leaves nothing but positivity.

Listen to the playlist on Spotify @cherwellmusic.

Image credit: Tim Hill from Pixabay 

Vaccine Distribution: EU vs UK

Back in April 2020, the number of COVID-19 deaths in the UK reached over 350 people per million – about twice as high as those in the EU. Media outlets in the UK and US quickly came to present the EU, and in particular Germany, as an example to follow in the crisis. The Guardian wrote ‘UK must learn from German response to COVID-19’, while The New York Times asked A German Exception?

One year later, the roles have switched. As the main priority becomes an efficient and rapid vaccination campaign, the EU is falling behind. While the UK and the US have administered over 57 COVID-19 vaccine doses per 100 people, the EU states have administered an average of just 20 per 100. The EU dilemma can be understood as two separate problems; a lack of vaccine doses, and a failure to administer acquired doses.

covid-vaccination-doses-per-capita-1

With decision processes in the complex European Union requiring more deliberation than for an individual member state, it took the members of the EU’s executive until June to decide upon the $3.2 billion joint pot for vaccine purchases. The first deal with pharmaceutical company AstraZeneca was signed in August – months after the UK and the US. Antonio Guterres, Secretary General of the UN, has criticised this competitive “vaccine nationalism”, calling instead for more international solidarity.

Deciding on collective budgets seems also to have lead to more frugal outcomes; the US vaccine program had a $10 billion budget, while the UK is estimated to have spent around $12 billion. This may have made bargaining simpler; Benjamin Natanyahu speculated that part of Israel’s success lay in the fact that they “didn’t quibble about [prices]” – the country has now administered over 118 doses per 100 people. When making these comparisons, it must be remembered that many member states spend substantial amounts on vaccination campaigns outside of the EU budget.

It also took the European Medical Association (EMA) longer to approve vaccines. It was three weeks behind the UK in approving the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine and took a month longer to approve the AstraZeneca vaccine – by far the cheapest out of all vaccines available. Some countries decided to go their own way, provoking internal conflicts. Hungary authorised both the Russian vaccine Sputnik, as well as the Chinese Sinopharm

In many EU states, the AstraZeneca vaccine suffered from an inferior reputation as soon as it was released for use. Multiple countries authorised it only for the under 65 year-olds, following concerns about lack of trial data for older age groups. This led to scepticism about the vaccine’s efficacy. In Germany, thousands of people did not turn up to appointments if they knew they were going to receive an AstraZeneca jab. Local authorities also hesitated to use the vaccine, and many doses remained unused.

To make matters worse, multiple member states temporarily suspended the AstraZeneca vaccine over concerns surrounding blood-clotting. The EMA responded by reasserting the vaccine’s safety, but public trust in the vaccine remained further tarnished. According to a poll by the Elabe Institute, only one in five French people trusted the vaccine, while almost three quarters of Germans said they would let themselves get vaccinated with it, according to a study conducted by Forsa. On the Italian island of Sicily, up to 80% of people offered the AstraZeneca vaccine refused it due to safety concerns.

The New York Times suggests that strict adhesiveness to vaccination campaign plans may also have had a detrimental effect. Most nation states prioritised clinically vulnerable groups, meaning that high age groups were to be vaccinated first. In combination with the effect of the non-authorisation of the AstraZeneca vaccine for the 65 and overs, this led to vaccination delays. 

Additionally, EU member states were more reluctant to adopt the British strategy of extending the interval between jabs. This measure was taken to increase the proportion of at-risk-people having received the first jab. In the EU, a higher relative proportion has received the full dose, but a lower total amount.

Finally, organisational complications and inflexibility may also be at fault. In Germany, multiple elderly people struggled to sign up for the vaccine. Initially, this required not only an email address, but an email address per person, which many lacked. Unlike in the UK, there have been vastly fewer reports of surplus vaccines being administered to young people once priority groups have been vaccinated.

BREAKING: University releases new guidance for returns

The University has sent out updated guidance to its students in light of the announcement that students on non-practical courses that were not already exempt will be unable to return to teaching until the 17th of May. Students have been asked to remain at their term-time address if they return to Oxford unless they have a legal reason to do so, in line with government guidance. This comes after PresCom has asked the Conference of Colleges to consider implementing a standardised self-certification policy under which students would be able to self-certify for returns.

Students studying non-practical courses may be able to return if it is “necessary to support the continuation of [their] studies”, including preparing for in-person examinations. Students may also be able to return if they lack access to appropriate study facilities at home, or need to return for safety reasons – including wellbeing and mental health. The updated guidance says that students can request to return “even if [they] have previously applied and were not given permission”. The University has also highlighted that “if you do return to Oxford, current government guidance then requires you to stay at your term-time address throughout the term unless you have a legally permitted reason to leave.”

Exams that are already planned to go forward in-person will be going ahead, and the University has highlighted that for students with these exams, “preparing to take part in-person assessments is a valid reason for returning to Oxford.” Over 30 exams are planned to take place in-person in Trinity, although 15 of these remain subject to confirmation in light of updated government guidance.

The suspension of the residency requirement for Trinity means that international students who choose not to return to Oxford may continue to study in the remote. This advice applies in particular to students from ‘red list’ countries, and the University and colleges will not “routinely meet the costs” of PCR tests and quarantine costs, which currently stands at £1,750. Students on the red list have been advised “to take advantage of the residency exemption, unless you have substantial in-person teaching commitments.”

Oxford SU have also released their response to the announcement, stating that they are “continuing to call on all colleges to allow students to ‘self-certify’ and return to Oxford if exemptions apply to them.” The updated statement also condemned the government, stating that “We recognise that students have made considerable sacrifices this year and we are extremely disappointed the Government have decided to leave students in these uncertain conditions when their final exams are rapidly approaching.” The SU went on to call on the collegiate University “to fill this vacuum of leadership,” as well as highlighting the work of JCR presidents in lobbying for students. 

The SU went on to outline their response to the University’s updated policies, stating “We are pleased that students will be able to request to return even if you have previously applied and were not given permission. We hope that in reviewing these applications, colleges will view students through a lens of compassion and empathy, as we believe that too many students fell through the cracks last term.” Colleges are expected to release their own updated policies and communication over the “next few days” if they have not do so already.

16/4/21, 10:28 – updated to include the SU’s statement. 

Image Credit: Yoonsuh Park via Unsplash