Thursday 28th August 2025
Blog Page 505

Review: Four Tet’s ‘Sixteen Oceans’

0

Few genres of music (jazz excluded, perhaps) are more able to capture the intricacy of human movement and physicality than dance music. The opening tracks of Four Tet’s latest album do just that, reminding us why the UK producer has become such a celebrated live act. On ‘School’, Kieran Hebden masterfully constructs melodies that extend, protract, reach out like limbs before collapsing back in on themselves, while ‘Baby’ is sensual and intimate, a chopped vocal sample (courtesy of who else but, er, Ellie Goulding) laid naked over a fragmented beat. Yet these indubitable dance bangers also have a certain naivety, evident as ‘Baby’ breaks down into a naturalistic idyll of tentative synth and birdsong. The simplicity of one’s surroundings is a recurrent point of reference for Kieran’s new material.

Sixteen Oceans is the latest in a steady stream of album releases from Four Tet. While perhaps not worthy of the label ‘prolific’, Kieran has maintained an astounding level of consistency over 20+ years as a musician, his work equally experimental and emotionally resonant enough for him to have become a household name amongst critics and ravers alike. Sixteen Oceans is both virtuosic and breathtakingly simple, offering a timely musing on youth, nature, and growth; here, each of the sixteen tracks is an ocean, something for the listener to traverse, to contemplate, to immerse themselves in.

The pace slows on the next pair of tracks. The titles of ‘Teenage Birdsong’ and ‘Romantics’ both evoke the purity and innocence of youth, and the music has a dreamy, stripped-back quality, largely thanks to Kieran’s penchant for acoustic instrumentation. ‘Teenage Birdsong’ pairs a rolling breakbeat with a panpipe solo before fading out in a drowsy rallentando. ‘Romantics’ is lullaby-esque: washed-out synth, bubble-gum vocals, and plucked strings mingle with the unmistakable chimes of a musical box. Kieran’s approach here is deliberately simplistic; the tape-loop beat could easily have been lifted straight from Portishead’s Dummy.

Yet this dreamy style of arrangement is far less effective on ‘Love Salad’, which seems to sink too far into the ambience. Different melodies and layers do emerge from the track’s muffled, submerged beat over its 7-minute duration, but all too quickly they cower away and withdraw again. It’s a ponderous track, at times more like an iPhone alarm tone than any striking form of dance music. Something resembling a payoff does eventually arrive, but ‘Love Salad’ (as with some of Sixteen Oceans’ other more reserved moments) lacks the sort of visceral attack seen in the work of emerging UK producers such as Loraine James and Kelly Lee Owens.

Fortunately, ‘Insect Near Piha Beach’ offers an upshift in tempo, clicking into gear with a more rave-oriented beat and decisive arrangement. Jagged hi-hats underpin breathy vocal samples and a repeated raga motif which shimmers before dissipating into kaleidoscopic fragments. The track’s more hallucinatory qualities provide one of the most ecstatic moments on the album. Listening, you can imagine yourself stumbling out of a beachside party, hand in hand with a loved one. The sun rises over the water. The endorphins flow.

‘Something in the Sadness’ is a slower burn but sustains the emotional momentum of the previous track. Twinkling, winking synth pads fuse with stabs that have all the texture of a bowed cello string: only the thudding bass drum keeps the whole track from falling apart. Careful layering of sounds here gives a greater sense of contemplation and introspection, which also comes across on several of the ‘interlude’ tracks that appear throughout Sixteen Oceans. While some of these are fairly nondescript and contribute little to the flow of the album, instrumentals such as ‘ISTM’ are beautifully fragile; here, the birdsong motif returns, intersected by moody piano. ‘Bubbles at Overlook 25th March 2019’ feels meaningful too, with Kieran observing the ephemerality of his surroundings. We hear the bubbles swell into life and burst almost immediately, their existence necessarily fleeting.

Sixteen Oceans takes us back to nature, reminding us of a simpler state of being. We’re repeatedly transported by recordings of birds chirping or of leaves rustling underfoot; ‘4T Recordings’ gives the impression of spectating the dawn chorus from behind a wall of glass. Four Tet draws us out of the chaos and anxiety of our minds, giving us a brief, soothing moment of serenity which is all the more precious given the current state of isolation so many of us find ourselves in, stuck inside and left to battle with our own thoughts as we are. Kieran himself communicates through his Instagram that “it’s a relief…that I released an album at this time that I made to have a peaceful mood. Music helps me cope with everything.”

