Wednesday 16th July 2025
Blog Page 705

Things to do in September

0

One of Oxford’s more likeable features is its start date.  You’ve come back from your trips of self-discovery around Thailand, your friends are nervously disappearing off to their respective freshers’ weeks around the country but you’ve got a month left. How are you going to survive the time, battling off both feelings of excitement and nerves?

Fear not, we’ve got a list.

The Work

I’m afraid this one is somewhat inevitable. No doubt by now you’ve been sent at least one hastily written, informal email by a tutor suggesting a distressingly large reading list. There’s no need to tire yourself out too early at this point – don’t waste late nights and early mornings reading everything you’ve ever heard of before you even get here. Even so, crucially, Oxford term-time is about staying above water. They’ll be essays, partying, heart-ache, working out how the bloody washing-machine works. You won’t have infinite time to study all the things you might want (or indeed need) in a very compact 8 week term. So get a base of knowledge down while you’ve got the time – you never know, you might even end up enjoying some of it.

Hit the shops

Nothing cures the soul like retail therapy. Grab yourself the perfect interior design features for your room. Worried about your cooking abilities for the year? Boom, get yourself a kettle and you’re set for instant ramen all year.  Want to spice up your room with minimal effort and knowledge, and express your distressingly vanilla personality? Famous movie posters are for you (extra points if you haven’t even seen the movie). Concerned you won’t come across as keen enough in your first lecture? Get yourself some of those sweet binders, file dividers, notepads and a full set of coloured pens. It’s like year 7 all over again.

The possibilities are endless.

Get some parental knowledge

The thought of doing the dishes and making your own bed making you queasy?

You’ve proved yourself in the exam hall, now it’s time to prove yourself in the real world. Time for some proper learning. The best source of this? Parents. After all, they’ll probably miss you while you’re away, so they’ll appreciate the time you spend with them before you head off (even if it’s only long enough to ask about whether it’s safe to reheat takeaway rice or how insurance actually works).

Facebook investigation 

In just a month’s time, you’ll be meeting people who will become your life-long friends.

Don’t. Come. Unprepared.

Rebecca is into slam-poetry and rosé? If that’s your thing, solid friend material right there. Alex runs an Instagram account for his dog? Cool, I guess? Maybe you’ll bond over a lifelong passion for Chihuahuas? Harry posts inspirational quotes and pictures of his workout routine? Probably best to avoid…

It’s only a bit of fun, but may offer some vital talking points when Freshers’ Week hits.

Prepare your Freshers’ Week spiel

You’re going to be meeting a lot of people in the immediate future, and that means an endless number of introductions. Want to nonchalantly drop your super sweet banking internship or springboard into conversation? You’d better practise that until it’s needle-sharp and effortless (also, maybe, don’t do that).

Not to mention the dreaded group introductions/ speed friending your college might be unlucky enough to host. What is your surprising fact about yourself? What fruit would you be if you had to pick? Worth having a think about.

In all seriousness, though, ‘reinventing yourself’ for university is almost always a bad plan. Fill your September with packing, excitement, and as little panic as possible. Turn up being yourself, nothing more or less, and you’ll fit right in.

In Defence of Double Denim

0

Andy Warhol was famously quoted as saying “I want to die with my blue jeans on.” After all, what’s not to love to death about denim? It’s expressive, sexy, simple and looks great on (nearly) everyone. Originally the choice of cowboys and working folk, jeans were appropriated by 60s counter-culture before gradually establishing themselves as a universal wardrobe essential. We can all agree that denim is a must, yet nothing seems more divisive in Britain than questions surrounding the modishness of double denim (clearly nobody gives a toss about Brexit anymore).

Many who have embraced the trend are well aware of the stigma attached to such a decision; many Brits regard the ‘Canadian tuxedo’, as it’s known across the pond, about as trendy as socks and sandals. Yet as influencers have shown in recent months, double denim is set to be the gift that keeps on giving.

So why does a double dose of denim cause us so much anxiety? Perhaps the self-conscious British psyche fears regressing back to the days of tasteless 90s grunge. For many, double-d is a dark chapter in the story of fashion that should be consigned, alongside velour tracksuits and frosted tips, to the ash heap of history. Although we maintain a warm nostalgia for past fads, we are often wary of repeating them. Surely this justifies a more contemporary style of double denim as opposed to its complete abandonment! Whilst poorly matched and ill-fitting denim adorned with diamantes or studs is naturally hard to swallow, a more nuanced and tasteful ‘Canadian tux’ is very much on trend.

On the continent, we seem one of the last nations to embrace the style; apparently Germans don’t always wear lederhosen. Having visited Berlin, Rome and Prague in the last year, I can confirm that double denim is very much alive and well among Europe’s young cosmopolitan elite. Seemingly, a spectre is haunting Europe – the spectre of double denim (if only Marx had written fashion!). If we want to keep up with our progressive European counterparts, it looks like we’re going to have to bite the bullet. Or leave…

However, that’s not to say there aren’t rules! Firstly, the denim must be an exact colour match or alternatively the trousers should be distinctly darker than the jacket. Double denim needs to be deliberate to look good – rather than looking like you can’t be bothered to do the laundry or got dressed without the lights on. Secondly, the jeans and jacket should be relatively plain. Intense acid wash, studs, big rips, and diamantes are far too garish and, quite frankly, tacky. Double denim is quite enough of a statement without looking like you’ve joined the Sex Pistols. Finally, and arguably most importantly, double denim has to be worn with confidence.

