Friday, May 9, 2025
Blog Page 783

Life Divided: Cuppers

Pro Cuppers

Claire Castle

It is a sunny afternoon, in early May, but right now I don’t notice the weather. My ears are filled with the thudding of blood, and my heart pounding in my chest. Adrenaline is coursing through every part of my being.

There is a single word on the lips of everyone around me. They call it a chant, but that could never encapsulate its beauty. This is a symphony, a moment of awless rapture; brought out in a guttural cry, rising from the depths of each individual soul, and swelling to envelop us all in the same cloak of celebration and joy, so much contained in just two syllables. “Keble”.

But what is this moment of such beauty, such joy, such climax you ask? The answer should be clear: it is the winning of the rugby cuppers final.

In this moment, I am sure there has never been a group of people more closely bound than we are now. I am not simply a student at this college, at this sporting event, I am every one of us. Every player, every spectator, every poor soul trapped in the library learning of the game only through sporadic texts. We are each cells of the greater body that is the college, moving, rising and falling together to the beat of a drum only we can hear. In this moment of epiphany, I feel I finally understand the Buddhist concept of Interdependent Co-arising. And every cell sings with the same pride, for the college, for the team, for the self that we all become together. How could anyone claim to be a better college, when we have so clearly proved our infinite worth by being the best at passing balls across a large field?!

If this experience has taught me anything, it is that cuppers must be something fantastic, to bring us together with such force, and to raise college pride between us to such extent. To question it is to question the very fabric of college society as a whole.

Against Cuppers

Alice Ritchie

To the uninitiated, cuppers seems to offer a non-threat- ening and relaxed introduction to Oxford’s inter-collegiate competition.

You are lured into a false sense of security when you hear that comforting phrase which all enthusiastic (but useless) competitors, such as myself, long for: “it’s the taking part that counts.”

But that’s not what it’s about.

As with everything at Oxford which contains even the remotest hint of competition, those who participate are out to win, and absolutely obliterate their comepetition, without even a shred of mercy.

So much so, that the unsuspecting fresher who signed up, confident in the knowledge that no-one else could sprint either, is suddenly up against quasi-Olympic athletes. And the keen amateur dramatist who thought their cameo appearance in the school’s rendition of We Will Rock You would cut the mustard, finds themselves on stage with those who would have attended the Royal Academy of Dramatic Art, had the Oxford offer failed to come to fruition. Masquerading as an unintimidating way for anyone to enjoy the extra-curriculars on offer, cuppers sets the average Joe Bloggs up for failure and humiliation. So traumatising is this experience that many return to the comforting embrace of the library, never to be seen again.

Peel away the amicable veneer which once enticed you, and the true nature of cuppers is revealed: it is not the golden ticket to stardom and lifelong friendships that it pretends to be. Nor is it the perfect opportunity to hone your sporting acumen in order to score that chirpse.

In fact, the only thing I can say for certain is that it’s just not my cupper tea.

Bell stars as Oxford beaten at Twickenham

0

Cambridge upset the odds to win a second consecutive Men’s Varsity Match at Twickenham by a margin of 20-10

Having won just three of their ten games this season, the Light Blues went in as underdogs, and Oxford dominated for large phases of the first half.

But the Cambridge defence, marshalled from full-back by captain Charlie Amesbury, held firm, and were clinical in attack.

Man of the match Chris Bell scored the only try of the first half, scooting around the back of the scrum to cross in front of the Oxford supporters to take the Light Blues into the break 5-3 ahead.

Archie Russell – brother of Scotland international Finn – then took advantage of an overload on the left to score in the corner, before the immense Will Wilson took the gap to three points with his try.

But skipper Amesbury crossed following a rolling maul, and Cambridge saw out the win in a professional manner.

Despite going into the clash as firm favourites with the bookies, and win a record of eight wins in ten games this season, Oxford started frantically, as both sides made basic errors in the opening minutes. Cambridge number eight Buchan Richardson had a try disallowed as he was tackled into touch, but neither side was particularly dominant.