The final track on the album is perhaps the best, ‘Mama Teaches Sanskrit’ being a tribute to a 5000-year-old language and to Kieran’s Indian family heritage – something of a sister track to ‘Ba Teaches Yoga’ on 2013’s Beautiful Rewind. The resonating synths again seem childlike: sensitive, curious, eager. The mother’s voice enters, warm and lyrical, followed by an infant’s sing-song imitations. It’s an interaction which symbolises the purity of childhood, of a fresh, inquisitive mind starting to learn from its environment – perhaps the time where a human life comes closest to emulating the simplicity of nature. Four Tet has become a master of capturing such moments. At times, this is an album which seems to speak the language of human existence itself.

Remote Teaching Is No Good Quick Fix

0

With every new email from vice and pro-vice chancellors, it looks like Oxford is planning to provide undergraduates with Trinity Term’s full workload and exams, but remotely. While the logistics of how this would work thus far remain undecided, the University’s final decision will face many challenges.

The coronavirus outbreak will inevitably affect the physical health of students.  A significant percentage are likely to contract the illness, forcing many students to miss multiple exams or assignments, and that’s far from the worst-case scenario. Remote learning may also negatively affect the mental wellbeing of many students. The typical full workload will likely still be demanded but without any of the welfare programmes which Oxford offers, or the social life which can make the workload tolerable. Furthermore, remote examinations rely on every student having access to a computer with an internet connection, in a silent room. This is, of course, impossible for many students.

In my view, Oxford has two options. The first: cancelling Trinity entirely and continuing from where we left off in Michaelmas 2020. Exams could be taken during Michaelmas rather than Trinity in the future, with the academic year beginning in January rather than October. This would have the positive future effect of allowing Oxford to interview and to make offers after A-Level results are announced in August, rather than making conditional offers in January. Conditional offers are currently based upon unreliable predicted grades, meaning the University must estimate how many students will miss their grades.

Option 1 would also provide finalists with more time to revise ( they would be able to study during the long summer vacation rather than the Easter vacation) and allow all those with end-of-year exams the opportunity to enjoy sunny Trinity term with slightly less stress. This change would, however, need be carried out in conjunction with other British universities in addition to UCAS, in order to bring timings in sync. Despite this, such a change would make sense in the long-run and the current outbreak is a great opportunity to switch from the old calendar to the new.

It may be overly optimistic to assume that university will be able to resume in time for Michaelmas. An Imperial College study suggests that the outbreak may continue for up to eighteen months, with a second wave of the virus possible in the winter. If this outbreak follows the expected trend, the economy will all but shut down, and there will not be much of a jobs market waiting for finalists.

The issues with remote teaching will only be perpetuated over time. As such, it may be sensible for the University to go for option 2: something similar to a group rustication, where studies are suspended for a year and then Trinity 2021 picks up from where Hilary Term 2020 left off. Group rustication would be the default option, with students perhaps choosing to opt-out due to a good reason, based upon the likelihood of the pandemic continuing. This option may be difficult to decide upon now, but Oxford choosing option 2 would certainly set a good precedent for other universities to do the same, and it may be necessary given the projected span of coronavirus. Either way, both of the above options are better than the remote teaching and examining which is currently planned. The University should at least consider them, even if they may seem inconvenient in the short term.

Review: Emma.

0

With Little Women and David Copperfield playing on screens, and The Secret Garden coming up in April, Emma. is one in a remarkable string of adaptations of much-loved, as much-adapted, literary classics in the current cinema season. Director Autumn de Wilde’s first feature film, starring Anya Taylor-Joy, is based on Jane Austen’s well-known story of a smart and wealthy young woman who fights the boredom of country life by matchmaking (sometimes successfully, but mostly not), until she learns to be less intrusive, and finally finds love herself in her long-term friend and mentor George I-told-you-so Knightley. 

While Emma. might not be as emotionally disputed as Pride and Prejudice (the allegedly upcoming new TV version of which is certain to inflame the eternal who-is-the-best-Darcy-of-all-times-battle), it is nevertheless revered as the last of her novels Austen herself saw published, and already the subject of a row of film adaptations (including the 1995 Beverly Hills version Clueless, two 1996 films starring Gwyneth Paltrow and Kate Beckinsale, and a 2009 BBC miniseries with Romola Garai). Thus, Emma. entails the mixture of risk and appeal that appertains to every classic when it comes to (re)adaptation: any new version is in danger of vexing passionate fans, inevitably compared with predecessors, and expected to justify its existence by providing ‘a new angle’ for a story often-told. 