In the last few months Gigi Hadid, as might be expected, has shown a classy take on double denim that is both chic and exciting. Effortlessly combining high-waisted jeans with flattering crops, Gigi has hurled double denim back into the limelight. Meanwhile, Nick Jonas’ ill-matching (and ill-fitting) double denim was brash and aesthetically unpleasant. Clearly a statement no one’s ready to hear. Then, lest we ever forget, there’s Justin and Britney…need I say more?

Get it right, and the rewards are obvious. Double denim, worn well, looks good. Denim jackets are comfy, practical, and don’t deserve to be neglected for fear of being unfashionable. They give a rugged and youthful look that is unfailingly trendy. Likewise, double denim is such an obvious statement it imbues the wearer with a quiet confidence that can only be a good thing. As I always say: double the denim, double the confidence.

So there we go: it’s the dream team. Next time you spot that denim jacket that hasn’t seen the light of day for years, match it with the right jeans and you’re bound to have a better day because of it. Double denim is back on trend and it’s here to stay. A quick (slightly ominous) warning: get it wrong and you look like you’re about to go chasing rabbits with Lennie and George. Get it right and you not only look great, you feel great. Perhaps if Mr Warhol were still alive (if you’ll pardon the morbidity), he might have thought about doubling up his denim before he passed.

 

Crazy Rich Asians – it’s not just a film

0

A lot has been said about the new blockbuster Crazy Rich Asians. Whilst the film has been flooded with praise centred around its ground-breaking representation of Asian-Americans in the traditionally white and Western-centric entertainment industry, it has also been subject to damning criticism over its erasure of non-Chinese minorities, its excessive glorification of wealth against a socioeconomically stratified Singapore and its casting decisions. However, independent of the film’s merits and drawbacks, the discussion it has provoked is exemplar of how pop culture can shape sociocultural dialogue.

Firstly, the polarised public reception towards Crazy Rich Asians aptly encapsulates the fact that one’s perceptions are greatly shaped by the context in which one lives or grows up. I’ve had Australian-Chinese friends on my Facebook newsfeed describe the opportunity to watch a Western production about Asian immigrants, delivered with cultural nuances and Chinese subtleties in place of the stale tropes, as an innately empowering experience.

Yet – as rightly noted by critics such as Sangeetha Thanapal – this observation neglects the lived experiences of ethnic minorities in Singapore, whose representation in the film varies from entrenched stereotypes to nothing at all. Additionally, Crazy Rich Asians captures only a monotonic impression of the immigrant experience by simply appealing to the alternative Western stereotypes of Chinese affluent families as both ‘conservative’ and ‘classist’ in how they appraise human relationships.

Whilst some individuals can deeply relate to the film, others feel alienated and misrepresented by it. Both responses are perfectly legitimate; rather than seeing Crazy Rich Asians as monolithically positive or negative, we are better off recognising it as simultaneously empowering and disempowering.

Secondly, the debate surrounding Crazy Rich Asians has significantly raised the profile of frequently disregarded social issues. Whilst activist discourse may struggle to reach politically apathetic members of the public, the recent fad for Crazy Rich Asians has given alienated minority groups a platform to denounce the institutional racism confronting minorities in Singapore.

Mainstream media outlets have been incentivised to publicise these voices of dissent towards Crazy Rich Asians to demonstrate ideological balance and differentiate their coverage of the film. The erroneous stereotypes in the film serve as visual embodiments of misrepresentation and non-representation, providing activists with prominent examples of how cultural erasure is perpetuated in popular culture.

Thirdly, the critique of Crazy Rich Asians has been pivotal in highlighting that non-representation can be just as bad as misrepresentation. The most common defence of the film against criticism over its presentation of minority groups is this: “It’s just one story about one aspect of Singaporean society – the Chinese experience. There is no reason why it ought to portray all ethnicities equally, if at all.”

This argument might have had some traction if the film directors had not chosen to cast ethnic minority members in largely stereotypical menial roles such as security guards and cleaners. In doing so, Crazy Rich Asians gives off the impression of being willing to offer representation to non-Chinese ethnic minorities whilst simultaneously perpetuating harmful stereotypes about them.

Yet even if we were to overlook the overt misrepresentation within the film, we ought to recognise that non-representation can itself be a form of misrepresentation. Its very title, Crazy Rich Asians, claims that the film is a story about ‘Asians’; yet this, when coupled with the apparent exclusion of most non-Chinese Asians from the storyline, transforms the seemingly harmless omission of non-Chinese individuals into an actively pernicious form of cultural erasure.

