Sunday 26th October 2025
Blog Page 8

How Streamers Use PUBG to Build Loyal Communities

PUBG is one of the most popular games for students, and streamers. It isn’t just a battle royale —it’s a stage. A digital coliseum where streamers rise, viewers roar, and the line between gamer and entertainer gets beautifully blurred. While other titles might offer flashier graphics or faster pacing, PUBG’s tension-filled gameplay gives creators something priceless: time to connect.

In a world where attention spans are shrinking, PUBG lets streamers hold viewers longer by doing something revolutionary—talking. Joking. Teaching. Relating. All while pushing for that glorious Chicken Dinner.

It’s More Than Just Gameplay—It’s Storytelling

What makes a streamer stand out in a sea of players dropping into Erangel or Miramar? It’s not just headshots or clutch revives – it’s storytelling. Every round of PUBG is a new narrative: the hunt for loot, the high-stakes rotations, the chaotic final circles. Viewers aren’t just watching gameplay; they’re riding a wave of suspense.

And savvy streamers use that pacing to their advantage. While looting or scouting the zone, they’re answering chat, cracking jokes, or giving tips. It creates an easy rhythm where the audience doesn’t just feel like spectators—they feel like teammates.

This kind of engagement turns casual viewers into ride-or-die fans. It’s also where in-game currency like PUBG Mobile UC come into play—not just for customizing characters and weapon skins, but as a way for fans to mirror their favorite streamer’s look and vibe. That shared identity? It strengthens the bond even more.

Community First, Content Second

The best PUBG streamers know that performance alone isn’t enough. You don’t have to win every match—but you do have to win hearts. And that’s where building community comes in.

Whether it’s through Discord servers, naming squads after top supporters, or running custom lobbies, PUBG makes it easy to bring fans into the action. Streamers often create inside jokes, signature landing spots, or quirky challenges (pans only, anyone?) that become rituals. These shared experiences are more than content—they’re culture.

Even streamers with modest followings can grow deeply loyal communities by consistently showing up, chatting between games, and shouting out viewers. It’s the personal touches that make all the difference.

PUBG Encourages Collaboration

Another secret to PUBG’s streamer-fueled community magic? It’s built for collaboration. With squad-based modes and duo-friendly mechanics, creators can easily team up with other streamers, fans, or even randomly matched players to keep the content fresh.

These collabs often lead to crossover audiences, shared growth, and moments that go viral—not because of the plays, but because of the personalities. From wholesome revives to spicy betrayals, PUBG provides the sandbox. Streamers just add the spark.

And when viewers see their favorite creators supporting each other and laughing through wins and losses alike, it feels genuine. That authenticity fuels loyalty more than any giveaway or sub goal ever could.

Final Thoughts

At its core, PUBG is more than just a tactical shooter—it’s a relationship builder. Its slower pace, squad dynamics, and unpredictable storytelling make it the perfect playground for streamers looking to turn views into genuine communities.

And if you’re one of those fans looking to gear up like your favourite creator, topping up your PUBG Mobile UC is the way to go.

To read or not to read?

0

It’s 5pm and I’m standing on a packed, unmoving train, somewhere between Swindon and Bristol Parkway, dodging questionable armpits and trying my best to get used to the sardine way of life. The chorus of coughing from the carriage is rapidly becoming a cacophony; the conductor makes a garbled announcement. Outside, fields upon fields of grey, a dreary, flat landscape with nothing to inspire. My spotify offline playlist has been sorely disappointing and, believe it or not, there are only so many Instagram reels a person can consume. 

I glance at the rucksack at my feet. It contains a copy of The Ghost Ship by Kate Mosse, the book I’m reading at the moment. 

Don’t do it, a voice whispers. You’ll be judged, ostracised. You’ll have no choice but to throw yourself off the train. 

That’s slightly ridiculous, I think. Throw myself off a stationary train? It can’t get sadder than that. What’s more, I surely couldn’t get more bored than I am now. Desperate times call for desperate measures. 

Haven’t you ever heard of being performative? the voice says, growing more snarky by the minute. Because that’s what you’ll be. 

