Wednesday, April 30, 2025
Blog Page 563

Review: Madlib and Freddie Gibbs – Bandana

0

Madlib is perhaps hip-hop’s greatest enigma. In a career spanning almost three decades he has studied a variety of genres, masterfully integrating them into his now well-formed, idiosyncratic sound. From Brazilian funk to classical jazz and everything in between, there seems to be very little that he cannot master. Even without a mobile phone to communicate on, he has been the mastermind of several ground-breaking collaborative hip-hop albums. Of course, the project Madvillainy– with the equally mysterious MF DOOM – immediately comes to mind, an album steeped in stunning obscurity and unmatched innovation. One thinks too of the Jaylib project, the result of Madlib’s rapport with the intuitively adroit J Dilla. Nonetheless, even for an artist lauded for his relentless refusal to be pigeonholed, the news that Madlib was working with Freddie Gibbs came as a surprise to everyone within hip-hop.

You see, Freddie Gibbs is, superficially speaking, no MF DOOM. Whereas the latter intricately weaves syllables and rhymes in and around the clouded bliss produced by Madlib’s sampler, one might expect Gibbs to simply charge through that very haze, incongruously lacerating it with every bar. For Gibbs is a rapper for whom the beat is mostly a platform, not a dancing partner. It is a pillar on which he can victoriously stand, breathlessly diffusing knowledge on the minutiae of street life. He is often compared to the incomparable Tupac Shakur, yet, without the glamour of the west coast, Gibbs is actually a different animal altogether. Harking from Gary, Indiana, a place in which it is estimated nearly 1/3rdof all houses are either unoccupied or abandoned, his work is gritter, darker and more brooding than almost any other rapper, dead or alive. Therefore, when Gibbs and Madlib’s first album, Piñata, was released in 2014, it would be unfair to say that expectations were low. In reality, there were no expectations at all. Who could have predicted how this bastion of the nihilistic world of crime would mesh with such a leviathan of underground music, albeit an incognito one? If there was scepticism, however, the two quickly dispelled it. With each artist taking a meditated step into each other’s worlds, Piñataproved to be a revelation. Supplemented by a terrific host of guest features, from the drawly Earl Sweatshirt to the bombastic Meechy Darko, the perfect blaxploitation picture was painted, sirens and all. With the bling era of rap all but over, and the trap epoch beginning to boom, Gibbs and Madlib proved that cocaine-infused bars need not be trivialised nor expressed over thumping 808s. It was a project that carved a new path in the ever-forking road of hip-hop.

With such success, it seemed likely that in the years that followed Piñata, both artists’ careers would follow an exponential trajectory. Indeed, talks of a second album, Bandana, had even begun by the time Piñatahad been released. Yet, come 2019, it was clear that neither had achieved such an explosion of fame, and it appeared that Bandanahad been shelved forever. For Madlib, the reason for his lingering status in the more niche spheres of hip-hop is clear enough: he does not desire the celebrity status. With classics under his belt, he feels no need to pursue the zeitgeist, instead allowing music that he finds intriguing to approach him. Gibbs is different. Like many other rappers who have escaped the hardships of desolating poverty, he has no qualms in expressing his pursuit of success. He is, by no means, a sell-out, but he is certainly more commercially visible than other underground rappers. Press runs, shows, and even the occasional trap beat, Gibbs is unabashedly aiming for the elusive crown. So why has he not reached this peak? Well, in June 2016, Gibbs was arrested on a European arrest warrant for a rape alleged to have taken place in Austria in 2015. Confined in a European jail for some time, he was later released after a judge determined there was not sufficient evidence. It is now believed that the accuser’s statement derived from a dream that she had had. The political and legal aspects aside, the incident had a deleterious effect not only on Gibbs’s psychological condition, but also on his career. As he told Ebro Darden last year, “when I came out of that situation, you know, I had to build my name back up, […] I feel like I just had to explain myself. ‘Cause it’s a lot of cats that get into those situations and they don’t speak on it; they don’t meet it head on because they’re actually guilty and they feel like they got something to hide.” 

In a number of striking albums, including You Only Live 2wice and Freddie, Gibbs addressed the situation directly, often revealing vulnerability, insecurity and trepidation even over the murkiest of trap beats. Despite these albums being continued exhibitions of lyrical prowess, they hardly furthered Gibbs’s bid as a member of hip-hop royalty. For that to happen, it became obvious that he would have to turn to his old partner, the Beat Konducta himself, Madlib. This time around, however, things have been radically changed.