However, Sam Edgerley and Ed David turned on the style, and Oxford dominated the next twenty minutes with several bursting runs into the Cambridge 22.

Wilson and ex-Saracens flanker Andy Saull both breached the Cambridge defensive line, but their offloads were both intercepted just as it looked like the Dark Blues would open the scoring.

But a turnover from second row Andrew Hunter turned the tide soon before half-time. It led to a series of dominant attacks from Cambridge, who had a try held up by some last-ditch Oxford defending.

And when Cambridge, the better side in the scrum despite their comparatively lightweight pack, drove forward on the five-metre line, scrum-half Bell sold Conor Kearns with a dummy, and ran in to score next to the posts.

Oxford continued to put the pressure on before half-time, but could not turn the screw – although a Kearns penalty took the deficit to just two leading into the interval.

The second half started scrappily, but a lengthy stoppage after 50 minutes due to a serious injury to flanker Matt Watson disrupted Oxford’s rhythm, and Cambridge attacked well.

While they were not always dominant in terms of territory or possession, Cambridge were clinical going forwards, and did not suffer from the same nervy handling that plagued the Dark Blues.

In truth, several backs were nowhere near their brilliant best, and Oxford’s attacking phases were too predictable for most of the second half.

After a spell of possession in the final quarter, Cambridge spread the ball out left, where Ed David was isolated against Russell. The winger missed his tackle at the most vital of moments, and the Scotland youth cap crossed to give his side some breathing space.

Wave after wave of Oxford attack followed, with Dom Waldouck and Dan Moor marauding forward in the centres and Wilson driving penetratingly through the middle.

Finally, the pressure told, and Wilson’s converted try gave the Dark Blues hope of a comeback.

But Cambridge did not panic, and stuck to their gameplan of playing physical rugby. After winning a penalty in the midfield and kicking for touch, the lineout turned into a rolling maul to which Oxford had no answer. Amesbury, at the back of it, touched down to extend the lead, and Mike Phillips shook his nerves to convert – with only ten minutes left to play, there was little chance of a comeback.

Oxford never looked like scoring in the final minutes, and were left to rue their wretched first-half luck: had their barrage of attacks been reflected by the scoreboard, it would surely have been a very different outcome.

For Cambridge, it was a remarkable result against a side that had only been beaten by one team before today’s encounter. The Light Blues were resolute in defence and ruthless in attack, and, in the end, were good value for their win.

Five minutes with… Sos Eltis

0
Could you tell us a bit about your position at OUDS?

I’ve been a senior member for Ouds for the last 18 or so years – at first alongside Adam Swift, then with Kirsten Shepherd-Barr and now with Ros Ballaster.

How long have you been working with OUDS for?
At least 18 years – possibly longer, but I can’t remember precisely. I’m finally stepping down this year, as the Proctors have declared that no-one should be a senior member for more than three years – so my retirement is rather overdue.

Were you involved with drama as a student at Oxford?
Not much, sadly. I directed a load of plays at school, but rather lost confidence when faced with the vastness of Oxford drama – I was at Christ Church and there was no low-level way in that I could see. I can’t act to save my life, and taking the leap into directing was too daunting. Then I found rowing, and that was all my spare time for the next decade gone!

What’s your fondest memory of drama at Oxford?
I directed Aphra Behn’s The Rover for the Brasenose Arts Festival and absolutely loved it. It was a complete joy – a really lovely and talented bunch of actors, and incredible fun. The play came together brilliantly in the end. It was an open-air production in the summer. One night was so cold that the audience were freezing but didn’t want to leave. So we found blankets and jackets, and everyone hunkered down to the end.

What’s your favourite play?
Can I have two? The Importance of Being Earnest – I’ve probably read or seen it at least 40 times by now but I love every word of it. W. H. Auden called it “the only purely verbal opera in English” and it’s true – it’s not just brilliantly funny, it’s also has the most perfect rhythms and phrasing. My other favourite has to be Kushner’s Angels in America. It’s angry, urgent and incredibly humane, and still spine-tinglingly innovative.

