Friday 15th August 2025
Blog Page 660

Beautiful Boy review: powerful, painful, poignant

0

Beautiful Boy is based on the real-life experiences of David Sheff (Steve Carell) and his meth addicted son Nic (Timothée Chalamet). Van Groeningen and Davies’ screenplay combines both the father’s and the son’s memoirs, which allows Carell and Chalamet to bring genuine insight to their performances and provides access to their shared experiences and private sufferings.

The film eschews the superficial indie glamour of Trainspotting and Pulp Fiction with their charismatic cult-status characters. Beautiful Boy is unlikely to have an unintentional glamourising effect. We see Nic cooking meth and shooting up, his needle-scarred arms a visual reminder of the trauma he’s putting his body through. We witness the oblivion of being high before the inevitable crash down to a deeper and darker place. We see him debasing himself: stealing his little brother’s savings and from the family home to get money for drugs and near-death experiences of ODs and relapses after long periods of being clean. As Chalamet says, “it’s really an anti-glorification of drug use,” yet it is so much more than a public service advert.

The non-linear storytelling in Beautiful Boy scatters a selection of happy memories of David and Nic’s bonding – childhood adventures, surfing, and these lighten the lowest moments and show what they’ve lost.

The women in the Sheffs’ lives are somewhat side-lined and restricted to a few emotional scenes trying to support the fragile father and son. Despite telling both sides of the story simultaneously, the focus and framing of paternal control over the narrative supports Nic’s paranoid fears of David trying to control his life. Fear of failure and the tyranny of expectation are hinted at rather than spelled out.

At the heart of this story is the father/son relationship. Carell is comfortable in the scenes where he plays the concerned father trying to understand his son and his addiction. He worries about his own failure as a parent as well as his son’s failure to live up to his expectations. Chalamet’s performance is the emotional heart of the film. He expertly navigates the twisting mood-swings, paranoia and other psychological side effects of a meth addiction as well as the physical degradation.

The final scene is Nic crying in his father’s arms after his most catastrophic and near fatal overdose. We leave Nic at his lowest, which whilst not the most conventional way to end a movie, felt the most appropriate. The message that ‘relapse is part of recovery’ is reinforced throughout the film. To complain of repetition of the recovery-relapse structure doesn’t credit the nuance behind each break-down as the cycle constantly wears both Nic and his family down nearly destroying everything. In a particularly poignant scene in a narcotics anonymous meeting, a mother says that whilst her daughter has only just died, she’d been mourning for years. This strikes a chord as when Nic’s addiction spirals we see the family’s mourning commence through detaching themselves from him. We are denied the happy ending; there is hope, but the threat of relapse and disaster persists.

The film is a moving story of personal struggle and self-destruction shown within an affluent and seemingly happy family. Despite the bleakness of the film which focuses on the struggles to stay clean, the shame and regret of failing to do so, Chalamet wisely says, “It’s about the fracturing of the human spirit … And how that can still … be redeemed and saved.”

Behind the curtain of opera’s accessibility crisis

0

When most people hear the word ‘opera’, their mind is immediately flooded with a series of stereotypes: the fat Italian man belting out high notes like there’s no tomorrow, or the middle-aged, rotund soprano screaming her lungs out ten minutes after she was fatally wounded.

If asked to name an opera singer, most people can probably manage Maria Callas or Luciano Pavarotti. Challenge someone to name an opera singer still performing and the number of people who can find a name in the dark crevices of their mind drops even further.

Most strikingly of all, ask these same questions to university students, and you’ll likely be met with a sea of blank faces. Why then, does opera seem to be such a niche interest among the wider population, but especially among young people?

Opera as an art form is notoriously abnormal. For starters, its authenticity is compromised by the fact that it is sung in its entirety. Pile on top of this the duration of many performances, which require undeniably large amounts of concentration from its audience, and the fact that any English audience member is often going to be watching a performance in a foreign language, and it already seems slightly unappealing.

To make matters worse, the storylines tend to be either unbelievably complex, or based on mythology difficult to represent effectively on stage both with scenery and singers. Cio-Cio-San, for example, the lead role of Madama Butterfly, is meant to be fifteen years old. It is not uncommon for a woman almost thrice that age to be singing the role. The Rhinemaidens, another infamous example, are three water-nymphs who are supposedly submerged underwater in Wagner’s Ring Cycle.

After accounting for the millennial reputation for short-attention spans and the tendency for other art forms in the modern day to be hyper-realist, you have a recipe for disaster. Even the dragons in Game of Thrones, or British politicians for that matter, are more believable than the complex mythological plot of Mozart’s Die Zauberflöte.

But these abnormalities, if seen and embraced as part and parcel of the art form, can serve to enrich the opera-going experience. Much has been said about the aesthetics of opera, perhaps most notably by Wagner, who used the term ‘Gesamtskunstwerk’ (literally ‘total work of art’) to describe his understanding of opera as an art form. Unlike any other art form (except, nowadays, the modern musical), opera embraces theatre, music, and art in an unavoidable synthesis every time it is performed. For Wagner, the individuality of each art form was united in opera and subordinated to a common purpose of shedding light on the human experience.