If Madvillainyis both a musical and lyrical attempt to challenge the listener to keep up with the boundless rhymes and complex production, Bandanafeels like Madlib not only testing his audience, but his rapper too. He offers Gibbs some of his most impenetrable, multifarious and eclectic beats yet, rammed with beat switches, vocal samples and often murderous 808s. To think he made all these beats on his iPad. Happily, Gibbs passes with flying colours.

The same triumphant boasting is there, alongside the usually witty cultural references. Just think of his self-identification with Johnny Sacrimoni from The Sopranosin ‘Palmolive’, or Sugar Ray Robinson and John Wick in ‘Half Manne Half Cocaine’. But if you think this is all vapid showboating, rest assured, Gibbs’s lyrics have also developed a cutting, political edge. He announced in ‘Crushed Glass’ back in 2017 that “Donald Trump gon’ chain us up and turn back to slaves”, and his criticism of the president continues on Bandana. Gibbs’s ultimate preoccupation is with figures of black power, from Allen Iverson to Melvin Williams to Tupac himself. This is further enhanced by the revered selection of guests on this album. As spectacular as it is to hear Black Thought and Yasiin Bey on a Madlib beat, it is  in fact Pusha T that steals the show. Who else could rap “It was snowfall and Reagan gave me the visual, Obama opened his doors knowing I was a criminal” with such conviction, such assuredness and vigour. 

However, we all know that true classics need an element of emotional variation, a certain nuance that confirms them to be true depictions of the complex human psyche. Every ‘Ready to Die’ needs a ‘Suicidal Thoughts’, every ‘Illmatic’ needs a ‘Life’s a Bitch’, every ‘My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy’ needs a ‘Who Gon Survive In America’. Gibbs’s time in prison has hardened his determinations but softened his soul, stopping this album from becoming topically stale. No song typifies this struggle, this mental war, more than ‘Practice’, a song that, instrumentally speaking, lulls, ebbs and swoons and sets the stage for an expected tirade of misogyny. Subverting this expectation, however, Gibbs grants authority and knowledge to a woman he confesses to have cheated on, who tells him “you need to come home with your daughter, nothing more important than your baby”. He, in the next line, concedes that “drugs got me crazy”. The fact that Gibbs can depict his internal angst with the same lucid vividness with which he sketches his external battles with the law is a good sign. It shows that he is becoming more well-rounded, more precise and more transparent. If he continues in this vain, he may very soon find himself at the uppermost echelon of hip-hop. 

The perils of the high street: Zara’s polka dot dress.

0

I saw a viral tweet a couple of weeks ago that referred to how difficult it was to find anything worth buying in Zara. I found myself internally coming to the defence of, probably, my favourite high street shop. At least, it’s the only one I like looking in and the only one that I struggle to leave without having ‘accidentally’ acquired yet another item of clothing I simply do not need. Clothes shopping has a grip, unrivalled in its tightness, over me, as I’m sure it does over many others. The catch-all remedy to an endless list of ailments- and simultaneously the perfect means of celebrating a plethora of momentous occasions. But this pleasure is guilty; a naughty treat whose pick-me-up capacity is trumped by the self-hatred duly induced with every purchase. A further burden on the bank balance, on the planet and its depreciating resources, on a wardrobe creaking at the hinges. All so far from sparking joy. I need an urgent clear-out…did someone say summer sale?

The “new clothes=new me” belief is what keeps us running back to the fitting rooms for more; we buy again so as to be able to transform ourselves into a yet-unseen variant of the “me” of which we’re all too bored. Like a tattoo, minus penetration of the epidermis, plus the removability, clothes allow us a valuable outlet for characters and personalities often penned in by work and social norms. However, a problem I have always had with the high street big dogs is their emphasis on smaller bodies being better bodies and therefore more worth dressing. Also, that you’re setting yourself up, in shopping at Zara, Topshop, Urban Outfitters, for bumping into someone dressed identically to you. This phenomenon is the antithesis of dressing to express one’s individuality. By definition we are all unique, a fact undermined when a superficial clone of yourself appears at the neighbouring library desk. An obvious solution to this is to dress head-to-toe in charity shop wares. But the magnetism of the brand-new will continue to draw us towards the bigger, brighter and better advertised stores. It’s the relative thrill of custom-bought versus hand-me-downs which anyone with older siblings, cousins, friends will have experienced young. If it’s new for you, you’re special and will profit from greater caché on the climbing frame at primary school. It’s all about status and proving one’s wealth.