Do you have any heroes in the world of theatre?
So many! Off the top of my head (and heart): Yael Farber, Athol Fu- gard and Tom Stoppard. Yael Farber for some of the most thrilling, moving and emotionally gruelling experiences I’ve had in theatre. Fugard is an incredible playwright and an extraordinary human being. He made theatre a powerful weapon in the fight against apartheid – a weapon that scared the authorities while expressing the incredible power of man’s humanity. He’s compassionate, wise, open, unbelievably generous and inspiringly open about his flaws. And Tom Stoppard, for giving me more pleasure in the theatre than anyone short of Shakespeare. For the intellectual excitement of his plays, the sheer pleasure of thought and joy in language. For the sheer chutzpah of what attempts and the extraordinary brilliance that he so often carries off.

What advice would you give to those who might be reluctant to get involved with Oxford drama?
Get stuck in. Try anything. And don’t be scared. The joy of Oxford drama is not just the range of talent but also the freedom to make mistakes.

Adolescent queer love in ‘Call Me By Your Name’

0

During the summer of 1983, 17 year old Elio (Timothée Chalamet) spends his days writing music, swimming, and lounging around the Italian countryside with his friends. However, his life is changed forever when graduate student Oliver (Armie Hammer) arrives to work with Elio’s father.

The Italian landscape has provided a luscious setting for romance narratives, and Luca Guadagnino’s adaptation of André Aciman’s novel assuredly asserts its place in this canon. The film opens, ambiguously, ‘somewhere in Northern Italy’ and this indeterminate location immediately establishes the queer sensibilities of the film.

Oliver is an immediately arresting presence in the film as Hammer’s striking athletic physique dominates the screen – especially in contrast to Elio’s angular, adolescent frame. Oliver’s body is fetishised by the camera, which lingers on his curved muscles and bronze skin. Presented as a real-life Michelangelo’s David, Guadagnino overtly conflates his muscular body with those of the statues Oliver researches. This underscores the queer eroticism of the film with the inherent homoeroticism of the classical statues mirroring Elio and Oliver’s own sexual desires.

As the summer goes on, so too does their attraction. One of the most masterful elements of the direction is the slow, smouldering development of erotic tension towards the first sexual encounter. Even minor gestures become imbued with erotic significance and intensity – from shared glances, to fingers brushing against each other as they pass in the street.

In a similar style to Blue is the Warmest Colour, Guadagnino emphasises the erotic overtones of eating to signify the pair’s sexual desires. He also exploits the colourful sensuality and textures of the Italian landscape to underscore the blossoming intensity of first love.

The film addresses 1980s homosexuality, right in the middle of the Aids epidemic, where so much was communicated through code. Oliver asks Elio, “Are you saying what I think you’re saying? We can’t talk about those kinds of things,” since they do not have a ‘permitted’ language to express their emotions outside of a heterosexual framework. Guadagnino uses these unspoken gestures of queer love as moments of incredible emotional poignancy, most beautifully demonstrated as Oliver and Elio hold hands and spin through an abandoned Italian street together whilst the film’s dizzying piano score builds, signifying how their love can only able be celebrated in private. It is as exhilarating and intense an experience as any of cinema’s great love stories.

Oxford beaten by dominant Cambridge in Women’s Varsity

0

Oxford were beaten in the 31st Women’s Varsity Match at Twickenham, as a hungry Cambridge side overcame some tough conditions to win 24-0.

It was a game dominated by Cambridge’s forwards, who were exceptional in the scrum and at the breakdown, and Oxford were made to pay for their profligacy in possession.

After a slow first half hour, punctuated by nervous mistakes and handling errors, Cambridge struck twice through Jess Gurney and Lara Gibson to go into the interval 14 points to the good.

And despite Johanna Dombrowski’s best efforts, Oxford never really settled in the second half: Cambridge were much the better side, and tries from Bluebell Nicholls and Cherwell’s player of the match Kate Marks sealed the win.