It’s a classic battle of wills which I’ve been experiencing lately. To read or not to read, in public? The act has become something of a statement, a declaration that I, with my broken-in paperback, am far superior to all those around me scrolling on their phones or listening to music. What’s more, taking out the other book in my bag, a Latin text I need to read for my course, would be tantamount to laughing in my fellow passengers’ faces. There’s even a question as to whether I am actually reading at all, or just putting on a show for the people around me, who surely can’t have anything better to do than feel threatened by my taste. 

There is inevitably an element of the echo-chamber to this idea. I can’t imagine that people who don’t use the embarrassment-mongering machine that is social media are bothered by how it might appear when the person next to them whips out their edition of The Bell Jar at the bus stop. Moreover, there have definitely been stranger scenes on public transport, and, as long as you’re not performing a dramatic recital of your book, it’s about the least offensive activity you could be doing. 

Then there’s the argument that reading, like scrolling TikTok, is essentially another form of escapism: so why should we judge one more harshly than the other? The point is to transport yourself somewhere else that’s not the cramped environment of a train, to enjoy yourself in a world that’s not your own, but which can be for a brief moment in time. To say that reading is something only for the library, or for the confines of your own home, is to ignore the protean power it has. Reading only in these spaces makes the hobby a private, secretive thing, when, arguably, one of the great things about literature is its connective ability: seeing what other people are reading, and discussing it with them. Or, at the very least, stifling a laugh when the cover of Fifty Shades of Grey peeks up at you from the gap in a duffle bag. Perhaps I’m just nosy, but reading has both an intimate and a social element. 

Of course, there are pretenders out there. The trend of spotting the male manipulator reading in public has become ubiquitous; the criteria has been honed to a tee, and we are warned to watch out for moustache-sporting men reading feminist literature, carrying a tote bag and possibly smoking. Presumably the tote bag is where he conceals his other feminist novels, to keep a rotation going and attract different people, some suggest. It’s possible, though, that he actually does enjoy a bit of Simone de Beauvoir. We’ll never know. And therein lies the third element of reading: its mystery. 

New generation, old hobbies

0

Knitting needles, film photos, vinyl records, and books: what’s the link? You’d be forgiven for answering with “things I might find in my grandma’s house”. But in the last few years, these interests have started to lose their old-fashioned associations, and enter the mainstream, especially among young people. So how do we explain this shift? 

In an increasingly online world, it’s easy to see why young people might be turning to offline hobbies. I don’t mean to sound like I’m wearing a tinfoil hat as I write this, but the integration of phones into every aspect of our daily lives does have its downsides: constant exposure to current affairs, overuse of social media, and too much screen-time in general are all known to negatively impact our brains. It’s understandable that some might want to disconnect, and engage in an activity that doesn’t require wifi.  

These interests also follow a different pace of living to that of today, where it’s possible to take and share photos instantaneously, stream almost any song on demand, and order clothes which arrive barely a day later, all from one device. Within this culture of convenience, there’s something to be said for spending weeks on a crochet project, waiting for photos to be developed, or listening to an entire record from start to finish. That’s not to criticise the convenience of the modern-day (I appreciate next-day delivery as much as the next person), but rather to say that there is a place for delayed gratification alongside it.

It’s also undeniable that these hobbies hold nostalgic value, a source of a lot of their charm. They can feel like a return to a simpler time, when we didn’t have to use Microsoft Authenticator to get into our emails. However, this begs the question: is this really nostalgia? I grew up in a household with CDs and a digital camera, so any vinyl records or film photos belonged to my parents, not to me. Can we call this nostalgia, if we never actually lived through the time in which these things were originally popular?

Alternatively, it may be true that this boost in popularity doesn’t really come from nostalgia, and is instead thanks to the rise of ‘vintage’ aesthetics, which have become widespread in recent years. This has been especially obvious within fashion, where recent trends, like the ‘Y2K’ aesthetic, have been directly inspired by clothes and accessories from past decades. As a result, ‘nostalgic’ interests have therefore become not only popular, but also fashionable. With this shift another reason to partake emerges, beyond simply personal satisfaction: performativity.

The desire to curate a certain aesthetic, and thereby gain social approval, is more prevalent than ever in the age of social media. Taking film photos becomes more about posting them on Instagram afterwards, reading becomes more about looking erudite in public. I would argue that this plays a greater role in our choices than we might like to admit. But it would be cynical to accuse anyone with these hobbies of only doing them for aesthetic reasons, and would it really matter if they did? I’m in no position to pass judgment – I like a ‘grandma’ hobby as much as anyone, and I’ll admit that aesthetics do play a part in that. 

