Sunday 6th July 2025
Blog Page 469

Freshers, Friends, and Feuds: The Instagram world of Oxford offer holders

0

There’s a new Instagram account making waves: @OxfordUniFreshers2020. The account posts submissions from Oxford offer holders, so incoming freshers can introduce themselves and get to know each other.

The page’s first post was only published a week ago, and since then has featured an impressive 315 profiles of offer holders from many different colleges and courses. The account already has over 2000 followers and has an impressive feud going with Cambridge. 

Speaking to Cherwell anonymously, the account admin explained why they set the account up: “There were a lot of other fresher accounts and groups for other universities, and I thought it would be a really good idea to provide a platform for people going to Oxford to get to know each other before term started – to make it a little easier to make friends and also to give people something to do.

“A lot of people have messaged me and said that it’s made the whole process a lot less daunting for them because they’ve been able to form connections with other people on their courses or just people whose interests they share.”

Despite the wholesomeness of the page, it is no surprise that Cambridge has been attempting (unsuccessfully) to outdo the Oxford page. The two accounts have had competitions to see who could become popular.

The Cambridge account (@CambridgeUniversity2020) spoke to Cherwell, commenting that the two accounts had “had quite a bit of rivalry since our accounts started, mainly the race to 1k followers which we won with the help of PaigeY [A Cambridge Youtuber].” There was previously a competition to reach 500 followers, which Oxford also sadly lost.

Oxford’s forfeit for not hitting 1000 followers first was to post this TikTok on their account.

However, Oxford has since performed better, beating Cambridge to 2000 followers. When asked for comment on the Oxford account’s superiority over the Cambridge page, the Oxford admin asserted: “All you Cambridge freshers must be rethinking your choices now – even with PaigeY helping you, we have come out on top.”

After this, the Cambridge account admin commented that “our competitions have been quite amicable” and that they had nothing but respect for Oxford. Overall, the rivalry is friendly, with both accounts helping to promote the Oxbridge Varsity trip.

Speaking to Cherwell, many Oxford freshers have found the account a really positive and humanising first experience of their university careers.

Verney, who has an offer to study French and Linguistics at Worcester, told Cherwell: “Before I started genuinely considering applying to Oxford,  I never thought of its students as being a student in the same way that I am – I always thought they were so much better and smarter than me. Accounts like the freshers page do a great job of showing that we’re all just people who love our subjects.”

Paul, who has an offer to study Fine Art at Magdalen, said: “The freshers’ account was really nice… it’s a lovely ice breaker if you had any fears and worries about meeting new people.”

Charlotte, who has an offer to study French at Oriel added: “I was definitely struck by how down-to-earth people seemed on the page. There’s certainly a stereotype that I’ve heard people talk about a lot, but it was comforting to me to see such a variety of people and interests.”

Sofie summed up: “I sometimes feel like it is easy to picture Oxford as this highly intellectual and intimidating institution, so it’s quite relieving having the opportunity to meet people beforehand and realise that everyone is in the same boat.”

Cherwell wishes the offer-holders all the best for results day, and hopes to see them in Oxford in October.

Comfort Films: How to Train Your Dragon

I was not expecting to be on a plane, flying back to Australia. Libraries closed, online teaching, “unprecedented times” (etc. etc. etc.) — I sank back into my seat, flicked on the little airplane screen in front of me… and proceeded to watch all three How to Train Your Dragon films, back-to-back. I drifted into a world of comic, Viking dragon riders; of bold music scores; of right and wrong. I couldn’t look away. What a strange thing? I almost laugh thinking back on it: what a strange thing to be tethered and grounded by watching a kids’ movie about flying, while in the air? What a strange thing, that as I flicked through all the new releases and serious arthouse films I’d been meaning-to-see-for-a-while, and all the golden-age-classics-I’m-sure-I’ll-get-to-some-day, that it was the familiar comfort of kids’ films that drew me in and provided a welcome distraction.