For many foreign audiences whose first impressions of Singapore may well be heavily shaped by watching the film, Crazy Rich Asians offers a prominent image of what Singapore looks like. Given this, the non-representation of ethnic minorities frames them, if not out of perceived existence, then at the very least as unimportant or secondary components of Singaporean society. In this way, the discussion provoked by the film’s release serves as a timely reminder that those who embrace greater representation on the big screen should not forget those who are left behind through non-representation.

Ultimately, it’s not my place to judge whether Crazy Rich Asians has on balance had a positive or negative societal impact. However, the sociocultural dialogue sparked by the film’s release highlights that whilst a work of art can be deeply flawed, discussion about that work, particularly regarding its interaction with wider society, may prove invaluable.

The Edinburgh Fringe experience in 2018 – the ‘magic’ of the Mile

0

It is 3pm on one of the main streets of Edinburgh, and a silent disco is making its way past on both sides of the street. An impromptu rendition of ‘Daddy Cool’ announces its arrival, to the great amusement of everyone not wearing headphones. I can’t help but think that for anyone who hasn’t come to this city for the Fringe – the largest arts festival in the world – that this entire thing must be incredibly annoying. As it is, it’s a wonderful, spectacular, surreal experience for the rest of us.

The sheer size of the Fringe can be hard to grasp even with numbers: in 2017 there were 53,232 performances throughout the month – and that’s not even to include the many unofficial events and the other Festivals which take place throughout the city.

Due in part to this size, most performances are short. The day becomes segmented into hour-long slots, organised through a mix of meticulous organisation and last-minute stress. The quintessential Fringe experience is wandering into a free show with a flier and a promise it’s starting in five minutes. Sometimes it’s fantastic, and you wonder why they didn’t charge full price. Sometimes it’s terrible, and interrupted by a disco beat emanating from the room next door. And sometimes it brings out the best in people – on multiple occasions I was offered a ticket by a stranger who had accidentally double-booked, free of charge.

Here’s the thing about the Fringe, with all its eccentricities and sold-out shows and rave reviews – most shows will have a near-empty audience. Even for big names, such as Matt Forde, I saw seats still available; for smaller, free, shows, operating on flyering and abject hope, you might have eight people in a 100-seat audience. And it is very, very hard to perform to this small an audience – particularly for stand-up or comedy, which often works by bouncing off the crowd. It is even harder to get up after a terrible show and do that again. And again. And again.

It might seem obvious, but I’m struck most of all by the bravery required to perform here, night after night for three and a half weeks. It’s an hour a day – but an hour in which you’re completely exposing yourself to the whims of an unfamiliar audience.

And a tough audience as well. The people seeing your show will likely see another that day – if not two, three, or even more. It’s a place where time is at a premium. Show recommendations are thrown around like confetti, and a show seen at midday can quickly become the first in a to-do list which involves running from one side of town to the other. With an audience as unfocused as this one, it’s important to catch their attention – but how can you even begin do that, when that audience is an elderly couple, a young family, and two people who just wandered in off the street?

And yet there’s still something magical about wandering down the Royal Mile – the only place where you would willingly take fifteen flyers in your hands while just trying to pass through. It’s here that the place really feels like a festival, and everyone is given an equal chance to shine – and although catching someone’s attention on the street is usually impossible, there’s something about the Mile which actually makes you want to stop for thirty seconds, listening to this person who desperately sells you their bizarre improv act. Yes, maybe you’ll never go back and see their show. But for a moment the possibility is there.

In many ways, this small stretch of road demonstrates just what’s so special about this festival – the sheer energy of the place, which permeates every act and kick-starts a relentless cultural exchange. It’s at times exhausting, but the Fringe still remains the best kind of overwhelming; and if there’s one thing this 71-year-old festival has proved, it’s that people will keep coming back for more.

Hall food: A short introduction

0

In first year, your college hall will be your closest and most convenient source of decent food – especially if you live on your college’s main site. Dining in college is not only friendly on the pocket strings, it provides a relaxed social environment to meet new people and catch up with friends (which is a great way to break up a long day at the library).

Some factual info:

Hall dinners at most colleges come in two forms. At the first, informal hall, you line up with a tray where the food is being served and pick the courses you want. You can typically get a main course and dessert for under £3, dress casually, and stay for as long as you please.

The second, formal hall, is a three-course meal held after informal hall which typically lasts for about an hour. The frequency and ‘formality’ of these meals varies between colleges. At Lincoln and Christ Church, for example, formal hall is held most days of the week but is a relatively casual affair: gowns must be worn but you can still turn up wearing your trackies underneath.

Other colleges, such as St. Hugh’s, have less frequent ‘formals’ (as ‘formal hall’ is sometimes shortened to) for which people tend to get more dressed up. Colleges also hold formals for special events, for example Christmas dinner, which are usually great fun and get booked up very fast.

At most colleges’ formal halls, wine glasses are set out but wine isn’t served – so if you do fancy a glass (of wine or anything else) with your meal, make sure to bring your own bottle!

College catering staff can accommodate for most dietary requirements, and there will always be (reasonably) good vegetarian and vegan options available.

To pay, you can either use cash or scan your student card; it is similar to a system you might have had at school. Either pay a lump sum at the start of term or pay for what you have eaten through your battel (Oxford-speak for ‘bill’) at the end of term.

