Tuesday, May 13, 2025
Blog Page 815

Oxford worst UK city for bike theft

0

Oxford is the biggest bicycle theft hot spot in Britain, a survey has revealed.

Out of the 30 UK university towns and cities evaluated by a Hiplok survey, Oxford ranked highest in bike related crimes.

In the year to May 2017, 932 incidents of bicycle theft were reported to police in the Oxford city area. The second highest location for bike theft, Cambridge, saw nearly 700 bike-related crime reports over the same period.

In 2016, 17% of working residents in the city cycled to work regularly. According to national cycle database Bike Register, over 4000 bike thefts were reported in the city last year. Belinda Hopkins, Crime Prevention and Reduction Advisor at Oxford’s Security Services, said that in the last five years, bike crime has risen significantly.

Hopkins commented: “We have installed surveillance cameras in all the top hotspots for bike theft, and have about twelve security officers a day patrolling these areas. Several thieves have been caught so far, but I don’t know what the police are going to do about it at this point.

“The majority of these incidents would be preventable, if people knew how to properly lock their bike. That means having a metal D-lock and locking the back wheel and frame to the pole.”

Earlier this year, an Oxford resident was caught with a stash of a 164 stolen bicycles in his backyard.

New College student Michael Rope told Cherwell: “A while back I left my bike locked up outside Tesco on Magdalen Street. I was only in there for ten minutes, but came out and saw someone hacking at my lock – I couldn’t get there quickly enough.”

As an additional safety precaution, Security Services have teamed up with Bike Register, where students can register their vehicles and change their status from “sold” to “stolen” accordingly. This method involved fitting QR coded stickers to the registered bicycle, so that it can always be tracked.

Drunk Tory official defaces church

An appointed committee member of the Oxford University Conservative Association (OUCA) was suspended last term after an act of drunken vandalism.

Following OUCA’s weekly Port and Policy event, at which the individual in question served port, he and two accomplices crossed St Giles’ road, climbed the flag pole of the Oratory Church, and tore down its papal flag.

The incident has sparked allegations of prevalent anti-Catholicism within the Assocation.

The Oratory Church refused to publicly comment, with multiple members of the church expressing an attitude of forgiveness towards the individual.

The individual was immediately suspended from OUCA by then-President William Rees-Mogg. The morning after the incident the individual attended mass, apologised profusely to a priest, and left his contact details, apparently at the request of OUCA committee members.

He has reportedly agreed to pay for the re-attaching of the flag to the pole, which at the time of print is yet to occur.

Speaking anonymously, the individual expressed regret, telling Cherwell: “This was a personal mistake and not indicative of the University or of OUCA”.

A former OUCA Political Officer said: “This is a microcosm of the abuse and debauchery at the top of OUCA. It is shameful that such anti-Catholic sentiment runs rife, especially from an unelected member personally appointed by William Rees-Mogg – a president whose primary wish was to protect his surname.”

Another OUCA member remarked that ‘Papist’ was regularly tossed about as an insult at Port and Policy, while the loyalty of Catholics towards the monarchy was frequently questioned. He commented that “by an eighth week Port and Policy, anti-Catholicism is pretty widespread”.

While acknowledging that ‘papist’ is used as an insult, Rees-Mogg strongly denied the allegations of anti-Catholicism. He told Cherwell: “I was of course deeply shocked to hear what had happened on that evening, and at once suspended the person in question. Such behaviour has no place within the modern Conservative movement.

“As a confirmed and practising Catholic myself I do wholeheartedly agree with the sentiment given by the Oratory, that the individual, having apologised, and paid from his own pocket for the flag’s replacement, should be forgiven and allowed to move on”.

“I’m also a little confused about the above claims of a rise in anti-Catholic sentiment within OUCA. If such a sentiment exists it seems odd to me that I should not have encountered it during two years of involvement within the society.

“I certainly do not think that the use of terms such as ‘papist’ should be taken to heart any more than friendly cries of sound and shame. My accuser, being an ex-member of committee, also knows full well that he was welcome to attend the meeting at which I proposed the individual become a committee member (an event which passed with no objections).

“I will admit that, like most people, I do tend to try to avoid my name being blackened unfairly, especially in circumstances where I have not actually done anything wrong.