Maybe it is because How to Train Your Dragon is about a society under pressure, one which has to change its behaviour? The village of Berk is in a violent struggle with the dragons, suffering perpetual attacks that damage houses, threaten lives, and kill livestock. The luckless protagonist, Hiccup, builds a contraption which wounds a dangerous and elusive dragon — but instead of killing it, he turns to compassion. As a result, he learns about the dragons on their own terms, taking off the mask of the monster in the process. In doing so, he triggers a transformative change in Berk, which results in dragons and humans co-habiting in a peaceful, mutually beneficial way. In these times of societal transformation, it offers a bold and generous method for centering compassion and understanding in social restructure. 

But, midway through my analysis, I realised that my using How to Train Your Dragon to perform a socio-cultural critique on Covid-19 was an attempt to justify my viewing selection. If I’m being honest though, if I’m going to rush headlong at the truth rather than sidling towards it with an analysis, the real reason I wanted to watch How to Train Your Dragon was because it was nice, warm, and comforting. The best type of children’s media has that inner flame, a burnished optimism, which can remind audiences of every age of the fervent joy that comes from stories that are powered by humane goodness.

The children’s author and All Souls fellow Katherine Rundell, released a short essay last year titled Why You Should Read Children’s Books, Even Though You Are So Old and Wise. Rundell lays out a case for the consumption of children’s media by those of all ages with deft scholarship and joyous passion. For her, the best children’s fiction “helps us refind things we may not even know we have lost”. The past rushes up to meet us, reminding us of a time when “new discoveries came daily and when the world was colossal, before the imagination was trimmed and neatened…”

Anecdotally, many a zoom call with friends now scattered around the world reveals that quite a lot of us are turning back to our childhood joys in these times. A friend in London has re-read all of the How To Train Your Dragon books (‘it’s great cause you can read one a day, they’re so short — it’s just the right size to feel like you’ve achieved something!’); two friends, one in Sydney and one in Wales, are slowly watching all the Studio Ghibli films, and listening to a podcast about them as they go; and since my hazy jet-lagged jump into the How To Train movies, I have been reading Terry Pratchett. 

Regarding the joys of refinding, to borrow Rundell’s term, I particularly relish the feeling that I am doing something that is purely about enjoyment. It is far harder to tangle kids’ media into the nexus of self-improvement that has been stretching across social media feeds. It discharges the pressure of using this time to get fit, learn languages, read Infinite Jest or whatever else. One of the powers of children’s films at this time is that they are not pitched at the level of extending self-improvement or artistic challenge, but instead, are capaciously centred around entertainment — and around the unfashionable poles of good and evil, with the former triumphing over the latter. 

These unfashionable poles may not hold between them the complexity and insight that many of us yearn for, but they are a good place to strike out from. Perhaps they even, as Rundell would imply, offer a chance for recalibration. We can pull out our moral compass and point it at the simple childhood poles of good and bad, and test where we are now. We can triangulate ourselves in the more complex mire of adulthood by peering at the stars and the lodestone of our youth; by being reminded of a time when we held an innate belief that the rules of the fables and stories were true, and that we’d make it through any hardship if we held onto love, friendship, and hope.

Oxford renters face eviction crisis

0

Renters in Oxford are facing growing uncertainty with the end of the government’s three-month eviction ban.

Many renters, especially those on furlough or Universal Credit payments, may be faced with significant financial difficulties as a result of the ban ending.

The ban, which also applies to buy-to-let landlords, has so far protected those who have lost income as a result of the pandemic. However, with many renters already spending more than 50% of their income on rent, there are fears that there will be an eviction crisis once this period comes to an end.

This mirrors the national picture, where according to YouGov 2 million renters may be unable to pay rent as a result of a loss of income from the pandemic. Oxford may prove to be at the forefront of this national crisis, owing to the proportion of income Oxford residents spend on rent.

ACORN Oxford, a member-led campaigning organisation working to help renters, said: “Without a rent waiver, thousands of tenants who have lost income during this crisis will be facing mounting debt and the threat of eviction once the temporary ban is lifted.

“People are already having to choose between buying food and paying rent. No one should have to worry about losing the roof over their head during a pandemic. We need to come together in our communities to defend renters, while we call for the government to take urgent action.”

The Oxford Tenant’s Union, a group focusing on helping renters in Oxford, said: “The eviction ban the government has put in place does not go nearly far enough. Renters will still be going into rent arrears with reduced incomes and at the end of the eviction ban we will undoubtedly be facing a massive homelessness and eviction crisis.

