Saturday 7th June 2025
Blog Page 660

Milkman by Anna Burns: a pertinent portrait of life during the Troubles

0

Anna Burns’ Milkman (Faber & Faber), crowned the winner of this year’s Man Booker Prize on October 16th, made the Belfast-born author the first Northern Irish writer to win the prize. Praised by the judges for its “distinctive voice” and for being both “particularly and brilliantly universal”, the novel prevailed over the bookies’ favourites, Richard Powers’ eco-epic The Overstory (William Heinemann) and 27-year-old Daisy Johnson’s debut novel Everything Under (Jonathan Cape) to claim the £50,000 prize.The prestige attached to such an award, representing the pinnacle of literary success for many, certainly added to the novel’s allure when I saw it sitting on a shelf in Blackwell’s, proudly bearing this impressive title on its front-cover. But it was the rest of the front-cover that really piqued my curiosity. It combines a garish photograph of a sunset, which, for me, never fails to evoke a sense of the stereotypically sentimental, with a peculiarly impenetrable title written in a peculiarly plain font that seems to actively resist such sentimentality. It was this incongruity, which underscores the narrative’s own opacity, that convinced me to give the book a go.

Such opacity stems from Burns’ refusal to give just about anything a name in her novel. That the story is set in Northern Ireland during the Troubles is only apparent if one is familiar with either the country’s past or Burns’ background, with the conflict being ‘an enormous, immense occurrence’ in her life that ‘demands to be written about’, she told The Guardian. If not, the novel reads not so much as a reminiscence of a past world, but as a chilling, dystopian vision of the future. The story follows an eighteen-year-old girl, known simply as ‘middle sister’, who attracts the attention of a man called Milkman, a 41-year-old paramilitary predator who we soon learn “didn’t take milk orders”, “didn’t ever deliver milk” and “didn’t drive a milk lorry”. Allegedly having an affair with her stalker, the novel revolves around the potential damage that rumour can cause as our protagonist loses autonomy over her own story and, due in part to her habit of reading while walking, gets earmarked as a ‘beyond-the-pale’.

Her resignation in the face of such a loss of control, however, and indeed the wider sense of detachment that Burns’ matter-of-fact writing style evokes in even the most disturbing of moments, is what makes the novel so hard-hitting. In this society, violence is the norm. The prospect of Milkman planting a bomb under a vehicle of middle sister’s maybe-boyfriend, a car mechanic, leaves him completely unfazed. According to ‘longest friend’, it is preferable to be seen in public with Semtex, an explosive, over Jane Eyre, with the latter “unusual” and the former “to be expected”. But violence that is not motivated by politics is unthinkable; the murder of tablets girl, a mentally-unstable woman who poisons anyone, from strangers in nightclubs to her own sister, unsettles the neighbourhood more than the murder of innocent children and teenagers at the hands of the paramilitary. Compared to her two novels prior to Milkman, Burns tells The Guardian that this one is the most political: “As a writer, I think it is absolutely fascinating to explore that whole theme of borders and barriers and the dreaded other”, she says – and given the contentious questions that Brexit has raised regarding the Irish border, this discussion gives the novel, despite being written largely in 2014, a particular pertinence.

In a similar vein, the Booker’s chair of judges, Kwame Anthony Appiah, draws a link between the novel and the #MeToo movement, noting that it offers a “deep and subtle and morally and intellectually challenging picture of what #MeToo is about”. Whilst the story does not feature any physical sexual assault, middle sister feels that she will not be – and indeed is not – taken seriously if she opens up about the emotional abuse she is experiencing as a consequence of being stalked. This stance is hardly surprising, given that she herself struggles to believe that her stalker is doing anything wrong, supposing that abuse can only be legitimate if it is physical. Burns masterfully delineates a culture of silence surrounding sexual harassment that bleakly persists throughout the course of the novel, with no hope in sight for its being broken by the narrative’s close.