The first ten minutes of the game were dominated by Oxford, who looked full of confidence after wins in their final two fixtures before the clash. They had most of the early territory, and won a series of scrums following several Cambridge knock-ons.

Violet Smart looked very dangerous for the Dark Blues, making a couple of darting runs down the right, but it was a stop-start game dictated by the heavy rain: both sides understandably found it difficult to string passes together.

Kate Collis impressed at the breakdown for Oxford, but Marks was already stamping her authority on the game, looking to take penalties quickly and dominate proceedings.

A bursting run by winger Abby d’Cruz was the highlight of the half as Oxford were concerned, but the match was a cagey and tight as last year’s 3-0 win had been.

After half an hour, Cambridge managed to burst through the middle of the Dark Blues’ defence, and won a penalty advantage as they spread the ball towards the right-hand corner of the pitch.

That attack broke down, and the penalty was taken quickly just under the posts: a couple of passes later, and hooker Gurney had opened the scoring.

Oxford looked for an instant response, attacking well down the left, but the Light Blues were resolute, and only minutes after their first, they added a second try.

Alice Middleton found herself in space on the left of her own 22, and drove through Oxford’s defensive line. Her chipped kick then bounced perfectly for captain Lara Gibson, who fended off pressure from Sophie Trott to score right under the posts.

Oxford were shell-shocked. It had looked as though they would go into half-time level, but instead, they faced a fourteen-point deficit.

In truth, they never really recovered from the double blow.

Cambridge were dominant in the second half, and Oxford barely made it into their opponents’ half. Dombrowski did her best to rally the troops, but Cambridge, who have a 100% record in the division below their opponents this season, played with a swagger and confidence that their rugby lived up to.

Fifteen minutes into the half, Oxford struggled to cope with a high ball near their own line, and conceded a scrum after knocking the ball on. And after a strong drive forward, Marks’ textbook scrum-half play saw her cross amid mixed tackles from the Dark Blues’ defence to make it 19-0.

The Light Blues continued to dominate as the game entered its final stages, and Bluebell Nicholls’ try in the far corner made sure of the victory.

Union election winner disqualified

7

A candidate elected to the Oxford Union’s Secretary’s Committee has been found guilty of electoral malpractice and stripped of his position.

Musty Kamal – who received the most votes in last month’s Secretary’s Committee election – has now been disqualified retrospectively, after a Union tribunal found him guilty of electoral malpractice.

Kamal was found to have breached Rule 33(a)(i) by making an “illicit statement” – one that is “untrue or misleading” and is intended to influence the course of the election.

However, the verdict has provoked controversy. One student present at the tribunal, Stephen Osuobeni, told Cherwell it was “discouraging that a fresher could be strong-armed by a senior committee member in this way”.

Kamal had claimed to champion a more inclusive Union. He finished first in the Secretary’s Committee election of 24th November, beating nearest rival Eric Sukumaran by 40 votes.

A copy of the ruling on the Oxford Union noticeboard.

But an election tribunal was summoned soon after the close of the poll to hear an allegation of electoral malpractice submitted by Charles Wang, a successful Standing Committee candidate.

The tribunal – chaired by Michaelmas 1999 President Ben Seifert – met on Saturday evening, and unanimously found Kamal guilty of making an “illicit statement”.

An Oxford Union spokesperson confirmed to Cherwell that the statement in question was Kamal’s manifesto claim that he was running as an “independent” candidate.

Screenshots of posts made by Redha Rubaie – unsuccessful candidate for Treasurer – asking people to vote for Kamal, were reportedly brought as evidence.

It is not believed that any evidence was produced showing that Kamal had asked Rubaie to make said posts.

The Society’s rules state that the standard of proof required for a conviction “shall be that the Tribunal is satisfied beyond all reasonable doubt of the defendant’s guilt”, necessitating “an unanimous vote”.