“Official recommendation has been made by the New Economics Foundation (an independent think tank) calling for a suspension of all rent payments as a very achievable solution to support renters. The government also needs to follow through on their promise to bring an immediate and permanent suspension to Section 21 of the Housing Act.”

They commented on the Government’s current policy: “The Government advice for landlords to show compassion is not a proper policy that can be relied upon where so many landlords will not negotiate with tenants.

“We are still seeing lots of aggressive behaviour from landlords, including NHS staff lodgers being evicted by their landlord. We need real protection for renters to stop a huge rise in homelessness and stop the most vulnerable going into debt.

“We’re hearing from renters, including many students, whose landlords are refusing to offer any sort of rent reduction even though they’ve asked; students who are being forced to pay the entirety of their contract even though they can’t physcally get back here or their housemates have left because of COVID-19; and shared houses where landlords or lettings agencies are still having strangers visit the house for viewings

Oxford Mutual Aid, a grassroots community support group which provides support to the Oxford community, also told Cherwell: “Until now, everyone has mostly been focusing on the progress of the pandemic and the effects of the lockdown. That’s understandable, but we all need to be preparing for the economic repercussions. Housing precarity was already a huge issue before Covid-19, and there are a lot of people in Oxford who are going to need help.”

MP for Oxford East, Anneliese Dodds, told Cherwell: “Current protections for renters are inadequate. While the government have introduced some temporary measures, like pausing evictions temporarily and heeding Labour’s call to raise Local Housing Allowance, these do not go far enough.

“While in the long term we need to fix the housing crisis, Labour have called on the government to introduce an emergency package of measures to help renters now. Here in Oxford, the City Council are also providing practical help to those evicted from their homes, and I also encourage constituents to contact my office if they need assistance.”

Image credit to Roger Kidd / geograph.co.uk

Six Oxford professors elected as Fellows to Academy of Medical Sciences

0

Six Oxford professors have recently been awarded Fellowships by the Academy of Medical Sciences, an independent body which represents the diversity of medical sciences in the UK.

The researchers honoured by the Fellowships include Professor David Bennett, Professor Peter Brown, Professor Ervin Fodor, Professor Peter Friend, Professor Cornelia van Duijin and Professor Matthew Wood. All six were elected amongst fifty other leading biomedical and health scientists.

The Academy of Medical Sciences works to secure a future in which both UK and global health is improved by the best research, and describe their mission as translating this research into ‘benefits for society’. They also strive to ensure that the UK leads global research into biomedical and health science.

Professor Sir Robert Lechler PMedSci, President of the Academy of Medical Sciences, said in a statement upon the announcement of the new Fellowships: “I am delighted to welcome these 50 new Fellows into the Academy’s Fellowship. Each one has made their own outstanding contribution to biomedical science, and together they are advancing the health of our society in the UK and internationally. Their work affects us all, from the way we keep healthy through our lifestyle, to how we are treated if we become ill, to the way we receive information about health.”

Professor Sir Lechler pointed to the importance of the work of the elected Fellows during the current crisis in his statement to the Academy, saying: “never has there been a more important time to recognise and celebrate the people behind ground-breaking biomedical and health research, working harder than ever to further knowledge and protect patients and the public.

“It brings me great pleasure to congratulate the new Fellows, and see our Fellowship grow to even greater heights of evidence-based advice, leadership and expertise.”

The new Fellows will be formally admitted into the Academy on 25th June 2020.

Image credit to Mike Peel / Wikimedia Commons

30m doses of Oxford’s vaccine may be available in UK by September

The UK Government has announced that 30 million doses of Oxford’s coronavirus vaccine could be made available in Britain as early as September. On Monday, Business Secretary Alok Sharma announced £65.5 million of Government funding as the vaccine trials progress.

This follows a global licensing agreement between Oxford University and the pharmaceutical company AstraZeneca. The agreement covers the commercialisation and manufacturing of the vaccine, although it has not yet passed safety and efficacy tests. An additional £18.5 million of taxpayer’s money was given to Imperial College London for a second potential UK developed vaccine.

If the Oxford vaccine is successful, AstraZeneca will sell it at the cost it takes to produce, only charging royalties if the virus becomes endemic, like seasonal influenza. In all, AstraZeneca hopes to produce 100 million doses of the Oxford vaccine, with most going to other countries around the world.