On the other hand, classics are thought to be infinitely reinterpretable, and the load of public expectations may be just the prickling challenge a director is looking for – whether in hope to satisfy them or to frustrate them with relish. Autumn de Wilde’s adaptation, however, appears to want to cut off any such discussions from the outset – ‘This is the new Emma. Take it or leave it!’, is what the bold full stop in the title seems to say. But what does this new Emma. offer?

In short: some pretty, well-composed pictures and a good deal of slapstick. The new adaptation bears the overall pastel look of a cream cake, punctuated by a glowing yellow dress here and a crimson red coat there. It is nice to look at the often conspicuously symmetrical shots in which not a single well-trimmed curl, not a cherry on a cupcake, and not a flower in a vase is out of place. As well arranged as the rooms of Hartfield, Randalls and Donwell are the characters’ movements within them: often symmetrical, always visibly choreographed, like the steps of the footmen that obediently carry around screens to shield Mr Woodhouse, Emma’s always worried father (Bill Nighy), and all of his beloved against draught – of which Mr. Woodhouse is obsessively afraid, thus providing the film’s running gag.

Emma. is a decidedly comic adaptation, over the top, and ready to surprise: in his first appearance we see Mr. Knightley (Johnny Flynn) strip and present his naked backside; in a parallel scene, Emma irritably gathers up her dress to warm her bare bum at the fireside. Every instance of earnest, intimacy or passion is subverted and ridiculed. To give an example: Austen’s novel includes a scene in which Emma holds her baby niece, placating Knightley, cross with her as always on account of some misbehaviour, by the view of this domestic idyll. In Autumn de Wilde’s adaptation, Emma awkwardly holds a toddler in her arms that is clearly too big to be so cradled. When Knightley sits next to her and they both look at the child, so far so iconic, the child burps – and is taken away by a hysterical mother screaming for the nanny, while Emma and Mr. Knightley burst out laughing. Similarly, the romantic denouement at the end of the film (“I cannot make speeches, Emma…”) is disrupted by a nosebleed. In these (and other) instances, the film crosses the line to parody.

Bill Nighy as Mr. Woodhouse, Emma’s father.

Alright, so Emma. is a more slapstick-y adaption, with a little unexpected nudity – what of it! After all, Austen’s novel is satirical, imbued with sharp irony. So where is the problem? There is none, perhaps: one can go watch the film that, taken for itself, is entertaining enough and perfectly enjoyable. As an adaptation of Austen’s novel, however, Emma. falls short. I do not mean to bring forward highly problematic and scarcely helpful terms like ‘fidelity’ of an adaptation towards the original. But in comparison to Austen’s novel, Emma. fails at quite a fundamental task: interesting the audience in Emma’s development. 

Emma is known to be one of the least likeable, least accessible of Austen’s protagonists: she is clever and caring, yes, but also snobby, conceited, spoilt, and incidentally outright mean. She is not as charmingly witty as Elizabeth Bennet or as considerate as Elinor Dashwood. The current adaptation has been praised – and rightfully so – for bringing out a meaner, edgier Emma, less charming than in previous adaptations, but more in line with Austen’s heroine. In Austen’s novel, however, a complex narrative structure allows readers to see Emma’s flaws and errors, but also to engage with her and to see the world through her eyes. Emma may not be excessively amiable in the beginning, but that will, thanks to Austen’s skilful guidance, not prevent readers from identifying with her and developing an interest in her realising her misjudgements and ultimately finding happiness.

Crucial to the unfolding of  this structure is the character of Mr. Knightley, who acts as Emma’s corrective, sincerely interested in her moral improvement, while still devoted to her. Unfortunately, the Mr. Knightley of the 2020 adaptation, with his ill-cut whiskers and shaggy sex-appeal, is totally unconvincing as the voice of reason. He still rebukes Emma, but, apparently, merely for the thrill of it. A new interpretation of the somewhat paternalistic love interest Knightley, a friend of Emma’s father, seventeen years her senior, and constantly lecturing her? Yes, please! But not simply by making Knightley look younger, and reducing the slow-grown and multi-faceted affection between Emma and Knightley to mere sexual tension (all too obviously showcased at the Highbury ball scene following the famous “With whom will you dance? – With you, if you’ll ask me.”).

The lack of a convincing Mr. Knightley is one reason why, watching Emma., one may end up, as I did, just not caring whether Emma learns her lessons and is enabled to meet Knightley on equal terms – something that is almost impossible in reading the novel, I would claim, and that takes away the momentum of the story. But primarily, this is the effect of the screwball comedy, the reduction of characters to caricatures, and the repeated undermining of sincere communication and moments of emotional depth. All that creates a distance between audience and characters, preventing real engagement with the latter and concern for their lot. In spite of all the scenes putting their bodies on the spot (the stripping, the bleeding), the characters do not appear as people of flesh and blood. Emma. the film simply does not take Emma the novel seriously enough for that.