Yet when we’re all turning to the same select names for affordable, but not too affordable, trendy clothes, we’re bound to have intersecting taste. The Zara polka dot dress is today’s case in point. Instagram account Hot4theSpot is dedicated to exhibiting sightings of this sartorial sensation, securing its position as “the dress that conquered Britain”. Having escaped the sheltered confines of the provinces for a few days, I was able to test this claim among the inhabitants of our capital city. I counted up to ten sightings per day while I was there. Not a lot, but enough to confirm it as the most frequently occurring outfit on the London streets. Perhaps women everywhere have pounced on this polka dot piece because unlike a lot of Zara items, it is available in up to the equivalent of a UK size 18. I was frustrated to find while jean shopping in said shop last week that few styles exceed a size 14. Why, when the UK average is a 16? Obviously, then, curvier women will have embraced the opportunity to buy an item of clothing that legitimises their body shape. But why should they have to subscribe to looking like hundreds of other women in doing so? If the greater range of sizes in the polka dot dress is responsible for its take-over of epidemic proportions, then we need to see more items that dare to be bigger. The more choice there is for shoppers, with their unique requirements and styles, the more we’ll be able to savour our one-of-a-kind identities.

But in the mean time, maybe charity shops really are the safer option when it comes to protecting our personality as conveyed through clothing, not to mention the planet and our purses.

Review: Hustlers – ‘a refreshingly raw play’

“This was not a choice, this was a tragic accident.”

This is a refreshingly raw play to grace the theatres of Oxford. Set in the intimate BT studio, everything from the set to the dynamic cast of Hustlers conveyed the chaotic, destructive lifestyle of its eponymous main characters.

The play, set in the US during the 80s drug and AIDS crisis, depicts the lives of three prostitutes and their pimp, viscerally portraying the internalized disgust of the lives of those involved at all stages of the sex industry who live in a continuous cycle of drugs and poverty. Harlow, played by writer and director Lou Lou Curry, and James, played by Megan Ruppel, live under the toxic control of their pimp Tony, nicknamed ‘Trouble’, played by the talented Nichita Matei. The exploitative relationship between the pimp and the two female prostitutes is brought to light through the introduction of a new prostitute to the streets: a woman aptly named ‘Clarity’.

The character of Clarity reveals the danger of streets without ‘protection’, a suitable double entendre for the AIDS crisis of the 80s, and hints at the simultaneously abusive and co-dependent relationships of pimps and prostitutes. In particular, the physical theatre employed in the opening scenes between the two main characters Harlow and James was especially compelling, capturing a frenetic cycle of prostitution and drug-taking.

A standout performance of the show was that of Megan Ruppel, who played the transgender prostitute James. She managed to convey the fragility of prostitution and drug addiction without falling into clichés; certainly no mean feat given the complexity of the subject matter. Her monologues provided her with material that she took and ran with, providing the audience with a truly immersive performance. Her character’s portrayal of the nuances of being a transgender prostitute, changing himself for the businessmen and the average guy on the street, provided a unique insight into the depersonalisation of prostitutes.

The set itself was cleverly designed; the floor scattered with condoms (that have definitely resulted in the loss of one JCR’s welfare supply), heroin needles and cigarettes, the audience was provided with an immersive experience which captured the poverty of the characters well. Despite a few cliché lines, such as that the only things that humans fear are “death and taxes”, and a feeling that the lighting could be improved upon in part, the first performance of this new original play was a breath of fresh air for the Oxford theatre scene.

Review: The Witch of Edmonton – Elizabeth Sawyer’s story ‘is brought to the fore’

Hoof and Horn Productions’ take on Thomas Dekker, John Ford, and William Rowley’s play, The Witch of Edmonton, moves away from the original version’s focus on male characters. The subplots depicting the bigamist Frank Thorney, who murders his second wife, and Cuddy Banks (Tasha Saunders), who innocently attempts to befriend the devil-dog (Sam Gledhill), fade into the background or disappear entirely, in the case of Frank’s story. Bertie Harrison-Broninski and Felix Morrison’s adaptation of the 17th century play demonstrates a great awareness and sensitivity where the character of Elizabeth Sawyer (Lowri Spear) is concerned. Her story is brought to the fore through new additions to the text, which include monologues and instances of reflection around the muffling of female voices in the age of witch-burning.