Kamal told Cherwell: “This was an election of firsts. I believe that I was the first non-MBA Secretary’s Committee candidate to get as many as 153 votes. This was a higher number of votes than many candidates on Standing Committee. I was also the only candidate to mention inclusivity on my manifesto.

“It is not inconceivable that had my campaign not been so successful, it would not have attracted so much attention nor a tribunal.

“The idea of inclusivity was able to muster 153 people to vote for a candidate that wants everyone to be represented, everyone rather than the closed off elite it is often criticised for protecting.

“This effort by people within the Union to discredit my message will deter people who want to run independently on a platform of inclusivity in the future.”

The Oxford Union has stated that a full report on the ruling will be available shortly to all members.

Fairytales can show us the horrors of Hitler’s Germany

1

Fairytales often combine innocence with darkness, naivety with sin. Children stand on the edge of a great, dark wood with sex and violence at its heart. Reading the works of the Brothers Grimm, we find tales which contain murder, mutilation, cannibalism, infanticide, and incest. Through a lens of fantasy and magic these stories take us into the blackest and most brutal elements of ourselves.

It’s little wonder then that Günter Grass made prolific use of fairytales in exploring Germany’s past, writing his own fairytale of Germany and the Nazis. In the midst of Germany’s postwar amnesia, Grass, often described as the nation’s moral conscience, reminded Germany of her sins, and demanded her atonement – Catholic themes permeate Grass’ work. Germany’s children stood at the edge of the deep dark forest.

The appeal of the fantasy of fairytale lies not in its distance from humanity, but in its disclosing of human nature. It is this aspect drew so many 20th century magical realists to weave fairytales into their work. The forest contains the hidden drives, wills, and neuroses of the human unconscious. The Nazis and those complicit in their crimes were, like the monsters of the Grimms’, all too human. Grass’ role was draw out the trauma of genocide repressed in Germany’s collective consciousness.

Fairytale as ambiguous allegory is exemplified in The Rat, in which Grass draws on the tale of the Pied Piper of Hamelin. The Piper seduces and leads innocent children like rats into the shadowy cave. Likewise, Hitler abducted the German people – or at least that’s the story that people would have liked to tell themselves after the war. Grass reminds them they were not blind followers, but complicit perpetrators. And yet as conscience of a nation, Grass also bears his own sins, he too was a complicit perpetrator. While his fantasy and magic can penetrate into memory, it can also obscure it.

Grass’ most pervasive use of fairytales comes in his Danzig trilogy, in particular The Tin Drum, a novel which, like The Flounder and Dog Years, takes place in a world steeped in fairytale, myth, and fable. The protagonist of The Tin Drum, the dwarf Oskar Matzerath, is a living fusion of the fairytale elements of darkness and innocence. Throughout much of the novel he remains a child and so facilitates a unique view of the events of the Nazi period. His appearance of innocence gives him a perspective which allows Grass to present the horror of the period in all its clarity. The fairytale mode of innocence as the way into the sin and savagery is manifested in Oskar’s narration.

Yet Oskar captures another ambiguous role: the dual role played by Grass himself. Oskar is at once outside observer and complicit perpetrator. Grass stood and judged the nation, and at the same time judged himself. The transcendent narrator is an actor in the narrative. Germany’s memory is his memory. In writing on Germany’s sins he seeks his own atonement. Hence the unreliability of Oskar’s story-telling, Grass seeks to simultaneously reveal and conceal the past.

This is the beauty of the fairytale – its allegory allows for deep ambiguity. Meaning is hidden in magic and fantasy. And so in Grass’ novels, the raw and unspeakable brutality of the past must be mediated through symbol. Even in his biography Peeling the Onion, Grass’ presentation of his life is steeped in metaphor and uncertainty. But in that book Grass does honestly peel away the layers, and at last reveals his role in the Waffen SS.