Opera’s unification of mediums arguably allows these messages to be portrayed with greater complexity and detail than any other artform. The words sung carry their own meaning, but the true intent of their message can be reinforced, contradicted, or complicated by the music of the melody and of the orchestra. In Act two of Rigoletto for example, Rigoletto faces courtiers who have kidnapped his daughter and sings ‘la’ repetitively to a jolly tempo in an attempt to hide his dismay; yet the strings of the orchestra, in a minor key, reflect his underlying agony.

Add in the multitude of each performer’s ability to interpret, both dramatically and musically, the various roles played, and there is a vast level of meaning that can often go unnoticed because of the aforementioned issues. Despite its unbelievability, opera has the potential to be incredibly raw and human.

Issues with opera are not just restricted to what is performed on stage. Much of the lack of appeal, particularly for students, is the absurdly high ticket prices. To give you an example, I pay around £70 a year to be a Young Friend of the Royal Opera House which gives me early access to book tickets. Two seats in a less than optimal location to see La Traviata in January cost me £210. La Forza del Destino, the highlight of the spring season, had completely sold out by the time booking was opened to the general public. If you are so inclined as to become a First Night Patron of the Royal Opera House for a mere £16,094 per year, you have a guaranteed two ‘prime seats’ for the opening night of every production.

Combine this with the culture surrounding opera, and you have the main reasons why opera has come to be seen as an elitist art-form. Perhaps with the exception only of Shakespeare, there is no audience so renowned for its strongly (and sometimes stubbornly) held views as the opera audience. Still today (though mostly in Italy, where passions run slightly higher than the stiff upper lips of the Royal Opera House), singers can be booed off-stage mid-performance or productions halted mid-run because they do not satisfy the tastes of the ‘omniscient’ audience.

Unlike modern theatre, where new works are performed as the norm, opera seasons consist of the ‘repertory’; these dozens of operas, mostly from 19th and early 20th century composers (Verdi, Puccini, Rossini etc.), are repeated around the world every year. Thus, through repetition, the opera-goer expects certain opera to be performed in certain ways. Break this rule in the wrong opera house (La Scala in Milan is notorious for this) and the public backlash can be scathing.

The auditorium culture also reflects this elitism: complete silence is expected throughout the performance (apart from the occasional booing, of course) and if you are late or need to leave to go to the toilet, you are only allowed back to your seats after the interval. This exclusivity is also painfully evident in the costs of pursuing opera as a career. Unlike in normal theatre, there tend to be a maximum of two opera houses per city; consequently, auditions for Young Artist programs across Europe (often seen as a required stepping stone into becoming a ‘proper’ opera singer) can become extremely costly, involving flights to and from major European cities several times a year.

This is on top of the debt you will have accrued after an undergraduate degree or Bachelor of Music from a conservatoire, a master’s in music or vocal performance, regular singing lessons, performance workshops, and summer academies. Unfortunately, it is often a question of whose parents’ credit card is the most flexible, rather than a question of whose voice is the best. It is no wonder then, that opera has an elitist reputation.

More recently however, there has been some significant movement of the operatic tectonic plates, with many of these elitist aspects becoming seen as remnants of the past. Many opera houses across Europe and America have been trying bold new ideas to attract wider (with a focus on younger) audiences to the theatre. The Royal Opera House recently underwent a two-year renovation and is now open daily from 10am, with free lunchtime recitals from chorus members regularly each week. It hosts special performances for school children from disadvantaged backgrounds and has the Young Friends program with access to early booking and insider events at a discounted price for 16-25 year olds. The English Touring Opera travel around the country providing high quality opera performances practically on your doorstep.

The English National Opera (ENO) has enacted substantial reforms. For instance, it announced this December that Saturday-night tickets for under-18 year olds will be free; this allows the opera to be a family outing, not just a stressful evening for the parents who would otherwise have to worry about babysitting or reluctantly purchase a £50 ticket for their seven-year-old.

Moreover, the ENO has Opera Undressed nights at £20 for inexperienced opera-goers which includes a pre-performance talk, and has begun to offer a ‘secret-seat’ lottery whereby you pay a flat rate of £30 to ‘win’ a seat worth over £50 in an unknown location. Additionally, the ENO sings all productions in English to make it more accessible and has recently been casting more singers from BAME backgrounds; their website claims that a third of each nights’ audience have never been to an opera before.

There has also been a significant drive from within the opera singing community to make opera more accessible. The American tenor Michael Fabiano has consistently called for Opera houses to modernise their viewing experience, for instance by having a ‘mobile phones allowed’ section or specific performances where short video recordings are allowed – think of the Instagram potential!