The audience is immediately welcomed into a strange and uncomfortable world by Toby Stanford’s musical presence; a strange and occasionally dissonant melody floats around the room as the audience settles into their seats. This melody (an original composition by Stanford) slips in and out of every scene, often disappearing or reappearing imperceptibly. The stage is crafted into a decaying cabin, a prison cell, or a field with amazing attention to detail. Every inch of space is used, so that the low lighting of the edges of the stage and the contrasting brightly lit centre-stage become affective (and effective) tools for the cast to move in and out. The intelligent use of lighting, paired with Eve James’ fabulous set and costume design, creates a truly otherworldly glow around the characters on stage, as they oscillate between good and evil, temptation and shame.

Stanford’s keyboard playing provides an eerie backdrop to the whispering, growling, and shrieking of the characters who enter and leave the stage. Indeed, the cast do an incredible job of bringing to life different characters. Gledhill’s performance as Dog is particularly jarring. He embraces the role of the demonic canine companion with an incredible energy which transports him across the stage on all fours, growling out some truly terrifying lines as he coddles and manipulates Elizabeth. Furthermore, Fran Burt succeeds in transforming from the angry Old Banks (who makes a hobby out of beating old women with sticks) into the delicate and airy Ann Carter. Ann’s descent into madness is brilliantly illustrated by Burt’s recital of Sylvia Plath’s poem ‘Witch Burning’ in fragments and then as a whole after her character takes her own life. Olly Towarek (as Justice) and Emilka Cieslak (as Henry Goodcole) provide a counterpoint to Ann Carter, delivering strong performances of two characters who encapsulate the power of wrong beliefs, which can tempt normal people (just as well as devil-dog can) to commit atrocities.  

In addition to Cuddy Banks, Saunders plays a ghost tour guide named Henry Hollis. Her opening monologue plays in the background in the form of some kind of YouTube video project, setting the scene with an intense – verging on manic – energy as she stares down her audience throughout the shaky footage. While Saunders, her voice rising and falling, tells the stories of the allegedly haunted land around Edmonton, Mother Sawyer haunts the stage, creeping along the front row of spectators and making unflinching eye contact from beneath a blood-red hood. The ghost tour videos, interspersed throughout the play, add a more modern twist to the already multi-layered story of Elizabeth: yet another voice takes on her tale and, in turn, takes it from her. 

Henry Goodcole’s ‘pamphlet’, held up triumphantly at the end of the play as his “true and known” tale of Elizabeth Sawyer’s damning confession, is none other than Hoof and Horn Productions’ own leaflet for the play – a rather humorous and self-aware nod to their part in the legacy of men such as Goodcole, the original playwrights, and the vlogger Henry Hollis, whose voices have overshadowed or censored hers.

Review: Gatsby at Trinity – the ‘love for Trinity College and Fitzgerald’s novel is apparent’

0

On hearing about the staging of Ian Flintoff’s novel Gatsby at Trinity as this year’s Trinity Garden play, I was immediately impatient to see it. The word ‘Gatsby’ instantly arouses expectations of the glamorous, glitzy, and debauched world of Fitzgerald’s masterpiece The Great Gatsby, set in 1920s Jazz Age America.

Flintoff’s love for Trinity College and Fitzgerald’s novel is apparent as he seizes the opportunity to combine them in this play.  This prequel picks up on the details of Gatsby’s dubious past from the original novel, following his journey from Manhattan to Trinity College Oxford in the post-war year of 1919.  The pizzazz I had anticipated is not exactly what the play delivers: but by no means does that detract from the performance.

The dominant atmosphere of laid-back romanticism, with moments of poignancy in the aftermath of war, is fostered brilliantly by director Imogen Edwards-Lawrence.  Sitting on the Trinity lawn as the sun sets watching Gatsby learn cricket is certainly the tonic to a demanding student day.  Any other location would have been unable to cultivate the mood of the play quite like this one and the actors pointing out the multiple references to aspects of the college, like Chapel Quad, immerses the audience entirely into the world of the play.  Special mention must go to pianist Liam Gesoff who, playing for the whole twenty-minute interval, prevents the spell from being broken.   