So in the end, the film left me with the stale aftertaste of an opportunity not seized: I would have liked to see an ‘edgy’ Emma undergoing a credible change, in a less caricatural setting, at the side of a not so one-dimensional Knightley. As it is, I can’t help but find that Emma. resembles the pastel cupcakes served in it: pretty to look at, but ultimately not very substantial.

Comfort Reading in the Time of Covid-19

  1. David Nicholls 

If rom-coms are the most comforting type of movie, then David Nicholls writes the most comforting type of novel. He is best known for One Day, a moving but also funny and warm novel on friendship, love and the passing of time. Starter for Ten, about an awkward first-year trying to get onto University Challenge, and Us, which follows a family on a tour of the great art of Europe, are equally relaxing and heart-warming to read. Incidentally, Nicholls also has an incredibly gentle and soothing voice, so if you spot a podcast with him make sure to give it a listen. 

  1. Louisa May Alcott 

Little Women was the first classic I ever read and, as a 10-year-old, I thought it was mind-numbingly boring. So, I started reading it whenever I couldn’t sleep and gradually over the years, after rereading it many times, it has become the most comforting book imaginable to me. The warmth of the family, the relationships between the sisters and their kindness towards others in the community bring me so much joy. It is the most worn book on my bookshelf and, ten years later, definitely not a boring read anymore!

  1. Roald Dahl 

Roald Dahl was my childhood hero – I can still recite passages of Fantastic Mr. Fox and Charlie and the Chocolate Factory from memory. His worlds are so beautifully fantastical that reading these books now has to be one of the easiest ways to return to the imagination and wonder of being a child. I actually decided this week to read one of Dahl’s books of short stories for adults, Kiss Kiss. They are significantly more macabre and sexual than the books of my childhood but at their core they are just as surprising, extraordinary and funny. What could be more comforting now than reading short stories about a man who turns into a bee and a celibate vicar who gets eaten by a woman?

  1. Elizabeth Strout 

Whilst Roald Dahl is comforting to read because his books take us far away from reality, Elizabeth Strout is comforting to read precisely because she writes so well about reality. She is best known for Olive Kitteridge and My Name is Lucy Barton and I am yet to find someone who hasn’t fallen absolutely in love with these books after reading them. The prose is deceivingly simple and easy to read but gives such a profound insight into the relationships within communities and families, two groups which have suddenly become significantly more important. 

  1. William Boyd 

William Boyd is the master of the immersive story. His books often chronicle one character through every stage of their life, capturing them so skilfully that they begin to feel uncannily real. I read Sweet Caress when I was 16 but I can still visualise every stage of Amory Clay’s life, from her relationships in 1920s Berlin to her career as a photographer in the Second World War, as if it had been told to me by a friend. Any Human Heart is equally absorbing, written as the journals of a writer and his experiences of the events of the twentieth century – he even meets Virginia Woolf, Evelyn Waugh and James Joyce. The filmic dreaminess of Love is Blind also makes it the perfect book to curl up in bed with for a day. 


Is there a book which is particularly important to you? A new discovery or an old favourite which inspires or uplifts? We want to hear about it! Send in pitches (the more personal the better) to [email protected] and [email protected] to be featured on our brand new weekly ‘Friday Favourite’ article.

Government funds three Oxford COVID-19 projects

Three University of Oxford research projects will receive shares of a £20million government investment to combat coronavirus. Six UK projects will benefit from this research funding, announced by Business Secretary Alok Sharma on Monday.

The three projects include work to develop an effective vaccine, to manufacture a vaccine at a million-dose scale, and to test drugs which may help treat confirmed COVID-19 patients.

A research team led by Prof Sarah Gilbert, developing a new vaccine to protect against COVID-19, will receive £2.2million. The funding will support pre-clinical testing of the new vaccine, new manufacturing, and clinical trials in humans. The team have developed a vaccine, made from an adenovirus, and is planning to begin testing on adults aged 18-50 next month.

Dr Sandy Douglas’ research term, aiming to develop processes to manufacture vaccines at a million dose scale, will receive £0.4million. This means, if clinical trials of a vaccine are successful, the vaccine can reach high-risk groups as quickly as possible.

Prof Peter Horby’s research team, testing whether existing or new drugs can help patients hospitalised with confirmed COVID-19, will receive £2.1million. The team aims to have data available to inform patient treatment in 3 months. The trial will first test two HIV drugs.