Some, admirably, make it their goal to sample the food at every hall in Oxford. There are loads of ways to ‘hall surf’: formal hall swaps with friends are always enjoyable, while planned social and charity events at different colleges’ halls are also common. There’s even a Facebook page dedicated to formal-hall-swapping!

Top tips:

  • Check the menus! You can usually find these on college websites. (You don’t want to miss out on those delicious sweet potato fries…)
  • Inform the catering staff if you have dietary requirements/allergies.
  • Halal or Kosher meat is only provided at some colleges, so check that first.
  • Turn up a little earlier for formal. If the start time listed is 7:15pm, aim to arrive by 7:00pm. Also, bring a bottle of wine or something non-alcoholic.
  • Enjoy the occasion! If you’re dining in the ‘original’ Hogwarts hall, a.k.a. Christ Church, take in the atmosphere.

If you love food as much as I do, be sure to explore the variety of dishes on offer. Bon appétit!

Theresa May portrait returns to Geography department

1

A portrait of Theresa May has returned to the Geography department four months after it was initially removed, following criticism from students and academics.

The picture – part of a celebration of the department’s female alumnae – was initially taken down following backlash in May. The University claimed this was because it “was being obscured by posters bearing various messages”, and that it “will be re-displayed so it can be seen as intended.”

The portrait is now back on display after a “long process of consultation.”

In a statement, the Geography department said: “Any exhibition portraying the achievements of women has the potential to cause controversy (what is ‘achievement’? Who should be chosen to reflect ‘achievement’? How should they be portrayed? How to address intersectionality issues? Who should make those choices?).

“These issues were compounded in this case by the fact that one of the School’s female alumna (Theresa May) received many nominations to be included, but is also a controversial political figure and a current Head of State [sic]. Those responsible for the exhibition thought long and hard about whether or not to include her portrait, but ultimately decided to go ahead.”

They added: “Theresa May’s appearance in this exhibition reflects the fact that she is a woman alumna of the School in a significant leadership position. It is not a comment on her activities in that position: the School is a non-partisan body.

“We are not afraid of debate and discussion. The decision to include her in this re-curated exhibition was taken by the School Committee on a majority vote. The ‘engagement space’ provided is designed to encourage further contributions.”

However, the campaign group that spearheaded calls for the portrait’s removal, NotAllGeographers, took issue with how the consultation process took place.

A spokesperson told Cherwell: “The consultation was how to situate the portrait rather than question that it should be there in the first place. What sort of consultation already says that something is out of bounds? That’s why many didn’t engage in the first place. It was a phoney consultation set up to please donors and establish a form of credibility.”

The School of Geography also stated that they have provided a space for people to add their comments on the exhibition and the debate which surrounds it.

However, NotAllGeographers told Cherwell: “Our original campaign actually situated comments around the portrait, thereby creating space, a bordering of May (as she has done to many as Home Secretary and as PM). What the new space does is only offer a space away, hidden in the emergency refuge space, out of sight.

“That doesn’t strike us a discussion space but one to hide away and quell dissent.”

The School of Geography and Environment has been contacted for further comment.

Abracadabra, à la Kassam: How the magic of the cup can get students watching local football

0

Oxford United will host Manchester City at the Kassam Stadium in the third round of the Carabao Cup on the 25th of September. It promises to be a huge game for the town, with a bumper crowd expected and selection for television coverage almost an inevitability.

However, very few people at university seem to care about Oxford United. Although the Kassam Stadium and the chance to watch professional football is just a bus ride away, there does not appear to be an appetite for local football among students and even the thought of it seems so detached from university life.

Last season I went to my first Oxford United home match, against Rochdale. The price of the match ticket was reasonable at £14, the standard of football was high and the atmosphere created by the home fans was as good as I’ve seen on my travels, following my team Morecambe up and down the country. To top it all off, Oxford came away with a 2-1 win. There was nothing not to like. So why is it that there is no real taste for local football among students and what could make more people get behind the local side?

In my opinion, students don’t go and watch Oxford United because it is too easy to get your football fix elsewhere. With Monday Night Football, midweek cup competitions and Super Sunday, the concept of 3 o’clock on a Saturday is being lost. Going to watch a football match seems like an occasion, rather than a routine. It is this routine that is at the centre of enjoying lower league football. The familiarity of catching the same bus, having a pint in the same pub before the game and sitting in the same seats as two weeks before is the charm of it all – but the JCR TV will always be the cheaper and easier option. Another issue is the work required on the fan’s part, and with university life being so busy, this work is difficult to put in. The average student probably could not name any Oxford United players, couldn’t tell you how to get to the ground or who the manager of the team is. It does take time to learn these things and get this familiarity, but once you do, you can really feel a part of the club. Without such familiarity, you are only really going to watch the yellows against the reds or the blues. It isn’t the most exciting prospect.

So this is the issue, to get people to want to watch the football there is a need for familiarity, but this familiarity is only achieved by going to the football. It is an impenetrable cycle, like that meme about applying for a job when you have no experience. What’s more, the number of games it takes to achieve this familiarity is hard to reach given the busy nature of university life and the fact that most students aren’t actually in Oxford for that long. It seems like a cycle that cannot be broken – but this is where the magic comes in.