Kevin Hulbutt (as the older Gatsby) and Alec Watson (as the younger Gatsby) had big shoes to fill, playing the mysterious and illusive protagonist in the wake of timeless portrayals by Robert Redford and Leonardo DiCaprio.   Hulbutt is consistently charming and engaging,  grabbing the audience’s attention and dominating the scene with his narrative speech.  He successfully presents the easy attitude of the character, lounging in various chairs located on the stage. Hulbutt portrays convincing nostalgia and intimacy when he speaks about Daisy and his comic timing when he assumed the role of a porter with a Cockney accent was excellent.  This is a role which allows Hulbutt to fully demonstrate his versatility as an actor and for which he deserves praise.

Watson gives us a very different side to Gatsby and he conveys the naivety of the American confused by the English culture both effectively and comically.  With less of the assumed ease of older Gatsby, Watson provides the audience with a window into young Gatsby’s state of mind as he debates on the philosophies of truth with his friend Madge, foreshadowing his later guise of deception. 

Leanne Yau and Monica Schroeder provided other highlights. Yau plays the intelligent, infatuated Madge, who acts as a stand-in love interest for Daisy, with great skill.  Her solo jazz song is refreshing and alluring, the lyrics of her song ‘Baby come home’ particularly poignant in this post-war age.  References to women’s rights within the college system, however, while historically relevant, seemed a little forced in the lines of Yang and others.  Nevertheless, Schroeder makes the excessively snobby friend Johnny Cusworth an excessively amusing character. 

That the script has been adapted from a novel is clear.  It is hard to translate the brief interactions Gatsby makes with the people he comes across onto the stage without it lacking a certain level of depth, and it can feel a little directionless as characters are constantly being introduced only to disappear.  Director Edwards-Lawrence deals well with what is a fault in the script by using the space to great advantage and so keeping the audience engaged.  It was a nice touch to see Olivia Popp, as Daisy, read her letters wistfully from a raised block upstage, while a bench elsewhere was transformed comically into a car by Watson and Schroeder bobbing up and down.  With a running time of 110 minutes and no real peaks and troughs of dramatic tension, however, the play could have benefitted from a cut in the script. 

All in all, while the production could be tightened up, I had a very pleasurable evening as the actors take us back a hundred years on a whirlwind tour of Oxford and to an age anticipating the debauchery of the Roaring Twenties. 

Preview: The Oxford Revue and Friends – ‘plenty of laugh-of-out moments’

0

I have somehow managed to go three years on the Oxford performance scene without seeing a single Oxford Revue sketch show. Shocking, I know. Not intentionally – just, like so many things, I’ve always taken for granted that they’ll be there. It’s for that reason I feel incredibly privileged to finally see them in action today, where four members of the Revue take on a dizzying array of sketches, scenarios, and characters. The actual Revue will showcase the talents of six members, along with a compère – “There’s actually only two men this year,” I’m told somewhat gleefully.

The Revue show in eighth week this term – The Oxford Revue and Friends – is an hour long, and split between the Oxford, Cambridge, and Durham comedy troupes – Cambridge and Durham will have a half-hour each, followed by Oxford for the final hour. It’s a lot of time to fill with a series of two-minute sketches, but the variety I see here leaves me with no doubt that they will be able to achieve it. I’m told that the different Revues don’t communicate when devising their work, but performing with each other multiple times a year has given them an idea of their individual styles, each bringing something slightly different to the table.

The first sketch I see introduces me to their unique, strangely surreal brand of humour – I’m told at the end it’s “Goldilocks and the Three Bears from the perspective of the porridge”, which answered my unspoken question as to what the hell was going on – and is swiftly followed by a catty visit to the zoo, replete with side-eye as a mother and father duo attempt to have an argument without alerting their baby (at least, until all pretence is lost in the final punchline).

One of my favourite segments is the scene of a reading group at the Church of “St Josephine the Wanton Whore”, featuring a dramatic reading of an excerpt from Fifty Shades of Grey and an in-depth analysis of its symbolism in a Christian light (including the fantastic transition “And then of course we have the clitoris”).

Elsewhere there are plenty of laugh-out-loud moments – a conversation between a hopeful pope-to-be and a minister gets a laugh from the off (“Mr Sin?” “It’s Cardinal Sin, actually”). But what I’m most impressed by is the characterisation present throughout all of the sketches without exception. Even when a snappy punchline isn’t forthcoming (although there’s plenty of those, don’t worry) there’s an incredible physicality which allows them to switch from spelling bee participant to swashbuckling swordsman at the drop of a hat.