“I’m only sorry that my accuser has decided to be quite so openly vile, while making sure to protect his own anonymity. He is of course welcome to come forward and address his concerns to me in public”.

Another member of OUCA, speaking anonymously, told Cherwell: “It’s a source of great puzzlement to me, but there seem to be people with little better to do than go after William Rees-Mogg via the rumour mill and the press.

“Anyone who has met him knows he has done nothing to deserve it.”

The incident follows a confidential Conservative Party report leaked to the media which suggested moving “risky student politics” completely out of the official party structure.

By integrating Conservative Future branches within local associations, the party hope to “bring the youth wing firmly into the mainstream Party”.

It comes after a wave of recent student Tory scandals, such as reports of student Tories at St Andrews setting fire to an effigy of Obama.

Earlier this year, a member of the Cambridge University Conservative Association suspended his studies after a video emerged of him burning a £20 note in front of a homeless man. The student has since resumed his studies.

The Oratory Church declined to comment.

Exiled from Oxford but learning from the city

0

In Tove Jansson’s Moomin comic strip one moomin calls to a fox “I only want to live in peace and plant potatoes and dream”.

It’s around 8:30 pm on a bright, sharp July evening to end my first week as a worker in a tiny outpost of Jämtland, Western Sweden. As I look up at the homestead, away from the thistly stretch and huge pearl-like daisies which lead away from the lake, it strikes me that this is the most countryside I’ve touched in my whole year as a member of the exclusive club for rusticated students.

Of course, to ‘rusticate’ is quite literally to “stay or live in the countryside”, and indeed an Oxford English Dictionary search will reveal that the term was used in that sense for a few hundred years before making its way in around the 18th century to the academic departments of certain upstanding universities, to be used regarding experiences of a slightly less picturesque tone. The two definitions clearly overlapped during that time.

The erstwhile compiler of the Dictionary of the English Language, Samuel Johnson, mused on its benefits in 1783 after a short sojourn in Kent, writing: “Whether this short rustication has done me any good I cannot tell”. I should like to definitively report my feelings as being more positive on the topic of whether my rustication has “done me any good”.

The term has since branched out, but it has never shaken off the meaning of being dismissed from the University of either Oxford, Durham or Cambridge, to sit at home and reflect on your self-worth, right of existence, and crushing sense of failure.

When I was introduced to this concept last Michaelmas, after being hauled in on a November morning to “discuss my future”, I couldn’t escape the image of an apparition, proclaiming my doom with the wag of a finger as it “sent me back to the country”.

As a person who lives and breathes poetry, I was intrigued to find that many notable people who rusticated in the past do seem to be poets – I’m not entirely sure whether that should be concerning, or comforting.

The Oxford English Dictionary cites ‘rustication’ as “temporary dismissal from a university suspension”, but these are not entirely the same thing. My suspension – the official term under which I agreed to leave Oxford for a year – was not a punishment, and nor was it much of a choice.

This difference in terminology seems to be one that non-Oxford alumni are more aware of than we are – on mentioning my rustication once to a Tinder match, I was asked, in some mixture of consternation and admiration, what I’d done to merit it. Here in Oxford the word ‘rustication’ serves for every circumstance: we need psychologically to separate the miscreants of latter days from people for whom a break is the only option.

Water Enough

CORYDON: You mean you’d let the sheep / Go thirsty? THYRSIS: Well, they’re not my sheep. My sheep have water enough. Edna St Vincent Millay, Aria da Capo

With this in mind, I had a look at the measures with which the University endeavours to offer support to students at risk of ‘suspending’. If I was looking for something to warm the cockles, I was disappointed. Rifling through the few resources available, I found a podcast which, if John Milton had heard it as he was preparing to suspend, may just have induced him to leave the University and not come back.

It seems unfair to imply that everyone who is thinking about rusticating could continue if they really tried (we’re English, don’t you know?). The examples given didn’t help, with the podcast citing “can’t bear to see your ex around” as one potential catalyst for rustication. Of course, there are extreme instances of everything, but in general I found the podcast sadly patronising – trying, but missing the mark.

Milton was rusticated by force because he fell out so severely with his tutor. There are more modern (and more publicised) horror stories of people who are not desirous of rustication and are unhappy with their treatment. I don’t deny that some people are treated unfairly, but many complaints seem to me to be either undervaluing the support of the college, or expecting too much. I recognise that it would be excellent if colleges gave continued support on some level, but wasn’t personally shocked at having certain privileges withdrawn. I would not expect an extra year’s full support on top of my degree.