Despite the novel’s accidental relevance, the difficulty of Burns’ writing style seems to have proved a barrier to the enjoyment of some readers. Written in streams of consciousness, the narrative tends towards tangents, with the present moment capable of spawning many flashbacks and side-notes in a way that is highly Atwoodian, making it sometimes difficult to remember the scene you left behind originally. Milkman’s strange temporal looping also sees the opening sentence supply us with the ending: “The day Somebody McSomebody put a gun to my breast and called me a cat and threatened to shoot me was the same day the milkman died.” The novel is certainly more concerned with character than plot, ultimately utilising its well-wrought insights into the psychology of an eighteen-year-old girl to shine a light on the complex conditions of the society it depicts. Yet the plot by no means feels superfluous to this aim; on the contrary, its loose parameters give the space necessary for character development whilst still maintaining a satisfying framework through which to capture the interest and attention of a reader.

That the story is not especially plot-driven is perhaps what makes the plot twist with regards to the protagonist’s maybe-boyfriend near the end feel a little on the artificial side. Whilst the revelation is not at all implausible, it does read as an ad-hoc resolution intended to force their relationship out of the ‘maybe’ category in a way that felt too easy and neat. However, this hardly detracts from the cleverness of the novel as a whole. Its perceptive understanding of how an individual mind can be moulded by the social context it finds itself in; its inimitable, unforgiving and brutally blunt narrative voice; and its often-startling use of humour alongside all of its depressing depictions of suffering, collectively make Milkman a wonderfully unique, haunting read.

Research by Oxford University reveals scale of Russian intervention in US election

0

Research by Oxford University’s Computational Propaganda Project and network analysis firm Graphika has provided the most comprehensive analysis into Russia’s disinformation campaign around the 2016 US election.

According to the Washington Post, a draft of the report reveals the Russians to have targeted voters through social media to encourage them to elect Donald Trump.

The research is the first to study the millions of posts obtained by the Senate Intelligence Committee and offers new insights into how the Russian Internet Research Agency divided American voters into key interest groups in order to target them.

The Russian Internet Research Agency has previously been charged by US officials with criminal offences for interfering in the 2016 presidential campaign.

In 2017, social media companies such as Facebook, Google, and Twitter began to tighten up on known Russian accounts and provided the data used by the Oxford and Graphika researchers. This data covered several years, ending in mid-2017.

The report, which also analysed data provided separately to House Intelligence Committee members, does not take into its scope more recent political events, such as November’s midterm elections.

The draft obtained by the Washington Post reads: “What is clear is that all of the messaging clearly sought to benefit the Republican Party – and specifically Donald Trump.

“The main groups that could challenge Trump were then provided messaging that sought to confuse, distract and ultimately discourage members from voting.”

This research is the latest evidence that Russian agents aided Trump’s victory in 2016, reinforcing the conclusion of the US Intelligence Community’s 2017 report.

The data suggests the Russians made a particular effort to spur conservatives on issues such as gun control and immigration, while undermining the faith of African American voters by spreading misleading information about how to vote. Many other groups, including Latinos, Muslims, Christians, and members of the LGBTQ+ community were also targeted by Russians operating thousands of social media accounts.

Efforts to manipulate Americans increased year on year, spiking in 2016 and starting with accounts on Twitter, YouTube and Instagram, before targeting voters on Facebook too.

Facebook was especially effective at targeting conservatives and African Americans, the report said. Over 99% of all engagement came from 20 Russian-controlled Facebook pages, including ‘Heart of Texas’ and ‘Army of Jesus’.

The report also revealed that operatives began buying Google ads in order to promote ‘BlackMatters US’, a website with provocative messages such as, ‘Cops kill black kids. Are you sure your son won’t be next?’.

Oxford University and Graphika’s research adds to previously expressed concern about the overall threat social media poses to national politics, warning that many social media companies are now threats to democracy. 

Students face “hit” following ONS student loan reclassification

0

The Higher Education Policy Institute claims students could face a “triple whammy of fewer university places, less funding per student and tougher student loan repayment terms” after the Office for National Statistics announced a portion of student loans will be reclassified as government spending.