With the diverse audience of the Playhouse in mind – with everything from locals to students to Cambridge and Durham supporters – the troupe have tried to create something for everyone, with a diverse range of humour. I’m promised snappy openers, longer form narrative, and satire amongst the sketches. It’s certainly audience-focused, but the troupe say that it’s good to challenge themselves with different material that might be a little out of their comfort zone. The Playhouse stage allows for more ambitious projects, including musical segments and an intriguing “multimedia project” which is mentioned a couple of times. Having seen the content of some of the sketches, I quite honestly dread to think – but whatever it is, I know it promises to be hugely entertaining.

Review: The Oxford Revue and Friends – ‘an unforgettable comedic experience’

0

The lights dimmed, silence descended over the audience, when suddenly – “WOOO!” – Sophia Goettke (of The Oxford Revue) burst onto the stage with a shout. She was to be our ‘compere’ for the evening, despite joking that she didn’t know what the word meant.

What followed was a short stand-up set, where Goettke played on the language of her German heritage to raucous laughter from the audience. Focusing on ‘relatable’ words, she introduced us to idioms such as ‘kummerspeck’, a personal favourite of mine, meaning to gain weight from sadness, and literally translated as ‘grief bacon.’ The fact that Goettke commanded both stage and audience solo is what made her performance particularly impressive. Her anecdotal style of comedy stood in refreshing contrast to the sketch comedy acts; and, in a show where so many characters were performed, allowed for key moments of personal connection with the audience.

First to be introduced by Goettke were The Durham Revue, represented by trio Charlie Billingham, Henrie Allen and Bob Howat. Their approach to sketch comedy was masterful, and elevated by the brilliance of their delivery. Particularly impressive were the ‘behind the scenes’ elements of their set. Explaining their intention, in “taking your expectations and having a little play”, the actors presented a number of scenarios which overturned the audience’s expectations to comedic effect. Calling it the ‘pull back and reveal’, one such scene saw Allen lying on top of Billingham suggestively, before explaining that they were actually demonstrating the relative densities of oil and water. It were moments like this, where the audience were invited to take a glimpse at the creation of comedy, that made this performance unique, and demonstrated the strong ability of the performers.

The stand out performance, however, comes from Bob Howat, in his reading from the autobiography of ‘Noo Noo’ (of Teletubbies fame). Surprisingly, Howat manages to take a comedic cliché (the dark reimagining of children’s television characters), and create something fresh. Not only is an addiction to snorting tubby custard exposed, but Dipsy (a RADA alumnus, apparently) has auditioned for the part of Rosencrantz in Hamlet and been rejected because of the television in his stomach. The Durham Revue proved themselves to be extremely able comedians, paving the way for the following acts with noticeable ease.

Next up were the famed Cambridge Footlights. Curating a set that was both varied and playful, the performers carried us through to the interval with a number of sketches, their subjects ranging from spies with funny names to the act of ordering breakfast in a restaurant. Some jokes unfortunately fell short, such as their ‘back in my day’ skit, which hinged on a punchline about the timelessness of Abercrombie and Fitch. The performance was also sometimes hampered by unclear dialogue, meaning that the audience lost out on key comedic points. Despite this, parts of their work shone out. Their ‘Fairtrade drugs’ advert was a particularly funny segment; as was their ‘voodoo-doll job interview’ (the punchline here being the mistaken identity of the doll). Overall, the performance was cleverly thought through, and had the potential to be more impressive in a more intimate setting, where sound issues could be reduced.

We had seen the friends, and now at last it was time for the main event: The Oxford Revue themselves. No topic was off-limits in this vivacious performance, which discussed (among other things) gun laws, anti-vaxxers, Zac Efron’s ‘sexy’ Ted Bundy; and of course, the latent biblical analogies in Fifty Shades of Gray. “After all”, says Tommy Hurst’s character, “he is called Christian.” The sheer variety and inventiveness of the set, bolstered by the superb comedic prowess of those on stage, culminated in an unforgettable comedic experience. Seriously: I’ll never think of Fifty Shades the same again.

These students are truly deserving of recognition for the time and effort they put into this performance. Whilst it isn’t a perfect science, the quality and polish they achieved onstage was rewarded by the obvious enjoyment of the audience. Stand out performances came from Mati and Jasmine, in their roles as bumbling first-date commentators. Finally, credit must be given to Hurst for baring (nearly) all in the final ‘naked sketch’ – a true dedication to his art.

Overall, the tone of the night was fun and light-hearted, providing the perfect antidote to post-finals existentialism. I just wish I could watch it again.