Pascal Soriot, the CEO of the company, said: “AstraZeneca is at the forefront of the response to COVID-19, and we are proud to be working with Oxford University to help make this vaccine available as quickly as possible.”

Prior to the announcement, most experts had said that the earliest we should expect a vaccine would be by 12-18 months’ time. If the vaccine is proved effective, AstraZeneca plans to fast-track regulatory approval by the fourth quarter of 2020. Their aim is to build capacity so that they can produce tens of millions of doses by the end of the year.

Sir John Bell emphasised the partnership’s international outlook, stating: “We now have a partner in AstraZeneca who are ideally positioned to help us evaluate the vaccine, manufacture it and distribute it to UK citizens as well as to the rest of the world. They share our commitment to true global access to end this pandemic.”

Business Secretary Alok Sharma states: “Our scientists are at the forefront of vaccine development. This deal with AstraZeneca means that if the Oxford University vaccine works, people in the UK will get the first access to it, helping to protect thousands of lives.

“The agreement will deliver 100 million doses in total, ensuring that in addition to supporting our own people, we are able to make the vaccines available to developing countries at the lowest possible cost. The UK continues to lead the global response to find a vaccine, and the government is backing our scientists to do this as quickly as possible.”

Dr. Alexander Douglas, the leader of the research group at Oxford which has developed the manufacturing method, said: “We have been preparing for large-scale manufacturing of our vaccine candidate since February. This funding enables manufacturing to start immediately, and so will make vaccine available as soon as possible, while adhering to the most stringent safety standards. The methods developed here in the UK will also enable the production of vaccine for other countries.”

Image credit to: Tumisu/Pixabay

Oxford launches study on lockdown’s effects on young people

The University of Oxford has created a survey investigating the impact of lockdown on young people. 

The survey, called Co-SPACE (standing for COVID-19 Supporting Parents, Adolescents, and Children in Epidemics), aims to track the mental health of children and young people by inviting parents and carers to answer questions about family life during the pandemic.

The survey also has a section where 11 to 17-year olds can contribute. The first survey will take half an hour while the following surveys (currently estimated to be one per month) are expected to be shorter. The Co-SPACE study can be completed here.

Professor Cathy Creswell of the Departments of Psychiatry and Experimental Psychology said: “research has provided valuable information about how parents and carers can support their children’s mental health in general. However, at this point, we know very little about what might be most effective in the current context of COVID-19.

“We hope to have more than 10,000 parents and carers across the UK complete the new online survey. Their responses will help us really understand how families are coping and what support could make all the difference to children, young people and their families at this time”.

The research will be led by the University of Oxford and supported by the Oxford and Thames Valley NIHR Applied Research Consortium, the NIHR Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centre and the UKRI Emerging Minds Network Plus.

This has been launched at the same time as the Oxfordshire Online Mental Health and Wellbeing Survey 2020, conducted in partnership with Oxford University’s researchers. While this survey has been conducted in previous years, alterations have been made to ensure its relevance to the current situation for young people.

One of the lead researchers on the survey, Associate Professor Mina Fazel, said this study “will give us a unique opportunity to understand how young people are managing during lockdown, helping us to ensure that we are as prepared as possible to support their mental health needs now and when schools formally open again”.

However, while the Oxfordshire Online Mental Health and Wellbeing Survey aims to tailor mental health services and resources in local schools (specifically considering the impact of Covid-19), the Co-SPACE study is nationwide. Its focus is to share data with partner organisations to create effective support for children and their families.

Image Credit to: Tumisu/Pixabay

Oxford city centre sees historic air pollution drop

0

Air pollution levels in central Oxford have fallen significantly as a result of the government-imposed lockdown, and the City Council are looking at ways to sustain this change in the future.

Oxford City Council report that travel restrictions have caused levels of toxic nitrogen dioxide in the air to dip below the legal limit for the first time since records began.

Models produced by environmental consultancy Ricardo Energy and Environment show that current air pollution levels have dropped by 59% as a direct result of the lockdown. Between 2009-2019 pollution levels dropped by only 37%.

Of the 29 sites surveyed nationally, which included London, Edinburgh, and Glasgow, Oxford saw the largest decrease in air pollution.