In the National Accounts, student loans are counted as government lending despite the fact that many graduates are not expected to repay their loans. From autumn 2019, this portion of student loans will be classified as government spending.

Although the cost of student loans to the government is unchanged, its reclassification will add an estimated additional £12bn to UK’s annual deficit.

Spokesperson for the HEPI, Nick Hillman, said: “Students are likely to get hit because they suddenly look much more costly to current taxpayers, while the extra income tax they will pay as graduates in the future continues to be ignored.”

The pressure on the government to reduce the deficit means that today’s announcement is likely to influence their post-18 education and funding review, which will be published in the New Year. Speculated changes to the higher education system have included a cap on student numbers and reduced tuition fees.

UCU head of policy and campaigns Matt Waddup said: “Successive governments’ funding reforms have done nothing but raise fees and student debt. It’s crucial that any future changes don’t reduce university funding or lock potential students out of learning. What we need is a new approach which recognises that higher education is a public good and should be funded through taxation, including an increased contribution from business.

“For too long one of the key beneficiaries of our higher education system has contributed too little. Businesses benefit from the pool of talented graduates from universities and it is only right they start to pay their fair share. The government should reverse its cuts to corporation tax and ringfence that money to fund universities.”

 

Varsity Ski Trip: a downhill slope?

0

With all the brightly coloured ski-jackets and loaded *soft-shell* suitcases streaming down Broad Street late on Friday of 8th week, it’s hard to curb the enthusiasm that emanates from this pilgrimage. But if anything can puncture the palpable excitement of a week’s skiing with your friends (AND the end of term), getting stuffed onto a musty old coach for twenty-something hours will do the trick. The coveted Varsity ski trip is full of these ups and downs, making you wonder whether it was all worth the money.

Indeed, the coach journey provides an immediate and rigorous test of your conviction: inevitably the student in front of you is that one person in the whole coach who has the audacity to lean their seat back, and the one sitting behind you has taken it upon themselves to eat Pringles as loudly as humanly possible. Yet rather than ever actually complaining, you huff passive-aggressively, stick your headphones in and try (unsuccessfully) to sleep. The rest of the journey is spent carefully rationing your rapidly dwindling data plan and short battery life, bemoaning the absence of a charging point, all the while dreaming of the experiences that lie ahead.

When you finally arrive at your destination, this year being Val Thorens, the late-evening sun glinting off the snow-capped mountains, your sense of optimism is restored. Everything from now on is going to be seamless and stress-free…then you find yourself in the ski-hire shop. Having endured the ceaseless queueing and the spikey glances of an agitated French store assistant, you are bundled off with your skis, ski poles, and ill-fitting boots, still querying if there’s actually any difference between the bronze, silver, gold and platinum options.

When you finally get on the slopes, you realise that skiing (great fun though it is) is almost entirely oriented around style. It’s all for show: skiers sashaying down the slope with over-exaggerated leg movements, pretending they’re not doing it just to impress those in the chairlifts that pass overhead. More confident skiers (effectively everyone) do away with helmets and goggles entirely, cruising down effortlessly in their Ray-Ban Clubmasters or their rave shades before après has even started.

Student skiing apparel appears to be afflicted by the paradox of wanting to stand out and be distinctive, but “only if there’s a group of us doing it”. By the end of the week there seems to be an official jacket for almost anything: NUCO rep jackets, college rep jackets, Ski Trip committee jackets, Oxford ski team jackets, Cambridge ski team jackets, college puffer jackets, and every other person wearing a North Face jacket. Even the festively worn Santa and elf costumes become a uniform of sorts. However, if miraculously you haven’t skied before and the slopes are a matter of survival rather than style, the whole ordeal is rendered rather embarrassing by all your friends who have been able to ski since before they could walk and treat the slopes like a catwalk. 