An Edinburgh University project receiving £4.9million in funding will collect samples and data from COVID-19 patients to help control the outbreak and provide treatment. An Imperial College London team aims to develop antibodies to target the novel coronavirus, which may help to find a potential therapy. A Queens University Belfast project will test drugs on cells to investigate how toxic effects of coronavirus can be reduced.

The £20million is funded by the Department of Health and Social Care through the National Institute for Health Research and by UK Research and Innovation. This follows the government’s funding of £30million to the National Institute for Health Research for research into COVID-19 and £10million to increase Public Health England’s capacity to test people and monitor the virus.

Business Secretary Alok Sharma said: “Whether testing new drugs or examining how to repurpose existing ones, UK scientists and researchers have been working tirelessly on the development of treatments for coronavirus. The projects we are funding today will be vital in our work to support our valuable NHS and protect people’s lives.”

Chief Scientific Adviser Patrick Vallance said: “The UK is home to incredible scientists and researchers who are all at the forefront of their field, and all united in their aim; protecting people’s lives from coronavirus. The announcement made today reflects the vital work being undertaken by our scientists to help develop vaccines and treatments. This research could herald important breakthroughs that will put the NHS in a stronger position to respond to the outbreak.”

Chief Medical Officer Professor Chris Whitty said: “The world faces an unprecedented challenge in our efforts to tackle the spread of COVID-19 and it is vital we harness our research capabilities to the fullest extent to limit the outbreak and protect life. Alongside the world-leading research overseen by the NIHR, these new 6 projects will allow us to boost our existing knowledge and test new and innovative ways to understand and treat the disease.”

Health Secretary Matt Hancock said: “In the midst of a global health emergency the UK is using all its extensive research expertise to quickly develop new vaccines to target this international threat. This investment will speed up globally-recognised vaccine development capabilities and help us find a new defence against this disease.”

Image: Ellie Wilkins

JCR Presidents criticize Oxford’s response to Amber Rudd ‘no-platforming’

0

The Committee of Oxford College JCR Presidents (PresCom) has published an Open Letter expressing their “disappointment and deep concerns” with the University of Oxford’s response to the recent ‘no-platforming’ of Amber Rudd by the UNWomen Society.

The Society’s short-notice cancellation of the International Women’s Day event where Rudd had been invited to speak reignited a debate surrounding freedom of speech at the University. After complaints from students and the Free Speech Union, the University decided to disaffiliate itself from UNWomen Oxford UK Society (Re-named to United Women Oxford Student Society).

The UNWomen Society cancelled the event as a result of student protest against Rudd’s links to the Windrush Scandal and affiliations to other government policies in her time as MP deemed to marginalize vulnerable communities in the UK. The Society claimed that “holding the event would have been incompatible with our intention to be an inclusive and welcoming society.”

In a tweet the following day, Oxford University responded: “We strongly disapprove of the decision by the UNWomen Oxford UK Society to disinvite Amber Rudd after she had been asked to speak. Oxford is committed to freedom of speech & opposes no-platforming. We will be taking steps to ensure that this situation doesn’t happen in the future.”

Oxford University’s response to UNWomen Oxford UK disinviting Amber Rudd on March 5th 2020

The Committee of Oxford College JCR Presidents published an Open Letter on their Facebook page signed by 25 JCR Presidents on behalf of their respective colleges who have passed motions to condemn the University’s response.

In the midst of difficulty and great uncertainty, it is lamentable that the undersigned presidents’ must present this…

Posted by PresCom on Tuesday, 24 March 2020

PresCom condemns the University’s response primarily because of its lack of consideration of the student body. The letter states the response “failed on a number of premises to fulfil its duty of care to its students”, emphasising that the University’s conduct was “negligent of student wellbeing and welfare” and “lacked any student consultation (despite commenting on student matters)”.

Moreover, the Committee accuses the University of following and affirming the supposed “false narrative” presented by national newspapers. PresCom, in compliance with UNWomen Oxford, disagrees with the narrative that this cancellation was an act of no-platforming infringing on the University’s commitments to freedom of speech.

The letter argues that the University should have consulted students prior to making a public response.

PresCom contends that this response demonstrates “the widely felt sentiment that the University is quick to abandon its students in the face of unwarranted backlash from national newspapers and high-profile individuals”.

The letter points to the abuse received by Oxford students who were named in national newspapers which the University did not address in its response. Particularly, they emphasise the neglect of the welfare and opinions of BAME students. The society echoed this in their statement on March 6th, stating: “We believe that the University of Oxford’s statement shows a lack of regard for the welfare of black students”.

PresCom further criticizes the University’s lack of transparency in not specifying who its recent statement represents, implying the response is on behalf of the entire University of Oxford whilst disregarding the opposing views of parts of the student body.