Whatever students feel about how their college handled their suspension, it is nothing short of a miracle that the structure here is such that a student will be missed if they fail to materialise to their classes. The tutors and medical staff at other colleges may not be as supportive as mine were, but it’s significantly better than in other institutions where the option of rustication simply doesn’t exist.

Many question why the University doesn’t address the amount of people rusticating (1183 in 2013/14 alone, out of around 22,300 undergraduates) – if we’re all falling apart at the hands of the system, shouldn’t it stop bearing down on its errant children with a leather strap and try working out what it might be doing wrong? This would be an easy stance to take, but this environment is both infamous and celebrated for its pressured nature. Most Oxford students I know are incredibly driven, and thrive off making the most out of their studies. Therefore, although it is concerning that we take the number of people dropping out and rusticating as almost a given, the University could begin with recognising that right now this is a reality, and that they can help.

To my mind the University of Oxford should bring in more support resources at the university wide tier, above and beyond other institutions. I am lucky that I don’t need much continued support, but there are many students who would benefit from a more open source of help.

Preventive measures are a different affair, but it is vital that Oxford learns how to help those, who do choose to rusticate, more effectively.

City of Aquatint

Oxford, in those days, was still a city of aquatint. In her spacious and quiet streets men walked and spoke as they had done in Newman’s day; her autumnal mists, her grey springtime, and the rare glory of her summer days. Evelyn Waugh, Brideshead Revisited

I’m glad rustication was a complete surprise to me, otherwise I might well have joined the sad subjects of the podcast, so torn with the idea of rusticating that they’re put in a sort of academic paralysis.

When I agreed to rusticate, I had no concept of what the next year would entail – one of my least perfect qualities probably being an inability (or unwillingness) to look very far ahead.

As it transpired, before I caught the overnight train to Östersund and discovered the therapeutic power of summer strawberries and the not-so-therapeutic power of nastily overpriced Swedish beer, I took a mysteriously cheap room in Jericho and worked in Oxford for several months. I am a creature of habit, despite – or perhaps because of – my slightly unhabitual background, and I enjoyed immensely being based in one place for an entire half year, as well as seeing another side of Oxford life.

I may not have backpacked around Southeast Asia (although my ability to sniff out all good sources of organic tofu within a five mile radius might have you fooled), but I have been on a type of journey. When I left, I spent a long time attempting to dissect exactly why I was so unmotivated about my degree. Why did I no longer care about my subject?

Every subject offered at Oxford had some desirable quality which English, my subject, was lacking, and which I suddenly desperately needed in my life – from PPE to Geography to Chemistry, to packing it in and fleeing to a hermitage on the Arctic Circle (although I did at least do that).

During the PPE phase, my dad rather bluntly suggested that I “stick to what I do best”. At the time I was annoyed, but he had a point: you don’t prove things by wanting to prove them, and there is no shame in beginning with what you know. This year I’ve not only started to prove things, but to realise for myself what it is I want to achieve.

Moreover, I needed my year to really love and make my peace with doing English. You don’t have to be a chemist or historian – or even an undergraduate – to see the many variables and factors that go into making a person who they are.

We are all complicated mixtures of influences, motivations, and emotions and it’s a bonus when you realise you can find them all in your own subject, if you only know where to look. Taking some time away from the subject made me fall in love again with English.

The phrase “rus in urbe” sounds similar to rustication, but has been in existence for the best part of two millennia, generally describing a patch of city land that evokes the feeling of the country.

I found my own rus in urbe in Oxford: among the complex layers of experiences I had and witnessed, the people I met, and the history rooted in the stonework of the city, I found not only the sleepiness of my own Yorkshire town, but the vivacity of London, where I spent a large part of my childhood – and when I went back to them, I appreciated the beauty of both all the more.

What You Leave Behind

What you leave behind is not what is engraved in stone monuments, but what is woven into the lives of others. Pericles

Growing up, I was barely aware of what ‘Oxford’ meant, and my whole impression was based on Brideshead Revisited (although let’s be honest, I will never stop modelling myself on Sebastian Flyte). I was truly privileged by then having the extra space to live there – with time to think about who I am in a place where every part of me is accepted, and to realise that the University of Oxford is where I want to be, something I did not feel when I started in October 2016.