Several opera houses have begun experimenting with more modern productions: a fairly recent production of Le Nozze di Figaro had the Count in a full Adidas tracksuit to highlight both his wealth, and the fact that he’s a bit of a clown. Websites like OperaVision have allowed for livestreams of opera to become regular occurrences and the world’s biggest opera houses have all signed up for their operas to be kept online for months after their initial livestream (because if there’s one business model to follow for success with young people, it’s Netflix).

The issue of a lack of modern repertory has also ruffled some feathers. How are operas meant to appeal to young audiences if they were written 200 years ago? Conrad Osborne, a prominent opera critic and writer, has spoken at length about the stagnation of the repertory. No operas from any later than the early 20th century are considered ‘repertory opera’, leading directors to push well-loved favourites to their conceptual limits. This attempt at innovation results in unbelievable or simply senseless productions;the Planet of the Apes inspired production of Rigoletto seems too far.

Personally, I think opera needs a return to its basics if it is to have a lasting impact on young audiences. Younger audiences will only return if they like what they see. That means not taking unrestricted liberties with the text: you wouldn’t see a Star Trek inspired Hamlet at the Royal Shakespeare Company, so why should a Harry Potter themed Magic Flute at the ENO fare any better? There’s a fine balance between a modern interpretation and a complete re-writing of an opera, the latter often having the potential to give a bad impression to any first-timers in the audience.

Drives to cast more BAME singers are extremely important, and there have been several drives put in place to tackle this issue since the late 1970s when famous sopranos like Leontyne Price began to emerge. World-class BAME opera singers like Pretty Yende are currently paving the way for a more inclusive environment in the future.

Yet with a growing number of such talented BAME singers, it is disappointing that some opera houses have started seeing inclusivity as a selling point, employing singers in roles out of their depth, rather than other singers of BAME or any other ethnic origin, better suited to the roles. The ENO in particular was criticised for doing this last season: looking at diversity as a selling point instead of genuinely attempting to promote it.

Moreover, it’s not enough to just sing the role. Opera is a performance, not a concert. Too many people have the image of the soprano on her death bed singing with perfect posture and as loud as she can, instead of resembling anything like a woman close to her death. Singers like Ermonela Jaho and Lisette Oropesa are good examples of the singing-acting combination that the realism-accustomed modern generation tend to prefer.

This recent change in the operatic world will all be for nothing though, if young people can’t afford to go and see the performances. There are several opera companies looking at making performances more accessible; for instance, the Oxford Opera Company had a performance of Carmen last term with tickets from £10-£35. Hopefully it won’t be long until bigger opera houses follow suit.

Opera is facing a tricky time in its long life. An elitist reputation, though fading, still no doubt dissuades many from visiting the opera. It is not a case of forcing opera into relevance and modernity – opera, like Shakespeare, is still relevant in the 21st century. It is just a case of noticing it. Be it professional or amateur, English or Italian, in London or abroad, I urge you to cast off any preconceptions you might have and go to a production. Hopefully, like me, you will agree with Maria Callas that “an opera begins long before the curtain comes up and ends long after it has come down.”

Still nothing moderate about Malaysia

0

In 2017, I wrote an article entitled ‘Nothing moderate about Malaysia’. It denounced the country-wide persecution of a local chapter of the group Atheist Republic.  After they posted a photo of their meeting online, many received death threats and were forced into hiding.

Whilst it is true that Malaysia is a diverse country that protects the rights of various religious groups, basic freedoms are frequently threatened by the state and the Sharia courts. Several states have egregious apostasy laws that threaten ‘rehabilitation’ and prison time for any Muslim that tries to leave the religion. It was for this reason that Dr Shahidan Kassim, a minister in the Prime Minister’s Office, wanted to identify whether there were any ‘official’ Muslims in the photo. 

“Not once does it [the constitution] mention atheism. This clearly shows that the group goes against the constitution and basic human rights… I suggest we vehemently hunt them down and identify them”, he said.  

Not only did the minister’s comments lack an understanding of human rights, they demonstrated an institutionalised acceptance of oppression. This was nearly two years ago, and since then a new prime minister has taken office. 

Prime Minister Mahathir bin Mohamad assumed office in May of last year, having previously served as prime minister from 1981 to 2003. His election was largely in response to the corruption and authoritarianism of the previous prime minister, Najib Razak, who has been charged with money laundering in connection with the infamous 1MDB scandal. 

Dr Mahathir has made some progress in fighting corruption and has promised to rejuvenate the rule of law in Malaysia. It was with this context in mind that I attended his talk at the Oxford Union last Friday evening. I was optimistic that the country’s political change had coincided with a liberalising of social attitudes. 

After a speech on the problems facing Malaysia, there was an extended period of questioning. Union President, Daniel Wilkinson, asked the prime minister about his ban on Israeli swimmers entering the country ahead of an upcoming Paralympic swimming tournament. 

Dr Mahathir replied: “In Malaysia we have no diplomatic relations with Israel at all, we don’t think that they should come to our country because we have no relations with them… A country has a right to keep its borders closed to certain people… We have borders to only allow people we like to come to Malaysia.” 