Performative or not, don’t be surprised this term if you see more film photos on your feed, record players in your friends’ rooms, or homemade-looking sweaters out and about. Whatever the reason may be, old-school hobbies are back – and it looks like they’re here to stay. 

Ramen Korner: The souperior choice?

0

Ramen Korner, located on the (you guessed it) corner between the High street and Long Wall street, boasts a striking facade with bold lettering and hanging lanterns, and its manga-inspired aspect immediately catches the eye. When we arrived, the queue forming in the street (they don’t take bookings) seemed a promising testament to its quality; it was bustling with activity, with tables even set up outside the entrance. 

The sister restaurant of Ramen Kulture, the ever-busy hole-in-the-wall on St Giles, Ramen Korner is still in its infancy, having only been opened a couple of months ago after much anticipation. Although it’s not a large establishment, they make good use of space, with small tables dotted like islands, and counter-style seats stretched along the length of the large windows. The aesthetic vision was easily discernible, aiming for an urban, street-food feel, with quirky, disparate adornments. But the lack of decorative cohesion, along with the industrial appearance of the ceiling, did make the interior look a little unfinished.

We take our seats by the window, the perfect spot for people-watching while we enjoy our meal. The menu is straightforward, with small plates, donburi, and, of course, ramen. 

Unlike the original restaurant, Ramen Korner uses chicken broth as the base for all its non-vegetarian soups, appealing to customers who don’t eat pork products. Yet the paucity of vegetarian dishes, and the singular vegan option, was disappointing.

The Miso Tofu Ramen was topped with beansprouts, shimeji mushrooms, sweetcorn, tenderstem broccoli, and ginger. The fried tofu, although well-cooked, sat rather slab-like on top of the dish, and became somewhat of a chore to get through. The ratio struck me as a little off – the layer of toppings, while visually attractive and aesthetically varied, was barely more than surface level, just covering a fathomless depth of unadorned noodles. As a whole, the dish relied almost entirely on the broth for flavour, which, with a rich umami taste, would have elevated the meal if only there were more of it. It resembled a sauce more than a soup, and I was grateful for the soy sauce and chilli oil provided on the table, without which the keynote of the dish would have been banality. We also ordered the Ma-Po Chicken Donburi, a marked improvement in terms of its level of flavour (although the menu’s spice warning turned out to be unnecessary).The Sichuan sauce was delicious, but, again, formed only a layer covering a disproportionate amount of rather plain rice. 

The service was quick and attentive, and the overall dining experience was enjoyable. But our high expectations were deflated: we were left with the regrettable impression that its effective marketing failed to make up for the mediocrity of its quality. 

What we ate:

Miso Tofu Ramen (£13.50), Ma-Po Chicken Donburi (£14.90), Iced Green Tea (£3.95)

Oxford University Hospitals included in nationwide maternity review

0

Oxford University Hospitals (OUH) is one of 14 NHS trusts to be included in a “rapid national investigation” of maternity and newborn care in England, the government announced last month. The trust, which administers the John Radcliffe Hospital, and three other hospitals in and around Oxford, will face scrutiny over the quality and safety of its maternity services.

The review was first announced by Health Secretary Wes Streeting in June. It follows several independent inquiries over the last ten years which have revealed serious failings in maternity care and pointed to persistent failures to listen to patient concerns. In response, the government says that the review will put affected families at “the heart of the work”.

Families Failed by OUH Maternity Services, a campaign representing more than 620 affected families, say they welcome OUH’s inclusion in the review. Their co-founder Rebecca Matthews said: “For 15 months, our inbox has been flooded with stories of shockingly poor and negligent care at OUH. These include accounts of stillbirth, of babies with brain injuries, and women with long-lasting physical and psychological injuries as a result of failings in the maternity care they received.”

Matthews alleged that “many of these outcomes have been the result of a failure by OUH staff to identify or act on problems during pregnancy or labour”.

The investigation will be led by Baroness Valerie Amos, who said: “We will pay particular attention to the inequalities faced by Black and Asian women and by families from marginalised groups, whose voices have too often been overlooked.” 

The rate of maternal mortality among Black women in the UK is nearly three times that among white women. Women from Asian ethnic backgrounds are nearly twice as likely as white women to die during pregnancy.