Working full time and studying for the coming year (not to mention standing at the outskirts, looking on at my friends being progressively fed into the fire of Academic Life), was hard, but it prepared me much better than anything had heretofore for the grilling that is to come.

I was initially asked to write on my unique perspective of rustication, having experienced Oxford life from both ‘the outside’ and ‘the inside’. An example topic was suggested: “Was rustication worth it?” It might have been the beer and the late hour, but trying to make sense of my own answer to this led me to the following conclusion.

To be worthy is to have intrinsic value: if it was worth it, what did I exchange for that worth? In financial terms, where was the return on my investment?

Suspending my studies was a decision on paper, but my tutor and I agreed that it was not a choice, if I didn’t want to jeopardise my studies. Therefore the question is futile: what happened, happened.

A better way of measuring my year’s worth is through gratitude, because (aside from finally learning how to boil an egg) that is the greatest skill I’ve gained.

I’m not endorsing the wringing of hands and proclaiming that everything is wonderful. Gratitude to me is complaining about your morning tute on the way to Bridge, but still turning up at 9am sharp. It’s savouring the taste of your food, or going for a quick coffee with someone you haven’t seen in a while.

It’s remembering that your life is precious enough to live it in ways that fulfil you the most, regardless of how easy it would be to waste it. Many people, including myself, have doubts about their own capabilities – how could you not, when you’ve just spent £4,500 of great potential on the privilege of lying in somebody else’s bed, staring at somebody else’s wall?

Now, though, I know that I am capable. My nine months out were worth it, because I grew, and I learnt to be grateful – for what the world and the people in it can give, and for what I can give in return.

University democracy “hasn’t been working well”, says Louise Richardson

0

Oxford vice-chancellor Louise Richardson has sharply criticised the university’s system of democratic self-governance, blaming a lack of engagement from staff for
its failings.

Currently less than 10% of university committee positions are contested, meaning that figures advising on areas from finance to Oxford’s “educational philosophy” face little risk of being challenged for their post.

A meeting of Congregation, the University’s ultimate legislative body, was called during last Trinity after 20 members signed a motion calling for the move. Of the over 5,000 academic and research support staff eligible to attend, just nine did. Three quarters of the motion’s signatories were not present, while just four spoke.

In her annual Oration to Congregation last week, Richardson said that this state of affairs, “is not an example of a well-functioning system, or wise use of scarce resources.”

While stating that Oxford’s democracy is one of its “rare and admirable attributes” and “a wonderful ideal”, she indicated that staff must begin to engage more closely with it and to avoid using it as “a mechanism for the promotion of self-interest”.

Richardson’s critique of “self-interest” comes as part of a broadside against those protesting the introduction at Oxford of an age limit for academics.

Following the government’s abolition of a national default retirement age, Oxford introduced an Employer-Justified Retirement Age (EJRA) of 68. This met with fierce protest from older academics, and support from younger fellows who characterised the issue as one of intergenerational justice.

Professor Peter Edwards of Oxford’s Chemistry Department questioned whether it was appropriate for the Vice-Chancellor to make such comments, writing in a letter set to be published in Oxford Magazine and seen by Cherwell: “Can it be acceptable for the Vice- Chancellor to make what appears to be a blatantly ‘ageist’ remark by criticising the ‘self-interest’ of those querying the University’s decision to claim exception from equality legislation in this respect?

“And what of younger colleagues who have expressed equally legitimate concerns about the EJRA? Will the University assign a critical age above which a legitimate ‘concern’ transitions to an unreasonable ‘self-interest?’”

Richardson went on to say that she sought to “plead with those who last term lost six votes on the subject of the EJRA to abide by the expressed preference of their colleagues and let the issue rest until the next review, scheduled in four years’ time”.

She compared the continued struggle by EJRA opponents to that of Remainers and Hillary voters, arguing that while they lost “as democrats they accepted the decision”.

Professor Edwards however described these comments as “simply incorrect and misleading”.

He told Cherwell: “There was only one resolution to Congregation specifically targeted to the abolition of the EJRA… that was the resolution on 16 May 2017 proposed by Sir John Ball and seconded by Professor Paul Ewart.”