The letter concludes with four requests made to the Vice-Chancellor and the University, petitioning for a “public apology to its students” and a commitment to communicating with students before future public responses. The Committee urges for more transparency and greater consideration of student welfare.

The letter emphasises that “as students, we want to be able to feel as though we are not only being listened to by our University, but also that our welfare is prioritised.”

PresCom stresses they take no stance on no-platforming, focusing solely on the University’s conduct in responding to the issue.  

A spokesperson for the University told Cherwell: “The University is strongly committed to freedom of speech and opposes no-platforming. We encourage our students to debate and engage with a range of views, and to treat others with the courtesy and dignity that they would expect themselves. The University strongly disapproved of the decision to disinvite Amber Rudd and the Proctors have taken just and proportionate action according to the policies which underpin the University’s stance on freedom of speech.”

Cherwell has reached out to United Women Oxford Student Society and the University for further comment.

Making Your Home Space Your Own

0

The world around us is changing at an alarming rate, forcing many of us to rethink our plans for the next few months. With these changes may come the need to move back into our hometowns. Of course, this presents a much bigger problem: moving out of Oxford accommodation over the vacation period can already be an arduous process of living out of bags for weeks and piling up stuff that you don’t need at home. However, the prospect of staying at home next term, when teaching will most likely take place online, as well as the current need to practice social distancing, means that finding workspaces in public libraries and cafes is no longer an option. To combat my fears over being at home for possibly months, I’ve had to find ways of adapting the space that I am currently in to being home for the whole day and having to exercise, study, relax and sleep, all in one room.

The first thing I knew I had to start tackling was the mountain of bags taking up half the floor space in my room. I started by clearing out things I no longer wear: shoes, clothes, accessories, everything. I didn’t do this all in a day, but divided tasks to maintain a sense of accomplishment. This means I’m technically still in the clear out phase! If you haven’t touched something in six months, you’ve got to ask yourself if it’s really that necessary to keep. If you have siblings, it might be a good idea to try and get them to do the same, especially if you share a room. Try and be responsible with the stuff you don’t need by reselling, donating or recycling wherever possible. If you have a lot of books, you can send them to your friends and get them to do the same in return. That way, you always have something to read.

Once the things you don’t need are gone and there is a little space to walk around, it’s time to focus on how to make your spaces feel different. Sitting rooms and dining rooms are not an option for everyone, so making the room you spend most of your time in a place where you can do multiple things is key. First of all, make sure you have a bed cover, even if it’s just a sheet you toss over your bed. I’ve found that after some snacking breaks, it’s easy to leave things like crumbs and dust behind. To make your bed both a chilling and a sleeping space, make sure your duvet, pillow and sheets stay nice and clean under the cover. If you have any spare pillows that you don’t sleep on, you can chuck them over the sheet to rest on while you eat snacks, read books or watch a film.

If you have a desk space, clear it! Make sure this can be a space to work if you need it to be. If you want to make sure you don’t snack at your desk, keep treats off the table and in a separate box or bag away from where you’re working. I find keeping things that remind me to do little bits of reading helpful, for example placing the book I need to start on my desk the night before. I also have much more limited space for all my books and folders than I used to at university so I ordered some cheap magazine files to keep different subjects in one place (you can buy at least 2 for £4 on eBay, including delivery). Or you could just use an old cardboard box, cut it into shape and decorate it yourself. You can then store these under the desk to save space if you don’t have shelves. If you are super limited in space and need a desk, you might want to invest in a small folding table (around £35 on eBay) or a bed desk (around £15 on eBay).

If you have any floor space, you can use it for daily exercise. If you can’t go outside for a walk, then indoor Zumba, yoga and cardio sessions are a great option. Yoga mats are widely available online and YouTube fitness sessions are free! I find that being indoors makes you feel less inclined to commit to exercise, so having items such as a yoga mat in your eyeline or putting reminders on your phone gives you a little more motivation to stay healthy. Being back in a room filled with objects that reflect a younger, different version of yourself may feel strange. But pictures of friends and postcards of places you’ve been to can be little reminders that things will eventually start to feel more normal again. I use the FreePrints app for printing pictures which is really cheap and delivers them to your door. If you share a room with siblings, you could encourage them to do this together, so that they don’t feel you’re taking over their space. If you have a much younger sibling at home, try having a weekly competition where the best piece of art they create can go on a special place on the wall. This will also keep them busy when you need to study and write essays.

Try to make the space you’re in one where you set the rules. If that means having a box in your room where you put all your gadgets away for a while, do it. But remember not to be too harsh on yourself – your comfort and well-being matter and should always come first.