The PM refused to separate his racism towards Jewish people from his criticisms of the Israeli government. Wilkinson repeatedly pressed the prime minister on his racist remarks, but he was only met with nonchalance. His trite response that “the Arabs are all Semitic people” was a dismal attempt to conceal his deep-seated anti-Semitism.

He added: “Well it seems that most of them [Jews] support the stance taken by [Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu against the Arabs, so when I say only the Zionists, people do not understand. What they do understand is ‘yahudi’ or ‘Jews’.”

Wilkinson went on to question the PM on his claims that Jews are hook-nosed and have an instinctive sense of money. Dr Mahathir retorted that he is free to say what he likes, which garnered a gleeful applause from the audience. And yes, thankfully, Mahathir can express such opinions, for then we can see his views for what they are: lazy, hateful bigotry. 

The Union must be commended for hosting such an influential person, for scrutinising him thoroughly, and for enabling erudite questioners to expose his prejudice. Inviting a range of prominent people to the Union ensures that illiberal views are shown, with a little inspection, to be founded upon nothing but false beliefs and a hateful morality. 

Nowhere was this more evident than when one audience member asked: “Is sodomy wrong?” 

To which the prime minister replied: “In our society, it is wrong. If you want to do it yourself go ahead, but [do it] in England not in Malaysia.”

Writing this in St Peter’s College library, I can see the police patrolling the entrance to St Michael’s street. They are there to control the protests of Marion Maréchal’s talk at the Union – she’s a niece of Marine Le Pen. For the no-platforming, self-proclaimed anti-fascists it does beg the question, where was your protest on Friday evening?

Review: Antony and Cleopatra – a star-studded Shakespeare

0

Antony and Cleopatra is by no means a simple play. Shakespeare’s classical tale of love, war and empire spans over 42 scenes, which, if not managed properly, can easily lose the audience’s attention during its three and a half hour run time. However, this cannot be further from the case. As directed by Simon Godwin, this new truncated production is full of intense passion, touchingly tempered by sadness, where we have some of Shakespeare’s most sublime poetry.

The play is perfused with conflict: between public and private, the political and the personal. Godwin sees it as “not quite Romeo and Juliet and not quite Julius Caesar but a bit both”. It is then very fortunate that Ralph Fiennes and Sophie Okonedo were chosen for such demanding and nuanced title roles. Both won Evening Standard Theatre Awards for their performance, carrying the mantle of theatrical legends such as Anthony Hopkins and Judi Dench in the 1980s.

The action begins with the final scene as Octavius Caesar discovers Cleopatra’s lifeless body lying outstretched in her monument alongside her ill-fated lover. The all-encompassing darkness conveys to the audience a certain solemnity that can only be found in epic drama. It then retraces to Cleopatra’s Alexandrian palace where we discover Fiennes, loosely clad in a floral shirt with his belly displaying, revel in an air of touristy insouciance. The set is dominated by a tessellated aquamarine pool of Hildegard Bechtler’s design that would fit a boutique riad.

Okonedo, on the contrary, possesses all the radiance and confidence that one imagines the fabled ‘serpent of the Nile’ to have. In her opulent gown and flowing robes, she resembles at once a classical goddess and a cinematic star, with an untameable and fiery spirit — a queen with ‘infinite variety.’ “Cleopatra is the ultimate icon”, said Evie Gurney, the costume designer, who used contemporary cultural symbols such as Beyonce as inspiration. “My intention wasn’t to create something that looks like costume, but something that looks like high fashion.” Yet, amidst all this opulence, there is always the realisation that all this is not to last; they will never grow old together.

“A sense of failure hangs over the play,” says Godwin, and “and the trap is to play Antony like he’s a failure.” For the most part, Fiennes delivered a man of heroism and honour. As we break away from the luxurious Egypt to the austere Rome, Fiennes, too, temporarily shakes off his drunken stupor, self-indulgence and doting upon Cleopatra. We witness, as he manoeuvres with ease between the scheming Octavius and the senile Lepidus, the re-emergence of the tragic hero of the triumvirate we all root for. In one extended scene where each of the triumvirate puts on their military uniform in preparation for confronting Pompey, not a single word was uttered for two whole minutes. Instead, we were given a pulsating but dignified sequence of drum through which the unspoken pride of a once great man is made explicit.

Some half way into the first act, Fiennes sings a most moving song about old age that is not found in Shakespeare’s text. While I was enthralled by its melodious originality, I wonder if this has come too early in the play. Our hero contemplates his ‘heavy heart’ and ‘creaky knee’: has he admitted defeat to old age long before he admits defeat to Caesar? Where is the Antony who would cry “Come on, my queen; There’s sap in’t yet”? However, this portrayal of Antony as a man past his prime poignantly coincides with the actor Ralph Fiennes himself, who at the age of 56, might share a few of the same thoughts.