Edwards claimed that the other votes were in fact on “tangential issues”, such as “procedural issues and in particular governance in relation to the EJRA”.

The last major attempt to reform Oxford’s ancient and complex governing structures was under the Vice-Chancellorship of John Hood, from 2004 to 2009.

Hood – who came to the post from business rather than academia, as is typical – sought to end Oxford’s 900-year-old tradition of complete self-governance by introducing ‘external members’ to council, the executive body elected by Congregation. In this way Hood hoped that corporate management principles might be brought into Oxford’s governance, saving money and time.

Lord Patten, Oxford’s Chancellor then and now, defended the move, telling the BBC that reforms were necessary to ensure that private money could be raised, and children from deprived backgrounds helped.

Hood’s proposals were, however, defeated even in an amended form, largely due to Congregation’s desire to remain independent of any external influence.

Opera: Passion, power and politics

0

From the sublime to the frankly terrifying; from the exquisite displays of Baroque Handelian instruments to the gruesome and disturbing videos of a blood-covered Salome cradling the head of Jochanan, the exhibition in the Sainsbury Gallery could be perceived as the thrilling melting pot of truly holistic art form.

Following seven different European regions, the audience is able to experience the role of opera in national identity, class and rebellion.  The sound system perfectly facilitated the decision to make the music itself the focal point of the exhibition. The headphones provided selected tracks of operatic works by acclaimed performers, as well as commentaries creating an immersive atmosphere in an already visual stimulating moment. To be particularly lauded is the Leningrad section. Shostakovich’s Lady Macbeth of the Mtsensk District is the focal opera, featuring harrowing visual displays of the darkly themed opera alongside a rarely seen score of Shostakovich’s.

However I am left unsure who this exhibit is aimed at. Whilst the artefacts and design are striking, they only scratch the surface of operatic context. The exploration of the musical content seems superficial, and in some displays only really discussed by showing a few period instruments. Equally, whilst the drama of opera is evident, the accessibility to a modern day audience isn’t convincing. It is hard to fault the all-encompassing aesthetic, epitomising opera as an art that contains not just music, but also of costume, and the power of movement. This is an aspect which Kate Bailey, the curator, explained was the reason it was chosen as an ideal topic for the V&A. However, its polarisation of geography fell short in the omission of certain key operatic cultures.

It seems a shame to only explore Paris through Wagner, forgetting French opera, Britten’s English operatic protagonists, or even America’s multicontinental influences and creation of operetta. In representing a holistic art form it is easy to make a superficial sweep of individual elements, rather than digging deep into the cohesive whole, which is something that the V&A may have fall victim to.

Oxford graduates establish black alumni network

0

A group of black Oxford graduates have set up a network to encourage more black teenagers to apply to Oxford.

The Oxford Black Alumni Network, which has over 200 members, also aims to alleviate the lack of black people in high-profile jobs.The network states that it is aware that “many negative perceptions persist about accessing and studying at the University of Oxford and other elite higher education institutions… [and] are determined to work against the disadvantages that hold many back.”

Naomi Kellman, the network’s co-chair, who graduated with a PPE degree in 2011, said: “There is still a concern among black students that if they apply they might be the only one — they might think Oxford is not for ‘people like me’.

“But we want to show that’s not true. There is a long history of black students at Oxford doing well and being happy.”

Samuel Gebreselassie, another PPE graduate said: “By increasing the visibility of role models for younger people, we hope this campaign will demonstrate that Oxford is a place where people from diverse backgrounds can belong and thrive.”

In 2016 only 45 offers were made to black students out of around 3,200 undergraduate places – a proportion of 1.4%.

Don’t just break the fourth wall, go and watch a film outside

0

This August, I wearily left my workplace, and jumped on an hour long train into central London. Two hours, one heavily delayed train journey, and about ten tubes stops later I arrived in Peckham, already £12.90 worse-off and in unfamiliar territory.

I stepped out from the underground station and after a few minutes’ walk I found myself ascending seven flights of stairs to the top of an abandoned warehouse. The termination of my wanderings: the rooftop of the Bussey Building, where an incredible panorama of the capital city greeted me. To my left was a 15-foot high screen, where Trainspotting (the original) would be screened in about an hour.