Baroness Amos’ investigation is set to deliver interim findings in December. The tight time frame set for the review has sparked criticism. A statement by Families Failed by OUH Maternity Services said: “[I]t’s not the public inquiry that we ultimately need.”

Simon Crowther, Acting Chief Executive Officer at OUH, told Cherwell: “This review is an important step in a national effort to improve maternity care across the NHS. We are committed to playing our part in this journey – with openness, transparency, and a relentless focus on the safety and wellbeing of every woman and baby in our care.”

Layla Moran, MP for Oxford West and Abingdon and Chair of the Health and Social Care Select Committee, was approached but was unavailable for comment.

The Oxford Art Calendar: Michaelmas 2025

0

Autumn in Oxford is not only golden leaves, dark academia, and beautiful architecture – Michaelmas is also a season of creativity. The start of the new academic year simultaneously marks a vibrant start time for art exhibitions: from major retrospectives, to novel voices, to printmaking. Cherwell has curated a calendar of highlight events to look out for…

Pat Suet-Bik Hui & The Three Perfections

20 Sep 2025 to 28 Jun 2026, Ashmolean

三絕’ embodies the tradition of what’s considered in China to be the three highest art forms: poetry, calligraphy, and painting, known as the three perfections. The Ashmolean presents both early examples from the 17th century onwards, as well as the works of Hong Kong artist Hui and her contemporaries. The exhibition provides visitors the necessary space and context to view the dialogue between the disciplines. Seeing the way calligraphic strokes interact with paintings, and the reimagined and thematically diverse poetry, is a vibrant antidote to fall blues. 

This Is What You Get

06 Aug 2025 to 11 Jan 2026, Ashmolean

If you’re seeking a subject a bit closer to home (home being Oxford) then head to the top floor, for a major exhibition exploring the collaboration between Stanley Donwood, and Thom Yorke of Radiohead. From initial album cover mock ups, to unpublished lyrics in their sketchbooks, this is an iconic tribute to the band, which formed in mid 80s Oxfordshire. It is the ideal chance to look back at the group’s music, but also the creative process behind their hits. Note: the exhibition requires advanced booking. Cherwell has already been to take a look at the display, so make sure to read our review before visiting yourself.

Suzanne Treister: Prophetic Dreaming

04 Oct 2025 to 12 Apr 2026, Modern Art Oxford

Nostalgic reminiscing aside, it’s also time to embrace modernity. Seeing the radical para-disciplinary artist Suzanne Treister’s major retrospective is the solution. From embracing new technology to exploring potential futures, the exhibition welcomes the artist’s time-travelling alter ego Rosalind Brodsky, Tarot decks, and machine intelligence. Her newest projects collaborate with local quantum physicists in the form of a walking tour across five city sites, allowing you to travel without leaving the comfort of Pembroke Street. 

The Printmaker’s Eye

28 Nov 2025 to 03 Jan 2026, The North Wall

The open access Fine Art Print workshop known as the Oxford Printmakers Co-Operative (OPC) is exhibiting a new range of handmade prints, along with an insight into the process – relief prints, monotypes, and lithographs. The vibrant creativity is a welcome reprieve from a long term, and the perfect opportunity to find a Christmas gift.

Imagining Wolsey: The Invention of an English Cardinal

18 Jun 2025 to 22 Dec 2025, Christ Church Picture Gallery

Catch the last of Rome A Cardinal’s Dream up to the 20th October, visualising the Roman drawings of Wolsey’s time, and then head to the 500th anniversary exhibition in honour of the Cardinal and founder of Christ Church. Tudor oil paintings, representations in Hilary Mantel’s iconic Wolf Hall: this is the exhibition to see if you want traditional portraits, canonical artists, and modern reinterpretations.

Oxford brings old masters and emerging talent together, from the Ashmolean’s awe inspiring halls, to the welcoming gleam of Oxford’s Modern Art haven. The months from autumn to winter pulse with creative energy, and Cherwell hopes you’ll find an event to spark your interest and inspire you. We eagerly await your thoughts, submissions and reviews.

Fancy reviewing one of these events? Contact us at [email protected] for more information.