Review: Amélie The Musical – ‘a story of relentless optimism’

0

Despite being an avid fan of the 2001 film Amélie, you may be surprised to hear I did not go into this performance with high expectations. This UK tour, arriving in Oxford at the New Theatre, is based upon a 2015 Broadway production, which – with the exception of starring lady Phillipa Soo (Hamilton, anyone?) – was widely panned by critics.Whatever doubts I held in my head, they are undoubtedly gone by the close of the show. This is a production with heart.

The main criticism of the original Broadway production was, surprisingly, that it didn’t sound Parisian enough – perhaps surprising for a show whose main selling point over here has been its quirky French charm. This is a change which has certainly been rectified in this production, and it’s all for the better. French accents abound, which, despite occasionally causing the speech to lose clarity, is undeniably an improvement. This is a world filled with the sense of Montmartre, a whimsical atmosphere which carries all the quirkiness of the original. And, while I dread to think how the orgasm scene might appear to a new audience, it’s good to see that its references have been kept, none of the plot watered-down for the sake of glitzy musical glam.

Some of the greatest improvements have come with the score. The opening number of the show – ‘The flight of the blue fly’ sets up this dynamic beautifully, with a lone accordion player standing centre stage. Gradually, he is joined by other figures, and we see that these, too, are playing instruments on-stage – the characters become the orchestra, and their continual presence on the stage adds to the sense of street performance, each of the musicians themselves containing their own story.

The first half of the show sets up the exposition well – detailing each character’s tics and interconnections with summary verve – and a heart-warming act of goodwill provides one of the most touching moments of the show. Tragedy is lightly counterpoised with comedy, maintaining a careful balance. However, it is the second half in which the narrative really strides into its own, as the attention turns from the community the protagonist tries to help to Amélie herself, as she studiously avoids contact with the star-crossed Nico (Danny Mac, fresh from Strictly). The early-act ‘Halfway’ is a beautiful solo number, with Audrey Brisson appearing to play the piano live, while the eleventh-hour duet ‘Stay’ captures the show’s paradox beautifully – “Don’t come any closer but don’t move away” – with wonderful dual-layered staging capturing the tender moment to fantastic effect.

The directors have noted the difficulties of bringing Amélie to the stage: it is a narrative which defies musical convention, in which it is impossible to have your traditional ‘I want’ song as the protagonist, at least initially, doesn’t desire anything for herself; in which a large musical number is entirely out-of-keeping with the tone of the show. This doesn’t stop them from including a showstopping Act One number with an Elton John lookalike (don’t ask) and a Princess Diana daydream. Although this tune raises the roof, it’s in the quieter moments that the musical finds its true spirit.

The staging throughout is exceptional and inventive, with a lightshade transporting Amélie to her secluded cove and flashes of light. The young Amélie, previously portrayed by a child actress, is here replaced with a puppet, as is a surprisingly animated fish. The creative team must be commended for the fantastic set design which transports the audience from café to apartment to train, with all the streets of the city in-between. But aided by all of these elements, at its heart is a story of relentless optimism– and this is portrayed in such a touching, genuine manner, it is sure to stay with its audiences long after.

Review: How to Use a Washing Machine – ‘script and score are full of witticisms that are genuinely amusing’

0

Advertised as a “fresh, funny and frank new musical”, writer and director Georgie Botham achieves just that in her original work How to Use a Washing Machine which premiered at the North Wall Arts Centre this week before it heads to Theatre 503, the Greater Manchester Fringe and the Edinburgh Fringe Festival later this summer.

The play follows siblings James and Cass as they return to their childhood home after receiving their first real dose of adult life.  On the surface, these characters could not be more different.  James, the self-proclaimed “boring success” bickers consistently throughout the play with the sister he describes as an “arty failure”.  Packing up their childhood belongings exposes the similarities between the two, however, as they both lament unrealised dreams from their youth (becoming a ballet dancer for James and being a successful artist for Cass) and the struggles of adulthood. 

Perhaps it was opening-night jitters but the beginning was not as sharp as it could have been; at one point it was unclear if Cass was voicing the mother and some of the joint lines were a little out of time.  These are minor points though and the show quickly warmed up.  Both Moulton as Cass and Winter as James proceeded to fulfil the requirements of the roles and they should take pride in their convincing performances.  It is vital in a two-man musical consisting of dialogue, long monologues, solos and duets to have a cast that is strong and compelling both in terms of acting and singing.  Moulton and Winter demonstrated superbly not only the characters’ individual depth but also the many layers involved in a sibling relationship.  Beyond the basic level of verbal sparring and mocking (with Moulton singing at points in a babyish voice) a real sense of fun was established.  Sharing anecdotes, prompted by grabbing various items from a box, and dancing around the stage together lifted the pace successfully and the piggyback ride conveyed a still-present sibling juvenility.  Winter and Moulton also deserve credit for their tender moments in which the audience could palpably feel their intense care for one another.  Winter as James in particular demonstrated this through an earnest soliloquy in which the character reveals his “dullness” is to act as a steadying force for the unstable Cass.