Televised coverage can fast track the process of familiarisation, and Oxford’s match with Man City will be a prime example. Sky Sports are very adept at putting across the story of a football club. Knowing that most of its audience won’t know much about Oxford United, they will pick out the players to keep a close eye on, tell anecdotes that endear us to the players and staff, and set out the story of the season so far, in order to make the game more interesting to the neutral. To diehard Oxford fans this may come across as an oversimplification of their club, but to casual supporters, and any student watching, this is the information that enables you to root for the team and create an affinity with them. Whether they win or lose, after this game Oxford United will become a lot more familiar to students and it will be a much more enticing prospect to go and watch them play.

I speak from experience. The second team I follow is Bristol City and last season they reached the semi-finals of the Carabao cup, knocking out Manchester United and playing two legs against Manchester City in the process. I was lucky enough to go to the second leg in Bristol with my friend from Bristol University. He brought some of his university mates along and you could see other similar groups of students in the crowd. The magnitude of the game visibly connected the students with the town and its football club. It was great to see the unifying power of football, not too dissimilar to this summer with the World Cup. I really think something of the sort can happen with Oxford and its students.

And so if you can, sit down and watch the game against Man City. Oxford are the underdogs, but with the magic of the cup who knows what might happen? You might even find yourself a second team.

First-generation, black student launches crowdfund to take up Oxford place

0

A prospective Oxford student has received widespread support for his crowdfunding effort to raise enough money to take up MSc studies this academic year.

Roy Celaire, who is a first-generation student, aims to become an academic anthropologist to “work on the issues confronting members of the black community in Britain.”

Roy is currently short of his target by just under £3,000. Last year, the University of Oxford agreed to defer Roy’s place, when he could not raise the £30,000 fees required.

His crowdfund has drawn support from across the U.K. so far, including from Cambridge University Professor of Classics, Mary Beard.

Growing up in Hackney, east London, Celaire attended the failing Homerton College of Technology, now “closed down due to incredibly low attainment, gangs and violence.” He later became homeless after his mother abandoned him aged 17.

Moving to Brentwood in Essex from Hackney, Roy became the first member of his family to go to university when he took up a place at the University of Southampton to read Sociology and Social Policy. However, he was forced to drop out after his first year, due to the financial pressures of commuting and meeting rent bills.

Nonetheless, he remained undeterred and enrolled as a mature student at Brunel University in London, graduating with a degree in Anthropology and Sociology. He then attended LSE for a Masters in Gender Studies while continuing to work full-time.

“I was having to work 50-60 hours a week just to keep myself and pay my rent as well as studying. Somehow I managed to graduate with a Merit but when I told my tutors that I had worked full time throughout the degree they were stunned,” Roy said of his time at LSE.

Following an offer from Oxford for further study, it was whilst working in Waitrose that a customer suggested Roy set up a crowdfund.

Roy told Cherwell: “The journey has been overwhelming, in that I did not expect the immense support I have received to date. I’m truly grateful to all who have donated, regardless of whether it was a £5 donation or a £1,500 donation.

“Many have commented on the fact that there are not many black people at Oxford in general and at postgraduate level in particular, and we are talking about those born in the U.K., not international students. People have expressed concern over the lack of black British academics in the U.K. and also shown their amazement at the deep costs of postgraduate study.

Roy added: “The donations have now started to dry up, the last few were from me asking colleagues to donate.

Regarding the attention his crowdfund has attracted, Roy said: “The comments and support have touched me deeply, as it showed me that I was not alone and that people could see and appreciate the efforts made to get to my present situation of having a place at Oxford.”

He also noted: “My mentor Jon Blair CBE has been amazing, so too has Professor Mary Beard, who has tweeted and donated. Mary has been extremely helpful and I’m so grateful to her for her support. I would like to thank them both publicly. I want to thank everybody at Keble as they have been very helpful, patient and understanding, regarding my situation, since last year.”

Roy’s raised his initial target of £20,000 to £30,000 after he realised he was no longer eligible for a postgraduate loan of £10,000, since he had already completed an earlier Master’s degree. He hopes to reach £32,000, so that when GoFundMe take their percentage fee, Roy has the £30,000 required total for his studies. At the time of publication, 715 people have donated £27,203 in 20 days.

Roy writes on his GoFundMe page: “I am incredibly moved by the generosity of so many people and I hate to be asking for so much money but I can assure you all that I will try to repay your faith in me by giving something back to society as an academic one day.

“To the best of my ability, I have persevered so as to not let circumstances beat me, but now I feel nearly beaten and this is probably my last chance to put myself on the road to my dream.”

Donations to Roy’s crowdfund can be made here, or by visiting https://uk.gofundme.com/hackney-to-oxford

Barcodes for the homeless: insulting or ingenious?

2

A new scheme by Greater Change in Oxford aims to provide homeless people with QR barcodes which pedestrians can scan. This would enable people to read about their backstory, donate to them via mobile bank transfer, and ensure that the donated money is only spent on approved activities. Homeless people participating in the scheme can display the barcode in any way they wish, whether that be by wearing it or holding it as a sign.