After unveiling the secret he’d kept for over 50 years, Grass was accused of hypocrisy and dissembling self-righteousness. How, it was asked, could he have criticised and judged Germany for all those years, when he too was complicit in the crimes? But Grass was never the objective moral arbitrator. Germany’s story, Oskar’s story, was his story too. His novels allowed him to reflect on Germany’s and his own history. Grass, like Oskar, plays a dual role. In The Tin Drum Oskar’s gang call him Jesus, while he later self-titles himself Satan. Grass’ life too combines sin and atonement.

“We’ve got lots of exciting talent in the team”

0

Sitting down with Sophie Behan, Women’s Rugby Blues captain, it is immediately clear just how seriously her team is taking the Varsity Match, as she hurries in straight from another session at Iffley Gym.

The women are certainly not resting on their laurels after last year’s 3-0 victory over Cambridge, for as Behan is keen to emphasise, every time you step out onto the pitch at Twickenham you have to be prepared: “When you prepare for a game normally it starts on the day, the pressure isn’t there on the pitch. For Varsity, I’ll be getting messages a week before wishing me luck. You stay in a hotel the night before, you’re away from your family and your housemates, there’s photographers and shirt presentations – that all makes it feel very different.”

As captain, she is well aware of her role on the day, helping to keep what can be a very tense, nervous atmosphere, as relaxed as possible: “My job is making it the same – people perform best when it’s what they know, so you minimise what you don’t know. Just don’t let little things throw you off,” she says, “it’s a game of minimising errors, not a game of being perfect.”

Behan emphasises what a talented and hardworking squad she had the privilege of captaining, and her responsibilities are made easier by the fact the side is coached by Gary Street, who won the Women’s Rugby Union World Cup as Head Coach for England in 2014.

Behan highlighted a few of the side’s star performers: “Sophie Trott is obviously one to watch. She was player of the match last year, and is a joy to watch. Johanna Dombrowski was a visiting student from Williams College when she played her first Varsity match and is now at Oxford for a DPhil and is going to be playing in her second Varsity, having come back incredibly strong from an ACL injury.” Pat Metcalfe-Jones is also a standout. The French and Italian student has been training with Harlequins this year as well as balancing a degree and Blues commitments.

Overall, Behan couldn’t be more positive about the Blues chances against a Cambridge side who are currently playing in the division below them, and have not been tested by a top quality team this season.

 

Photo: OURFC

For the men, captain Conor Kearns is keen to stress the challenge the squad faces. Like Behan, he stresses the importance of trying to recreate normality in what can be a disorientating environment for any players who haven’t experienced it before: “you have to just try to stay within the process, trying to maintain consistency will get you as prepared as you possibly can be for such a big occasion.”

Kearns also sings the praises of the benefits the pre-season tour had for creating a great team atmosphere. “Getting away to America was a great opportunity, when we got back we’d begun to mould into the beginnings of a team, and with each successive game we’ve grown closer and now the team has a strong bond.”

He is similarly ebullient about the pleasure of having a team with some great professional experience: “We realise how lucky we are to have these ex-pros in the team, they bring an aspect of professionalism which the younger guys really look up to.”

He is keen to pick out Andy Saull, who made over a hundred club appearances for Saracens, as well as Will Wilson who spent the summer playing with England’s Sevens team.

“We’ve got some really exciting talents and our game plan is to go there and play rugby. With the quality of players we’ve got it would be a disservice not to go out there and try to play attractive rugby.”

It seems like Oxford’s chances of a Varsity double this year are better than ever: the fans should be treated to a fantastic display of high-quality rugby.

Oxford Collage: a human sciences student

0
A self portrait of the human scientist

Q. Talk to me about human sciences.

A. I turned up to Oxford like a biological determinist [I ask what this means]- oh- it means I just thought all human behaviour came down to chemical stuff. All of this came from The Selfish Gene by Richard Dawkins. But soon enough, I realised that not only was I a ‘baby’ in being a fresher and spending most of my time outside Hassan’s but that suddenly everyone felt like babies in this unfolded plasticine: which changes according to the environment and sculpts who you are.