Okonedo’s Cleopatra matches the complexity of Antony with equal magnificence. Quick witted, capricious and passionate, she is a regal queen and more crucially, a woman very much in love. And she in love proved mad. She too suffers as duty calls Antony away from her. She too experiences the pangs of jealousy as she learns of Octavia, Antony’s newly wedded wife, and dumps the woeful messengers in her sunken pools. This makes her all the more relatable to us. In the lucid performance of Okonedo, we are reconciled with some of the seemingly irrational choices Antony and Cleopatra make: they are lovers intoxicated by their mutual adoration and tremulous desires. And for this, we may not even gently blame them. Her end comes in the form of an asp, which is substituted by a live milk snake, whose well-being is meticulously assured by members of the cast. If there is one criticism I would make of her, it is that she draws out her lines almost too much and too passionately at times, which does not allow the more tender feelings of her character to seep through. The result is that by the time of her death, a feeling of exhaustion creeps in.

Tim McMullan as Enobarbus and Katy Stephens as Agrippa give also particularly strong supporting performances. Fisayo Akinade, who played the hapless messenger, provided much of the comedy. Tunji Kasim, as Octavius Caesar, injected his youthful modernity into the play and in doing so, convincingly portrayed the scheming, ambitious politician who would defeat the great Mark Antony.

The National Theatre’s production of Antony and Cleopatra is one of those plays for which the stars have aligned. Featuring high-flying names such as Ralph Fiennes and Sophie Okonedo (and a live snake!), the play was bound to be a hit. As Antony says: [the play] “it is shaped, like it itself; and it is as broad as it hath breadth; it is just so high as it is” — in short, its pervading merits and occasional flaws characterise the production as one of the most original in decades.

Bhajis, bacteria, and bicycles: inside crew date kitchens

0

Oxford’s major crew date locations contravened multiple food hygiene regulations in their most recent inspections, Cherwell can reveal, with food storage, allergen risks, and dilapidated kitchens collectively the areas of greatest concern.

Cherwell obtained copies of the most recent hygiene food hygiene reports from At Thai, Jamal’s, and The Temple Lounge through Oxford City Council, all of which highlighted issues regarding hygiene, cleaning, and confidence in the restaurants’ management.

At Thai were found to be in breach of twelve legal requirements during their inspection in July last year. These included dirty hand contacts around the kitchen, concern about food being stored on the floor, as well as being chilled at 9°C in the walk-in fridge, which is higher than the permitted temperature in the UK. They were also instructed to deep clean their bin area and pest proof the restaurant, as well as being given six months to replace the kitchen floor, with the hygiene inspector describing it as “old, worn and cracked in places”.

Meanwhile Jamal’s on Walton Street, still known as Arzoo’s by many, breached seven legal requirements, with the inspector suggesting a cleaning of the walls and floors in the rear function room, as well as of their kitchen equipment. The same venue closed back in 2012 because of food hygiene concerns, though is now under new ownership. Both Jamal’s and At Thai were awarded an overall score of satisfactory.

The Temple Lounge in Cowley fared slightly better, receiving a four-star food hygiene rating, the same as the Randolph Hotel in its most recent report. Despite this, they were still told to remove their staircase carpet, with the inspector describing it as beyond cleaning. They were also instructed to deep clean and repaint the walls and ceiling in the kitchen.

Creasian on St. Giles came under fire for grease dripping from the kitchen canopy, which they were told to get professionally cleaned. The inspector also expressed concern about a bicycle in the kitchen. The restaurant has since ceased trading.

A representative of a renounced women’s drinking society told Cherwell:

“Although crew dates effectively pay to be rowdy, £15 should cover more than three naan breads and a bad curry. With white tablecloths to cover leftover food, uncomfortable chairs, and never enough cups or plates, the crew date scene is in dire need of an upgrade.”

 

The Race is on

0

When the editor commissioned a piece on whether Liverpool can win the Premier League, he phrased it so as to ask whether Liverpool will “slip up”. This exemplifies the eagerness with which rival fans await to seize on any mistake from Klopp’s men. Steven Gerrard’s infamous loss of footing five years ago is still glorified on the Chelsea terraces – the Blues finished third that season, behind Liverpool. It was Manchester City for whom the slip opened the door, and it is the oil-funded mega-club that the people are willing on once more as their collective champions against Liverpool.

This, however, is not the Liverpool of five years ago. The current table shows just ten goals conceded – this is a metamorphosis from the team that shipped fifty in 2013/14. Firepower at the other end has not been sacrificed; the departure of Suarez and decline of Sturridge has been mitigated through smart recruitment and coaching since Klopp took the helm. More than that, the team is truly collective this time: it is not solely reliant on one or two talismans. There are naturally standout members of the squad – Van Dijk is a colossus at one end, while Salah is a revelation at the other – but the side does not fall apart without them. This is a Liverpool team with both the depth and the quality of champions.