Watching a film outdoors is a surreal, magical and utterly enchanting adventure. Across the UK, more and more pop-up companies are making a tidy profit flogging film viewings in beautiful locations. It works. Although the technical expert at the Rooftop Film Club in Peckham was having a few problems in getting the headphones to actually emit any sound, and then inexplicably started the film from about 30 minutes in, the overall experience was wonderful. There is something quite extraordinary about watching a cult-classic as the sun sets, with an entire city serving as the backdrop behind the film itself.

In previous years, I’ve watched The Silence of the Lambs, and The Shining at Somerset House, which is more conveniently situated slap-bang in the heart of central London, a stone’s throw from Piccadilly Circus, Covent Garden and the South Bank. If you can catch a good film whilst the sun is setting, you are in for a treat. Unlike many other options, at Somerset House you are able to bring your own food in to eat whilst watching, and many take full advantage, with takeaway Pizza Express an especially excellent option. I would have made it a hat-trick of successive visits had the tickets for the best films not been all sold out two months in advance. It is rightly, and frustratingly, very popular.

So I gave Peckham a chance, and was not disappointed. Whilst Somerset House rightly remains the top choice with its gorgeous neoclassical architecture, and its bar and live DJ contributing to a great buzz prior to the film, alternatives in London (and indeed elsewhere across the country) do exist and have a distinct impromptu charm about them.

Not only did the Rooftop Cinema Club offer a fantastic array of street food, but also deckchairs and blankets, which made for rather more comfortable viewing than only having a picnic rug between yourself and the stone courtyard floor of Somerset House. Therefore, a tip: bring a cushion, no matter how awkward this may make you as a passenger on public transport.

Of course, there is the issue of price when it comes to outdoor cinema. Whereas a visit to your local big screen might set you back a mere £5-6 once the ever-handy student discount is applied, a trip to Somerset House or the Bussey Building is about three times as expensive, and this is of course not factoring in travel costs.

However, I could not recommend it enough as a once-in-a-while treat, an immersive, surreal experience which would make a fine addition to next summer’s bucket list.

 

Cable shouldn’t fool himself – he won’t make it to Number 10

0

Jeremy Corbyn and Vince Cable are undeniably getting on a bit. The former is now 68, while the latter, at the age of 74, is only five years off the average age at which a UK male dies. Not only are they old, however, they also do old things. Jeremy Corbyn’s love affair with his North London allotment is well documented, as is his passion for jam-making.

Meanwhile Vince indulges in ballroom dancing and his choices on Desert Island Discs ranged from old classics such as ‘Love Letters on the Sand’ to even older classics: Mozart, Bach, Handel and Beethoven. Some see this as a barrier to Cable’s success. He has had to deny that he’s long in the tooth for the job as leader, whilst Jo Swinson’s team commenting that the replacement of Farron must not result in a switch “from the Dad to the Grandad”.

Yet age has not prevented Corbyn’s success; his vote in the general election instead sat at 64 percent in the 18-29 category. This might give hope to Cable. It suggests old age is not a barrier for this demographic, provided there is an appealing policy platform and image alongside. But Vince shouldn’t get his hopes up as a far greater barrier stands in his way: that of experience in high office.

Unfamiliarity with the reins of power seems to be a blessing instead of a curse these days. The largest political names of the past year have come from unexpected areas: Corbyn is of course one example, with the other obvious candidates being Trump, who swept aside establishment Republicans and then the establishment Democrat and Bernie Sanders, who at the age of 76 still a front-runner for 2020.

Meanwhile the youth vote is still suspicious of Cable’s stint in the Tory-Lib Dem coalition, which featured the infamous backtrack on tuition fees and a sharp program of austerity.

It’s debatable to what extent these can be attributed to Cable and the Lib Dems, but what’s clear is that by straying too close to the political heart of Britain Cable has made himself damaged goods. He has been tried and tested, and is therefore of little interest, particularly to a youth vote more concerned with change than experience.

Cable will therefore need to present an image of dynamism and conviction if he wants to win a commanding vote, especially among the youth demographic. I suspect that even if he managed the unimpressive feat of being more interesting than Farron, he has already lingered too long for the tastes of many voters, both young and old.

They say that age is just a number, and for once it appears to be true. The problem is not Cable’s years, it’s his experience in Whitehall. In today’s politics, that experience won’t help him.