Fashion’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic

0

In times of crisis, fashion is rarely at the forefront of people’s minds. As the world attempts to navigate daily life in the midst of a global pandemic, and we adjust to the new normal of minimal socializing and a stronger-than-ever reliance on the internet, the plight of the fashion industry takes a backseat to more immediate fears for public health and the economy. It makes sense – who, right now, whether stuck at home in isolation, on the frontline of the fight against the virus, or worrying about how they’re going to pay the bills, is thinking about re-vamping their wardrobe for spring? Fashion isn’t critical to the functioning of society in the way that medical workers, firefighters, and those working the supply chain are. But it’s a vast industry consisting of brands that have a huge presence in the public consciousness, and so have a unique ability to influence people. Not only this, but resources such as textiles and factories can be hugely beneficial if redirected towards the fight against the virus.

LVMH paved the way for Fashion’s response to the crisis by announcing last Sunday that they would use their perfume production facilities (Parfums Christian Dior, Guerlain and Parfums Givenchy) to manufacture free hand sanitizer to distribute French hospitals, who desperately need it. Their press release stated that “through this initiative, LVMH intends to help address the risk of a lack of product in France and enable a greater number of people to continue to take the right action to protect themselves from the spread of the virus”, and that they would “honour this commitment for as long as necessary” This came 72 hours after a call from the French government for businesses to do what they could to help; by Monday, production was in motion. The brand was set to have produced twelve tonnes of hand sanitiser for Paris hospitals by the end of that same week. Soon after, brands L’Oréal and La Roche-Posay announced that they would follow suit.

On Wednesday, following a sharp rise in coronavirus cases in the company’s homeland of Spain, the Inditex fashion group, owners of Zara, announced that they would repurpose their factories to donate masks and other medical equipment to the hospitals who need them. In a statement to Vogue, they said they had already distributed 10,000 protective masks to hospitals and expected to be able to donate another 300,000 surgical masks by the end of the week. The company have had to close half their stores around the world, and although executive chairman Pablo Isla confidently asserted that it was the company’s “strong financial position” that meant they were ready to respond to the crisis, they’ve seen their sales fall by 24.1% as of early March. With Spain’s PM Pedro Sánchez warning that “the worst is yet to come”, and makeshift hospitals emerging in the capital to accommodate the rapidly growing number of patients, the company’s efforts will surely be appreciated greatly.

Magazines and individuals within the fashion community are playing their part, too. Vogue in particular is channelling its content towards the priorities of its readers in these unsettling times, publishing articles such as ’12 Ways To Turn Your Home Office Into A Productive Sanctuary’, and ‘Jewellery’s New Surreal Appeal Echoes The Strangeness Of Our Times’. Anna Wintour has pledged to stay at home, encouraging readers to do the same, as “there is no more important rule for us to follow.” As we begin to see high-profile fashion events such as the Met Gala being cancelled or postponed, it seems that many designers and models will be following suit. Influencers, the subsection of the fashion and social media community with arguably the most sway over public opinion, are also pledging financial support for the crisis – in Italy, Chiara Ferragni raised €3 million in a single day via a GoFundMe campaign and has made a personal donation of €100,000 to fund new hospital beds in one of Milan’s most over-run hospitals. Donatella Versace and her daughter have since made a €200,000 donation to the same hospital. Influential model-of-the-moment Bella Hadid issued a plea to her 29.2 million followers to take the virus seriously, and to not be “selfish”.

It may seem strange to consider fashion at such a time of global uncertainty, when hundreds of lives are being lost every day, but it’s also important to remember that any semblance of normality is something we should protect at all costs as the situation escalates. The fashion industry is playing a big part in providing relief for the crisis, and we need to follow their example: we might not have the resources to donate money or equipment to fight the pandemic, but we can listen to those whose work we admire when they tell us what we can do to help. Fashion is playing its part, and so can we– by wearing the clothes, jewellery, or makeup that help us feel normal, whatever that may be, but staying inside, keeping ourselves and others out of danger, and supporting the brands that are actively helping.

Oxford medical students join NHS to combat coronavirus

Oxford medical students have volunteered to help the NHS during a time of peak demand and stress. As of March 20, twenty-four 6th year students have joined the emergency department at the John Radcliffe Hospital in both administrative and patient-facing roles. This includes working at reception and performing blood tests.

According to the university, the students have already passed their Finals examinations and are qualified to deliver basic care. Additionally, non-final year students are assisting in a non-clinical capacity.