At least après offers some respite where you can let your hair down with your mates after a long day of skiing…right? Not if you’re standing next to some loon who enjoys moshing to house music in their ski boots and will claw your eyes out for a free snood.

In fact, you quickly find out that all the “free” t-shirts, food and drink are not at all free, but cost a painful, painful price. To win a prized varsity trip t-shirt you must somehow summon the power to rise, like a salmon, majestically from the frothing maelstrom, and pluck one from the sky as your competitors slash and rake at you from all sides. The food-and-drink queue, on the other hand, is as stern a test as any of your will and resolve to wait out a good deal of the afternoon for a soggy hot dog and half a cup of mulled wine. 

This may seem like a poor advertisement of the ski trip, but it’s just the same as any holiday isn’t it? There’s a lot of faff and most of the time you question whether all the money spent was worth it. But at the end of it all you choose to look back on the good moments, and even the bad moments become good memories…or at least amusing ones. 

Oxford University receives funding for research into potential benefits of AI

0

Oxford University has received a grant of over £1 million to aid research into the potential benefits of artificial intelligence to the legal sector.

PWC’s Annual Law Firms’ Survey 2018 revealed that 100% of Top 10 and 40% of Top 11-25 law firms have identified technology as the key challenge they face over the coming years.

82% of the Top 100 firms claimed they were either somewhat or extremely concerned about threats, making cyber security the third biggest concern as explored in this year’s survey, following Brexit (89%) and a lack of talent (84%).

The £1.2 million project, funded by the Economic and Social Research Council and led by Oxford University’s Law Faculty, explores the possibilities and restrictions of using AI in the legal sector in order to address such concerns.

Speaking to Grammarly, founder of the Marketing Artificial Intelligence Institute Paul Roetzer said: “As a whole, AI is so misunderstood that people almost have this sci-fi mentality.

“Like, that’s not real, the real stuff is these very narrow uses of AI that are built to be very specific things.”

Oxford University’s Law Faculty will work alongside a range of representatives from across the legal sector, including: international firms Slaughter and May and Allen & Over; media information firm Thomas Reuters; the Legal Education Foundation; lawtech start-up LexSnap; barristers from South Square Chambers; and the Law Society.

The initial stages of the project will explore the primary functions that AI could have in a law firm, including as conflict resolution, legal reasoning, and the comparison of skills training between the UK, USA, Hong Kong, and Singapore, as well as looking into how AI could be best used to emphasise governance and strategy in the workplace.

However, many firms remain concerned over the growth of technology and AI – 63% of firms surveyed by PWC stated they were either somewhat or extremely concerned over the speed of technological changes.

Between the hesitancy of some legal firms and growing concern over cyber safety in an industry where client security is imperative, it seems that the University’s research will prove vital in discovering the benefits of AI, and whether these outweigh the costs.

Michael Gove and Caroline Lucas to speak at the 2019 Oxford Farming Conference

0

Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs Secretary Michael Gove and Former Green Party leader Caroline Lucas have been announced as two of the most significant names on the list of speakers at the 2019 Oxford Farming Conference, held on the 2nd-4th January.

The three-day event, seeing speeches such as “The Future of Farm Trading” and to be held in Oxford’s Exam Schools building, will also see talks held by Barclays UK Chairman Sir Ian Cheshire, National Farmers Union President Minette Batters, Shadow Secretary for International Trade and Climate Change Barry Gardiner, and former New Zealand High Commissioner to the UK Sir Lockwood Smith.

Gove, an alumnus of Lady Margaret Hall and former President of the Oxford Union, is expected to talk to farmers on what he expects to be the future of farming in 2019 following his speech to the 2018 conference.

The final day of the conference will see a “A View from the City” of farming from Sir Ian Cheshire and Caroline Lucas’s “Radical Alternative for British Agriculture”.

The conference has also organised formal dinners for its attendants in the Colleges of Exeter, Christ Church, and Worcester, and will be hosted on Thursday 4th by the Oxford Union, who in honour of the conference have organised a debate under the motion: “This House believes the country would be better served if farmers focused on profits rather than public goods”.