Life Divided: Cycling

For: Charlie Cheesman

Picture this. It’s 8:59am, you have a 9am tutorial and, as you lie tucked up in your thermal pyjamas, you’re quite clearly late. There are many reasons why you might have ended up in this mess: an extra hour in Bridge chasing that special someone, a case of the infamous freshers’ flu forcing you to have an extra ten minutes in bed, or an alarm which you ‘forgot’ to set (we’ve all been there, pal).

Such inevitable moments are why you come to love the revolutionary invention that is the bicycle. Yes, you might arrive with a slight sheen on your forehead and yes, you might look a bit silly when you eventually join the cycling club and start wearing lycra on a daily basis. But as you storm through the crowds of tourists like a hero from Greek mythology, greater than Hercules, Artemis and Zeus combined, with the wind in your face and your heart pumping away all remnants of last night’s Jäger, these are worries soon forgotten – mostly because you’ve just seen your tutorial partner still a ten-minute walk away, and that means you can choose to talk about the only article on the reading list you actually read.

Cycling has its flaws, yet it is one of life’s simplest pleasures. Oxford’s traffic can be intimidating at rst, but cycling is one of the city’s defining features and, most importantly for students, it’s fantastically cheap. It’s easy when you first arrive at university not to exercise as you rush sporadically from soon-to-be- regretted nights out to whoops-I-forgot-that-was-today lectures, but the bicycle is there to help you through all of this.

Not only will it keep your cardiac muscle in some semblance of working order, and your hips from bursting your jeans, you can sleep soundly knowing that you’re doing something for the planet, that good ol’ Boris Johnson would probably love you, and that Oxford just wouldn’t be Oxford without its bicycles.

Against: Bessie Yuill

On our way back from a dinner out last term, my friends and I came across a quintessentially Oxford sight. An inebriated lad in black tie was weaving his way through Magdalen Street on a bike, with a girl, half-asleep, balanced side-saddle on the back wheel.

Seeing them roll down the street with such reckless abandon made me realise something: it’s the confidence of cyclists, not the bicycles themselves, which is the main scourge of Oxford’s streets.

I haven’t used a bike since the cycling proficiency test, so I’m far from an expert. But surely helmets are still a thing, right? We didn’t figure out sometime in the past decade that we never needed them, and people had looked like round-headed twats for no reason. Or do Oxford students just have more solid skulls? You’d think the Complete University Guide would factor that in, if so.

I haven’t asked any of these questions out loud, in case I’m shunned by the cycling elite who control this university and constantly talk about ‘locking up’ (elitist cycling slang?). It’s the same intimidating confidence behind this terminology that leads to wheeling about while wasted.

Basically, my number one complaint with cycling in Oxford is that seeing drunk people cycle makes me nervous. I have a delicate constitution and can only handle so much second-hand stress. So next time you ‘saddle up’ (elitist cycling slang again), please think of a passer-by’s blood pressure and walk the extra 20 minutes instead.

Ignore the naysayers, opera is for everyone

0

Opera is more affordable today than ever. The Royal Opera House, for example, is one of several venues to underline its commitment to the new generation of classical listeners. Signing up as a student costs you nothing, but gives you access to over 10,000 dedicated student tickets with prices ranging from £1 to £25. There is simply no truth to the idea opera is inaccessible. A cinema ticket, a football match, or even a haircut will set you back further than a trip to experience one of the world’s premier cultural centres.

Moreover, opera is as relevant today as it has ever been. With increasing political engagement amongst today’s youth, the ideological and philosophical questions posed by opera make it a fascinating response to its times, offering perspectives that make it pertinent as well as entertaining. For proof, look no further than John Adams’ exploration of power and politics in Nixon in China

Mark Anthony-Turnage’s examination of racism, unemployment and AIDS in Greek. The stereotype of sweeping staircases and glass chandeliers implies a world distant to the one we inhabit, but this is far from true. Opera is as engaging and engaged as ever. It is more youthful than you would expect too. The Royal Opera House’s Jette Parker Young Artists Programme provides paid work for fourteen talented young musicians. The Youth Opera Company also commissions and films its own operas, and has over fifty participants. Then there is the Young Creatives annual project, providing mentoring to six choreographers aged 16 to 25. Young people already make up a huge part of the House’s vibrant community.

Opera has too long been a victim of inverted snobbery. With engaging storylines, thrilling music and spectacular staging, the world of opera is a world for everyone.