A tale of two venues: Oxford’s musical legacies

0

Oxford is a city full of firsts – historical, personal, degree class, and musicological. Two of its music venues, separated by about 250 years of history and a walk of less than half an hour, show their pasts and personalities in convenient opposition.

I’d passed that austere, white-faced building with temple-like pediments on Holywell Street dozens of times, and always assumed it was a church. When I first stepped inside Wadham College’s Holywell Music Room, it was only the band playing J-pop where the altar should be that swayed me. With its aforementioned exterior (classical, grand, worshipful), its tiered rows of not-quite pews (absent kneelers) seated around a large clearing, and its organ (likely Dutch, 18th century) against its candid white walls, the space doesn’t do much to distinguish itself as a music venue built for the purpose – Europe’s very first, in fact.

Holywell Music Room’s construction began in 1742, before its opening in 1748. Its design was by Revd Dr Thomas Camplin, then Vice Principal of St Edmund’s Hall, later Archdeacon of Taunton. Despite being the first of its kind in the continent, it corporeally echoes its spiritual predecessors. Classical music previously tended to be played publicly in churches, and privately in the homes of the aristocracy. This, alongside its architect’s clerical associations, led Nikolaus Pevsner, 20th century historian of art and architecture, to declare that it “looks exactly like a large Nonconformist chapel”.

An atmosphere of propriety lent by its lengthy history and religious design hangs heavily over the room, along with two chandeliers donated by King George IV that were present at his coronation. While these airs help shush the audience into quiet reverence, it also stifles any response besides polite clapping.

Earlier this year, I watched as Sentacki filled the Music Room with covers of the J-pop musicians Vaundy, Fujii Kaze, and the band King Gnu, among others. Their energy was stunning, playing extended runs of technically skilful yet still playful instrumentals alongside impassioned, smooth vocals. I couldn’t help but feel, however, that the soundscape distinctly lacked much of the usual gig noise of excited chatter or singing along. While the latter might have had a language barrier to blame, the former was especially obvious in the near silence that settled between songs, in spite of the lead singer’s stage banter.

The venue seems to intentionally lend itself more to classical performances, where silence from the benches would be more suitable. The band’s infectious joy did manage to win some audience participation towards the end, though, as they turned the mic towards the audience for some repeated vocal fills – a manoeuvre that worked even better at a different venue.

Halfway along Walton Street, the Jericho Tavern sits a 20 minute walk away from the Music Room (unthinkably long in Oxford terms). Despite its relative youth, its history and contribution to wider culture is also significant, having hosted the first live performance of Radiohead (then named On A Friday) in 1986, and the record deal-securing performance of Supergrass in 1994. In fact, I would argue the cultural relevance of their firsts are even greater than Holywell’s. My companion let me know that Radiohead fact before, on our way to, and after a gig there, while literally no one has ever mentioned any of the comparatively abundant trivia about the Music Room.

Here, later on in the same week as their Holywell performance, Sentacki’s energy and noise was much more reciprocated by the crowd. This time, the shout of “Nan-Nan” they asked for during a cover of Fujii Kaze’s similarly titled song was picked up eagerly and without embarrassment by the crowd, comfortable in the pit.

The first floor music venue is quite intimate. Its dark blue walls and length in comparison to its thinness leave the raised stage floating as a lone hypnotic light at the end of a long tunnel. The bar at the back acts much the same if you turn around.

On the ground floor, the Jericho doesn’t forget it’s a pub. The large bar, pool table, and beer garden keep it humble despite the echoes of legends from upstairs. A plaque epitomises the fundamental differences in vibe. It boasts of hosting Supergrass and hangs indoors now after an attempted theft in 2019. The item speaks to the Jericho’s past both as a venue and as a place. The Jericho proudly embraces its history and character; the plain Holywell Music Room seems to politely decline showing much of either, despite an abundance of both.

These are just two almost arbitrarily chosen places in Oxford. Every building in the ancient city holds such a wealth of history and spirit. What many of them lack, however, is the emotional catalyst of live performance. Musicians on stage make the building resonate with the music’s emotion through the vibrations of their playing and the audience’s synchronised movements. This driver helps link physicality with feeling, building relationships between people and places, and shaping this raw history into character.