Plans are now being discussed to maintain these levels. The City Council is exploring measures such as increasing the number of bike lanes and pedestrianising Broad Street. Nationally there has been a large increase in the number of people cycling and walking, with bike retailer Halfords reporting a 500% increase in the sales of some cycling equipment.

Speaking about the proposed changes, Cllr Tom Hayes, Cabinet Member for Financial Inclusion and Zero Carbon Oxford, said: “Coronavirus has suddenly given British cities cleaner air. Increasingly, those braving Oxford’s empty streets are crying out to clean up our communities, and this City Council is listening to them.

Why should we return to pollution-spewing traffic that harms human health when we know the pandemic is preying on people with underlying health conditions?”

Oxford City Council declared a climate emergency in January 2019 and was named the number one local authority in the UK for tackling air pollution by magazine Government Business. Reports commissioned in recent years have highlighted the need to reduce private car usage in the city for health and environmental reasons.

The planned Zero Emission Zone (ZEZ), due to be introduced this year, has been pushed back to 2021 as a result of COVID-19. Under the new scheme, diesel and petrol vehicles will be charged to enter Oxford city centre, similar to the London Congestion Charge. Research shows that more than 75% of nitrogen dioxide emissions in Oxford come as a result of transport.

Image Credit to: Liv Cashman/Unsplash.com

‘Policy hackathon’ seeks solutions for Oxford after Coronavirus

Global Shapers Oxford is hosting a ‘policy hackathon’ to solve local challenges arising from the COVID-19 outbreak.

The ‘hackathon’ invites participants to create data-driven solutions to help Oxford recover from the effects of the pandemic.

The online event, called Policy Hacks Oxford, aims to unite the city’s academic, business, and government sectors and to “ensure all stakeholders have a voice in the solution-building process.” Its goal is to create higher levels of civic engagement and to build solutions around shared values.

Open to students, professionals, and members of the community, the ‘hackathon’ will take place via Zoom from 22nd to 25th May.

Participants will work over the weekend to create policy proposals to address key challenges facing Oxford. On Monday evening, they will present their ideas before a panel of judges consisting of city councillors, experts, and DPhil students.

The event focuses on four challenge areas: mental health, local economy, homelessness, and community engagement.

Project leader Juhi Kore consulted stakeholders around Oxford to decide on these areas, which resemble “the most pressing challenges” facing the city. The panel of judges is composed of experts in each area, including the CEOs of the Oxford Hub and the housing charity Aspire Oxfordshire.

Juhi, an MPhil student at St Anthony’s College, had planned the ‘hackathon’ in December but adapted the event after the emergence of COVID-19.

She told Cherwell: “It was when the pandemic started to take over the news cycle that we decided to look at which problems had least resources devoted to them and the challenges which will arise. This is a first of its kind event at the University, that is bringing stakeholders together to collectively shape the local response to the pandemic.”

In addition to uniting the public and private sectors in the city, Juhi hopes that the solutions will inform future decision making, both in Oxford and elsewhere.

“We’ve talked to local government and councillors, and some of them will be judging the event. This makes it easier for us to implement solutions. We want to have a very tangible outcome, with realistic policies, and to make sure we build solutions which can be scaled elsewhere.”

Global Shapers Oxford, the local hub of the World Economic Forum’s Global Shapers Community, has partnered with local organisations for the event, including the City Council, Oxford Hub, Aspire Oxford, Students Against Corona, and several University departments. Participants can sign up on its website.

Image Credit to: Tetiana Shyshkina/Unsplash.com

“Ladies, ladies, ladies, ladies” – the women at the forefront of lockdown releases

0

My initial self-isolation playlist contained what I thought I would want to listen to during this indoor period – wistful folk-rock and simmering ambient, the types of music I feel rooted and reflective in. How wrong I was.

Since the onset of lockdown, a number of factors have encouraged my Spotify queue to fill with female-fronted pop and R&B: the frequent need for a motivational boost, the balmy weather outside my window, and the search for an up-tempo accompaniment to home workouts and meanders around the block. But, above all, is the fact that at this point in time women seem to be releasing quality projects in these genres, left, right and centre.