The Oxford Farming Conference has heard speeches in previous years from New College’s Professor of Economic Policy Dieter Helm and former Rural Affairs Secretaries Andrea Leadsom and Liz Truss.

Frantz: a wrenching tale of remembrance

0

As we approach the 100 year mark since the end of World War I, many commemorative events have taken place. Cinema has had its own place in this remembrance.

Over the past few years, there has been a large number of highly successful films focusing on World War I or II, from Dunkirk to Darkest Hour to Journey’s End. The French-German film Frantz, however, has gone unnoticed by many English-speaking viewers, despite being one of the most powerful films released to explore the after-effects of World War I.

The majority of Frantz is set in a small German town, in mourning for the many young men it lost in the War. The film follows a young German widow, Anna (Paula Beer), and her encounter with a Frenchman, Adrien (Pierre Niney), who claims to have been friends with her husband before the war. Yet the elements of the relationship that Adrien conceals from Anna bubble beneath the surface of the film as it traverses both the dire relationship between Germany and France immediately after the war and the more intimate memories of loved ones left behind.

The appearance of Frenchman Adrien in the town is the source of much conflict, as he becomes a close friend and, in effect, a surrogate Frantz for Anna. The contempt with which Adrien is greeted by many of the town’s German residents due to his French nationality signifies the damaged Franco-German relationship as a whole, one that is certainly at its lowest point in Frantz and at times seems beyond repair.

The titular character is, à la Hitchcock, dead before the film begins. We only ever see Frantz in flashbacks, yet he manages to haunt everything about the film from its characters to its very title. The grief of the characters completely overwhelms them as Frantz becomes a figure that is all-consuming, despite his physical absence. In this way, director François Ozon emphasises how such mourning dominated life for an entire generation.

The ubiquity of loss is reflected in the sombre mood of the town. The quiet streets seem almost deserted and life seems to be incredibly monotonous and slow-paced. Ozon’s use of black and white to refer to the present and colour to refer to flashback scenes of life before the War is especially poignant. The colourful pre-war memories (which offer eye-opening revelations in themselves) contrast with the present to depict war’s capacity to strip away lives that seemed full-of-life and offer a darker world in its place. The sharp shadows created by the monochrome further reflect the brutality of life that war leaves in its wake.

The extreme, often violent, nationalism of both sides is captured in Ozon’s use of parallel scenes, one in Germany and one in France, in which citizens proudly sing their respective national anthems. The nationalistic lyrics of both and, in the French anthem, the blatant violence of them, signify a desire for revenge upon the ‘enemy’ even after the Armistice. As Anna sits in a French café surrounded by men chanting violent lyrics about killing foreign women, Ozon’s earlier depiction of the violence of the Germans against the French is deliberately brought to mind. Taken in the context of French soldiers’ letters exclaiming a desire to rape German women in revenge for their lost men, this scene of perverse sexual charge is especially difficult to watch.

Yet Frantz’s depiction of post-war trauma is only part of a larger attempt to commemorate World War I in its centenary year. Most significantly, Peter Jackson’s They Shall Not Grow Old ingeniously colourises old war footage to bring it to life. Black and white film creates an inevitable sense of disconnect between viewer and events, making it more difficult to relate to the individuals; they appear confined to the past and distant from our society today.  Jackson’s colourisation therefore adds an intense realism to the footage which enables a fresh look at the archival film. It allows us to feel more deeply connected with the individuals. We are reminded that the soldiers were people just like us and there seems to be an added level of humanity in this reminder. Jackson compels us to see and hear World War I just as the soldiers experienced it, a pivotal act for the commemoration and memorialisation of the War.