The Museum of Oxford celebrates city life in ‘Our Oxford: 50 Years, 50 Stories’

0

The Museum of Oxford, situated in the Town Hall, is celebrating its 50th birthday. As part of the occasion, they opened late on the 26th September to commemorate the completion of their new exhibition, Our Oxford: 50 Years, 50 Stories, co-curated by the local community. The exhibition highlights 50 different experiences of the city, using personal memories and experiences to create a window into Oxford life, both past and present.

Since opening in 1975, the Museum of Oxford has focused on sharing the story of the city. It was taken over by the Oxford City Council in the 1990s, saved from closure by the Oxford Civic Society in the 2000s, and renovated in 2018 through a National Lottery Heritage Fund grant. Reopening in 2021, the redevelopment increased the size of the galleries and collection, and since then they have welcomed thousands of visitors and hosted hundreds of events.

Their new exhibition is a community-woven archive of Oxford life. One highlight was a series of oral history transcripts, accessed via an old-fashioned landline, which ranged from childhood recollections of Cheney School in the 1950s, to memories of the Jolly Farmer pub and shops along the Cowley Road during the mid-to-late 20th century. Current school children chose a wooden toy train from the 1930s to be put on display, indicating parallels between their own childhoods and those from almost a hundred years earlier. The Museum even commissioned a Community Quilt, created by local artist E West, as a response to the 50 stories brought together through the project.

Scott, a volunteer at the museum, pointed Cherwell to his favourite piece: ‘Frozen lightning’ from the Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, which shows electrical discharges given off by radiation. Rachel, another volunteer at the museum, added that her item of choice detailed the development of Oxford marmalade, with the display on the Morris Car Factory a close second because “it shows that Oxford was a really good centre of manufacturing for quite a long time”. She went on to add: “This exhibition is a way of getting everybody involved…180 people have signed up to come this evening.”

The event was indeed busy. Live acoustic music from Mayura echoed throughout the galleries, bringing a sense of occasion to the night. Downstairs, there was drop-in zine making with Imperfect Bound, an Oxford-based queer zine collective, where we were encouraged to create a mini magazine of what Oxford meant to us. You could also make your own badges, and watch a short film screening of ‘10 Voices’ by the Shadowlight Artists, a collective of local creatives with learning disabilities. 

By assembling the stories of the city into Our Oxford: 50 Years, 50 Stories, the Museum of Oxford not only memorialises its own past, but also that of the local community, creating a space that brings people together to celebrate their diverse experiences of life in our city.

Our Oxford: 50 Years, 50 Stories is open until the 3rd of January 2026. More details can be found here.

Why all this fuss about ‘Wuthering Heights’?

0

Emerald Fennell’s Wuthering Heights, Netflix’s Pride and Prejudice, Greta Gerwig’s Narnia, HBO’s Harry Potter. All these adaptations of well-loved literary classics are currently in production, and, along with other fans of the novels, I have eagerly awaited each new detail of plot changes and casting choices. Yet the original novels of Emily Brontë, Jane Austen, C.S Lewis, and J.K. Rowling have already gone through multiple adaptation cycles, from screen to stage to fiction. Why do these works spawn so many descendants, and haven’t we maybe seen enough of them already?

We can easily – if perhaps cynically – feel that these adaptations are symptomatic of late-stage capitalism. Harry Potter, for instance, is ultimately a product with seemingly limitless earning potential for companies such as Warner Brothers. Or do these cycles of adaptation reveal a dearth in creativity: is it simply easier to sell audiences on something they already know? In an age of doom-scrolling, rapidly declining attention spans, and AI-assisted search engines, are these seemingly endless cycles of adaptations, paid for and provided by media giants, the only literary consumption contemporary readers can engage in? 

Well, perhaps. But these adaptations also stem from a cultural precedent that can be traced back to the writers of the classical world.

The ancient Greek poet Bacchylides wrote: “one learns his skill from another, both long ago and now.” Imitatio in the ancient world was a rhetorical practice where work which most closely resembled previous masters of the genre was a sign of the author’s literary skill and cultural value. In this world, imitation was not only the sincerest form of flattery but the highest form of art.

It was partly through imitatio that Chaucer established English as part of the great literary tradition. Chaucer’s long poems ‘The Book of the Duchess’ and ‘The Parliament of Fowls’ make use of passages from Cicero and Ovid, reworking the same material and yet creating something new. These poems involve the “long ago” of the classical world as much as they do the English literature Chaucer was helping to create. The “now” of Bacchylides is then in some ways applicable to our current literary moment, with producers such as Gerwig and Fennell reworking the rich ground left by earlier authors.