Q. So what have you done with this knowledge?

A. Well I guess I’ve done what I have to do: a dissertation obviously! After changing my mind loads of times I’ve finally decided to look at colonial policy and the environment; specifically how contact with Portuguese colonialists has affected the genomes of Native Americans.

Q. Any fun facts?

A. Native American women could actually own land under the colonial rule rather than necessarily being oppressed by patriarchy as well as colonialism.

Q. Nice, what other things did you enjoy?

A. So I really enjoyed a piece of coursework I did about whether institutional education is oppressive or not. I argued that it contributes to cultural genocides, creating an inferiority complex in the developing world since it is built for Europeans, and simply makes everything euro-focussed. I guess my own experience comes into this when I was working in India last summer. I worked with an NGO that helped children from slums to learn certain skills, and business-related project management. Even though I thought the children benefited a lot, it was still an extremely western style of education!

Q. Would you rather be growing vegetables in an allotment or studying in the Bod then?

A. The allotment, obviously, should be a priority…

Q. How has studying Human Sciences affected your personal life?

A. Well it’s changed it in a way that’s not always convenient. I tend to over analyse relationships and try to fit them into some kind of cultural/genetic complex. But then when it comes to analysing myself, it teaches you to become less hypocritical; especially when it comes down to heated things like cultural appropriation. Then it’s given me a lot of perspective. It reminds me to keep asking ‘why am I worried about little things when there is a whole world of problems out there ?’.

Q. And finally, what is the thing you most like doing in Oxford?

A. Sometimes, when on Broad Street around sunset, stopping to look at the view of the Bodleian as the sun streams down. I think it’s one of the most beautiful (and distracting) views I’ve ever seen.

 

A gendered rewatching of The Silence of the Lambs

0

FBI agent Clarice Starling enters a race against time to catch serial killer ‘Buffalo Bill’ in Jonathan Demme’s The Silence of the Lambs (1991). Twenty five years after winning the ‘Big Five’ at the Oscars, this film remains a landmark cinematic achievement.

Demme immediately posits Clarice (an outstanding Jodie Foster) as a brave, strong, and resourceful protagonist – the film opens with her powering onto the screen as she tackles an assault course. Indeed, despite the vulnerability suggested by Foster’s petite frame, Clarice is tough, underlined through Demme’s close-up of her hands as she climbs over obstacles. Rather than the sexualised images of the female body that routinely dominate cinema, Demme instead showcases female power, and establishes how the film will relentlessly rewrite the dominant gendered characterisations of the action genre.

Clarice uses this resilience to navigate the FBI, which is immediately established as a ‘macho’ domain through the sign on the assault course that reads, “hurt, agony, pain: love it!” Demme repeatedly underlines Clarice’s status as outsider and intruder in this masculine world by framing her alone alongside male colleagues, all of whom tower over her and scrutinise her through their gaze.

Indeed, one extraordinary element of Demme’s direction is his use of extreme close-up point-of view shots, to foreground Clarice’s obectification. As men leer at Clarice, the audience is also forced to become a victim of the assessing and objectifying viewpoint, a position that male viewers are rarely placed in, in society and in Hollywood cinema, which subsequently highlights the subtle, yet relentless ways in which patriarchal society exerts sexual pressures on women. It is these barriers that Clarice forcefully overcomes over the course of the film.

These extreme close-up, point-of view shots are at some of their most powerful and memorable during Clarice’s interviews with Hannibal Lecter (Anthony Hopkins), theinfamous cannibal psychiatrist who becomes her unlikely aid in the hunt for Buffalo Bill. Their first meeting is one of cinema’s greats, as Clarice boldly confronts Lecter’s gaze, causing him to blink and look away first.

From its unforgettable characterisations of Clarice, Lecter and Buffalo Bill, to its innovative camerawork and thrilling plot, over 25 years later, Silence of the Lambs remains unsurpassed in the action genre. As Lecter tells Clarice, “the world’s a more interesting place with you in it,” and the same resoundingly applies to Demme’s masterpiece.