Film – both in the form of drama and documentary – is therefore a salient method of commemoration. Through cinema, we can connect with characters and become emotionally involved in their experience. We can gain a deeper understanding of what soldiers actually went through either through this empathetic engagement with character as seen in Frantz or the immediacy and tragic vitality of documentary footage as seen in They Shall Not Grow Old. In this centenary year, neither should be underestimated in their ability to provide a crucial insight into the War and its effects on soldiers, citizens, and international relations.

exhibit (a): The Art of Dressing

0

‘Is fashion art?’: The question has long been the subject of heated debate. The annual carousel of fashion weeks and seasonal collections, the economic focus of major houses’ offerings, and the limitations of wearability and the human form all mark it out from fine art. Particularly in the digital era, where fashion week attendees can scroll through and buy the looks on their smartphones immediately as the models walk past, shows seem more like a glorified trip to the shops than a fashion exhibition.

As fashion has become more commercialised, however, the last couple of years have given rise to a new opposing phenomenon. Retrospective exhibitions of fashion designers vie with those of traditional artists in the biggest museums across the globe: the Metropolitan Museum of Art’s 2011 exhibition Alexander McQueen: Savage Beauty, surpassed exhibits of ‘traditional’ art in its popularity, almost unparalleled in the museum’s history.

These exhibitions are also being monumentalised in museums entirely devoted to fashion houses and designers. The FondationLouis Vuitton in Paris opened its doors in 2014, while a museum dedicated to the work of Yves Saint Laurent was created in Marrakech earlier this year.

These developments in the appreciation of fashion suggest a different side to the fast-paced short-lived industry: one of devotion, dedication and homage to the vision of the designers and the beauty of their creations.

But can fashion truly occupy the same cultural space as art? Inspired by Cecil Beaton’s 1950s shots of models in front of classical sculptures, which invited connections between sartorial and artistic creativity, we took to the Ashmolean to find out. In an homage to European art dating from the Renaissance to the Baroque and Romantic periods, the rich colours and luscious textures of the paintings were highlighted by jewel-coloured velvets and satin sheens. Simple heavy jewellery and classical make up referenced portraiture of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries.

Although the hushed, richly-coloured galleries, polished floors and heavy gilded frames of the Ashmolean cultivate an atmosphere of devotion and reverence, our experience had anything but. We experimented with sprawling, casual poses which juxtaposed with staged portraiture and majestic vista paintings, yet also had some more stylised shots, as if the models were exhibits themselves.

Bags scattered across the floors, photographer sprawled on the grand staircase in order to ‘get the angle’, repeated warnings from museum attendants not to touch that, or sit there, and frequent pauses to allow tourists through don’t exactly reflect the atmosphere of homage and reverence we were questioning fashion’s place in.

Credit

Article & Styling: Lara Drew
Photography: Skye Humbert
Models: Chibi Auerbach, Phoebe Mallinson

Recipe: Mull with OJ, spice and all things nice

0

Congratulations, you’ve discovered the collection of secret ingredients to make your mull better than ever before!

The internet will tell you to use sugar, a pricey spice-kit, wine, and perhaps a bit of lemon zest. But here’s some alternative top-tips (and a little about why they’re tip-top):

1.  The OJ.

Citrus flavours are classic in mull, but popular recipes often don’t include it. I suggest using orange juice and raisins (or sultanas) instead of sugar – it’ll taste more natural and fruity than sugar. Let OJ add a citrus flavour to your drink, changing it from a deep red to a wonderful purply opaque colour. 

And what’s best, it’s cheap; orange juice from concentrate is actually better than fresh for mulled wine, because you want to get as much flavour as possible. Start with just a splash, and taste-test your way to deliciousness! You could even try it with 50:50 – I recently made a mull with two bottles of red wine and about 500ml conc. OJ, which seemed a bit too much at the time. It was still delicious, but very orangey. 

2.  Tea!

How nice to find that such a British classic actually goes swimmingly in a mull. Think of the bitter savoury taste of black-tea-leaves, and how that will add a depth and edge to your mull. You don’t want a sugary, orangey liquid. No, you want a full-bodied, aromatic mull which gets people going ‘mmm’ and ‘aah’. The key here is tea. Brew a cup of your everyday tea and extract those tannins. This helps make the mull acidic enough to match and blend with the sugars you’ve got bubbling away.