But what is it that makes these books so adaptable, so readily reworked, and offered up to each new generation? Again, the answer seems to contradict underlying cultural assumptions of what makes works of literature valuable.

All four works are genre fiction: Wuthering Heights is a gothic novel, Pride and Prejudice a romantic comedy, Harry Potter and The Chronicles of Narnia fantasy. The primary audience of Austen and Brontë are women; of Rowling and Lewis, children. While our image of cultural taste-makers might be, predictably, a group of old white men with so-called ‘serious’ fiction, it is the literary favourites of women and children that have proved to be most enduring. 

Yet as much as literary adaptations shake prescribed cultural values, they can also do their part to enforce them. Several rumours surrounding Fennell’s Wuthering Heights have caused outrage amongst fans of the book, ranging from a rather sexually explicit opening scene to an anachronistic wedding dress more suited to the 1980s than the 1810s. More insidious is her decision to cast Jacob Elordi, star of Fennell’s Saltburn, in the role of Heathcliff. Brontë’s Heathcliff is more than a needlessly broody Byronic figure. Adopted amongst the trading ports of Liverpool, a character in the novel wonders where Heathcliff “[came] from, the little dark thing?”. The Heathcliff that appears in Brontë’s Wuthering Heights is heavily suggested to be non-white. Elordi’s Heathcliff, not so much. 

Wuthering Heights has always been the subject of controversy: contemporary papers even called the novel “semi-savage”. Yet it is sadly ironic that it seems Fennell’s adaptation has side-lined one of the most truly confronting things in the novel. While I will join many others in the cinema this Valentine’s Day to watch Fennel’s adaptation, I will also reread the original, appreciating Brontë’s text as the soil upon which each adaptation has grown. While modern adaptations allow us to rediscover well-loved classics with new eyes, not every decision they make is an improvement on the original.

Oxford announces changes to postgraduate research examinations from 2025

0

Oxford University has confirmed that new rules for postgraduate research (PGR) examinations will take effect from Michaelmas term. The reforms, which apply to all students submitting their thesis for the first time on or after 12th October, are intended to clarify outcomes, standardise procedures, and align Oxford’s regulations with those of other UK universities.

One of the adjustments is the extension of the timeframe for “minor corrections”. At present, students given this outcome have one month to resubmit their corrected thesis; from 2025, this will be extended to two months. The University has also announced that extensions will no longer be available for either minor or major corrections, with only exceptional circumstances considered by the Education Committee.

The category of “major corrections” is also being revised. In future, examiners will be able to recommend either major corrections with a further viva or major corrections without one – a distinction that the University says will provide greater clarity for both students and examiners.

Other changes include a reduction in the timeframe for the “reference back” outcome, which currently allows two years for resubmission but will be shortened to one year. New “indicative criteria” will also be introduced to guide examiners in deciding outcomes, with the aim of ensuring greater consistency across departments.

The reforms further clarify expectations around supervision. Students who set major corrections or reference back should continue to receive the same level of supervision as before submitting their thesis. In addition, candidates who are unable to make progress due to illness or other time-limited reasons may apply for a suspension of up to twelve months, provided it is at least four weeks in length.

The University has explained that the reforms follow a review process which began in 2019, and that the aim is to improve clarity and support while ensuring that Oxford’s framework remains comparable with national standards. For students on research master’s programmes, such as the MLitt or MSc(Res), the changes will also introduce the possibility of “major corrections with mandatory viva”, bringing their regulations into closer alignment with those for doctoral degrees.

The timing of implementation means that different students will be affected differently. Those who submit their thesis on or before 11th October will be examined under the existing rules, while those who submit on or after 12th October will be subject to the new system.

The University has acknowledged that the reforms will require adaptation by both students and supervisors, but emphasised that the changes are intended to make the examination process more transparent and predictable. While the removal of extensions may pose challenges in some cases, the longer period for minor corrections, the introduction of clearer criteria, and the option of suspension are expected to provide additional support for candidates.

These revisions mark the first major update to PGR examination outcomes at Oxford in several years. The University has stated that it will continue to provide guidance to departments and students ahead of the changes coming into effect in Michaelmas.