The highlight of the show has to be the number after which the show is named.  Cass’s first solo song of ‘How Do You Use a Washing Machine?’ is fast-paced and chaotic just like the character.  The desperation of being incapable of getting to grips with this ‘adult thing’ is certainly relatable to students on the cusp of entering the real adult world.  Moulton injected the right energy into this song as the spunky and angsty Cass by interacting with the audience in a despairing bid to find out how to sort colours in the wash.  The decision to stage the musical in thrust was particularly fitting for this number and the use of a bubble machine was the cherry on the cake of an entertaining performance, with Cass running away from the soap bubbles of responsibility. 

It is often hard to strike the right tone in student comedy but Botham’s script and score are full of witticisms that are genuinely amusing and so the play maintains a light-hearted energy throughout.  Lines such as “Banker – reason why it rhymes with…” and the revelation that James and Cass’s dad is on Tinder provoked laughs from an amused audience.  The actors are accompanied by a talented string quartet and it suffices to say that the score created by Joe Winter enhances the changing moods perfectly.  A memorable instance comes in the transition between the overwhelming madness of Cass’s ‘How Do You Use a Washing Machine?’ song and James’s entrance; the fast-paced music slows and has a distinctly classical tone to fit with the “dull” character he has become.    

Although the plot was at times predictable and the anxieties of both characters exposed later in the play could have done with slightly more development, Botham’s musical is an enjoyable piece of theatre that I would recommend to anyone looking to spend a light-hearted hour.  I am confident that this will go down well at the Edinburgh Fringe and I wish SLAM Theatre’s production the best with their future runs.

What makes a good remake?

0

In recent years, there has been a trend in the film industry towards remakes. These have sometimes taken the shape of updating the casts and stories, particularly by swapping originally all-male main casts with female casts, such as in the fairly recent Ocean’s Eight, and the all-female remake of Ghostbusters. Disney in particular is currently churning out a slew of live-action remakes of classic animated films, from Mulan to The Little Mermaid. Most recently Disney’s The Lion King hit cinemas and was met with mediocre reviews, many criticising the fact that the film had nothing new or innovative to offer on the original 1994 film. From complete overhauls to animation updates, then, what is it that an audience actually want from a remake?

Remakes are not worth making unless the original franchise was successful, popular, and remains so with audiences, and thus remakes, by nature, are not judged solely as individual films, but by comparisons with their predecessors.  This introduces a problem for filmmakers as there is already a bar set for audience expectations. Studios must decide how closely they stick to the original film, and what elements must remain and which need updating, without upsetting audiences. This has, perhaps, been why many recent remakes have not received unanimous rave reviews; there will always be purists who do not like the changes, and there will also be those who welcome a change, something that is very much based on personal preference. Particularly with remakes which are made many decades after the original, there is also the issue of appealing to a new audience who may be less familiar with the originals, as well as appeasing older fans.

Judging by recent reviews, however, it does seem like audiences are keen for updates to their favourite films. The Lion King showed that simply reworking animation, no matter how impressive the new artwork is, is not enough to satisfy viewers. All-female cast films can also seem like studios are trying to bait audiences with diversity, when perhaps they should be focussing on offering new, fresh films to female leads. Indeed, all-female remake films often rely on their links to their previous films for popularity, with the result that the quality of the new release can suffer.

The new Men in Black: International was also met with a mediocre response, as the film attempted to update the cast, again by including more central female roles, but it fell short of audience expectations for a Men in Black film. Audiences are, generally, supportive of updates to films which bring them more in line with contemporary cultural values. However, this isn’t best shown by simply switching a cast. The success of films such as Black Panther show that increasing diversity in new films is just as, if not more, effective.

There is still a loyal following for remakes, comprised of original fans and those supportive of cast or style adjustments. However, it might be time for studios to stop sitting on their laurels and instead provide audiences with new and original releases which address issues such as diversity in their own right without relying on the popularity of older film franchises.