Dr Catherine Swales, the Director of Clinical Studies at Oxford University Medical School, told Cherwell that they “have volunteers from all clinical years” and that students are “matched with roles that need filling (as determined by the OUHFT). Non-final year students have been offered non-clinical roles.”

She adds that medical students are equipped for the environment of a national health emergency: “The whole course is designed to prepare students for practice. We would not allow students to volunteer in roles if we didn’t feel they were ready. We have an extensive pastoral care network both centrally and with the colleges and this is very active currently, supporting the students in what we all recognize is a stressful time.”

The COVID-19 pandemic has raised questions about how medical students might receive adequate teaching when universities are closed, especially as much of their practice is clinical. Nationally, universities are considering the possibility of graduating students early. The General Medical Council (GMC) has told students that “legally, it’s for the relevant university to decide whether or not you’re able to graduate”. It encourages universities to continue education and assessment so that medical students may join the workforce as quickly as possible.

Image Credit to Jackie Bowman / Children’s Wing, John Radcliffe Hospital / CC BY-SA 2.0.

Music: In Isolation but not Isolated

0

The unfolding coronavirus pandemic has led to the cancellation of concerts and festivals around the world: Glastonbury, entire seasons at the Royal Opera House and Metropolitan Opera, and, worst of all, Eurovision. Compared to the threat posed by the virus, these lost opportunities and cancellations may seem trivial, but they are upsetting nonetheless. The mass closure of schools and conservatoires and the effective ban on large gatherings, including gigs and concerts, can be especially upsetting if you are a musician, or know a musician whose livelihood is under threat.

On the brighter side, music is a lifeline for many people – listening to the right playlist can draw you from a state of inertia to a dance party in the kitchen during the long, and often worry-filled, hours of self-isolation (please resist the siren call of TikTok). Listening to music is undoubtedly a different experience in a world transformed by Covid-19 – the apparent dissolution of the musical community is clearest in the absence of gigs, concerts, and shows, meaning performers and audiences can no longer gather in a room to share their passion. However, the communal experience of listening to music need not be lost in isolation, even if it has been significantly altered. Rather than stunting the experience, the measures taken to reduce the spread of the virus have stimulated an influx of creative solutions to this issue, enabled by social media and other web platforms.

One noteworthy initiative attempting to tackle this issue of cultural connectivity is the Corona Cultural Festival 2020 Facebook Page, founded and operated by Millie Cant, a second-year music student at Pembroke College. The page includes a virtual book club hosted on the video call service Zoom, as well as a weekly list of recommendations of books, films, and documentaries. For communal music listening, there are collaborative Spotify playlists and a list of music recommendations shared on a Google Document that anyone can amend. It may not be the same experience as listening to a piece of music in a concert venue, but it provides a virtual space where music can be shared and recommendations exchanged, ensuring listening to music remains an interactive and communal experience even when not experienced simultaneously. Thus far, this page has amassed 1,659 followers, encouraging a creative communal space online in order to, in Millie’s words, “look out for our own and others’ mental and cultural health”. Here, listening to music is a communal experience in that it is linked to the recommendations and experiences of others within a virtual community.

The act of going to a concert has unfortunately been halted by the virus, and cannot truly be emulated virtually, as the physicality of the event is arguably a large part of the experience. However, the live-streaming of concerts and musical performances has allowed a preservation of the sense of immediacy felt in a concert – the listener is truly placed ‘in the moment’ as they hear a piece of music unfold in real-time. Even better, the live stream format helps listening to music to remain a communal experience despite geographical difference – like in a concert setting, everyone experiences the music in the same moment, and without the irritation of someone rustling sweet wrappers five seats away.

Furthermore, the fact that many of the streaming services for opera and classical music venues are now free and available on the Internet may allow a kickback against elitism in the classical community. With these free livestreaming services, such as the Berlin Philharmonic Digital Concert Hall, people will be able to explore new music at no cost and from the comfort of their homes. This isn’t to undermine the value of live concerts – for the performers, concerts are the centrepiece of performance culture and a vital source of revenue. However, it demonstrates that listening to music during this pandemic need not be an isolated experience, even when in isolation.

The Covid-19 pandemic is proving to be difficult for the music industry as bands, orchestras, opera companies, and music festivals are struggling, forced to cancel events for the safety of their audiences and the community at large. It has, therefore, become more important than ever to support both music and musicians culturally, financially, and communally. Live-streaming and services like Spotify, YouTube, Google Play and Apple Music, amongst others, allow for the continuation of a communal experience of listening to music. They also support artists – buying merchandise where possible and holding onto tickets for postponed concerts are also valuable steps towards supporting a future for the industry post-pandemic.