Liverpool, though, are not the only side to have undergone change in the last five years. In many other campaigns a team of their quality would have strolled to the title, but they must contend with the squad that last season were lauded by many as the best the league has ever seen. This title was not bestowed without reason: a world-class coach backed by effectively unending funds is a powerful combination, and the results have been, at time, mesmeric. De Bruyne, Bernardo Silva, David Silva: never has such creativity been assembled in one place. This guarantees service for Aguero, a consummate finisher who can now surely be considered a bona fide Premier League great. Vincent Kompany undoubtedly shares this status, yet he is not a certain starter ahead of John Stones and Aymeric Laporte. In goal, Ederson possesses all of the characteristics desirable in a modern keeper. There are still weak points: the system’s reliance on an ageing Fernandinho was exposed during his December absence through injury, and the full-backs are more adept going forward than they are at dealing with pressure. Nonetheless, this is substantially the same group that broke records for goals, points and wins last season – it is a formidable side that simply cannot be written off, even more so since their 2-1 win over Liverpool.

The fact that anyone can even compete with City would appear to be a victory for the league, particularly when the competitor is a side who in the not-so-distant past were replacing Luis Suarez with Lambert and Benteke. Rewind another few years, and Roy Hodgson was at the helm declaring Liverpool to be in a relegation battle. Surely this is a beacon of hope – good business and good coaching can take a club to the very top, even in the face of a squad funded by immense riches. And yet, while most fans would agree in principle, there is one sticking point: Liverpool. Away from the banks of the Mersey, the joy of getting carried away has been lost. Fans brand as “unbearable” those who eulogise about their team, who compose ballads about its achievements, who forge their very identity around its ethos. They point to the as-yet empty trophy cabinet under Klopp, and do not comprehend the notion of Liverpool fans enjoying the journey despite having not reached the destination. They fear the loss of this last remaining stick with which they can beat Klopp’s side more than they fear the monopolisation of the league.

As such, City are being willed on by the majority. They might get what they want: there is no shortage of quality at the Etihad, and the sheer amount of class at Guardiola’s disposal might yet prevail. Liverpool fans, however, have every right to believe that this won’t be the case – this will be their year. The forwards took all the plaudits in their run to Kyiv last year; Salah, Mane and Firmino are now supported by at least something of the strength in depth boasted by City. An end to the 30-year wait for the title is tangible. Even if it is not to be, however, the songs will not be silenced. The articles won’t stop. The fiercely loyal, socialist identity of the club and the city will not be shaken. Manchester City, the unlikely people’s champions, might stop Liverpool, but they will never shut them up.

Blues committee members vote on merger of women’s and men’s committees

0

Tonight, Blues committee members will vote on a potential merger of the currently separate men’s and women’s committees.

The presidents of the Women’s and Men’s Blues committees, Gwenyth Audran and Philip Baker respectively, proposed the merger in order to standardise the awarding of Blues status across women’s and men’s sport across the university. 

However, the presidents’ proposal is expected to meet opposition with captains of a number of teams signing a letter in opposition against the merger.

Writing in The Oxford Blue Bird, a website aiming to provide a “comprehensive coverage of all Oxford sporting matters”, Oxford University Rugby Football Club’s Women’s Blues Captain, Abby D’Cruz expressed her opposition against the merger.

She express her disapproval writing, “the lack of information, consultation, and due process afforded to the proposal has rendered the merger ill-equipped to recognise, much less address, the concerns of the committees it seeks to unite.”

The letter also took issue with the presidents writing, “given there are no fundamental differences between the male and female sports worlds at Oxford, it seems illogical to separate the organisations that help run them”, in a letter advocating for the merger.

D’Cruz wrote in response that this sentiment was “idealistic at best and irresponsible at worst”, citing examples of what she called “an institutional level of bias”, including the de-prioritisation of the scheduling and provisioning of referees for women’s football compared to men’s football.

The letter in opposition was co-signed by Oxford University Rugby Football Club’s Men’s Blues Captain, Oxford University Basketball Club’s Women’s Blues Captain, President of the Oxford University Athletic Club, Oxford University Women’s Boat Club’s Vice President and President of Oxford University Squash Raquets Club.

Another letter in opposition of the merger, which was published anonymously, stated that “it is only logical that the bodies that regulate the awarding of blues should be gender-specific” since “sport is fundamentally gender binary; it is predominantly played separately by men and women.”

The outcome of the vote will be released later tonight.

 

 

Crossing continents

1

In Europe and the United States, job openings for professors are scarce. In developing countries, on the other hand, there is a high demand for academics with PhDs to strengthen universities.

When my husband (from Ecuador, with a PhD from the USA) and I (Belgian, with a PhD from the Netherlands) were looking for a place to settle down, we thought our options through deeply.

Ecuador was an attractive option. The new rules for higher education institutions include, increasing the number of faculty members with PhDs at the Ecuadorian universities.