It all began with Dua Lipa’s much-anticipated sophomore album Future Nostalgia, which was released early on March 27th after the double blow of being leaked in its entirety, and having a carefully planned release strategy pulled out from under its feet by a global pandemic. Lipa remained pragmatic, remarking that the cancellation of countless tour dates and festivals was ‘a small price to pay’. Now the newly-crowned ‘Quarantine Queen’ finds herself the soundtrack to workout videos rather than dancefloor sets, her impact manifested in getting the population moving not in clubs, but in living rooms.

Since then, a torrent of releases have gone ahead in spite of, or even because of, current circumstances: Rina Sawayama’s genre-exploding SAWAYAMA, the accomplished Hayley Williams’ solo release Petals for Armor, and ALMA’s debut offering Have U Seen Her? to name a few from the alt-pop sphere. The release of Laura Marling’s seventh studio album Song for Our Daughter was also brought forward from August to early April in response to the pandemic.

Other female artists have taken the opportunity to drop surprise projects, to the delight of antsy fans. Mahalia’s Isolation Tapes EP was put out on her 22nd birthday, the day she would have been playing Brixton Academy. The gorgeously intimate first track BRB strikes all the right chords, relaying an intense aching for a faraway loved one, which feels so apt right now.

The lockdown has also led to positive creative stimulus for artists willing to embrace a more DIY approach, in a situation where the often-overlooked abilities to self-write and produce become pivotal.

One of the most exciting releases, and so far the only full-length album by a major artist to be made completely from scratch during the isolation period, is Charli XCX’s how i’m feeling now. Tethering herself to an ambitious deadline of just six weeks, she explained ‘There’s more likely to be some kind of screw-up or error in a short amount of time, which is probably more interesting’.

The result is brash, unbounded electro-pop which exudes anxiety and liberation in equal measures. In involving her fans through Zoom conferences, Charli has provided exactly what they crave right now: some sense of spontaneity and expression during a time of restriction and limitation. Studio perfection is now secondary – delivering responsive art to lethargic listeners has been dutifully reprioritised.

This is not to say that there should be pressure on artists to create and release in what is clearly a uniquely challenging time for every individual. It is also understandable that for some, planned releases no longer feel appropriate in this shifted global situation; Sam Smith’s originally titled To Die For, which had been slated for a May 1st release, remains suspended until further notice. But seeing artists like Charli XCX turn to music as more than a living, but as their means of survival through a period of uncertainty and stagnation, is triumphant.

We’re also seeing female artists hone new skills and take charge of promotion to push through with their disrupted releases. Kehlani’s It Was Good Until It Wasn’t is an admirable example of making the best of the situation, with a striking reworked album cover and four exemplary ‘quarantine style’ videos self-directed at home.

It remains inevitable however, that many major artists are choosing to postpone highly anticipated projects: Lady Gaga, Alicia Keys, HAIM and The 1975 have all fallen victim to delays. How much of this is a financial decision, incited by the obliteration of opportunities for conventional touring, promotion and physical sales, versus genuine logistical issues or discomfort surrounding releasing music in a sensitive global atmosphere, is unclear. Audiences may have more time on their hands, but judging whether that equates to receptivity, whilst staying wary of overstepping (no one wants to replicate a Gal Gadot-style cancellation) must be at the forefront of artists’ concerns.

On the flip side, the decision by Fiona Apple to bring forward the release of her first record in eight years, Fetch the Bolt Cutters, and in doing so risk rejecting the traditional album cycle, brought an immense pay-off. In her case, the timeliness of a masterwork exploring themes of isolation and confinement was met with resounding critical acclaim.

The continued release of long-form projects is so important for listeners left dissatisfied by one-off charity singles or novelty songs tailored for TikTok. It is full-length bodies of work that provide a vital medium for perspective and emotional fulfilment.

One common factor sticks out plainly: it is broadly the music industry’s female contingent who are stepping up to the plate, showcasing adaptability, resourcefulness and compassion in doing so.

This isn’t to say that men aren’t playing their part too; I have appreciated listens through planned releases from Thundercat to Tom Misch and Yussef Dayes, Jack Garratt to Moses Sumney. But when I look back on lockdown, it will have been the women artists that carried me through.