For: Tara Sallis

“Do you not think that it is rather like scanning an item in the supermarket?” suggested the BBC reporter presenting a video on this new initiative. I’ll admit that I feel discomfort when seeing this form of giving, which stems from the fact that it comes across as transactional. When we think of someone giving change to the homeless, we imagine someone generous and kind; someone scanning a homeless person’s QR code does not conjure up such a warm image, even though they are essentially doing the same thing.

The problem here is that when people perform small acts of charity such as giving to the homeless, there is typically an element of that person wanting some social credit. Interestingly, much of the outcry about this initiative has been about the optics – as if the giving process was somehow tainted by being made digital.

The debate that we are having here is not really about the homeless: it is about how good we look when we are giving to them. If we used this barcode system, it is likely that at least some pedestrians who would have wanted to give to a homeless person but were short on change, will now be able to. And others, who may have worried about how the donated money would be spent, may now be persuaded to give to someone in need since the money cannot be stolen and is guaranteed to go towards constructive things.

But ultimately, all that really matters is that we are giving an option to people in need. Homeless people can choose for themselves whether or not they want the QR codes, and they are more than capable of simply not signing up for one if they don’t like the idea. Surely if a homeless person chooses to use the QR code as a tool to improve their life, it would be incredibly patronizing of the student population to condemn this choice.

The argument that the system encourages us to just scan the QR code and move on, thus taking away a human dimension to the process, simply does not stand up. It is unclear why unlocking your phone and scanning it takes any less time than putting down a few coins. People who stay and chat to the homeless will continue to do so, people who don’t, won’t.

As for the idea that homeless people will start competing to create the most desperate story about their lives to get the most donations, this fundamentally misunderstands the nature of giving to the homeless. People do not go from one homeless person to another before donating to the individual they perceive to have the worst life. For the most part, people pass a homeless person on the street and arbitrarily choose to give them money simply because they happen to have spotted them. The notion that people will start demanding that the homeless offer up their QR codes before ranking them off against each other is frankly ludicrous.

What really dehumanises homeless people within our society is that they are living in such desperate conditions on the streets. If we genuinely care about making the homeless feel human again, we should commend the creation of new tools which they can choose to use to get themselves out of their predicament. Maybe this scheme will be successful, maybe it won’t be. But the introduction of such an innovation addressing the homelessness issue is a positive development which should undoubtedly be encouraged.

Against: Sophie Kilminster

The thumbnail for the BBC news video explaining Greater Change’s scheme to allow people to make cashless donations to homeless people was enough to put me off the idea. The picture is of Terry, a homeless man in Oxford, looking up towards a faceless person brandishing a smartphone at him to scan the barcode attached to a string around his neck. The immediate initial impression I get is that of Terry wearing a dog-tag and being at the whim of someone with a lot more power than him.

It is inevitable that there will be a power imbalance between the homeless and the rest. This is particularly the case in Oxford, where students in ball-gowns, sub fusc and expensive designer gear flounce past those who can barely afford to eat. That power dynamic is perhaps unavoidable, and as one homeless woman interviewed in the video admits: yes, wearing a barcode is objectifying, but at least it brings in some money.

But here is where my main gripe with the system kicks in: when you scan the QR code attached to your homeless person-of-choice’s neck, you’re able to read their bio. Terry’s bio states that he was once a scaffolder, but that his relationship with his partner ended badly and led to him becoming homeless. It is frankly none of our business why Terry is homeless, and how galling must it be for him to have to make the painful facts of his past public to get a few quid off some student standing over him with their expensive smartphone?

Likewise, I worry that this QR barcode system could result in people who are on the streets for less ‘nice’ reasons, such as being an ex-incarcerated person or being an addict, being seen as less deserving of people’s money. No matter their reasons for being on the streets (which, again, are none of our business), homeless people deserve a chance at a fresh start and should never have to air their dirty laundry to get this.

I hate to think of how this could become some battle of tragic backstories, with certain homeless people alienated by the scheme’s donators because their story isn’t as nice as that of the man sitting a few metres down the same road. Ultimately, our kindness and goodwill should never be exclusively for those who are homeless for supposedly ‘worthy’ reasons; if our goodwill is not universal, then it becomes divisive, not helpful.

An even more pressing concern is that the act of refusing to wear a barcode which details all the bad hands life has dealt may be misconstrued by the public as such homeless people being unwilling to get back on their feet. It’s important to remember that nobody wants to be homeless, and if it were simply a question of willpower then the current homelessness crisis might not exist.

Ultimately, the bio element of the app and the likeness of the barcode to a dog tag are real oversights which make this system fatally flawed. Whilst this scheme has its heart in the right place, we must be careful not to sacrifice morality and humanity when technology takes such a big step forward.