If you are a biologist, Ecuador is heaven for field work. The Galapagos, Amazon jungle, sweltering mangroves of the coast, and the snow-capped peaks of the Andean mountains host a variety of fauna and flora that make every biologist’s heart sing. It was not such an obvious choice for a structural engineer, never-the-less, I’ve found ways to advance my career, so here are seven tops for starting afresh in South America:

1. Pioneer

Don’t expect to find established labs. Instead, be prepared to pioneer and develop your own labs, fund your software licenses, and start your own ties to the industry. Learn to be the entrepreneur of your research career.

2. Teach beyond your university

Share the knowledge you obtain abroad. Offer to speak at industry events, to the broader public, at schools and at other universities. Bring attention to tpics that may be lacking in popularity, to raise concern.

3. Give back to local communities

Use the skills you learned during your studies to give back to your community at large. Volunteer for causes, with your technical knowledge – it is an element that is important for thee evaluation of the universities.

This is an excerpt of Seven tips for academics moving to Ecuador, originally published 22nd January 2018 on the Global Academy Jobs Blog.

Universities worldwide are recruiting now

Take the next step towards a distinguished career in academia at a top global university. With the latest vacancies from universities in 136 countries, Global Academy Jobs showcases the most sought-after academic opportunities . from over 600 institutions in five continents.

For diverse opportunities in your field, sign up for free with Global Academy Jobs today.

This is sponsored content.

Oxford bans donations from Chinese tech giant

The University has decided to not pursue new funding opportunities with Chinese tech giant Huawei and its related companies in response to spying allegations.

The University currently has two on-going projects with Huawei, with funding for both totalling £692,000. These projects were approved by the University prior to concerns being raised internationally.

The University decided to initiate the suspension on the 8 January and it will last at least three months. Oxford will continue with existing research contracts where funding has already been committed.

The telecommunications company has been accused by the US and others of spying on clients for the Chinese government and stealing trade secrets.

A spokesperson for the University told Cherwell: “Huawei has been notified of the decision, which the University will keep under review. The decision applies both to the funding of research contracts and of philanthropic donations.

“The decision has been taken in light of public concerns raised in recent months surrounding UK partnerships with Huawei. We hope these matters can be resolved shortly and note Huawei’s own willingness ot reassure governments about its role and activities.”

Oxford Chancellor Chris Patten warned MPs last week that China was attempting to exert a sway over Britain’s universities, highlighting Oxford’s particular vulnerabilities.

Giving evidence to the Foreign Affairs Select Committee, the former colonial governor of Hong Kong urged universities and government to remain vigilant against manipulative academic practices.

Chancellor Patten called for more collaboration between academics and the British state to counter Chinese influence: “[I]t would be very helpful if there was more agreement within Government about what is acceptable, and if there were a point of contact in Government to which all universities can turn.”

Chancellor Patten noted Oxford’s extensive involvement with the Chinese government, including the recently-opened research centre in Suzhou: “We have quite a few Chinese benefactors. Now we have a huge number of Chinese alumni because we have got over 1,300 Chinese postgraduate and undergraduate students at Oxford – more than most universities – and about 240 academic staff. This is a subject that we are really live to.”

Patten hinted that universities would be under greater financial pressure to accept foreign donations post-Brexit. He also highlighted the importance of donor transparency in countering such influence.

Patten described Confucius Institutes, Chinese government-funded cultural institutes attached to foreign universities, as “an offshoot of the propaganda department of the Communist party.”

He said: “If the Confucius Institute is working on a university campus as a contributor to Chinese language instruction, to understanding about the spectacular Chinese civilisation, that is fine. If it is trying to shape the curriculum, or shape students’ attitudes to Tibet, or Xinjiang, or free speech, or other issues like that, it is not acceptable.”

A spokesperson for the Chinese Embassy told Cherwell that the Confucius Institute “is a joint venture between a Chinese university and a foreign host university upon the latter’s application. The Chinese university respects the host’s right to make their decision in running the Institute and never interferes in academic freedom.

“The Confucius Institute is strictly for public good, focusing on mutual exchange and providing people with an opportunity to learn the Chinese language and culture, to strengthen educational and cultural cooperation, and to build friendships. The Institute has never participated in any activities in the host country that are political or religious in nature, and will not do so in the future.”

A spokesperson for the University stressed that Lord Patten’s comments were “applied to the higher education sector in general and he does not have specific concerns relating to Oxford.”

Huawei is under investigation int he US and facing a ban in Poland after an employee was charged with espionage. The governments of Australia and New Zealand have blocked the company’s involvement in their internet infrastructures, while Huawei’s Chief Financial Officer Sabrina Meng Wanzhou is currently detained in Canada awaiting extradition to the United States on charges of violating sanctions on Iran.

Other universities that have partnered with Huawei include Cambridge, Cardiff, York, Manchester, Edinburgh and Imperial College, London.

Oxford tutors among 104 signatories on anti-LGBTQ+ petition

0

Over a hundred serving Oxford clergy have signed a petition opposing a call by local bishops for “an attitude of inclusion and respect for LGBTQ+ people,” including staff from two Oxford colleges.