Indie cinema’s uncertain future

If nothing else, the chaos provoked by the COVID-19 pandemic has been indiscriminate. Very few industries have been spared by its impact, whether that takes the form of job cutbacks, venue closures or event cancellations, in what has felt like a real-time stripping back of the usual structures that hold up modern life. Among them has been the travails of the cinema industry – and while few would name these struggles as one of the most tragic consequences of COVID-19’s spread, it’s certainly not without its own significance.

With theatres shut down worldwide and new releases either redirected to video-on-demand or shunted down the calendar, cinemas are on the ropes – the massive US chain AMC Theatres, which also owns UK outlet Cineworld, has spent the last couple of weeks on the verge of bankruptcy. Early on in what will likely be a fight lasting over a year, it’s abundantly clear that whatever form the cinema industry takes when it re-emerges on the other side of this pandemic will be a thoroughly changed one.

A lot of the media coverage has centred on the impact on big multiplexes, and that’s not unreasonable. They’re the big money-makers of the industry – whenever a new Marvel film launches, for instance, it’s cinemas like AMC who are programming round-the-clock shows and selling comically huge servings of food and drink to families for a massive mark-up. For the vast majority of worldwide filmgoers, they’re the absolute centre of their cinematic experience – and not without good reason. The big screen seems the most obvious home for huge, epic spectacles with crashing sound, glossy visuals and air-punching moments best experienced with a big crowd. 

Ultimately, though, it can easily be argued that these huge multiplexes are actually among the less threatened cinemas. AMC may teeter on the brink of bankruptcy at the moment, but they’re still a massive global corporation who will be highly eligible for the litany of government business bailouts that this crisis has necessitated. If worst comes to worst, there are plenty of big companies waiting to pull out the chequebook and rescue the industry themselves – Netflix, for instance, has had recent experience in buying out and paying for big cinemas. Likewise, companies like Disney pour hundreds of millions into their tentpole releases; they can’t let the venues through which they’re consumed collapse.

Things seem less certain for the kinds of cinemas beneath the notice of big corporations and governments. Independent cinemas, and the smaller prestige films that they screen, are perhaps more directly in the line of fire of COVID-19’s economic impact, for quite a few different reasons. For one, smaller cinemas often take the form of a local business or a minor chain who don’t have the same corporate backing as the likes of AMC – once the funds start to run low, as they already are, there seems to be little to fall back on, and it’s uncertain how much small business loans will be able to help prevent this collapse. They’re also simply more expendable. While the argument for seeing huge blockbusters on the big screen alone is easy, it’s harder to insist on the same for quiet and meditative character pieces. Plenty of 2020’s independent releases have therefore taken the road straight to online download, skipping a cinema release entirely, ascertaining that they’ll be further down in the queue whenever the industry boots back up.

Even when the smoke clears, it’s not so clear indie releases will have the same position they once had, precarious as it already was. Consumers are likelier to be more skittish with their money in the wake of COVID-19, and more cautious with their trips into the outside world, and indie releases, which could just as easily be enjoyed within the comforts of home on a television screen, will probably bear the brunt of that. This process was already going on, anyway – the box office analyst Scott Mendelson of Forbes has long argued that cinemas are turning into ‘arcades’, solely reserved for gimmicky experiences which cannot be replicated at home, with COVID only accelerating this. 

Yet, recently, there was a little flash of hope for smaller cinema in the form of the runaway box office success of Best Picture winner Parasite, which actually expanded from specialist outlets like Curzon to multiplex cinemas through sheer force of demand. While not quite independent cinema, original releases not related to franchises have also succeeded lately, such as Rian Johnson’s hit whodunit Knives Out, and the Adam Sandler thriller Uncut Gems. It’s not clear if there will even be space for these successes in a cautious post-COVID world, in which only the safest possible bets (usually meaning something tagged with an existing brand name) are allowed to thrive.

Perhaps these predictions are overly pessimistic – I certainly hope so. Independent cinema will survive in some form anyway, but it would be a crying shame if great, risky releases like Eliza Hittman’s abortion drama Never Rarely Sometimes Always, which received a VOD-only release in the UK, are relegated to fodder for the massive bank of streaming content available online. The big screen should be a home for a litany of different experiences beyond just the loud ones. The demise of independent cinemas would be such that the film industry, as a whole, becomes a lesser one. 

Image via Wikimedia