Artist Feature: Drake

0

Despite facing accusations of uninventive ghost-writing and over-singing on his tracks, Drake currently occupies 13 spaces on the Billboard 100. Drake is omnipresent: the radio is obsessed with ‘Nice for What’, social media was captivated by the #InMyFeelings challenge and Spotify is still obsessed with his image. It’s hard then, to imagine him before the fame – a teacher at my school nonchalantly spoke of going to school with the young Aubrey Graham, and disappointingly described him as a pretty normal guy. Whether ‘Fuckin’ Problems’ or ‘Take Care’ was more your taste, Drake has been a constituent figurehead of contemporary music for our generation.

This is, in part, due to his appearance on TV show Degrassi in the early 2000s, which cemented his popularity in native Canada before his music took off. He left the show after the release of his debut, Room for Improvement, in 2006, with particular standouts like ‘City is Mine’ showcasing his playful arrogance and establishing his allegiance to Toronto – a theme which continues to influence his music.

His 2007 mixtape, Comeback Season, birthed the OVO label, and a collaboration with Trey Songz on Replacement Girl brought him national attention. However, it was Drake’s remix of Lil Wayne’s ‘Man of the Year’ which could be seen as the beginning of his rise. Wayne invited Drake to join him on tour, spawning mixes together like I Want This Forever (the precursor to Drake’s popular song, ‘Forever’). This laid the foundations for Drake’s later signing to the Young Money Entertainment label.

His 2009 mixtape, So Far Gone, was his first taste of commercial success – ‘Best I Ever Had’ was his first top-ten single, and also earnt him two Grammy nominations. His celebrity had unmistakably launched.

It’s hard to deny that his debut album, Thank Me Later, demonstrated his innate early lyricism and easy flow, but perhaps its title was aptronymic in that his second studio album was much more deserving of the fanfare and dizzying praise associated with a debut. Take Care, as the title suggests, was more cautious and the production more consistent – the end result being an album that remains a firm fan favourite, despite numerous subsequent releases.

A project I could rant about easily, Drake’s sophomore album sees him finding balance. It delivered in all aspects, occupying the marginal gap between self-conscious maturity (e.g. on ‘Shot for Me’) and his regular brazen showmanship, seemingly accentuated by Lil Wayne on ‘The Motto’ and ‘HYFR’both of which are still weekly staples of the Park End Curve floor seven years later (if that’s any marker of success). It’s also the album which helped get a generation through heartbreak – ‘Marvin’s Room’ remains the pièce-de-résistance of long-time producer 40’s talents, for bringing his typical muffled synths and broody ambience to a head. Praise is also due for his work alongside The Weeknd on the mellow and introspective ‘Crew Love’. The album as a whole cemented Drake’s status, while the vulnerability and candour he brought was largely unparalleled by contemporaries, his emotive lyricism providing refreshing quality, resulting in a much wider audience for the budding artist.

2013’s Nothing Was The Same saw the return of Drake’s early boastfulness, with ‘Started from the Bottom’ and ‘Worst Behaviour’ showcasing a cocky attitude. It’s easy listening, but with actual merit besides the mellow beats and honey vocals provided by Jhene Aiko and Majid Jordan. Remembering to pay homage where it’s due, Drake successfully carries off a sample of Wu-Tang’s ‘It’s Yourz’ on ‘Wu-Tang Forever’, and the later ‘Pound Cake’ interpolates ‘C.R.E.A.M’ his talent is shown in the duality of his increasing experimentalism, with an ability to throw it back and expose the humble sensitivity of earlier hip hop.

What A Time To Be Alive, a collaborative album with Future, brought Drake back into the buzz with energetic beats, and Metro Boomin’s trap-inspired production. It’s probably fair to say that it’s an album which Future dominates, but ‘Jumpman’ was of course an immediate classic, and it’s a track which Drake navigates with authoritative confidence.

2015 would perhaps be better celebrated as the year of If You’re Reading This It’s Too Late. Though ‘Madonna’ and ‘Now & Forever’ showcase his melodic prowess, and led to him being christened ‘the original sad rapper’ by critics, there’s an obvious harshness in tracks like ‘6 God’ and ‘6 Man’. ‘Know Yourself’ boasts of his possession of Toronto and its slang, which sadly took prevalence over the more emotive ‘You & The 6’, a softer devotional to his single mother which would likely be more at home with his earlier R&B moods, and deserves more hype for the honesty and perspective it displays.

Drake’s change with each album can again be charted with 2016’s Views, and honestly, it’s an album I’ve never been able to listen to in full. Like an autobiography set to music, Drake’s introspection becomes tiring, and his inability to settle on a mood for the excessively-long listing makes listening disjointed. His interest in dancehall here does bring something new to his discography – ‘Controlla’ and ‘One Dance’ are undeniably bops, and it’s a shame that their overexposure made them somewhat annoying. However, the emotion which made Drake sound different years earlier now came off as hollow. The album did well, as all of Drake’s do, but rightfully received less critical acclaim than his usual introspection.