The petition questions whether those in same sex relationships should be eligible for ordination or communion, arguing that the Bible “discourages participation in the Lord’s Supper for those who have not examined themselves.”

Two members of Wycliffe Hall’s five-strong senior management team, Greg Downes and Justyn Terry, are among the signatories, along with five of the college’s tutors and lecturers: Andrew Atherstone, Bruce Gilling- ham, Simon Ponsonby, Michael Green and David Wenham.

St. Edmund Hall’s Chaplain and senior welfare officer Will Donaldson also signed the petition, along with Joel Knight, who oversees a congregation largely composed of Oxford students at St. Ebbe’s. The petition was also signed by rectors of St. Aldate’s and St. Ebbe’s churches, Charlie Cleverly and Vaughan Roberts.

The letter concludes with the signatories threatening to disassociate their churches from the Diocese. They write: “advocacy of same-sex sexual intimacy is either an expression of the love of God or it creates an obstacle to people entering the kingdom of God. It cannot be both.

“The situation is serious. If not addressed, we would all struggle to support the leadership of our bishops in this matter and a number of our churches may want to seek alternative means of receiving episcopal ministry, in recognition that your position is seriously differentiated from theirs. This would be a tragedy.”

The faith reps for Oxford University LGBTQ+ Society told Cherwell: “Whilst it is heartening that the letter-writers affirm that ‘no person is a problem or an issue’, we do not feel this is conveyed by the tone of the letter, which expresses ‘grave concern’, claims ‘the situation is seri- ous’, and says they are ‘disturbed’ by the Bishops’ words of inclusion.

“This kind of tone can have a detrimental effect on the atmosphere and attitudes which LGBTQ+ people experience, who are often already excluded or encouraged to reject their identities in some Christian communities.

“This is especially concerning given that several of the signatories are in pastoral roles in and around the university. LGBTQ+ Soc would like to urge anyone affected to get in touch with us: we’re here to support all LGBTQ+ students in Oxford, and offer a wide range of welfare-focused events, including those specifically targeted at LGBTQ+ people of faith.”

The four bishops of the Oxford diocese wrote to 1,500 ministers in October, announcing the formation of a new LGBTQ+ chaplaincy team and an informal LGBTQ+ advisory group.

The petition criticises the fact that this advisory group “does not include same-sex attracted people who advocate celibacy in faithfulness to Scripture.

“Overall, however, our overriding concern is with the direction of travel which the Diocese is taking as revealed by this letter.”

Quoting evangelical Bishop William Love, the authors write that the new LGBTQ+ guidance “does a great disservice and injustice to our gay and lesbian Brothers and Sisters in Christ, by leading them to believe that God gives his blessing to the sharing of sexual intimacy within a same-sex relationship, when in fact He has reserved the gift of sexual intimacy for men and women within the confines of marriage between a man and woman.”

The signatories write: “We entirely endorse the view that nobody should be told that their sexual orientation makes them an unsuitable candidate for leadership in the Church.”

However, they clarify that this does not include those who are sexually active, stating: “[I]n discussing leadership in the local church, the letter seeks to suggest that this should mean acceptance into leadership of those who identify themselves as LGBTQ+.

“This carries with it a range of understandings about what is appropriate by way of lifestyle. We cannot see how it is right to accept as Christian leaders those who advocate lifestyles that are not consistent with New Testament teaching.”

Arguing that those in same-sex relationships should be excluded from communion and ordination, the petition states: “The Letter makes specific reference to nobody being excluded or discouraged from receiving the sacraments of baptism or the Lord’s Supper. Such indiscriminate participation seems to be inconsistent with the witness of Scripture.”

One of the signatories, St. Ebbe’s Rector Vaughan Roberts, is celibate for this reason. He told Evangelicals Now: “The Bible presents only two alternatives: heterosexual marriage or celibacy,” arguing that “homo- sexual sin must always be resisted.”

The signatories write: “If we cannot clearly advocate God’s revealed will and encourage each other to repent, then we are ill-served by the Diocese.”

The chair of Oxford’s clergy Sue Booys described the petition’s signatories as an “unrepresentative fraction.” Speaking to Cherwell, she said: “My experience is that the Bishops’ pastoral letter has been widely appreciated in the Diocese.”

She continued: “On an issue like this one clergy are speak- ing personally and not for their parishes. For some people it has been distressing to see their clergy signing a letter with which they would not agree.

“The clergy and laity of our Diocese have confidence in the Bishop and his senior staff and are engaging warmly with our emerging missional strategy around the call to be more Christ-like through our Contemplative, Compassionate and Courageous lives in Church and Society.”

The bishops of Oxford, Reading, Dorchester and Buckingham also responded by clarifying that their original letter was “not intended as a theological statement [but rather] to commend love and care in the midst of a challenging period in the Church of England’s ongoing conversation on sexuality.”

The dispute comes amidst a row over Professor John Finnis’ homophobic views, which were the subject of a controversial student petition which garnered almost 600 signatures earlier this month. None of the signatories named in this article responded to a request for comment.