3.  Cloves.

For those of you who don’t know, cloves are “the aromatic flower buds of a tree in the family Myrtaceae, Syzygium aromaticum” (thanks, Google). They’re about one centimetre long, black and shaped like a fat grain of rice with a little ball on the end. And, they pack quite a punch – Spiceography names them ‘one of the world’s most powerful flavours’!

Cloves are pungent, strong and have a wonderful warmth to them (hopefully you can see by now that these are the perfect qualities for a nice warming mull). Again, try adding just a couple and add more if you like the flavour kick they provide. Unfortunately, solid cloves will take a long while, maybe an hour, for their flavour to seep out. So, if you don’t mind the grit, use ground cloves.

4.  More spice!

Following cloves, I want to do a shout-out to cinnamon sticks, star-anise and nutmeg. We’ve talked about taste, so let’s talk about looks. The final, crucial ingredients for your mull are all the spices you want (I recommend you try allspice and cumin). The necessary cinnamon and star anise are especially great, because you can buy solid ones and they’re festive and pretty. When you’re aiming to impress, serve a glass of mull with a slice of orange, a cinnamon stick and a star anise floating in it. Then grate some fresh nutmeg on top of each steaming cup! Perfect.

Your kitchen now smells amazing and everybody who gets to drink some is overcome with love for you.

For those of you who don’t feel like getting merry, mulled apple juice is just as delicious as mulled wine. It might take a long time, but it’s absolutely worth it. Apple juice, cinnamon, star anise… maybe some ground ginger? Cloves if you want, and leave it to brew for a long time, ‘till you love the smell and taste. There you go, you’re welcome.

Nuffield students defend Noah Carl after “racist pseudoscience” petition

4

Three Nuffield PhD students have signed a letter defending the former Nuffield fellow Noah Carl, after he was denounced in a petition signed by hundreds of academics.

The three politics students alleged that the petition against Noah Carl was a threat to academic freedom.

In a letter to the editor of the Times, they wrote: “We are not writing to corroborate Dr Carl’s conclusions. We are simply concerned by the use of popular opinion as the arbiter of truth. This is dangerous.

“The letter’s signatories may be experts in their own fields but they do not have the subject expertise to judge Dr Carl’s research. That responsibility falls to peer review.”

Other Nuffield students have expressed support for the petition, arguing that Carl’s work is both of poor quality and likely to provoke racism.

One Nuffield student told Cherwell: “He absolutely is not uncovering uncomfortable truths. He wouldn’t know how to do that.”

Noah Carl, who is now a fellow at St. Edmund’s, Cambridge, has faced calls for his removal for what the petition describes as “ethically suspect and methodologically flawed” research into the connection between race and criminality and his connections to the far-right through the London Conference on Intelligence.

The three Nuffield PhD students, writing in the Times, said: “A young researcher’s career and reputation are at stake; the bar should surely be higher than innuendo in an online letter that anyone can sign.”

A second Nuffield student who spoke to Cherwell said that Carl’s time at the College had left a legacy of “tension and bitterness.”

The first-year student told Cherwell: “Nuffield has proved to be an alienating and deeply divided social science research community, in part because of the legacy of Noah Carl and continued support for him and his racist work amongst a vocal minority of the student body (though not, to my knowledge, amongst Nuffield academics).

“I know many students who just try to avoid college life as much as possible because of this culture of acceptance, or at the very least tolerance, of far-right politics.”

JCR President of Nuffield College, Matthias Haslberger told Cherwell: “No complaints about Noah Carl were made to me. Noah ceased to be a member of the JCR in the summer of 2017 when he graduated and started his postdoc.”

Articles written in defence of the researcher have also appeared in the Spectator, Quillette, Spiked, the National ReviewBreitbart, and the Daily Wire.

23/12/2018 Correction: The article formerly read that “The JCR President did not respond to a request for comment”. However, the President had not been successfully contacted at the time.