More Life could be a playlist, it could be a mixtape – critics are split on what to call it, but united in positive reviews of the 2017 project. Changing things up for a seventh major release is no easy feat. Most importantly, Drake used his huge celebrity to give rise to genres usually ignored in favour of viral rap: dancehall influences continued in ‘Blem’, he featured on Nigerian star WizKid’s ‘Come Closer’, while Drake’s unusual love of the UK and grime scene became apparent in ‘No Long Talk’ and ‘KMT’.  Drake got into British rap and the grime battle scene through spearheads such as Wiley and Skepta, with Skepta admitting to seeing his shadow in the toxic beefs between Drake and Meek Mill. Toronto would forever be home, but there has been an undeniable hint of London in Drake’s releases from the past couple of years – Sampha’s vocals on ‘4422’ are delicate yet atmospheric, and the natural Canadian twang on ‘KMT’ or ‘Gyalchester’ is amusing when twisted around British slang. More Life was the birth of Drake’s relationship with the UK, which recently culminated in him doing a ‘Fire in the Booth’ freestyle, with an obvious UK drill influence.

More Life was long enough for Drake to explore everything in depth, and thus no one side felt short-changed: there was broody, evaluative ambience (I put ‘Do Not Disturb’ and ‘Teenage Fever’ on almost every playlist I make), while stellar features from Travis Scott and Young Thug rooted his more energetic side.

Finally, we’re brought to this year’s offering, which both surpasses expectations and still manages somehow to fall flat. Some tracks romanticise paternity, with ‘Emotionless’ hinting at some inherent protectiveness to explain Drake’s absent take to parenting. However, the issues in his personal relationships and the maturity he manages in admitting his faults are reminiscent of his early sincerity, and embracing his shame informs the dignified and triumphant tone of the album as a whole, despite an inevitably forced hand. It’s not our place to judge whether or not he’s a good parent, but elsewhere the weighty ‘March 14’ gives the album an unspoken intimacy.

It’s inevitable that in 90 minutes, with few major guest appearances, there are going to be some passes – while having no obvious flops, there’s little to say about songs like ‘Ratchet Happy Birthday’ (not even PARTYNEXTDOOR can revive this) and ‘Can’t Take A Joke’. Scorpion follows its predecessor in being exhaustingly long, with little grit to keep listeners hooked. Yet, not unlike the loyal 40 who still masterminds the majority of album production, we stay invested – it’s worth remembering that he has just spent 6 weeks topping the Billboard 200. Though victory over considerably aging albums from competition like Post Malone and Cardi B is hardly impressive, there is something to be said for Drake’s ability to captivate his audience so consistently, and the monopoly he holds over streaming services and the radio.

In theory, the double-album offers Drake the scope to both revel in his glory on the A-side and reflect upon it on the more R&B minded flipside; but there is at times confusion, such as between the heavy background thump of ‘Elevate’ versus its own soft lyricism complicating its position on the ‘rap’ side. ‘I’m Upset’ shows that Drake refuses to give up his juvenile approach to relationships and the social media play on ‘Summer Games’ is immature amidst his (excessive) (try-hard) gloomy vocals.

The R&B-side is a mixed bag: Drake sounds tired and disinterested in the opener ‘Peak’, and I don’t think it’s just method-acting for the deadbeat boyfriend the track discusses. ‘Final Fantasy’ on the other hand uses his slurring to an atmospheric, sensual effect.  ‘After Dark’ is an overlooked winner on this album, sampling the late Static Major to create a mellow tune which you could easily believe dates to the early 00s, surprisingly impassioned by a solid guest appearance from Ty Dolla $ign.

Guest appearances as a whole are where Scorpion really comes into its own, and they also demonstrate Drake’s bold experimentalism and the extent of his fortune – ‘Nice for What’ may have prominent (and therefore pricey) samples in Lauryn Hill and Wu-Tang to name but a few, but the obvious choice across the album is Michael Jackson’s posthumous appearance on ‘Don’t Matter To Me’. Sampling previously-unheard vocals, Drake takes his music to edge of experimentalism and pushes the boundaries of R&B and pop. The song is emotive and Drake’s reflective verses couple hauntingly with Jackson’s brief sample. Michael Jackson is as instantly recognisable as ever, but heavy autotune makes him come off more like The Weeknd, who ironically drew heavy inspiration from the late King of Pop on early tracks. The appearance is a flex – it’s less about what Drake has done with the MJ feature and entirely about the fact that he was able to secure it in the first place.

As with much of Drake’s recent work, the album is largely spoiled by its own overexposure – I refuse to listen to ‘In My Feelings’ in full out of principle, and everyone was over ‘God’s Plan’ by the time the album actually dropped. Nonetheless, the album’s highlights – ‘Nonstop’, ‘8 out of 10’, ‘Sandra’s Rose’, ‘Don’t Matter to Me’, ‘Final Fantasy’ – are worth a listen.

I’d be happy to see Drake take a hiatus and focus more on the October’s Very Own brand before coming back to music with a little more substance – starting off by fulfilling his annually-disappointing promise to bring OVO Fest to London wouldn’t hurt. He’s faced criticism in the past that he’s stifling newer talents like Roy Woods and dvsn through lazy management at OVO: both hugely talented, and yet still minor, players in the industry despite years since their respective debuts. Drake could do well mentoring fresh meat, but critics will only get more vicious at the future release of more half-baked albums lacking the enthusiasm of his younger self, and fans increasingly disillusioned at the dilution of his early potential.